請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88038
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林博文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bou-Wen Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林姿吟 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yin Lin | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-01T16:32:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-01 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 馬秀如(2005)。內部控制之延伸—風險管理 釐清觀念架構 創造企業價值。 會計研究月刊,(238),30-47。 2. 王宏瑞(2016)。淺談美國COSO委員會之「企業風險管理─整合架構」報告。集保結算所月刊,(225),8-33。 3. 黃國寶(2010)。ISO 31000風險管理之要求及應用探討。永續產業發展雙月刊,(53),48-56。 4. 世界自然基金會(2020)。地球生命力報告2020 扭轉生物多樣性喪失趨勢摘要。https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/uploads/2020/09/LPR2020-Summary-Chinese-Traditional.pdf 5. 楊懿如(2018)。台灣的蛙類與環境之關係。臺中區農業改良場特刊,(135),155-163。 6. 玉山金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。2022玉山金控公司年報。玉山金融控股股份有限公司出版。 7. 玉山金融控股股份有限公司(2021)。2021玉山金控公司年報。玉山金融控股股份有限公司出版。 8. 玉山金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。2021玉山金控永續報告書。玉山金融控股股份有限公司出版。 9. 玉山金融控股股份有限公司(2023)。2021氣候暨自然環境報告書。玉山金融控股股份有限公司出版。 10. 玉山金融控股股份有限公司(2021)。2020玉山金控永續報告書。玉山金融控股股份有限公司出版。 11. 富邦金融控股股份有限公司(2023)。2022富邦金控股東會年報。富邦金融控股股份有限公司出版。 12. 富邦金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。2021富邦金控永續報告書。富邦金融控股股份有限公司出版。 13. 富邦金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。2021富邦金控TCFD報告書。富邦金融控股股份有限公司出版。 英文部分 1. Lundqvist, S. A. (2015). Why Firms Implement Risk Governance – Stepping beyond Traditional Risk Management to Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(5), 441–466. 2. Bromiley, P. (2015). Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265–276. 3. Khan, M. J., Hussain, D., & Mehmood, W. (2016). Why Do Firms Adopt Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)? Empirical Evidence from France. Management Decision, 54(8), 1886–1907. 4. Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of accounting and public policy, 28(4), 301-327. 5. Chairani, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2021). The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 647-670. 6. Fox, C. (2018). Understanding the new ISO and COSO updates. Risk Management, 65(6), 4-7. 7. Slabotsky, R. (2023). Inherent Risk vs. Residual Risk Explained in 90 Seconds. Retrieved from https://www.fairinstitute.org/blog/inherent-risk-vs.-residual-risk-explained-in-90-seconds 8. Prewett, K., & Terry, A. (2018). COSO's updated enterprise risk management framework—A quest for depth and clarity. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(3), 16-23. 9. COSO (2017). Enterprise Risk Management-Integrating with Strategy and Performance. Retrieved from https://www.coso.org/Shared%20Documents/2017-COSO-ERM-Integrating-with-Strategy-and-Performance-Executive-Summary.pdf 10. Institute of Risk Management (2018). A Risk Practitioners Guide to ISO 31000: 2018. Retrieved from https://www.theirm.org/news/standard-deviations-a-risk-practitioner-guide-to-iso-31000/ 11. ElBannan, M. A. (2017). The financial crisis, Basel accords and bank regulations: an overview. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(2), 225-275. 12. Alkubaisi, A. A. J. (2017). The importance of (COSO-ERM) model implementation in enhancing the effectiveness of internal control systems in the Jordanian commercial banks (field study). Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 6(1), 156-177. 13. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development:" our common future.". UN. 14. Siew, R. Y. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of environmental management, 164, 180-195. 15. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of cleaner production, 59, 5-21. 16. World Economic Forum (2020). Half of World’s GDP Moderately or Highly Dependent on Nature, Says New Report. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/press/2020/01/half-of-world-s-gdp-moderately-or-highly-dependent-on-nature-says-new-report/ 17. TNFD (2023). Welcome to the TNFD Nature-Related Risk & Opportunity Management and Disclosure Framework. Retrieved from https://framework.tnfd.global 18. TCFD (2023). Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/recommendations/ 19. UNEP (2018). Inclusive Wealth Report 2018. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/26776/Inclusive_Wealth_ES.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 20. UNEP (2023). Exploring Natural Capital Opportunities, Risks and Exposure. Retrieved from https://encore.naturalcapital.finance/en/about 21. Kedward, K., Ryan-Collins, J., & Buller, A. (2021). Quantitative easing and nature loss: Exploring nature-related financial risks and impacts in the european central bank's corporate bond portfolio. Available at SSRN 3922913 22. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88038 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2021年,由來自金融機構、企業以及市場服務提供商等40名成員組成自然相關財務揭露小組(Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures,TNFD),旨在提供企業一套風險管理以及揭露框架,提供企業衡量與自然有關的風險後制定策略與應對措施,目標是達到將金流導向對自然有正向影響的活動之中,而作為金流中介者的金融機構扮演著重要的角色,金融機構可透過借貸與投資將資源投入環境友善的產業,進而達到TNFD之目標。
對於台灣的金融機構來說,導入TNFD架構可以更完善原有的企業風險管理以及制定更全面的永續策略。金融機構的自然相關風險主要來自於投融資的企業,諸如石化、農林漁牧以及建築材料產業等較依賴自然資本的產業,自然資本的損失可能最終導致金融機構的資產價值下降、貸款無法回收等風險,而藉由對於自然相關風險的管理可以減少損失發生的可能性。 金融監督管理委員會參考氣候相關財務揭露工作小組(Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures,TCFD)發布之揭露框架,規定自2023年起銀行應於每年6月底前發布前一年度之氣候風險相關財務揭露,因此導入TCFD 架構對於台灣銀行來說已是強制性規範。本研究選擇一家已導入TNFD架構的玉山金控以及一家仍未導入TNFD架構之富邦金控為對象,藉由個案研究法探討玉山金控如何導入TNFD 架構以及透過落差分析,歸納出富邦金控在已導入TCFD架構之基礎上,導入TNFD架構所建議採取之行動方案,進而總結出台灣金融機構導入TNFD架構之發展策略建議以及可能遇到的挑戰,以供台灣金融機構在已導入TCFD且仍未導入TNFD架構之基礎上參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In 2021, the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) was formed, consisting of 40 members from financial institutions, corporations, and market service providers. The objective of TNFD is to provide companies with a risk management and disclosure framework to assess natural-related risks, develop strategies, and implement measures to have a positive impact on nature through financial flows. Financial institutions, as intermediaries in financial transactions, play a crucial role in achieving TNFD's goals by channeling resources through lending and investments into environmentally friendly industries.
For financial institutions in Taiwan, adopting the TNFD framework can enhance existing enterprise risk management and develop comprehensive sustainability strategies. Natural-related risks for financial institutions primarily arise from businesses in sectors such as petrochemicals, agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and construction materials, which rely heavily on natural capital. Losses in natural capital can ultimately lead to a decline in asset value and the inability to recover loans, among other risks. Managing natural-related risks can reduce the likelihood of such losses. The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has referred to the disclosure framework established by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and mandated that banks in Taiwan should disclose climate risk-related financial information by the end of June each year, starting from 2023. Therefore, the adoption of the TCFD framework has become a mandatory requirement for Taiwanese banks. This study focuses on E.SUN Financial Holdings, which has implemented the TNFD framework, and Fubon Financial Holdings, which has not. Through a case study approach and gap analysis, it explores how E.SUN Financial Holdings has implemented the TNFD framework and recommends action plans for Fubon Financial Holdings, building on its existing adoption of the TCFD framework. The study concludes with development strategy recommendations and potential challenges for Taiwanese financial institutions in adopting the TNFD framework, based on the foundation of implementing the TCFD framework. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-01T16:32:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-01T16:32:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 企業風險管理 3 第二節 台灣金融機構之企業風險管理 12 第三節 自然相關財務揭露架構概述與金融機構扮演之角色 14 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 個案研究法 24 第二節 資料蒐集方式 24 第四章 台灣金融機構導入TNFD架構之落差分析與發展策略 25 第一節 台灣金融機構與TNFD架構 25 第二節 台灣金融機構個案分析—玉山金控 26 第三節 台灣金融機構個案分析—富邦金控 34 第四節 金融機構導入TNFD架構之發展策略與挑戰 43 第五章 結論與建議 45 第一節 研究發現 45 第二節 管理意涵 45 第三節 後續研究建議 45 參考資料與文獻 47 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 金融機構導入TNFD架構之落差分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Gap Analysis of Financial Institutions' Adoption of TNFD Framework | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 劉念琪 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Nien-Chi Liu | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳彤泰;郭佳怡 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Rung-Tai Wu;Chia-I Kuo | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 企業風險管理,TNFD,自然相關風險,永續報告工具,ESG, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | enterprise risk management,TNFD,nature-related risks,sustainability reporting tools,ESG, | en |
dc.relation.page | 49 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301349 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-11 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.15 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。