Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88971
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃麗君zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLi-Chun Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃彥哲zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYen-Jer Huangen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T16:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-08-16-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-01-
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
王永福(2020)。新北市國中小學家長為孩童有機營養午餐之支付意願——計畫行為理論的解析 〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學。
行政院農業委員會(2022)。臺閩地區畜禽飼養場數及在養量比較。作者。
邱皓政(2010)。量化統計與研究。五南圖書。
林妙娟、丁全孝(1999)。有機農產品的消費研究。花蓮區農業改良所研究會報,17,21-41。
林俊男(2019)。臺灣農民採用友善環境耕作法的關鍵因素與推廣策略。菇類智慧化生產與農場經營管理研討會專刊。
林肇榮、王淑美 (2021)。行銷訴求與產銷履歷對消費者包裝米購買意願分析。 Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 68(1), 11-22。
周孟萱(2009)。消費者對雞蛋偏好與對動物福利願付價格之研究-聯合分析法之應用。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立宜蘭大學。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務運用。麗文。
洪兮雯、李佳蓉(2022)。消費者對於動物福祉友善豬肉之認知與願付價格分析。畜產研究, 55(1),68-80。
財團法人中央畜產會(2022)。中央畜產會有機畜產品及有機畜產加工品驗證廠商登錄名錄。作者。
陳昱亘(2020)。台灣消費者對有機雞蛋偏好之研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中興大學。
陳廣祐(2019)。畜產品有機驗證基準之法制研究—以維護動物福祉為中心。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。取自華藝線上圖書館系統。國立政治大學。
梁榮達(2013)。以方法目的鏈探討有機消費族群購買有機商品體驗的內涵與價值。台灣農學會報,14(6),565-580。
榮泰生(2006)。SPSS與研究方法。五南圖書。
劉思岑、李雅慧(2010)。消費者對有機農產品之知識與消費分析。台灣農學會報,11(5), 488-500。
鄭惠如、梁朝雲(2020)。消費者倫理與豬肉產銷履歷衍生之信任感和知覺品質對消費意願與願付價格之影響。台灣農學會報,21(2),91-117。
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Åkerfeldt, M. P., Gunnarsson, S., Bernes, G., & Blanco-Penedo, I. (2021). Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—a systematic mapping of current knowledge. Organic Agriculture, 11(1), 105-132.
Arbenz, M., Gould, D., & Stopes, C. (2017). ORGANIC 3.0—the vision of the global organic movement and the need for scientific support. Organic Agriculture, 7, 199-207.
Asif, M., Xuhui, W., Nasiri, A., & Ayyub, S. (2018). Determinant factors influencing organic food purchase intention and the moderating role of awareness: A comparative analysis. Food Quality and preference, 63, 144-150.
Carrero, I., Redondo, R., & Fabra, M. E. (2016). Who is behind the sustainable purchase? The sustainable consumer profile in grocery shopping in Spain. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6), 643-651.
de Oliveira Souza, A. C., da Silva, T. H., Bernardino, T., & Gameiro, A. H. (2021). Egg pricing and labeling on supermarkets in São Paulo. Pubvet, 15(6), 1-8
Dikmen, B. Y., Ipek, A. Y. D. I. N., Şahan, Ü., Petek, M. E. T. I. N., & Sözcü, A. (2016). Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry science, 95(7), 1564-1572.
Dinc‐Cavlak, O., & Ozdemir, O. (2021). Comparing the willingness to pay through three elicitation mechanisms: An experimental evidence for organic egg product. Agribusiness, 37(4), 782-803.
Feil, A. A., da Silva Cyrne, C. C., Sindelar, F. C. W., Barden, J. E., & Dalmoro, M. (2020). Profiles of sustainable food consumption: Consumer behavior toward organic food in southern region of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120690.
Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau. (2022). The world of organic agriculture: Statistics & emergingt trends 2022. FiBL IFOMA-Organics international.
Gangnat, I. D., Mueller, S., Kreuzer, M., Messikommer, R. E., Siegrist, M., & Visschers, V. H. (2018). Swiss consumers’ willingness to pay and attitudes regarding dual-purpose poultry and eggs. Poultry science, 97(3), 1089-1098.
Güney, O. I., & Giraldo, L. (2020). Consumers’ attitudes and willingness to pay for organic eggs: A discrete choice experiment study in Turkey. British Food Journal, 122(2), 678-692.
Hammeishøj, M. (2011). Organic and free-range egg production. Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg products, 463-486. Woodhead Publishing.
Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 287-299.
Hemmerling, S., Hamm, U., & Spiller, A. (2015). Consumption behaviour regarding organic food from a marketing perspective—a literature review. Organic Agriculture, 5, 277-313.
Katt, F., & Meixner, O. (2020). A systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100, 374-388.
Kucher, A., Heldak, M., Kucher, L., Fedorchenko, O., & Yurchenko, Y. (2019). Consumer willingness to pay a price premium for ecological goods: a case study from Ukraine. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 7(1), 38-49.
Liang, R. D. (2016). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the moderating effects of organic food prices. British Food Journal, 118(1), 183-199.
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000). Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite, 34(1), 55-59.
Mesas, A. E., Fernández-Rodríguez, R., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., López-Gil, J. F., Fernández-Franco, S., Bizzozero-Peroni, B., & Garrido-Miguel, M. (2022). Organic egg consumption: a systematic review of aspects related to human health. Frontiers in Nutrition, 1331.
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International journal of consumer studies, 32(2), 163-170.
Miranda-De La Lama, G. C., Estévez-Moreno, L. X., Sepulveda, W. S., Estrada-Chavero, M. C., Rayas-Amor, A. A., Villarroel, M., & María, G. A. (2017). Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products. Meat science, 125, 106-113.
Mohd Suki, N. (2016). Green product purchase intention: impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2893-2910.
Pawlewicz, A. (2020). Change of price premiums trend for organic food products: The example of the Polish egg market. Agriculture, 10(2), 35.
Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2020). Health motive and the purchase of organic food: A meta‐analytic review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(2), 162-171.
Sarti, S., Darnall, N., & Testa, F. (2018). Market segmentation of consumers based on their actual sustainability and health-related purchases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 270-280.
Situmorang, R. O. P., Tang, M. C., & Chang, S. C. (2022). Purchase Intention on Sustainable products: A Case study on Free-Range Eggs in Taiwan. Applied Economics, 54(32), 3751-3761.
Soroka, A., & Wojciechowska-Solis, J. (2019). Consumer motivation to buy organic food depends on lifestyle. Foods, 8(11), 581.
Sundrum, A. (2001). Organic livestock farming: a critical review. Livestock Production Science, 67(3), 207-215.
Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2005). Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. British food journal, 107(11), 808-822.
Teng, C. C., & Lu, C. H. (2016). Organic food consumption in Taiwan: Motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty. Appetite, 105, 95-105.
Testa, F., Sarti, S., & Frey, M. (2019). Are green consumers really green? Exploring the factors behind the actual consumption of organic food products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 327-338.
Von Essen, E., & Englander, M. (2013). Organic food as a healthy lifestyle: A phenomenological psychological analysis. International Journal of Qualitative studies on Health and Well-being, 8(1), 20559.
Webster, A. J. (2001). Farm animal welfare: the five freedoms and the free market. The veterinary journal, 161(3), 229-237.
汪盈利(2020年6月7日)。專訪林明鏘教授(上):台灣的動物保護法近乎於「寵物保護法」,這是公開的祕密。關鍵評論網。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/133189
有機農業全球資訊網(2022年8月12日)。有機驗證機構與標章一覽表。有機農業全球資訊網,有機驗證機構與標章一覽表。https://info.organic.org.tw/6003/
行政院(2018年7月3日)。重要政策-制定有機專法,邁向有機國家。行政院,政策與計畫,重要政策。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/df3bb9c5-358f-4512-8150-f9399a03b431
行政院農業委員會(2019年6月6日)。有機農產品有機轉型期農產品驗證基準與其生產加工分裝流通及販賣過程可使用之物質-驗證基準。有機農業全球資訊網,現行法令、行政規則與草案。https://info.organic.org.tw/7943/
行政院農業委員會農糧署(2021年5月9日)。有機農產品有機轉型期農產品標示及標章管理辦法。有機農產品有機轉型期農產品標示及標章管理辦法。https://www.afa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?act=download&ids=117265
財團法人中央畜產會(2022年12月31日)。畜產品價格查詢系統。財團法人中央畜產會,畜產品價格查詢系統。https://price.naif.org.tw/query/QueryNow.aspx
財團法人中央畜產會(2021年9月30日)。有機畜產品驗證認定評審標準-有機畜產品(第3.0版_110.9.30發行)。中央畜產會驗證中心有機畜產規範https://www.naif.org.tw/upload/234/20220330_110612.14338.pdf
棉花田官方網站(2023年4月15日)。門市據點。棉花田官方網站,門市據點https://www.healthyfood.com.tw/pages/棉花田門市
聖德科斯官方網站(2023年4日1日)。門市據點。聖德科斯官方網站,門市據點https://www.santacruz.com.tw/contact/store
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88971-
dc.description.abstract臺灣於2018年通過《有機農業促進法》,以全國農業有機化做為目標,有機農業耕作面積逐年上升,屢創高峰。然而有機畜產業卻在法規成立後至今皆無明顯增加產量。隨著有機農產品與消費者的距離越來越近,有機雞蛋對消費者而言亦日漸熟悉。如何從消費者的價值觀與態度出發制定行銷策略是影響消費者購買意願的重要因素。本研究透過測量消費者的永續態度,包含健康意識、環境永續意識、動物福利意識與可追溯意識等,並以願付價格與消費者對有機雞蛋的知識掌握度作為干擾因素,希望瞭解各因子間交互影響之關係,給有機雞蛋業者與政府機構作為參考。
本研究於有機店與農民市集發放問卷,並取得396份有效問卷進行統計分析,分析方式採用敘述性統計分析、因素分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與迴歸分析等。
研究結果指出,健康意識、環境永續意識、動物福利意識與有機雞蛋購買意願之間有顯著正相關;可追溯性意識則無顯著影響。願付價格不會干擾永續態度在有機雞蛋購買意願的影響,願付價格是獨立且顯著影響購買意願的因素。而產品的知識掌握度會干擾永續態度對消費者購買有機雞蛋之意願。
建議有機雞蛋業者應強調有機雞蛋在健康、環境永續與動物福利上之價值;政府機構與業者皆應採取更多行動,例如食農教育或與企業建立ESG合作關係,使消費者對於有機雞蛋之知識掌握度提升,進而增加有機雞蛋之購買意願。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTaiwan passed the "Organic Agriculture Promotion Act" in 2018 to scale up organic farming nationwide. Since then, Organic crop Production has been increasing significantly. However, the organic livestock industry has remained low since the legislation. In recent years, Taiwanese consumers have become familiar with plant-based organic products; in contrast, organic animal product is still a niche market. This research focused on understanding the values and attitudes of consumers towards organic eggs and aims to investigate crucial factors influencing their purchase intention.
This study measured consumers' sustainable attitudes, including health consciousness, environmental sustainability awareness, animal welfare awareness, and traceability awareness. Additionally, willingness to pay and consumers' knowledge perception of organic eggs are examined as moderating factors to explore their interactive effects. The author aimed to provide valuable insights for organic egg producers and government agencies to formulate effective promoting and marketing strategies for organic eggs.
The study distributed questionnaires at organic stores and farmers' markets, collecting 396 valid responses for statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics, factor analysis, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and regression analysis.
The findings revealed significant positive correlations among health consciousness, environmental sustainability awareness, animal welfare awareness, and consumers' purchase intention of organic eggs. However, traceability awareness does not exhibit a significant influence. Willingness to pay does not moderate the relationship between sustainable attitudes and consumers' purchase intention of organic eggs; however, it independently and significantly influences purchase intention. On the other hand, consumers' knowledge perception of organic eggs moderates the relationship between sustainable attitudes and their purchase intention.
To conclude, the result of this study suggested that organic egg producers should emphasize the value of organic eggs in terms of health, environmental sustainability, and animal welfare. Both government agencies and producers should take more actions, such as food and agricultural education or establishing ESG collaborations with enterprises, to enhance consumers' knowledge perception of organic eggs and subsequently increase their purchase intention.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-16T16:35:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-08-16T16:35:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章、緒論 1
弟二章、文獻回顧 5
第一節 全球與臺灣有機雞蛋產業趨勢相關研究 5
第二節 臺灣有機農業促進法與有機雞蛋相關法規 8
第三節 臺灣有機雞蛋市場發展現況 11
第四節 有機農產品消費者之購買意願 13
第五節健康意識相關研究 16
第六節環境永續意識相關研究 18
第七節動物福利意識相關研究 19
第八節食安與可追溯性意識相關研究 21
第九節產品掌握度相關研究 23
第十節有機雞蛋之價格 26
第三章、研究方法 28
第一節 研究架構 28
第二節 研究對象 29
第三節 問卷設計 30
第四節 資料分析 37
第四章、資料分析與結果 38
第一節 人口樣本分析 38
第二節 永續態度問卷信效度檢驗 42
第三節 永續態度與購買意願之人口變項差異性分析 45
第四節 永續態度相關性分析 52
第五節 願付價格與知識掌握度之干擾作用分析 54
第五章、結論與建議 57
第一節 研究結果與討論 57
第二節 實務意涵 60
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 62
參考文獻 63
中文文獻 63
英文文獻 65
網路文獻 69
附錄 70
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject有機雞蛋zh_TW
dc.subject健康意識zh_TW
dc.subject購買意願zh_TW
dc.subject環境永續意識zh_TW
dc.subject動物福利意識zh_TW
dc.subjectPurchase intentionen
dc.subjectHealth consciousnessen
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.subjectOrganic eggen
dc.subjectAnimal welfareen
dc.title永續態度對有機雞蛋購買意願之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Sustainability Attitudes on the Purchase Intention of Organic Eggsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王志文;黃慶鴻zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChih-Wen Wang;Ching-Hung Huangen
dc.subject.keyword有機雞蛋,購買意願,健康意識,環境永續意識,動物福利意識,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOrganic egg,Purchase intention,Health consciousness,Sustainability,Animal welfare,en
dc.relation.page82-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202302328-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-03-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學系-
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.11 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved