請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88804完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳惠美 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hui-Mei Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王睿甫 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ruei-Fu Wang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:51:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陳惠美、卓仁豊、盧藝、王睿甫（2022年1月）。馬武督探索森林綠光植物園規劃設計案。國立臺灣大生物資源暨農學院實驗林管理處與國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系（編號：無)，未出版。
Abdul Aziz, N. A., Shian, L. Y., Mokhtar, M. D. M., Raman, T. L., Saikim, F. H., Chen, W., & Nordin, N. M. (2021). Effectiveness of urban green space on undergraduates' stress relief in tropical city: A field experiment in Kuala Lumpur. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 127236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127236 Alyan, E., Combe, T., Awang Rambli, D. R., Sulaiman, S., Merienne, F., & Diyana, N. (2021). The influence of virtual forest walk on physiological and psychological responses. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(21), 11420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111420 Ball, K., Bauman, A., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2001). Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among australian adults. Preventive Medicine, 33(5), 434-440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0912 Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(10), 3947-3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A iiterature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 394-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394 Bialkova, S., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2022). How do design aspects influence the attractiveness of cycling streetscapes: Results of virtual reality experiments in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 162, 315-331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.002 Bielinis, E., Takayama, N., Boiko, S., Omelan, A., & Bielinis, L. (2018). The effect of winter forest bathing on psychological relaxation of young polish adults. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 276-283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.006 Bishop, I. D., & Rohrmann, B. (2003). Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(4), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(03)00070-7 Bishop, I. D., Ye, W. S., & Karadaglis, C. (2001). Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00130-X Boffi, M., Pola, L. G., Fermani, E., Senes, G., Inghilleri, P., Piga, B. E. A., Stancato, G., & Fumagalli, N. (2022). Visual post-occupancy evaluation of a restorative garden using virtual reality photography: Restoration, emotions, and behavior in older and younger people. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 5331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927688 Browning, M. H. E. M., Mimnaugh, K. J., van Riper, C. J., Laurent, H. K., & LaValle, S. M. (2020). Can simulated nature support mental health? Comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667 Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., Fagerheim, K. A., Rydgren, T. L., Brambilla, E., & Thurston, M. (2017). Experiencing nature through immersive virtual environments: Environmental perceptions, physical engagement, and affective responses during a simulated nature walk. Front Psychol, 8, 2321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02321 Carnegie, M. A., Bauman, A., Marshall, A. L., Mohsin, M., Westley-Wise, V., & Booth, M. L. (2002). Perceptions of the physical environment, stage of change for physical activity, and walking among australian adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(2), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609003 Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., & Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221-228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022 Chalmin-Pui, L. S., Roe, J., Griffiths, A., Smyth, N., Heaton, T., Clayden, A., & Cameron, R. (2021). “It made me feel brighter in myself”- The health and well-being impacts of a residential front garden horticultural intervention. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103958 Chan, S. H. M., Qiu, L., Esposito, G., Mai, K. P., Tam, K. P., & Cui, J. (2021). Nature in virtual reality improves mood and reduces stress: Evidence from young adults and senior citizens. Virtual Real, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00604-4 Chen, G., Bowring, J., & Davis, S. (2023). Exploring the terminology, definitions, and forms of post-occupancy evaluation (POE) in landscape architecture. Land, 12(4), 882. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/882 Chen, K.-M., Snyder, M., & Krichbaum, K. (2002). Translation and equivalence: The profile of mood states short form in english and chinese. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(6), 619-624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(01)00068-2 Cheng, X., Liu, J., Liu, H., & Lu, S. (2021). A systematic review of evidence of additional health benefits from forest exposure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212, 104123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104123 Chirico, A., & Gaggioli, A. (2019). When virtual feels real: comparing emotional responses and presence in virtual and natural environments. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 22(3), 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0393 Chung, N., Han, H., & Joun, Y. (2015). Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 588-599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068 Clifford, M. A. (2021). Your guide to forest bathing (expanded Edition): Experience the healing power of nature. Red Wheel/Weiser. Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008018 Danahy, J. W. (2001). Technology for dynamic viewing and peripheral vision in landscape visualization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1), 127-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00131-1 Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1), 267-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4 Daniel, T. C., & Meitner, M. M. (2001). Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0182 Daniel, T. C., & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. Behavior and the natural environment, 39-84. Davis, B. E. (2011). Rooftop hospital gardens for physical therapy: A post-occupancy evaluation. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 14-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671100400303 De Lacy, P., & Shackleton, C. (2017). Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites. Sustainability, 9(9), 1628. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1628 Dobbs, W. C., Fedewa, M. V., MacDonald, H. V., Holmes, C. J., Cicone, Z. S., Plews, D. J., & Esco, M. R. (2019). The accuracy of acquiring heart rate variability from portable devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 49, 417-435. Elsadek, M., Liu, B., Lian, Z., & Xie, J. (2019). The influence of urban roadside trees and their physical environment on stress relief measures: A field experiment in Shanghai. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 42, 51-60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.007 Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/71140 Farkic, J., Isailovic, G., & Taylor, S. (2021). Forest bathing as a mindful tourism practice. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 2(2), 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2021.100028 Farrow, M. R., & Washburn, K. (2019). A review of field experiments on the effect of forest bathing on anxiety and heart rate variability. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 8, 216495611984865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2164956119848654 Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.-K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 82, 48-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004 Finlay, J., Franke, T., McKay, H., & Sims-Gould, J. (2015). Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health & Place, 34, 97-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001 Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566691 Gidlow, C. J., Jones, M. V., Hurst, G., Masterson, D., Clark-Carter, D., Tarvainen, M. P., Smith, G., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.003 Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape ecology, 22(7), 959-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3), 264-275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012 Grove, R., & Prapavessis, H. (1992). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of an abbreviated profile of mood states. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(2), 93-109. Gundersen, V. S., & Frivold, L. H. (2008). Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(4), 241-258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001 Hadjri, K., & Crozier, C. (2009). Post‐occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities, 27(1/2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770910923063 Han, K.-T. (2010). An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: Scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 42(2), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509333875 Hansen-Møller, J., & Oustrup, L. (2004). Emotional, physical/functional and symbolic aspects of an urban forest in denmark to nearby residents. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(S4), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14004080410034065 Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Institutet för bostads-och urbanforskning. Hartig, T., Korpela, K. M., & Evans, G. W. (1996). Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Hernando, D., Roca, S., Sancho, J., Alesanco, Á., & Bailón, R. (2018). Validation of the apple watch for heart rate variability measurements during relax and mental stress in healthy subjects. Sensors, 18(8), 2619. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/8/2619 Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(3), 225-241. Herzog, T. R., Colleen, Maguire, P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5 Hirten, R. P., Danieletto, M., Tomalin, L., Choi, K. H., Zweig, M., Golden, E., Kaur, S., Helmus, D., Biello, A., Pyzik, R., Calcagno, C., Freeman, R., Sands, B. E., Charney, D., Bottinger, E. P., Murrough, J. W., Keefer, L., Suarez-Farinas, M., Nadkarni, G. N., & Fayad, Z. A. (2021). Factors associated with longitudinal psychological and physiological stress in health care workers during the covid-19 pandemic: Observational study using apple watch data. J Med Internet Res, 23(9), e31295. https://doi.org/10.2196/31295 Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., & Jorgensen, A. (2017). All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 109-123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 Itani, O. S., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2021). Light at the end of the tunnel: Visitors' virtual reality (versus in-person) attraction site tour-related behavioral intentions during and post-COVID-19. Tourism Management, 84, 104290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104290 Jette, A. M., Harris, B. A., Sleeper, L., Lachman, M. E., Heislein, D., Giorgetti, M., & Levenson, C. (1996). A home‐based exercise program for nondisabled older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics society, 44(6), 644-649. Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305 Kabisch, N., Püffel, C., Masztalerz, O., Hemmerling, J., & Kraemer, R. (2021). Physiological and psychological effects of visits to different urban green and street environments in older people: A field experiment in a dense inner-city area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 207, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103998 Kalantari, S. (2019). A new method of human response testing to enhance the design process. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1883-1892. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.194 Kamphuis, C. B., van Lenthe, F. J., Giskes, K., Brug, J., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2007). Perceived environmental determinants of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among high and low socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands. Health & Place, 13(2), 493-503. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 Karjalainen, E., & Tyrväinen, L. (2002). Visualization in forest landscape preference research: A finnish perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00244-4 Kil, N., Holland, S. M., Stein, T. V., & Ko, Y. J. (2012). Place attachment as a mediator of the relationship between nature-based recreation benefits and future visit intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(4), 603-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.610508 Kim, M. J., Lee, C.-K., & Jung, T. (2020). Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518818915 King, D. K., Litt, J., Hale, J., Burniece, K. M., & Ross, C. (2015). ‘The park a tree built’: Evaluating how a park development project impacted where people play. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 293-299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.011 Kirillova, K., Fu, X., Lehto, X., & Cai, L. (2014). What makes a destination beautiful? Dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment. Tourism Management, 42, 282-293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.006 Kirillova, K., & Lehto, X. (2016). Aesthetic and restorative qualities of vacation destinations: How are they related? Tourism Analysis, 21(5), 513-527. Kjellgren, A., & Buhrkall, H. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 464-472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.011 Klein, H.-J. (1993). Tracking visitor circulation in museum settings. Environment and Behavior, 25(6), 782-800. Kobayashi, H., Ikei, H., Song, C., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2021). Comparing the impact of forest walking and forest viewing on psychological states. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 57, 126920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126920 Kobayashi, H., Song, C., Ikei, H., Park, B.-J., Lee, J., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2018). Forest walking affects autonomic nervous activity: A population-based study. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00278 Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2010). Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promotion International, 25(2), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daq007 Korpela, K. M., & Ylén, M. P. (2009). Effectiveness of favorite-place prescriptions: A field experiment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 435-438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.022 Kuliga, S. F., Thrash, T., Dalton, R. C., & Hölscher, C. (2015). Virtual reality as an empirical research tool - exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 363-375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.006 Laviola, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344 Lee, J., Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Ohira, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2011). Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health, 125(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.09.005 Lee, J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Takayama, N., Park, B.-J., Li, Q., Song, C., Komatsu, M., Ikei, H., Tyrväinen, L., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2014). Influence of forest therapy on cardiovascular relaxation in young adults. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2014, 834360. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/834360 Li, H., Dong, W., Wang, Z., Chen, N., Wu, J., Wang, G., & Jiang, T. (2021). Effect of a virtual reality-based restorative environment on the emotional and cognitive recovery of individuals with mild-to-moderate anxiety and depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179053 Li, H., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Yang, Z., Liu, H., Cao, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Access to nature via virtual reality: A mini-review. Front Psychol, 12, 725288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725288 Li, P., Froese, T. M., & Brager, G. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review. Building and Environment, 133, 187-202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024 Li, Q., Kobayashi, M., Kumeda, S., Ochiai, T., Miura, T., Kagawa, T., Imai, M., Wang, Z., Otsuka, T., & Kawada, T. (2016). Effects of forest bathing on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters in middle-aged males. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2016, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2587381 Lo, W. H., & Cheng, K. L. B. (2020). Does virtual reality attract visitors? The mediating effect of presence on consumer response in virtual reality tourism advertising. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(4), 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00190-2 Loder, A. (2014). ‘There's a meadow outside my workplace’: A phenomenological exploration of aesthetics and green roofs in Chicago and Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 94-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.008 Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 177-198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5 Lu, S.-Y., Cheng, J. D., & Brooks, K. N. (2001). Managing forests for watershed protection in Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management, 143(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00507-7 Lue, C.-C., Crompton, J. L., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1993). Conceptualization of multi-destination pleasure trips. Annals of tourism research, 20(2), 289-301. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2008). Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-206 Marasco, A., Buonincontri, P., van Niekerk, M., Orlowski, M., & Okumus, F. (2018). Exploring the role of next-generation virtual technologies in destination marketing. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 9, 138-148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.12.002 Mattila, O., Korhonen, A., Pöyry, E., Hauru, K., Holopainen, J., & Parvinen, P. (2020). Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106295 McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712-726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003 McNair, D. M., & Lorr, M. (1964). An analysis of mood in neurotics. J Abnorm Psychol, 69, 620-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040902 McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1992). Profile of mood states: Manual. EdITS. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., Droppleman, L. F., Educational, & Service, I. T. (1971). EITS manual for the profile of mood states. Educational & Industrial Testing Services (EITS). Mealey, L., & Theis, P. (1995). The relationship between mood and preferences among natural landscapes: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(3), 247-256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00035-J Meidenbauer, K. L., Stenfors, C. U. D., Bratman, G. N., Gross, J. J., Schertz, K. E., Choe, K. W., & Berman, M. G. (2020). The affective benefits of nature exposure: What's nature got to do with it? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101498 Meuwese, D., Dijkstra, K., Maas, J., & Koole, S. L. (2021). Beating the blues by viewing Green: depressive symptoms predict greater restoration from stress and negative affect after viewing a nature video. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101594 Millennium ecosystem assessment, M. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island press Washington, DC. Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students' academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41-51. Neill, C., Gerard, J., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2018). Nature contact and mood benefits: Contact duration and mood type. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(6), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1557242 Newman, M., Gatersleben, B., Wyles, K. J., & Ratcliffe, E. (2022). The use of virtual reality in environment experiences and the importance of realism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101733 Nilsson, N. C., Serafin, S., & Nordahl, R. (2016). Walking in place through virtual worlds. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques: 18th International Conference, HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17-22, 2016. Proceedings, Part II 18, Nordh, H., & Østby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.003 Nukarinen, T., Istance, H. O., Rantala, J., Mäkelä, J., Korpela, K., Ronkainen, K., Surakka, V., & Raisamo, R. (2020). Physiological and psychological restoration in matched real and virtual natural environments Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ochiai, H., Ikei, H., Song, C., Kobayashi, M., Miura, T., Kagawa, T., Li, Q., Kumeda, S., Imai, M., & Miyazaki, Y. (2015). Physiological and psychological effects of a forest therapy program on middle-aged females. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(12), 15222-15232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121214984 Othman, N., Mohamed, N., & Ariffin, M. H. (2015). Landscape aesthetic values and visiting performance in natural outdoor environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 330-339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.237 Park, B.-J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Morikawa, T., Kagawa, T., Lee, J., Ikei, H., Song, C., & Miyazaki, Y. (2014). Physiological and psychological effects of walking in stay-in forest therapy. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi (Japanese Journal of Hygiene), 69(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.69.98 Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9 Parsons, R., & Daniel, T. C. (2002). Good looking: In defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00051-8 Patey, R. C., & Evans, R. M. (1979). Identification of scenically preferred forest landscapes. Proceedings of Our National Landscape, 23-25. Reese, G., Kohler, E., & Menzel, C. (2021). Restore or get restored: The effect of control on stress reduction and restoration in virtual nature settings. Sustainability, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041995 Reese, G., Stahlberg, J., & Menzel, C. (2022). Digital shinrin-yoku: Do nature experiences in virtual reality reduce stress and increase well-being as strongly as similar experiences in a physical forest? Virtual Reality, 26(3), 1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00631-9 Riches, S., Azevedo, L., Bird, L., Pisani, S., & Valmaggia, L. (2021). Virtual reality relaxation for the general population: A systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56(10), 1707-1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02110-z Riley, M., Kokkarinen, N., & Pitt, M. (2010). Assessing post occupancy evaluation in higher education facilities. Journal of Facilities Management, 8(3), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961011058839 Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x Schipperijn, J., Ekholm, O., Stigsdotter, U. K., Toftager, M., Bentsen, P., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(3), 130-137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010 Serrell, B. (1997). Paying attention: The duration and allocation of visitors' time in museum exhibitions. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(2), 108-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01292.x Shaw, E., Roper, T., Nilsson, T., Lawson, G., Cobb, S. V. G., & Miller, D. (2019). The heat is on: Exploring user behaviour in a multisensory virtual environment for fire evacuation. Sherman, S. A., Varni, J. W., Ulrich, R. S., & Malcarne, V. L. (2005). Post-occupancy evaluation of healing gardens in a pediatric cancer center. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.013 Sidenius, U., Karlsson Nyed, P., Linn Lygum, V., & K. Stigsdotter, U. (2017). A diagnostic post-occupancy evaluation of the nacadia therapy garden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 882. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/8/882 Simkin, J., Ojala, A., & Tyrväinen, L. (2021). The perceived restorativeness of differently managed forests and its association with forest qualities and individual variables: A field experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 422. Song, C., Joung, D., Ikei, H., Igarashi, M., Aga, M., Park, B.-J., Miwa, M., Takagaki, M., & Miyazaki, Y. (2013). Physiological and psychological effects of walking on young males in urban parks in winter. Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 32(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-6805-32-18 Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Templeman, J. N., Denbrook, P. S., & Sibert, L. E. (1999). Virtual locomotion: Walking in place through virtual environments. Presence, 8(6), 598-617. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566512 Tsunetsugu, Y., Park, B.-J., Ishii, H., Hirano, H., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2007). Physiological effects of shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in an old-growth broadleaf forest in yamagata prefecture, Japan. Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 26(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.135 Turpin‐Brooks, S., & Viccars, G. (2006). The development of robust methods of post occupancy evaluation. Facilities, 24(5/6), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770610665775 Tveit, M. S., Ode Sang, Å., & Hagerhall, C. M. (2018). Scenic beauty: Visual landscape assessment and human landscape perception. Environmental Psychology: an introduction, 45-54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch5 Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005 Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8 Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7 Van den Berg, A. E., & Koole, S. L. (2006). New wilderness in the netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 362-372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006 van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1 van den Bogerd, N., Elliott, L. R., White, M. P., Mishra, H. S., Bell, S., Porter, M., Sydenham, Z., Garrett, J. K., & Fleming, L. E. (2021). Urban blue space renovation and local resident and visitor well-being: A case study from Plymouth, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 215, 104232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104232 van Dijk-Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., Hovinga, D., van Vugt, M., & van den Berg, A. E. (2018). The impact of greening schoolyards on the appreciation, and physical, cognitive and social-emotional well-being of schoolchildren: A prospective intervention study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 15-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.003 Vert, C., Carrasco-Turigas, G., Zijlema, W., Espinosa, A., Cano-Riu, L., Elliott, L. R., Litt, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Gascon, M. (2019). Impact of a riverside accessibility intervention on use, physical activity, and wellbeing: A mixed methods pre-post evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 190, 103611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103611 Wang, R., Jiang, W., & Lu, T. (2021). Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389 Wang, R., Zhao, J., & Meitner, M. J. (2017). Urban woodland understory characteristics in relation to aesthetic and recreational preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 24, 55-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.019 Wang, X., & Rodiek, S. (2019). Older adults’ preference for landscape features along urban park walkways in Nanjing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3808. Wang, X., Rodiek, S., Wu, C., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15, 112-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003 Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, B., & Chiang, Y. (2019). The influence of forest resting environments on stress using virtual reality. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(18), 3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183263 Ward Thompson, C. (2013). Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 79-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.003 Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063. Wener, R. E., McCunn, L. J., & Senick, J. (2016). Did that plan work? Post-occupancy evaluation. Research methods for environmental psychology, 249-269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119162124.ch13 White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: the importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482-493. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., & Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011 Yeo, N. L., White, M. P., Alcock, I., Garside, R., Dean, S. G., Smalley, A. J., & Gatersleben, B. (2020). What is the best way of delivering virtual nature for improving mood? An experimental comparison of high definition TV, 360 degrees video, and computer generated virtual reality. J Environ Psychol, 72, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101500 Yu, C.-P., Lee, H.-Y., Lu, W.-H., Huang, Y.-C., & Browning, M. H. E. M. (2020). Restorative effects of virtual natural settings on middle-aged and elderly adults. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 56, 126863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126863 Yu, C.-P., Lee, H.-Y., & Luo, X.-Y. (2018). The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 35, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.013 Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment. Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning, 157-158. Zimring, C. M., & Reizenstein, J. E. (1980). Post-occupancy evaluation: An overview. Environment and Behavior, 12(4), 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916580124002 Zuckerman, M. (1977). Development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(4), 513-523. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88804 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 前人研究證實景觀美質促進人們在戶外遊憩的停留時間，進而增進身心健康。因此，提升景觀美質成為許多環境設計者的要務。過去環境設計介入之效果，僅能待建成後進行使用後評估方可得知，耗費大量時間與經費成本。如今虛擬實境(Virtual Reality, VR)提供一個環境設計在工程興建前進行虛擬使用前評估的可能。本研究主要應用VR模擬設計環境之使用前評估，比較使用者體驗自然遊憩據點在景觀改造前與後兩種VR之景觀美質感受、使用行為以及身心健康和旅遊意願差異，據此作為設計方案可行性評估研究；同時探討虛擬自然遊憩場景之景觀美質、使用行為、健康效益和旅遊意願的關聯；並驗證VR對於前往實地旅遊意願的促進效果。
