Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89848
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張伯茹zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorPo-Ju Changen
dc.contributor.author孫培綸zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorPei-Lun Sunen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T16:22:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-10-
dc.identifier.citation朱沛婕. (2008). 貓空纜車對貓空地區之觀光經濟影響分析. 國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文.
江彥政, 張俊彥, & 歐聖榮. (2011). 森林步道環境特性對心理評價反應之影響. 戶外遊憩研究, 24(2), 75-100.
吳世光, & 陳建和. (2002). 影像式虛擬實境之發展及其在觀光產業應用之研究. 觀光研究學報, 8(1), 109-125.
林亦杰. (2009). 地方文化產業治理機制評估研究: 以貓空茶文化產業為例.
南投縣政府.(2010). 南投好茶 傳承與創新. 南投:南投縣政府.
莊振鈺. (2018). 靜態與動態消費者型感官品評技術於臺灣特色茶感官特性之評估.
許婷婷, & 馬敏元. (2014). 從台南小吃涉入程度探討食器對於味感的影響. 感性學報, 2(1), 04-33.
陳婷芳, 陳惠美, & 陸洛. (2012). 景觀知覺與景觀偏好對餐廳消費者行為意圖之影響. 戶外遊憩研究, 25(2), 1-24.
廖文蘭, 林希軒, & 方進義. (2017). 消費者美感生活型態對景觀餐廳願付額外價格差異之研究. 戶外遊憩研究, 30(3), 111-153.
廖文蘭. (2022). 景觀餐廳顧客認知價值對行為意圖與額外願付價格之影響. 戶外遊憩研究, 35(1), 85-128.
廖婉婷, 鄭佳昆, & 林晏州. (2013). 不同地點標籤對自然度感受及偏好影響之研究. 戶外遊憩研究, 26(4), 31-56.
廖紫均. (2014). 地方特色茶與茶產業的延續與傳承: 以木柵鐵觀音茶區為例. 華人應用人類學學刊, 3(2), 45-72.
劉伯康, & 莊朝琪. (2014). 食品感官品評: 理論與實務. 新北市: 新文京.
鄭培凱、朱自振,《中國歷代茶書匯編》校注本上,香港,商務印書館,2007。
賴正南. (2014). 年輕人飲茶狀況調查及其推廣應用. 第11屆中華茶文化研討會. 國立高雄餐旅大學.
簡立賢, 紀淑怡, 戴錦稔, & 黃正宗. (2020). 享用與敘述性品評指標評估與分析-臺灣高山茶應用. 調查研究-方法與應用, (44), 131-170.
簡郁芳. (2012). 臺灣茶文化觀光發展潛力評估之研究.
Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 22(4), 328-339.
Baker, J., Levy, M., & Grewal, D. (1992). An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions. Journal of retailing, 68(4), 445.
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002). The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of marketing, 66(2), 120-141.
Batat, W., Peter, P. C., Moscato, E. M., Castro, I. A., Chan, S., Chugani, S., & Muldrow, A. (2019). The experiential pleasure of food: A savoring journey to food well-being. Journal of Business Research, 100, 392-399.
Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., ... & Jonides, J. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of affective disorders, 140(3), 300-305.
Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 249-259.
Binter, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57-71.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Limb, M. (1988). People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban studies, 25(6), 455-473.
Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987). Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: an alternative pre-test-market evaluation procedure. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 389-395.
Canetti, L., Bachar, E., & Berry, E. M. (2002). Food and emotion. Behavioural processes, 60(2), 157-164.
Chen, Y., Huang, A. X., Faber, I., Makransky, G., & Perez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2020). Assessing the influence of visual-taste congruency on perceived sweetness and product liking in immersive VR. Foods, 9(4), 465.
Cheskin, L. (1957). How to predict what people will buy.
Clarke, P., Fisher, G., House, J., Smith, J., & Weir, D. (2008). Guide to content of the HRS psychosocial leave-behind participant lifestyle questionnaires: 2004 & 2006. Documentation Report Version 2.0.
Cornelio, P., Dawes, C., Maggioni, E., Bernardo, F., Schwalk, M., Mai, M., ... & Obrist, M. (2022). Virtually tasty: An investigation of the effect of ambient lighting and 3D-shaped taste stimuli on taste perception in virtual reality. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 30, 100626.
Cornil, Y., & Chandon, P. (2016). Pleasure as an ally of healthy eating? Contrasting visceral and Epicurean eating pleasure and their association with portion size preferences and wellbeing. Appetite, 104, 52-59.
Crofton, E. C., Botinestean, C., Fenelon, M., & Gallagher, E. (2019). Potential applications for virtual and augmented reality technologies in sensory science. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 56, 102178.
Crofton, E., Murray, N., & Botinestean, C. (2021). Exploring the effects of immersive virtual reality environments on sensory perception of beef steaks and chocolate. Foods, 10(6), 1154.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS quarterly, 39(2), 297-316.
Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34-57.
Edwards, J. S. A., Meiselman, H. L., Edwards, A., & Lesher, L. (2003). The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods. Food Quality and Preference, 14(8), 647–652.
Ferrer‐Garcia, M., Gutierrez‐Maldonado, J., Treasure, J., & Vilalta‐Abella, F. (2015). Craving for food in virtual reality scenarios in non‐clinical sample: Analysis of its relationship with body mass index and eating disorder symptoms. European Eating Disorders Review, 23(5), 371-378.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
Förster, J. (2011). Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 364.
García-Segovia, P., Harrington, R. J., & Seo, H. (2015). Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 1–7.
Giezenaar, C., & Hort, J. (2021). A narrative review of the impact of digital immersive technology on affective and sensory responses during product testing in digital eating contexts. Food Research International, 150, 110804.
Götz, O.; Liehr-Gobbers, K.; Krafft, M. Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications; Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 691–711.
Grewal, D., Baker, J., Levy, M., & Voss, G. B. (2003). The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail stores. Journal of retailing, 79(4), 259-268.
Gutjar, S., de Graaf, C., Kooijman, V., de Wijk, R. A., Nys, A., Ter Horst, G. J., & Jager, G. (2015). The role of emotions in food choice and liking. Food Research International, 76, 216-223.
Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). A global p-erspect-ivie. Kennesaw: Kennesaw State University.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black. Multivariate data analysis.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hampe, G. D., & Noe, F. P. (1983). A study in the aesthetics of boundaries: Fences along a National Parkway. Journal of Environment Management, 17, 239-248.
Hathaway, D., & Simons, C. T. (2017). The impact of multiple immersion levels on data quality and panelist engagement for the evaluation of cookies under a preparation-based scenario. Food Quality and Preference, 57, 114-125.
Heymann, H., & Lawless, H. T. (2013). Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Springer Science & Business Media.
Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the consumer: The science and art of the value creation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 100-114.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 92–101.
Holthuysen, N. T., Vrijhof, M. N., de Wijk, R. A., & Kremer, S. (2017). “Welcome on board”: Overall liking and just‐about‐right ratings of airplane meals in three different consumption contexts—laboratory, re‐created airplane, and actual airplane. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32(2), e12254.
Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2005). Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Journal of marketing, 69(2), 84-96.
Huang, F., Huang, J., & Wan, X. (2019). Influence of virtual color on taste: Multisensory integration between virtual and real worlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 168-174.
Hull IV, R. B., & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 323-345.
Ileri-Gurel, E., Pehlivanoglu, B., & Dogan, M. (2013). Effect of acute stress on taste perception: in relation with baseline anxiety level and body weight. Chemical senses, 38(1), 27-34.
Ittelson, W. H. (1973). Environment and cognition. Seminar Press.
Jeong, E., & Jang, S. S. (2019). Price premiums for organic menus at restaurants: What is an acceptable level?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 117-127.
Jolliffe, L., & Aslam, M. (2009). Tea heritage tourism: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 4(4), 331-344.
Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 176-187.
Junker, B., & Buchecker, M. (2008). Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 141-154.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Island press.
Kemp, S. E., Ng, M., Hollowood, T., & Hort, J. (2018). Introduction to descriptive analysis. Descriptive analysis in sensory evaluation, 1.
Kong, Y., Sharma, C., Kanala, M., Thakur, M., Li, L., Xu, D., ... & Torrico, D. D. (2020). Virtual reality and immersive environments on sensory perception of chocolate products: A preliminary study. Foods, 9(4), 515.
Köster, E. P. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food quality and preference, 20(2), 70-82.
Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of retailing, 49(4), 48-64.
Krishna, A. (1991). Effect of dealing patterns on consumer perceptions of deal frequency and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 441-451.
Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, Kowalewski T, Jonnadula S, Mercer LD, Khorsand D, Andros J, Hannaford B, Satava RM. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2013;216:1181-92.
Li, X. E., Jervis, S. M., & Drake, M. A. (2015). Examining Extrinsic fac- tors that influence product acceptance : A review. Journal of Food Science, 80(5), 901–909.
Lichters, M., Mo ̈slein, R., Sarstedt, M., & Scharf, A. (2021). Segmenting consumers based on sensory acceptance tests in sensory labs, immersive environments, and natural consumption settings. Food Quality and Preference, 89, 104138.
Low, J. Y., Diako, C., Lin, V. H., Yeon, L. J., & Hort, J. (2021). Investigating the relative merits of using a mixed reality context for measuring affective response and predicting tea break snack choice. Food Research International, 150, 110718.
Lucas, F., & Bellisle, F. (1987). The measurement of food preferences in humans: do taste-and-spit tests predict consumption?. Physiology & behavior, 39(6), 739-743.
Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1-11.
Madge, C. (1997). Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 88(3), 237-250.
Meiselman, H. (1996). The contextual basis for food acceptance, food choice and food intake: the food, the situation and the individual. In H. Meiselman & H. MacFie (Eds.), Food choice acceptance and consumption (pp. 239–260). Blackie Academic & Professional, an imprint of Chapman & Hall.
