請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90459
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾惠斌 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hui-Ping Tserng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳逸柏 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Po Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T16:10:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-10-03 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-24 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 范素玲 (2021) . IPD應用議題探討—以首次應用IPD 之業主為例,土木水利第四十八卷第一期,Vol. 48, No.1 February 2021。
[2] 行政院公共工程委員會,多元履約爭議處理介紹,2020年8月5日。https://ws.pcc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMjk3L3JlbGZpbGUvNzcyMi8zNzA3Lzc0NDZhNGZkLWI5ZGUtNDZiZS1iZWQ2LWY4ZmI4Y2RjYWQzNy5wZGY%3D&n=MTA5MDgwNeWkmuWFg%2BWxpee0hOeIreitsOiZleeQhuS7i%2Be0uS5wZGY%3D&icon=.pdf , 擷取於June 9 2023. [3] 王明德,「IPD的技術應用與管理」課程講義,2021. [4] Aapaoja, A., Herrala, M., Pekuri, A. and Haapasalo, H. (2013), "The characteristics of and cornerstones for creating integrated teams", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 695-713. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2012-0056 [5] Daniel W.M. Chan, Albert P.C. Chan, Patrick T.I. Lam, James M.W. Wong, (2011). An empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.002 [6] Haiyan Xie, Hua Liu, (2017). Studying Contract Provisions of Shared Responsibilities for IPD under National and International Standard Forms, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, Vol.9 Issue 4, April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000220 [7] Halttula, H., Aapaoja, A., & Haapasalo, H. (2015). The Contemporaneous use of Building Information Modeling and Relational Project Delivery Arrangements. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00209-9 [8] Lianying Zhang, Shanshan Huang, Chenhan Tian, Haiyan Guo, (2020). How Do Relational Contracting Norms Affect IPD Teamwork Effectiveness? A Social Capital Perspective. Project Management Journal, Vol.51(5), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820911241 [9] Lim Shin Yee, Chai Chang Saar, Aminah Md Yusof, Loo Siaw Chuing, and Heap-Yih Chong, (2017). An Empirical Review of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) System, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, February 2017. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.1.693 [10] Michael W. Ibrahim, A.M.; Awad Hanna, F.; and Dave Kievet, (2019). Quantitative Comparison of Project Performance between Project Delivery Systems. Journal of Management in Engineering Volume 37, Issue 3, April 2019, 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.012 [11] Muaz O. Ahmed, Mohamad Abdul Nabi, Islam H. El-adaway, Dustin Caranci, Jackson Eberle, Zachary Hawkins, Ross Sparrow, (2021). Contractual Guidelines for Promoting IPD, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.147 Issue 11, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002173 [12] Pertti Lahdenperä (2012), Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery, Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 30:1, 57-79, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947 [13] Peter Galvin a ,Stephane Tywoniak, Janet Sutherland, (2021). Collaboration and opportunism in megaproject alliance contracts: The interplay between governance, trust and culture, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.39, 394-405, April 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.007 [14] Rayan Assaad, Islam H. El-adaway, Ayman H. El Hakea, Matthew J. Parker, Tyler I. Henderson, Christopher R. Salvo, Muaz O. Ahmed, (2020). Contractual Perspective for BIM Utilization in US Construction Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.146, Issue 12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001927 [15] Viana, M. L., Hadikusumo, B. H. W., Mohammad, M. Z., and Kahvandi, Z.,Integrated, (2020). Project Delivery (IPD)-An Updated Review and Analysis Case Study, Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management, 10(2), 147-161, March 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeppm-2020-0017 [16] Zahra Kahvandi, Ehsan Saghatforoush, Mahdi Alinezhad, and Farimah Noghli, (2017). Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Research Trends, Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 7(2), 99-114. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/62e5/ef05663ac7220845e58eb624a1f3d3882512.pdf [17] Zahra Kahvandi, Ehsan Saghatforoush, Ahad ZareRavasan, Marina Lapa Viana, (2020). A Review and Classification of Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Enablers, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 25(2), December 2020. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2020.25.2.9 [18] Jung, W., Ballard, G., Kim, Y.-W., & Han, S. H. (2012). Understanding of Target Value Design for Integrated Project Delivery with the Context of Game Theory, Construction Research Congress 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.056 [19] Liu, M., & Griffis, F. H. B., & Bates, A. J. (2013), Compensation Structure and Contingency Allocation in Integrated Project Delivery, Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--19326 [20] Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi, Ehsan Hamzanlui Moghaddam, Yilmaz Karasulu (2013), Advancing Target Price and Target Value Design Process in IPD Using BIM and Risk-Sharing Approaches, 49th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2013/paper/CPRT115002013.pdf [21] Willis, D. and Alves, T.C.L.. (2019). Contracting for Collaboration in Construction. In: Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Pasquire C. and Hamzeh F.R. (ed.), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 809-818. https://doi.org/10.24928/2019/0222. [22] AIA. (2007). Integrated Project Delivery : A Guide. AIA, 1-57. https://zdassets.aiacontracts.org/ctrzdweb02/zdpdfs/ipd_guide.pdf [23] Allison, Markku; Ashcraft, Howard; Cheng, Renee; Klawens, Sue; Pease, James, Integrated Project Delivery: An Action Guide for Leaders, Integrated Project Delivery Alliance (IPDA), Center for Innovation in the Design and Construction Industry (CIDCI), Charles Pankow Foundation, (2018). https://leanipd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IPD-An-Action-Guide-for-Leaders.pdf [24] A Joint Effort of the National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA); Construction Owners Association of America (COAA); APPA: The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers; Associated General Contractors of America (AGC); and American Institute of Architects (AIA), Integrated Project Delivery For Public and Private Owners, 2010. https://www.agc.org/sites/default/files/Files/Programs%20%26%20Industry%20Relations/IPD%20for%20Public%20and%20Private%20Owners_1.pdf [25] AIA, AIA Minnesota, School of Architecture University of Minnesota, 2012, IPD Case Studies. https://leanipd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/aiab093703-IPD-Case-Studies-2012.pdf, retrieved June 11 2023. [26] AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2008). “General conditions of the contract for integrated project delivery.” AIA A295. https://acdoperations.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500010393641-Summary-A295-2008-General-Conditions-of-the-Contract-for-Integrated-Project-Delivery#summary-a295-2008-general-conditions-of-the-contract-for-integrated-project-delivery-0, retrieved June 11 2023. [27] AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2008). “Standard form of agreement between owner and contractor for integrated project delivery.” AIA A195. https://acdoperations.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500010355002-Instructions-A195-2008-Standard-Form-of-Agreement-Between-Owner-and-Contractor-for-Integrated-Project-Delivery, retrieved June 11 2023. [28] AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2022)“BIM Exhibit for Sharing Models with Project Participants, Where Model Versions May be Enumerated as a Contract Document.”AIA E201. https://acdoperations.