請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88173完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭銘傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jason Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江昀曄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun-Yeh Chiang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T16:37:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is Polarization a Myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for Realists. In Democracy for Realists. Princeton University Press. Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. Allen, J. D., Mohllajee, A. P., Shelton, R. C., Othus, M. K., Fontenot, H. B., & Hanna, R. (2009). Stage of adoption of the human papillomavirus vaccine among college women. Preventive Medicine, 48(5), 420–425. Argote, P., Barham, E., Daly, S. Z., Gerez, J. E., Marshall, J., & Pocasangre, O. (2021). The shot, the message, and the messenger: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Latin America. NPJ vaccines, 6(1), 118. Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology, 3(1), 27–52. Blair, R. A., Morse, B. S., & Tsai, L. L. (2017). Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 89–97. Bokemper, S. E., Huber, G. A., Gerber, A. S., James, E. K., & Omer, S. B. (2021). Timing of COVID-19 vaccine approval and endorsement by public figures. Vaccine, 39(5), 825–829. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons. Callaghan, T., Moghtaderi, A., Lueck, J. A., Hotez, P., Strych, U., Dor, A., Fowler, E. F., & Motta, M. (2021). Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Social Science & Medicine, 272, 113638. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. University of Chicago Press. Caserotti, M., Girardi, P., Rubaltelli, E., Tasso, A., Lotto, L., & Gavaruzzi, T. (2021). Associations of COVID-19 risk perception with vaccine hesitancy over time for Italian residents. Social Science & Medicine, 272, 113688. Chiang, C.-F., Kuo, J., & Liu, J.-T. (2022). Cueing quality: Unpacking country-of-origin effects on intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 314, 115403. Dal, A., & Tokdemir, E. (2022). Social-Psychology of Vaccine Intentions: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust in the Fight Against Covid-19. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1459–1481. Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). Af- fective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(1), 28–38. Druckman, J. N., Ognyanova, K., Baum, M. A., Lazer, D., Perlis, R. H., Volpe, J. D., Santillana, M., Chwe, H., Quintana, A., & Simonson, M. (2021). The role of race, religion, and partisanship in misperceptions about COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 638–657. Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. A. (2013). Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1763–1773. Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications. Expert review of vaccines, 14(1), 99–117. Durbach, N. (2005). Bodily matters: the anti-vaccination movement in England, 1853–1907. Duke University Press. Eastwood, K., Durrheim, D. N., Jones, A., & Butler, M. (2010). Acceptance of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination by the Australian public. The Medical journal of Australia, 192(1), 33–36. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 556–560. Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political Polarization in the American Public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563–588. Fridman, A., Gershon, R., & Gneezy, A. (2021). COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study. PLoS One, 16(4), 1–12. Gaygısız, Ü., Gaygısız, E., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2010). Why were Turks unwilling to accept the A/H1N1 influenza-pandemic vaccination? People’s beliefs and perceptions about the swine flu outbreak and vaccine in the later stage of the epidemic. Vaccine, 29(2), 329–333. Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173. Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Brady, W. J., Parnamets, P., & al, I. G. F. (2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1186–1197. Gotanda, H., Miyawaki, A., Tabuchi, T., & Tsugawa, Y. (2021). Association Between Trust in Government and Practice of Preventive Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(11), 3471–3477. Graupensperger, S., Abdallah, D. A., & Lee, C. M. (2021). Social norms and vaccine uptake: College students' COVID vaccination intentions, attitudes, and estimated peer norms and comparisons with influenza vaccine. Vaccine, 39(15), 2060–2067. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631. Hsiao, Y.-C., & Yu, E. C.-H. (2020). Polarization perception and support for democracy: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(8), 1143–1162. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological methods, 15(4), 309. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, Not Ideology. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. Jaffe, A. E., Graupensperger, S., Blayney, J. A., Duckworth, J. C., & Stappenbeck, C. A. (2022). The role of perceived social norms in college student vaccine hesitancy: Implications for COVID-19 prevention strategies. Vaccine, 40(12), 1888–1895. Jamison, A. M., Quinn, S. C., & Freimuth, V. S. (2019). "You don’t trust a government vaccine": Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults. Social Science & Medicine, 221, 87–94. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health education quarterly, 11(1), 1–47. Jones, D. R., & McDermott, M. L. (2022). Partisanship and the Politics of COVID Vaccine Hesitancy. Polity, 000–000. Jones-Jang, S. M., & Noland, C. (2022). The Politicization of Health and Science: Role of Political Cues in Shaping the Beliefs of the Vaccine-Autism Link. Health Communication, 37(5), 608–616. Joslyn, M. R., & Sylvester, S. M. (2019). The Determinants and Consequences of Accurate Beliefs About Childhood Vaccinations. American Politics Research, 47(3), 628–649. Juen, C.-M., Jankowski, M., Huber, R. A., Frank, T., Maaß, L., & Tepe, M. (2021). Who wants COVID-19 vaccination to be compulsory? The impact of party cues, left- right ideology, and populism. Politics. Klymak, M., & Vlandas, T. (2022). Partisanship and Covid-19 vaccination in the UK. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 19785. Krupenkin, M. (2021). Does partisanship affect compliance with government recommendations? Political behavior, 43(1), 451–472. Larson, H. J., Clarke, R. M., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Levine, Z., Schulz, W. S., & Paterson, P. (2018). Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1599–1609. Latkin, C. A., Dayton, L., Yi, G., Konstantopoulos, A., & Boodram, B. (2021). Trust in a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S.: A social-ecological perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 270, 113684. Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 83–110. Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., Kimball, S., & El-Mohandes, A. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature medicine, 27(2), 225–228. Lin, C., Tu, P., & Terry, T. C. (2022). Moving the needle on racial disparity: COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy. Vaccine, 40(1), 5–8. MacDonald, N. E., & Sage Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161–4164. Meppelink, C. S., Smit, E. G., Fransen, M. L., & Diviani, N. (2019). "I was right about vaccination": Confirmation bias and health literacy in online health information seeking. Journal of health communication, 24(2), 129–140. Merkley, E., & Loewen, P. J. (2022). The correlates and dynamics of COVID-19 vaccine-specific hesitancy. Vaccine, 40(13), 2020–2027. Mesch, G. S., & Schwirian, K. P. (2015). Social and political determinants of vaccine hesitancy: Lessons learned from the H1N1 pandemic of 2009-2010. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(11), 1161–1165. Moon, W.-K., Atkinson, L., Kahlor, L. A., Yun, C., & Son, H. (2022). US political partisanship and COVID-19: Risk information seeking and prevention behaviors. Health Communication, 37(13), 1671–1681. Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger affects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211, 274–281. Motta, M. (2021). Republicans, Not Democrats, Are More Likely to Endorse Anti-Vaccine Misinformation. American Politics Research, 49(5), 428–438. Motta, M. (2023). Is Cancer Immune from Partisan Polarization? How Partisan Identity Motivates Opposition to Preventative Cancer Vaccination in the U.S. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 0(0), 1–25. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175–220. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine, 33(3), 459–464. Pink, S. L., Chu, J., Druckman, J. N., Rand, D. G., & Willer, R. (2021). Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32). Quinn, S., Jamison, A., Musa, D., Hilyard, K., & Freimuth, V. (2016). Exploring the continuum of vaccine hesitancy between African American and white adults: results of a qualitative study. PLoS currents, 8. Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Ortiz-Ospina, E., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Beltekian, D., & Roser, M. (2020). Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus Saleska, J. L., & Choi, K. R. (2021). A behavioral economics perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine amid public mistrust. Translational behavioral medicine, 11(3), 821–825. Schmid, P., Rauber, D., Betsch, C., Lidolt, G., & Denker, M. L. (2017). Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior - A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 - 2016. PLoS One, 12(1), e0170550. Schwarzinger, M., Watson, V., Arwidson, P., Alla, F., & Luchini, S. (2021). COVID- 19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. The Lancet Public Health, 6(4), e210–e221. Setbon, M., & Raude, J. (2010). Factors in vaccination intention against the pandemic influenza A/H1N1. European Journal of Public Health, 20(5), 490–494. Sheng, S.-Y., & Liao, H.-C. M. (2017). Issues, political cleavages, and party competition in Taiwan. In C. H. Achen & T. Y. Wang (Eds.), The Taiwan Voter (pp. 98–138). University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI. Thomson, A., Robinson, K., & Vallee-Tourangeau, G. (2016). The 5As: A practical taxonomy for the determinants of vaccine uptake. Vaccine, 34(8), 1018–1024. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Second edition.). The MIT Press. Yu, C.-H. (2004). Direction and strength of voter's party identification in Taiwan after 2000. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 19, 39–70. Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. Zampetakis, L. A., & Melas, C. (2021). The health belief model predicts vaccination intentions against COVID-19: A survey experiment approach. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(2), 469–484. Zimet, G. D., Rosberger, Z., Fisher, W. A., Perez, S., & Stupiansky, N. W. (2013). Beliefs, behaviors and HPV vaccine: correcting the myths and the misinformation. Prev Med, 57(5), 414–418. BBC News 中文. (2021). 台灣疫情：從「乏人問津」到「稀缺搶手」的「疫苗之亂」. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/57499969 三立新聞網. (2021). 高端第一劑抗體低?張志豪曝「自費檢驗結果」：打臉質疑. https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=995966 中央廣播電台. (2021). 民進黨「高端人士」集結力挺國產疫苗提升國力. https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2109320 中央社. (2021a). 政院：政府全力協助但郭台銘獲BNT回信「只賣給政府」. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202106180144.aspx 中央社. (2021b). 江啟臣：與國民黨執政4縣市申購500萬劑BNT疫苗. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202107140175.aspx 內政部. (2023). 15 歲以上者按縣市與教育、識字率. https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=15373 吳重禮 & 許文賓. (2003). 誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民？——以二○○一年台灣地區選 民政黨認同的決定因素為例. 政治科學論叢, (18), 101–140. 國家發展委員會. (2022). 人口推估查詢系統：單齡人口數. https://pop-proj.ndc.gov. tw/dataSearch4.aspx?uid=3109&pid=59 國民黨文傳會. (2021a). 利益迴避自由心證？疫苗審查黑箱無公信力！. http://www.kmt.org.tw/2021/08/blog-post_19.html 國民黨文傳會. (2021b). 臺大公衛示警第3劑不加速「2月疫情恐不可控」 國民黨示警：莫德納、BNT庫存不夠！. http://www.kmt.org.tw/2022/01/32bnt.html 國民黨立法院黨團. (2021). 疫苗騙子蔡英文要死多少人?台灣人才有疫苗打？[新聞稿（摘自國民黨立法院黨團臉書）]. https://www.facebook.com/kmtcaucus/posts/2604339499862893 官晨怡, 邱弘毅, & 張書森. (2021). 台灣新冠疫苗眾決策態度之快速質性研究調查報告. 張傳賢. (2012). 政黨認同、負面資訊的競爭與選民投票抉擇：2010年五都選舉的實證研究. 選舉研究, 19(2), 37–70. 新頭殼. (2021). 斷章取義. 欺騙人民！莊競程「覺得不爽」控國民黨8項指控都是抹黑. https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2021-06-20/591792 民主進步黨. (2021). 民主進步黨第十九屆第四十六次中常會新聞稿. https://www.dpp.org.tw/media/contents/9222 盛杏湲. (2010). 台灣選民政黨認同的穩定與變遷：定群追蹤資料的應用. 選舉研究, 17(2), 1–33. 盛治仁. (2003). 台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究——政黨輪替前後的比較. 選舉 研究, 10(1), 115–169. 總統府. (2021). 總統率先施打國產高端疫苗. https://www.president.gov.tw/News/26168 總統府. (2022). 總統及副總統接種第三劑高端疫苗. https://www.president.gov.tw/News/26498 羅尹悅 & 黃俊儒. (2022). 那年，我們不打的疫苗——政黨屬性與我們的疫苗抉擇. 聯合新聞網. (2022). 藍批高端效期二次展延食藥署：BNT、莫德納也延過. https://udn.com/news/story/122190/6149387 自由時報. (2022). 高端一度不好預約陳亭妃等人接種第三劑力挺國產疫苗. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3821809 莊文忠, 徐明莉, 黃東益, & 李仲彬. (2017). 政黨認同如何影響民衆對政府清廉的評價. 東吳政治學報, 35(1), 93–141. 華視新聞網. (2022). 盼拋磚引玉陳時中第3劑疫苗打"高端". https://news.cts.com.tw/cts/life/202202/202202252072886.html 蔡佳泓. (2007). 民主深化或政黨競爭？初探台灣2004年公民投票參與. 台灣政治學刊, 11(1), 109–145. 蕭怡靖. (2014). 從政黨情感溫度計解析台灣民眾的政治極化. 選舉研究, 21(2), 1–42. 蕭怡靖. (2019). 台灣民衆的黨性極化及其對民主態度的影響. 台灣政治學刊, 23(2), 41–85. 蕭怡靖 & 林聰吉. (2013). 台灣政治極化之初探：測量與分析. In 吳重禮, 林長志, 王宏忠, & 黃紀 (Eds.), 臺灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)方法論之回顧與前瞻(pp. 89–133). 台北：五南. 衛福部疾管署. (2021a). 各類COVID-19疫苗接種對象累計接種人次與各縣市COVID-19 疫苗接種率（累計至12月27日止）. 衛福部疾管署. (2021b). 網傳「政府不願購買某公司COVID-19疫苗」，指揮中心：不實訊息勿轉傳以免觸法. https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Bulletin/Detail/EpTB77N_H09Ns-bEUnAM5A?typeid=8772 衛福部疾管署. (2021c). 網傳「政府讓人民施打未受認證且保護力低之國產疫苗」 指揮中心：會把關國產疫苗品質、安全及療效. https://www.cdc.gov.tw/ Bulletin/Detail/PmSCiSjM5YpCUxXqoS81RA?typeid=8772 衛福部疾管署. (2022). 各類COVID-19疫苗接種對象累計接種人次與各縣市COVID-19疫苗接種率（累計至111年7月11日止）. 邱鈺婷. (2012). 台灣民眾對於核能發電態度與其政黨傾向關聯性之探討. 陳陸輝. (2000). 台灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷. 選舉研究, 7(2), 109–141. 陳陸輝, 耿曙, & 王德育. (2009). 兩岸關係與 2008 年台灣總統大選: 認同, 利益, 威脅與選民投票取向. 選擧硏究, 16(2), 1–22. 風傳媒. (2022). 第3劑打mRNA疫苗最有效？陳時中急呼籲:高端沒有比較差！. https://www.storm.mg/article/4281461 黃俊儒 & 羅尹悅. (2023). 當科學知識遇上意識形態？民眾對於COVID-19疫情訊息的態度與認知. 傳播研究與實踐, 13(1), 149–183. 黃秀端. (2004). 政黨輪替前後的立法院內投票結盟. 選舉研究, 11(1), 1–32. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88173 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 疫苗政治化是許多國家在新冠疫情期間常見的現象。然而，有別於歐美國家在疫苗猶豫上的政治化，台灣的新冠疫苗政治化卻出現在品牌挑選上。植於投票理論以及政黨與疫苗的相關研究，本文認為政黨認同不但會增加民眾對所屬政黨背書新冠疫苗的接種意願，也會使民眾對所屬政黨背書新冠疫苗有較高的品質認知。以民主進步黨對高端疫苗的公開背書為背景，本研究在個體層次的民意調查資料中發現支持本文論點的經驗證據。藉由中介分析，本文也發現政府信任分別是執政黨政黨認同與高端疫苗選擇以及高端疫苗品質認知的顯著中介變數；本篇研究甚至更發現執政黨支持者評價高端疫苗的正面與負面資訊的路徑機制有所不同。總上，本文對於疫苗政治化的比較研究做出了具體的貢獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Vaccine politicization was common in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Distinct from Western countries, where the politicization of the COVID vaccine occurred to vaccine hesitancy, Taiwan experienced the politicization of the COVID vaccine brand choice. Building on the theory of voting and related studies on political parties and vaccines, this study argues that individual citizens would be more likely to accept a COVID vaccine brand their affiliated party publicly endorsed and have a higher quality perception of the party-endorsed vaccine. Leveraging the Democratic Progressive Party's public endorsement of the Medigen COVID vaccine during the pandemic as a background, this study finds empirical evidence consistent with the argument from individual-level survey data. Through mediation analyses, this study also shows that trust in government was a robust mediator between the incumbent party identification and the choice of the Medigen COVID-19 vaccine as well as its quality perception, respectively; this study even further finds that the incumbent party supporters formed positive and negative quality perceptions of the Medigen COVID-19 vaccine through distinct causal pathways. To sum up, this thesis contributes to comparative research on vaccine politicization. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:37:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:37:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 章節目錄 V 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與問題 1 1.2 研究目的與貢獻 2 1.3 章節安排 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 政黨政治對民眾行為的影響 6 2.2 影響疫苗行為的原因：從健康行為到政府信任 10 2.3 政黨認同對疫苗行為的影響 13 2.4 小結 15 第三章 理論假設與研究設計 17 3.1 理論架構 17 3.2 研究背景：新冠疫苗爭議在台灣 19 3.3 研究假設 21 3.4 資料來源 23 3.5 變項操作化 24 3.6 模型設定與預期結果 28 第四章 實證結果 31 4.1 敘述性統計 31 4.2 交叉分析 33 4.3 迴歸分析結果 39 4.4 小結 49 第五章 穩健度測試與延伸討論 51 5.1 估計方法變換測試：選擇高端疫苗Bivariate Probit估計 51 5.2 自變項變換測試 53 5.3 樣本代表性測試：權重最小平方法估計 56 5.4 延伸討論：疫苗品質認知的確認性偏誤 60 第六章 結論 65 6.1 研究發現與成果 65 6.2 研究限制與建議 68 6.3 研究建議與展望 70 參考文獻 71 附錄A —— 變項操作化說明 82 附錄B —— 敘述性統計 87 B.1 依變項敘述性統計 87 B.2 自變項敘述性統計 88 B.3 中介變項敘述性統計 88 B.4 控制變項敘述性統計 89 附錄C —— 自變項變換測試完整報表 91 附錄D —— 樣本代表性測試完整報表 95 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 疫苗政治化：台灣民眾的政黨認同與新冠疫苗品牌選擇之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Vaccine Politicalization: Partisanship and COVID-19 Vaccine Choice among People in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江淳芳;官晨怡;俞振華 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Fang Chiang;Chen-I Kuan;Chen-Hua Yu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 政黨認同,疫苗政治化,品牌選擇,品質認知,中介分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Party Identification,Vaccine Politicization,Brand Choice,Quality Perception,Mediation Analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 98 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301672 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-19 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 1.66 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。