請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90322
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳羿貞 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yi-Jane Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡政彥 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yen Tsai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-26T16:15:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-26 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-13 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Baek, C., Paeng, J. Y., Lee, J. S., & Hong, J. (2012). Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70(5), 1161-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135
Baek, S. H., Cho, I. S., Chang, Y. I., & Kim, M. J. (2007). Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104(5), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.002 Baek, S. H., Kim, T. K., & Kim, M. J. (2006). Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 101(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.007 Chen, Y. J., Yao, C. C., Chang, Z. C., Lai, H. H., Lu, S. C., & Kok, S. H. (2016). A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 44(6), 676-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.011 Chen, Y. J., Yao, C. C., Chang, Z. C., Lai, H. H., Yeh, K. J., & Kok, S. H. (2019). Characterization of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III malocclusion and its implications for treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48(12), 1533-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.014 Chen, Z., Mo, S., Fan, X., You, Y., Ye, G., & Zhou, N. (2021). A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Based on Randomized Clinical Trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 79(2), 471 e471-471 e419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.005 Chew, M. T. (2006). Spectrum and management of dentofacial deformities in a multiethnic Asian population. Angle Orthod, 76(5), 806-809. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0806:SAMODD]2.0.CO;2 Choi, J. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2021). Current concept of the surgery-first orthognathic approach. Arch Plast Surg, 48(2), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01305 Christie, K. F., Boucher, N., & Chung, C. H. (2010). Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137(4 Suppl), S79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.024 De Riu, G., Meloni, S. M., Baj, A., Corda, A., Soma, D., & Tullio, A. (2014). Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52(3), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.010 Guo, J., Wang, T., Han, J. J., Jung, S., Kook, M. S., Park, H. J., & Oh, H. K. (2018). Corrective outcome and transverse stability after orthognathic surgery using a surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with and without facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.01.017 Ha, S. W., Kim, S. J., Choi, J. Y., & Baek, S. H. (2022). Characterization of facial asymmetry phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using three-dimensional computed tomography and cluster analysis. Korean J Orthod, 52(2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.85 Han, J. J., Yang, H. J., Lee, S. J., & Hwang, S. J. (2014). Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42(6), 811-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.018 Haraguchi, S., Takada, K., & Yasuda, Y. (2002). Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthod, 72(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0028:FAISWS>2.0.CO;2 Hsu, L. F., Liu, Y. J., Kok, S. H., Chen, Y. J., Chen, Y. J., Chen, M. H., & Jane Yao, C. C. (2021). Differences of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery among Class II and Class III patients. J Formos Med Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.01.018 Hsu, S. S., Gateno, J., Bell, R. B., Hirsch, D. L., Markiewicz, M. R., Teichgraeber, J. F., Zhou, X., & Xia, J. J. (2013). Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71(1), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027 Jeon, H. J., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. W., Yang, J. D., Chung, H. Y., Cho, B. C., & Choi, K. Y. (2020). Stability of lingual plate osteotomy in orthognathic surgery for patients with severe facial asymmetry: A retrospective analysis with 1-year follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 48(2), 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.12.014 Katsumata, A., Fujishita, M., Maeda, M., Ariji, Y., Ariji, E., & Langlais, R. P. (2005). 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99(2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072 Kim, H. J., Noh, H. K., & Park, H. S. (2023). Use of a novel body mandibular plane (mental foramen-protuberance menti) in analyzing mandibular asymmetry compared with conventional border mandibular plane. Angle Orthod, 93(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.2319/072522-513.1 Kim, J. W., Son, W. S., Kim, S. S., & Kim, Y. I. (2015). Proximal Segment Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Facial Asymmetry Patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 73(8), 1592-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.021 Kim, K. A., Lee, J. W., Park, J. H., Kim, B. H., Ahn, H. W., & Kim, S. J. (2017). Targeted presurgical decompensation in patients with yaw-dependent facial asymmetry. Korean J Orthod, 47(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.195 Koerich, L., Burns, D., Weissheimer, A., & Claus, J. D. (2016). Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45(5), 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.12.006 Kwon, S. M., Baik, H. S., Jung, H. D., Jang, W., & Choi, Y. J. (2019). Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77(6), 1261-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.028 Lee, G. H., Cho, H. K., Hwang, H. S., & Kim, J. C. (1998). Studies of relationship between PA cephalometric measurements and vidual facial asymmetry. Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology, 11(1), 41-48. Lee, Y., Chun, Y.-S., Kang, N., & Kim, M. (2012). Volumetric changes in the upper airway after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions: a case series study using 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 70(12), 2867-2875. Li, J., Ryu, S. Y., Park, H. J., Kook, M. S., Jung, S., Han, J. J., & Oh, H. K. (2017). Changes in condylar position after BSSRO with and without Le Fort I osteotomy via surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 123(6), 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.01.009 Maeda, M., Katsumata, A., Ariji, Y., Muramatsu, A., Yoshida, K., Goto, S., Kurita, K., & Ariji, E. (2006). 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102(3), 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.057 Masuoka, N., Muramatsu, A., Ariji, Y., Nawa, H., Goto, S., & Ariji, E. (2007). Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 131(5), 609-613. Oh, M. H., Hwang, H. S., Lee, K. M., & Cho, J. H. (2017). Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach. Angle Orthod, 87(5), 733-738. https://doi.org/10.2319/122316-925.1 Pirttiniemi, P. M. (1994). Associations of mandibular and facial asymmetries--a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70038-9 Proffit, W. R., Turvey, T. A., & Phillips, C. (2007). The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension. Head Face Med, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-3-21 Rodrigues, O. (1840). Des lois géométriques qui régissent les déplacements d'un système solide dans l'espace, et de la variation des coordonnées provenant de ces déplacements considérés indépendamment des causes qui peuvent les produire. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées, 5, 380-440. Romero Rodríguez, R., & González, M. (1996). Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 81(1), 31-33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80143-0 Ryu, H.-S., An, K.-Y., & Kang, K.-H. (2015). Cone-beam computed tomography based evaluation of rotational patterns of dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III deformity with mandibular asymmetry. Korean journal of orthodontics, 45(4), 153. Scarfe, W. C., & Farman, A. G. (2008). What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America, 52(4), 707-730. Scarfe, W. C., Farman, A. G., & Sukovic, P. (2006). Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc, 72(1), 75-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16480609 Silva, M. A., Wolf, U., Heinicke, F., Bumann, A., Visser, H., & Hirsch, E. (2008). Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133(5), 640 e641-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019 Slabaugh, G. G. (1999). Computing Euler angles from a rotation matrix. Retrieved on August, 6(2000), 39-63. Sohmura, T., Hojo, H., Nakajima, M., Wakabayashi, K., Nagao, M., Iida, S., Kitagawa, T., Kogo, M., Kojima, T., & Matsumura, K. (2004). Prototype of simulation of orthognathic surgery using a virtual reality haptic device. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 33(8), 740-750. Takahara, N., Kimura, A., Tomomatsu, N., Nakakuki, K., & Yoda, T. (2020). Does the amount of mandibular setback during bimaxillary surgery correlate with the degree of surgical relapse? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 129(5), 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.014 Titiroongruang, W., Liao, Y. F., Chen, Y. A., Yao, C. F., & Chen, Y. R. (2020). A new 3D analysis on displacement of proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for class III asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig, 24(10), 3641-3651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03242-3 Tyan, S., Kim, H. H., Park, K. H., Kim, S. J., Kim, K. A., & Ahn, H. W. (2017). Sequential changes of postoperative condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry. Angle Orthod, 87(2), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.2319/030916-203.1 Tyan, S., Park, H. S., Janchivdorj, M., Han, S. H., Kim, S. J., & Ahn, H. W. (2016). Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod, 86(3), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.2319/030915-142.1 Udomlarptham, N., Lin, C. H., Wang, Y. C., & Ko, E. W. (2018). Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47(8), 1022-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.02.014 Ueki, K., Degerliyurt, K., Hashiba, Y., Marukawa, K., Nakagawa, K., & Yamamoto, E. (2008). Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106(5), 656-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.016 van Vlijmen, O. J., Bergé, S. J., Swennen, G. R., Bronkhorst, E. M., Katsaros, C., & Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. (2009). Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 67(1), 92-97. Yang, H. J., & Hwang, S. J. (2014). Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42(4), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.021 Yang, H. J., Lee, W. J., Yi, W. J., & Hwang, S. J. (2010). Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 110(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.049 You, K. H., Lee, K. J., Lee, S. H., & Baik, H. S. (2010). Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138(5), 540 e541-548; discussion 540-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.025 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90322 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
探討骨性三級異常咬合患者在接受正顎手術合併矯正治療後,顏面軟硬組織不對稱性的改善情形,以及下顎骨遠心骨塊移動對於近心骨塊移動的影響及其相關性。 材料與方法: 本回溯性研究包括30位完成勒弗氏一型手術與下顎矢狀分裂骨切開術合併矯正治療的骨性三級異常咬合患者 (男性:13位,女性:17位,平均年齡:22.43 ± 4.71歲) ,其正顎手術規劃皆藉助數位手術模擬完成設計。研究方法: 將治療前後的全頭顱錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描 (cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT)影像,匯入Amira® 3D Pro Amira進行三維影像重組及資料分析,利用Voxel-based Registration將之手術前及整體治療完成後的CBCT影像疊合,利用虛擬三角形來代表不同骨塊,以分析各骨塊在治療前後的位置變化,包括在X, Y, Z軸向的平移量以及Pitch, Roll, Yaw旋轉角度,並依本院正顎手術及矯正研究團隊過去所提出的顏面不對稱分類架構進行探討。分類架構定義如下:Group 1為下頷點歪斜與下頷枝較寬側同方向且大於下頷枝寬度差異;Group 2為下頷點歪斜與下頷枝較寬側同方向且小於下頷枝寬度差異;Group 3為下頷點歪斜與下頷枝較寬側方向相反。 結果與結論: 本研究的測量值具有高度的觀察者內信度,所有測量項目的組內相關係數皆在0.9以上。三個組別的下頷點偏斜治療後皆有顯著改善;下顎枝寬度的對稱性在Group 1以及 Group 2中也有顯著改善,而在Group 3中並沒有更加惡化。 骨塊的移動分析顯示,Group 1上顎呈現Non-deviated side roll upward及咬合平面偏斜的改善;Group 2 下顎遠心骨塊移動與Group 1相似,多以往非偏斜側、往後、往上移動為主;Group 3 下顎遠心骨塊有明顯Yaw rotation及Deviated side roll upward,偏斜側近心骨塊有較多的Pitch upward 以及較少的Roll inward,非偏斜側近心骨塊有較多Yaw inward,上述變化有助於維持術後下顎枝寬度的對稱性。 至於相關性分析的結果顯示Group 1與Group 2 的下顎骨遠心骨塊平移與下頷點偏斜及下頷枝對稱性的改善有關。Group 3的下顎骨遠心骨塊Yaw 旋轉及Deviated-side roll upward 皆與非偏斜側近心骨塊未更向外側Roll outward存在顯著相關性。 總結而言,骨性三級異常咬合患者的正顎手術及矯正治療可根據顏面不對稱特徵適當給予相對應的數位手術模擬規劃以達成良好的治療成果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose:
The study aimed to investigate the improvement of soft and hard tissue facial asymmetry in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion after surgical-orthodontic treatment, as well as the impact of the translation and rotation of the mandibular distal segment on the movement of the proximal segment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of orthodontic treatment combined with double-jaw surgery aid by digital surgical simulation in 30 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion (13 males, 17 females; mean age: 22.43 ± 4.71 years). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before surgery and after orthodontic treatment, then the scans were superimposed using voxel-based registration and analyzed with Amira® 3D Pro Amira software. A total of 4 virtual triangles were used to represent the bone segments of LeFort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Afterwards, the positional change of the virtual triangles were analyzed to assess the movement of jaw bones, including translation in the x, y, and z axes, as well as pitch, roll, and yaw rotations. Movement of the bone segments were further delineated for the different pattern of facial asymmetry based on our classification system described previously. Patients in Group 1 and 2 showed menton and ramus deviation to the same side. Group 1 patients exhibited a larger shift of the menton but smaller ramus deviation. For the group 2 patients, gonion asymmetry is more evident than menton deviation. As for the group 3 patients, the direction of menton deviation is opposite to the prominent gonial region. Results: All intraclass correlation coefficients of the measured values were above 0.9, indicating a high level of intra-observer reliability. After treatment, a notable improvement was observed in chin deviation in all three groups. Moreover, Group 1 and Group 2 showed a significant correction in the asymmetry of mandibular ramus width, whereas Group 3 did not experience any further deterioration. In Group 1, the maxilla segment presented a roll upward at non-deviated side, contributing to the correction of canted occlusal plane. In Group 2, the movement of the mandibular distal segment was similar to that in Group 1, resulting in a position change toward the non-deviated side, posterior and upward translation. In Group 3, the mandibular distal segment exhibited a significant yaw rotation and upward roll on the deviated side, while the proximal segment at the deviated side showed more pitch upward and less inward roll. The proximal segment at the non-deviated side showed more inward yaw rotation. These changes might contribute to the correction of asymmetry in mandibular ramus width. The results of the correlation analysis showed that the mandibular distal segment translation in Group 1 and Group 2 improved the menton deviation and also enhanced the symmetry of the mandibular ramus width. In Group 3, both the yaw rotation and deviated side upward roll of the distal segment have a significant correlation with a less roll outward of the non-deviated side. Conclusions: In this study, all the Class III subjects diagnosed as skeletal Class III, who were divided into three groups based on their facial features and given corresponding digital surgical planning for jaw movement, could improve their facial asymmetry after orthodontic and orthognathic treatment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-26T16:15:44Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-26T16:15:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES x Chapter 1 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 骨性三級異常咬合與顏面不對稱 1 1.3 顏面不對稱的分析及分類 2 1.4 錐狀射束電腦斷層掃描 (cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT) 3 1.5 數位手術模擬 5 1.6 近心骨塊在下顎骨矢狀劈開術 Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) 的移動變化 6 Chapter 2 研究目的 8 2.1 目標 8 2.2 虛無假說 8 Chapter 3 研究材料與方法 9 3.1 研究對象及數位手術模擬原則 9 3.2 錐狀射束斷層掃描資料 9 3.3 三維影像定位 10 3.4 顏面不對稱的分類 10 3.5 三維影像之測量 11 3.5.1 顏面部軟硬組織不對稱性之量測 11 3.5.2 下顎骨近遠心骨塊及上顎骨塊移動之量測 11 3.6 統計分析 12 Chapter 4 結果 14 4.1 信賴度與常態分佈檢定 14 4.2 術前顏面不對稱分析 14 4.2.1 患者治療前特徵 14 4.2.2 Group 1 14 4.2.3 Group 2 15 4.2.4 Group 3 15 4.3 手術矯正後顏面不對稱改善情形 16 4.3.1 Group 1 16 4.3.2 Group 2 16 4.3.3 Group 3 17 4.4 術後骨塊移動的方向及測量值 18 4.4.1 Group 1 18 4.4.2 Group 2 18 4.4.3 Group 3 19 4.5 各骨塊移動的方向與測量值在三組之間的差異 20 4.5.1 遠心骨塊移動在三組之間的差異 20 4.5.2 偏斜側近心骨塊移動在三組之間的差異 20 4.5.3 非偏斜側近心骨塊移動在三組之間的差異 20 4.5.4 上顎骨塊移動在三組之間的差異 21 4.6 BSSO近遠心骨塊移動之相關性分析 21 4.6.1 Group 1&2 21 4.6.2 Group 3 21 4.6.3 MdF橫向移動與下頷枝寬度變化的相關性 22 Chapter 5 討論 23 5.1 顏面不對稱分類 23 5.2 術前顏面不對稱程度及分析 23 5.2.1 Group 1 23 5.2.2 Group 2 24 5.2.3 Group 3 24 5.3 骨塊移動與顏面不對稱改善分析 25 5.3.1 Group 1 25 5.3.2 Group 2 26 5.3.3 Group 3 27 5.4 BSSO近遠心骨塊移動之相關性分析 28 5.4.1 Group 1&2 28 5.4.2 Group 3 29 5.4.3 MdF橫向移動與下頷枝寬度變化的相關性 29 5.5 對於臨床治療可能的指引 30 5.5.1 Group 1 30 5.5.2 Group 2 30 5.5.3 Group 3 31 5.6 本研究的限制 31 Chapter 6 結論 34 Chapter 7 未來展望 35 REFERENCE 36 FIGURES 41 TABLES 53 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 骨性三級異常咬合之顏面不對稱手術矯正治療結果分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Surgical-orthodontic Treatment Outcome of Facial Asymmetry in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳政憲;郭生興 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Cheng-Hsien Wu;Sang-Heng Kok | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 顏面不對稱,骨性三級異常咬合,正顎手術,下顎矢狀分裂骨切開術,數位手術模擬, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Class III malocclusion,Facial asymmetry,Orthognathic surgery,Proximal segment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300689 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-06-13 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 19.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。