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/7353602075283-Summary-E201-2022-BIM-Exhibit-for-Sharing-Models-with-Project-Participants-Where-Model-Versions-May-be-Enumerated-as-a-Contract-Document, retrieved June 11 2023. [29] AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2013) “Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit”AIA E203. https://acdoperations.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500010381521-Summary-E203-2013-Building-Information-Modeling-and-Digital-Data-Exhibit, retrieved June 11 2023. [30] Dawn Killough, Last Updated Apr 27, 2023, 6 Construction Project Delivery Methods Compared. https://www.procore.com/library/construction-project-delivery-methods, retrieved June 11 2023. [31] LCI, 6 Principles of Lean, https://leanconstruction.org/about/lean-tenets/ , retrieved June 11 2023. [32] LCI, A3 Thinking, https://leanconstruction.org/lean-topics/a3/, retrieved June 11 2023. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90459 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 整合專案交付 (Integrated Project Delivery, IPD) 之採購模式,美國建築師學會 (American Institute of Architects, AIA) 定義為一種專案交付方法,它將人員、系統、業務結構和實務整合到一個過程中,協同利用所有參與者的才能和見解來優化專案結果、增加業主的價值、減少浪費並通過設計、製造和施工所有階段的最大化提高效率。業主將開發需求提供給專業設計人員,進行概念設計。設計完成後,即進行施工廠商發包作業,讓施工團隊提早進入參與細部設計,將原本施工階段才會發現的問題,提早於設計階段發現並討論,如此既可達到設計與施工界面的整合、先設計邊施工以縮短工期等優勢,同時業主仍保有對工程的主控權力,設計專業人員負責設計與工程品質的把關,施工廠商提早進入專案,提供施工意見,而使設計方案與實際施工貼合,減少重複工作。
國外研究顯示,IPD之採購模式,對於專案成本、品質、進度、安全、溝通與變更管理之績效,優於傳統交付模式設計-投標-施工 (DBB)、統包 (DB) 及施工管理 (CM),因此國外許多大型且複雜的專案,開始採用 IPD 交付模式。隨著案例增加的情形下,相關的研究也相應地增加,近來研究趨勢顯示,IPD 合約類別顯示出強勁的趨勢,其研究重點是協作和架構,以提高施工效率。 國內營建專案執行成本超支、進度逾期及變更頻繁已成常態,業界為解決問題,已朝發包模式的改良著手,建築業逐漸引進廠商早期參與 (ECI) 概念,近年開始有專案採用 IPD模式。IPD 之應用在國內尚屬萌芽階段,相關研究參考文獻數量有限,為使 IPD 之採購模式能讓國內業界了解其優勢及本質,順應國外研究趨勢,本研究主要就整合專案交付之合約架構,以國內某建築案為例,以專家訪談與問卷調查的研究方法,探討國內應用 IPD 之情形與對合約管理的看法,參考國外 IPD 合約範本及 IPD 合約管理相關研究,研討適用國內 之 IPD 合約架構,並就 IPD 原則在國內之應用及推廣提出建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), which is defined by AIA (American Institute of Architects) is a project delivery approach that integrates people, systems, business structures and practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner, reduce waste, and maximize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication, and construction. The owner provides the development requirements to the design professionals for Conceptual Design. After the Design is completed, the contracting work of the General Contractor will be carried out immediately so that the construction team can enter and participate in the detailed design early. The problems discovered in the initial construction stage can be found and discussed earlier in the design stage to achieve the integration of the design and construction interface, advance Design and construction to shorten the construction period, and other advantages. At the same time, the owner still retains the main control over the project; design professionals are responsible for the quality control of design and engineering; contractors and manufacturers enter the project early and provide construction opinions so that the design plan fits the actual construction, reducing duplication of work.
Foreign studies have shown that the IPD procurement model is superior to the traditional delivery approach design-bid-build (DBB), design-build (DB), and construction management (CM), so many large and complex projects abroad have begun to adopt the IPD delivery mode. As the number of cases increases, the related research also increases accordingly. Recent research trends show that the IPD contract category shows a strong trend, and its research focuses on collaboration and structure to improve construction efficiency. Cost overruns, schedule overdue and frequent changes have become the norm in domestic construction projects. To solve the problems, the industry has started to improve the contracting model. The construction industry has gradually introduced the concept of early contractor involvement (ECI). In recent years, some projects have begun to adopt the IPD approach. The application of IPD is still in its infancy in Taiwan, and the number of relevant research references is limited. To enable the domestic industry to understand the advantages and essence of the IPD contracting model and to follow the trend of foreign research, this research mainly focuses on the contract structure of integrated project delivery. Studying a construction case in Taiwan as an example, using expert interviews and questionnaires to discuss the application of IPD in Taiwan and the views on contract management, referring to foreign IPD contract samples and related research on IPD contract management, discussing the application of domestic IPD contracts framework, and make suggestions on the application and promotion of IPD principles in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-10-03T16:10:27Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-10-03T16:10:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 ix 附錄 xi 第一章 導論 1 1-1 研究背景 1 1-2 研究動機 1 1-3 研究範圍 1 1-4 研究方法 2 1-5 研究流程 2 1-6 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2-1 總覽式文獻回顧 4 2-1-1 IPD 交付模式 4 2-1-2 IPD 概念框架 6 2-1-3 IPD 研究趨勢 8 2-1-4 IPD 實施促成因素 9 2-2 IPD 合約相關文獻回顧 11 2-2-1 IPD 合約關注議題 11 2-2-2 IPD 合約協議類型 18 2-2-3 IPD 合約 BIM 的使用 20 2-2-4 IPD 合約之財務激勵 23 2-3 小結 26 第三章 IPD 背景知識彙整 27 3-1 IPD 的概念與原則 27 3-1-1 IPD 的發展歷程 27 3-1-2 IPD 指南 (2007) 之9項原則 27 3-1-3 選擇 IPD 的可能動機 28 3-2 IPD合約範本簡介 29 3-2-1 美國常用的 IPD 合約系統 29 3-2-2 AIA IPD 合約系統簡介 30 3-2-3 AIA A-295 合約範本 31 3-2-4 AIA A-195合約範本 35 3-2-5 AIA E201合約範本 36 3-2-6 AIA E203合約範本 38 3-2-7 ConsensusDocs® IPD 合約系統簡介 39 3-2-8 ConsensusDocs 300合約範本內容簡介 40 3-3 IPD 應用技術簡介 42 3-3-1 精實營建 (Lean Construction) 42 3-3-2 目標價值設計 (Target Value Design, TVD) 45 3-3-3 保證最高價格 (GMP) 與預估最高價格 (EMP) 48 3-3-4 建築資訊建模 (Building Information Modeling, BIM) 51 3-4 小結 54 第四章 案例研討 55 4-1 工程概要 55 4-2 主要參與者及組織架構 55 4-2-1 專案團隊主要參與者 55 4-2-2 專案組織架構(施工前期階段) 55 4-2-3 實施 IPD 工程階段管理架構 56 4-3 管理分工及權責劃分 56 4-3-1 設計管理分工 56 4-3-2 權責劃分 58 4-4 合約文件架構 62 4-4-1 合約文件組成 62 4-4-2 合約主條文 63 4-4-3 總承包商工程補充說明 64 4-4-4 BIM資訊模型補充說明 65 4-4-5 工程一般條款 67 4-4-6 服務建議書 68 4-5 合約架構檢討 69 4-5-1 合約主架構 69 4-5-2 合約主條文內容檢討 70 4-5-3 補充條款檢討 73 4-6 小結 75 第五章 合約架構研討 77 5-1 專家訪談 77 5-1-1 訪談計畫 77 5-1-2 訪談內容 77 5-1-3 訪談結果 79 5-2 問卷調查 83 5-2-1 問卷調查計劃 83 5-2-2 問卷調查內容 83 5-2-3 問卷調查結果 84 5-3 國內執行 IPD 之合約管理面向統整 91 5-3-1 由案例研討 IPD 合約管理面向 92 5-3-2 由專家訪談研討 IPD 合約管理面向 92 5-3-3 由問卷調查研討 IPD 合約管理面向 92 5-4 組織與協作 93 5-4-1 國外相關條款 93 5-4-2 國內現況及差異之調整 94 5-4-3 合約架構的調整與建議 95 5-5 報酬、風險分擔與利潤分享 97 5-5-1 國外相關條款 97 5-5-2 國內現況及差異之調整 99 5-5-3 合約架構的調整與建議 100 5-6 爭議處理 104 5-6-1 國外相關條款 104 5-6-2 國內現況及差異之調整 105 5-6-3 合約架構的調整與建議 106 5-7 資訊共享 106 5-7-1 國外相關條款 106 5-7-2 國內現況及差異之調整 107 5-7-3 合約架構的調整與建議 108 5-8 小結 109 5-8-1 專家訪談 109 5-8-2 問卷調查 109 5-8-3 國內 IPD 合約管理 110 第六章 結論 111 6-1 研究結果與建議 111 6-1-1 IPD 基礎研究結果 111 6-1-2 國內應用 IPD 研究結果 111 6-1-3 適用國內 IPD 合約架構研究結果 112 6-1-4 國內應用 IPD 之建議 112 6-2 本研究之限制與可改善處 114 6-2-1 研究限制 114 6-2-2 研究可改善處 114 6-3 本研究可能之後續研究主題 114 參考文獻: 115 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 整合專案交付(IPD)之合約架構研究-以台灣某建築案為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on Contract Structure of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) - Case Study of a Construction Project in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王明德 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Ming-Teh Wang | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林偲妘;顏玉明 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Szu-Yun Lin;Yu-Ming Yan | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 整合專案交付,交付模式,合約架構,合約框架,合約模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | integrated project delivery,IPD,delivery method,contract structure,contract framework,contracting, | en |
dc.relation.page | 155 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301857 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-25 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-07-20 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2028-07-20 | 5.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。