請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89355完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曹峰銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Feng-Ming Tsao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃怡亭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-07T16:39:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陸莉、劉鴻香（1994）：《修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗》。心理出版社。[Lu, L. & Liu, H. S. (Eds.). (1994). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd.]
陳美彤（2014年1月20日）：〈性侵害刑事審判中之兒童證人〉。國立台灣大學中國信託慈善基金會兒少暨家庭研究中心。https://cfrc.ntu.edu.tw/upload/action_file2/sn4a2fqu20140627152614.pdf [Chen, M. T., (2014) Child witnesses in criminal sexual assault trials. National Taiwan University Children and Family Research Center. https://cfrc.ntu.edu.tw/upload/action_file2/sn4a2fqu20140627152614.pdf] 曹峰銘、蔡佩君、王加恩、呂信慧（2012）：〈高功能自閉症學齡兒童的心智理論 與口語敘說〉。《中華心理學刊》, 54(3), 365-383。[Feng, M. T., Pei C. T., Jia, E. W., & Hsin, H. L. (2012) Theory of Mind and narrative abilities in school-aged children with high-functioning autism. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.06] 最高法院63年度台上字第3501號判決 Aksu-Koç, A., & Erciyes, A. A. (2018). Narrative discourse: Developmental perspectives. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communicative disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied-linguistic perspectives (pp. 329–356). Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77(6), 1698–1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x Austen, J., & Johnson, C. L. (1998). Mansfield Park. Norton. Aydin, C., & Ceci, S. J. (2013). The role of culture and language in avoiding misinformation: Pilot findings. Behavioral Sciences &the Law, 31(5), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2077 Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359 Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422 Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2000). Development of working memory: Should the pascual-leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2592 Barendse, E. M., Hendriks, M. P., Jansen, J. F., Backes, W. H., Hofman, P. A., Thoonen, G., Kessels, R. P., & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2013). Working memory deficits in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-5-14 Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of Mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407– 418. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1023/A:1023035012436 Bauer, P. J., Larkina, M., & Deocampo, J. (2011). Early memory development. In U.Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00192 Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2019). Fuzzy-trace theory, false memory, and the law. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218797143 Bright-Paul, A., Jarrold, C., & Wright, D. B. (2008). Theory-of-mind development influences suggestibility and source monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1055 Brown, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). Can children be useful witnesses? It depends how. they are questioned. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12142 Brown, D. A., Brown, E.-J., Lewis, C. N., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). Narrative skill and testimonial accuracy in typically developing children and those with intellectual disabilities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3427 Bruck, M., Hembrooke, H., Ceci, S., & Yehuda, R. (1997a). Children’s reports of pleasant and unpleasant events. Recollections of Trauma, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2672-5_8 Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children's memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419 Bruck, M., & Melnyk, L. (2004). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: A review and synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(8), 947–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1070 Caprin, C., Benedan, L., Ciaccia, D., Mazza, E., Messineo, S., & Piuri, E. (2016). True and false memories in middle childhood: The relationship with cognitive functioning. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(5), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2016.1168420 Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72(4), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00333 Cassel, W. S., Roebers, C. E. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1996). Developmental patterns of eyewitness responses to repeated and increasingly suggestive questions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0008 Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403 Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children’s Testimony. https://doi.org/10.1037/10180-000 Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of Children’s Memory: Psycholegal Implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.38 Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1965). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Endres, J. (1997). The suggestibility of the child witness: The role of individual differences and their assessment. The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 1, 44–67. Retrieved from Feld, B. C. (2012). Real interrogation: What actually happens when cops question kids. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e669802012-348 Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., ... & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the society for research in child development, i-185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1166093 Fivush, R. (1991). The social construction of personal narratives. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 59-81. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23087339 Fivush, R., Haden, C., & Adam, S. (1995). Structure and coherence of preschoolers′ personal narratives over time: Implications for childhood amnesia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1030 Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the mcmartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.347 Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between Cognition and Action: Performance of children 312–7 years old on a stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-x Goodman, G. S., Qin, J., Bottoms, B. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Characteristics and. sources of allegations of ritualistic child abuse. University of California. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2 Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). A parallel form of the gudjonsson suggestibility scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1987.tb01348.x Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02172093 Heather Fritzley, V., & Lee, K. (2003). Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74(5), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00608 Hendrickson, V., & Shapiro, L. R. (2001). Cohesive reference devices in children’s. personal narratives. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 17-22. Retrieved from Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00921.x Jaschinski, U., & Wentura, D. (2002). Misleading postevent information and working memory capacity: An individual differences approach to eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.783 Karpinski, A. C., & Scullin, M. H. (2009). Suggestibility under pressure: Theory of mind, executive function, and suggestibility in preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.004 Klemfuss, J. Z. (2014). Differential contributions of language skills to children’s episodic recall. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(4), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2014.952415 Klemfuss, J. Z., & Olaguez, A. P. (2018). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: An updated review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(2), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1508108 Kochanska, G., Murray, K., Jacques, T. Y., Koenig, A. L., & Vandegeest, K. A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Development, 67(2), 490-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01747.x Kulkofsky, S., & Klemfuss, J. Z. (2008). What the stories children tell can tell about their. memory: Narrative skill and young children's suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1442. https://doi org/10.1037/a0012849 Kulkofsky, S., Wang, Q., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Do better stories make better memories? Narrative quality and memory accuracy in preschool children. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1326 Lagattuta, K. H., Sayfan, L., & Monsour, M. (2011). A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: Children and adults find happy‐sad more difficult than day‐night. Developmental Science, 14(3), 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00994.x Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11-12), 1201-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021 Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.926. Lin, T. H. J. (2015). Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Syntax, 18(3), 320-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12032 Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory: Information introduced after we view an incident can transform memory. American Scientist, 67(3), 312-320. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27849223 Lorsbach, T. C., Katz, G. A., & Cupak, A. J. (1998). Developmental differences in the ability to inhibit the initial misinterpretation of garden path passages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71(3), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2462 Melinder, A., Endestad, T. O. R., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Relations between episodic memory, suggestibility, theory of mind, and cognitive inhibition in the preschool child. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00542.x Morgan, K., & Hayne, H. (2011). Age‐related changes in visual recognition memory. during. infancy and early childhood. Developmental Psychobiology, 53(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20503 Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111(2), 486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.486 Owen, A. M., Downes, J. J., Sahakian, B. J., Polkey, C. E., & Robbins, T. W. (1990). Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia, 28(10), 1021-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90137-D Pellicano, E. (2010). The development of core cognitive skills in autism: A 3‐year prospective study. Child Development, 81(5), 1400-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01481.x Perez, C. O., London, K., & Otgaar, H. (2022). A review of the differential contributions of language abilities to children’s eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Developmental Review, 63, 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.101009 Perner, J. (2000). Memory and theory of mind. In E. Tulving, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 297–312). New York: Oxford University Press. Peterson, C., & Grant, M. (2001). Forced-choice: Are forensic interviewers asking the right questions? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 118 –127. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087134 Plötner, M., Hepach, R., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2021). Young children. share more under time pressure than after a delay. PloS One, 16(3), e0248121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248121 Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2002). Children’s suggestibility in the forensic context. In M. L. Eisen, J. A. Quas, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 355–381). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Rajan, V., Cuevas, K., & Bell, M. A. (2014). The contribution of executive function to. source memory development in early childhood. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.763809 Reese, E., & Fivush, R. (1993). Parental styles of talking about the past. Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.3.596 Reese, E., Haden, C. A., Baker-Ward, L., Bauer, P., Fivush, R., & Ornstein, P. A. (2011). Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(4), 424-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.587854 Rocha, E. M., Marche, T. A., & Briere, J. L. (2013). The effect of forced-choice questions on children's suggestibility: A comparison of multiple-choice and yes/no questions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028507 Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2000). The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(6), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<509::AID-ACP668>3.0.CO;2-W Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2005). Individual differences in young children's. suggestibility: Relations to event memory, language abilities, working memory, and executive functioning. Cognitive Development, 20(3), 427-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.006 Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development. of. executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and US preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17(1), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01667.x Scullin, M. H., & Ceci, S. J. (2001). A suggestibility scale for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(5), 843-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00077-5 Simcock, G., & Hayne, H. (2003). Age-related changes in verbal and nonverbal memory. during early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 39(5), 805. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.5.805 Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413476512 Sussman, R. F., & Sekuler, R. (2022). Feeling rushed? Perceived time pressure impacts. executive function and stress. Acta Psychologica, 229, 103702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103702 Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. Credibility Assessment, 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_6 Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Don Read, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 597-603. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196318 Waters, T. E., Camia, C., Facompré, C. R., & Fivush, R. (2019). A meta-analytic examination of maternal reminiscing style: Elaboration, gender, and children’s cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin, 145(11), 1082–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000211 Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory‐of‐mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta‐analysis of theory‐of‐mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304 Westby, C., & Robinson, L. (2014b). A developmental perspective for promoting theory of mind. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/tld.0000000000000035 Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The dimensional change card sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1(1), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.46 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89355 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去研究指出兒童心智理論、執行功能與敘說能力，皆可能影響兒童之記憶暗示性，但缺乏兒童高階心智理論發展與記憶暗示性關聯探究。本研究的目的在於檢視從學前到學齡的記憶暗示發展趨勢，以及檢視這項趨勢有關的因素，例如，心智理論、執行功能和口語敘說能力。本研究的作業包含：記憶暗示性作業、心智理論（初階和高階心智理論作業）、執行功能中的衝動抑制與空間工作記憶，以及兒童敘說；並以32位4至5歲學前兒童（平均年齡 = 4.99歲）32位8至9歲學齡兒童（平均年齡 = 8.93歲）為研究對象，探究兒童記憶暗示性的發展趨勢，以及記憶暗示性與認知能力之間的關聯。研究發現有四：（一）學前兒童相對於學齡兒童，更容易受記憶暗示影響。(二)在記憶暗示類型上，學前兒童較容易被首次聽見的暗示性問題所影響；然而學齡兒童面對暗示性是非題之重複提問時，將正確答案改變為錯誤答案的比率比學前組高。（三）學前兒童的敘說能力，與回憶敘說內容中的正確資訊與錯誤資訊皆呈現正相關；而學齡兒童的敘說能力則與敘說內容中的正確資訊呈現正相關。（四）高階心智理論能力較佳之學前兒童面對記憶暗示問題時，較不受暗示線索所影響；而高階心智理論能力與敘說能力較佳之學齡兒童，較不受暗示線索所影響。研究結果呈現記憶受暗示的情況，隨年紀增加而降低。而且心智理論及敘說能力較佳的兒童，他們的回憶較不受暗示線索干擾。本研究除了展現記憶受暗示的發展趨勢及相關因素，也具有司法詢問兒童記憶的實務意涵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous studies have investigated the relationships between children’s memory suggestibility and cognitive skills. Yet, the potential linkage between children’s suggestibility and social cognitive ability: advanced Theory of Mind remained unexplored. Our study employed various assessments to scrutinize the relationships between advanced Theory of Mind, other cognitive abilities, and suggestibility. The assessments include suggestibility tasks, Theory of Mind tasks (including both first-order and advanced Theory of Mind tasks), executive function tasks (including both inhibition and spatial working memory evaluations), and narrative assessments. The subjects of our study consisted of 32 preschool children aged 4 and 5 years (Mage = 4.99) and 32 school-aged children aged 8 and 9 years (Mage = 8.93). Our results support four principal findings: (1) overall, preschool children exhibited higher levels of suggestibility compared to school-aged children; (2) preschool children were more suggestible when facing suggestive questions for the first time, whereas school-aged children were more inclined to alter their responses from correct to incorrect answers when confronted with repeated questioning; (3) School-aged children with better narrative abilities tend to include more accurate information in their narrative; (4) Advanced Theory of Mind ability was correlated with resistance to suggestion in preschool children. On the other hand, both advanced Theory of Mind and narrative ability were correlated with school-aged children’s resistance to suggestion. The research findings demonstrate a general trend in that memory suggestibility decreases with increasing age. Furthermore, children with higher levels of Theory of Mind and narrative abilities are less suggestible. This study reveals the developmental trends and cognitive factors related to memory suggestibility, which holds practical implications for forensic interviewing of children's memories. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-07T16:39:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-07T16:39:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 序論 …………………………………………………………………………………1 第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………………………………………3 第一節 兒童記憶可暗示性…………………………………………………………3 第二節 記憶可暗示性與語言發展之關聯…………………………………………6 第三節 記憶可暗示性與心智理論發展之關聯 …………………………………11 第四節 記憶可暗示性與執行功能發展之關聯 …………………………………16 第五節 研究設計與問題 …………………………………………………………19 第三章 方法…………………………………………………………………………………22 第一節 研究參與者 ………………………………………………………………22 第二節 研究工具 …………………………………………………………………23 第三節 步驟 ………………………………………………………………………33 第四節 統計分析 …………………………………………………………………35 第四章 結果…………………………………………………………………………………37 第一節 記憶受暗示和記憶回憶時間限制及年紀的關係 ………………………37 第二節 心智理論、執行功能與記憶可暗示性 …………………………………48 第三節 敘說與記憶可暗示性 ……………………………………………………54 第四節 心智理論、執行功能和敘說能力與記憶可暗示性 ……………………62 第五章 討論…………………………………………………………………………………69 第一節 研究發現與討論 …………………………………………………………69 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 ………………………………………………74 第六章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………………77 第七章 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………88 附錄一 暗示性作業：故事內容、圖片與暗示性問題 …………………………88 附錄二 敘說內容中「事件」與「心理狀態」評分清單 ……………………98 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 學前兒童 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 記憶暗示性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學齡兒童 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心智理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 記憶敘說 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | school-aged children | en |
| dc.subject | Suggestibility | en |
| dc.subject | Theory of Mind | en |
| dc.subject | preschool children | en |
| dc.subject | Narrative | en |
| dc.title | 兒童認知能力與記憶暗示性發展之關聯性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Development of Children's Cognitive Abilities and Suggestibility | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林慧麗;趙儀珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hui-Li Lin;Yee-San Teoh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 學前兒童,學齡兒童,記憶暗示性,心智理論,記憶敘說, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | preschool children,school-aged children,Suggestibility,Theory of Mind,Narrative, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302379 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-08-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 4.51 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。