Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89910
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳淑鈴zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShu-Ling Wuen
dc.contributor.author王姿螢zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorZih-Ying Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T16:38:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-07-24-
dc.identifier.citationAcemoglu, Carvalho, Ozdaglar, & Tahbaz-Salehi. (2012). The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 80(5), 1977-2016.
Acemoglu, Ozdaglar, & Tahbaz-Salehi. (2010). Cascades in Networks and Aggregate Volatility. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Addoum, Ng, & Ortiz-Bobea. (2020). Temperature Shocks and Establishment Sales. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1331-1366.
Aggarwal, & Samwick. (1999a). Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1999-2043.
Aggarwal, & Samwick. (1999b). The Other Side of the Trade-off: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 107(1), 65-105.
Alley. (1984). The Palmer Drought Severity Index: Limitations and Assumptions. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 23(7), 1100-1109.
Baker, Jensen, & Murphy. (1988). Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 593-616.
Banker, Lee, & Potter. (1996). A Field Study of the Impact of a Performance-Based Incentive Plan. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(2), 195-226.
Bansal, Kiku, & Ochoa. (2016). Price of Long-Run Temperature Shifts in Capital Markets. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bansal, & Ochoa. (2011). Temperature, Aggregate Risk, and Expected Returns. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barrot, & Sauvagnat. (2016). Input Specificity and the Propagation of Idisdyncratic Shocks in Production Networks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1543-1592.
Berkman, Jona, & Soderstrom. (2022). Firm-Specific Climate Risk and Market Valuation. Working paper.
Berry. (1994). Reviewed Work(s) Economics, Organization & Management. by P. Milgrom and J. Roberts. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(2), 183-185.
Bettis, Bizjak, Coles, & Kalpathy. (2018). Performance-Vesting Provisions in Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66(1), 194-221.
Bouwens, & Lent. (2007). Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4), 667-697.
Briffa, Jones, & Hulme. (1994). Summer Moisture Variability Across Europe, 1892–1991: An Analysis Based on the Palmer Drought Severity Index. International Journal of Climatology, 14(5), 475-506.
Briffa, Schrier, & Jones. (2009). Wet and Dry Summers in Europe Since 1750: Evidence of Increasing Drought. International Journal of Climatology, 29(13), 1894-1905.
Bruce, Skovoroda, Fattorusso, & Buck. (2007). Executive Bonus and Firm Performance in the UK. Long Range Planning, 40, 280-294.
Bryan, Hwang, Klein, & Lilien. (2000). Compensation of Outside Directors: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Determinants. Working paper.
Burke, Hsiang, & Miguel. (2015). Global Non-Linear Effect of Temperature on Economic Production. Nature, 527(7577), 235-239.
Campbell, Chen, Dhaliwal, Lu, & Steele. (2014). The Information Content of Mandatory Risk Factor Disclosures in Corporate Filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 396-455.
Chaney, Sraer, & Thesmar. (2012). The Collateral Channel: How Real Estate Shocks Affect Corporate Investment. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2381-2409.
Chava. (2014). Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223-2247.
Comprix, & Muller. (2006). Asymmetric Treatment of Reported Pension Expense and Income Amounts in CEO Cash Compensation Calculations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 385-416.
Conyon, & He. (2004). Compensation Committees and CEO Compensation Incentives in US Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 35-56.
Coughlan, & Schmidt. (1985). Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 43-66.
Coval, & Moskowitz. (1999). Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045-2073.
Covington, & Thamotheram. (2015). The Case for Forceful Stewardship (Part 1): The Financial Risk from Global Warming. Working paper.
Cyert, Kang, & Kumar. (2002). Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence. Management Science, 48(4), 453-469.
Dai. (2011). Drought Under Global Warming: A Review. WIREs Climate Change, 2(1), 45-65.
Dai, Trenberth, & Qian. (2004). A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: Relationship with Soil Moisture and Effects of Surface Warming. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(6), 1117-1130.
Dechow. (2006). Asymmetric Sensitivity of CEO Cash Compensation to Stock Returns: A Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 193-202.
Dechow, Huson, & Sloan. (1994). The Effect of Restructuring Charges on Executives' Cash Compensation. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 138.
Dell, Jones, & Olken. (2009). Temperature and Income: Reconciling New Cross-Sectional and Panel Estimates. The American Economic Review, 99(2), 198-204.
Dell, Jones, & Olken. (2012). Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4(3), 66-95.
