請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87935完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉康慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Helen K. Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李昱頡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Jie Li | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-31T16:24:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-29 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 官有垣、王仕圖，2000，《非營利組織之相關理論》。臺北市：亞太圖書出版社。
林淑馨，2013，《質性研究：理論與實務》。高雄：巨流圖書公司。 林淑馨，2017，《非營利組織概論》。高雄：巨流圖書公司。 王苡芸，2022，〈高雄市非營利幼兒園的辦學品質指標之建構與評估〉，國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。 李淑麗，2016，〈非營利幼兒園公私協力關係之研究〉，國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。 呂偉豪，2018，〈幼兒教育照顧之公私協力研究：以非營利幼兒園為中心〉，國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士論文。 吳鈺晴，2020，〈家長選擇非營利幼兒園之調查與分析研究 －以高雄市地區為例〉，國立嘉義大學教幼兒育學系研究所碩士論文。 邱志鵬、劉兆隆、謝友文，2012，〈我國幼兒托育制度之研究〉，行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告(RDEC-RES-100-015)。台北市：台北市立教育大學。 林俊瑩、張凱程、林志豪，2020，〈臺灣地區非營利幼兒園的政策效果與侷限〉，《台北市立大學學報》， 第53期第1卷，頁 23-42。 林培祺，2021，〈非營利幼兒園實施現況之研究〉，明道大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。 洪福財，2000，〈臺灣地區幼兒教育歷史發展及未來義務化政策之探討〉，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。 胡美蘭，2006，〈台北縣委託民營幼稚園之個案研究〉，國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文。 姜欣怡，2014，〈非營利幼兒園實施辦法之研究〉，臺北市立大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文。 施又瑀，2018，〈公私協力模式推動非營利幼兒園之探究〉，《台灣教育評論月刊》， 第7期第7卷，頁 20-28。 姜姿安，2019，〈我國幼兒教育券政策之研究－從政策變遷觀點〉，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。 高永興，2015，〈社會企業之制度選擇與價值呈現〉，國立暨南大學社會政 策暨社會工作學系博士論文。 徐千惠，2018，〈從公共政策之角度思考非營利幼兒園的設立與營運〉，《台灣教育評論月刊》， 第7期第7卷，頁 16-19。 張雅婷，2007，〈公私協力的挑戰與曙光：臺北市公設民營吉利托兒所經營歷程之個案研究〉，國立政治大學幼兒教育所碩士論文。 張惠雯，2021，〈非營利幼兒園營運的挑戰與因應之研究〉，國立暨南大學非營利組織經營管理碩士學位學程在職專班碩士論文。 教育部，2021，〈我國少子女化計畫核定本〉，取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=1F066099DDDA393B 麻恩揚，2022，〈家長選擇非營利幼兒園之因素探討─以嘉義地區為例〉，國立嘉義大學教幼兒育學系研究所碩士論文。 黃秀琴，2014，〈非營利幼兒園公私協力關係之研究—以花蓮縣為例〉，東華大學公共行政學系碩士論文。 萬文隆，2018，〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉，《生活科技教育月刊》， 第37期第4卷。 楊宛育，2017，〈地方型公私協力模式之探討－以非營利幼兒園為例〉，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。 歐姿秀、陳淑琦、李淑惠，2013，〈非營利幼兒園應有之核心價值〉，《國教新知》，第60卷第4期，頁49-58。 劉怡君，2013，〈非營利組織領導者的公共服務動機研究:以台南閱讀起步 （Bookstart）走為例〉，國立臺南大學行政管理學系碩士論文。 劉芸英，2016，〈非營利幼兒園政策執行之評估-以台北市、新北市為例〉，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程論文。 戰寶華、陳惠珍，2015，〈非營利幼兒園之經濟價值與社會效益〉，《師友月刊》， 第580 期，頁 10-14。 繆敏志、林少龍，2000，企業外在環境、組織變項與組織變革策略關係之研究，《亞太管理評論》，5(4): 487-501。 Arrow, K.J., 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53, 941–973. Andreasen, A. R., & Kotler, P. (2006). Strategic Marketing for Non-Profit Organizations. (7th ed.) Prentice Hall. Bays, C. W. (1977). Case-mix differences between non-profit and for-profit hospitals. Inquiry, pp. 17-21. Buckner, J. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791. Booth, A., Higgins, D., & Cornelius, R. (1989). Community influences on funds raised by human service volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 81-82. Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, non-profit and voluntary sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63, 391-415. Bielefeld, W. (2000). Metropolitan nonprofit sectors: Findings from the NCCS data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 298-314. Caplow, T., & Forman, R. (1950). Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous community. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 357-366. Cohen, G. (1982). Community cohesion and space planning. In R. Frankenberg (Ed.), Custom and conflict in British society (pp. 258-285). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. Chambers, C. A. (1985). The historical role of the voluntary sector in human service delivery in urban America. In G. A. Tobin (Ed.), Social planning and human service delivery in the voluntary sector (pp. 3-27). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1990). Do higher property-tax rates increase the market share of nonprofit hospitals? National Tax Journal, 43, 175-187. Clarke, L., & Estes, C. L. (1992). Sociological and economic theories of markets and nonprofits: Evidence from home health organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 945-969. Cnaan, R. A., Kasternakis, A., & Wineburg, R. J. (1993). Religious people, religious congregations, and volunteerism in human services: Is there a link? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(1), 33-51. Claxton, G., Feder, J., Shactman, D., & Altman, S. (1997). Public policy issues in nonprofit conversions: an overview. Health Affairs, 16(2), 9-28. Corbin, J. J. (1999). "A Study of Factors Influencing the Growth of Nonprofits in Social Services." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3): 296-314. Child, C., Witesman, E. N.& Braudt, D. B. (2015). Sector choice: How fair trade entrepreneurs choose between nonprofit and for-profit forms. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 832-851. Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 43-54). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Desai, K. R., Young, G. J.& Lukas, C. (1998). Hospital Conversions from for-Profit to Nonprofit Status: The other Side of the Story. Medical Care Research and Review, 50(3), 298-308. Ferris, J. M., & Graddy, E. A. (1999). Structural changes in the hospital industry, charity care, and the nonprofit role in health care. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 18-31. Forder, J. (2000). Mental health: Market power and governance. Journal of Health Economics, 19, 877-905. Goodspeed, T. J., & Kenyon, D. A. (1993). The nonprofit sector’s capital constraint: Does it provide a rationale for the tax-exemption granted to nonprofit firms? Public Finance Quarterly, 21, 415- 433. Gulley, O. D., & Santerre, R. E. (1993). The effect of tax-exemption on the market share of nonprofit hospitals. National Tax Journal, 46, 477-486. Goddeeris, J. H., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Conversion from nonprofit to for‐profit legal status: Why does it happen and should anyone care? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2), 215-233. Guterbock, T. M., & Fries, J. C. (1997). Maintaining America’s social fabric: The AARP Survey of Civic Involvement. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons. Gamm, G., & Putnam, R. (1999). The growth of voluntary associations in America, 1840-1940. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29, 511-557. Gronbjerg, K. A. and L. Paarlberg (2001). "Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Nonprofit Sector: Theory and Preliminary Findings." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(4): 684. Grabowski, D. C., & Hirth, R. A. (2003). Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 1-22. Gronbjerg, Kirsten, Liu, Helen K. and Pollak , Thomas H. (2010). “Incorporated but Not IRSRegistered: Exploring the (Dark) Grey Fringes of the Nonprofit Universe.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. vol. 39 no. 5, Pages 925–945. Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of non-profit enterprise. Yale Law Journal 89, 835–901. Hansmann, H. (1987). The effect of tax exemption and other factors on the market share of nonprofit versus for-profit firms. National Tax Journal, 40(1), 71-82. Hirth, R. A. (1999). Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. Journal of health economics, 18(2), 219-240. Harrington, C. , Woolhandler, S. , Mullan, J. , Carrillo, H. , & Himmelstein, D. U. (2002). Does investor-ownership of nursing homes compromise the quality of care? International Journal of Health Services, 32, 315-325. Hawes, C., Phillips, C.D., (1986). The changing structure of the nursing home industry and the impact of ownership on quality, cost and access. In: Gray, B.H. (Ed.), For-profit Enterprise in Health Care. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 492–541. James, E. (1989). Preface. In E. James (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy (pp. ix-xii). New York: Oxford University Press. James, E & W. W. Powell. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In The nonprofit sector : a research handbook /(pp. 43–54). Stanford University Press. Kushman, J. E. (1979). A three-sector model of day care services. Journal of Human Resources, pp. 543-562. Kramer,R.M. (1981). Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley: University of California Press. Kim, T.& Rhee, M. (2017). Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change: Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance. Journal of Management, 43(2): 716-741. Lincoln, J. R. (1977). The urban distribution of voluntary organizations. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 472-480. Lee, A. J. , & Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). Collective goods and the voluntary sector: The case of the hospital industry. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), The voluntary nonprofit sector (pp. 77-100). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Legorreta, J. M.& Young, G. J. (1985). Why organizations turn nonprofit: Lessons from case studies. In Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy (pp. 196-204). New York: Oxford University Press. Lowery, D. (1998). Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market Failure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2): 137-172. Marwell, N. P., & McInerney, P. B. (2005). The nonprofit/for-profit continuum: Theorizing the dynamics of mixed-form markets. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 34(1), 7-28. Mann, G. A. (2006). A Motive To Serve: Public Service Motivation in Human Resource Management and the Role of PSM in the Nonprofit Sector. Public personnel management, 35(1): 33-48. Morley, J. (2006). For-Profit and Nonprofit Charter Schools: An Agency Costs Approach. The Yale Law Journal, 115(7), 1782-1821. O'Brien, J., Saxberg, B. O., & Smith, H. L. (1983). For-profit or not-for-profit nursing homes: Does it matter?. The Gerontologist, 23(4), 341-348. Piper, W. E. , Marrache, M. , Lacroix, R. , Richardsen, A. M. , & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36(2), 93-108. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Randall, A. (1983). The Problem of Market Failure. Natural Resources Journal, 23(1), 131–148. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Rosenau, P. V. , & Linder, S. H. (2003). Two decades of research comparing for-profit and nonprofit health provider performance in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 219-241. Schlesinger, M., Marmor, T. R., & Smithey, R. (1987). Nonprofit and for-profit medical care: Shifting roles and implications for health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 12, 427-457. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-Nonprofit Relation in the Modern Welfare State. The John Hopkins University Press. Salamon, L.M. (1999). The Nonprofit Sector at a Crossroads: The Case of America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 10, 5–23. Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94, 527-546. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sarta, A., Durand, R.& Vergne, J. (2021). Organizational Adaptation. Journal of Management, January Review Issue. Tuckman, H. P. (1998). Competition, commercialization, and the evolution of nonprofit organizational structures. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 175-194. Wilensky, H. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality: Structural and ideological roots of public expenditures (Vol. 140). Univ of California Press. Warren, D. I. (1975). Black neighborhoods: An assessment of community power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Wolch, J. R. , & Geiger, R. K. (1983). The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning, 15, 1067-1082. Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wolch, J. R. (1990).The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. Washington, DC: The Foundation Center. Wuthnow, R., & Hodgkinson, V. A. (1990). Faith and philanthropy in America: Exploring the role of religion in America's voluntary sector. Jossey-Bass. Wolf, T. (1999). Managing an Organization in the Twenty Century. New York: Simon & Schuster. Young, D. R. (1985). Entrepreneurship and the behavior of nonprofit organizations: Elements of a theory. In Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy (pp. 161-184). New York: Oxford University Press. Zakour, M. J., & Gillespie, D. F. (1998). Effects of organizational type and localism on volunteerism and resource sharing during disasters. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 49-65. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87935 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 非營利幼兒園政策的推動下，改變了原先幼兒學前教育市場上長期以公 立、私營幼兒園的二分法，不僅提供家長有第三種選擇外，對於幼兒學前教育 的「供給方」也產生不同的轉變。本研究旨探究幼兒教育市場中的服務供給端 選擇為非營利部門之影響因素，並透過文獻回顧建構出一包含個人、組織及環 境三層面之影響因素架構。在研究方法上，採用個案研究法與深度訪談法，呈 現三個案選擇過程中的動態性變化以及在實際幼兒教育場域中所獨具有的脈絡 以及內涵。
研究結果發現個人、組織與環境面向之因素皆有在過程中被提及，其中組 織層面的討論尤為豐沛，也顯示出此架構以及既有的理論與文獻或多或少都能 夠吻合並作為解釋選擇為非營利幼兒園之決定;另外，不同層面間個因素也具 有相互影響與連動的特性，而非僅憑單一因素或層面而為之。值此，本研究之 貢獻在於呈現一清楚之輪廓，除了提供幼兒學前教育的實務者在選擇以非營利 經營時所需要考量的因素與關鍵外，也透過三個案之完整歷程瞭解非營利幼兒 園經營所可能預期的困難與阻礙。另一方面，對於政策制定者而言，也得以反 思並重視幼兒學前教育之供給端在個層面所關注的重點，以及當前幼兒學前教 育市場中所存在的困境，作為日後決策之考量與借鑑。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Under the promotion of non-profit kindergarten policies, the traditional dichotomy of public and private kindergartens in the preschool education market has been transformed. Not only does it provide parents with a third option, but it also brings about changes for the "supply side" of preschool education. This study aims to explore the factors influencing the choice of non-profit sector in the service supply side of the early childhood education market and construct a framework that includes three dimensions: individual, organizational, and environmental factors through literature review. In terms of research methods, a case study approach and in-depth interviews were conducted to illustrate the dynamic changes in the three cases and the unique context and content in actual early childhood education settings.
The research findings indicate that factors from the individual, organizational, and environmental dimensions were mentioned throughout the process, with a particularly rich discussion on the organizational level. This suggests that the constructed framework and existing theories and literature can more or less align and serve as an explanation for the decision to choose non-profit kindergartens. Furthermore, the factors from different dimensions also have interactive and interconnected characteristics, rather than being solely determined by a single factor or dimension. Therefore, this study contributes by presenting a clear outline. It not only provides practitioners in early childhood education with the factors and key considerations to be taken into account when choosing non-profit operations but also offers an understanding of the anticipated difficulties and obstacles in operating non-profit kindergartens through the complete processes of the three cases. On the other hand, for policymakers, it provides an opportunity for reflection and emphasizes the focus of attention at the individual level on the supply side of preschool education, as well as the challenges present in the current preschool education market, serving as considerations and references for future decision-making. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-31T16:24:29Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-31T16:24:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 政策背景 6 第二節 非營利組織的基本概念與興起 15 第三節 非營利與營利部門間的競爭與動態發展 24 第四節 影響營利與非營利部門間選擇之相關理論與因素 30 第三章 研究設計與方法 44 第一節 研究架構 44 第二節 研究方法 44 第三節 研究個案與訪談對象的選擇 46 第四節 訪談題綱設計 49 第五節 研究流程 51 第四章 個案發現與分析 53 第一節 個案A—「非營利」的選擇 53 第二節 個案B—「非營利」的選擇 65 第三節 個案C—「非營利」的選擇 77 第四節 個案C—放棄非營利的特例 92 第五章 個案綜合討論與比較 102 第一節 個人層面之因素探討 102 第二節 組織層面之因素探討 106 第三節 環境層面之因素探討 110 第四節 三個案選擇非營利之異同 112 第六章 結論與建議 117 第一節 結論 117 第二節 幼兒學前教育參與者之建議： 重視「正當性」 122 第三節 提升幼兒學前教育品質之重要性 125 參考文獻 126 附錄 訪談大綱 136 圖目錄 圖3-1 研究流程圖 52 表目錄 表2-1 幼兒園類型與特色之比較 14 表2-2 文獻整理 34 表3-1 訪談對象一覽表 49 表3-2 訪談題綱 50 表5-1 三個案影響因素之異同比較 115 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 幼兒學前教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非營利幼兒園政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 部門選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非營利轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Nonprofit conversion | en |
| dc.subject | Sectoral choice | en |
| dc.subject | Non-profit kindergarten policy | en |
| dc.subject | Preschool education | en |
| dc.title | 探討非營利部門選擇之影響因素—以我國幼兒學前教育為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Factors Affecting the Nonprofit Choice in the Preschool Education: A Case Study in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 涂瑞德;蔡錦昌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ruey-Der Twu;Chin-Chang Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 部門選擇,非營利轉型,非營利幼兒園政策,幼兒學前教育, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sectoral choice,Nonprofit conversion,Non-profit kindergarten policy,Preschool education, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 137 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301204 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 3.38 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。