Meiselman, H. L. (2009). How does meal context affect food pref- erences? In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and prac- tice: Interdisciplinary research and business applications (p. 132). Elsevier.
Meiselman, H. L., & Kramer, F. M. (1994). The role of context in behavioral effects of foods. In B. M. Marriot (Ed.), Food Components to Enhance performance: An evaluation of potential performance-enhancing food components for operational rations. Committee on Military Nutrition Research, Food and Nutrition Board. (pp. 137–155). National Academies Press (US).
Meiselman, H., Johnson, J. L., Reeve, W., & Crouch, J. E. (2000). Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite, 35(3), 231–237.
Miao, L., & Mattila, A. S. (2007). How and how much to reveal? The effects of price transparency on consumers' price perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31(4), 530-545.
Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., & Deutsch, J. E. (2009). Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke, 40(1), 169-174.
Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers' preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and behavior, 15(5), 589-614.
Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape journal, 14(2), 161-170.
Noel, C., & Dando, R. (2015). The effect of emotional state on taste perception. Appetite, 95, 89-95.
North, M. M., & North, S. M. (2016). A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods., 464-465.
Nygård, M., & Lie, C. L. (2020). How changes in environmental colour hue affect taste expectations, perceptions, and product preferences at different levels of attention towards atmospheric cues: A mixed experimental design (Master's thesis, Handelshøyskolen BI).
Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of environmental management, 90(1), 375-383.
Oliver, G., & Wardle, J. (1999). Perceived effects of stress on food choice. Physiology & behavior, 66(3), 511-515.
Osgood, C.E. (1969). On the Whys and Where forces of E.P. and A.J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 12,189-193.
Perkins, D. D., Meeks, J. W., & Taylor, R. B. (1992). The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(1), 21-34.
Picket, B., & Dando, R. (2019). Environmental immersion’s influence on hedonics, perceived appropriateness, and willingness to pay in alcoholic beverages. Foods, 8(2), 42.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business Press.
Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of emotion (pp. 3-33). Academic press.
Prescott, J. (2013). Taste matters: Why we like the foods we do. Reaktion Books.
Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape?. Journal of environmental psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types?. Environment and behavior, 33(1), 93-106.
Rao, A. R., & Bergen, M. E. (1992). Price premium variations as a consequence of buyers' lack of information. Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 412-423.
Reynolds, F. D., & Wells, W. D. (1977). Consumer behavior. New York:McGrraw-Hill Book Company. p29-35
Rozin, P., & Tuorila, H. (1993). Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance. Food quality and preference, 4(1-2), 11-20.
Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. S. (2010). Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast‐casual restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
Schroeder, H. W. (1986). Psychological value of urban trees: Measurement, meaning and imagination. In Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference. American Forestry Association, Washington, DC,(1986) (pp. 55-60).
Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2009). Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2889-2899.
Sheets, V. L., & Manzer, C. D. (1991). Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: Some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 285-304.
Simonič, T. (2003). Preference and perceived naturalness in visual perception of naturalistic landscape. University of Ljubljana, 82(2), 369-387
Sinesio, F., Saba, A., Peparaio, M., Saggia Civitelli, E., Paoletti, F., & Moneta, E. (2018). Capturing consumer perception of vegetable freshness in a simulated real-life taste situation. Food Research International, 105, 764–771.
Singh, M. (2014). Mood, food, and obesity. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 925.
Smardon, R. C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban planning, 15(1-2), 85-106.
Spence, C. (2013). Multisensory flavour perception. Current Biology, 23(9), R365-R369.
Spence, C. (2015). Multisensory flavor perception. Cell, 161(1), 24-35.
Stelick, A., Penano, A. G., Riak, A. C., & Dando, R. (2018). Dynamic context sensory testing–a proof of concept study bringing virtual reality to the sensory booth. Journal of Food Science, 83(8), 2047– 2051.
Taylor, R. B., Shumaker, S. A., & Gottfredson, S. D. (1985). Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 2(4), 261-275.
Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and urban planning, 69(4), 403-416.
Torrico, D. D., Sharma, C., Dong, W., Fuentes, S., Gonzalez Viejo, C., & Dunshea, F. R. (2021). Virtual reality environments on the sensory acceptability and emotional responses of no- and full-sugar chocolate. LWT, 137, 110383.
Tuorila, H., Hyvönen, L., & Vainio, L. (1994). Pleasantness of cookies, juice and their combinations rated in brief taste tests and following ad libitum consumption. Journal of Sensory Studies, 9(2), 205-216.
Tveit, M., Ode, Å ., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229-255.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer, Boston, MA.
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. The biophilia hypothesis, 7, 73-137.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
Ulrich, R.S. (1986). Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.13, 29-44.
van Bergen, G., Zandstra, E. H., Kaneko, D., Dijksterhuis, G. B., & de Wijk, R. A. (2021). Sushi at the beach: Effects of congruent and incongruent immersive contexts on food evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 91, 104193.
Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration:(How) are they related?. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 135-146.
Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban forestry & urban greening, 6(4), 199-212.
Vlosky, R. P., Ozanne, L. K., & Fontenot, R. J. (1999). A conceptual model of US consumer willingness‐to‐pay for environmentally certified wood products. Journal of Consumer Marketing.
Wadhera, D., & Capaldi-Phillips, E. D. (2014). A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eating behaviors, 15(1), 132-143.
Wansink, B., & Van Ittersum, K. (2012). Fast food restaurant lighting and music can reduce calorie intake and increase satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 228-232.
Willner, P., & Healy, S. (1994). Decreased hedonic responsiveness during a brief depressive mood swing. Journal of affective disorders, 32(1), 13-20.
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
Yildirim, K., Yildirim Kaya, N. N., & Olmus, F. (2020). The effects of indoor plants on customers' shopping decisions in a restaurant environment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(12), 1301-1314.
Zandstra, E. H., Kaneko, D., Dijksterhuis, G. B., Vennik, E., & De Wijk, R. A. (2020). Implementing immersive technologies in consumer testing: Liking and Just-About- Right ratings in a laboratory, immersive simulated caf ́e and real caf ́e. Food Quality and Preference, 84, 103934.

 
英文文獻
1. Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 22(4), 328-339.
2. Baker, J., Levy, M., & Grewal, D. (1992). An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions. Journal of retailing, 68(4), 445.
3. Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002). The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of marketing, 66(2), 120-141.
4. Batat, W., Peter, P. C., Moscato, E. M., Castro, I. A., Chan, S., Chugani, S., & Muldrow, A. (2019). The experiential pleasure of food: A savoring journey to food well-being. Journal of Business Research, 100, 392-399.
5. Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., ... & Jonides, J. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of affective disorders, 140(3), 300-305.
6. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 249-259.
7. Binter, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57-71.
8. Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Limb, M. (1988). People, parks and the urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban studies, 25(6), 455-473.
9. Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987). Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: an alternative pre-test-market evaluation procedure. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 389-395.
10. Canetti, L., Bachar, E., & Berry, E. M. (2002). Food and emotion. Behavioural processes, 60(2), 157-164.
11. Chen, Y., Huang, A. X., Faber, I., Makransky, G., & Perez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2020). Assessing the influence of visual-taste congruency on perceived sweetness and product liking in immersive VR. Foods, 9(4), 465.
12. Cheskin, L. (1957). How to predict what people will buy.
13. Clarke, P., Fisher, G., House, J., Smith, J., & Weir, D. (2008). Guide to content of the HRS psychosocial leave-behind participant lifestyle questionnaires: 2004 & 2006. Documentation Report Version 2.0.
14. Cornelio, P., Dawes, C., Maggioni, E., Bernardo, F., Schwalk, M., Mai, M., ... & Obrist, M. (2022). Virtually tasty: An investigation of the effect of ambient lighting and 3D-shaped taste stimuli on taste perception in virtual reality. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 30, 100626.
15. Cornil, Y., & Chandon, P. (2016). Pleasure as an ally of healthy eating? Contrasting visceral and Epicurean eating pleasure and their association with portion size preferences and wellbeing. Appetite, 104, 52-59.
16. Crofton, E. C., Botinestean, C., Fenelon, M., & Gallagher, E. (2019). Potential applications for virtual and augmented reality technologies in sensory science. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 56, 102178.
17. Crofton, E., Murray, N., & Botinestean, C. (2021). Exploring the effects of immersive virtual reality environments on sensory perception of beef steaks and chocolate. Foods, 10(6), 1154.
18. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS quarterly, 39(2), 297-316.
19. Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34-57.
20. Edwards, J. S. A., Meiselman, H. L., Edwards, A., & Lesher, L. (2003). The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods. Food Quality and Preference, 14(8), 647–652.
21. Ferrer‐Garcia, M., Gutierrez‐Maldonado, J., Treasure, J., & Vilalta‐Abella, F. (2015). Craving for food in virtual reality scenarios in non‐clinical sample: Analysis of its relationship with body mass index and eating disorder symptoms. European Eating Disorders Review, 23(5), 371-378.
22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
23. Förster, J. (2011). Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 364.
24. García-Segovia, P., Harrington, R. J., & Seo, H. (2015). Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 1–7.
25. Giezenaar, C., & Hort, J. (2021). A narrative review of the impact of digital immersive technology on affective and sensory responses during product testing in digital eating contexts. Food Research International, 150, 110804.
26. Götz, O.; Liehr-Gobbers, K.; Krafft, M. Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications; Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 691–711.
27. Grewal, D., Baker, J., Levy, M., & Voss, G. B. (2003). The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail stores. Journal of retailing, 79(4), 259-268.
28. Gutjar, S., de Graaf, C., Kooijman, V., de Wijk, R. A., Nys, A., Ter Horst, G. J., & Jager, G. (2015). The role of emotions in food choice and liking. Food Research International, 76, 216-223.
29. Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). A global p-erspect-ivie. Kennesaw: Kennesaw State University.
30. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
31. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
32. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black. Multivariate data analysis.
33. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
34. Hampe, G. D., & Noe, F. P. (1983). A study in the aesthetics of boundaries: Fences along a National Parkway. Journal of Environment Management, 17, 239-248.
35. Hathaway, D., & Simons, C. T. (2017). The impact of multiple immersion levels on data quality and panelist engagement for the evaluation of cookies under a preparation-based scenario. Food Quality and Preference, 57, 114-125.
36. Heymann, H., & Lawless, H. T. (2013). Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Springer Science & Business Media.
37. Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the consumer: The science and art of the value creation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 100-114.
38. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 92–101.
39. Holthuysen, N. T., Vrijhof, M. N., de Wijk, R. A., & Kremer, S. (2017). “Welcome on board”: Overall liking and just‐about‐right ratings of airplane meals in three different consumption contexts—laboratory, re‐created airplane, and actual airplane. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32(2), e12254.
40. Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2005). Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Journal of marketing, 69(2), 84-96.
41. Huang, F., Huang, J., & Wan, X. (2019). Influence of virtual color on taste: Multisensory integration between virtual and real worlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 168-174.
42. Hull IV, R. B., & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 323-345.
43. Ileri-Gurel, E., Pehlivanoglu, B., & Dogan, M. (2013). Effect of acute stress on taste perception: in relation with baseline anxiety level and body weight. Chemical senses, 38(1), 27-34.
44. Ittelson, W. H. (1973). Environment and cognition. Seminar Press.
45. Jeong, E., & Jang, S. S. (2019). Price premiums for organic menus at restaurants: What is an acceptable level?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 117-127.
46. Jolliffe, L., & Aslam, M. (2009). Tea heritage tourism: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 4(4), 331-344.
47. Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 176-187.
48. Junker, B., & Buchecker, M. (2008). Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 141-154.
49. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Island press.
50. Kemp, S. E., Ng, M., Hollowood, T., & Hort, J. (2018). Introduction to descriptive analysis. Descriptive analysis in sensory evaluation, 1.
51. Kong, Y., Sharma, C., Kanala, M., Thakur, M., Li, L., Xu, D., ... & Torrico, D. D. (2020). Virtual reality and immersive environments on sensory perception of chocolate products: A preliminary study. Foods, 9(4), 515.
52. Köster, E. P. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food quality and preference, 20(2), 70-82.
53. Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of retailing, 49(4), 48-64.
54. Krishna, A. (1991). Effect of dealing patterns on consumer perceptions of deal frequency and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 441-451.
55. Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, Kowalewski T, Jonnadula S, Mercer LD, Khorsand D, Andros J, Hannaford B, Satava RM. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2013;216:1181-92.
56. Li, X. E., Jervis, S. M., & Drake, M. A. (2015). Examining Extrinsic fac- tors that influence product acceptance : A review. Journal of Food Science, 80(5), 901–909.
57. Lichters, M., Mo ̈slein, R., Sarstedt, M., & Scharf, A. (2021). Segmenting consumers based on sensory acceptance tests in sensory labs, immersive environments, and natural consumption settings. Food Quality and Preference, 89, 104138.
58. Low, J. Y., Diako, C., Lin, V. H., Yeon, L. J., & Hort, J. (2021). Investigating the relative merits of using a mixed reality context for measuring affective response and predicting tea break snack choice. Food Research International, 150, 110718.
59. Lucas, F., & Bellisle, F. (1987). The measurement of food preferences in humans: do taste-and-spit tests predict consumption?. Physiology & behavior, 39(6), 739-743.
60. Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1-11.
61. Madge, C. (1997). Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 88(3), 237-250.
62. Meiselman, H. (1996). The contextual basis for food acceptance, food choice and food intake: the food, the situation and the individual. In H. Meiselman & H. MacFie (Eds.), Food choice acceptance and consumption (pp. 239–260). Blackie Academic & Professional, an imprint of Chapman & Hall.
63. Meiselman, H. L. (2009). How does meal context affect food pref- erences? In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and prac- tice: Interdisciplinary research and business applications (p. 132). Elsevier.
64. Meiselman, H. L., & Kramer, F. M. (1994). The role of context in behavioral effects of foods. In B. M. Marriot (Ed.), Food Components to Enhance performance: An evaluation of potential performance-enhancing food components for operational rations. Committee on Military Nutrition Research, Food and Nutrition Board. (pp. 137–155). National Academies Press (US).
65. Meiselman, H., Johnson, J. L., Reeve, W., & Crouch, J. E. (2000). Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite, 35(3), 231–237.
66. Miao, L., & Mattila, A. S. (2007). How and how much to reveal? The effects of price transparency on consumers' price perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31(4), 530-545.
67. Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., & Deutsch, J. E. (2009). Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke, 40(1), 169-174.
68. Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers' preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and behavior, 15(5), 589-614.
69. Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape journal, 14(2), 161-170.
70. Noel, C., & Dando, R. (2015). The effect of emotional state on taste perception. Appetite, 95, 89-95.
71. North, M. M., & North, S. M. (2016). A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20.
72. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods., 464-465.
73. Nygård, M., & Lie, C. L. (2020). How changes in environmental colour hue affect taste expectations, perceptions, and product preferences at different levels of attention towards atmospheric cues: A mixed experimental design (Master's thesis, Handelshøyskolen BI).
74. Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of environmental management, 90(1), 375-383.
75. Oliver, G., & Wardle, J. (1999). Perceived effects of stress on food choice. Physiology & behavior, 66(3), 511-515.
76. Osgood, C.E. (1969). On the Whys and Where forces of E.P. and A.J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 12,189-193.
77. Perkins, D. D., Meeks, J. W., & Taylor, R. B. (1992). The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(1), 21-34.
78. Picket, B., & Dando, R. (2019). Environmental immersion’s influence on hedonics, perceived appropriateness, and willingness to pay in alcoholic beverages. Foods, 8(2), 42.
79. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business Press.
80. Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of emotion (pp. 3-33). Academic press.
81. Prescott, J. (2013). Taste matters: Why we like the foods we do. Reaktion Books.
82. Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape?. Journal of environmental psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
83. Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types?. Environment and behavior, 33(1), 93-106.
84. Rao, A. R., & Bergen, M. E. (1992). Price premium variations as a consequence of buyers' lack of information. Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 412-423.
85. Reynolds, F. D., & Wells, W. D. (1977). Consumer behavior. New York:McGrraw-Hill Book Company. p29-35
86. Rozin, P., & Tuorila, H. (1993). Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance. Food quality and preference, 4(1-2), 11-20.
87. Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. S. (2010). Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast‐casual restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
88. Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of marketing management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
89. Schroeder, H. W. (1986). Psychological value of urban trees: Measurement, meaning and imagination. In Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference. American Forestry Association, Washington, DC,(1986) (pp. 55-60).
90. Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2009). Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2889-2899.
91. Sheets, V. L., & Manzer, C. D. (1991). Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: Some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 285-304.
92. Simonič, T. (2003). Preference and perceived naturalness in visual perception of naturalistic landscape. University of Ljubljana, 82(2), 369-387
93. Sinesio, F., Saba, A., Peparaio, M., Saggia Civitelli, E., Paoletti, F., & Moneta, E. (2018). Capturing consumer perception of vegetable freshness in a simulated real-life taste situation. Food Research International, 105, 764–771.
94. Singh, M. (2014). Mood, food, and obesity. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 925.
95. Smardon, R. C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban planning, 15(1-2), 85-106.
96. Spence, C. (2013). Multisensory flavour perception. Current Biology, 23(9), R365-R369.
97. Spence, C. (2015). Multisensory flavor perception. Cell, 161(1), 24-35.
98. Stelick, A., Penano, A. G., Riak, A. C., & Dando, R. (2018). Dynamic context sensory testing–a proof of concept study bringing virtual reality to the sensory booth. Journal of Food Science, 83(8), 2047– 2051.
99. Taylor, R. B., Shumaker, S. A., & Gottfredson, S. D. (1985). Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime, and confidence. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 2(4), 261-275.
100. Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and urban planning, 69(4), 403-416.
101. Torrico, D. D., Sharma, C., Dong, W., Fuentes, S., Gonzalez Viejo, C., & Dunshea, F. R. (2021). Virtual reality environments on the sensory acceptability and emotional responses of no- and full-sugar chocolate. LWT, 137, 110383.
102. Tuorila, H., Hyvönen, L., & Vainio, L. (1994). Pleasantness of cookies, juice and their combinations rated in brief taste tests and following ad libitum consumption. Journal of Sensory Studies, 9(2), 205-216.
103. Tveit, M., Ode, Å ., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229-255.
104. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
105. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer, Boston, MA.
106. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. The biophilia hypothesis, 7, 73-137.
107. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
108. Ulrich, R.S. (1986). Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.13, 29-44.
109. van Bergen, G., Zandstra, E. H., Kaneko, D., Dijksterhuis, G. B., & de Wijk, R. A. (2021). Sushi at the beach: Effects of congruent and incongruent immersive contexts on food evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 91, 104193.
110. Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration:(How) are they related?. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 135-146.
111. Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban forestry & urban greening, 6(4), 199-212.
112. Vlosky, R. P., Ozanne, L. K., & Fontenot, R. J. (1999). A conceptual model of US consumer willingness‐to‐pay for environmentally certified wood products. Journal of Consumer Marketing.
113. Wadhera, D., & Capaldi-Phillips, E. D. (2014). A review of visual cues associated with food on food acceptance and consumption. Eating behaviors, 15(1), 132-143.
114. Wansink, B., & Van Ittersum, K. (2012). Fast food restaurant lighting and music can reduce calorie intake and increase satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 228-232.
115. Willner, P., & Healy, S. (1994). Decreased hedonic responsiveness during a brief depressive mood swing. Journal of affective disorders, 32(1), 13-20.
116. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
117. Yildirim, K., Yildirim Kaya, N. N., & Olmus, F. (2020). The effects of indoor plants on customers' shopping decisions in a restaurant environment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(12), 1301-1314.
118. Zandstra, E. H., Kaneko, D., Dijksterhuis, G. B., Vennik, E., & De Wijk, R. A. (2020). Implementing immersive technologies in consumer testing: Liking and Just-About- Right ratings in a laboratory, immersive simulated caf ́e and real caf ́e. Food Quality and Preference, 84, 103934.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89848-
dc.description.abstract飲食體驗以多種感官體驗之特殊情境,對食品的評價不僅是受味覺影響,也受環境、情緒等影響。餐廳環境即屬於飲食環境的一種,戶外環境亦為用餐體驗相當重要的環節,且可周邊景觀與植栽來營造氛圍,而知覺自然度為景觀知覺之一。但目前尚無戶外景觀餐廳環境感知研究以飲食體驗為情境。因台北市貓空地區之戶外景觀餐廳之自然與茶的連結,以及可使用現地自然資源營造環境氛圍,為合適探究知覺自然度與飲食體驗之情境。因此,本研究的研究背景將設定為貓空戶外景觀餐廳,探討不同知覺自然度對情緒體驗、景觀偏好、飲食體驗與願付額外價格之影響。並利用沉浸式虛擬實境以配合視覺與聽覺之情境沉浸體驗進行實驗,以及品評貓空特產茶作為味覺體驗。
研究結果指出,當受試者於情境為戶外景觀餐廳飲茶時,除了驗證知覺自然度顯著影響情緒體驗、景觀偏好,但其關係呈曲線;情緒體驗與景觀偏好則呈顯著正相關。知覺自然度、情緒體驗與景觀偏好亦顯著影響飲食體驗;且知覺自然度與味覺感知中之甘醇度呈顯著影響關係。進一步進行檢驗,亦發現正向情緒體驗與環境氛圍、愉悅度關係受景觀偏好部分中介。而在消費方面,景觀偏好、飲食體驗之環境氛圍、愉悅度與願付額外價格呈顯著影響關係。
由研究結果可知,當環境背景為戶外餐飲環境無過於人工或過於自然之環境,即知覺自然度適中狀態能營造較佳的環境氣氛並進而提升飲食體驗。可知人較傾向人為且以自然元素佈置營造氛圍的環境。且環境亦影響味覺的感知,在越為自然的環境中所品評的茶甘醇度越高。原因推測為人們在飲茶時因茶本身屬性或意象聯想與自然有所連結,使環境之自然程度與品評樣品的甘醇度間具有一致性。若喚起越多正向情緒進而提升對景觀的偏好與飲食體驗,因此在整頓環境與環境人工化以避免負向情緒產生的同時,營造能喚起正向情緒之景觀將為主要目標。而在此環境情境中,亦較期望或重視在其中的體驗。因此比起對品嚐食物的喜好,提升飲食環境的氛圍營造更能提高消費面向的願付額外價格。研究貢獻除了在學術方面提供環境心理學作為參考,在實務方面亦可提戶外景觀餐廳業者在環境氣氛營造與食品品評領域之環境影響方面作為參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDining experience is a special situation of multi-sensory experience. The evaluation of food is not only affected by taste, but also affected by environment and emotion. The restaurant environment is a kind of food environment, and the outdoor environment is also a very important part of the dining experience, and the surrounding landscape and plants can be used to create the atmosphere, and the perceived naturalness is one of the landscape perceptions. However, there is no research on the environmental perception of outdoor landscape restaurants with the dining experience as the context. Because of the connection between nature and tea in the outdoor landscape restaurant in Maokong District of Taipei City, and the use of local natural resources to create an environment, it is a suitable situation for exploring the perception of naturalness and food experience. Therefore, the research background of this study will be set as Maokong outdoor landscape restaurant, to explore the influence of different perceived naturalness on emotional experience, landscape preference, dining experience and willingness to pay extra price. And use the immersive virtual reality to conduct experiments with the visual and auditory situational immersion experience, and taste Maokong specialty tea as a taste experience.
The results of the study pointed out that when the subjects were drinking tea in an outdoor landscape restaurant, in addition to verifying that perceptual naturalness significantly affected emotional experience and landscape preference, the relationship was in a curve; emotional experience and landscape preference were significantly positively correlated. Perceived naturalness, emotional experience and landscape preference also significantly affect dining experience; and perceptual naturalness has a significant impact relationship with sweet aftertaste in tea sensory evaluation. After further inspection, it was also found that the relationship between positive emotional experience, environmental atmosphere, and pleasure was partially mediated by landscape preference. In terms of consumption, landscape preference, the environment and atmosphere of dining experience, pleasure and willingness to pay a price premium have a significant impact relationship.
It can be seen from the research results that when the environmental background is an outdoor dining environment that is not too artificial or too natural, that is, the state of moderate perceived naturalness can create a better environment and improve the dining experience. It can be seen that people tend to prefer artificial environments with natural elements to create an atmosphere. And the environment also affects the perception of taste. The more natural the environment, the higher the tea's sweet aftertaste. The reason is presumed to be that when people drink tea, they are connected with nature due to the attributes of tea itself or image associations, which makes the naturalness of the environment consistent with the sweet aftertaste of the tasting samples. If more positive emotions are aroused, the preference for landscape and dining experience will be enhanced. Therefore, while rectifying and artificializing the environment to avoid negative emotions, creating landscapes that can arouse positive emotions will be the main goal. And in this environment, the experience in it is expected or valued more. Therefore, compared with the preference for tasting food, improving the atmosphere of the dining environment can increase the willingness to pay extra price for consumption. The research contribution not only provides environmental psychology as a reference in the academic aspect, but also provides a reference for outdoor landscape restaurant operators in terms of environmental atmosphere creation and food evaluation in terms of environmental impact in the field of practice.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:22:53Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:22:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT III
謝辭 VI
目 錄 VII
表目錄 X
圖目錄 XII
壹、緒論 1
貳、文獻回顧 3
第一節 餐飲景觀環境 3
1.1 戶外餐飲環境 3
1.2 景觀茶餐廳特色 3
第二節 景觀知覺 4
2.1 知覺自然度與景觀偏好 4
第三節 飲食體驗 5
3.1 食物愉悅體驗 5
3.2 味覺感知 8
3.3 景觀知覺與飲食體驗 9
第四節 情緒體驗 10
4.1 情緒的意涵 10
4.2 情緒體驗、景觀知覺與飲食體驗 10
第五節 願付價格 11
5.1 願付額外價格 11
5.2 願付額外價格與情緒體驗、景觀知覺與飲食體驗 12
參、研究方法 14
第一節 研究架構及假設 14
1.1研究架構 14
1.2研究假設 14
第二節 研究設計 15
2.1 實驗對象 15
2.2 環境背景 16
2.3 使用工具 17
2.4 使用量表 20
第三節 實驗流程 21
第四節 分析方法 22
3.1 衡量模型 22
3.2 變異數分析 24
3.3 路徑分析 24
肆、分析結果 25
第一節 敘述性統計 25
第二節 衡量模型 25
2.1 因素分析 26
2.2 信度分析 26
2.3 收斂效度 26
2.4 共線性分析 26
第三節 變異數分析 27
第四節 假說驗證 29
4.1 假設一:知覺自然度影響情緒體驗 29
4.2 假設二:知覺自然度影響景觀偏好 31
4.3 假設三:知覺自然度影響飲食體驗 33
4.4 假設四:景觀偏好影響飲食體驗 36
4.5 假設五:情緒體驗影響景觀偏好 39
4.6 假設六:情緒體驗影響飲食體驗 41
4.7 情緒體驗、景觀偏好與飲食體驗中介關係 46
4.8 假設七:飲食體驗影響願付額外價格 48
4.9 假設八:景觀偏好影響願付額外價格 51
伍、結果討論與建議 54
第一節 知覺自然度、景觀偏好、情緒體驗與願付額外價格之間關係 54
第二節 知覺自然度、景觀偏好、情緒體驗、願付額外價格與飲食體驗之關係 55
第三節 研究貢獻 57
第四節 研究限制 57
參考文獻 58
附錄 70
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject飲食體驗zh_TW
dc.subject情緒體驗zh_TW
dc.subject景觀偏好zh_TW
dc.subject知覺自然度zh_TW
dc.subject沉浸式虛擬實境zh_TW
dc.subject茶葉品評zh_TW
dc.subjectDining Experienceen
dc.subjectImmersive Virtual Realityen
dc.subjectLandscape Preferenceen
dc.subjectPerceived Naturalnessen
dc.subjectTea Sensory Evaluationen
dc.subjectEmotional Experienceen
dc.title知覺自然度對情緒體驗、景觀偏好與飲食體驗 之影響:以在戶外景觀餐廳飲茶為情境zh_TW
dc.titleThe impact of perceived naturalness on emotional experience, landscape preference and the dining experience: drinking tea in an outdoor landscape restauranten
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林書妍;張俊彥;江彥政;林晏州zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShu-Yen Lin;Chun-Yen Chang;Yen-Cheng Chiang;Yann-Jou Linen
dc.subject.keyword知覺自然度,景觀偏好,情緒體驗,飲食體驗,茶葉品評,沉浸式虛擬實境,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPerceived Naturalness,Landscape Preference,Emotional Experience,Dining Experience,Tea Sensory Evaluation,Immersive Virtual Reality,en
dc.relation.page72-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202303632-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-11-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系-
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
30.16 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved