請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89798
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 孫家棟 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chia-Tung Shun | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃思綺 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ssu-Chi Huang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:09:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-20 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | [1]交通部・交通部統計查詢・機動車輛登記數・2023;https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301
[2] 交通部・交通部統計查詢・領有駕駛執照人數・2023;https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=a3301 [3] 衛生福利部統計處・歷年統計・109年死因統計結果分析 ;https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-5069-113-xCat-y109.html [4] 政府資料開放平臺・歷史交通事故資料・105年度A1類交通事故資料;https://data.gov.tw/dataset/12197 [5] 政府資料開放平臺・歷史交通事故資料・109年度A1類交通事故資料;https://data.gov.tw/dataset/12197 [6] 內政部・內政部戶政司・人口公開資料;https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=2&s=11663 [7] 交通部・交通部統計查詢・領有駕駛執照人數-按年齡及性別分 2023;https://stat.thb.gov.tw/hb01/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=21100 [8] 道路交通安全規則・第六十條 [9] 衛生福利部・交通意外傷害之流行病學研究・丁先玲・1992年 第八卷;第十期 https://www.cdc.gov.tw/EpidemicTheme/Detail/zKNFqsVWxUoUqE6fyhmBNA?archiveId=51htY59UokpP9ev5U93iLg [10] 歷年酒駕肇事受傷及死亡件數、人數統計表;https://data.gov.tw/dataset/9018 [11] 行政院主計總處・綜合統計處・110年3月18日;https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/1318163516IGBK10HN.pdf [12] 美國高速公路交通安全管理局・National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/seat-belts [13] 交通部高速公路局・109年11月27日;https://www.freeway.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=193&p=20531 [14] 美國精神醫學會精神疾病診斷統計手冊・DSM-IV -TR [15] Francisco Alonso., Juan C Pastor., Luis Montoro., Cristina Esteban., Driving under the influence of alcohol: frequency, reasons, perceived risk and punishment. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2015. [16] Sehun Oh., Michael G. Vaughn., Christopher P. Salas-Wright., Millan A. AbiNader., Mariana Sanchez., Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol: Findings from the NSDUH, 2002-2017.Addictive Behaviors, 2020. [17] Penning Renske., Veldstra Janet L., Daamen Anne P., Olivier Berend., Verster Joris C., Drugs of Abuse, Driving and Traffic Safety. Bentham Science, 2010. [18] Cameron S Crandall., Lenora M Olson., David P Sklar., Mortality Reduction with Air Bag and Seat Belt Use in Head-on Passenger Car Collisions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001;153(3):219-224. [19] Ji-Min Kim., Sang-Chul Kim., Kang-Hyun Lee., Ho-Jung Kim., Hoon Kim., Seok-Woo Lee., Dae-Seok Na., Jung-Soo Park., Preventive effects of seat belts on traumatic brain injury in motor vehicle collisions classified by crash severities and collision directions. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2019;47(5):1437-1449. [20] Martin Rubiev, Elitsa Deliverska., A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF FACIAL FRACTURE ETIOLOGIES. Journal of IMAB, 2012;18(2):153-154 [21] Raj D. Rao., Chirag A. Berry., Narayan Yoganandan., Arnav Agarwa., Occupant and crash characteristics in thoracic and lumbar spine injuries resulting from motor vehicle collisions. The Spine Journal, 2014;14(10):2355-65. [22] 台灣區交通事故損傷法醫資料庫與法醫相驗解剖傷勢量化評估研究 ( 1 /4 ) –建構交通事故案件通報系統及資料庫暨交通事故損傷與濫用藥物之相關性研究・蕭開平、鍾如惠、陳曉婷、顏小芳・法務部法醫研究所 [23] Mahdi Mohammadzadeh., Mohammad Paravar., Azadeh Sadat Mirzadeh., Javad Mohammadzadeh., Soroush Mahdian., Seat Belt Usage in Injured Car Occupants: Injury Patterns, Severity and Outcome After Two Main Car Accident Mechanisms in Kashan, Iran. Arch Trauma Res, 2015;4(1): e22203. [24] A A Mohamed., A Banerjee., Patterns of injury associated with automobile air bag use. The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1998;74(874):455-458 [25] Gian Luca Marella., Matteo Solinas., Saverio Potenza., Filippo Milano., Stefano Manciocchi., Emilio Perfetti., Francesco Raschellà., Mauro Liciani., Bartolo Caggiano., Silvestro Mauriello., IDENTIFICATION OF DRIVER AND FRONT PASSENGER IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS THROUGH SKELETAL INJURY PATTERN. EUROMEDITERRANEAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018;13(1):1-4 [26] 法醫師法.中華民國九十四年十二月二十八日總統華總一義字第09400212571號令制定公布全文 53 條 [27] 台灣現住人口數按性別及年齡分佈;https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_Query.aspx?sn=Jvwu1Ndiotx2AzKr6MD1kg%40%40&statsn=EcfUJy%24sRRPbnOe4TvO%24Jg%40%40&d=&n=129483 [28] 台灣地區領有駕駛執照人數統計.2020;https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/GECDB/Stat_Statistics_Query.aspx?sn=KRTBBErXDuLQxzY9EpLj6g%40%40&statsn=LYPoJD9Q6x85ktHnvtM9HA%40%40&d=&n=260120 [29] 勞動部統計資料庫.2017-2020;https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/statistic_DB.aspx [30] 內政部警政署統計資料・2018 警政交通大數據-串聯與應用 [31] 臺北市 109 年交通事故分析報告・2020 [32] 警政統計通報111年第26週 [33] 內政部警政署道路交通事故死亡人數與國際比較分析・2015 [34] 內政部警政署2012-2016道路交通事故資料・2022 [35] James Reason et al., Ames reason, Antony manstead, Stephen stradling, James baxter, Karen campbell., Errors and violations on the road:a real distinction, Ergonomics, pp.1315-1332,1990. [36] Per-Arne Rimmö, Lars Åberg, On the distinction between violations and errors: sensation seeking associations, Transportation Research Part F, pp.151-166,1999. [37] Vipul N Ambade, Sirsat Kunal B and Sharma Manu., Pattern of injuries in different types of victims of road traffic accident in central India: A comparative study. Journal of forensic science and research, 2021 [38] Jennifer Koay, Donald D. Davis, Jeffery P. Hogg., Chance Fractures. National library of medicine, 2022. [39] Mant AK. Injuries and deaths ni road traffic accidents. The Pathology of Trauma, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold, ch. .1, 1993. [40] DiMaio J, Deaths caused by motor vehicle accidents. In: Forensic Pathology, 2nd edn. (279-318). Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2001. [41] Zoltan G. Turi., Cardiac Tamponade. Critical Care Medicine (Third Edition), 2008. [42] 台北慈濟醫院報導專欄・2022 [43] Farrukh Javeed, Lal Rehman, Ali Afzal, Asad Abbas., Outcome of diffuse axonal injury in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. 2021 Aug 3. doi: 10.25259/SNI_573_2020 [44] 衛生福利部・109 年死因統計結果分析・2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89798 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 交通事故為國人十大死因事故傷害之重要原因之一,更是法醫相驗及解剖鑑定上常遇見的死亡型態。在司法上,鑑別汽車駕駛或是乘客,對於責任歸屬具舉足輕重的角色。近年來人 口結構老化,帶病駕駛更是值得關注的領域。本研究收錄 2016 - 2020 年間台灣地區汽車事故致死且經解剖鑑定個案之完整資料,總計 146 例。再針對其人口學特性、危險因子、事故型態、損傷型態及死亡方式與原因進行分析,所有案例中男性居多,男女性別比為 5.95:1,年齡分佈自 8 個月大嬰兒至 94 歲老翁,平均年齡為 50.65±15.19 歲。所有案例中共計 110 位駕駛者,29 位乘客,其中 7 位座位無法歸類。無照駕駛比例為 6.4%,無照駕駛者均已達報考駕照之年齡,(包含未曾考照、吊銷與吊扣)。146 例中有 14 例未使用安全帶,且 2 例小於 12 歲之孩童均未使用安全座椅。在事故樣態分類中,自撞案件佔 45.5%,非自撞則為 40.9%。 最常發生事故之道路種類以市區道路的 37%最多,道路型態以直路的 53.3%最多。在所有收錄個案中,以牽涉車輛數只有 1 輛者佔所有案例的 51.0%為最多,僅包含 1 輛車之自撞事故佔所有所自撞事故的 85%,其餘為 2 兩輛以上(死者駕駛或乘坐之汽車撞擊其他靜止車輛或自撞靜止物後遭其他車輛撞擊)。不論駕駛或是副駕駛座乘客都是以胸部損傷最多,是最常見的損傷型態,後座乘客則以頭臉部損傷的 29.6% 最多,駕駛座的胸部損與撞擊方向盤相關,後座乘客的頭臉部損傷則與撞擊前方座位有關。有無使用安全帶之個案受傷型態均以胸部損傷最多,但未使用安全帶者有較高比率被拋飛車外,有使用安全帶者則有較高的脊柱損傷以及肢體骨折。所有個案中,有 74%的死亡個案於事故時至少具有一種疾病,以心、腦血管相關疾病最多,而帶病駕駛佔所有駕駛的 78.2%,且帶病駕駛自撞的比率顯著高於健康駕駛。顯示疾病有無對於影響駕駛能力或是受傷後康復能力佔有重要角色,當欲判定駕駛死亡方式時,需同時考慮死亡個案之傷勢嚴重程度、解剖鑑定發現、過往病史以及檢警外部調查資料方能判斷,自然死個案往往有傷勢較輕、解剖鑑定發現與過去病史相符等特徵,對於肇事責任歸屬、保險賠償上具有決定性關鍵。經由本研究,期待可以協助對於民、刑事之司法審判上對汽車事故發生事實的判定,提供釐清肇事責任以及真相的依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Traffic accidents are one of the leading causes of death and injury among the population, and they are commonly encountered in forensic examination and autopsy. In the field of justice, determining the responsibility of the car driver or passenger plays a crucial role. In recent years, with increasing aging population, driving with medical conditions has become an area of concern. This study includes comprehensive data from autopsy cases of fatal car accidents in Taiwan from 2016 to 2020, totaling 146 cases. The study analyzes the demographic characteristics, risk factors, accident patterns, types of injuries, and causes of death and their correlation. Among all the cases, males accounted for the majority, with a male-to-female ratio of 5.95:1. The age distribution ranged from 8-month-old infants to 94-year-old elderly, with an average age of 50.65±15.19 years. There were a total of 110 drivers and 29 passengers, with 7 cases where the seating position could not be classified. The proportion of unlicensed drivers was 6.4%, and all unlicensed drivers had reached the legal age for obtaining a driver's license (including those who had never applied, had their licenses suspended, or had their licenses revoked). Among the 146 cases, 14 cases involved individuals not wearing seat belts, and 2 cases involved children under the age of 12 who were not using child safety seats. In terms of accident patterns, self-collision cases accounted for 45.5%, while non-self-collision cases accounted for 40.9%. The most common type of road involved in accidents was urban roads, accounting for 37% of the cases, and the most common road configuration was straight roads, accounting for 53.3%. Single-vehicle accidents accounted for the highest percentage, with 51.0% of all cases involving only one vehicle. Both drivers and front-seat passengers had the highest incidence of chest injuries, which was the most common type of injury. Rear-seat passengers had the highest incidence of head and facial injuries, which were related to impacts with front seats. Cases involving individuals not wearing seat belts also had a high incidence of chest injuries, but they had a higher rate of being ejected from the vehicle. Cases involving individuals wearing seat belts had a higher incidence of spinal injuries and limb fractures. Among all the cases, 74% of the fatalities had at least one pre-existing medical condition at the time of the accident, with cardiovascular-related diseases being the most common. Drivers with medical conditions accounted for 78.2% of all drivers, and the rate of self-collision was significantly higher among drivers with medical conditions compared to healthy drivers. This indicates that the presence of medical conditions plays a significant role in affecting driving ability or post-injury recovery. When determining the cause of driver's death, the severity of injuries, findings from autopsy examinations, medical history, and external investigations conducted by the police and other agencies must be considered. Natural deaths often exhibit characteristics such as less severe injuries, consistent findings with the medical history, etc. These characteristics are crucial in determining liability in the accident and insurance compensation. Through this study, it is hoped that it can assist in the judicial determination of factual evidence in civil and criminal trials related to car accidents and provide a basis for clarifying the liability and truth behind the incidents. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:09:43Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:09:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………………..… i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………………..……………… ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………..…… iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………..…… iv 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 第一節 前言………………………………………………………………………………… 1 第二節 文獻回顧…………………………………………………………………………… 2 2.1 名詞定義…………………………………………………………………………… 2 2.1.1 汽車………………………………………………………………………..… 2 2.1.2 道路交通事故……………………………………………………………..… 4 2.2 名詞定義………………………………………………………………………..….. 4 2.2.1 臺灣之酒精、藥物使用相關法律規範…………………………………….. 5 2.2.2 台灣之汽車安全帶使用相關法律規範…………………………………….. 8 2.3 汽車事故損傷型態探討…………………………………………………...…......... 10 2.4 汽車事故中駕駛與其他乘客之間損傷型態差異………………………………… 12 第二章 材料與方法……………………………………………………………………………… 14 第一節 研究背景…………………………………………………………………………… 14 第二節 資料來源…………………………………………………………………………… 14 第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………………………… 14 3.1 個案篩選…………………………………………………………………………… 14 3.2 研究調查表設計…………………………………………………………………… 15 3.3 資料收集…………………………………………………………………………… 15 3.4 資料統計與分析…………………………………………………………………… 16 第三章 結果……………………………………………………………………………………… 17 第一節 總論………………………………………………………………………………. 17 1.1 汽車事故致死解剖案例統計……………………………………………………. 17 1.2 汽車事故致死解剖案例之人口學變因分析……………………………………. 17 1.3 駕駛或乘客、有無駕照、佩戴安全帶狀況及車種分析………………………. 18 1.4 汽車事故致死案例發生之季節、天候、時間及現場光線之分析……………. 19 1.5 汽車事故發生之道路類別及型態………………………………………………. 20 1.6 汽車事故致死案例中包含車輛數目及車種……………………………………. 21 1.7 汽車事故致死案例中酒精使用之分析………………………………………….. 21 1.8 汽車事故致死案例中毒藥物使用之分析……………………………………….. 22 1.9 死亡距解剖天數之分析………………………………………………………….. 22 第二節 損傷型態分析……………………………………………………………………. 23 2.1 於汽車事故中不同座位造成之損傷型態分佈…………………………………. 23 2.2 於不同汽車事故型態下死亡個案受傷型態之分析……………………………. 25 2.3 有無使用安全帶損傷型態分佈…………………………………………………. 27 2.4 帶病駕駛之損傷型態與事故型態分析…………………………………………. 28 第三節 死亡原因與死亡方式之分析……………………………………………………. 30 3.1 於汽車中不同座位死亡原因分析………………………………………………. 30 3.2 事故型態與死亡原因及方式之分析……………………………………………. 31 3.3 存活時間與死亡原因及死亡方式之分析………………………………………. 31 第四節 判定駕駛或乘客之分析…………………………………………………………. 33 第四章 討論……………………………………………………………………………………. 34 第一節 汽車事故死亡個案與其人口學特性……………………………………………. 34 第二節 汽車事故死亡個案與事故發生時之外部環境…………………………………. 35 第三節 損傷型態(Patterned Injury)…………………………………………………… 38 第四節 判定個案於事故中乘坐的位置…………………………………………………. 41 第五節 死亡的原因與方式………………………………………………………………. 42 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 臺灣地區汽車道路交通事故致死解剖及相驗案例分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis of Fatal Car Incidents from Forensic Autopsy in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 翁德怡 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Te-I Weng | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許倬憲;許敏能 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Cho-Hsien Hsu;Min-Neng Hsu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 臺灣地區,汽車事故,司法解剖鑑定,帶病駕駛, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan,Car Incidence,Forensic Autopsy,Driving Under Illness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 88 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301240 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-20 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 法醫學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 法醫學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.14 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。