請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88811
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hwong-wen Ma | en |
dc.contributor.author | 駱依琳 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yee-Lynn Low | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:53:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Alfarraj, B. A., Al-Harbi, A. A., Binjuwair, S. A., & Alkhedhair, A. (2022). The Characterization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Using a Modified Bunsen Burner. Journal of Combustion, 1–9.
Avinash, A., Sasikumar, P., & Murugesan, A. (2018). Understanding the interaction among the barriers of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in India- an interpretive structural modeling approach. Renewable Energy, 127, 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.079 Bhandari, R., Trudewind, C. A., & Zapp, P. (2014). Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis – a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 151–163. Bora, R. R., Lei, M., Tester, J. W., Lehmann, J., & You, F. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion Technologies Applied to Poultry Litter with Energy and Nutrient Recovery. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 8(22), 8436–8447. Büsser, S., Frischknecht, R., & Ltd, E. (2008). Life Cycle Inventory of E85, LPG supply in Switzerland and Biogasmix 2008. Cai, D.-L., Yue, X., Hao, B., & Ma, P.-C. (2020). A sustainable poly(vinyl chloride) plasticizer derivated from waste cooking oil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122781 Caldeira, C., Queirós, J., Noshadravan, A., & Freire, F. (2016). Incorporating uncertainty in the life cycle assessment of biodiesel from waste cooking oil addressing different collection systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.005 Chung, Z. L., Tan, Y. H., Chan, Y. S., Kansedo, J., Mubarak, N. M., Ghasemi, M., & Abdullah, M. O. (2019). Life cycle assessment of waste cooking oil for biodiesel production using waste chicken eggshell derived CaO as catalyst via transesterification. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 21, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101317 De Feo, G., Di Domenico, A., Ferrara, C., Abate, S., & Sesti Osseo, L. (2020). Evolution of Waste Cooking Oil Collection in an Area with Long-Standing Waste Management Problems. Sustainability, 12(20), 8578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208578 Dimitriadis, A., Natsios, I., Dimaratos, A., Katsaounis, D., Samaras, Z., Bezergianni, S., & Lehto, K. (2018). Evaluation of a Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) and Effects on Emissions of a Passenger Car Diesel Engine. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 4. Dimple, S.-A., Rean, M., Nazim, M., & Vitra, R.-H. (2017). Potential of used frying oil in paving material: Solution to environmental pollution problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. EPA. (2018). Yearbook of Environmental Protection Statistics 2017. Taipei, Taiwan. Esteban, B., Baquero, G., Puig, R., Riba, J.-R., & Rius, A. (2011). Is it environmentally advantageous to use vegetable oil directly as biofuel instead of converting it to biodiesel? Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(3), 1317–1328. EWABA, & MVaK. (2021). Used cooking oil: One feedstock, different technologies - a comparative study. Fuels of the Future. Fernández-Dacosta, C., Shen, L., Schakel, W., Ramirez, A., & Kramer, G. J. (2019). Potential and challenges of low-carbon energy options: Comparative assessment of alternative fuels for the transport sector. Applied Energy, 236, 590–606. Filho, S. T., Paiva, J. L. de, Franco, H. A., Perez, D. V., & Marques, M. R. da C. (2017). Environmental impacts caused by residual vegetable oil in the soil-plant system. Ciência e Natura, 39(3), 748–757. Fortune Business Insight. (2020). Used Cooking Oil Market Size, Growth Global Report,2028. Fortune Business Insight. Ganesan, K., Sukalingam, K., & Xu, B. (2018). Impact of consumption and cooking manners of vegetable oils on cardiovascular diseases- A critical review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 71, 132–154. Geyer, R. (2020). Chapter 2—Production, use, and fate of synthetic polymers. In T. M. Letcher (Ed.), Plastic Waste and Recycling (pp. 13–32). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817880-5.00002-5 Goding, L., Andersson-Franko, M., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2018). Preferences for bio jet fuel in Sweden: The case of business travel from a city airport. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 29, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2018.06.015 Goh, B. H. H., Chong, C. T., Ge, Y., Ong, H. C., Ng, J.-H., Tian, B., Ashokkumar, V., Lim, S., Seljak, T., & Józsa, V. (2020). Progress in utilisation of waste cooking oil for sustainable biodiesel and biojet fuel production. Energy Conversion and Management, 223, 113296. Gui, M. M., Lee, K. T., & Bhatia, S. (2008). Feasibility of edible oil vs. Non-edible oil vs. Waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock. Energy, 33(11), 1646–1653. Hischier, R., Weidema, B., Althaus, H.-J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Frischknecht, R., Hellweg, S., Humbert, S., Jungbluth, N., Köllner, T., Loerincik, Y., Margni, M., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A., & van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(2), 138–147. IEA. (2018). CO2 Emissions from fuel combustion. IEA, Paris. Imahara, H., Minami, E., Hattori, M., Murakami, H., Matsui, N., & Saka, S. (n.d.). Current Situations and Prospects of Oil / Fat Resources for Biodiesel Production. Retrieved June 14, 2023, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Current-Situations-and-Prospects-of-Oil-Fat-for-Imahara-Minami/32d46aae109728c2489ec1ed7134a9099468ca27 Joosten, L. (1998). Process data descriptions for the production of synthetic organic materials: Input data for the matter study. Semantic Scholar. Joshi, J. R., Bhanderi, K. K., & Patel, J. V. (2023). Waste cooking oil as a promising source for bio lubricants- A review. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 100(1), 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.100820 Julio, A. A. V., Milessi, T. S., Ocampo Batlle, E. A., Silva Lora, E. E., Yepes Maya, D. M., & Escobar Palacio, J. C. (2022). Techno-economic and environmental potential of Renewable Diesel as complementation for diesel and biodiesel in Brazil: A comprehensive review and perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133431. Khandelwal, M., & van Dril, A. W. N. (2020). Decarbonisation options for the Dutch biofuels industry. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Leung, D. Y. C., & Guo, Y. (2006). Transesterification of neat and used frying oil: Optimization for biodiesel production. Fuel Processing Technology, 87(10), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.003 Lin, C. S. K., Pfaltzgraff, L. A., Herrero-Davila, L., Mubofu, E. B., Abderrahim, S., Clark, J. H., Koutinas, A. A., Kopsahelis, N., Stamatelatou, K., Dickson, F., Thankappan, S., Mohamed, Z., Brocklesby, R., & Luque, R. (2013). Food waste as a valuable resource for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Current situation and global perspective. Energy & Environmental Science, 6(2), 426–464. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE23440H Loh, S. K., MAY, C., Cheng, S. F., & NGAN, M. (2006). Recovery and conversion of palm olein-derived used frying oil to methyl esters for biodiesel. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 18, 247–252. Loizides, M. I., Loizidou, X. I., Orthodoxou, D. L., & Petsa, D. (2019). Circular Bioeconomy in Action: Collection and Recycling of Domestic Used Cooking Oil through a Social, Reverse Logistics System. Recycling, 4(2), Article 2. Maddah, H. (2016). Polypropylene as a Promising Plastic: A Review. 2163-1352, 2016, 1–11. Mannu, A., Garroni, S., Ibanez Porras, J., & Mele, A. (2020). Available Technologies and Materials for Waste Cooking Oil Recycling. Processes, 8(3), Article 3. Moretti, C., Junginger, M., & Shen, L. (2020). Environmental life cycle assessment of polypropylene made from used cooking oil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104750. Mustafa Canakci & Jon Van Gerpen. (2003). A Pilot Plant to Produce Biodiesel from High Free Fatty Acid Feedstocks. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 46(4). Nanda, S., Rana, R., Hunter, H. N., Fang, Z., Dalai, A. K., & Kozinski, J. A. (2019). Hydrothermal catalytic processing of waste cooking oil for hydrogen-rich syngas production. Chemical Engineering Science, 195, 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.039 Neste Company. (2019). Borealis partners with Neste to develop routes to renewable polypropylene. Focus on Catalysts, 2019(12), 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focat.2019.11.039 OECD, & FAO. (2015). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2015-2024. Orjuela, A., & Clark, J. (2020). Green chemicals from used cooking oils: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 26, 100369. Ortner, M. E., Müller, W., Schneider, I., & Bockreis, A. (2016). Environmental assessment of three different utilization paths of waste cooking oil from households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.007 Patel, M., Bastioli, C., Marini, L., & Würdinger, E. (2005). Life-cycle Assessment of Bio-based Polymers and Natural Fiber Composites. Journal of Industrial Ecology. PlasticsEurope. (2005). Reformer hydrogen. Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry. PlasticsEurope. (2017). Plastics–the Facts. Report and Data. (2019). Polypropylene market by type, by grade, by molding techniques, by application, by end-users (Automotive, packaging, construction, electrical & electronics, consumer goods, and others), and segment forecasts. Ripa, M., Buonaurio, C., Mellino, S., Fiorentino, G., & Ulgiati, S. (2014). Recycling Waste Cooking Oil into Biodiesel: A Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 10, 347–356. Saleh, H. E. (2008). Effect of variation in LPG composition on emissions and performance in a dual fuel diesel engine. Fuel, 87(13), 3031–3039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.007 Salimbeni, & Andrea. (2015). Transformation of Used Cooking Oil into biodiesel: From waste to resource. The European Biomass Industry Association. Sanli, H., Canakci, M., & Alptekin, E. (2011). Characterization of Waste Frying Oils Obtained from Different Facilities. 479–485. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp11057479 Seber, G., Malina, R., Pearlson, M. N., Olcay, H., Hileman, J. I., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2014). Environmental and economic assessment of producing hydroprocessed jet and diesel fuel from waste oils and tallow. Biomass and Bioenergy, 67, 108–118. Scopus. Shahriar, M. F., & Khanal, A. (2022). The current techno-economic, environmental, policy status and perspectives of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Fuel, 325, 124905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124905 Teixeira, M. R., Nogueira, R., & Nunes, L. M. (2018). Quantitative assessment of the valorisation of used cooking oils in 23 countries. Waste Management, 78, 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.039 Thushari, I., & Babel, S. (2022). Comparative study of the environmental impacts of used cooking oil valorization options in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Management, 310, 114810. Tsai, W.-T. (2019a). Mandatory Recycling of Waste Cooking Oil from Residential and Commercial Sectors in Taiwan. Resources, 8(1), Article 1. Tsai, W.-T. (2019b). Mandatory Recycling of Waste Cooking Oil from Residential and Commercial Sectors in Taiwan. Resources, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010038 Tsai, W.-T., Lin, C.-C., & Yeh, C.