Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89013
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳惠美zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHui-Mei Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳一諾zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYi-Nuo Chenen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T16:46:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-08-16-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-08-
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
中文部分
1.中華民國教育部(2002)。臺灣中小學學生體適能常模。https://www.fitness.org.tw/model01.php
2.中華民國教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw
3.王佩蓮(1995)。各級學校環境教育的內容與教學法。教育資料集刊,20,113-116。
4.王美芬、熊召弟(2001)。國民小學自然科技教材教法. 心理出版社。
5.全國法規資料庫(2023)。環境教育法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=o0120001
6.全國法規資料庫(2023)。環境教育設施場所認證及管理辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0120004
7.吳鈴築、王鴻濬(2012)。環境教育設施場所認證之實務分析. 鄉村旅遊研究,6(1),1–13。https://doi.org/10.30169/JRTR.201206.0001
8.李崑山(2006)。國民小學戶外教學現況與挑戰~ 由資深教師的角度觀之。台灣教育,(642),6-10。https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.200612.0006
9.高翠霞、張育傑、謝濬安(2013)。臺灣環境教育設施場所認證現況探討。2013年中華民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會,臺中市,臺灣。
10.張可欣、蔣佳玲(2012)。新北市國小教師環境認知,態度與行為意向之關係。生物科學,54(2),20-32。https://doi.org/10.29981/CB.201212.0002
11.張淵舜(2002)。美術館學習單的理論與實務:學習單企劃手冊。高雄串門出版公司發行。
12.黃琬淇、周淵清、許睿、廖翊含、周頌安(2021)。虛擬實境技術於工程實務之應用。土木水利,48(1),17-21。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202102_48(1).0004
13.楊冠政(1992)。環境教育發展簡史。博物館學季刊。6(3),3-9。https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.199207_6(3).0002
14.趙家民、塗智慧(2011)。國小學童環境教育成效之研究-以嘉北國小為例。國教新知,58(1),69–86。https://doi.org/10.6701/TEEJ.201103_58(1).0005
15.蔡佩甄(2000)。學習單在網路視訊教學之應用與效能研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立東華大學教育研究所。
16.巖正傑、洪粕宸、杜珮君、許晉源、施凱茗(2021)。開發化學品虛擬實境危害通識教育訓練系統。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊, 29(3),73-84。https://doi.org/10.7005/JOSH.201112.0020
英文部分
1.Allcoat, D., & von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
2.Amabile, TM, Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal , 39 (5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
3.Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 164, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
4.Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Matthews, B., Simpson, K., Strugnell, G., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). The potential of 360-degree virtual reality videos to teach water-safety skills to children. Computers & Education, 163, 104096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104096
5.Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
6.Augustyniak, R. A., Ables, A. Z., Guilford, P., Lujan, H. L., Cortright, R. N., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2016). Intrinsic motivation: an overlooked component for student success. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 465-466. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00072.2016
7.Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Hughes, K. (2008). Environmental awareness, interests and motives of botanic gardens visitors: Implications for interpretive practice. Tourism management, 29(3), 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.006
8.Banchi, Y., Yoshikawa, K., & Kawai, T. (2020). Evaluating user experience of 180 and 360 degree images. Electronic Imaging, 32, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2020.2.SDA-244
9.Beck, J. G., Palyo, S. A., Winer, E. H., Schwagler, B. E., & Ang, E. J. (2007). Virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD symptoms after a road accident: An uncontrolled case series. Behavior therapy, 38(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.04.001
10.Björling, E. A., Sonney, J., Rodriguez, S., Carr, N., Zade, H., & Moon, S. H. (2022). Exploring the effect of a nature-based virtual reality environment on stress in adolescents. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.831026
11.Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of environmental education, 29(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809599124
12.Brooks, A. M., Ottley, K. M., Arbuthnott, K. D., & Sevigny, P. (2017). Nature-related mood effects: Season and type of nature contact. Journal of environmental psychology, 54, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.004
13.Brooks, J. O., Goodenough, R. R., Crisler, M. C., Klein, N. D., Alley, R. L., Koon, B. L., ... & Wills, R. F. (2010). Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accident analysis & prevention, 42(3), 788-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013
14.Buchanan, J., Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Maher, D. (2018). Promoting environmental education for primary school-aged students using digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), em1661. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100639
15.Buonincontri, P., Marasco, A., & Ramkissoon, H. (2017). Visitors’ experience, place attachment and sustainable behaviour at cultural heritage sites: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(7), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071112
16.Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814350938_0005
17.Cadiz, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffith, T. L. (2009). Developing and validating field measurement scales for absorptive capacity and experienced community of practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1035-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344494
18.Carman, J., Zint, M., Burkett, E., & Ibáñez, I. (2021). The role of interest in climate change instruction. Science Education, 105(2), 309-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21610
19.Chang, E., Kim, H. T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658-1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351
20.Chang, S. C., Hsu, T. C., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education, 146, 103758. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511548
21.Checa, D., & Bustillo, A. (2020). Advantages and limits of virtual reality in learning processes: Briviesca in the fifteenth century. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00389-7
22.Chen, G., & Sun, W. (2018). The role of botanical gardens in scientific research, conservation, and citizen science. Plant diversity, 40(4), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.006
23.Chen, S. W., Wang, H. H., Wei, C. F., Fwu, B. J., & Hwang, K. K. (2009). Taiwanese students' self-attributions for two types of achievement goals. The Journal of social psychology, 149(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.2.179-194
24.Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103910
25.Cho, B. H., Ku, J., Jang, D. P., Kim, S., Lee, Y. H., Kim, I. Y., ... & Kim, S. I. (2002). The effect of virtual reality cognitive training for attention enhancement. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770516
26.Classen, S., Levy, C., Meyer, D. L., Bewernitz, M., Lanford, D. N., & Mann, W. C. (2011). Simulated driving performance of combat veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000893
27.Coulter, R., Saland, L., Caudell, T., Goldsmith, T. E., & Alverson, D. (2007). The effect of degree of immersion upon learning performance in virtual reality simulations for medical education. InMedicine Meets Virtual Reality, 15, 155. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042871-200701010-00099
28.Dennison, M. S., Wisti, A. Z., & D’Zmura, M. (2016). Use of physiological signals to predict cybersickness. Displays, 44, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2016.07.002
29.Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education, 9(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087906153_003
30.Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
31.Duque, L. C., & Weeks, J. R. (2010). Towards a model and methodology for assessing student learning outcomes and satisfaction. Quality assurance in education, 18(2), 84-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011035321
32.Erdoğan, M. (2009). Fifth grade students’ environmental literacy and the factors affecting students’ environmentally responsible behaviors. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063019-17
33.Forlim, C. G., Bittner, L., Mostajeran, F., Steinicke, F., Gallinat, J., & Kühn, S. (2019). Stereoscopic rendering via goggles elicits higher functional connectivity during virtual reality gaming. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 13, 365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00365
34.Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(14)60028-2
35.Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
36.Fröhlich, G., Sellmann, D., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). The influence of situational emotions on the intention for sustainable consumer behaviour in a student-centred intervention. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 747-764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749977
37.Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. American journal of preventive medicine, 20(3), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90489-6.00006-9
38.Gagné, M., Hamel, C., Lauzier, S., Penney, S. E., Bourbeau, J., Moisan, J., & Boulet, L. P. (2021). Comparative educational outcomes of an active versus passive learning continuing professional development activity on self-management support for respiratory educators: A non-randomized controlled mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 57, 103256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103256
39.Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005
40.Gómez-Tone, H. C., Bustamante Escapa, J., Bustamante Escapa, P., & Martin-Gutierrez, J. (2021). The drawing and perception of architectural spaces through immersive virtual reality. Sustainability, 13(11), 6223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116223
41.Goudas, M., Biddle, S., & Fox, K. (1994). Achievement goal orientations and intrinsic motivation in physical fitness testing with children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.6.2.159
42.Greenwald, S. W., Kulik, A., Kunert, A., Beck, S., Fröhlich, B., Cobb, S., ... & Maes, P. (2017). Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. International Society of the Learning Sciences.. Philadelphia, PA. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02009711
43.Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
44.Guo, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Chai, J., Li, W., Fu, L., ... & Gong, Y. (2020). A virtual reality simulation method for crowd evacuation in a multiexit indoor fire environment. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120750
45.Gutierrez, M., Vexo, F., & Thalmann, D. (2008). Stepping into virtual reality. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-117-6_5
46.Hermans, M., & Korhonen, J. (2017). Ninth graders and climate change: Attitudes towards consequences, views on mitigation, and predictors of willingness to act. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1330035
47.Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of educational research, 70(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151
48.Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Maldonado, J. L. T., & Millán, C. L. (2017). Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between Photographs, 360 Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. Applied ergonomics, 65, 398-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006
49.Himmelfarb, S. (1993). Eagly and Chaiken (Ed) The Psychology of Attitudes. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.693
50.Hsieh, C. H., & Li, D. (2022). Understanding how virtual reality forest experience promote physiological and psychological health for patients undergoing hemodialysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1007396. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860353-0/50008-2
51.Hsin, L. J., Chao, Y. P., Chuang, H. H., Kuo, T. B., Yang, C. C., Huang, C. G., ... & Lee, L. A. (2022). Mild simulator sickness can alter heart rate variability, mental workload, and learning outcomes in a 360° virtual reality application for medical education: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Virtual Reality, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00688-6
52.Hsu, W. C., Tseng, C. M., & Kang, S. C. (2018). Using exaggerated feedback in a virtual reality environment to enhance behavior intention of water-conservation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080520667-8
53.Hu, S., Tao, Z., & Xu, J. (2018). The Rising of Green Society: Low-Carbon Consumption as a Result of Environmental Education in China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2169-2183. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85939
54.Huang, J., Lucash, M. S., Scheller, R. M., & Klippel, A. (2019). Visualizing Ecological Data in Virtual Reality. 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 1311–1312. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797771
55.Hui, J., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., Di, W., Zhang, L., & Zhang, S. (2022). Research on art teaching practice supported by Virtual Reality (VR) technology in the primary schools. Sustainability, 14(3), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031246
56.Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Influences of an inquiry‐based ubiquitous gaming design on students’ learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 950-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12464
57.Hwang, Y., Ko, Y., Shim, S. S., Ok, S. Y., & Lee, H. (2023). Promoting engineering students’ social responsibility and willingness to act on socioscientific issues. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13051-9
58.Ikonen, T. S., Antikainen, T., Silvennoinen, M., Isojärvi, J., Mäkinen, E., & Scheinin, T. M. (2012). Virtual reality simulator training of laparoscopic cholecystectomies—a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of surgery, 101(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749691210100102
59.Janiszewski, M., Uotinen, L., Merkel, J., & Rinne, M. (2020). Virtual Reality Learning Environments for Rock Engineering, Geology and Mining Education. 54th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8179-6.ch010
60.Jung, C., Wolff, G., Wernly, B., Bruno, R. R., Franz, M., Schulze, P. C., ... & Kelm, M. (2022). Virtual and augmented reality in cardiovascular care: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Cardiovascular Imaging, 15(3), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.08.017
61.Jung, E. Y., Park, D. K., Lee, Y. H., Jo, H. S., Lim, Y. S., & Park, R. W. (2012). Evaluation of practical exercises using an intravenous simulator incorporating virtual reality and haptics device technologies. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 458-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.012
62.Kalawsky, R. S. (2000, March). The validity of presence as a reliable human performance metric in immersive environments. In 3rd International Workshop on Presence (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2013.3
63.Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1037/030621
64.Karimi, S. (2016). Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 769-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.014
65.Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology, 3(3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
66.Kirner, C., & Kirner, T. G. (2011). Evolução e tendências da Realidade Virtual e da Realidade Aumentada. Realidade Virtual e Aumentada: Aplicações e Tendências. Cap, 1, 10-25. https://doi.org/10.5753/svr_estendido.2020.12957
67.Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 32(5), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.2307/749801
68.Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The Measurement of Attitudes. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612823-9
69.Larson, L. R., Castleberry, S. B., & Green, G. T. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.5647/jsoee.23.3_114
70.Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745426
71.LaViola Jr, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM Sigchi Bulletin, 32(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344
72.Lee, G. I., & Lee, M. R. (2018). Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads. Surgical endoscopy, 32, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5634-6
73.Lee, G. I., & Lee, M. R. (2018). Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads. Surgical endoscopy, 32, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5634-6
74.Lee, J. H., McCullouch, B. G., & Chang, L. M. (2008). Macrolevel and microlevel frameworks of experiential learning theory in construction engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 134(2), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(158)
75.Léger, M. T., & Mekari, S. (2022). Simulating the Benefits of Nature Exposure on Cognitive Performance in Virtual Reality: A Window into Possibilities for Education and Cognitive Health. Brain Sciences, 12(6), 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060725
76.Leppänen, U., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2005). Beginning readers' reading performance and reading habits. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(4), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00281.x
77.Lewis, C. A. (1996). Green nature/human nature: the meaning of plants in our lives. University of Illinois press. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.34-1538
78.Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2014). The effects of children's age and sex on acquiring pro-environmental attitudes through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.875511
79.Liou, W. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2018, February). Virtual reality classroom applied to science education. In 2018 23rd International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT) . IEEE.Zabljak, Montenegro. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIT.2018.8350861
80.Liu, Y., Hau, K. T., Liu, H., Wu, J., Wang, X., & Zheng, X. (2020). Multiplicative effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance: A longitudinal study of Chinese students. Journal of personality, 88(3), 584-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12512
81.Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
82.Maraj, C. S., Badillo-Urquiola, K. A., Martinez, S. G., Stevens, J. A., & Maxwell, D. B. (2017). Exploring the impact of simulator sickness on the virtual world experience. In Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training and Education: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors, Business Management and Society, July 27-31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Springer International Publishing. Florida, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_59
83.Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364
84.Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a
85.McCauley, M. E., & Sharkey, T. J. (1992). Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.311
86.Milfont, T. L. (2007). Psychology of environmental attitudes: A cross-cultural study of their content and structure. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Auckland. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2012.0058
87.Millais, P., Jones, S. L., & Kelly, R. (2018). Exploring Data in Virtual Reality: Comparisons with 2d Data Visualizations. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qr6smr.27
88.Min, B. C., Chung, S. C., Min, Y. K., & Sakamoto, K. (2004). Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Applied ergonomics, 35(6), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002
89.Morgan, S. C., Hamilton, S. L., Bentley, M. L., & Myrie, S. (2009). Environmental education in botanic gardens: Exploring brooklyn botanic garden's project green reach. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(4), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.4.35-52
90.Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism. Annals of tourism research, 23(2), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2
91.Moss, J. D., & Muth, E. R. (2011). Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Human factors, 53(3), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811405196
92.Mostajeran, F., Krzikawski, J., Steinicke, F., & Kühn, S. (2021). Effects of exposure to immersive videos and photo slideshows of forest and urban environments. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83277-y
93.Mounce, R., Smith, P., & Brockington, S. (2017). Ex situ conservation of plant diversity in the world’s botanic gardens. Nature Plants, 3(10), 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0019-3
94.Naimark, M. (1991). Elements of Real-Space Imaging: A Proposed Taxonomy. In Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II, 1457, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.46305
95.Nord, A., Svensson, L., Hult, H., Kreitz-Sandberg, S., & Nilsson, L. (2016). Involvement of elite athletes in a CPR educational program for seventh grade students did not influence practical CPR skills or willingness to act: Report from a cluster-randomized trial. Resuscitation, 106, e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.117
96.Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The journal of environmental education, 31(4), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598649
97.Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23, 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
98.Park, G. D., Allen, R. W., Fiorentino, D., Rosenthal, T. J., & Cook, M. L. (2006). Simulator Sickness Scores According to Symptom Susceptibility, Age, and Gender for an Older Driver Assessment Study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(26), 2702–2706. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605002607
99.Parkin, D. (1998). Is outdoor education environmental education?. Environmental Education and information, 17, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.5647/jsoee.23.2_14
100.Pernau, M. (2014). Space and emotion: building to feel. History Compass, 12(7), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12170
101.Pressick-Kilborn, K. J. (2015). Canalization and connectedness in the development of science interest. Interest in mathematics and science learning. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_20
102.Ramkissoon, H. (2015). Authenticity, satisfaction, and place attachment: A conceptual framework for cultural tourism in African island economies. Development Southern Africa, 32(3), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2015.1010711
103.Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2016). Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality, 20, 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9
104.Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A., & Renninger, A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807430-10
105.Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v11n02_06
106.Rupp, M. A., Odette, K. L., Kozachuk, J., Michaelis, J. R., Smither, J. A., & McConnell, D. S. (2019). Investigating learning outcomes and subjective experiences in 360-degree videos. Computers & Education, 128, 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.015
107.Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Plant, R. W. (1990). Emotions in nondirected text learning. Learning and individual differences, 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(90)90014-8
108.Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., & Taneja, P. (2019). A review of nontraditional teaching methods: Flipped classroom, gamification, case study, self-learning, and social media. Education Sciences, 9(4), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040273
109.Sanchez-Cabrero, R., Costa-Roman, O., Pericacho-Gómez, F. J., Novillo-Lopez, M. A., Arigita-García, A., & Barrientos-Fernandez, A. (2019). Early virtual reality adopters in Spain: sociodemographic profile and interest in the use of virtual reality as a learning tool. Heliyon, 5(3), e01338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01338
110.Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651
111.Sangani, K. (2009). A sight for sore eyes?. Engineering & Technology, 4(19), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2009.1903
112.Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
113.Schiopu, A. F., Hornoiu, R. I., Padurean, A. M., & Nica, A. M. (2022). Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism. Technology in Society, 71, 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102091
114.Schuemie, M. J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., & Van Der Mast, C. A. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 4(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117884
115.See, Z. S., & Cheok, A. D. (2015). Virtual reality 360 interactive panorama reproduction obstacles and issues. Virtual Reality, 19(2), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-014-0258-9
116.Sellmann, D. (2014). Environmental education on climate change in a botanical garden: adolescents’ knowledge, attitudes and conceptions. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 286-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.870130
117.Shin, H. T., Kim, S. J., & Sung, J. W. (2020). Keyword Analysis of Arboretums and Botanical Gardens Using Social Big Data. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 23(2), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2020.23.2.233
118.Shomon, J. J. (1964). Manual of Outdoor Conservation Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400811
119.Silva, S., & Carvalho, P. (2019). Visiting Gardens in Portugal: Profiling the Historic Gardens Visit and Visitors. Tourism Innovation, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022814-9
120.Solomon, R., Giganti, M. J., Weiner, A., & Akpinar-Elci, M. (2013). Water safety education among primary school children in Grenada. International journal of injury control and safety promotion, 20(3), 266-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2012.717083
121.Stanney, K. M., Hale, K. S., Nahmens, I., & Kennedy, R. S. (2003). What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Human factors, 45(3), 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.504.27254
122.Stoner, H. A., Fisher, D. L., & Mollenhauer, M. (2011). Simulator and scenario factors influencing simulator sickness. Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine, and psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10836-15
123.Sulisworo, D., Erviana, V. Y., Robiin, B., Sepriansyah, Y., & Soleh, A. (2022). The Feasibility of Enhancing Environmental Awareness using Virtual Reality 3D in the Primary Education. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8179-6.ch009
124.Tak, N. Y., Lim, H. J., Lim, D. S., Hwang, Y. S., & Jung, I. H. (2023). Effect of self‐learning media based on 360° virtual reality for learning periodontal instrument skills. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12769
125.Tu, M., Zhang, B., Xu, J., & Lu, F. (2020). Mass media, information and demand for environmental quality: Evidence from the “Under the Dome”. Journal of Development Economics, 143, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102402
126.Türel, A., & Ayşe Gür, E. (2019). Effects of primary school’s physical environment on children’s spatial perception and behavior: the case of Kagithane, Istanbul, Turkey. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(2), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0048
127.Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D., Jung, T. H., & Tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism management, 66, 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003
128.Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments in Europe: Facilitators and barriers to future development. Self-Regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-654-0_6
129.Valmaggia, L. (2017). The use of virtual reality in psychosis research and treatment. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 246. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20443
130.Villani, D., Repetto, C., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2012). May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.008
131.Wohlgenannt, I., Simons, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2020). Virtual reality. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 455-461. https://doi.org/10.5772/12938
132.Wu, W. L., Hsu, Y., Yang, Q. F., Chen, J. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2021). Effects of the self-regulated strategy within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on students’ learning performances in an art history class. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1878231
133.Yeung, A. S., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2011). Primary and secondary students’ motivation in learning English: Grade and gender differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.001
134.Yildirim, C. (2019). Cybersickness during VR gaming undermines game enjoyment: A mediation model. Displays, 59, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2019.07.002
135.Zelenika, I., Moreau, T., Lane, O., & Zhao, J. (2018). Sustainability education in a botanical garden promotes environmental knowledge, attitudes and willingness to act. Environmental education research, 24(11), 1581-1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1492705
136.Zhang, S. N., Li, Y. Q., Ruan, W. Q., & Liu, C. H. (2022). Would you enjoy virtual travel? The characteristics and causes of virtual tourists’ sentiment under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism management, 88, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104429
137.Zhao, J., Lafemina, P., Carr, J., Sajjadi, P., Wallgrün, J. O., & Klippel, A. (2020). Learning in the Field: Comparison of Desktop, Immersive Virtual Reality, and Actual Field Trips for Place-Based STEM Education. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.1581091793502
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89013-
dc.description.abstract環境教育可提高學習者的學習興趣、提升知識,並建立良好的自然環境保護態度。戶外環境教育地點選擇,因空間距離或是惡劣天氣等阻礙倍受限制;現今面臨疫情時代,更加限縮戶外教育的機會。虛擬實境(virtual reality, VR)具有不受時空限制的特性,若能應用VR進行環境教育,不僅可以節省戶外旅遊之成本與風險,更能擴增環境教育場景選擇、提高環境教育頻率。過去少有研究將VR應用於環境教育,本研究嘗試運用VR於國小學童之自然環境教育,並透過學習成效評估瞭解VR環境教育之可行性。研究的目主要有:1.探討VR與現地教學模式下之學習成效指標(學習興趣、學習知識、行爲傾向)彼此關聯之差異;2.比較應用VR在自然與人文兩種場所之學習成效差異;3.探討VR教學時自主學習行對學習成效的影響;4.探討VR教學時暈眩感對學習成效的影響。
本研究選擇臺北植物園及板橋林家花園為案例。臺北植物園是臺灣北部唯一都會型植物園,而林家花園是台灣保存較爲完整的園林建築國定古蹟,兩園區均提供團體預約導覽服務及學習單等教學工具,以推廣環境教育。本研究VR解說媒體主要根園區志工解說之內容進行製作,並編製學習單做為學習知識評量工具。媒體製作時先經與一位資深解說員訪談後設定以主題並規劃解說場景與內容;之後以Gopro Max攝影機拍攝解說員在植物園現地及林家花園現地實景之360°環景教學影片;再利用Virti軟體進行VR影片後置編輯,並利用此軟體之「熱點」按鈕編輯功能在各場景增添額外的文字與圖像解說讓受測者自由選擇,做為受測者自主學習之行為評估。受測者選擇臺北市某國小兩班中年級學生為研究對象,共計104人參與。請受測者於教室內配戴Google紙盒眼鏡並搭配手機,自由觀賞臺北植物園及林家花園360度環景之VR環境教育影片,過程中同步錄製每位受測者的觀看內容,據此計算熱點按鈕使用次數以評估自主學習行爲;結束後填寫問卷,內容包括:以1-5個等級尺度測量學習興趣、學習知識、行爲傾向以及VR暈眩感等問項。
研究結果發現,透過VR進行自然與文化場域之環境教育,在自然場景的VR教學下,學生表現出更好的學習興趣(p=.00)與行爲傾向(p=.03);學習興趣會提升影響行為傾向;但在文化場域VR暈動症卻會降低學習興趣(p=.00)。此外,瀏覽解説時按熱點次數越多者其學習單答對率越高,表示VR自主學習行為會正向影響學習知識表現。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental education can enhance learners' interest in learning, improve their knowledge, and build good attitudes toward protecting the natural environment. The choice of outdoor environmental education sites is limited due to space distance or inclement weather; now that we are facing an epidemic era, the opportunities for outdoor education are even more limited. Virtual reality (VR) has the feature of not being limited by time and space, and if VR can be applied to environmental education, it can not only save the cost and risk of outdoor travel, but also expand the choice of environmental education scenes and increase the frequency of environmental education. In this study, we attempted to apply VR to the natural environment education of elementary school children and to understand the feasibility of VR environmental education through learning effectiveness evaluation. The main objectives of the study are: 1. to investigate the differences between the learning effectiveness indicators (learning interest, learning knowledge, and behavioral tendencies) of VR and in situ teaching mode; 2. to compare the learning effectiveness of VR application in natural and humanistic settings; 3. to investigate the effect of independent learning behavior on learning effectiveness during VR teaching; and 4. to investigate the effect of vertigo on learning effectiveness during VR teaching.
In this study, the Taipei Botanical Garden and the Panchiao Lin Family Garden were selected as case studies. The Taipei Botanical Garden is the only metropolitan botanical garden in northern Taiwan, and the Lin Family Garden is a national monument with a relatively well-preserved landscape architecture in Taiwan. In this study, the VR interpretation media was produced based on the content of the garden volunteers' interpretation, and the learning sheets were compiled as a tool to assess the learning knowledge. The media was produced by interviewing an experienced narrator and then setting the theme and planning the scenes and contents of the narration; after that, a 360° video of the narrator's live scenes in the Botanical Garden and Lin's Garden was filmed with a Gopro Max camera. The "Hotspot" button editing function of the software was used to add additional text and graphic explanations to each scene for the test subjects to freely choose, as a behavioral assessment of their independent learning. Two classes of middle grade students from Daan Elementary School in Taipei City were selected as the subjects, and 104 students participated in the study. The participants were asked to wear Google carton glasses and cell phones in the classroom and freely watch the 360-degree environmental education videos of the Taipei Botanical Garden and Lin's Garden, At the end of the study, the questionnaire was filled out to measure interest in learning, learning knowledge, behavioral tendencies, and VR vertigo on a scale of 1-5.
The results of the study revealed that students showed better interest in learning (p=.00) and behavioral tendencies (p=.03) when taught through VR in natural and cultural settings; interest in learning increased behavioral tendencies; but VR motion sickness in cultural settings decreased interest in learning (p=.00). In addition, the higher the number of hotspots clicked when browsing the explanation, the higher the answer rate of the study sheet, indicating that VR self-directed learning behavior positively affects learning knowledge performance.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-16T16:46:02Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-08-16T16:46:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
內容
口試委員審定書 I
致謝 II
目錄 III
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
中文摘要 VIII
Abstract X
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 環境教育的意義與成效評估 5
一、環境教育之定義與範圍 5
二、環境教育場所之類型 6
三、環境教育目標及評估方法 7
第二節 虛擬實境在教學的應用 10
一、虛擬實境的特性與發展 10
二、虛擬實境在教學中的應用 11
三、虛擬實境對學習成效的影響 12
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 研究架構與假設 13
一、研究架構圖 13
二、研究假設 13
第二節 研究地點及對象 15
一、研究地點 15
二、研究對象與實驗分派 15
第三節 教學內容設計 17
一、臺北植物園 17
二、板橋林本源園邸 27
第四節 研究工具 38
一、VR教學影片製作 38
1.拍攝360度環景影片 38
2.剪輯製作VR教學影片 39
3.播放VR教學影片 40
二、學習成效評量問卷 41
1.個人基本資料 43
2.認知部分 43
3.學習興趣 44
4.行為傾向 45
5.VR暈眩感 46
第五節 實驗流程 48
一、現地組環境教育流程 48
二、VR組環境教育流程 49
第四章 研究結果 51
第一節 樣本特性資料分析 51
第二節 VR與現地教學模式下之學習成效差異比較 52
一、各組學習成效描述性統計 52
1.學習興趣 52
2.學習知識 52
3.行爲傾向 52
二、自然場域下VR與現地教學模式下之學習成效差異比較 53
三、文化場域下VR與現地教學模式下之學習成效差異比較 54
第三節 自然與文化場所之VR學習成效差異比較 56
第四節 VR教學時自主學習行為對學習成效之影響 57
一、自然場域下VR教學時自主學習行為對學習成效之影響 57
二、文化場域下VR教學時自主學習行為對學習成效之影響 57
第五節 VR教學中暈眩感對學習成效之影響 59
一、自然場域VR教學中暈眩感對學習成效之影響 59
二、文化場域VR教學中暈眩感對學習成效之影響 60
第六節 學習興趣與學習知識和行為傾向之關連 61
一、學習興趣與學習知識之關聯 61
二、學習興趣與行爲傾向之關聯 62
三、學習知識與行爲傾向之關聯 63
第五章 結果與討論 65
第一節 結果討論 65
一、VR教學可代替現地教學 65
二、VR戶外環境教育教學適合應用在自然場域主題 66
三、自主學習行爲對知識表現有積極影響 67
四、VR暈動症會影響文化場域環教之學習興趣 67
五、學習成效間有關聯 68
第二節 研究限制與建議 69
參考文獻 71
附錄一 臺北植物園「濕生野地」學習單 88
附錄二 板橋林本源園邸「歡樂行」低年級學習單 90
附錄三 板橋林本源園邸「古蹟時光巡禮」高年級學習單 91
附錄四 臺北植物園學習單設計 95
附錄五 板橋林本源園邸學習單設計 101
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject環境保護zh_TW
dc.subject行為傾向zh_TW
dc.subject學習行為zh_TW
dc.subject學習興趣zh_TW
dc.subjectlearning interesten
dc.subjectlearning behavioren
dc.subjectbehavioral tendencyen
dc.subjectenvironmental protectionen
dc.title應用虛擬實境進行戶外環境教育解說成效之評估zh_TW
dc.titleEvaluation of the Effect of Outdoor Environmental Education Interpretation Using Virtual Realityen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee余家斌;凃宏明;林寳秀;林詠能zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChia-Pin Yu;Hung-Ming Tu;Bau-Show Lin;Yung-Neng Linen
dc.subject.keyword學習行為,學習興趣,行為傾向,環境保護,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordlearning behavior,learning interest,behavioral tendency,environmental protection,en
dc.relation.page106-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202302970-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-09-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系-
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
14.17 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved