請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8887
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳湘鳳(shana smith) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ying-Ting Shen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 沈穎廷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:03:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:03:23Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Natraj, I., Yagnanarayanan, K., Kuiyang, L., Subramaniam, J., Karthik, R., 2003, “A Reconfigurable 3D Engineering Shape Search System Part I: Sharp Representation”, ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 1(23), pp. 89-98.
[2] Zhu, Y.Z., 2003, “A Study on Integrating the TRIZ Method with Functional Analysis”, Master Thesis. National Cheng Kung University. [3] Shieh, M.D., Yan, W., Chen, C.H., 2008, “Soliciting Customer Requirements for Product Redesign Based on Picture Sorts and ART2 Neural Network”, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, pp. 194–204. [4] Li, Z.S., Kou, F.H., Cheng, X.C., Wang, T., 2006, “Model-Based Product Redesign”, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6 (1), pp. 99-102. [5] Bovea, M.D., Wang, B., 2007, “Redesign Methodology for Developing Environmentally Conscious Products”, International Journal of Production Research, 45(18 & 19), pp. 4057-4072. [6] Kasarad, M.E., Terpenny, J.P., Inman, D., Precoda, K.R., Jelesko, J., Sahin, A., Park, J., 2007, “Design for Adaptability (DFAD)—A New Concept for Achieving Sustainable Design”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23, pp. 727–734. [7] Thevenot, H.J., Nanda, J., Simpson, T.W., 2006, “Redesign Product Families using Heuristics Shared Ontology Component Information”, Information Reuse and Integration, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, IRI-2006, pp. 330-335. [8] Alizon, F., Shooter, S.B., Simpson, T.W., 2007, “Improving an Existing Product Family Based on Commonality/Civersity, Modularity, and Cost”, Design Studies, 28(4), pp.387-409. [9] Janz, D., Sihn, W., 2005, “Product Redesign Using Value-Oriented Life Cycle Costing”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 54(1), pp. 9-12. [10] Lee, M.T., 2006, “A Study of Integrating QFD and TRIZ Into Breakthrough Umbrella Design Process For Ripe Old Age”, Master Thesis, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology. [11] Glenn, M., 2008, “Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ)”, Available at: <http://www.mazur.net/triz/>. Accessed on: Jan. 15th 2008. [12] Wu Z.M., 2007, “Product Eco-Innovation by Combining TRIZ and Integrated New Product Development Process”, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung. [13] Wu, L.K, 2007, “Application of Inventive Principle on Systematic Innovation”, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University. [14] Zhao, X., 2005, “Integrated TRIZ and Six Sigma Theories for Service/Process Innovation”, Services Systems and Services Management, 1, pp. 529-532. [15] Houng, 2007, “The Application of Biomimetics in Product Innovative Design”, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University. [16] 王通、徐人平、李剛,2008,“運用TRIZ和田口法的集成開發產品”,機電產品開發與創新,21(2),pp.50-52。 [17] Liu, C.C., 2003, “A Study of TRIZ Method Improvements and Eco-Innovative Design Methods”, Ph.D. Thesis, National Cheng Kung University. [18] Phadke, M.S., 1989, “Quality Engineering Using Robust Design”, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, Prentice-Hall. [19] Roy, R.K., 2001, “Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach”, New York, Wiley. [20] Introduction to TRIZ. Available at: < http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~apte/CV_PRA_TRIZ_INTRO.htm>. Accessed on: Jan. 30th 2009. [21] Optimal Design Laboratory of YZU - A Knowledge Service Provider, Available at: <http://designer.mech.yzu.edu.tw/>.Accessed on: Aug. 5th 2008. [22] What is an Inventive Problem. Available at: <http://www.ideationtriz.com/source/12_Inventive_Problem.htm>. Accessed on: Aug. 20th 2008. [23] Li-Xin Wang, 1996, “A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control”, NJ, USA, Prentice-Hall, Inc. [24] Chen, S., Hwang, C., 1996, “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making”, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 375, pp.466–482. [25] Shen, Z., Smith, S., 2005, “Optimizing The Functional Design and Life Cycle Cost of Mechanical Systems Using Genetic Algorithms”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27, pp. 1051-1057. [26] Domb, E., Miller, J., MacGran, E., 1998, “Explanation of the 39 Features of the Contradiction Matrix”, Available at: <http://www.triz-journal.com/ >. Accessed on: Nov. 15th 2008. [27] Chang, H.T., Chen, J.L., 2004, “The Conflict-Problem-Solving CAD Software Integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation”, Advances in Engineering Software, 35, pp. 553–566. [28] Chang H.T., 2003, “The Study of Eco-Innovative Design Integrating TRIZ with Extension Method”, Ph.D. Thesis, National Cheng Kung University. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8887 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在這個多元化市場的時代市場的需求不斷的再改變,相較於研發一樣新產品,重新改良、設計一件現有的產品,將能夠有效的縮短設計的時間週期以及成本。有鑑於此,本研究將提出一套通用的產品重新設計方法,以田口法、模糊理論與TRIZ為基礎進行產品設計。市面上許多新產品雖然有新功能或新設計,但這些新東西大部分都能在其他產品上看到,因此,一個需要被重新設計之產品若是能延用其他產品的既有元件達到產品升級的效果,便能縮短不少設計時間。另外,設計方向的規劃是產品設計或改良時最重要的階段,當產品加入新功能時,通常會有一些不明顯的矛盾隱匿在產品當中,若無法即早發現矛盾將會浪費許多時間及資金。總和以上原因,本研究將以把原本功能不足之產品額外加入不同產品的元件達成產品升級效果為前提,把設計重點放在解決元件結合時產生的衝突,完成產品之重新設計。本研究中的重點工作有以下幾點:
(1)找出不同產品元件結合時,產生矛盾衝突的元件。 (2)篩選出重要程度較高的元件,減少不必要的設計。 (3)使用TRIZ創新工具,消除元件之間組合時的矛盾現象,進而得到最佳元件組合,完成新產品的概念設計。 在產品設計初期,先將需要被重新設計的產品分解成數個元件,並使用模糊理論結合設計者與消費者對產品的意見,找出較重要的元件進行分析。為了能夠在設計初期就找出這些不明顯的矛盾,我們運用田口分析法的參數分析能力,找出存在交互作用的元件,並將產品之間的交互作用視為一種矛盾。有別於一般使用改變參數及修改參數階層的方法降低或消除交互作用的影響,我們使用TRIZ這個創新工具來消除這個被視為矛盾的交互作用。當矛盾被消除之後所有元件便可以合理的被組合在一起,完成一件新產品。論文最後以自行車結合健身車之功能做為研究範例,並完成兩個概念產品。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In industry, products often need to be redesigned, after they are on the market for some time, to adapt to new market trends. Compared with designing a new product from scratch, product redesign can reduce design cycle time and resources. The concept of product redesign is not extraordinary, but many prior studies only focus on particular products. A generic redesign method is needed. Additionally, product redesign often requires tackling problems related to improving the functions of a product. Introducing or adding new functions might cause some indistinct contradictions between the new and existing functions of the product. Often, such contradictions might not be found until the final design stage is reached. To find out contradictive information in short time and deal with the majority of products, we present a comprehensive redesign method using the Taguchi method, fuzzy theory, and TRIZ. The major assignments of this paper are described as follows.
(1) Find the contradictive components between the new functions and existing functions. (2) Reduce the unnecessary design by selecting more important components. (3) Eliminate the contradictions between the contradictive components by TRIZ. In the initial stage of the product design, products which need to be redesigned need to be decomposed into several components first. Then, designers can evaluate the importance of each component by fuzzy theory, based on the designers’ and consumers’ opinions. Thus, the more important components can be found for further analysis. With the proposed approach, the Taguchi method is used to find contradictions after obtaining the more important components. Taguchi control factors are replaced by product components. In the past, designers eliminated or decreased interactions by eliminating interactive parameters or changing the levels of interactive parameters. With the developed approach, component interactions are regarded as contradictive information. After finding interactive components, rather than removing the interactive components, TRIZ is used to eliminate the contradictions by keeping and improving the existing functions of the interactive components. After eliminating all contradictions, a conceptual design solution is created for the new product. Finally, a bike redesign example is introduced to illustrate and support the validity of the developed product redesign method. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:03:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96522634-1.pdf: 2267684 bytes, checksum: 0bc544bf20363bc3223e548c5dffbfc4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄............................................................................... ii
圖目錄............................................................................v 表目錄............................................................................vi 符號說明.........................................................................vii 中文摘要.........................................................................ix Abstract...........................................................................x 誌謝................................................................................xii 第一章 緒論.......................................................................1 1.1 研究動機.....................................................................1 1.2 研究目的及方法...........................................................2 1.3 相關文獻.....................................................................3 第二章 田口法、TRIZ與模糊理論.........................................5 2.1 田口法........................................................................5 2.1.1 品質損失函數............................................................5 2.1.2 實驗因子...................................................................6 2.1.3 直交表......................................................................6 2.1.4 參數設計...................................................................8 2.1.5 交互作用...................................................................8 2.2 TRIZ............................................................................9 2.2.1 使用三十九個工程參數與矛盾矩陣求解.......................11 2.2.2 分離原則.................................................................12 2.2.3 物質-場分析.............................................................12 2.2.4 ARIZ.......................................................................13 2.2.5 TRIZ中各方法的使用時機..........................................14 2.3模糊理論與應用............................................................15 2.3.1 模糊理論..................................................................15 2.3.2 將語意公式化...........................................................16 第三章 產品重新設計方法..................................................19 3.1 產品重新設計方法的流程介紹.......................................20 3.2 設計流程細節介紹...................................................... 22 3.2.1 步驟一:闡明計畫................................................... 22 3.2.2 步驟二:建立元件因子表......................................... 24 3.2.2.1 元件因子...............................................................24 3.2.2.2 購買因子和元件重要性評估....................................24 3.2.2.3 計算元件重要性之範例...........................................26 3.2.3 步驟三:選擇直交表................................................ 29 3.2.4 步驟四:分析結果................................................... 29 3.2.5 TRIZ求解................................................................ 29 3.2.6 步驟五:驗證結果....................................................31 第四章 案例研究...............................................................32 4.1 闡明計畫................................................................... 32 4.2 建立表格................................................................... 34 4.2.1 元件因子................................................................ 34 4.2.2 購買因子................................................................ 35 4.2.3 元件重要性評估.......................................................36 4.3 選擇直交表................................................................ 40 4.4 分析結果................................................................... 43 4.5 TRIZ求解....................................................................45 4.6 小結.......................................................................... 50 第五章 結論與討論........................................................... 51 參考文獻......................................................................... 52 附錄A 39個TRIZ工程參數................................................. 55 附錄B 矛盾矩陣............................................................... 56 附錄C 40個TRIZ發明原理................................................. 62 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 運用田口法、模糊理論以及TRIZ於產品之重新設計 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Product Redesign Using Taguchi Method, Fuzzy Theory, and TRIZ | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉正良,鍾添東 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 產品重新設計,田口法,TRIZ,模糊理論,交互作用, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Product redesign,Taguchi method,TRIZ,Fuzzy theory,Interactions, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 2.21 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。