請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88838完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 邱玉蟬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Chan Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李柏毅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-I Li | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:59:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王仁駿（2015）。農民參與植物醫師制度之意願分析。臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
田育志（2021年6月）。培訓重實戰，屏科大植醫出任務──不僅顧植物，更要帶動農產業提升。豐年雜誌，71(6)，48-53。 行政院（2022）。重要施政成果：食安五環。檢自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/C373BCE23CFF4324 安寶貞、蔡志濃（2009）。植物疫病菌之診斷技術開發。農業生技產業季刊，20，44-48。 李佳芳（2021年6月）。青年植醫上線，帶動健全減藥農業──嘉大植物醫師出診實況。豐年雜誌，71(6)，54-59。 李宜映、簡志丞、毛怡文（2019）。淺談國際農藥減量政策與策略。國際農業科技新知，84，11-17。 呂紹理（2015）。從螟蛉到螟害—近代臺灣的農業蟲害及其防治。臺大歷史學報，56，133-188。 林宗弘、蕭新煌、許耿銘（2018）。邁向世界風險社會？台灣民眾的社會資本、風險感知與風險因應行為。調查研究—方法與應用，40，127-166。 林怡均（2023年5月）。植醫下田記》邱柏勳被嗆「不會種、懂什麼？」斜槓種荔枝大豐收，示範減藥更有說服力。上下游新聞。檢自：https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/186685/ 林映彤（2022）。以計畫行為理論探討農民對植物醫師諮詢意願之研究。屏東科技大學植物醫學系碩士論文。 洪挺軒（2021）。氣候變遷果樹病蟲害相改變與因應措施。臺中區農業改良場特刊，143，141-151。 柯志明、翁仕杰（1991）。台灣農民的分類與分化。中央研究院民族所集刊，72， 107-150。 孫岩章（2012）。從植物醫學元年探討植物醫師的經濟效益。臺大農業推廣通訊雙月刊，91。檢自：http://ntucae.blog.ntu.edu.tw/2012/02/29/n91_02/ 孫岩章（2018）。植物醫生指南。臺北市：五南出版。 許如君、張嘉哲（2016）。農藥抗藥性管理指引 - 基礎篇（電子版）。農委會動植物防疫檢疫局發行。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/ws.php?id=16343 張世忠、胡仲祺（2004）。動植物病原診斷鑑定新技術─xMAP。農政與農情，143。檢自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=6857 張宏政（2004）農業草根知識發展之研究——卓蘭鎮葡萄栽培技術為例。台灣大學農業推廣學研究所博士學位論文。 張郁蔚、邵芷羚（2017）。從資訊來源觀點探討農民資訊尋求行為。圖書資訊學刊，15(2)，67-99。 莊彥輝、陳毓璟（2017）。新世代農民傳承農業知識學習歷程之研究—以彰化縣溪州鄉為例。農業推廣文彙，62，47-72。 陳均岳（2011）。台灣植物醫師制度績效與經濟效益之評估。臺灣大學植物病理與微生物學研究所學位論文。 陳昇寬（2014）。黃色黏紙及藍色黏紙對田間瓜實蠅之誘引效果比較。臺南區農業改良場研究彙報 65：29-37。 陳淑敏（2019年10月）。推動植物醫師制度相關問題之研析。立法院法制局研究成果議題研析。檢自：https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=188496 陳雅惠（2014）。台灣植物醫師制度之探討（行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局103年度科技計畫研究報告，PW10304-0958）。 陳慧萍（2021年6月）。作物健康才有食安，植物醫師守護全民健康。豐年雜誌，71(6)，18-19。 陳瑋芸、張嘉玲、李慧玅、楊千慧、劉芳銘、黃承澤、江徽之、林永賓、徐仁霞、馬惠珍、陳姵伃、陳純敏（2017）。105年度市售農產品殘留農藥監測。食品藥物研究年報，8，63-75。 黃應貴（1978）。農業機械化——一個臺灣中部農村的人類學研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，46，31-78。 農委會（2017）。農藥十年量減半，食安環保必加值。檢自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=agri&id=7159 農委會（2018）。植物醫師法草案總說明。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/redirect_files.php?id=27018&file_name=GSlashSGoi1vzA6n6p53mxlMWGEqualnmIk2gFkDDIjYnVT0ATCWGPlusBvwW 農委會（2021）。110年補助地方政府及基層農會聘用儲備植物醫師輔導農民示範計畫。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=massage&id=20158 農委會（2022）。111年補助地方政府及基層農會聘用儲備植物醫師輔導農民示範計畫。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=massage&id=20299 農委會（2023）。112年補助地方政府及基層農會聘用儲備植物醫師輔導農民示範計畫。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news&sub_theme=massage&id=20299 農委會（2023）。儲備植物醫師服務場域列表。檢自：https://www.baphiq.gov.tw/ws.php?id=17722 楊弘任（2002）。看不見的技術——「蓮霧變成黑珍珠」的技術發展史。科技醫療與社會，2，1-57。 楊弘任（2011）。何謂在地性？：從地方知識與在地範疇出發。思與言，49(4)，5-29。 楊秀珠（2001）。作物生產整合管理。農政與農情，110。檢自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2166 楊雨慈（2019）。植物健康問題診斷案例研究。屏東科技大學植物醫學系所碩士學位論文。 廖坤榮（2004）。台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效。政治科學論叢，22，181-220。 衛福部中醫藥司（2013）。問診概論。檢自：https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOCMAP/cp-774-5753-108.html 蔡介庭（2015）。芒果、盲目與忙碌：芒果生產與通路實作的社會過程分析──以玉井為例。臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士學位論文。 蔡培慧（2009）。農業結構轉型下的農民分化（1980—2005）。臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系博士學位論文。 蔡晏霖（2016）。