Ding, Hayes, & Widhalm. (2011). Measuring Economic Impacts of Drought: A Review and Discussion. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 434-446.
Ding, Schoengold, & Tadesse. (2009). The Impact of Weather Extremes on Agricultural Production Methods: Does Drought Increase Adoption of Conservation Tillage Practices? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34(3), 395-411.
Dyreng, & Lindsey. (2009). Using Financial Accounting Data to Examine the Effect of Foreign Operations Located in Tax Havens and Other Countries on U. S. Multinational Firms' Tax Rates. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(5), 1283-1316.
Fisher, Hanemann, Roberts, & Schlenker. (2012). The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Output and Random Fluctuations in Weather: Comment. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3749-3760.
Foltz, & Traore. (2018). Temperatures, Productivity, and Firm Competitiveness in Developing Countries: Evidence From Africa. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Fuss. (2016). Substantial Risk for Financial Assets. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 659-660.
Gaver, & Gaver. (1998). The Relation between Nonrecurring Accounting Transactions and CEO Cash Compensation. The Accounting Review, 73(2), 235-253.
Gray, & Cannella. (1997). The Role of Risk in Executive Compensation. Journal of Management, 23(4), 517-540.
Grundy, & Petry. (2022). Understanding Risk Disclosures and Exposures: Insights from a Novel Measure of Information Content.
Hao, AghaKouchak, Nakhjiri, & Farahmand. (2014). Global Integrated Drought Monitoring and Prediction System. Scientific Data, 1(1), 140001.
Hao, AghaKouchak, & Phillips. (2013). Changes in Concurrent Monthly Precipitation and Temperature Extremes. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 034014.
Hilary, & Hui. (2009). Does Religion Matter in Corporate Decision Making in America? Journal of Financial Economics, 93(3), 455-473.
Holthausen, Larcker, & Sloan. (1995). Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 29-74.
Hsu, & Liao. (2013). Earnings Quality and Pay-Performance Sensitivity: Evidence from Employee Profit-Sharing Bonus in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Management Review, 18(3), 275-299.
Huang, Kerstein, & Wang. (2018). The Impact of Climate Risk on Firm Performance and Financing Choices: An International Comparison. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(5), 633-656.
Huntington. (1915). Civilization and Climate. Yale University Press.
Indjejikian, & Nanda. (2002). Executive Target Bonuses and What They Imply about Performance Standards. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 793-819.
IvkoviĆ, & Weisbenner. (2005). Local Does as Local Is: Information Content of the Geography of Individual Investors' Common Stock Investments. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 267-306.
Jensen, & Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, & Murphy. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264.
Jones, & Olken. (2010). Climate Shocks and Exports. American Economic Review, 100(2), 454-459.
Klein. (2002). Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 435-452.
Korniotis, & Kumar. (2013). State-Level Business Cycles and Local Return Predictability. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1037-1096.
Kreft, & Eckstein. (2013). Global Climate Risk Index 2014: Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-Related Loss Events in 2012 and 1993 to 2012. Germanwatch. 2014.
Lambert, & Larcker. (1987). An Analysis of the use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 25, 85-125.
Leonard. (1990). Executive Pay and Firm Performance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 13S-29S.
Leonard, Westra, Phatak, Lambert, Hurk, McInnes, Risbey, Schuster, Jakob, & Smith. (2014). A Compound Event Framework for Understanding Extreme Impacts. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1), 113-128.
Leone, Wu, & Zimmerman. (2006). Asymmetric Sensitivity of CEO Cash Compensation to Stock Returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 167-192.
Lesk, Rowhani, & Ramankutty. (2016). Influence of Extreme Weather Disasters on Global Crop Production. Nature, 529(7584), 84-87.
Lewellen, Loderer, Martin, & Blum. (1992). Executive Compensation and the Performance of the Firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13(1), 65-74.
Lilling. (2006). The Link Between CEO Compensation and Firm Performance: Does Simultaneity Matter? Atlantic Economic Journal, 34(1), 101-114.
Lin, Kuo, & Wang. (2013). Chief Executive Compensation: An Empirical Study of Fat Cat CEOs. International Journal of Business & Finance Research, 7(2), 27-42.
Lippert, & Moore. (1994). Compensation Contracts of Chief Executive Officers: Determinants of Pay-Performance Sensitivity. Journal of Financial Research, 17(3), 321-332.
Lloyd-Hughes, & Saunders. (2002). A Drought Climatology for Europe. International Journal of Climatology, 22(13), 1571-1592.
Main, & Johnston. (1993). Remuneration Committees and Corporate Governance. Accounting and Business Research, 23(sup1), 351-362.
Matolcsy, & Wright. (2011). CEO Compensation Structure and Firm Performance. Accounting and Finance, 51(3), 745-763.
Mehran. (1995). Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163-184.
Milliron. (2000). Board of Director Incentive Alignment and the Design of Executive Compensation Contracts. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago.
Mishra, McConaughy, & Gobeli. (2000). Effectiveness of CEO Pay-for-Performance. Review of Financial Economics, 9(1), 1-13.
Murphy. (2000). Performance Standards in Incentive Contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 245-278.
Novy-Marx. (2014). Predicting Anomaly Performance with Politics, the Weather, Global Warming, Sunspots, and the Stars. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 137-146.
Ozkan. (2007). Do Corporate Governance Mechanisms Influence CEO Compensation? An Empirical Investigation of UK Companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 17(5), 349-364.
Palmer. (2006). Meteorological drought. Research Paper No. 45. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Weather Bureau.
Pankratz, Bauer, & Derwall. (2023). Climate Change, Firm Performance, and Investor Surprises. Working paper.
Petra, & Dorata. (2008). Corporate Governance and Chief Executive Officer Compensation. Corporate Governance, 8, 141-152.
Pilcher, Nadler, & Busch. (2002). Effects of Hot and Cold Temperature Exposure on Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Ergonomics, 45(10), 682-698.
Pirinsky, & Wang. (2006). Does Corporate Headquarters Location Matter for Stock Returns? The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1991-2015.
Rosen. (1990). Contracts and the Market for Executives. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sautner, Lent, Vilkov, & Zhang. (2023). Firm-Level Climate Change Exposure. The Journal of Finance, 78(3), 1449-1498.
Schlenker, & Roberts. (2009). Nonlinear Temperature Effects Indicate Severe Damages to U.S. Crop Yields under Climate Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15594-15598.
Seppanen, Fisk, & Lei. (2005). Effect of Temperature on Task Performance in Office Environment. LaBerkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Shalit, & Sankar. (1977). The Measurement of Firm Size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(3), 290-298.
Shaw, & Zhang. (2010). Is CEO Cash Compensation Punished for Poor Firm Performance? The Accountig Review, 85(3), 1065-1093.
Sloan. (1993). Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1), 55-100.
Smith, & Watts. (1992). The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 263-292.
Somanathan, Somanathan, Sudarshan, & Tewari. (2021). The Impact of Temperature on Productivity and Labor Supply: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing. Journal of Political Economy, 129(6), 1797-1827.
Starr. (2000). The Effects of Weather on Retail Sales. Working paper, The Federal Reserve Board.
Stern. (2008). The Economics of Climate Change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1-37.
Sun, & Cahan. (2009). The Effect of Compensation Committee Quality on the Association between CEO Cash Compensation and Accounting Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 193-207.
Tuzel, & Zhang. (2017). Local Risk, Local Factors, and Asset Prices. The Journal of Finance, 72(1), 325-370.
Verdon-Kidd, & Kiem. (2010). Quantifying Drought Risk in a Nonstationary Climate. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11(4), 1019-1031.
Watts, & Zimmerman. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156.
Wright, Ferris, Sarin, & Awasthi. (1996). Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder, and Institutional Equity Ownership on Firm Risk Taking. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 441-463.
Xie. (2017). Heterogeneous Firms under Regional Temperature Shocks: Exit and Reallocation, with Evidence from Indonesia. Economic Development and Cultural Change.
Zhang, Deschenes, Meng, & Zhang. (2017). Temperature Effects on Productivity and Factor Reallocation: Evidence from a Half Million Chinese Manufacturing Plants. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zivin, & Neidell. (2014). Temperature and the Allocation of Time: Implications for Climate Change. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(1), 1-26.
Zou, Zhai, & Zhang. (2005). Variations in Droughts over China: 1951–2003. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L04707.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89910-
dc.description.abstract隨氣候變遷加劇,氣候風險對公司營運及績效的負面影響,逐漸受到股東重視,由於所有權與經營權分離產生之代理問題,使股東無法取得經理人管理行為的完整資訊,相較於被動的監督手法,根據代理理論,有效的薪酬合約應被設計為減緩代理問題之工具,透過經理人薪酬與公司績效的連結,增加經理人對氣候風險管理的誘因,但同時代理理論也強調,激勵效果須與經理人的薪酬保障取得平衡,因此當公司面臨較大氣候風險時,經理人承受的薪酬風險增加,此時增加薪酬績效敏感度(Pay Performance Sensitivity, PPS)可能非最適作法。此外,低績效公司對於氣候風險管理的需求相對迫切,除了因為氣候風險可能使財務績效惡化,並且在2008年金融海嘯後,經理人薪酬與公司績效連結性再次掀起討論,股東對於公司給予低績效經理人的保護機制,引發肥貓爭議。因此,本研究以1994至2021年美國公司為樣本,採用美國各州年度的帕默爾乾旱指數(Palmer Drought Index, PDSI)衡量公司面臨之氣候風險,實證結果發現,氣候風險會使低績效公司增加薪酬績效敏感度,符合代理理論預期之激勵效果,但此正向反應只集中在公司面臨輕度(Mild)乾旱風險時,隨氣候風險增加至嚴重(Severe)或極端(Extreme)程度時,經理人面臨的薪酬風險將削弱激勵效果,使公司面臨較大氣候風險時,並不會顯著提升薪酬績效敏感度,同樣符合代理理論之預期。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAs climate change intensifies, the negative impact of climate risks on corporate operations and performance has gained substantial concerns from stakeholders. Due to the agency problem, shareholders cannot obtain complete information about managerial behavior. According to agency theory, compensation contracts should be designed as a tool to mitigate agency problems. When executive compensation is tied to performance, managers’ incentives to manage climate risk can increase. However, agency theory also emphasizes the balance between incentive effects and compensation protection. Therefore, when a company faces greater climate risks, increasing pay-performance sensitivity (PPS) may not be optimal as it increases the compensation risk for executives. Furthermore, companies with worse performance have a relatively urgent need for climate risk management, as climate risks may worsen their financial performance. Also, after the 2008 financial crisis, discussions on the link between executive compensation and performance were reignited, and protection mechanisms for low-performing executives sparked "fat cat" controversies. This study uses US companies from 1994 to 2021 as a sample and uses the Palmer Drought Index (PDSI) to measure climate risks. The empirical results show that climate risks increase PPS for low-performing companies, consistent with the incentive effect predicted by agency theory. However, the positive relation between drought risk and PPS in firms with weaker performance only concentrates on companies facing mild drought risks. When climate risks increase to severe or extreme levels, the compensation risk faced by executives will weaken the incentive effect. Therefore, when a company with worse performance faces severe or extreme climate risks, it may not significantly increase PPS, which is also in line with the expectations of agency theory.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:38:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:38:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 前言 1
第二章 文獻回顧及假說推論 4
第一節 氣候風險對總體經濟的影響 4
第二節 氣候風險對公司個體的影響 5
第三節 由薪酬政策著手之氣候風險管理 6
第四節 薪酬績效敏感度的雙面效果 8
第五節 氣候風險的衡量 10
第六節 建立假說 10
第三章 研究設計及變數說明 12
第四章 實證結果 17
第一節 樣本篩選 17
第二節 敘述性統計分析 18
第三節 相關係數分析 23
第四節 多元迴歸分析 24
第五章 其他測試 31
第一節 敏感性測試 31
第二節 分組測試 35
第六章 結論及建議 45
第一節 研究結論 45
第二節 研究限制與建議 45
第七章 參考文獻 46
附錄 變數定義 52
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject帕默爾乾旱風險指數zh_TW
dc.subject氣候風險zh_TW
dc.subject代理理論zh_TW
dc.subject薪酬績效敏感度zh_TW
dc.subjectclimate risksen
dc.subjectpay-performance sensitivityen
dc.subjectPDSIen
dc.subjectagency theoryen
dc.title乾旱風險對低績效公司薪酬績效敏感度的影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Drought Risk on Pay-Performance Sensitivity of Companies with Weak Performanceen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee廖芝嫻;洪聖閔zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChih-Hsien Liao;Sheng-Min Hungen
dc.subject.keyword氣候風險,帕默爾乾旱風險指數,薪酬績效敏感度,代理理論,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordclimate risks,PDSI,pay-performance sensitivity,agency theory,en
dc.relation.page52-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202301817-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-07-25-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學系-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf1.77 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved