Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 國家發展研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88181
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor謝依芸zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorI-Yun Lisa Hsiehen
dc.contributor.author黃瀚陞zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHan-Sheng HUANGen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T16:40:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-08-08-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-06-28-
dc.identifier.citation中國國務院(2020)。〈國務院辦公廳關於印發新能源汽車產業發展規劃(2021—2035年)的通知(國辦發〔2020〕39號)〉。http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-11/02/content_5556716.htm。2022/12/14檢索。
中華民國企業永續發展協會(2021)。〈EV100 2020年報重點摘要〉。https://bcsd.org.tw/spotlight/energy-climate-change/ev100-2020%e5%b9%b4%e5%a0%b1%e9%87%8d%e9%bb%9e%e6%91%98%e8%a6%81/。2022/7/14檢索。
天下雜誌(2018)。〈企業內訓預算每人僅7000元 台大教授:「絕對不夠」〉。讀取於 2022年8月11日, 從 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5087213。2022/7/14檢索。
王銘德、穆衡(2005)。〈汽車客運業路線別成本特性之探討〉。交通部運研所。
付建飛(2008)。 〈交通運輸業外部成本計算方法研究〉,《鐵道運輸與經濟》(30)8:14–16
交通部(2021)。 〈交通部舉辦「2021電動大客車發展成果與展望論壇」,展現電動大客車發展成果,促進智慧電動巴士綠能產業升級〉。https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=14&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202102170003&aplistdn=ou=data,ou=news,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=motc,c=tw&toolsflag=Y&imgfolder=img%2526amp%253B%2526%2523x23%253Bx2f%2526%2523x3b%253Bstandard。2022/12/14檢索。
交通部(2022)。 〈運具電動化社會溝通會議簡報〉。
交通部(2022)。〈車輛數主要資料查詢網頁〉。 https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100&funid=b3301。2022/7/14檢索。
交通部運輸研究所(2011)。〈行車成本調查分析與交通建設計畫經濟效益評估之推廣應用〉。交通部運輸研究所。
交通部運輸研究所(2019)。〈交通建設計畫經濟效益評估手冊〉。交通部運輸研究所。
交通部運輸研究所(2022)。〈規劃2030年電動大客車推動策略與分析示範計畫執行績效〉。交通部運輸研究所。
江佳芸(2019)。《電動車政策與能源政策之環境綜效評估》。臺北:臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,碩士論文。
行政院(2017)。〈空氣污染防制行動方案(紅害減半大作戰)〉。 https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/5638596f-c460-4a12-9e62-d623d34f67d1。2022/12/14檢索。
行政院(2019)。〈推動大學社會責任實踐—在地連結、人才培育〉。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/9fd14ac8-4814-4b69-90e3-726e2641be39。2022/12/14檢索。
余大立、張洪申(2019)。〈純電動與柴油貨車全生命週期能耗及排放分析〉,《環境科學學報》39(6):2043–2052。
吳崇誠(2020)。《電動公車財務評估模式探討》。新竹:國立交通大學管理學院(運輸物流學程)碩士班,碩士論文。
李育明、潘富生(2004)。 〈電動機車推廣政策之檢討—生命週期評估之應用〉,《環境與管理研究》(5)1:1-17。
林明瑞、林盛隆、胡康寧、顏冠忠(2008)。〈就使用成本及環境的觀點進行電動機車與燃油機車之比較研究〉,《環境保護》(31)1:47-65。
邱俊瑋(2022)。《臺灣全電動公車之生命週期永續性評估》。臺北:國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所,碩士論文。
邱瀚民(2012)。《台灣產業環境外部分析以空氣污染物健康衝擊為例》。臺北:國立臺灣大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文。
姜渝生、王小娥、張欣聰(2004)。〈都市運輸計畫經濟效益分析之初探〉,《運輸計畫季刊》33(2):249–276。
胡康寧、林明瑞、林盛隆(2004)。〈以生命週期評估法進行電動機車與燃油機車之比較研究〉,《工業污染防治》(23)1:57-82。
國立臺灣大學校務研究暨社會責任辦公室(2020)。〈本校發布首本《社會責任報告書》擘劃「實踐永續,驅動未來」的永續藍圖〉。https://oir.ntu.edu.tw/ntuir/%e8%87%ba%e7%81%a3%e5%a4%a7%e5%ad%b8%e7%ac%ac%e4%b8%80%e6%9c%ac%e3%80%8a%e7%a4%be%e6%9c%83%e8%b2%ac%e4%bb%bb%e5%a0%b1%e5%91%8a%e6%9b%b8%e3%80%8b%e3%80%80%e6%93%98%e5%8a%83%e3%80%8c%e5%af%a6%e8%b8%90/。2022/7/14檢索。
國家發展委員會(2022)。〈臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明〉。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDc2Mi80NGIzM2YxMC1lZjQ2LTRmNjctYmM4OC02OTUxNjkwNGE4NWYucGRm&n=6Ie654GjMjA1MOa3qOmbtuaOkuaUvui3r%2bW%2bkeWPiuetlueVpee4veiqquaYjl%2fnsKHloLEucGRm&icon=。2022/7/14檢索。
張仲誼(2022)。《電動公車與柴油公車成本與經濟特性之研究》。臺北:臺灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文。
張佳芬(2018)。《大學社會責任實踐-以產學研鏈結價創計畫為案例做探討》。臺中:國立中興大學科技管理研究所,碩士論文。
張金淑(2006)。〈永續校園的推動與展望〉,《學校行政》(44):66-84。
張朝能、黃國修、張學孔(2016)。〈公路公共運輸電動客車經營與運作績效調查〉。交通部運輸研究所。
教育部(2022)。〈永續校園資訊網〉。https://www.esdtaiwan.edu.tw/ESDintro.asp#。2022/12/14檢索。
郭博堯 等(2016)。〈臺灣地區車輛生命週期評估〉。中華經濟研究院。
郭瑜堅(2007)。《旅次總成本導向之都市運輸政策評估方法》。臺北:臺灣大學土木工程研究所,博士論文。
陳品潔(2012)。《電動公車之效益評估》。臺北:臺灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文。
陳柏君、林幸加、溫蓓章 等(2022)。 〈我國電動大客車推動策略規劃與自動輔助駕駛技術導入初探〉。交通部運輸研究所。
陳國岳、吳東淩、張益城(2019)。〈電動大客車推動策略初探〉,交通部運輸研究所。
陳榮明(2013)。 〈電動公車引進的評估〉。《臺北市議會公報》,第 97 卷,第三期,第1120-1122頁。
曾暐畯、陳厚銓、張綜桁、張天昱、謝依芸(2022)。〈臺灣電力碳密集度現況研究與淨零政策之展望〉,《臺灣能源期刊》(9)4:307-321。
黃子瞻(2015)。《台灣電動公車之成本函數與營運特性分析》。臺北:臺灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文。
黃新薰 等(2012)。〈從生命週期觀點探討國內私人小客車之能源消耗與溫室氣體排放之研究〉。交通部運輸研究所。
溫蓓章 等(2017)。《國際電動大客車產業發展與政策研析》。經濟部工業局106年度專案計畫期末研究報告。
經濟部工業局(2016)。〈智慧電動車產業輔導推廣計畫結案報告〉。
經濟部工業局(2021)。〈電動車輛產業網〉。https://www.lev.org.tw/subsidy/default.aspx。2022/12/14檢索。
經濟部能源局(2020)。〈能源轉型白皮書〉。
臺大風險中心(2021)。〈台灣行不行——各國電動車政策大評比〉。https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/en-trans/open-energy/1632-1109-open.html
臺灣大學永續辦公室(2021)。〈臺灣大學社會責任與永續治理行動計畫〉。臺灣大學。
趙清成、包佳元(2011)。〈機場噪音與禁限建管制對都市發展外部成本之影響:以高雄國際機場為例〉,《都市與計劃》38(3):245–277。
黎土煜、餘大立、張洪申(2017)。〈基於GREET的純電動公交車與傳統公車全生命週期評估〉,《環境科學研究》30(10):1653–1660。
賴文泰(2017)。〈電動公車營運指標、財務效益分析與發展策略之研究〉,《運輸計畫季刊》46(4):377–398。
環保署(2021)。〈運輸部門 | 氣候公民對話平臺 氣候公民對話平臺〉。https://www.climatetalks.tw/blank-14。2022/7/14檢索。
Accountability (2022). "AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard." https://www.accountability.org/static/940dc017198458fed647f73ad5d47a95/aa1000ses_2015.pdf. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Ali, M., Mustapha, I., Osman, S., & Hassan, U. (2021). “University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 286: 124931.
Alimujiang, A., & Jiang, P. (2020). “Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles—A case of Shanghai.” Energy for Sustainable Development, 55: 181–189.
Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). “An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16): 1777–1785.
American Automobile Association (2020). "Your Driving Costs 2020 Fact Sheet." https://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Your-Driving-Costs-2020-Fact-Sheet-FINAL-12-9-20-2.pdf. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Argonne National Laboratory (2022). "Argonne GREET Model." https://greet.es.anl.gov/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bentzen, J. B. (2011). "A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Electric Vehicle." https://socialvalueuk.org/reports/a-social-cost-benefit-analysis-of-an-electric-vehicle/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Berckmans, G., Messagie, M., Smekens, J., Omar, N., Vanhaverbeke, L., & Joeri Van Mierlo. (2017). “Cost Projection of State of the Art Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Up to 2030.” Energies, 10(9): 1314.
Bloomberg (2018). "Electric Buses in Cities: Driving Towards Cleaner Air and Lower CO2." https://about.bnef.com/blog/electric-buses-cities-driving-towards-cleaner-air-lower-co2/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Calthrop, E., & Proost, S. (1998). “Road Transport Externalities.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3): 335.
Chang, C.-C., Liao, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-W. (2019a). “Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Public Transportation—A Case Study of Bus Route NO. 2 in Tainan City, Taiwan.” Procedia Manufacturing, 30: 388–395.
Chang, C.-C., Liao, Y.-T., & Chang, Y.-W. (2019b). “Life cycle assessment of alternative energy types – including hydrogen – for public city buses in Taiwan.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(33): 18472–18482.
Chester, M., & Horvath, A. (2009). "Life-cycle Energy and Emissions Inventories for Motorcycles, Diesel Automobiles, School Buses, Electric Buses, Chicago Rail, and New York City Rail." https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6z37f2jr. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Chris Harto (2020). "EV Ownership Cost: Today’s Electric Vehilces Offer Big Savings for Consumers." Cosumer Reports. https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/EV-Ownership-Cost-Final-Report-1.pdf. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Christofa, Chhan, & Pollitt. (2017). "Zero-Emission Transit Bus and Refueling Technologies and Deployment Status."
Coase, R. H. (1960). "The Problem of Social Cost." The Journal of Law & Economics 3: 1–44.
Delucchi, Mark & McCubbin, Donald. (2010). "External Costs of Transport in the U.S." Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series.
Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). “What Impact? A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance.” California Management Review, 56(3): 118–141.
EIA (2021). "International Energy Outlook 2021." Website address not provided. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Electric Vehicles Initiative | Clean Energy Ministerial (2022). "Electric Vehicles Initiative." https://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/initiatives-campaigns/electric-vehicles-initiative/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Elfalan, J. (2022). "The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car | Edmunds." https://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/the-true-cost-of-powering-an-electric-car.html. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Forbes (2022). "23% Fuel Duty Hike Starts March 2023 But Not Mentioned In U.K. Chancellor’s Autumn Statement." Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2022/11/17/23-fuel-duty-hike-starts-march-2023-but-not-mentioned-in-uk-chancellors-autumn-statement/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Frischknecht, Rolf & Flury, Karin. (2011). "Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: Answers and challenges - Zurich, April 6, 2011." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16: 691-695.
Global Electric Mobility Programme | UNEP - UN Environment Programme (2021). "Global Electric Mobility Programme." https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/transport/what-we-do/global-electric-mobility-programme. Retrieval Date: 2022/05/27.
Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D., & Schuemer, R. (2017). “WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12): Art. 12.
Han, L., Sun, Z., He, J., Hao, Y., Tang, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, C., & Miao, S. (2020). “Seasonal variation in health impacts associated with visibility in Beijing, China.” Science of The Total Environment, 730: 139149.
Harvard University (2006). "Sustainability at Harvard." https://green.harvard.edu/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Higher Education Sustainability Initiative | Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2012). "Higher Education Sustainability Initiative." https://sdgs.un.org/HESI. Retrieval Date: 2022/07/14.
Hsieh, I.-Y. L., Pan, M. S., Chiang, Y.-M., & Green, W. H. (2019). “Learning only buys you so much: Practical limits on battery price reduction.” Applied Energy, 239: 218–224.
ICCT. (2021). "Decarbonizing bus fleets: Global overview of targets for phasing out combustion engine vehicles." International Council on Clean Transportation.
IEA (2022). "World Energy Outlook 2021 – Analysis." https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Jacquet, Jeffrey. (2014). "A Short History of Social Impact Assessment."
Kolstad, C. D. (2010). Environmental Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, D.-Y., Elgowainy, A., Kotz, A., Vijayagopal, R., & Marcinkoski, J. (2018). “Life-cycle implications of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle technology for medium- and heavy-duty trucks.” Journal of Power Sources, 393: 217–229.
Litman, T. A. (2009). "Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis Techniques, Estimates and Implications Second Edition." Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Liu, W.-H. (2022). “University social responsibility to promote coastal partnership: Introducing Taiwan coastal communities.” Marine Policy 146.
Liu, Z., Song, J., Kubal, J., Susarla, N., Knehr, K. W., Islam, E., Nelson, P., & Ahmed, S. (2021). “Comparing total cost of ownership of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles.” Energy Policy 158.
Maclean, H., & Lave, L. (2004). “Life Cycle Assessment of Automobile/Fuel Options.” Environmental science & technology 37(23): 5445–5452.
Masiero, L., & Maggi, R. (2012). “Estimation of indirect cost and evaluation of protective measures for infrastructure vulnerability: A case study on the transalpine transport corridor.” Transport Policy 20.
McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. (2010). “Developments in Practice XXXVII: Total Cost of Ownership.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 27(1).
Miedema, H. M., & Oudshoorn, C. G. (2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals.” Environmental Health Perspectives 109(4): 409.
Moon, S., Lee, Y.-J., & Lee, D.-J. (2022). “A cost-effectiveness analysis of fuel cell electric vehicles considering infrastructure costs and greenhouse gas emissions: An empirical case study in Korea.” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 54
Morioka, T., Fujita, T., & Yoshida, N. (1996). “Performance and shortcomings of typical environmental pollution control programs for automobile traffic in Kobe city and surrounding areas. Social cost evaluation of noise pollution by hedonic price method.” Science of The Total Environment 189–190: 99–105.
MuijenHeidi, H. S. C. A. (2004). “Corporate Social Responsibility Starts at University.” Journal of Business Ethics 53(1): 235–246.
Muller, N. Z., & Mendelsohn, R. (2007). “Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(1): 1–14.
Nelson, J. P. (2008). “Hedonic Property Value Studies of Transportation Noise: Aircraft and Road Traffic.” Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets: 57–82.
Nijkamp, P., & Blaas, E. (1994). Impact Assessment and Evaluation in Transportation Planning. Springer Netherlands.
Noll, B., del Val, S., Schmidt, T. S., & Steffen, B. (2022). “Analyzing the competitiveness of low-carbon drive-technologies in road-freight: A total cost of ownership analysis in Europe.” Applied Energy 306
Nordelöf, A., Romare, M., & Tivander, J. (2019). “Life cycle assessment of city buses powered by electricity, hydrogenated vegetable oil or diesel.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 75: 211–222.
Palmer, K., Tate, J. E., Wadud, Z., & Nellthorp, J. (2018). “Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan.” Applied Energy 209: 108–119.
Pathak, A., & Subedi, T. R. (2021). “Analysis of total cost of ownership and cost competitiveness of privately-owned electric vehicles in Nepal.” Journal of Innovations in Engineering Education 4(2): 16–31.
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan London.
Plantan, Jr., F. (2002). "European sites study: Universities as sites of citizenship and social responsibility."
Prassas, E. S. (2013). Engineering Economics and Finance for Transportation Infrastructure (1st edition). Heidelberg: Springer.
Samet, J., & Krewski, D. (2007). “Health effects associated with exposure to ambient air pollution.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A 70(3–4): 227–242.
Santos, G., Marques, C. S., Justino, E., & Mendes, L. (2020). “Understanding social responsibility’s influence on service quality and student satisfaction in higher education.” Journal of Cleaner Production 256.
Shafique, M., & Luo, X. (2022). “Environmental life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles from the current and future energy mix perspective.” Journal of Environmental Management 303.
Solomon, S., & Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suttakul, P., Wongsapai, W., Fongsamootr, T., Mona, Y., & Poolsawat, K. (2022). “Total cost of ownership of internal combustion engine and electric vehicles: A real-world comparison for the case of Thailand.” Energy Reports 8: 545–553.
Tan, X., Mu, Z., Wang, S., Zhuang, H., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., & Gu, B. (2011). “Study on whole-life cycle automotive manufacturing industry CO2 emission accounting method and Application in Chongqing.” Procedia Environmental Sciences 5: 167–172.
Tsai, C. Y., Chang, T. H., & Hsieh, I. Y. L. (2023). "Evaluating vehicle fleet electrification against net-zero targets in scooter-dominated road transport." Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 114.
ULSF (1990). "Talloires Declaration – ULSF." http://ulsf.org/talloires-declaration/. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
United Nations (1972). "United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm 1972." https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
United Nations (2012). "Higher Education Sustainability Initiative." https://sdgs.un.org/HESI. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Universitas Indonesia (2010). "UI GreenMetric." https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1efasHG5crGdsMjP112AKsyL_gNfoZDI4. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
US EPA, O. (2015). "Learn About Volkswagen Violations." https://www.epa.gov/vw/learn-about-volkswagen-violations. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Van Kempen, E., Casas, M., Pershagen, G., & Foraster, M. (2018). “WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(2).
Vanclay, F. (2003). “International Principles For Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(1): 5–12.
Vanclay, F., Esteves, A., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. (2015). "Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects."
Velandia Vargas, J. E., Falco, D. G., da Silva Walter, A. C., Cavaliero, C. K. N., & Seabra, J. E. A. (2019). “Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles and buses in Brazil: Effects of local manufacturing, mass reduction, and energy consumption evolution.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24(10): 1878–1897.
W. Kulyk. (2012). "Advanced Bus Concepts: Perspectives from FTA Programs." Federal Transit Administration.
Wang, Z., Wei, W., & Zheng, F. (2020). “Effects of industrial air pollution on the technical efficiency of agricultural production: Evidence from China.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 83.
WHO (2011). "Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe." https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326424. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
WHO (2022). "Air pollution." https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution. Retrieval Date: 2022/11/20.
Williams, K. J. H., & Schirmer, J. (2012). “Understanding the relationship between social change and its impacts: The experience of rural land use change in south-eastern Australia.” Journal of Rural Studies 28(4): 538–548.
Zhao, E., Walker, P. D., & Surawski, N. C. (2022). “Emissions life cycle assessment of diesel, hybrid and electric buses.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 236(6): 1233–1245.
Zhu, B., & Dewancker, B. (2021). “A case study on the suitability of STARS for green campus in China.” Evaluation and Program Planning 84.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88181-
dc.description.abstract在氣候變遷與永續發展的趨勢下,除了國家與企業先後響應與簽署各項永續倡議和協議,並提出淨零期程與目標外,各國大學也作為行動者紛紛加入減碳行列發揮影響力,肩負起「大學社會責任」(University Social Responsibility)。2020年6月臺灣大學發布首本《大學社會責任報告書》,也宣示將在2048年達成碳中和的目標;其中的「交通車與公務車電動化」為交通議題中的重要一環。在巨大的轉型挑戰目標下,我們需重新審視目前仰賴化石燃料的運作模式、評估其對環境與社會造成的外部成本,並透過估算電動模式下的效益與成本,進而量化轉型下可能創造之價值。
本研究分別針對傳統燃油車與電動車,以經濟、環境與社會層面分析在臺大此個案條件下,校園交通車與公務車電動化的潛在優劣。經濟層面評估採取總擁有成本(Total Cost of Ownership, TCO)法,以計算校方擁有燃油車與電動車的生命週期成本,並進行敏感性分析。環境層面的評估則是透過美國阿貢國家實驗室開發的GREET模型之參數在地化,評估燃油車與電動車在生命週期階段對環境的影響。社會層面的評估以量化方法計算電動車減少的噪音汙染損害,並以質化分析探討大學作為減碳的行動者,運具轉型為其利害關係人所帶來的效益與成本。
研究結果顯示,電動車現階段與燃油車相比不具成本優勢,需仰賴技術進步使電池成本持續下降以及政策補貼,擁有電動車的總成本才能低於燃油車,進而激勵組織與消費者汰換燃油車。由於個案的特殊情境(部分車種年行駛里程較短),儘管大部分車種電動車在全生命週期所消耗的能源與溫室氣體排放較燃油稍少,但其車輛製造階段的氧化硫排放量卻遠大於燃油車,進而造成電動車每公里產生的空汙外部成本為燃油車之2-3倍。社會層面部分,機車電動化可以獲得最大的節省噪音效益,每公里可減少約96%的噪音汙染成本。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUniversities across the globe are increasingly recognizing their responsibilities to contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. In June 2020, National Taiwan University released its first University Social Responsibility Report, detailing all the campus-wide efforts on sustainable developments—including its commitment to carbon neutrality by 2048. Vehicle electrification is believed to be an important action to achieve the climate goal. Huge impacts and uncertainties are anticipated during the transition to electric mobility on campus.
It is of timely importance to have an evaluation framework for exploring the potential tradeoffs between environmental and economic aspects involved in the near-term evolution. In the economic aspect, the total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis results highlight the importance of government subsidies and lower battery costs for electric fleets to achieve TCO parity with their fuel-powered counterparts. In the environmental aspect, the life-cycle assessment (LCA), derived from the GREET-Taiwan model, suggests that while fleet electrification could reduce life-cycle energy use and carbon emissions, it will create much more sulfur oxide (SOx) emissions on the basis of per km—owing to the low vehicle use intensity of university fleets. In the social aspect, the electrification of motorcycles can achieve the greatest noise pollution benefits, and reduce the cost of noise pollution by about 96% per kilometer.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:40:02Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:40:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目 錄 iv
圖 目 錄 vii
表 目 錄 ix
第一章 前言 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究方法與流程 2
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1電動運具發展與政策 5
2.1.1國際電動車趨勢 5
2.1.2各國電動大客車政策 7
2.1.3臺灣電動車政策 10
2.1.4臺灣電動大客車政策 12
2.2運具電動化成本模式分析 14
2.2.1運輸成本結構 14
2.2.2車輛成本模式分析 15
2.3運輸與外部性 19
2.3.1外部性理論 19
2.3.2 運輸外部成本 20
2.3.3運輸環境污染成本 22
2.3.4噪音汙染成本 24
2.4各層面成本評估方法 25
2.4.1 總擁有成本法 25
2.4.2 生命週期評估 27
2.4.3 社會影響評估 29
2.5永續校園與大學社會責任 30
2.5.1永續校園定義與起源 30
2.5.2國內政策推動 32
2.5.3 大學社會責任 33
2.5.4臺大「永續校園治理計畫」 35
2.6 文獻評析 36
第三章 研究方法 38
3.1模式基本假設 38
3.2成本模式構建 38
3.2.1經濟成本效益 38
3.2.2環境成本效益 42
3.2.3社會成本效益 43
第四章 個案分析 45
4.1臺大交通車現況概述 45
4.2臺大公務車現況概述 47
4.3電動化轉型執行缺口 48
4.3.1車輛使用情形盤點調查 48
4.3.2政策管理措施與預算限制 49
4.3.3蒐集市售電動車輛規格 49
4.4車輛規格參數蒐集 49
4.5 電動與燃油車輛各項成本 53
第五章 參數模擬結果 64
5.1經濟成本與效益 64
5.1.1總擁有成本比較 64
5.1.2敏感性分析 69
5.2 環境成本與效益 74
5.2.1 GREET模型結果 74
5.2.2 空氣污染成本與效益 82
5.3 社會面成本與效益 88
5.3.1 噪音污染成本與效益 88
5.3.2 對利害關係人之影響評估 89
5.4 2050年淨零情境分析 91
5.4.1 情境定義 91
5.4.2情境研究結果 92
第六章 結論與建議 96
6.1 結論 96
6.2 研究限制與建議 98
參考文獻 100
附錄 110
GREET模型的在地化參數 110
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject大學社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject生命週期評估zh_TW
dc.subject總擁有成本zh_TW
dc.subject電動車zh_TW
dc.subject碳中和zh_TW
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten
dc.subjectUniversity social responsibilityen
dc.subjectElectric vehicleen
dc.subjectTotal cost of ownershipen
dc.subjectCarbon Neutralityen
dc.title校園交通車與公務車電動化效益分析—以臺灣大學為例zh_TW
dc.titleBenefit Analysis of University Fleet Electrification – A Case Study of National Taiwan Universityen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor施世駿zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorShih Jiunn Shien
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張學孔;謝宜桓zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShyue Koong Jason Chang;Yi-Huan Hsiehen
dc.subject.keyword電動車,總擁有成本,生命週期評估,碳中和,大學社會責任,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordElectric vehicle,Total cost of ownership,Life cycle assessment,Carbon Neutrality,University social responsibility,en
dc.relation.page111-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202301207-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2023-06-29-
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept國家發展研究所-
顯示於系所單位:國家發展研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.17 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved