請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87970完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang-Chih Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 向恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | En Hsiang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-01T16:09:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-01 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文文獻
一、 中文書籍 丘宏達（2013），《現代國際法》，三版，三民。 姜皇池（2021），《國際公法導論》，4版，新學林。 二、 中文期刊論文或專書論文 姜皇池（2003），〈SARS相關國際法議題〉，《台灣本土法學雜誌》，46期，頁1-2。 洪銘德（2020），〈中國因應武漢肺炎事件之觀察〉，《國防安全週報》，83期，頁1-10。 傅美惠（2014），〈我國社會秩序維護法與大陸地區治安管理處罰法之比較研析〉，《中央警察大學法學論集》，26期，頁119-141。 賴煥升（2019），〈論損害賠償因果關係－－兼評比例因果關係之適用可能性〉，《全國律師》，23卷10期，頁43-62。 三、 網路文獻 中華人民共和國駐悉尼總領事館（2020），《所謂“中國掩蓋 COVID-19並因此延遲其他國家的反應”的真相--美國針對中國的 COVID-19 指控的真實性檢驗（三）》，載於：http://sydney.china-consulate.gov.cn/eng/zlgdt/202208/t20220825_10752759.htm。 衛生福利部疾病管制署（2020），《疾病介紹》，載於：https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Category/Page/vleOMKqwuEbIMgqaTeXG8A。 貳、 英文文獻 一、 英文書籍 Brown, J. (2004). Hague Court Reports: Comprising the Awards, Accompanied by Syllabi, the Agreements for the Arbitration, and Other Documents in Each Case Submitted to the Permanent Court of Arbitration and to Commissions of Inquiry under the Provisions of the Conventions of 1899 and 1907 for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. Oxford University Press. Burci, G. L. & Vignes, C. H. (2004). World Health Organization. Kluwer Law International. Crawford, J. (2013), State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Daly, B. et al. (2014). A Guide to the PCA Arbitration Rules. Oxford University Press. Duvic-Paoli, L. A. (2018). The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jones N. H. (1975). The Scientific Background of the International Sanitary Conferences 1851-1938. World Health Organization. Kulesza J. (2016). Due Diligence in International Law. Brill Nijhoff. Öğün M. N. & Yurtsever S. (2022). COVID-19 and a World in Chaos. Cambridge Scholars. Ollino, A. (2022). Due Diligence Obligations in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Riddell, A. & Plant B. (2009). Evidence before the International Court of Justice. British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Rubino-Sammartano, M. (2014). International Arbitration Law and Practice (3rd ed.). JurisNet, LLC Publisher. Schulte, C. (2005). Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice. Oxford University Press. Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law (8th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stephens, T. (2009). International Courts and Environmental Protection. Cambridge University Press. Won L. Kidane (2017), The Culture of International Arbitration. Oxford University Press. Xue, H. (2017). Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. Brill Nijhoff. 二、 英文期刊論文或專書論文 Aust A. (2010). Advisory Opinions. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(1), 123-151. Barcroft S. (1989). The Hague Peace Conference of 1899. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 3(1), 55-68. Bartolini G. (2019). A universal treaty for disasters? Remarks on the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters. International Review of the Red Cross, 99(3), 1103-1137. Bazsó G. (2021). All Roads Lead to the Hague? The COVID-19 Pandemic and the No-harm Rule. ELTE Law Journal, 2, 7-21. Becker M. A.＆ Rose C. (2017). Investigating the Value of Site Visits in Inter-State Arbitration and Adjudication. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 8(2), 219-249. Blankenstein, A. V. (1993). Enforcement of an Arbitral Award against a State: with Whom are You Dealing?. Leiden Journal of International Law, 6(2), 357-374. Born G. (2012). A New Generation of International Arbitration. Duke Law Journal, 61(4), 775-879. Buergenthal T. (2009). Lawmaking by The ICJ and Other International Courts, International Law as Law, 103, 403-406. Crawford J. (2002). The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect, American Journal of International Law. 94(4), 874-890. Crawford J. (2016). Flexibility in the Award of Reparation: The Role of the Parties and the Tribunal. in Contemporary Developments in International Law, 690-708. Feehan J. & Apostolopoulos V. (2021). Is COVID-19 The Worst Pandemic?. Maturitas, 149, 56-58. Fidler D. P. (2005). From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations. Chinese Journal of International Law, 4(2), 325-392. Gostin L. O. & Katz R. (2016). The International Health Regulations: The Governing Framework for Global Health Security. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 264-313. Gross L. (2017). The Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran: Phase of Provisional Measures. American Journal of International Law, 74(2), 395-410. Gu E. & Li L. (2020). Crippled community governance and suppressed scientific/professional communities: a critical assessment of failed early warning for the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5, 160-177. Guzman A. T. (2011). The Consent Problem in International Law. UC Berkeley: Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, 1-63. Hambro E. (1948). The Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. Transactions of the Grotius Society, 34, 127-140. Hoffman S. J. (2014). Making the International Health Regulations Matter: Promoting Compliance Through Effective Dispute Resolution. in Routledge Handbook on Global Health Security 239-251. Huang Y. (2004). The SARS Epidemic and Its Aftermath in China: A Political Perspective, in Learning from SARS: Preparing for the Next Disease Outbreak -- Workshop Summary 116-136. Kulesza J. (2022). Peaceful Settlement of Interstate Online Disputes. Laws, 11(3), 1-13. Kusumawati E. D. (2021). States Responsibility vs Domestic Control Measures of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of the Current International Health Regulation (IHR) Regime. Advances in Social Science. Education and Humanities Research, 592, 35-43. Lanovoy V. (2021). Causation in the Law of State Responsibility. British Yearbook of International Law, 90, 1-110. Lester R. (1987). The "Substantial Factor Test" for Causation: Juedeman v. Montana Deaconess Medical Center. Montana Law Review, 48, 391-400. Li Q. et al. (2020). Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382(13), 1199-1207. Lin C. F. (2020). COVID-19 and the Institutional Resilience of the IHR (2005): Time for a Dispute Settlement Redesign?. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1), 269-290. McDonald N. (2019). The Role of Due Diligence in International Law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(4), 1041-1054. Mulaj V. (2018). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Arbitration in Relation to the Regular Courts in Kosovo. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 59(1), 118-133. Oduntan G. (2019). Access to justice in international courts for indigent states, persons and peoples. Indian Journal of International Law, 58, 265-325. Olabuenaga P. A. (2023). G.A. Res. 76/262 on a Standing Mandate for a General Assembly debate when a Veto is Cast in the Security Council (U.N.). International Legal Materials, 62(2), 284-288. Ottersen T., Hoffman S. J., & Groux G. (2016). Ebola Again Shows the International Health Regulations are Broken: What Can Be Done Differently for the Next Epidemic?. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 42(2-3), 356-392. Paparinskis M. (2020). Covid-19 Claims and the Law of International Responsibility. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 11(2), 311-330. Plakokefalos I. (2015). Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity. European Journal of International Law, 26(2), 471-492. Paine J. & Sheargold E. (2023), A Climate Change Carve-Out for Investment Treaties. Journal of International Economic Law, 26, 285-304. Rao P. S. (2002). Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities- A sub-topic of international liability. Environmental Policy and Law, 32(1), 27-28. Roberts D. L., Rossman J. S. & Jarić I. (2021). Dating first cases of COVID-19. PLOS Pathogens, 17(6), 1-10. Rosenne S. (2009). Capacity to Litigate in the International Court of Justice: Reflections on Yugoslavia in the Court. British Yearbook of International Law, 80(1), 217-243. Samuel K. L. (2018). The Legal Character of Due Diligence: Standards, Obligations, or Both?. Central Asian Yearbook of International Law, 1, 1-51. Simma B. (2012). The International Court of Justice and Scientific Expertise. American Society of International Law, 106, 230-233. Smith A. W. & Osman S. (2020). Public health emergencies of international concern: a historic overview. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(8), 1-13. Sohn M. et al. (2021). The problems of International Health Regulations (IHR) in the process of responding to COVID-19 and improvement measures to improve its effectiveness. Journal of Global Health Science, 3(2), 1-7. Steensma D. P. & Kyle R. A. (2022). Dr Li Wenliang: Wuhan “Whistleblower” and Early COVID-19 Victim. Stamp Vignette on Medical Science, 97(7), 1409-1410. Suter K. (2004). The Successes and Limitations of International Law and the International Court of Justice,.Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 20(4), 344-354. Tanzi A. (1995). Problems of Enforcement of Decisions of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the United Nations. European Journal of International Law, 6(4), 539-572. Terris M. (1993). Toward a New, "Independent-Cooperative Model" of International Health. Journal of Public Health Policy, 14(3), 265-275. Tian H. et al. (2020). An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science, 368, 638-642. Tignino M., Bréthaut C. (2020). The Role of International Case Law in Implementing the Obligation not to Cause Significant Harm. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20, 631-648. Wiktorowicz L. M. et al. (2021). A Pandemic Treaty, Revised International Health Regulations, or Both?. Globalization and Health, 17, 1-4. Yee S. (2001). Forum Prorogatum and the Advisory Proceedings of the International Court. American Journal of International Law, 95(2), 381-385. Yee S. (2020). To Deal with a New Coronavirus Pandemic: Making Sense of the Lack of Any State Practice in Pursuing State Responsibility for Alleged Malfeasances in a Pandemic—Lex Specialis or Lex Generalis at Work?. Chinese Journal of International Law, 19(2), 237-252. 三、 案例 Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukr. v. Russ.). ICJ Judgement (2019). Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), ICJ Judgement (1997). Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (U.S. v. Iran), ICJ Judgement (1980). Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), ICJ Judgement (2015). Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), ICJ Judgment (2018). Factory at Chorzów (Merits) (Germany v. Poland), PCIJ Judgment (1928). LaGrand (Germany v. U.S.), ICJ Judgment (2001). Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, Request for Advisory Opinion (1970). Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Request for Advisory Opinion (2017). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion (1996). Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Advisory Opinion (1996). National Grid v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. UN 7949 Award (2008). Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.), ICJ Judgment (2010). Trail Smelter (U.S. v. Can.), 3 R.I.A.A (1941). Walter Fletcher Smith Claim (Cuba v. U.S.), 23 R.I.A.A (1929). 四、 網路文獻與資料 Arcari M. (2022). The future of the Articles on State Responsibility: A matter of form or of substance?. Questions of International Law. http://www.qil-qdi.org/the-future-of-the-articles-on-state-responsibility-a-matter-of-form-or-of-substance/. Bavishi R. & Barakat S. (2012). Procedural Issues related to the ICJ’s advisory jurisdiction. Legal Response Initiative. https://legalresponse.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BP41E-Briefing-Paper-The-ICJ-Advisory-Opinion-Procedure-11-June-2012.pdf. Chaturvedi, I. (2020). China’s State Responsibility for the Global Spread of COVID-19: An International Law Perspective. ORF Issue Brief. https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ORF_Issue-Brief_373-China-State-Responsibility.pdf. Coco, A. (2020). Talita de Souza Dias, Part I: Due Diligence and COVID-19: States’ Duties to Prevent and Halt the Coronavirus Outbreak, EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/part-i-due-diligence-and-covid-19-states-duties-to-prevent-and-halt-the-coronavirus-outbreak/. Cross, G. (2019). Death in the Air: Revisiting the 2001Anthrax Mailings and the Amerithrax Investigation, War on the Rocks, https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/death-in-the-air-revisiting-the-2001-anthrax-mailings-and-the-amerithrax-investigation/. Crawford, J. (2012). Historical background and development of codification. Audiovisual Library of International Law. https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/rsiwa/rsiwa.html. Creutz K. (2020). China’s Responsibility for the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Law Perspective. FIIA Working Paper. https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/wp115_chinas-responsibility-for-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf. Fidler, D. (2003). SARS and International Law, American Society of International Law, https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/8/issue/7/sars-and-international-law. French D. & Stephens T. (2014). ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law-First Report. International Law Association. https://www.ila-hq.org/en_GB/documents/first-report-washington-dc-2014. Ginsbach, K. F., Monahan J. T., & Gottschalk K. (2021). Beyond COVID-19: Reimagining the Role of International Health Regulations in The Global Health Law Landscape. Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20211027.605372/. Gopinath, G. (2020). The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression. IMF Blog. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/04/14/blog-weo-the-great-lockdown-worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression. Herdt S. D. (2020). A Reference to the ICJ for an Advisory Opinion over COVID-19 Pandemic. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-reference-to-the-icj-for-an-advisory-opinion-over-covid-19-pandemic/. International Court of Justice. Advisory Jurisdiction. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/advisory-jurisdiction. International Court of Justice. Basis of the Court’s jurisdiction. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/basis-of-jurisdiction. International Court of Justice. Contentious Jurisdiction. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/contentious-jurisdiction. International Court of Justice. Declarations recognizing the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/declarations. International Court of Justice. List of All Cases. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/list-of-all-cases. International Law Commission. (2023). Summaries of the Work of the International Law Commission- State Responsibility. https://legal.un.org/ilc/summaries/9_6.shtml#a3. Johnstone, I. et al. (2021). International Law and Pandemics: A Primer. The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. https://sites.tufts.edu/cilg/files/2021/09/Pandemics-and-International-Law-A-Primer.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2oy0inr3gODnSIQ40bK204QTNYNCRVVuVZ-UM6MZJBdi6fF36tnoaf6-A (2021). Koivurova T. (2012). Due Diligence. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. https://www.arcticcentre.org/loader.aspx?id=78182718-d0c9-4833-97b3-b69299e2f127. Ollino, A. (2020). Causality in the law of State responsibility: Considerations on the Congo v Uganda case, Questions of International Law. http://www.qil-qdi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/02_ICJ-War_reparations_OLLINO_FIN.pdf Ozturk, A. (2020). Covid-19: Just Disastrous or the Disaster Itself? Applying the ILC Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters to the Covid-19 Outbreak, American Society of International Law, https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/24/issue/6/covid-19-just-disastrous-or-disaster-itself-applying-ilc-articles#_edn10. Paddeu, F. ＆ Jephcott F. (2020). COVID-19 and Defences in the Law of State Responsibility: Part I, EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/covid-19-and-defences-in-the-law-of-state-responsibility-part-i/. Permanent Court of Arbitration [PCA]. (2022). Members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2023/02/695127f7-pca-400282-v16c-current_list_annex_1_members_of_the_court.pdf. Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2018). Duration and Cost of State-State Arbitration Proceedings. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/pca-_submission_-_duration_and_cost_-_20181024.pdf. Permanent Court of Arbitration. Members of the Court, https://pca-cpa.org/en/about/structure/members-of-the-court/. Sands C. (2020). China’s Communist Party Hid the Truth about COVID-19. U.S. Embassy & Consulate in the Kingdom of Denmark. https://dk.usembassy.gov/chinas-communist-party-hid-the-truth-about-covid-19/. Sirleaf M. (2020). COVID-19 and Allocating Responsibility for Pandemics. Jurist. https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/03/matiangai-sirleaf-responsibility-for-pandemics/. Tzeng P. (2020). Taking China to the International Court of Justice over COVID-19. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/taking-china-to-the-international-court-of-justice-over-covid-19/. United Nations. About Us. https://www.un.org/en/about-us. Videler M. (2021) ICJ Jurisdiction over Obligations to Share Information with the WHO. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/icj-jurisdiction-over-obligations-to-share-information-with-who/. World Bank. (2020). Global Economic Prospects. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/254aba87-dfeb-5b5c-b00a-727d04ade275/content. World Health Organization & World Bank. (2022). Analysis of Pandemic Preparedness and Response (PPR) architecture, financing needs, gaps and mechanisms. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/5760109c4db174ff90a8dfa7d025644a-0290032022/original/G20-Gaps-in-PPR-Financing-Mechanisms-WHO-and-WB-pdf.pdf. World Health Organization, UNICEF, & IFRC. (2020). Key Messages and Actions for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in Schools. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/key-messages-and-actions-for-covid-19-prevention-and-control-in-schools-march-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=baf81d52_4. World Health Organization. (2004). Review and approval of proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations: relations with other international instruments. https://apps.who.int/gb/IHR/pdf_files/IHR_IGWG_ID1-en.pdf. World Health Organization. (2006). National IHR Focal Point Guide- Designation/establishment of National IHR Focal Points , https://reurl.cc/5pGDdq. World Health Organization. (2019). Emergencies: International health regulations and emergency committees. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/emergencies-international-health-regulations-and-emergency-committees. World Health Organization. (2020). Article-by-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) submitted in accordance with decision WHA75(9), https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf. World Health Organization. (2020). Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331422. World Health Organization. (2020). Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331422. World Health Organization. (2020). Pneumonia of unknown cause – China. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON229. World Health Organization. (2020). Statement on the first meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). https://www.who.int/news/item/23-01-2020-statement-on-the-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov). World Health Organization. (2020). Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov). World Health Organization. (2020). Timeline of WHO’s Response to COVID-19. https://www.paho.org/en/news/2-7-2020-timeline-whos-response-covid-19. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. World Health Organization. International Health Regulations-overview, https://www.who.int/health-topics/international-health-regulations#tab=tab_1. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87970 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | COVID-19 於 2019 年年底爆發，自 2020 年起，「如何向疾病發源國咎責」 成為國際間備受討論的議題。事實上，綜觀國家間齊心抗疫之經驗，COVID-19 並非各國首次面對嚴重傳染性疾病，「對疾病發源國違反國際義務之咎責問題」 亦非初次浮上檯面。然即便過去此議題曾被提出，後卻因疾病的趨緩或消逝而 討論不再。是故，「疾病發源國之國際義務和咎責方式」長期受到忽略，直至近 年因 COVID-19 為世界帶來前所未有的不便，此議題方再度受到重視。
由於疾病發源國為防疫的重要角色，若國際上對其咎責機制不完善，難免遭遇未來疾病發源國重蹈覆轍，違背國際義務而錯失抑制疾病擴散機會之風險。為分析目前國際上對疾病發源國之咎責可能性，本論文首先檢視現行國際法下 疾病發源國之義務，後討論對其咎責之可能法律基礎與管道，同時比較採行各管道可能面臨的優劣勢，最後再針對本次 COVID-19 疫情，探討對疾病發源國 之咎責可能性，並分析國家於咎責過程中將面臨的困難。 本文的結論包括以下：一、在防疫一事上，「事前監督」和「事後咎責」不應偏廢，然由目前 WHO 修法方向以觀，仍僅強化監督機制，而忽略事後檢討、矯正之重要性；二、「對疾病發源國咎責」之議題熱度須繼續維持，方有利於未來的改革與實踐；三、現行國際上對疾病發源國之咎責機制不全，本文提出修改建議；四、由於過去未曾有向疾病發源國咎責之例，故國家利用現有管道為任何嘗試，皆極具參考價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | After the outbreak of COVID-19, the discussion about “state accountability for pandemic” has become popular since 2020. In fact, this issue has been raised for several times when the pandemics happened among countries. However, with the pandemics under control, the related discussions faded away. As a result, the question “when the state where pandemic originated (pandemic-originated state) breaching its international obligations, what are the ways to hold it accountable?” remains unsolved.
But if the effective accountability system for pandemics does not exist, pandemic- originated state will not have enough motivation to comply with its obligations. In other words, states are all still under the risk of future pandemic raging arising from the pandemic-originated state breaking the rules. To explore this issue, this thesis firstly lists the international obligations that pandemic-originated state has under current international law. Second, it turns to analyze when states are going to hold pandemic- originated state accountable for breaching its obligations, what are the possible legal bases and forums for them to choose from. Third, it makes comparisons among different forums and points out the problems in the current mechanisms. Last, it goes back to COVID-19 and examines whether states can use the ways mentioned above to make China take on the responsibility for this global pandemic. In this thesis, four conclusions are drawn: First, to build a sound pandemic prevention system for the world, the supervision and the accountability systems should both be created. Second, the discussions and debates for this topic should be continued. It will help the innovations for the related regulations. Third, the current accountability systems for pandemic are still not effective enough, so the thesis submits its own proposal. Last, since there have been no previous cases for holding pandemic- originated state responsible, any new try can be invaluable. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-01T16:09:07Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-01T16:09:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
謝辭 II 摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 一、 COVID-19的嚴重性 1 二、 疾病咎責為當前重要議題 1 三、 國際上尚未有向疾病發源國咎責之實踐 2 第二節 研究範圍 3 第三節 研究方法 4 第四節 研究架構 4 第二章 現行國際法課予疾病發源國之義務 6 第一節 引言 6 第二節 賦予疾病發源國義務之相關國際規範 7 一、 IHR（2005） 7 二、 《世界衛生組織憲章》 15 三、 《關於預防危險活動的越境損害條款》 17 四、 《關於災難時的人員保護條款》 20 五、 合理注意義務 23 第三節 小結 29 一、 偵測和評估義務 29 二、 通知、協商和資訊共享義務 30 三、 採取適當措施義務 30 四、 國際合作義務 31 第三章 對疾病發源國咎責之法律基礎與方法 32 第一節 引言 32 第二節 疫情下對疾病發源國咎責之法律基礎 32 一、 IHR（2005） 32 二、 《世界衛生組織憲章》 34 三、 《關於預防危險活動的越境損害條款》 37 四、 《關於災難時的人員保護條款》 40 五、 《國家對國際不法行為的責任條款》 41 第三節 小結與觀察 71 一、 咎責基礎之爭端解決機制整理 71 二、 咎責基礎和各爭端解決機制之觀察 72 第四章 對疾病發源國咎責之管道與比較分析 74 第一節 引言 74 第二節 國家可能得採取之咎責管道與比較 74 一、 非裁判性之爭端解決方法 75 二、 仲裁 76 三、 國際法院 92 第三節 小結與建議 112 一、 疫情下國際咎責失敗之原因 112 二、 可能突破僵局的方式 118 第五章 COVID-19下對疾病發源國之國際咎責 129 第一節 引言 129 第二節 COVID-19事發經過 129 第三節 中國可能違反的國際義務和主張依據 135 一、 疾病偵測和通報義務 135 二、 資訊分享義務 137 三、 採取適當措施義務 141 四、 國際合作義務 142 第四節 合適的咎責方式分析 143 一、 咎責依據和咎責管道 143 二、 咎責困難之處 148 第五節 小結 150 第六章 結論 152 參考學術文獻 155 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 疾病發源國責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際公法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際衛生法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 疾病咎責法律基礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際咎責管道 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | the international obligations for pandemic-originated state | en |
| dc.subject | international law | en |
| dc.subject | international health law | en |
| dc.subject | the accountability forums under international law | en |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | the legal responsibility for pandemic-originated state | en |
| dc.title | 對疾病發源國的國際咎責——以 COVID-19 為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | State Accountability for Pandemic: A Case Study of COVID-19 | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林勤富;李柏翰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ching-Fu Lin;Po-Han Lee | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國際公法,國際衛生法,疾病發源國責任,疾病咎責法律基礎,國際咎責管道,COVID-19, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | international law,international health law,the international obligations for pandemic-originated state,the legal responsibility for pandemic-originated state,the accountability forums under international law,COVID-19, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 165 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301152 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.9 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。