請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88147
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張宏浩 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hung-Hao Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林遠綸 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yuan-Lun Lin | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T16:30:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
行政院農業委員會(2000)台灣農業發展歷程與現階段面臨問題。https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=3040 行政院農業委員會(2001)。支持農林漁牧業普查,掌握最新資訊。農政與農情,107。 行政院農業委員會(2023)。綠色環境給付計畫。https://www.afa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=286 行政院農業委員會(2023)。推動小地主大專業農,提升經營規模與效益。https://www.afa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=724&article_id=4228 周怡伶(2020)。以普查追蹤資料研析農家經營情形。主計月刊,773,76-81。 廖安定和魏碧珠(2006)。推動農業經營企業化 建立農業中衛體系之思維與做法。農政與農情,174。 英文部分 Bentley, J. W. (1987). Economic and Ecological Approaches to Land Fragmentation: in Defense of a Much-Maligned Phenomenon. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16(1), 31-67. Blarel, B., Hazell, P., Place, F., and Quiggin, J. (1992). The Economics of Farm Fragmentation: Evidence from Ghana and Rwanda. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2), 233-254. Brabec, E., and Smith, C. (2002). Agricultural Land Fragmentation: The Spatial Effects of Three Land Protection Strategies in the Eastern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2-4), 255-268. Ciaian, P., Guri, F., Rajcaniova, M., Drabik, D., and y Paloma, S. G. (2018). Land Fragmentation and Production Diversification: A Case Study from Rural Albania. Land Use Policy, 76, 589-599. Farmer, B. H. (1960). On Not Controlling Subdivision in Paddy-Lands. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers), (28), 225-235. Farley, K. A., Ojeda-Revah, L., Atkinson, E. E., and Eaton-González, B. R. (2012). Changes in Land Use, Land Tenure, and Landscape Fragmentation in the Tijuana River Watershed Following Reform of The Ejido Sector. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 187-197. Galt, A. H. (1979). Exploring the Cultural Ecology of Field Fragmentation and Scattering on the Island of Pantelleria, Italy. Journal of Anthropological Research, 35(1), 93-108. Helfand, S. M., and Taylor, M. P. (2021). The Inverse Relationship Between Farm Size and Productivity: Refocusing the Debate. Food Policy, 99, 101977. Kalantari, K., and Abdollahzadeh, G. (2008). Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Iran: A Case Study of Ramjerd Sub District in Fars Province. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 3(1), 358-363. Kadigi, R. M., Kashaigili, J. J., Sirima, A., Kamau, F., Sikira, A., and Mbungu, W. (2017). Land Fragmentation, Agricultural Productivity and Implications for Agricultural Investments in The Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) Region, Tanzania. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 9(2), 26-36. King, R., and Burton, S. (1982). Land Fragmentation: Notes on A Fundamental Rural Spatial Problem. Progress in Human Geography, 6(4), 475-494. Lisec, A., and Pintar, M. (2005). Conservation of Natural Ecosystems by Land Consolidation in The Rural Landscape. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 85(1), 73-82. Latruffe, L., and Piet, L. (2014). Does Land Fragmentation Affect Farm Performance? A Case Study from Brittany, France. Agricultural Systems, 129, 68-80. Looga, J., Jürgenson, E., Sikk, K., Matveev, E., and Maasikamäe, S. (2018). Land Fragmentation and Other Determinants of Agricultural Farm Productivity: The Case of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 79, 285-292. Muchová, Z. L. A. T. I. C. A., and Petrovič, F. R. A. N. T. I. Š. E. K. (2010). Changes in the Landscape Due to Land Consolidations. Ekológia (Bratislava), 29(2), 140-157. Muyanga, M., and Jayne, T. S. (2019). Revisiting the Farm Size‐Productivity Relationship Based on A Relatively Wide Range of Farm Sizes: Evidence from Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101(4), 1140-1163. Ntihinyurwa, P. D., and de Vries, W. T. (2020). Farmland Fragmentation and Defragmentation Nexus: Scoping the Causes, Impacts, and The Conditions Determining Its Management Decisions. Ecological Indicators, 119, 106828. Sorbi, U. (1952). Land Fragmentation and Dispersion in Italy. International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, 1(4), 44-53. Sanderatne, N. (1972). New Land Reform in Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Land Tenure Cent LTC Publ. (37), 18-22. Sklenicka, P., and Salek, M. (2008). Ownership and Soil Quality as Sources of Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Highly Fragmented Ownership Patterns. Landscape Ecology, 23, 299-311. Vijulie, I., Matei, E., Manea, G., Cocoş, O., and Cuculici, R. (2012). Assessment of Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Romania, A Case Study: Izvoarele Commune, Olt County. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 52(2), 403-430. Wang, Y. H., Li, X. B., and Xin, L. J. (2019). Characteristics of Cropland Fragmentation and Its Impact on Agricultural Production Costs in Mountainous Areas. Journal of Natural Resources, 34, 2658-2672. Wang, Y., Li, X., Lu, D., and Yan, J. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Land Fragmentation on the Cost of Agricultural Operation in the Southwest Mountainous Areas of China. Land Use Policy, 99, 105099. Yu, P., Fennell, S., Chen, Y., Liu, H., Xu, L., Pan, J., Bai, S., and Gu, S. (2022). Positive Impacts of Farmland Fragmentation on Agricultural Production Efficiency in Qilu Lake Watershed: Implications for Appropriate Scale Management. Land Use Policy, 117, 106-108. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88147 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 由於農地規模的限制一直是臺灣農業的一大問題,與之而來的農地零碎化的相關議題在臺灣也時常被提及,但卻少有相關研究討論其問題對臺灣農民的影響,因此本研究便想透過計量模型進行實證分析去回答相關的問題。如今臺灣農業生產有超過八成的農民生產規模在一公頃之下,而超過兩公頃的農場僅有不到百分之五,可見如今臺灣大多數農民都屬於小農生產的經營模式,而為鼓勵民眾提升生產規模,政府也推出小地主大專業農政策,補貼離農地主以低價出租土地給與其他農民,並鼓勵青農、高學歷的大專業投入農業市場,並且在政策中也有降低農地零碎化的意識,因此在媒合地主與農民時會盡量使其耕作農地在相同地區以降低農地零碎的情況。而本研究參考多篇外國文獻並利用主計處的農牧戶普查資料進行相關研究,本文發現農地規模在不同水準下農家土地零碎化對農家生產力會呈現U型關係,大約在土地零碎指標為0.5時農家生產力最低,若繼續分割後農家生產力反而會有所提升,而這也說明了在進行農地分割的決策時,平均分割會降低其帶來的負面效果,在土地零碎化指標所示當指標小於0.5時代表其分割模式是有明顯較大的地塊以及多塊較小地塊組成,這時的生產力衝擊會較平均分割嚴重,可能原因是平均分割能藉由生產多種作物分散風險提升農民收益。將樣本分為不同作物進行分析時,發現此時政府補貼生產的政策會在比較不同產業時出現相關影響,尤其是受對地綠色補貼的稻米以及雜糧類作物會因為相關補貼使得土地零碎化的影響消失甚至因為分割農地能夠配合補貼進行生產獲得更高的收益。由以上可見對農民而言土地零碎化雖然在生產上會有負面效果,但卻也能配合多元的生產決策創造收益。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Land fragmentation is a significant issue in Taiwan's agriculture, but not much is known about its impact on farmers. This study uses econometric models and data from the Census of Agriculture to analyze how land fragmentation affects farmers' productivity. The results of the analysis reveals a U-shaped pattern between agricultural land fragmentation and farmers' productivity across different land scales. Farmers' productivity is lowest when the land fragmentation index is around 0.5. However, further subdivision of land can lead to better productivity. This suggests that average fragmentation can mitigate the negative effects, as a fragmentation index below 0.5 indicates larger and multiple smaller land plots, which have a more severe impact on productivity. This may be due to the fact that average fragmentation allows for risk diversification and increases income through the cultivation of multiple crops. When examining different crop industries, government subsidies for production play a significant role. In particular, subsidies like the Green Subsidy have a diminishing or even positive effect on profits when comparing rice and miscellaneous crops. In conclusion, while land fragmentation negatively affects farmers' productivity, it also offers opportunities for diverse production decisions and income generation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:30:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:30:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目 錄 iii 圖 目 錄 iv 表 目 錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧與簡介 7 第一節 農地零碎化的概念及不同定義 7 第二節 農地零碎化對農業生產的影響 8 第三節 臺灣現今對產值以及生產規模造成影響之相關政策 9 第四節 文獻及政策回顧之發現 14 第三章 資料介紹 16 第一節 農林漁牧普查介紹 16 第二節 農戶牧普查資料介紹 18 第三節 資料處理過程 20 第四節 指標定義及變數篩選 24 第五節 敘述統計 27 第四章 實證分析模型 40 第一節 二元固定效果模型 40 第二節 總樣本模型設計 42 第五章 實證結果 43 第一節 未分組之全樣本模型迴歸結果 43 第二節 依不同作物經營類型分組之樣本模型迴歸結果 68 第三節 迴歸結果總結 116 第六章 結論與建議 119 第一節 結論 119 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 123 參考文獻 124 中文部分 124 英文部分 124 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 農地零碎化對臺灣農家生產力的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Farm Fragmentation on Farm Household Productivity | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾秋悅;吳佳勳;廖培安 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yessica C. Y. Chung;Chia-Hsuan Wu;Pei-An Liao | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 土地零碎化,生產規模,農家生產力,二元固定效果模型,農業政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Land fragmentation,Production scale,Farm household productivity,Binary fixed effects model,Agricultural policies, | en |
dc.relation.page | 126 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301615 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-18 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.53 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。