-W. (2007). An analysis of biodiesel fuel from waste edible oil in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(5), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.05.005 Tsoutsos, T., Tournaki, S., Gkouskos, Z., Paraíba, O., Giglio, F., García, P. Q., Braga, J., Adrianos, H., & Filice, M. (2019). Quality Characteristics of Biodiesel Produced from Used Cooking Oil in Southern Europe. ChemEngineering, 3(1), Article 1. US EPA, O. (2013, July 30). Vegetable Oils and Animal Fats [Overviews and Factsheets]. https://www.epa.gov/emergency-response/vegetable-oils-and-animal-fats van Grinsven, A. (2020). Used Cooking Oil (UCO) as biofuel feedstock in the EU. CE Delft. Viornery-Portillo, E. A., Bravo-Díaz, B., & Mena-Cervantes, V. Y. (2020). Life cycle assessment and emission analysis of waste cooking oil biodiesel blend and fossil diesel used in a power generator. Fuel, 281, 118739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118739 Yaakob, Z., Mohammad, M., Alherbawi, M., Alam, Z., & Sopian, K. (2013). Overview of the production of biodiesel from Waste cooking oil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.016 Yang, J., & Shan, H. (2021). The willingness of submitting waste cooking oil (WCO) to biofuel companies in China: An evolutionary analysis in catering networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 125331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125331 Yang, R., Tang, W., Dai, R., & Zhang, J. (2018). Contract design in reverse recycling supply chain with waste cooking oil under asymmetric cost information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.329 Zhang, H., Li, L., Zhou, P., Hou, J., & Qiu, Y. (2014). Subsidy modes, waste cooking oil and biofuel: Policy effectiveness and sustainable supply chains in China. Energy Policy, 65, 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.009 Zhang, H., Ozturk, U. A., Zhou, D., Qiu, Y., & Wu, Q. (2015). How to increase the recovery rate for waste cooking oil-to-biofuel conversion: A comparison of recycling modes in China and Japan. Ecological Indicators, 51, 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.045 Zhang, H., Wang, Q., & Mortimer, S. R. (2012). Waste cooking oil as an energy resource: Review of Chinese policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5225–5231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.008 Zhang, W., Ji, H., Song, Y., Ma, S., Xiong, W., Chen, C., Chen, B., & Zhang, X. (2020). Green preparation of branched biolubricant by chemically modifying waste cooking oil with lipase and ionic liquid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122918 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88811 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著人民的生活品質逐漸提高,食品安全也受到重視,加上人類飲食喜好的改變,促使了廢食用油(Waste Cooking Oil, WCO)的產量顯著增加。近年來,隨著技術的進步,人們開始將WCO作為可持續生質原料用於再生燃料和再生材料的生產中,從而最大限度地提高廢棄物的價值,同時解決了處理廢食用油的問題。以可再生原料取代新鮮化石能源的做法被廣泛認為是減少對化石能源開採、應對氣候變化以及緩解有限自然資源耗盡的可行解決方案。
現今的研究主要集中在個別的WCO利用途徑評估上,缺乏對不同途徑的直接比較。本研究旨在通過從生命週期評估 (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA) 評估WCO的兩個不同利用途徑,即燃料化與材料化兩者的環境效益。采用ReCiPe 2016方法得出三個損害類別、十八個影響類別,對兩個選定的可再生產品WCO-氫化植物燃料油 (Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil, HVO) 和WCO-聚丙烯 (Polypropylene, PP) 進行評估。 研究結果表明,NEXBTL過程是WCO-HVO和WCO-PP生命週期中的一個重要的熱點。此外,研究顯示,與其化石燃料替代品相比,所選的兩種可再生產品WCO-HVO和WCO-PP具有較低的環境影響。在人類健康、生態系統和資源稀缺等方面的損害程度上,WCO-HVO分別減少了37.67%、36.35%和91.20%,而WCO-PP分別減少了70.05%、65.31%和89.51%。然而,比較WCO-HVO和W CO-PP,後者被認為更為優選。在人類健康和生態系統方面,WCO-PP較WCO-HVO的減少了分別52.53%及33.33%。但在資源的部分,WCO-HVO 較WCO-PP 減少了52.62%。另一方面,研究結果還顯示,生產WCO-HVO和WCO-PP的整個生命周期中,相對於化石能源替代品,二者分別減少了5.29 %和55.76 %的二氧化碳排放量。 本研究的結果對於未來制定WCO資源政策與采用可持續廢棄物管理系統的決策者具有參考價值。在經濟可行性方面,這兩種利用途徑都有潛力通過銷售再生燃料和材料來產生收入。然而,收集和處理WCO成可用產品也需要成本。因此,決策者在制定WCO資源相關政策時應同時考慮環境和經濟因素。此外,還需要進一步研究其在大規模生產中的經濟可行性和技術可行性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The growing consumption of vegetable oils by humans has resulted in an increase in the production of waste cooking oil (WCO). Instead of treating WCO as waste, recent technological advancements have made it possible to utilize WCO as a sustainable feedstock for the production of biofuels and biomaterials. This approach maximizes the value of biowastes while addressing the problem of disposal. Substituting the use of virgin fossil resources with renewable feedstocks is widely considered a viable solution to reduce the extraction of fossil resources, thereby combating climate change and mitigating the depletion of finite natural resources.
While previous studies have primarily focused on evaluating individual utilization pathways for WCO, there is a lack of direct comparison among different pathways. Consequently, there is a need for a comparison that considers impact categories and assesses the environmental benefits and drawbacks of different utilization pathways. This study aims to evaluate WCO environmental benefits in two different utilization pathways, recovery of energy and material by cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA). Two selected renewable products namely WCO-hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) and WCO-polypropylene (PP) were assessed using the ReCiPe 2016 v.1.06 methodology with three areas of protection at endpoint level and eighteen impact categories at midpoint level. Results indicate that the NEXBTL process is a significant area of concern throughout the entire life cycle of WCO-HVO and WCO-PP. Furthermore, the study shows that both selected renewable products, WCO-HVO and WCO-PP, exhibit lower environmental impacts compared to their fossil-based alternatives. In terms of damage to human health, ecosystems, and resource scarcity, WCO-HVO reduces these impacts by 37.67%, 36.35%, and 91.2% respectively, while WCO-PP reduces them by 70.05%, 65.31%, and 89.51%. However, when comparing WCO-HVO and WCO-PP, the latter is considered preferable. WCO-PP demonstrates greater reduction impact than WCO-HVO in terms of human health (52.53%) and ecosystem (33.33%). But in terms of resource utilization, WCO-HVO reduces the impact by 52.62% compared to WCO-PP. On the contrary, the findings further unveiled that the utilization of equivalent quantities of WCO feedstock for the production of WCO-HVO and WCO-PP throughout their life cycles resulted in significant reductions of CO2 emissions, amounting to 5.29% and 55.76% respectively, in comparison to their fossil-based alternatives. The findings of this study can provide valuable guidance for policymakers when formulating future resource policies for WCO in adopting sustainable waste management systems. In terms of economic feasibility, both utilization paths have potential to generate revenue from selling these renewable fuels and materials. However, there are also costs associated with collecting and processing WCO into usable products. Therefore, policymakers should consider both environmental and economic factors when formulating policies regarding WCO resources. Further research is also needed to explore their economic feasibility and technical feasibility for large-scale production. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:53:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:53:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment i
摘要 ii Abstract iv List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objective of this study 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 WCO in a nutshell 5 2.1.1 WCO and its potential risk 6 2.2 Status of WCO waste management 7 2.2.1 China 8 2.2.2 Japan 9 2.2.3 United State of America 10 2.2.4 Belgium 11 2.2.5 Taiwan 12 2.3 Available Technologies and Utilization for WCO Recovery 15 2.3.1 Recovery of energy 15 2.3.2 Recovery of material 16 2.4 WCO selected renewable products in this study 16 2.4.1 WCO-HVO 16 2.4.2 WCO-PP 18 2.5 LCA in a nutshell 20 2.5.1 Goal and scope definition 20 2.5.2 Inventory analysis 21 2.5.3 Impact assessment 21 2.5.4 Interpretation 22 2.6 LCA of WCO 23 Chapter 3 Methodology 25 3.1 Functional Unit and System Boundary 25 3.2 Life Cycle Inventory Analysis 26 3.2.1 Pre-treatment: Refining and degumming 27 3.2.2 NEXBTL process 28 3.2.3 Steam cracking and Polymerization 29 3.3 Life cycle impact assessment 30 Chapter 4 Result and Discussion 33 4.1 Environmental Impact of HVO from WCO phases: WCO-HVO 33 4.2 Comparison with HVO from WCO and Fossil Diesel: WCO-HVO and fossil diesel 43 4.3 Environmental Impact of Polypropylene from WCO phases: WCO-PP 45 4.4 Comparison with Polypropylene from WCO and Petrochemical based: WCO-PP and fossil PP 55 4.5 A Comparison within WCO renewable product: WCO-HVO and WCO-PP 56 4.6 Discussion 57 4.6.1 Data uncertainty 57 4.6.2 Limitation 58 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestion 60 5.1 Conclusion 60 5.2 Suggestion 61 References 63 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 廢食用油循環經濟策略中燃料化與材料化的環境效益評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Recovery of Energy and Material as Circular Economy Strategies for Waste Cooking Oil | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 闕蓓德;胡憲倫 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Pei-Te Chiueh;Hsien-Lun Hu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 廢食用油,生命週期評估,氫化植物燃料油,聚丙烯, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Waste cooking oil (WCO),Life cycle assessment (LCA),Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO),Polypropylene (PP), | en |
dc.relation.page | 71 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302596 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.37 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。