Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 健康政策與管理研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89646
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭年真zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorNien-Chen Kuoen
dc.contributor.author林恩羽zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYan Yu Andy Lamen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T16:13:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-13-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-06-08-
dc.identifier.citationCampanella, P., Vukovic, V., Parente, P., Sulejmani, A., Ricciardi, W., & Specchia, M. L. (2016). The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res, 16, 296.
Castle, N. G. (2009). The Nursing Home Compare report card: consumers' use and understanding. J Aging Soc Policy, 21(2), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420902733272
Castle, N. G., Engberg, J., & Liu, D. (2007). Have Nursing Home Compare quality measure scores changed over time in response to competition? Qual Saf Health Care, 16(3), 185-191.
Cornell, P. Y., Grabowski, D. C., Norton, E. C., & Rahman, M. (2019). Do report cards predict future quality? The case of skilled nursing facilities. J Health Econ, 66, 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.05.008
Jeon, Y. H., Casey, A. N., Vo, K., Rogers, K., Poole, B., & Fethney, J. (2019). Associations between clinical indicators of quality and aged-care residents' needs and consumer and staff satisfaction: the first Australian study. Aust Health Rev, 43(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17213
Johari, K., Kellogg, C., Vazquez, K., Irvine, K., Rahman, A., & Enguidanos, S. (2018). Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings. BMJ Quality and Safety, 27(8), 619. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/27/8/619.abstract
Konetzka, R. T., Davila, H., Brauner, D. J., Cursio, J. F., Sharma, H., Werner, R. M., Park, Y. S., & Shippee, T. P. (2021). The Quality Measures Domain in Nursing Home Compare: Is High Performance Meaningful or Misleading? Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab054
Kumpunen, S., Trigg, L. and Holder, J. (2019). Helping older people to use quality information to choose residential care. Journal of Long-Term Care, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.qj1phzdns3dg
Lee, H. Y., & Shin, J. H. (2019). Public Reporting on the Quality Ratings of Nursing Homes in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs, 49(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.2.161
Li, Y., Cai, X., & Wang, M. (2019). Social media ratings of nursing homes associated with experience of care and “Nursing Home Compare” quality measures. 19(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4100-7
Li, Y., Lu, L., & Lu, S. (2020). Do Social Media Trump Government Report Cards in Influencing Consumer Choice? Evidence from U.S. Nursing Homes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3462210
Liu, D., & Lu, C. J. (2015). Visibility and findability of the nursing home compare website. Soc Work Public Health, 30(2), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2014.969861
Mashouri, P., Taati, B., Quirt, H., & Iaboni, A. (2020). Quality Indicators as Predictors of Future Inspection Performance in Ontario Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 21(6), 793-798 e791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.007
Mukamel, D. B., Amin, A., Weimer, D. L., Sharit, J., Ladd, H., & Sorkin, D. H. (2016). When Patients Customize Nursing Home Ratings, Choices And Rankings Differ From The Government's Version. Health Aff (Millwood), 35(4), 714-719. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1340
Mukamel, D. B., Saliba, D., Weimer, D. L., & Ladd, H. (2021). Families' and Residents' Perspectives of the Quality of Nursing Home Care: Implications for Composite Quality Measures. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 22(8), 1609-1614 e1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.004
Perraillon, M. C., Brauner, D. J., & Konetzka, R. T. (2019). Nursing Home Response to Nursing Home Compare: The Provider Perspective. Med Care Res Rev, 76(4), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558717725165
Poldrugovac, M., Amuah, J. E., Wei-Randall, H., Sidhom, P., Morris, K., Allin, S., Klazinga, N., & Kringos, D. (2022). Public Reporting of Performance Indicators in Long-Term Care in Canada: Does it Make a Difference? Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 41(4), 565-576. https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/public-reporting-of-performance-indicators-in-longterm-care-in-canada-does-it-make-a-difference/8465B3D1BD130DEF505B7432D2EEBB3C
Rodrigues, R., Trigg, L., Schmidt, A. E., & Leichsenring, K. (2014). The public gets what the public wants: experiences of public reporting in long-term care in Europe. Health Policy, 116(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.012
Schapira, M. M., Shea, J. A., Duey, K. A., Kleiman, C., & Werner, R. M. (2016). The Nursing Home Compare Report Card: Perceptions of Residents and Caregivers Regarding Quality Ratings and Nursing Home Choice. Health Serv Res, 51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), 1212-1228.