農藝復興：臺灣農業新浪潮。文化研究，22，23-74。 蔡馨儀、歐陽瑋、顏辰鳳、陳子偉（2021年6月）。植醫制度勢在必行，提升植保量能，確保生產者收益。豐年雜誌，71(6)，20-25。 謝國雄（2003）。茶鄉社會誌：工資、政府與整體社會範疇。臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所出版。 藍佩嘉（2012）。質性個案研究法：紮根理論與延伸個案法。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、吳長萱、楊國樞（主編），社會及行為科學研究法（二）：質性研究法（頁61-91），臺北市：東華出版。 簡妤儒（2018）。治理抗生素：法律、專業與商業多重力量拉扯下的產業獸醫（科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告期末報告，MOST 105-2511-S-002-004-）。 簡妤儒（2021）。農漁業技術移轉制度的「轉譯」難題：以養蚵人工附苗技術為例。臺灣社會學刊，69，1-51。 顏碧吟（2008）。由農業資材行的運作看屏東平原1980年代以來蓮霧產業栽培技術的發展與擴散。臺灣文獻，59(4)，264-306。 顏辰鳳、陳宏伯、馮海東（2018）。臺灣植物醫師制度推動現況與展望。農政與農情，314，74-78。 葉守禮（2021）。地方後勤網絡：山城多樣化園藝農業的社會基礎與交換網絡。台灣鄉村研究，16，87-133。 甯順熙（2021）。我國植物醫師法制之研究。高雄大學政治法律學系碩士學位論文。 鄭博予（2017）。臺灣新農民的建構：一種新舊來回穿梭的實踐。陽明交通大學人文社會學系族群與文化碩士班碩士學位論文。 日本植物医科学協会（n.d.）Retrieved June, 26 2023, from: http://jaclips.jp/jaclips/plant_doctor.html 日本植物医師会（2022）。植物医師の活動。Retrieved from: http://jaclips.jp/joplad/img/PlantDoctorPamph_2022.pdf Agrios, G. N. (2001). The Doctor of Plant Medicine Program at the University of Florida: Growers, agricultural agencies, and industries need plant doctors. Plant Health Progress, 2(1), 19.Armstrong, N., & Hilton, P. (2014). Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility. Social Science & Medicine, 120, 208-214. Anderson, A., & Hobson‐West, P. (2022). “Refugees from practice”? Exploring why some vets move from the clinic to the laboratory. Veterinary Record, 190(1), e773. Annes, A., Wright, W., & Larkins, M. (2021). ‘A Woman in Charge of a Farm’: French women farmers challenge hegemonic femininity. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(1), 26-51. Arjomand, N. A. (2022). Empirical fiction: Composite character narratives in analytical sociology. The American Sociologist, 1-37. Bentley, J., Danielsen, S., Phiri, N., Tegha, Y., Nyalugwe, N., Neves, E., ... & Sharma, D. (2018). Farmer responses to technical advice offered at plant clinics in Malawi, Costa Rica and Nepal. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(2), 187-200. Bentley, J., Phir, N., Tegha, Y., Nyalugwe, N., Pindani, T., Danielsen, S. (2017). Delivering messages from plant clinics. The influence of communication on farmer’s perception and uptake of advice: Malawi. CABI Project Report. Retrieved from: https://www.cabi.org/cabi-publications/delivering-messages-from-plant-clinics-the-influence-of-communication-on-farmers-perception-and-uptake-of-advice-malawi/ Bentley, J., Sharma, A., Pandit, V., Danielsen, S. (2017). Delivering messages from plant clinics. The influence of communication on farmer’s perception and uptake of advice: Nepal. CABI Project Report. Retrieved from: https://www.cabi.org/cabi-publications/delivering-messages-from-plant-clinics-the-influence-of-communication-on-farmers-perception-and-uptake-of-advice-nepal/ Birner, R., Davis, K., Pender, J., Nkonya, E., Anandajayasekeram, P., Ekboir, J., ... & Cohen, M. (2009). From best practice to best fit: A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(4), 341-355. Blaxter, M. (1978). Diagnosis as category and process: the case of alcoholism. Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology, 12, 9-17. Burkitt, I. (2016). Relational agency: Relational sociology, agency and interaction. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 322-339. Buja, I., Sabella, E., Monteduro, A. G., Chiriacò, M. S., De Bellis, L., Luvisi, A., & Maruccio, G. (2021). Advances in plant disease detection and monitoring: From traditional assays to in-field diagnostics. Sensors, 21(6), 2129. Carolan, M. S. (2006). Sustainable agriculture, science and the co-production of ‘expert’ knowledge: The value of interactional expertise. Local environment, 11(4), 421-431. Caulley, D. N. (2008). Making qualitative research reports less boring: The techniques of writing creative nonfiction. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 424-449. Clarke, C. A., & Knights, D. (2018). Practice makes perfect? Skillful performances in veterinary work. Human Relations, 71(10), 1395-1421. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235-296. Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2015). Expertise revisited, part I—Interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54, 113-123. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International. (n.d.) Plantwise-PlantwisePlus. Retrieved June, 26 2023, from https://www.plantwise.org/impact/plantwise/ Creese, J., Byrne, J. P., Conway, E., Barrett, E., Prihodova, L., & Humphries, N. (2021). “We all really need to just take a breath”: Composite narratives of hospital doctors’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2051. Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farming from a process‐relational perspective: Making openings for change visible. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(2), 505-528. Danielsen, S., Centeno, J., López, J., Lezama, L., Varela, G., Castillo, P., ... & Boa, E. (2013). Innovations in plant health services in Nicaragua: From grassroots experiment to a systems approach. Journal of International Development, 25(7), 968-986. Danielsen, S., Mur, R., Kleijn, W., Wan, M., Zhang, Y., Phiri, N., ... & Posthumus, H. (2020). Assessing information sharing from plant clinics in China and Zambia through social network analysis. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 26(3), 269-289. Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547-579. Eden, S. (2008). Being fieldworthy: environmental knowledge practices and the space of the field in forest certification. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(6), 1018-1035. Enticott, G. (2012). The local universality of veterinary expertise and the geography of animal disease. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 75-88. Enticott, G. (2017). Navigating veterinary borderlands:‘Heiferlumps’, epidemiological boundaries and the control of animal disease in New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(2), 153-165. Enticott, G., Donaldson, A., Lowe, P., Power, M., Proctor, A., & Wilkinson, K. (2011). The changing role of veterinary expertise in the food chain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1573), 1955-1965. Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 863-907. Fisher, R. (2013). ‘A gentleman's handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge. Journal of Rural Studies, 31, 13-22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). International Year of Plant Health 2020: Communication guide. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA7186EN Galt, R. E. (2009). " It just goes to kill Ticos": National market regulation and the political ecology of farmers' pesticide use in Costa Rica. Journal of Political Ecology, 16(1), 1-33. Ghiasi, R., Allahyari, M. S., Damalas, C. A., Azizi, J., & Abedi, M. (2017). Crop protection services by Plant Clinics in Iran: An evaluation through rice farmers' satisfaction. Crop Protection, 98, 191-197. Graizbord, D., Rodriguez-Muniz, M., & Baiocchi, G. (2017). Expert for a day: Theory and the tailored craft of ethnography1. Ethnography, 18(3), 322-344. Hinchliffe, S., Bingham, N., Allen, J., & Carter, S. (2016). Pathological lives: Disease, space and biopolitics. UK: John Wiley & Sons. Hobson‐West, P., & Jutel, A. (2020). Animals, veterinarians and the sociology of diagnosis. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(2), 393-406. Höckert, J., & Ljung, M. (2013). Advisory encounters towards a sustainable farm development—Interaction between systems and shared lifeworlds. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 19(3), 291-309. Högman, J., Augustsson, C., & Carlman, P. (2022). To deviate from the expected: A collective story of physical activity among inactive rural children. Sport, Education and Society, 10.1080/13573322.2022.2136154. Kuehne, G., & LLewellyn, R. (2017). The wisdom of farm advisors: Knowing who and knowing why. SSRN, 2897232. Kodandaram, M. H., Saha, S., Rai, A. B., & Naik, P. S. (2013). Compendium on pesticide use in vegetables. IIVR Extension Bulletin, 50, 1-133. Ilbery, B., Maye, D., & Little, R. (2012). Plant disease risk and grower–agronomist perceptions and relationships: An analysis of the UK potato and wheat sectors. Applied Geography, 34, 306-31 Ingram, J. (2008). Agronomist–farmer knowledge encounters: An analysis of knowledge exchange in the context of best management practices in England. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(3), 405-418. Jacobs, J. B. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch'ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78, 237-273. Jeger, M., Beresford, R., Bock, C., Brown, N., Fox, A., Newton, A., ... & Yuen, J. (2021). Global challenges facing plant pathology: multidisciplinary approaches to meet the food security and environmental challenges in the mid-twenty-first century. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 2(1), 1-18. Johnston, O., Wildy, H., & Shand, J. (2021). Student voices that resonate: Constructing composite narratives that represent students’ classroom experiences. Qualitative Research, 14687941211016158. Jutel, A., & Nettleton, S. (2011). Towards a sociology of diagnosis: Reflections and opportunities. Social Science & Medicine, 73(6), 793-800. Jutel, A. (2015). Beyond the sociology of diagnosis. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 841-852. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. Knights, D., & Clarke, C. (2018). Living on the edge? Professional anxieties at work in academia and veterinary practice. Culture and Organization, 24(2), 134-153. Krzywoszynska, A. (2016). What farmers know: experiential knowledge and care in vine growing. Sociologia ruralis, 56(2), 289-310. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2011). Veterinary realities: what is foot and mouth disease?. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(1), 1-16. Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A., & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development, 116, 28-37. McElhinney, Z., & Kennedy, C. (2022). Enhancing the collective, protecting the personal: The valuable role of composite narratives in medical education research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(4), 220-227. McGovern, R. J., & To-Anun, C. (2016). Plant Doctors: A critical need. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 12(7.1), 1177-1195. Nasheeda, A., Abdullah, H. B., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmed, N. B. (2019). Transforming transcripts into stories: A multimethod approach to narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919856797. Nettle, R., Crawford, A., & Brightling, P. (2018). How private-sector farm advisors change their practices: An Australian case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 58, 20-27. Noy, S., & Jabbour, R. (2020). Decision‐Making in Local Context: Expertise, Experience, and the Importance of Neighbours in Farmers’ Insect Pest Management. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(1), 3-19. Proctor, A., Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., & Donaldson, A. (2011). Veterinary field expertise: Using knowledge gained on the job. The Veterinary Record, 169(16), 408. Proctor, A., Donaldson, A., Phillipson, J., & Lowe, P. (2012). Field expertise in rural land management. Environment and Planning A, 44(7), 1696-1711. Rinaldo, R., & Guhin, J. (2022). How and why interviews work: Ethnographic interviews and meso-level public culture. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(1), 34-67. Rodríguez-Dorans, E., & Jacobs, P. (2020). Making narrative portraits: A methodological approach to analysing qualitative data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(6), 611-623. Singleton, V., & Law, J. (2013). Devices as rituals: Notes on enacting resistance. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 259-277. Stein, S., & Luna, J. (2021). Toxic sensorium: Agrochemicals in the African Anthropocene. Environment and Society, 12(1), 87-107. Sutherland, L. A., Mills, J., Ingram, J., Burton, R. J., Dwyer, J., & Blackstock, K. (2013). Considering the source: Commercialisation and trust in agri-environmental information and advisory services in England. Journal of Environmental Management, 118, 96-105. Toepfer, S., Zhang, T., Wang, B., Qiao, Y., Peng, H., Luo, H., ... & Wan, M. (2020). Sustainable pest management through improved advice in agricultural extension. Sustainability, 12(17), 6767. Wang, C. M. (2022). Securing the pig farmgate? Biosecurity, affects and pathological atmospheres. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 1152-1164. Wertz, M. S., Nosek, M., McNiesh, S., & Marlow, E. (2011). The composite first person narrative: Texture, structure, and meaning in writing phenomenological descriptions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 6(2), 5882. Willis, R. (2018). How members of parliament understand and respond to climate change. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 475-491. Willis, R. (2019). The use of composite narratives to present interview findings. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 471-480. Yeh, S. L. (2016). Transformation and tradition in Taiwan’s peasant economy, 1960–2015: A case study of the Dongshi fruit economy. Rural China, 13(2), 306-343. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88838 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在官學界積極推動下，截至2023年中旬已有約百名儲備植物醫師開始駐診工作，提供農民及時且周全的植物健康診斷服務。這是臺灣植物健康史的重要里程碑，然而社會對於這新興專家角色的認識幾乎停留在政策宣傳。為理解植物醫師診斷工作的具體樣貌，以及診斷過程又座落在什麼樣的「植醫—農民」互動關係中，本文深度訪談與田野觀察12名植醫與15名農民，並以聚合式敘事呈現植醫的勞動日常，尤其描述出駐診不同單位的植醫在診斷過程及「植醫—農民」關係的異同；進一步以白話專業知識為徑，釐清植醫取得專業知識的進程，也凸顯出臨床的田野知識、與農民交流的重要。本文強調，植醫若要理解並調節田間問題與農民實務習慣，重要的是得持續創造白話專業知識，也就是長期與駐診地帶的農民們與風土條件互動，密切接觸並往返田野現場與外部各種資源，才得以協商出適用情境又有助益的診斷建議。植醫是沒有商業色彩的「新興專家新鮮人」，這有助於他們與農民的交流，以植醫為例，也反映出農村人情綿密的盤撋特色，以及極端天氣、新農浪潮等產銷環境變化。進一步也為臺灣植醫制度的發展，提供更多的思考與實務建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As of mid-2023, approximately a hundred plant doctors have begun to provide farmers with timely and comprehensive plant care diagnosis services. This marks an important milestone in the history of plant health in Taiwan. However, public understanding of these emerging expert newcomers remains largely confined to policy promotion.
In order to gain a deep understanding of the diagnostic process of plant doctors and their communication with farmers, this study conducted in-depth interviews and field observations with 12 plant doctors and 15 farmers. Using composite narratives, we present the daily routines of plant doctors, with a particular focus on the diagnostic process and the dynamics of "plant doctor-farmer" relationships across different institutions. Furthermore, the process of plant doctors acquiring vernacular expertise was clarified. This involves long-term interaction with the local conditions, the farmers and various external resources, highlighting the importance of field-generated and field-focused knowledge and their interpersonal relationships (puânn-nuá) with farmers. The results offer valuable insights and recommendations for the advancement of the plant doctor policies in Taiwan. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:59:44Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:59:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 ───────────────────────────────Ⅰ
摘要 ───────────────────────────────Ⅱ Abstract ──────────────────────────────Ⅲ 目錄 ─────────────────────────────── Ⅳ 壹、緒論 ───────────────────────────── 1 一、前言 ─────────────────────────── 1 二、植物醫師制度的發展 ──────────────────── 3 三、植醫的診斷工作 ────────────────────── 6 四、農業生產的專業知識與轉譯 ───────────────── 7 貳、田野的實踐與書寫 ─────────────────────── 13 一、研究對象 ───────────────────────── 13 二、考察「關係」的田野技法 ────────────────── 15 三、資料處理 ───────────────────────── 17 （一）聚合式敘事 ───────────────────── 17 （二）合理編織有意義的敘事 ──────────────── 18 叁、植醫的診斷過程：臨床脈絡與儀器檢驗 ────────────── 20 一、聚合式敘事 ──────────────────────── 20 （一）小尹 ──────────────────────── 20 （二）阿質 ──────────────────────── 22 二、討論 ─────────────────────────── 25 （一）當植醫置身田間 ─────────────────── 26 診斷致病的脈絡 ─────────────────── 26 在地尺度的病蟲害監測 ──────────────── 29 找出在地經驗的科學根據 ─────────────── 32 （二）當植醫在實驗室 ─────────────────── 33 三、小結 ─────────────────────────── 35 肆、當植醫與農民打交道：轉譯與盤撋 ──────────────── 37 一、聚合式敘事 ──────────────────────── 37 （一）阿質 ──────────────────────── 37 （二）阿萱 ──────────────────────── 40 （三）小尹 ──────────────────────── 45 二、討論 ─────────────────────────── 46 （一）轉譯的關卡 ───────────────────── 47 （二）植醫—農民的社會關係 ──────────────── 51 三、小結 ─────────────────────────── 55 伍、植醫養成紀：白話專業知識的取得 ──────────────── 57 一、植醫的角色定位 ────────────────────── 57 二、植醫的白話專業知識 ──────────────────── 59 三、專家新鮮人與農民的交流 ────────────────── 62 四、養成植醫的產地 ────────────────────── 66 五、小結 ─────────────────────────── 67 陸、結語 ───────────────────────────── 69 參考書目 ───────────────────────────── 74 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 聚合式敘事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 植物醫師 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 診斷實作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 盤撋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 白話專業知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | vernacular expertise | en |
| dc.subject | diagnostic practice | en |
| dc.subject | plant doctor | en |
| dc.subject | puânn-nuá | en |
| dc.subject | composite narratives | en |
| dc.title | 植物醫師與他們的產地：診斷過程、人情與白話專業知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Becoming Plant Doctors: Diagnostic process, social relationships and vernacular expertise | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王驥懋;簡妤儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chi-Mao Wang;Yu-Ju Chien | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 植物醫師,診斷實作,盤撋,白話專業知識,聚合式敘事, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | plant doctor,diagnostic practice,puânn-nuá,vernacular expertise,composite narratives, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302663 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 3.22 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。