請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88138
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊明仁 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Jen Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃詣軒 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsuan Huang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T16:28:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-14 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Alvey, G. R., E. Zipser, and J. Zawislak, 2020: How does Hurricane Edouard (2014) evolve toward symmetry before rapid intensification? A high-resolution ensemble study. J. Atmos. Soc., 77, 1329–1351.
Bu Y., 2012: Factors That Can Influence the Onset Time of Rapid Intensification of Tropical Cyclones, University of California Los Angeles Master Thesis. Cecil, D. J., and E. J. Zipser, 1999: Relationships between tropical cyclone intensity and satellite-based indicators of inner core convection: 85-GHz ice-scattering signature and lightning. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 103–123. Corbosiero, K. L., and J. Molinari, 2002: The effects of vertical wind shear on the distribution of convection in tropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2110–2123. Corbosiero, K. L., and J. Molinari, 2003: The relationship between storm motion, vertical wind shear, and convective asymmetries in tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 366–376. Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984: Development and structure of winter monsoon cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 933–960. DeHart, J. C., R. A. Houze, and R. F. Rogers, 2014: Quadrant distribution of tropical cyclone inner-core kinematics in relation to environmental shear. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2713–2732. Didlake, A. C., and R. A. Houze Jr., 2009: Convective-scale downdrafts in the principal rainband of Hurricane Katrina (2005). Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3269–3293. Didlake, A. C., and R. A. Houze Jr., 2013a: Convective-scale variations in the innercore rainbands of a tropical cyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 504– 523. Emanuel, K., DesAutels, C., Holloway, C., Korty, R., 2004: Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Atmos. Sci, 61, 843–858. Fovell, R. G., K. L. Corbosiero, and H. C. Kuo, 2009: Cloud microphysics impact on hurricane track as revealed in idealized experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1764–1778. Fovell, R. G., K. L. Corbosiero, A. Seifert, and K.-N. Liou, 2010: Impact of cloud-radiative feedback on hurricane track, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L07,808. Frank, W. M., and E. A. Ritchie, 2001: Effects of vertical wind shear on the intensity and structure of numerically simulated hurricanes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2249–2269. Fritz, C., Z. Wang, S. W. Nesbitt, and T. J. Dunkerton, 2016: Vertical structure and contribution of different types of precipitation during Atlantic tropical cyclone formation as revealed by TRMM PR. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 894–901 GPM Science Team (2016), GPM SSMIS on F16 (GPROF) Radiometer Precipitation Profiling L2 1.5 hours 12 km V05, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed:[February 11, 2023],10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F16/GPROF/2A/05 GPM Science Team (2016), GPM SSMIS on F17 (GPROF) Radiometer Precipitation Profiling L2 1.5 hours 12 km V05, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed:[February 11, 2023],10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F17/GPROF/2A/05 GPM Science Team (2016), GPM SSMIS on F18 (GPROF) Radiometer Precipitation Profiling L2 1.5 hours 12 km V05, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed:[February 11, 2023],10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F18/GPROF/2A/05 Hausman, S. A., K. V. Ooyama, and W. H. Schubert, 2006: Potential vorticity structure of simulated hurricanes, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 87–107. Hence, D. A., and R. A. Houze, 2012: Vertical structure of tropical cyclone rainbands as seen by the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2644–2661. Hendricks, E. A., Peng, M. S., Fu, B. and Li, T.., 2010: Quantifying Environmental Control on Tropical Cyclone Intensity Change. Monthly Weather Rev. 138, 3243–3271. Hersbach, H.,Bell, B.,Berrisford, P.,Hirahara, S.,Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., et al. ,2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049. Homeyer, C. R., Fierro, A. O., Schenkel, B. A., Didlake, A. C., McFarquhar, G. M., Hu, J., Ryzhkov, A. V., Basara, J. B., Murphy, A. M., and Zawislak, J., 2021: Polarimetric Signatures in Landfalling Tropical Cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 149, 131–154. John Janowiak, Bob Joyce, Pingping Xie (2017), NCEP/CPC L3 Half Hourly 4km Global (60S - 60N) Merged IR V1, Edited by Andrey Savtchenko, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed: [February 11, 2023], 10.5067/P4HZB9N27EKU. Kaplan, J., and M. DeMaria, 2003: Large-scale characteristics of rapidly intensifying tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic basin. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1093–1108. Kaplan, J., M. DeMaria, and J. A. Knaff, 2010: A revised tropical cyclone rapid intensification index for the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 220–241. Kessler, E.,1969: On the distribution and continuity of water substance on atmospheric circulation. Meteorol. Monogr., 32, 84. Li, Y., Li, J., Ping, F., and Gao, Z. (2022). Influence of the terminal velocity of graupel on the simulation of a convective system over Beijing.Atmos. Res.274,106181. Li, X., and Z. Pu, 2008: Sensitivity of numerical simulation of early rapid intensification of hurricane emily (2005) to cloud microphysical and planetary boundary layer parameterizations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 48194838. Liu, C. Y., Punay, J. P., Wu, C. C., Chung, K. S. and Aryastana, P.,2022: Characteristics of deep convective clouds, precipitation, and cloud properties of rapidly intensifying tropical cyclones in the western North Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 127, e2022JD037328. Lord, S. J., H. E. Willoughby, and J. M. Piotrowicz, 1984: Role of a parameterized ice-phase microphysics in an axisymmetric, non-hydrostatic tropical cyclone model. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2836–2848. Miyamoto, Y., and T. Takemi, 2013: A transition mechanism for the axisymmetric spontaneous intensification of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 112–129. Montgomery, M. T., and R. J. Kallenbach, 1997: A theory for vortex rossby-waves and its application to spiral bands and intensity changes in hurricanes. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 435-465. Munsell, E. B., Braun, S. A., and Zhang, F., 2021: GOES-16 Observations of Rapidly Intensifying Tropical Cyclones: Hurricanes Harvey (2017), Maria (2017), and Michael (2018). Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 1696–1714. Nolan, D. S., Miyamoto, Y., Wu, S., and Soden, B. J., 2019: On the correlation between Total condensate and moist heating in tropical cyclones and applications for diagnosing intensity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 3759–3784. Richardson J. C., R. D. Torn, and Brian H. Tang, 2022: An Analog Comparison between Rapidly and Slowly Intensifying Tropical Cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 2139–2159. Rogers, R. F., P. D. Reasor, J. A. Zawislak, and L. T. Nguyen, 2020: Precipitation processes and vortex alignment during the intensification of a weak tropical cyclone in moderate vertical shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 1899–1929. Schubert, W. H., Montgomery, M.T., Taft, R.K., Guinn, T.A., Fulton, S.R., Kossin, J.P., Edwards, J.P., 1999: Polygonal eyewalls, asymmetric eye contraction and potential vorticity mixing in hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 1197–1223. Shi, D., and Chen, G., 2021: The implication of outflow structure for the rapid intensification of tropical cyclones under vertical wind shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 4107–4127. Steiner, M., R. A. Houze Jr., and S. E. Yuter, 1995: Climatological characterization of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 1978–2007. Tao, C., and H. Jiang, 2015: Distributions of shallow to very deep precipitation–convection in rapidly intensifying tropical cyclones. J. Climate, 28, 8791–8824. Wadler, J. B., J. A. Zhang, B. Jaimes, and L. K. Shay, 2018b: Downdrafts and the evolution of boundary layer thermodynamics in Hurricane Earl (2010) before and during rapid intensification. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 3545–3565. Wadler, J. B., J. A. Zhang, R. F. Rogers, B. Jaimes, and L. K. Shay, 2021: The rapid intensification of Hurricane Michael (2018): Storm structure and the relationship to environmental and air–sea interactions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 245–267. Wang, M.; Zhao, K.; Pan, Y.; Xue, M., 2020: Evaluation of simulated drop size distributions and microphysical processes using polarimetric radar observations for landfalling Typhoon Matmo (2014). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, 1–20. Wingo, M. T. and D. J. Cecil, 2010: Effects of Vertical Wind Shear on Tropical Cyclone Precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 645-661. Wu, S.-N., B. J. Soden, Y. Miyamoto, D. S. Nolan, and S. A. Buehler, 2021: Using satellite observations to evaluate the relationships between ice condensate, latent heat release, and tropical cyclone intensification in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 113-129. Wu, Y.-C., M.-J. Yang, and R.F. Rogers, 2022: Examining Terrain Effects on the Evolution of Precipitation and Vorticity of Typhoon Fanapi (2010) after Departing the Central Mountain Range on Taiwan. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 1517–1540. Yanai, M., Esbensen, S. and Chu, J.-H., 1973: Determination of bulk properties of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budgets. J. Atmos. Sci. 30, 611–627. Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency distribution of vertical velocity, reflectivity, and differential reflectivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1941–1963. Zhu, T., and D.-L. Zhang, 2006: Numerical simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Sensitivity to varying cloud microphysical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 109–126. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88138 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 我們對於快速增強(Rapid Intensification;RI)和緩慢增強(Slow Intensification;SI)颱風之間的降雨類型和雲微物理特徵的差異與演變目前的認知有限。為討論此議題,我們不僅分析了SSMIS (Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder)儀器反演的冰水路徑(Ice Water Path;IWP)和雨水路徑(Rain Water Path;RWP)及紅外頻道的亮溫(Brightness Temperature),還進行了WRF(Weather Research and Forecasting)模式模擬,以討論RI和SI的颱風之間降雨類型和雲微物理特徵的差異與演變。此外,我們分別針對RI和SI個案使用WRF模式進行暖雲和冷雲微物理方案的影響敏感度測試。
從SSMIS觀測中,我們發現在2倍最大風速半徑(RMW)以內,RI颱風的IWP和RWP的量值在增強開始前12小時之後大於SI颱風的量值。且在增強開始前12小時和增強開始後的12及24小時,IWP和RWP在2倍RMW內,95%的信心水準下RI颱風顯著多於SI颱風的量值。而紅外頻道的亮溫則指出:在增強前12小時的時候,颱風3RMW內的區域RI颱風個案的亮溫低於SI的颱風個案,並於增強開始後2RMW內多數區域紅外的亮溫於95%的信心水準下RI颱風顯著低於SI颱風的量值,尤其是在上風切處格外顯著。 不論是在SSMIS觀測或WRF模擬結果,我們發現颱風增強開始前IWP和RWP在下風切處量值大於上風切處,其中又以Downshear Left (DL)象限的量值最大。 RI開始後,Upshear Left (UL)象限中的IWP和RWP逐漸增大,但是SI的颱風並沒有出現類似的演變。同時我們亦發現RI颱風個案在其RI正要開始前,IWP與RWP及對流有發生快速減弱的情形。 在WRF控制組模擬RI和SI 個案降水類型的差異比較中,我們發現進行分析的大多數時段中,RI 颱風個案中DL和UL象限的深對流(DC)和中等對流(MC)的比率大於SI 颱風個案的比率。同時資料顯示,不論RI或SI的颱風個案其上風切處的層狀降水(ST)面積,均在增強(RI/SI)開始的前後有逐漸增加的情形。 在暖雲敏感度模擬實驗中,我們發現RI颱風個案其RI開始的時間明顯提前,而SI颱風個案則沒有發生類似現象。暖雲實驗指出,RI和SI的個案在增強(RI/SI)開始後其對流強度均不及控制組的對流強度,且暖雲實驗中ST和WE的面積高於控制組的面積,此情形在颱風的上風切處格外顯著。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The differences and evolution of rainfall regimes and microphysics characteristics between rapidly-intensifying (RI) and slowly-intensifying (SI) tropical cyclones (TCs) are not well discussed understood. Owing to this predicament, we analyzed the ice water path (IWP) and rain water path (RWP) retrieved from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS), brightness temperaute from infrared channel, and conducted the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) simulations to examine the differences and evolution of rainfall regimes and microphysics characteristics between RI and SI TCs. To clarify the influences by warm-rain and cold-rain microphysics schemes, we also conducted sensitivity tests with the WRF model on RI and SI cases, respectively.
From the SSMIS observations, we found that the IWP and RWP in RI TCs were greater than those in SI TCs within twice the radius of maximum wind speed (RMW) 12 hours before the intensification onset. The differences in IWP and RWP between RI and SI TCs within the RMW were significant at the 95% confidence level at the intensification onset and within twice the RMW at 12 hours before, 12 hours after, and 24 hours after the intensification onset. The brightness temperature analysis of infrared channel indicated that, at 12 hours before intensification onset, the brightness temperature of the RI cases was lower than that of the SI cases within 3RMW. After the onset of intensification, the RI cases exhibited significantly lower infrared brightness temperatures compared to the SI cases at the 95% confidence level within most of the area of 2RMW. This difference was particularly prominent in the upshear quadrant. Both the SSMIS observations and WRF simulations showed that the IWP and RWP were generally larger in the downshear flank before the intensification onset, especially in the downshear left (DL) quadrant. The IWP and RWP in upshear left (UL) quadrant gradually became larger after the RI onset, yet similar evolution did not occur in SI TCs. The IWP and RWP were quickly weakened just before the RI onset in RI TCs. We also compared the differences of precipitation regimes between RI and SI TCs. We found that the ratios of deep convection (DC) and moderate convection (MC) at DL and UL quadrants in RI TCs were greater than those in SI TCs for most periods we analyzed. The ratios of stratiform precipitation (ST) at UL and upshear right (UR) quadrants gradually increased after the RI and SI onset when we analyzed precipitation type including non-precipitating grids. From the warm-rain sensitivity tests, we found that the timing of the RI onset significantly occurred earlier while the same consequence did not occur in SI case. We not only demonstrated that the precipitation intensity and convection were weaker in both RI and SI case after intensification began, but also found that the ratios of ST and WE were greater in warm rain experiment than those in control runs in precipitation type analysis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:28:11Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:28:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iv 英文摘要 vi 目錄 viii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xi 第一章、 緒論 1 1.1文獻回顧 1 1.2研究動機 3 1.3論文架構 3 第二章、 研究方法 5 2.1衛星資料處理與介紹 5 2.2颱風路徑強度與最大風速半徑 6 2.3再分析資料與風切計算 7 2.4 WRF模式設定 7 2.5降雨類型分類與軸對稱性計算 9 2.6 颱風個案背景介紹 11 第三章、 SSMIS衛星資料與WRF模式控制組比較分析 12 3.1 SSMIS衛星資料合成分析之比較 12 3.2 SSMIS衛星資料與WRF模擬之比較 15 3.3 WRF模擬控制組RI與SI(未伴隨RI之個案)之結果比較 19 3.4 WRF模擬控制組RI與SI(伴隨RI之個案)之結果比較 27 第四章、 冷暖雲微物理參數法敏感度實驗 30 4.1 WRF冷暖雲微物理參數法RI個案之比較 30 4.2 WRF冷暖雲微物理參數法SI個案之比較 34 第五章、結論 39 參考文獻 43 表 48 圖 54 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 快速增強與緩慢增強颱風雲微物理與降雨類型之比較研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Comparison Study of Rainfall Regimes and Microphysics Characteristics between Rapidly-Intensifying and Slow-intensifying Tropical Cyclones | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭鴻基;陳正平;劉千義 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hung-Chi Kuo;Jen-Ping Chen;Chian-Yi Liu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 快速增強,緩慢增強,冰水路徑,雨水路徑,降雨類型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Rapid Intensification (RI),Slow Intensification (SI),Ice Water Path (IWP),Rain Water Path (RWP),rainfall regimes, | en |
dc.relation.page | 126 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301514 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-14 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 大氣科學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 大氣科學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 12.45 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。