Trigg, L., Kumpunen, S., Holder, J., Maarse, H., SolÉ JuvÉS, M., & Gil, J. (2018). Information and choice of residential care provider for older people: a comparative study in England, the Netherlands and Spain. Ageing & Society, 38(6), 1121-1147. https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/information-and-choice-of-residential-care-provider-for-older-people-a-comparative-study-in-england-the-netherlands-and-spain/B39CA9F64025753D495A7F6CE06C6B3E
Zheng, Q., Williams, C. S., Shulman, E. T., & White, A. J. (2022). Association between staff turnover and nursing home quality - evidence from payroll-based journal data. J Am Geriatr Soc, 70(9), 2508-2516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17843
中央健康保險署. (2023). 醫療品質資訊公開網站. Retrieved April 1 from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/AmountInfoWeb/index.html
老人長期照護機構設立標準及許可辦法, (2007). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050044
長期照顧服務機構評鑑辦法, (2017). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070042
老人福利機構設立標準, (2022a). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=d0050039
護理機構設置標準, (2022b). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020035
護理機構評鑑辦法, (2022c). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020184
美國聯邦醫療保險和補助服務中心. (2022). Design for Care Compare Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users’ Guide. Retrieved May 1 from https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/certificationandcomplianc/downloads/usersguide.pdf
美國聯邦醫療保險和補助服務中心. (2023). Care Compare. Retrieved April 1 from https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/
英國照護品質委員會. (2022). Find Care Home. Retrieved April 1 from https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/find-care-home
財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. (2020). 台灣臨床成效指標 (TCPI). Retrieved April 1 from https://tcpi.jct.org.tw/App_Themes/Default/pdf/%E9%95%B7%E6%9C%9F%E7%85%A7%E8%AD%B7%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99%E6%B8%85%E5%96%AE(2019%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%88%E8%B5%B7%E9%81%A9%E7%94%A8).pdf
國家發展委員會. (2022). 人口推估統計資料. Retrieved May 1 from https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/
衛生福利部. (2022a). 全國老人福利機構概況統計. Retrieved April 1 from https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/VDetail.aspx?nodeid=358&pid=460
衛生福利部. (2022b). 護理之家評鑑結果查詢系統. Retrieved April 1 from https://ltca.mohw.gov.tw/opn
衛生福利部社會及家庭署. (2022). 長照機構、養護機構、安養機構評鑑成績查詢結果. Retrieved April 1 from https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/VDetail.aspx?nodeid=464&pid=2991
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89646-
dc.description.abstract研究背景:臺灣將於2025年進入超高齡社會,人口結構的改變使臺灣的高齡產業與長期照護的需求日益上升,提供住宿長照服務的單位及床數也逐漸增加,一般民眾在為家中需要長期照護的家屬選擇住宿式長照機構時,需要具有更多的客觀資訊作為考量的依據,在歐美國家長照品質資訊公開網站已運行多年。
研究目的:本研究參考國外文獻及現行公開資訊網站做法,依據目前臺灣市面上商用長照資訊系統次級資料,擷取可取得之結構面、過程面及結果面品質數據;篩選適合公開之品質指標,反映不同長照機構之照顧品質,提供民眾選擇長照服務單位時的依據;建構可供民眾瀏覽之長照機構照顧品質資訊公開網站。
研究方法:本研究透過研究及收集臺灣護理之家及老人福利機構於2021年間使用臺灣某長照資訊系統所登載記錄之資料,經由統計分析、參考國外文獻、公開資訊網站及美國CMS所使用的五星評等機制及計算評等,規畫住宿式長照機構品質資訊公開網站雛型。
研究結果:透過收集全臺灣30家護理之家及70家老人福利機構,總共68,132人次之資料,經由統計分析及計算評等後,給予人力資源及照護品質兩大類別之個別評等,再將其加以計算得出綜合評等,並將所有指標項目及說明進行整理,完成製作一個臺灣住宿式長照機構品質資訊公開網站雛型。
結論:本研究提出的公開資訊網站雛型,包含了基本資訊、圖形化的評等及呈現數據機制、詳細說明各項指標的表現及其重要性,期望能夠達到與國外同類型網站一致的目的:除了讓民眾能夠快速了解機構,也能促進機構經營者更進一步了解自身經營的策略與其他機構間的差異,向表現更好的機構標竿學習,使機構照護品質進入正面循環,提供住民的生活品質,創造更好的長照環境。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: Taiwan will enter a super-aged society in 2025. Changes in the demographic structure have increased the demand for elderly industries and long-term care in Taiwan. The number of long-term care facilities has also gradually increased. When family members choose long-term care facilities, they need to have more objective information as a basis for consideration. The long-term care quality information disclosure website in European and American countries has been running for many years.