臺灣近年森林療癒日益興盛，新竹縣馬武督探索森林為北部重要的遊憩區，2022年本研究團隊接受經營者委託進行園內之綠光森林環境改善設計，配合現有柳杉林，藉由植物解說主題規劃、植栽設計、步道與遊憩設施改善等，提升環境品質。故本研究將此地以電腦軟體建置現況與改造後兩種VR森林模型，受測者配戴VR進行景觀體驗時，可在現實中以原地踏步方式控制於VR模型內自由前進探索或停留觀賞。實驗採隨機平均分配至現況VR組與改造VR組，通過臺灣大學學生網路社團公開招募共72位受測者。過程中以攝影紀錄停留點位置與數量以及總漫遊時長。在VR環境體驗前後，請受測者測量心跳變異，並填寫問卷蒐集個人特性、景觀偏好、知覺恢復、心情狀態、旅遊意願等體驗效益資料。 研究結果顯示，相較於現況VR組，改造VR組的受測者認為景觀美質較高，且停留點較多、整體漫遊時間較長、知覺恢復較高、旅遊意願較高；而景觀偏好越高，受測者在場景中觀賞停留點越多、總漫遊時間也越長，表示景觀美質會影響使用行為；且景觀美質會正向影響心理與知覺恢復，知覺恢復亦會影響旅遊意願；而改造VR組的停留行為集中於經改造置入的主題區內，亦符合設計目標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous research has confirmed that landscape aesthetics promote longer outdoor recreational stays and contribute to physical and mental well-being. Therefore, enhancing landscape aesthetics has become a priority for many environmental designers. In the past, the effectiveness of environmental design interventions could only be assessed after construction, which required significant time and financial resources. However, with the advancements in Virtual Reality (VR) technology, it is now possible to conduct virtual pre-occupancy evaluations of design environments before construction. This study primarily utilizes VR simulations for pre-occupancy evaluation, comparing users' experiences of natural recreational sites in two VR environments: before and after landscape improvement. The study examines differences in perceived landscape aesthetics, user behaviors, physical and mental health, and travel intentions. It aims to evaluate the feasibility of design proposals. Additionally, the study explores the relationships between virtual natural recreational scenes' landscape aesthetics, user behaviors, health benefits, and travel intentions. Furthermore, it validates VR's ability to promote interest in actual site visits.
In recent years, forest therapy has become increasingly popular in Taiwan, with Ma Wu Du Exploration Forest in Hsinchu County being a significant recreational area in the northern region. In 2022, our research team was commissioned to improve the environment in the Green Light Forest within the forest, complementing the existing cypress forest with plant-themed planning, planting design, trail and recreational facility improvements to enhance the overall environmental quality. Using computer software, the team built two VR forest models: the current condition and the post-improvement condition. Participants experienced the landscape through VR, controlling their movements within the virtual model while standing in real space. The experiment randomly assigned 72 participants to either the current VR group or the improvement VR group, recruited through open calls to the National Taiwan University student online community. During the experiment, photographic records were taken to document the locations and number of stopping points as well as the total roaming time. Before and after the VR experience, participants' heart rate variability was measured, and questionnaires were filled out to collect data on personal characteristics, landscape preferences, perceived restoration, mood status, and travel intentions, among other experiential benefits. The results showed that compared to the current VR group, the improvement VR group perceived higher landscape aesthetics, had more stopping points, longer overall roaming times, higher perceived restoration, and higher travel intentions. Participants with higher landscape preferences tended to stay longer at stopping points and have longer overall roaming times, indicating the influence of landscape aesthetics on user behavior. Additionally, higher landscape aesthetics positively affected psychological and perceived restoration, and perceived restoration will also affect travel intentions. The improvement VR group's stopping behavior was focused on the redesigned thematic areas, aligning with the design objectives. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:51:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:51:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 Ⅰ
致謝 II 中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 使用後評估分析 5 第二節 自然景觀改造之效益測量與差異 7 第三節 景觀美質與使用行為和健康效益以及旅遊意願之關係 16 第四節 虛擬實境之漫遊體驗 21 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究架構與假設 26 第二節 馬武督綠光森林景觀設計 26 第三節 綠光森林VR模型製作 33 第四節 研究工具 35 第五節 研究程序與地點 39 第六節 研究參與者 41 第七節 資料分析方法 41 第四章 研究結果 42 第一節 設計介入之使用前評估分析 42 第二節 使用行為與景觀偏好和健康效益以及旅遊意願之迴歸分析 48 第三節 虛擬實境使用感受 51 第五章 結論與建議 53 第一節 結果與討論 53 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 57 中文參考文獻 60 英文參考文獻 60 附錄 75 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 注意力恢復 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 使用評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 參訪意願 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Use evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | Visit intention | en |
| dc.subject | Attention restoration | en |
| dc.subject | Emotion | en |
| dc.title | 以虛擬實境進行使用前評估： 自然景觀設計對體驗效益與使用行為之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Using virtual reality for pre-evaluation: The impact of natural landscape design on experiential benefits and use behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州;鄭佳昆;凃宏明;阮怡凱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yann-Jou Lin;Chia-Kuen Cheng;Hung-Ming Tu;Yi-Kai Juan | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 使用評估,情緒,注意力恢復,參訪意願, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Use evaluation,Emotion,Attention restoration,Visit intention, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302867 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 5.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。