請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88742
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭友晉 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yo-Jin Shiau | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾雅微 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Wei Zeng | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:36:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-04 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abildgaard, L., Ramsing, N. B., & Finster, K. (2004). Characterization of the marine propionate-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfofaba fastidiosa sp nov and reclassification of Desulfomusa hansenii as Desulfofaba hansenii comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 54, 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02820-0
Allen, D. E., Dalal, R. C., Rennenberg, H., Meyer, R. L., Reeves, S., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Spatial and temporal variation of nitrous oxide and methane flux between subtropical mangrove sediments and the atmosphere. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39(2), 622-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.09.013 Alongi, D. M. (2002). Present state and future of the world's mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation, 29(3), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000231 Alongi, D. M. (2014). Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. In C. A. Carlson & S. J. Giovannoni (Eds.), Annual Review of Marine Science,vol 6 (Vol. 6, pp. 195-219). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020 Angel, R., Claus, P., & Conrad, R. (2012). Methanogenic archaea are globally ubiquitous in aerated soils and become active under wet anoxic conditions. ISME Journal, 6(4), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.141 Barnes, J., Ramesh, R., Purvaja, R., Rajkumar, A. N., Kumar, B. S., Krithika, K., Ravichandran, K., Uher, G., & Upstill-Goddard, R. (2006). Tidal dynamics and rainfall control N2O and CH4 emissions from a pristine mangrove creek. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(15), Article L15405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026829 Beaumont, N. J., Jones, L., Garbutt, A., Hansom, J. D., & Toberman, M. (2014). The value of carbon sequestration and storage in coastal habitats. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 137, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.022 Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001). Aspects of bioavailability of mercury for methylation in pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.51-58.2001 Blake, L. I., Tveit, A., Ovreas, L., Head, I. M., & Gray, N. D. (2015). Response of methanogens in Arctic sediments to temperature and methanogenic substrate availability. PLoS ONE, 10(6), Article e0129733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129733 Bridgham, S. D., Cadillo-Quiroz, H., Keller, J. K., & Zhuang, Q. L. (2013). Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Global Change Biology, 19(5), 1325-1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12131 Buckley, D. H., Huangyutitham, V., Hsu, S. F., & Nelson, T. A. (2007). Stable isotope probing with (15)nachieved by disentangling the effects of genome G+C content and isotope enrichment on DNA density. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(10), 3189-3195. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02609-06 Chang, T. C., & Yang, S. S. (2003). Methane emission from wetlands in Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, 37(32), 4551-4558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00588-0 Chauhan, R., Ramanathan, A. L., & Adhya, T. K. (2008). Assessment of methane and nitrous oxide flux from mangroves along eastern coast of India. Geofluids, 8(4), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2008.00227.x Chen, G. C., Tam, N. F. Y., & Ye, Y. (2010). Summer fluxes of atmospheric greenhouse gases N2O, CH4 and CO2 from mangrove soil in south China. Science of The Total Environment, 408(13), 2761-2767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.007 Chen, S. C., Huang, H. H., Lai, M. C., Weng, C. Y., Chiu, H. H., Tang, S. L., Rogozin, D. Y., & Degermendzhy, A. G. (2018). Methanolobus psychrotolerans sp nov., a psychrotolerant methanoarchaeon isolated from a saline meromictic lake in Siberia. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 68(4), 1378-1383. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002685 Chen, Y., Wu, N., Liu, C., Mi, T., Li, J., He, X., Li, S., Sun, Z., & Zhen, Y. (2022). Methanogenesis pathways of methanogens and their responses to substrates and temperature in sediments from the South Yellow Sea. Science of The Total Environment, 815, Article 152645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152645 Chou, M. Q., Lin, W. J., Lin, C. W., Wu, H. H., & Lin, H. J. (2022). Allometric equations may underestimate the contribution of fine roots to mangrove carbon sequestration. Science of The Total Environment, 833, Article 155032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155032 Chuang, D. (2023). 比起空氣捕捉二氧化碳,或許從最大「碳匯」海洋著手更有效率. https://technews.tw/2023/02/20/carbon-capture-from-seawater/ Constance, A., Oehri, J., Bunbury, N., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Pennekamp, F., A'Bear, L., Fleischer-Dogley, F., & Schaepman-Strub, G. (2022). Soil nutrient content and water level variation drive mangrove forest aboveground biomass in the lagoonal ecosystem of Aldabra Atoll. Ecological Indicators, 143, Article 109292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109292 Cozannet, M., Borrel, G., Roussel, E., Moalic, Y., Allioux, M., Sanvoisin, A., Toffin, L., & Alain, K. (2021). New Insights into the ecology and physiology of Methanomassiliicoccales from terrestrial and aquatic environments. Microorganisms, 9(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010030 Cremiere, A., Strauss, H., Sebilo, M., Hong, W. L., Gros, O., Schmidt, S., Tocny, J., Henry, F., Gontharet, S., & Laverman, A. M. (2017). Sulfur diagenesis under rapid accumulation of organic-rich sediments in a marine mangrove from Guadeloupe (French West Indies). Chemical Geology, 454, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.017 Cui, X. W., Liang, J., Lu, W. Z., Chen, H., Liu, F., Lin, G. X., Xu, F. H., Luo, Y. Q., & Lin, G. H. (2018). Stronger ecosystem carbon sequestration potential of mangrove wetlands with respect to terrestrial forests in subtropical China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.019 Cullen, D. W., & Hirsch, P. R. (1998). Simple and rapid method for direct extraction of microbial DNA from soil for PCR. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30(8-9), 983-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00001-7 Dalal, R. C., & Allen, D. E. (2008). Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems. Australian Journal of Botany, 56(5), 369-407. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07128 de Santana, C. O., Spealman, P., Melo, V. M. M., Gresham, D., de Jesus, T. B., & Chinalia, F. A. (2021). Effects of tidal influence on the structure and function of prokaryotic communities in the sediments of a pristine Brazilian mangrove. Biogeosciences, 18(7), 2259-2273. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2259-2021 Doerfert, S. N., Reichlen, M., Iyer, P., Wang, M. Y., & Ferry, J. G. (2009). Methanolobus zinderi sp nov., a methylotrophic methanogen isolated from a deep subsurface coal seam. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59, 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.003772-0 Dumont, M. G., & Murrell, J. C. (2005). Stable isotope probing - linking microbial identity to function. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3(6), 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1162 Dunford, E. A., & Neufeld, J. D. (2010). DNA stable-isotope probing (DNA-SIP). Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE(42). https://doi.org/10.3791/2027 Fabisch, M., Freyer, G., Johnson, C. A., Buchel, G., Akob, D. M., Neu, T. R., & Kusel, K. (2016). Dominance of "Gallionella capsiferriformans' and heavy metal association with Gallionella-like stalks in metal-rich pH 6 mine water discharge. Geobiology, 14(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12162 Ferry, J. G. (1999). Enzymology of one-carbon metabolism in methanogenic pathways. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 23(1), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(98)00029-1 Franzmann, P. D., Liu, Y. T., Balkwill, D. L., Aldrich, H. C., deMacario, E. C., & Boone, D. R. (1997). Methanogenium frigidum sp. nov., a psychrophilic, H2-using methanogen from Ace lake, Antarctica. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 47(4), 1068-1072. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-47-4-1068 Guss, A. M., Kulkarni, G., & Metcalf, W. W. (2009). Differences in hydrogenase gene expression between Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina barkeri. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(8), 2826-2833. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00563-08 Hallam, S. J., Girguis, P. R., Preston, C. M., Richardson, P. M., & DeLong, E. F. (2003). Identification of methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) genes associated with methane-oxidizing archaea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(9), 5483-5491. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.9.5483-5491.2003 Hoj, L., Olsen, R. A., & Torsvik, V. L. (2008). Effects of temperature on the diversity and community structure of known methanogenic groups and other archaea in high Arctic peat. ISME Journal, 2(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.84 Holmes, D. E., Zhou, J. J., Ueki, T., Woodard, T., & Lovley, D. R. (2021). Mechanisms for electron uptake by Methanosarcina acetivorans during direct interspecies electron transfer. Mbio, 12(5), Article e02344-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02344-21 Huergo, L. F., Rissi, D. V., Elias, A. S., Goncalves, M. V., Gernet, M. V., Barreto, F., Dahmer, G. W., Reis, R. A., Pedrosa, F. O., Souza, E. M., Monteiro, R. A., Baura, V. A., Balsanelli, E., & Cruz, L. M. (2018). Influence of ancient anthropogenic activities on the mangrove soil microbiome. Science of The Total Environment, 645, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.094 Imachi, H., Sakai, S., Nagai, H., Yamaguchi, T., & Takai, K. (2009). Methanofollis ethanolicus sp nov., an ethanol-utilizing methanogen isolated from a lotus field. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59, 800-805. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.003731-0 IPCC. (2007). AR4 WGI Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis,Summary for Policymakers. IPCC. (2021). IPCC AR6 WGI The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity Supplementary Material_Chapter07. IPCC. (2022). IPCC AR6 WGIII Climate Change 2022:Mitigation of Climate Change,Summary for Policymakers. Jing, H., Cheung, S., Zhou, Z., Wu, C., Nagarajan, S., & Liu, H. (2016). Spatial variations of the methanogenic communities in the sediments of tropical mangroves. PLoS ONE, 11(9), Article e0161065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161065 Köchl, S., Niederstätter, H., & Parson, W. (2005). DNA extraction and quantitation of forensic samples using the phenol-chloroform method and real-time PCR. Methods in Molecular Biology, 297, 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-867-6:013 Kim, S. Y., Lee, S. H., Freeman, C., Fenner, N., & Kang, H. (2008). Comparative analysis of soil microbial communities and their responses to the short-term drought in bog, fen, and riparian wetlands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40(11), 2874-2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.08.004 Kim, S. Y., Veraart, A. J., Meima-Franke, M., & Bodelier, P. L. E. (2015). Combined effects of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus on CH4 production and denitrification in wetland sediments. Geoderma, 259, 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.015 King, G. M. (1984). Metabolism of trimethylamine,choline,and glycine betaine by sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in marine-sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 48(4), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.48.4.719-725.1984 Konig, H., & Stetter, K. O. (1982). Isolation and characterization of Methanolobus tindarius,sp nov,a coccoid methanogen growing only on methanol and methylamines. Zentralblatt fur bakteriologie mikrobiologie und hygiene i abteilung originale c-allgemeine angewandte und okologische mikrobiologie, 3(4), 478-490. Kudo, Y., Nakajima, T., Miyaki, T., & Oyaizu, H. (1997). Methanogen flora of paddy soils in Japan. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 22(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00354.x Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., & Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547-1549. Lambie, S. C., Kelly, W. J., Leahy, S. C., Li, D., Reilly, K., McAllister, T. A., Valle, E. R., Attwood, G. T., & Altermann, E. (2015). The complete genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanosarcina barkeri CM1. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 10, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0038-5 Lavergne, C., Aguilar-Munoz, P., Calle, N., Thalasso, F., Astorga-Espana, M. S., Sepulveda-Jauregui, A., Martinez-Cruz, K., Gandois, L., Mansilla, A., Chamy, R., Barret, M., & Cabrol, L. (2021). Temperature differently affected methanogenic pathways and microbial communities in sub-antarctic freshwater ecosystems. Environment International, 154, Article 106575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106575 Li, M. Y., Fang, A. Q., Yu, X. L., Zhang, K. K., He, Z. L., Wang, C., Peng, Y. S., Xiao, F. S., Yang, T., Zhang, W., Zheng, X. F., Zhong, Q. P., Liu, X. Y., & Yan, Q. Y. (2021). Microbially-driven sulfur cycling microbial communities in different mangrove sediments. Chemosphere, 273, Article 128597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128597 Li, Q. Q., Wang, F. P., Chen, Z. W., Yin, X. J., & Xiao, X. (2012). Stratified active archaeal communities in the sediments of Jiulong river estuary, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3, Article 311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00311 Li, S. B., Chen, P. H., Huang, J. S., Hsueh, M. L., Hsieh, L. Y., Lee, C. L., & Lin, H. J. (2018). Factors regulating carbon sinks in mangrove ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 24(9), 4195-4210. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14322 Lin, C. W., Kao, Y. C., Chou, M. C., Wu, H. H., Ho, C. W., & Lin, H. J. (2020). Methane emissions from subtropical and tropical mangrove ecosystems in Taiwan. Forests, 11(4), Article 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040470 Lin, C. W., Kao, Y. C., Lin, W. J., Ho, C. W., & Lin, H. J. (2021). Effects of pneumatophore density on methane emissions in mangroves. Forests, 12(3), Article 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030314 Lira-Silva, E., Santiago-Martinez, M. G., Hernandez-Juarez, V., Garcia-Contreras, R., Moreno-Sanchez, R., & Jasso-Chavez, R. (2012). Activation of methanogenesis by cadmium in the marine archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans. PLoS ONE, 7(11), Article e48779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048779 Liu, P. F., Klose, M., & Conrad, R. (2018). Temperature effects on structure and function of the methanogenic microbial communities in two paddy soils and one desert soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 124, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.024 Liu, Y. C., & Whitman, W. B. (2008). Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. In J. Wiegel, R. J. Maier, & M. W. W. Adams (Eds.), Incredible Anaerobes:From Physiology to Genomics to Fuels (Vol. 1125, pp. 171-189). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1419.019 Läuchli, A., & Lüttge, U. (2002). Salinity: environment - plants - molecules. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48155-3 Lovley, D. R. (2003). Cleaning up with genomics: Applying molecular biology to bioremediation. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 1(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro731 Lu, L., & Jia, Z. J. (2013). Urease gene-containing archaea dominate autotrophic ammonia oxidation in two acid soils. Environmental Microbiology, 15(6), 1795-1809. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12071 Lueders, T., Chin, K. J., Conrad, R., & Friedrich, M. (2001). Molecular analyses of methyl-coenzyme M reductase alpha-subunit (mcrA) genes in rice field soil and enrichment cultures reveal the methanogenic phenotype of a novel archaeal lineage. Environmental Microbiology, 3(3), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00179.x Lyimo, T. J., Pol, A., & den Camp, H. (2002). Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in sediments of Mtoni mangrove forest, Tanzania. Ambio, 31(7-8), 614-616. https://doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0614:SRAMIS]2.0.CO;2 Lyimo, T. J., Pol, A., den Camp, H. J. M., Harhangi, H. R., & Vogels, G. D. (2000). Methanosarcina semesiae sp nov., a dimethylsulfide-utilizing methanogen from mangrove sediment. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 50, 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-1-171 Lyimo, T. J., Pol, A., Jetten, M. S. M., & Op den Camp, H. J. M. (2009). Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a mangrove sediment and isolation of a new Methanococcoides strain. Fems Microbiology letters, 291(2), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01464.x Lyu, Z., Shao, N., Akinyemi, T., & Whitman, W. B. (2018). Methanogenesis. Curr Biol, 28(13), R727-r732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.021 Maeder, D. L., Anderson, I., Brettin, T. S., Bruce, D. C., Gilna, P., Han, C. S., Lapidus, A., Metcalf, W. W., Saunders, E., Tapia, R., & Sowers, K. R. (2006). The Methanosarcina barkeri genome: Comparative analysis with Methanosarcina acetivorans and Methanosarcina mazei reveals extensive rearrangement within methanosarcinal genomes. Journal of Bacteriology, 188(22), 7922-7931. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00810-06 Maltby, J., Sommer, S., Dale, A. W., & Treude, T. (2016). Microbial methanogenesis in the sulfate-reducing zone of surface sediments traversing the Peruvian margin. Biogeosciences, 13(1), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-283-2016 Mitterer, R. M. (2010). Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in marine sediments: A new model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 295(3-4), 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.009 Mochimaru, H., Tamaki, H., Hanada, S., Imachi, H., Nakamura, K., Sakata, S., & Kamagata, Y. (2009). Methanolobus profundi sp nov., a methylotrophic methanogen isolated from deep subsurface sediments in a natural gas field. International Journal of Systematic and Eevolutionary Microbiology, 59, 714-718. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.001677-0 Morris, S. A., Radajewski, S., Willison, T. W., & Murrell, J. C. (2002). Identification of the functionally active methanotroph population in a peat soil microcosm by stable-isotope probing. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(3), 1446-1453. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1446-1453.2002 Mountfort, D. O., Asher, R. A., Mays, E. L., & Tiedje, J. M. (1980). Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at delaware inlet, Nelson, New Zealand. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 39(4), 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.39.4.686-694.1980 Muwawa, E. M., Obieze, C. C., Makonde, H. M., Jefwa, J. M., Kahindi, J. H. P., & Khasa, D. P. (2021). 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities in the rhizospheres of selected mangrove species from Mida creek and Gazi bay, Kenya. PLoS ONE, 16(3), Article e0248485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248485 Narihiro, T., Kusada, H., Yoneda, Y., & Tamaki, H. (2016). Draft genome sequences of Methanoculleus horonobensis strain JCM 15517, Methanoculleus thermophilus strain DSM 2373, and Methanofollis ethanolicus strain JCM 15103, hydrogenotrophic methanogens belonging to the family Methanomicrobiaceae. Genome Announcements, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00199-16 Neufeld, J. D., Dumont, M. G., Vohra, J., & Murrell, J. C. (2007). Methodological considerations for the use of stable isotope probing in microbial ecology. Microbial Ecology, 53(3), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9125-x Oremland, R. S., Marsh, L. M., & Polcin, S. (1982). Methane production and simultaneous sulfate reduction in anoxic,salt-marsh sediments. Nature, 296(5853), 143-145. https://doi.org/10.1038/296143a0 Oremland, R. S., & Polcin, S. (1982). Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction-competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44(6), 1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.44.6.1270-1276.1982 Oremland, R. S., & Taylor, B. F. (1978). Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in marine-sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 42(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90133-3 Pan, S. H., Ho, C. W., Lin, C. W., Huang, S. C., & Lin, H. J. (2021). Differential response of macrobenthic abundance and community composition to mangrove vegetation. Forests, 12(10), Article 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101403 Patel, G. B., & Sprott, G. D. (1990). Methanosaeta concilii gen. nov., sp. nov. (“Methanothrix concilii”) and Methanosaeta thermoacetophila nom. rev., comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary microbiology, 40(1), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-40-1-79 Pepe-Ranney, C., Campbell, A. N., Koechli, C. N., Berthrong, S., & Buckley, D. H. (2016). Unearthing the ecology of soil microorganisms using a high resolution DNA-SIP approach to explore cellulose and xylose metabolism in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article 703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00703 Poretsky, R., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Luo, C. W., Tsementzi, D., & Konstantinidis, K. T. (2014). Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. PLoS ONE, 9(4), Article e93827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093827 R_Core_Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/ Radajewski, S., Webster, G., Reay, D. S., Morris, S. A., Ineson, P., Nedwell, D. B., Prosser, J. I., & Murrell, J. C. (2002). Identification of active methylotroph populations in an acidic forest soil by stableisotope probing. Microbiology-sgm, 148, 2331-2342. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-8-2331 Rocheleau, S., Greer, C. W., Lawrence, J. R., Cantin, C., Laramee, L., & Guiot, S. R. (1999). Differentiation of Methanosaeta concilii and Methanosarcina barkeri in anaerobic mesophilic granular sludge by fluorescent in situ hybridization and confocal scanning laser microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(5), 2222-2229. Rossello-Mora, R., & Amann, R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 25(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x Saarnio, S., Winiwarter, W., & Leitao, J. (2009). Methane release from wetlands and watercourses in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 43(7), 1421-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.007 Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., Sahl, J. W., Stres, B., Thallinger, G. G., Van Horn, D. J., & Weber, C. F. (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source,platform-independent,community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 7537-7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09 Shahinpei, A., Amoozegar, M. A., Fazeli, S. A. S., Schumann, P., & Ventosa, A. (2014). Salinispirillum marinum gen. nov., sp nov., a haloalkaliphilic bacterium in the family 'Saccharospirillaceae'. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64, 3610-3615. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.065144-0 Shiau, Y. J., Cai, Y. F., Jia, Z. J., Chen, C. L., & Chiu, C. Y. (2018). Phylogenetically distinct methanotrophs modulate methane oxidation in rice paddies across Taiwan. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 124, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.025 Shiau, Y. J., & Chang, E. H. (2022). Microbial community development in tropical constructed wetland soils in Taiwan. Science of The Total Environment, 812, Article 152563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152563 Shiau, Y. J., & Chiu, C. Y. (2017). Changes in soil biochemical properties in a cedar plantation invaded by Moso Bamboo. Forests, 8(7), Article 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8070222 Steinberg, L. M., & Regan, J. M. (2008). Phylogenetic comparison of the methanogenic communities from an acidic, oligotrophic fen and an anaerobic digester treating municipal wastewater sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(21), 6663-6671. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00553-08 Taketani, R. G., Yoshiura, C. A., Dias, A. C. F., Andreote, F. D., & Tsai, S. M. (2010). Diversity and identification of methanogenic archaea and sulphate-reducing bacteria in sediments from a pristine tropical mangrove. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 97(4), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-010-9422-8 Teske, A., & Sorensen, K. B. (2008). Uncultured archaea in deep marine subsurface sediments: have we caught them all? ISME Journal, 2(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.90 Ticak, T., Hariraju, D., Arcelay, M. B., Arivett, B. A., Fiester, S. E., & Ferguson, D. J. (2015). Isolation and characterization of a tetramethylammonium-degrading Methanococcoides strain and a novel glycine betaine-utilizing Methanolobus strain. Archives of Microbiology, 197(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-1043-6 Tiwari, S., Singh, C., & Singh, J. S. (2020). Wetlands: a major natural source responsible for methane emission. In A. K. Upadhyay, R. Singh, & D. P. Singh (Eds.), Restoration of Wetland Ecosystem: A Trajectory towards A Sustainable Environment (pp. 59-74). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7665-8_5 Van Amstel, A. (2012). Methane. A review. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9, 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2012.694892 Verastegui, Y., Cheng, J., Engel, K., Kolczynski, D., Mortimer, S., Lavigne, J., Montalibet, J., Romantsov, T., Hall, M., McConkey, B. J., Rose, D. R., Tomashek, J. J., Scott, B. R., Charles, T. C., & Neufeld, J. D. (2014). Multisubstrate isotope labeling and metagenomic analysis of active soil bacterial communities. Mbio, 5(4), Article e01157-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01157-14 Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Yao, H. Y. (2020). Optimizing ultracentrifugation conditions for DNA-based stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP). Journal of Microbiological Methods, 173, Article 105938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105938 Watanabe, T., Kimura, M., & Asakawa, S. (2006). Community structure of methanogenic archaea in paddy field soil under double cropping (rice-wheat). Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38(6), 1264-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.020 Wen, X., Yang, S. Z., Horn, F., Winkel, M., Wagner, D., & Liebner, S. (2017). Global biogeographic analysis of methanogenic archaea identifies community-shaping environmental factors of natural environments. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, Article 1339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01339 West, W. E., Coloso, J. J., & Jones, S. E. (2012). Effects of algal and terrestrial carbon on methane production rates and methanogen community structure in a temperate lake sediment. Freshwater Biology, 57(5), 949-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02755.x Wimmler, M. C., Bathmann, J., Peters, R., Jiang, J., Walther, M., Lovelock, C. E., & Berger, U. (2021). Plant-soil feedbacks in mangrove ecosystems: establishing links between empirical and modelling studies. Trees-Structure and Function, 35(5), 1423-1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02182-z Wuebbles, D. J., & Hayhoe, K. (2002). Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Science Reviews, 57(3-4), 177-210, Article Pii s0012-8252(01)00062-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00062-9 Xiao, K. Q., Beulig, F., Kjeldsen, K. U., Jorgensen, B. B., & Risgaard-Petersen, N. (2017). Concurrent methane production and oxidation in surface sediment from Aarhus bay, Denmark. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, Article 1198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01198 Xu, J. B., Jia, Z. J., Lin, X. G., & Feng, Y. Z. (2017a). DNA-based stable isotope probing identifies formate-metabolizing methanogenic archaea in paddy soil. Microbiological Research, 202, 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.05.004 Xu, Y., He, Y., Tang, X. J., Brookes, P. C., & Xu, J. M. (2017b). Reconstruction of microbial community structures as evidences for soil redox coupled reductive dechlorination of PCP in a mangrove soil. Science of The Total Environment, 596, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.073 Yang, C. W., Tsai, L. L., & Chang, B. V. (2018). Anaerobic degradation of sulfamethoxazole in mangrove sediments. Science of The Total Environment, 643, 1446-1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.305 Yarwood, S. A., Baldwin, A. H., Mateu, M. G., & Buyer, J. S. (2016). Archaeal rhizosphere communities differ between the native and invasive lineages of the wetland plant Phragmites australis (common reed) in a Chesapeake bay subestuary. Biological Invasions, 18(9), 2717-2728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1144-z Yarwood, S. A., Bottomley, P. J., & Myrold, D. D. (2010). Soil microbial communities associated with douglas-fir and red alder stands at high- and low-productivity forest sites in oregon, USA. Microbial Ecology, 60(3), 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9675-9 Zeleke, J., Lu, S. L., Wang, J. G., Huang, J. X., Li, B., Ogram, A. V., & Quan, Z. X. (2013). Methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) gene-based investigation of methanogens in the mudflat sediments of Yangtze river estuary, China. Microbial Ecology, 66(2), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0155-2 Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Pan, J., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2020). Spatial and seasonal variation of methanogenic community in a river-bay system in south China. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104(10), 4593-4603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10613-z Zhang, G. S., Tian, J. Q., Jiang, N., Guo, X. P., Wang, Y. F., & Dong, X. Z. (2008). Methanogen community in zoige wetland of tibetan plateau and phenotypic characterization of a dominant uncultured methanogen cluster ZC-I. Environmental Microbiology, 10(7), 1850-1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01606.x Zhang, K., Wang, J. T., Liu, X. L., Fu, X. Y., Luo, H. B., Li, M., Jiang, B., Chen, J., Chen, W., Huang, B., Fan, L. Q., Cheng, L., An, X. C., Chen, F. H., & Zhang, X. H. (2021). Methane emissions and methanogenic community investigation from constructed wetlands in Chengdu city. Urban Climate, 39, Article 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100956 Zheng, S. L., Wang, B. C., Xu, G., & Liu, F. H. (2020). Effects of organic phosphorus on methylotrophic methanogenesis in coastal lagoon sediments with seagrass (Zostera marina) colonization. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article 1770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01770 外交部. (2014a). UNFCCC簡介_巴黎協定. https://subsite.mofa.gov.tw/igo/ 外交部. (2014b). UNFCCC簡介_京都議定書. https://subsite.mofa.gov.tw/igo/ 行政院. (2022). 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. 易淳敏. (2022). 海洋碳匯潛力驚人,用「藍碳策略」降低地球碳排. https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/6699 林幸助. (2019). 108年度紅樹林生態系調查計畫. 柳婉郁. (2022). 綠學院觀點>三分鐘帶你看懂綠碳、藍碳、黃碳. https://greenimpact.cc/zh-TW/article/qvmxm 海保署. (2022). 紅樹林生態系. www.oca.gov.tw/ch/ 陳品潔. (2009). 小濕地vs.碳炸彈 看全球暖化下濕地如何儲碳? 環境資訊中心. https://e-info.org.tw/node/50948 陳昱安. (2016). 從巴黎協議看全球氣候變遷議題走向. 農政與農情, 284. 經濟部淨零辦公室. (2022). 2050淨零排放. https://go-moea.tw/ 農委會林務局. (2016). 自然保育網-棲地保育-自然保留區. https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/reserve 薛美莉. (2011). 台灣西海岸濕地保育概況-台灣紅樹林. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88742 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來極端氣候發生頻率增加,造成許多生態環境的問題,也使氣候變遷議題備受關注,其中造成此現象的主要原因為溫室氣體的排放。根據IPCC統計,在2019年排放最多的溫室氣體為二氧化碳(75 %),其次為甲烷(18 %)及氧化亞氮(4 %),且甲烷作為第二大溫室氣體,在100年的全球變暖潛能(GWP)為二氧化碳的26倍,可知控制甲烷排放量為減緩全球暖化的另一大重點。甲烷主要是由產甲烷菌代謝有機質所形成,又以利用碳源不同,分為氫營養型、醋酸分解型及甲基營養型產甲烷菌,這種產甲烷作用僅發生在厭氧條件下,而濕地便是高甲烷排放的來源之一(約70 %)。同時,濕地不僅是甲烷排放源,也是目前非常重要的碳匯資源,特別是高碳儲存能力的海岸型濕地-紅樹林。因此,本論文為了解甲烷排放多寡是否造成紅樹林生態系統作為碳匯的價值,以北台灣淡水河口紅樹林(八里挖仔尾、竹圍、關渡)作為研究地點,探討其產甲烷活性及土壤中產甲烷菌群組成,並針對利用碳源、現地營養鹽不同,討論其甲烷生成的速率及族群差異。本研究主要會進行土壤物理化學參數的分析以及同位素碳源添加的培養實驗,且以發展成熟的分子生物技術及DNA穩定同位素探測技術(DNA-SIP)來識別土壤中具活性的產甲烷菌,最後進行生物資訊分析及統計分析,來討論紅樹林土壤中產甲烷菌群落組成、產甲烷潛力及與環境因子之間的相關性,並探討DNA-SIP應用於本研究之可行性。研究結果發現3個樣點的環境參數沒有顯著差異,僅在竹圍樣點觀察到偏高的氧化還原電位、鹽度、鉀鈉離子及氯化物濃度,這是由於竹圍樣點的高程偏高,僅在滿潮時會被海水淹沒,使這些海水相關的離子長期積累在土壤中,造成濃度高於其他兩個樣點的現象;而我們添加不同碳源(葡萄糖、H2/CO2、甲醇)進行培養實驗發現,甲醇組具有最高的甲烷產率,為1.86-2.78 µg CH4/g soil/hr,其次是H2/CO2組,為0.05-0.38 µg CH4/g soil/hr,葡萄糖組則沒有產甲烷反應,這也表示在紅樹林土壤中產甲烷菌所利用的碳源以甲醇為主,但在關渡樣點的H2/CO2與葡萄糖組的甲烷產率略高於八里挖仔尾及竹圍,推測此樣點的產甲烷菌群可能不同。從現地的產甲烷菌群落組成來看,功能性基因(mcrA)拷貝數僅1.1×10^5 -2.2×10^5,且土壤中存在多比例的硫循環微生物,表示現地土壤中產甲烷菌偏弱勢,並與硫酸鹽還原菌為競爭關係,而產甲烷菌群主要以未知產甲烷菌群(41 %)及已知產甲烷菌群(59 %)所組成,已知產甲烷菌群又以利用多種碳源的多重營養型(Methanosarcinales)比例最多,氫營養型(Methanobacteriales及Methanomicrobiales)產甲烷菌比例略少,其中Methanolobus與Methanosarcina為3個樣點最優勢的產甲烷菌屬;而經過DNA-SIP後的活性產甲烷菌群組成完全以Methanosarcinales的Methanolobus占主導,在八里挖仔尾及竹圍樣點的Methanolobus約占98 %,關渡樣點則是具有差異,以Methanolobus、Methanosarcina及氫營養型的Methanofollis所組成,顯示紅樹林土壤中具有活性的產甲烷菌以甲基營養型(Methanolobus)為主,而關渡樣點具河口遠且有廢水流經,因此活性產甲烷菌群落組成多元,存在利用不同碳源的產甲烷菌。最後在相關性分析發現活性產甲烷菌(Methanolobus)與鹽度、海水相關參數(K+、Na+、Cl-)呈正相關,與硫酸鹽濃度呈負相關,並且Methanolobus與其他活性菌群呈負相關,表示Methanolobus利用了多數的碳源,大量生長造成其他菌群的生長受抑制,且主要影響紅樹林土壤活性產甲烷菌的環境因子為鹽度及海水中K+、Na+、Cl-濃度。本論文顯示淡水河口紅樹林土壤中產甲烷菌主要利用甲醇作為碳源,現地中存在的產甲烷菌偏少,以多重營養型產甲烷菌為主,且真正具有活性的產甲烷菌以甲基營養型(Methanolobus)為主,並在關渡樣點有較多元的菌群結構,也證實在紅樹林土壤中能與硫酸鹽還原菌競爭的產甲烷菌以甲基營養型為主,且主要影響的因子為鹽度。以此論文作為基礎,未來可以針對全台灣紅樹林的產甲烷菌群落差異或是淡水與鹹水系統之間的差異進一步了解。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the frequency of extreme weather has increased and caused many ecological and environmental problems. It makes the issue of climate change more and more important, among which the main reason for this problem is the emission of greenhouse gases. According to IPCC statistics, the greenhouse gas emitted the most is carbon dioxide(75 %), followed by methane(18 %) and nitrous oxide(4 %) in 2019. The second largest greenhouse gas(CH4) has a global warming potential(GWP) of 26 times that of CO2 in 100 years, it shows that control CH4 emission is very important. CH4 is mainly formed by methanogens metabolize organic matter, and can be divided into hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic and methylotrophic methanogens based on different carbon source. The effect only occurs under anaerobic conditions, and one of high methane emissions source is wetlands. Wetlands are not only a source of methane emissions, but also a important carbon sink, especially coastal wetland-mangrove(with high carbon storage capacity). Therefore, in order to know whether the methane flux cause the value of mangrove as a carbon sink. We choose Danshui Estuary mangrove(Bali-Wazihwei, Zhuwei, Guandu) of northern Taiwan to analyze their methane flux and methanogens composition, also we compare the three site’s methane flux and methanogens compositions difference based on different carbon source and environmental factors. By using molecular biotechnology and DNA stable isotope probing to identify active methanogens in mangrove soil. Finally, we discuss the composition of methanogens community, methane flux and environmental factors’s correlation, and to explore the feasibility of applying DNA-SIP in this study. The result shows that three site’s environmental factors is similar. But high ORP, salinity, potassium, sodium and chloride are observed in Zhuwei, which has high altitude. Due to the altitude so high that seawater can’t entry soil, it causes seawater factors(ex: salinity, sodium, chloride) will accumulate in the soil. Thus, we find the high concentration in Zhuwei. In our incubation experiment, we add different carbon source(glucose, H2/CO2, methanol) to observe CH4 production rate. The result shows that methanol is most highest(1.86-2.78 µg CH4/g soil/hr), H2/CO2 is about 0.05-0.38 µg CH4/g soil/hr, and glucose has no CH4 production. It means that methanogens mainly used methanol as carbon source in our mangrove soil. Also, we observe H2/CO2 and glucose product more CH4 in Guandu than Bali-Wazihwei and Zhuwei, so methanogens composition in Guandu is different. Three sites mcrA genes copies is 1.1×10^5 -2.2×10^5 and our mangrove soil exist sulfur cycle microorganisms, so we can know methanogens is relatively weak and complete with sulfate-reducing bacteria. The methanogens are mainly unknown archaea (41 %) and known methanogens (59 %), and largest proportion of Methanosarcinales utilizing multiple carbon source, small proportion is hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales). The dominant methanogens is Methanolobus and Methanosarcina. After DNA-SIP, we find active methanogens is Methanolobus in Bali-Wazihwei and Zhuwei, about 98 %. While the dominant methanogens is Methanolobus, Methanosarcina and Methanofollis in Guandu, so we can know methylotrophic methanogens(Methanolobus) is the dominant methanogens in mangrove soil and Guandu site is far from the estuary and has wastewater so have different methanogens composition. Finally, Methanolobus is positively correlated with salinity, K+, Na+, Cl-, negatively correlated with sulfate and other active methanogens, so we can know Methanolobus use most methanol and will cause other methanogens grow. In our study, we find methanol is the main carbon source for methanogens in Danshui Estuary mangrove. The mangrove soil’s methanogens is less, and dominant methanogens is Methanolobus, which is methylotrophic methanogens. We also find different methanogens compositions in Guandu. Moreover, this study proves methylotrophic methanogens can complete with sulfate-reducing bacteria in mangrove soil, and the main factor that causes methanogens is salinity. Base on this study, we can further understand the differences in methanogen community of mangrove in Taiwan or the differences between freshwater and saltwater systems. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:36:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:36:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract iii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xii 一、前言 1 1.1、研究背景 1 1.2、研究目的 3 二、文獻回顧 4 2.1、全球氣候變遷 4 2.1.1、氣候變遷成因影響與綱要合約 4 2.1.2、溫室氣體排放 6 2.1.3、甲烷排放 8 2.2、產甲烷作用 10 2.3、產甲烷菌 12 2.3.1、產甲烷菌類型 12 2.3.2、產甲烷菌生態區位 14 2.4、淨零排放與碳匯資源 15 2.4.1、自然碳匯潛力 15 2.4.2、濕地碳匯價值 17 2.5、海岸型濕地 19 2.5.1、全球紅樹林生態系分布與特性 19 2.5.2、台灣紅樹林生態與價值 22 2.6、環境微生物的研究方法 25 2.6.1、分子生物技術 25 2.6.2、穩定同位素探測(Stable-isotope probing;SIP) 26 三、實驗方法 28 3.1、研究地點描述與採樣 29 3.2、培養實驗與土壤理化分析 31 3.2.1、碳源培養實驗 31 3.2.2、同位素標記實驗 32 3.2.3、土壤物理化學分析 33 3.3、DNA萃取 34 3.4、DNA穩定同位素探測 35 3.5、土壤mcrA基因及16S rRNA基因之定量與定序 36 3.5.1、樣品mcrA與16S rRNA基因之即時定量聚合酶連鎖反應 36 3.5.2、mcrA與16S rRNA基因擴增與樣品定序 37 3.6、數據分析 38 四、結果與討論 39 4.1、紅樹林樣點的理化性質及產甲烷潛力 39 4.1.1、紅樹林土壤物理化學性質 39 4.1.2、紅樹林土壤的甲烷生成潛力 41 4.2、紅樹林樣點的現地產甲烷菌群落組成 46 4.2.1、現地的16S rRNA基因與mcrA基因拷貝數 46 4.2.2、現地16S rRNA基因的整體微生物群落結構與物種多樣性指數 48 4.2.3、現地產甲烷菌群落結構與物種多樣性指數 52 4.3、紅樹林土壤活性產甲烷菌群落組成 63 4.3.1、13CH3OH培養的土壤樣品DNA-SIP後mcrA基因浮力密度分層結果 63 4.3.2、培養後樣品重層的活性產甲烷菌群落結構與物種多樣性指數 65 4.4、紅樹林土壤產甲烷菌群落與環境因子之相關性 74 4.4.1、環境因子對現地產甲烷菌群落之影響 74 4.4.2、環境因子對活性產甲烷菌群之影響 78 4.5、紅樹林土壤樣品輕層與重層間活性產甲烷菌群落差異 82 五、結論與建議 86 5.1、本研究之結論 86 5.2、本研究之建議 88 參考文獻 89 附錄 101 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 利用穩定同位素探針技術探討北台灣紅樹林土壤活性產甲烷菌群落結構 | zh_TW |
dc.title | DNA stable isotope probing reveals the compositions of active methanogens in mangrove forests in northern Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林幸助;蔡正偉;羅凱尹;任秀慧 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsing-Jhu Lin;Jheng-Wei Tsai;Kai-Yin Lo;Sau-Wai Yam | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 溫室氣體,海岸型濕地,紅樹林,產甲烷菌,穩定同位素探測,mcrA基因, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Greenhouse gas,Coastal wetland,Mangrove,Methanogen,DNA-SIP,mcrA gene, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302662 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。