Objective: This study refers to literature and the current practice of open-data websites, and based on a current commercialized long-term care information system data on the market in Taiwan, to extract the available structural, process, and outcome quality measures; The quality of long-term care facilities provides the basis for the public to choose long-term care facilities; builds a public website for long-term care facilities care quality information that can be browsed easily by the public in Taiwan.
Methods: This research collects data from nursing homes and long-term care facilities which are using a long-term care information system in Taiwan during 2021. With the processes of statistical analysis, literature reviews, utilizing the star rating methodology adopted by CMS in the United States. This research proposed a prototype of the quality information disclosure website of long-term care facilities.
Results: By collecting data from 30 nursing homes and 70 long-term care facilities in Taiwan, total of 68,132 person, after statistical analysis and calculation of ratings, ratings in two categories of human resources and quality of care are given and then calculated. A comprehensive rating was obtained, and all quality measures and descriptions were sorted out to establish the prototype of a quality information disclosure website for Taiwanese long-term care facilities.
Conclusions: The prototype of the quality information disclosure website proposed in this study includes basic information, a graphical 5-star rating and data presentation module, and a detailed description of both performance and importance of various quality measures. It is expected to achieve the same purpose as the Care Compare websites provided by CMS: in addition to allowing the public to quickly understand the facilities, it can promote the facilities to have a better understanding the differences of strategies between their own and other facilities, and benchmark learning from the better performing facilities, so that the long-term care facilities can provide residents with a better life quality and create a better long-term care environment.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-13T16:13:30Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-13T16:13:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌 謝 I
摘 要 II
ABSTRACT III
目 錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 10
第貳章 文獻回顧 11
第一節 臺灣長期照顧住宿式機構體系 11
第二節 現有長照機構評鑑制度 11
第三節 品質指標項目 12
第四節 國內長期照護品質指標 14
第五節 美國聯邦醫療保險和補助服務中心五星等級評分系統 16
第六節 國外長期照顧住宿式機構品質公開資訊 19
第參章 研究設計與方法 25
第一節 研究設計與架構 25
第二節 研究對象 25
第三節 資料來源與處理流程 26
第四節 研究變項與操作型定義 28
第五節 公開資訊網站雛型實作 28
第六節 統計分析方法 29
第肆章 研究結果 43
第一節 公開資訊網站雛型 43
第二節 機構基本資料之描述性統計 54
第三節 各項資料檔之描述性統計 57
第四節 各縣市護理之家及老人福利機構於各項品質指標統計分析 61
第五節 雙變項分析 - 皮爾森相關係數及線性迴歸分析 106
第六節 多變項線性迴歸分析及羅吉斯迴歸分析 109
第七節 長期照顧住宿式機構評等結果 112
第伍章 討論 114
第一節 品質指標計算所需資訊的取得 114
第二節 品質指標的篩選 115
第三節 長照機構照護品質資訊公開 115
第四節 研究限制 117
第陸章 結論與建議 119
第一節 結論 119
第二節 建議 120
參考文獻 122
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject品質指標zh_TW
dc.subject長期照顧zh_TW
dc.subject資訊公開zh_TW
dc.subjectLong-term Careen
dc.subjectQuality Measuresen
dc.subjectPublic Reporten
dc.title臺灣長期照顧住宿式機構品質資訊公開之先驅研究zh_TW
dc.titleExploring the Public Reporting of Quality in Long-Term Care Facilities: a Pilot Studyen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳雅美;吳希文zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYa-Mei Chen;Hsi-Wen Wuen
dc.subject.keyword長期照顧,品質指標,資訊公開,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordLong-term Care,Quality Measures,Public Report,en
dc.relation.page127-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202300948-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-06-08-
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept健康政策與管理研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2028-06-07-
顯示於系所單位:健康政策與管理研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.64 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved