請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88916
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇彩足 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Tsai-Tsu Su | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳臻琳 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chen-Lin Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-16T16:20:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
丘昌泰,2009,《公共政策:基礎篇(第三版)》,臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。 朱澤民、孫克難,2006,《稅式支出效益評估具體內容及模式之研究》,財政部委託研究報告。 余致力,2000,〈民意與公共政策:表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究〉,《中國行政評論》,9(4),81-110。 林奕瑄,2021,《臺灣民眾對左右派政策偏好之探討》,新北市:國立臺北大學財政學系碩士論文。 俞振華、蔡佳泓,2011,〈社會公平與經濟發展:台灣民眾的政策意向之初探〉,《社會科學論叢》,5(2),135-172。 姚名鴻,2017,〈地方支出與財政幻覺之實證分析〉,《東吳政治學報》,35(1),1-27。 徐偉初、羅時萬、陳國樑,2019,《遺產稅及贈與稅稅式支出報告編製之研究》,財政部委託研究報告。 徐偉初、王肇蘭、陳國樑、黃德芬,2022,《稅式支出評估報告編製之研究》,財政部委託研究報告。 張正坤,2003,《我國所得稅租稅減免政策之政治經濟分析》,臺北市:國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。 郭乃菱,2018,《強化我國稅式支出制度課責性之研究》,科技部補助專題研究計畫。 黃德福、謝俊義、劉嘉薇,2009,《台灣民眾政治信任與政策偏好之研究》,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。 管倖生、阮綠茵、王明堂、王藍亭、李佩玲、高新發、黃鈴池、黃瑞菘、陳思聰、陳雍正、張文山、郭辰嘉、楊基昌、楊清田、童鼎鈞、董皇志、鄭建華、盧麗淑,2018,《設計研究方法(第四版)》,新北市:全華圖書股份有限公司。 陳文學、羅清俊,2002,〈影響臺灣民眾重分配政策偏好的因素〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,24(3),367-397。 陳國樑、黃勢璋,2013,〈財政困窘與稅式支出〉,中華經濟研究院網站,https://www.cier.edu.tw/news/detail/4574。 謝雨豆,2016,《稅式支出之評估:以產業創新條例為例》,臺北市:世新大學行政管理學系博士論文。 謝雨豆、郭昱瑩,2019,〈稅式支出於預算管理之問題研究〉,《財稅研究》,48(1),145-167。 顏啟安,2019,《立法委員稅式支出提案與通過因素之研究》,臺北市:國立臺灣大學公共事務研究所碩士論文。 鄭孟玉、蔡孟娟、陳龍秀,2020,〈綜合所得稅扣除額使用對租稅公平影響之探討〉,《財稅研究》,49(5),94-124。 鄭保志、李宜,2010,〈台灣政府各項移轉收支的重分配效果比較: 1976--2006 之全面性與局部性分析〉,《經濟論文叢刊》,38(2),233-288。 蘇彩足,1999,〈民主化對於政府預算決策的衝擊與因應之道〉,《理論與政策》,11(3),47-64。 蘇彩足、劉志宏、郭乃菱,2003,《財政透明與公共課責之研究》,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。 貳、西文部分 Avram, S. 2018. “Who Benefits from the ‘Hidden Welfare State’? The Distributional Effects of Personal Income Tax Expenditure in Six Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 28(3): 271–293. Barrios, S., F. Francesco, L. Gandullia, and S. Riscado. 2016. The Fiscal and Equity Impact of Tax Expenditures in the European Union; JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms No 1/2016, Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Burman, L. E., M. Phaup. 2012. “Tax Expenditures, the Size and Efficiency of Government, and Implications for Budget Reform.” Tax Policy and the Economy 26(1): 93-124. Chou, J., C. H. Fu. 2021. “Which Families Benefits from the Recent Personal Income Tax Reform in Taiwan: Evidence from the Administrative Data.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 43: 433-451. Clawson, R. A., Z. A. Oxley. 2021. Public Opinion: Democratic Ideals, Democratic Practice (4th ed.). Washington D.C.: CQ Press. Dziemianowicz, R. I., A. Kargol-Wasiluk, A. Wildowicz-Giegiel, A. Wyszkowski. 2018. “Tax Expenditures as an Example of Fiscal Illusion.” Optimum. Economic Studies 5(89): 85-98. Faricy, C., C. Ellis. 2014. “Public Attitudes toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures.” Political Behavior 36(1): 53-76. Guardino, M., S. Mettler. 2020. “Revealing the “Hidden Welfare State”: How Policy Information Influences Public Attitudes about Tax Expenditures.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3(1): 1-15. IMF. 2019. Tax Expenditure Reporting and Its Use in Fiscal Management: A Guide for Developing Economics. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Kraan, D. 2004. “Off-budget and Tax Expenditures.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 4(1):121-142. Meier, K. J., J. Bohte. 2007. Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. Mettler, S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. MN House Research. 2018. “Tax Expenditures vs. Direct Expenditures: A Primer.” https://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/pubs/taxvexp.pdf. Niskanen, W. A. 2004. ““Starve the Beast” Does Not Work.” Cato Policy Report 26(2): 2. Parsons, D. W. 1995. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot, UK; Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Pub. Ringe, N. 2005. “Policy Preference Formation in Legislative Politics: Structures, Actors, and Focal Points.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 731-745. Surrey, S. S. 1970. “Tax Incentives as a Device for Implementing Government Policy: A Comparison with Direct Government Expenditures.” Harvard Law Review 83(4): 705-738. Surrey, S. S. 1976. “The Tax Expenditure Concept and the Budget Reform Act of 1974.” Boston College Law Review 17(5): 679-737. Surrey, S. S., P. R. McDaniel. 1985. Tax expenditure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Toder, E. 2000. “Tax Cuts or Spending-Does it Make a Difference?” https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/63871/410261-Tax-Cuts-or-Spending-Does-it-Make-a-Difference-.pdf. Ura, J. D., E. M. Socker. 2011. “The Behavioral Political Economy of Budget Deficits: How Starve the Beast Policies Feed the Machine.” The Forum 9(2). Verbist, G., F. Figari. 2014. “The Redistributive Effect and Progressivity of Taxes Revisited: An International Comparison across the European Union.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 70(3): 405-429. Villela L., A. Lemgruber, M. Jorratt. 2010. Tax Expenditure Budgets Concepts and Challenges for Implementation. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank. Wlezien C. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):981-1000. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88916 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 稅式支出為政府預算支出型態之一,為政府透過稅制特殊規定以減少或免除特定對象納稅義務所產生之財政資源移轉,因其在制度本質與實際運作上皆呈現較隱藏且複雜之特性,致容易為社會大眾所忽略。惟在民主社會中,政府制定之政策是否有效回應民眾需求關乎其施政之正當性,而預算政策更應反映人民對財政資源使用優先順序之選擇。對此,本研究以問卷調查法探究一般社會大眾於不同政策目的類型之看法,且分別討論在不同人口背景及政策資訊下,民眾對於稅式支出之態度及其中之相關性。
研究發現我國多數民眾對稅式支出持支持態度,且相對較支持社會福利與環境保護稅式支出,惟經與實務比較,則呈現民眾偏好與政府實際運作不一致情形;再者,人口背景並非影響我國民眾對於稅式支出態度之主要因素,惟部分變數似可作為思考人口背景與稅式支出態度間關係時之判斷參考;最後,政策資訊為影響我國民眾對於稅式支出態度之因素,呈現我國民眾面對政府所為之稅式支出機制,隱含財政幻覺之存在。 鑑於前述研究發現,本研究提出以下研究建議。首先,行政、立法部門等政策參與者應提升社會大眾對稅式支出概念之了解;此外,政府應可加以思考在稅式支出機制上之資源分配與優先順序,並加強政策溝通,且應進一步提升稅式支出資訊之透明度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Tax expenditure is one of the forms of government budget expenditure. It involves the government using specific tax regulations to reduce or exempt certain entities from their tax obligations, resulting in the transfer of financial resources. Due to its hidden and complex nature in both institutional essence and practical operation, tax expenditure is often overlooked by the general public. However, in a democratic society, the effectiveness of government policies in responding to public needs is crucial for the legitimacy of governance, and budget policies should reflect the people’s choices regarding the prioritization of financial resource usage.
In this study, a questionnaire survey method was used to explore the general public’s views on different types of policy objectives related to tax expenditure. The research also discusses how public attitudes towards tax expenditure vary under different demographic variables and policy information scenarios, along with their correlations. The research findings indicate that the majority of people in Taiwan hold a supportive attitude towards tax expenditure, particularly in the areas of social welfare and environmental protection. However, when comparing preferences to actual government operations, a discrepancy is observed. Moreover, demographic variables do not seem to be the primary factor influencing public attitudes towards tax expenditure, though certain variables may offer insights into the relationship between demographic variables and attitudes. Finally, policy information is a significant factor influencing public attitudes towards tax expenditure, indicating the existence of fiscal illusions when facing the government’s tax expenditure mechanisms. Based on the aforementioned research findings, the study proposes the following research recommendations. Firstly, policy participants, including administrative and legislative departments, should enhance the public’s understanding of tax expenditure concepts. Additionally, the government should consider resource allocation and priority setting in tax expenditure mechanisms and strengthen policy communication while further enhancing the transparency of tax expenditure information. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-16T16:20:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-16T16:20:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
謝辭 III 中文摘要 V 英文摘要 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 7 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 稅式支出之內涵 9 第二節 稅式支出作為政策工具 11 第三節 民眾對稅式支出之態度 17 第四節 小結 22 第三章 研究設計 23 第一節 研究方法與設計 23 第二節 問卷設計 25 第三節 統計方法 29 第四章 稅式支出態度之分析 31 第一節 問卷回收情形與基本背景資料分析 31 第二節 政策目的與稅式支出態度之分析 36 第三節 人口背景與稅式支出態度之分析 47 第四節 政策資訊與稅式支出態度之分析 63 第五章 結論與建議 105 第一節 研究發現 105 第二節 研究建議 108 第三節 研究限制 110 參考文獻 113 附錄 119 附錄1 推估2023年度重大稅式支出項目及金額表 119 附錄2 本研究問卷調查 123 附錄3 我國2015年至2023年稅式支出評估政策目的態樣 127 附錄4 人口背景與稅式支出態度之交叉表與卡方檢定 130 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 我國民眾對稅式支出之態度 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Public Attitudes toward Tax Expenditures in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭昱瑩;郭乃菱 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Ying Kuo;Nai-Ling Kuo | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 稅式支出,民眾態度,政策目的,人口背景,政策資訊,財政幻覺, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Tax Expenditure,Public Attitude,Policy Objective,Demographic Variable,Policy Information,Fiscal Illusion, | en |
dc.relation.page | 141 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302216 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-09 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 3.22 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。