請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89842完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳瑀屏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Ping Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林潔玟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chieh-Wen Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:21:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Agres, S. J., & Dubitsky, T. M. (1996). Changing needs for brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(1), 21-30.
BAV GROUP INC. (2021). BRANDASSET VALUATOR. https://www.bavgroup.com/about-bav/brandasset-valuatorr Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286. Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29. Bloch, P. H. (2011). Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 378-380. Calvosa, P. (2020). Entry, Exit and Innovation over the Industry Life Cycle in Converging Sectors: An Analysis of the Smartphone Industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(12), 151-168. Carr, E. W., Huber, D. E., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2017). The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 787. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Battaglia, R. D. (2015). Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design? Telecommunications Policy, 39(3-4), 162-175. Counterpoint Research. (2023a). Smartphone revenues worldwide from 2011 to 2022 (in billion U.S. dollars) [Graph]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/687476/global-smartphone-revenues/ Counterpoint Research. (2023b). Smartphone unit shipments worldwide from 2011 to 2022 (in millions) [Graph]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/687475/global-smartphone-shipments/ Creusen, M. E., & Schoormans, J. P. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81. Datta, H., Ailawadi, K. L., & Van Heerde, H. J. (2017). How well does consumer-based brand equity align with sales-based brand equity and marketing-mix response? Journal of Marketing, 81(3), 1-20. Desmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International journal of design, 1(1), 57-66. Giachetti, C., & Dagnino, G. B. (2014). Detecting the relationship between competitive intensity and firm product line length: Evidence from the worldwide mobile phone industry. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1398-1409. GSMA. (2023). The Mobile Economy 2023. https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/ Halberstadt, J. (2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and social psychology review, 10(2), 166-183. Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 149-156. Heath, T. B., DelVecchio, D., & McCarthy, M. S. (2011). The asymmetric effects of extending brands to lower and higher quality. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 3-20. Heitmann, M., Landwehr, J. R., Schreiner, T. F., & van Heerde, H. J. (2020). Leveraging brand equity for effective visual product design. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 257-277. Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 41-56. IDC. (2023). Global smartphone market share from 4th quarter 2009 to 1st quarter 2023(by vendor). https://www.statista.com/statistics/271496/global-market-share-held-by-smartphone-vendors-since-4th-quarter-2009/ Interbrand. (2022). Best Global Brands 2022. https://interbrand.com/best-global-brands/ Jeon, W., Kim, J., Lee, Y., & Won, D. (2011). A practical analysis of smartphone security. Symposium on Human Interface, Jia, J. S., Shiv, B., & Rao, S. (2014). The product-agnosia effect: How more visual impressions affect product distinctiveness in comparative choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 342-360. Jindal, R. P., Sarangee, K. R., Echambadi, R., & Lee, S. (2016). Designed to succeed: Dimensions of product design and their impact on market share. Journal of Marketing, 80(4), 72-89. John, D. R., Loken, B., & Joiner, C. (1998). The negative impact of extensions: can flagship products be diluted? Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 19-32. Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands. KIM, Y. E., & YANG, H. C. (2020). The effects of perceived satisfaction level of high-involvement product choice attribute of millennial generation on repurchase intention: Moderating effect of gender difference. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 131-140. Landwehr, J. R., Labroo, A. A., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Science, 30(3), 416-429. Landwehr, J. R., Wentzel, D., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 92-107. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British journal of psychology, 95(4), 489-508. Liu, Y., Li, K. J., Chen, H., & Balachander, S. (2017). The effects of products’ aesthetic design on demand and marketing-mix effectiveness: The role of segment prototypicality and brand consistency. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 83-102. Loken, B., & Ward, J. (1987). Measures of the attribute structure underlying product typicality. ACR North American Advances. McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71-84. Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54. Peng, Y.-S., & Liang, I.-C. (2016). A dynamic framework for competitor identification: A neglecting role of dominant design. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1898-1903. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 78. Rakib, M. R. H. K., Pramanik, S. A. K., Al Amran, M., Islam, M. N., & Sarker, M. O. F. (2022). Factors affecting young customers’ smartphone purchase intention during Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(9). Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and social psychology review, 8(4), 364-382. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8(3), 382-439. Smith, R. (2018). IBM created the world’s first smartphone 25 years ago. World Economic Forum, StatCounter. (2023). Mobile Vendor Market Share Worldwide June 2022 - June 2023. https://gs.statcounter.com/vendor-market-share/mobile/worldwide Strategy Analytics. (2023). Apple Hits Best Fourth Quarter Global Smartphone Market Share Ever in Q4 2022. Strategy Analytics; Business Wire. https://www.strategyanalytics.com/strategy-analytics/blogs/devices/smartphones/smart-phones/2023/02/03/apple-hits-best-fourth-quarter-global-smartphone-market-share-ever-in-q4-2022 Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46. Wike, R., Silver, L., Fetterolf, J., Huang, C., Austin, S., Clancy, L., & Gubbala, S. (2022). Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, But US is a Major Outlier. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/12/06/social-media-seen-as-mostly-good-for-democracy-across-many-nations-but-u-s-is-a-major-outlier/ Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1. 隋昱嬋. (2022). 【圖解】宏達電全力進軍元宇宙，有機會反攻嗎？一張圖看昔日霸主16年興衰. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/70056/htc-vive-metaverse | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89842 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 設計之於產品無疑已經成為競爭優勢的來源之一，除了功能性設計帶進的差異，產品的外觀設計的美學也對其市場表現有顯著的影響。研究亦指出品牌權益對外觀設計於產品市場表現的影響具有調節作用。而智慧型手機不論是品牌或是本身的外觀設計對消費者而言都是購買決策中的重要影響因素，然而針對智慧型外觀設計的研究數量卻為少數。
本研究首先會透過文獻回顧，了解產品設計與產品市場表現的關係，以及品牌權益在其中的影響力。接著會以智慧型手機品牌實際上市的產品做為資料來源，驗證品牌權益對產品設計與產品市場表現關係的影響是否可在智慧型手機的市場中得到印證。最後則探討智慧型手機市場中，高品牌權益的品牌與較低品牌權益的品牌在產品外觀美學設計上的策略差異。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Design has undoubtedly become one of the sources of competitive advantage for products. In addition to the differentiation brought by functional design, the aesthetic aspect of product design also has a significant impact on its market performance. Furthermore, research has pointed out that brand equity has a moderating effect on the impact of aesthetic design on product market performance. Smartphones, with brand and aesthetic design both being important influencing factors in consumers' purchase decisions, have rather limited research specifically focused on the aesthetic design aspect.
This study will first conduct a literature review to understand the relationship between product aesthetic design and market performance, as well as the influence of brand equity in this context. Subsequently, smartphone brands and their flagship products in the market will be used as the data source to verify whether the influence of brand equity on product design and market performance can be confirmed in the smartphone market. Finally, the study will explore the differences in the aesthetic design strategies of smartphone products between brands with high brand equity and those with lower brand equity in the smartphone market. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:21:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:21:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 產品設計定義 3 第二節 產品美學設計中的典型性 4 第三節 品牌權益 5 第四節 產品美學設計、品牌權益與市場表現 9 第三章 智慧型手機市場概況 12 第一節 市場概況 12 第二節 主要競爭者 14 第四章 智慧型手機外觀設計比較 17 第一節 資料來源與方法 17 第二節 比較結果 18 一、 2007 至 2013 年 18 二、 2014 至 2018 年 22 三、 2019 至 2022 年 29 第三節 小結 37 第五章 研究結論與建議 38 第一節 研究結論 38 第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 40 一、 研究貢獻 40 二、 管理意涵 40 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 41 參考文獻 42 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 智慧型手機設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 品牌權益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 外觀設計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 設計典型性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 模仿 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Aesthetic Design | en |
| dc.subject | Brand Equity | en |
| dc.subject | Design Typicality | en |
| dc.subject | Smartphone Design | en |
| dc.subject | Mimicry | en |
| dc.title | 品牌權益對產品外觀設計策略之影響 — 以智慧型手機為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of the Influence of Brand Equity on Product Aesthetic Design Strategy: Case Study of Smartphones | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳聿宏;陳俊廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Hung Chen;Chun-Ting Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 智慧型手機設計,外觀設計,品牌權益,設計典型性,模仿, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Smartphone Design,Aesthetic Design,Brand Equity,Design Typicality,Mimicry, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 47 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304003 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。