請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87804
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉啟群 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-Chun Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳芷晴 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Ching Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T16:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-05-15 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 23(1), 69-87.
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 22(2), 17-32. Agrawal, A., & Chadha, S. (2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371-406. Bédard, J., & Gendron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the financial reporting system: can audit committees deliver?. International journal of auditing, 14(2), 174-210. Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Larson, C. R. (2003). Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 285-319. Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2009). US managers' use of ‘pro forma’adjustments to meet strategic earnings targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3‐4), 297-326. Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J. T., & Whipple, B. C. (2018). Non‐GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(3-4), 259-294. Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J. T., & Whipple, B. C. (2021). Non‐GAAP earnings: A consistency and comparability crisis?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1712-1747. Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. (1999). Report and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. The Business Lawyer, 1067-1095. Bowen, R. M., Davis, A. K., & Matsumoto, D. A. (2005). Emphasis on pro forma versus GAAP earnings in quarterly press releases: Determinants, SEC intervention, and market reactions. The accounting review, 80(4), 1011-1038. Bricker, W. R. (2016). Remarks before the 2016 Baruch College Financial Reporting Conference. speech at New York on May, 5. Bricker, W. R. (2018). Remarks before the 2018 Baruch College Financial Reporting Conference: “Working Together to Advance Financial Reporting”. speech at New York on May, 3. Cascino, S., & Gassen, J. (2015). What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption?. Review of Accounting Studies, 20, 242-282. Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2016a). Questions on Non-GAAP measures: A tool for audit committees. https://www.thecaq.org/Questions-Non-GAAP-Measures-Tool-Audit-Committees/ Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2016b). The Audit Committee of the Future. https://www.thecaq.org/audit-committee-future/ Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2018). Non-GAAP measures: A roadmap for audit committees. https://www.thecaq.org/nongaap-measures-roadmap-audit-committees/ Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2020). The Role of Auditors in Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators: Present and Future. https://www.thecaq.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020_09_caq-role-of-the-auditor-Non-GAAP-and-KPIs.pdf Clayton, J., Teotia, S., & Hinman, M. (2019). Statement on role of audit committees in financial reporting and key reminders regarding oversight responsibilities. Public Statement of the Chairman of the SEC and published by the Securities and Exchange Commission, 1. Cohen, J. R., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2014). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 243-273. De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting research, 49(4), 895-931. DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors?. Journal of accounting research, 43(2), 153-193. DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial‐reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members' judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31-47. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature, 21, 38. Dhole, S., Liu, L., Lobo, G. J., & Mishra, S. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1), 106800. Dionne, G. and Triki, T. (2005). Risk Management and Corporate Governance: The Importance of Independence and Financial Knowledge for the Board and the Audit Committee. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 22, 247-277. Endrawes, M., Feng, Z., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2020). Audit committee characteristics and financial statement comparability. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 2361-2395. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8. Financial Accounting Foundation. Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M. L., & Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 605-633. Ghafran, C., & O'Sullivan, N. (2013). The governance role of audit committees: Reviewing a decade of evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 381-407. Guggenmos, R. D., Rennekamp, K., Rupar, K., & Wang, S. (2022). The relationship between non‐GAAP earnings and aggressive estimates in reported GAAP numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(5), 1915-1945. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2019a). Exposure Draft General Presentation and Disclosures. https://cdn.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/primary-financial-statements/exposure-draft/ed-general-presentation-disclosures.pdf International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2019b, December 17). IASB proposes to require comparable profit subtotals and bring greater transparency to ‘Non-GAAP’ measures. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2019/12/iasb-proposes-to-bring-greater-transparency-to-Non-GAAP-measures/ Kabureck, G. R. (2017). Accounting for Non-GAAP earnings measures. Compliance Week. Kent, P., & Stewart, J. (2008). Corporate governance and disclosures on the transition to international financial reporting standards. Accounting & Finance, 48(4), 649-671. Krishnan, G V., & Visvanathan, G. (2010). Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors’ Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–857. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The accounting review, 80(2), 649-675. Krishnan, J., Wen, Y., & Zhao, W. (2011). Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial reporting quality. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 2099-2130. Lang, M. H., Maffett, M. G., & Owens, E. (2010). Earnings comovement and accounting comparability: The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption. Lee, C. H. (2022). Non‐generally accepted accounting principles disclosures and audit committee chairs’ external directorships. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 49(1-2), 111-139. Lougee, B. A., & Marquardt, C. A. (2004). Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure: An empirical examination of “pro forma” earnings. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 769-795. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2011). Audit Committee Effectiveness: What Works Best, 4th edn. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2003). Final Rule: Disclosure Required by Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Release Nos. 33-8177; 34-47235. http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8177.htm Seetharaman, A., Wang, X., & Zhang, S. (2014). An empirical analysis of the effects of accounting expertise in audit committees on Non-GAAP earnings exclusions. Accounting Horizons, 28(1), 17-37. Szerwo, B. (2017). Audit committee Expertise: An examination of the post-SOX era (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington. Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2004). The corporate governance effects of audit committees. Journal of management and governance, 8, 305-332. Vafeas, N. (2005). Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings. Contemporary accounting research, 22(4), 1093-112. White, M. J. (2015). Keynote address at the 2015 AICPA National Conference: Maintaining high-quality, reliable financial reporting: A shared and weighty responsibility. speech at Washington DC on December, 9. Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of accounting and public policy, 26(3), 300-327. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87804 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來美國證券交易委員會(SEC)與審計品質中心(CAQ)不斷強調審計委員會對於Non-GAAP盈餘之監督職責。各公司在決定Non-GAAP盈餘調整項時可能有不一致之標準,使得Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性備受關注。本研究採用De Franco et al. (2011) 之可比較性衡量方法,將Endrawes et al. (2020) 對審計委員會與GAAP盈餘可比較性關係之研究延伸至Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性,探討審計委員會人數、審計委員會財務專家(採用SEC於2003年之定義)比例對GAAP盈餘與Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性之影響。
本研究以美國2003年至2020年資料為樣本,結果顯示,審計委員會人數對GAAP盈餘可比較性無影響,愈多人可加強監督力道,但也造成責任分散與運作無效率,此與Endrawes et al. (2020) 研究結果不同,因樣本組成不同;審計委員會財務專家可提升GAAP盈餘可比較性,因其懂得監督財務報導流程,此與Endrawes et al. (2020) 研究結果相近。審計委員會人數與審計委員會財務專家對Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性無總效果與直接影響,警示財務報表使用者須謹慎使用Non-GAAP盈餘。額外測試中主要發現:一、將可比較性之衡量改為僅關注前四大可比較公司之平均可比較性,審計委員會財務專家比例對Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性有直接與間接正向影響,可能係因審計委員會所關注之同業範圍並非整個產業。二、當審計委員會人數為八人(或以上)時,對GAAP盈餘可比較性有負向影響,對Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性有負向間接影響,代表過多成員將導致責任分散與流程不順暢。三、拆分子樣本期間後,審計委員會特質對以產業中位數衡量之Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性仍未有總效果與直接效果,顯示近期SEC與CAQ所表達的擔憂與建議仍未引起審計委員會對Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性之關注。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) in the United States have continuously emphasized the supervisory responsibilities of audit committees over Non-GAAP earnings. Companies may have inconsistent standards when deciding on Non-GAAP earnings adjustments, making the comparability of Non-GAAP earnings a matter of concern. This study uses the comparability measurement method of De Franco et al. (2011), and extends Endrawes et al. (2020)’s research, which focuses on the relationship between audit committees and GAAP earnings comparability, to Non-GAAP earnings comparability. This study examines the effects of the number of audit committee members and the proportion of financial experts (using the definition of SEC in 2003) on both GAAP and Non-GAAP earnings comparability.
Using data from 2003 to 2020 in the United States as the sample, the results show that the number of audit committee members does not affect GAAP earnings comparability. More members can strengthen supervision, but may lead to the dispersion of responsibilities and operational inefficiencies. This result is different from Endrawes et al. (2020) due to the different in sample compositions. The audit committee financial experts can improve GAAP earnings comparability because they understand how to supervise the financial reporting process. This result is similar to Endrawes et al. (2020). The number of audit committee members and audit committee financial experts have no total or direct effect on Non-GAAP earnings comparability, warning financial statement users to be cautious when using Non-GAAP earnings. In additional tests, this study found that: 1. Changing the measure of comparability to focus only on the average comparability of the top four comparable companies, the proportion of financial experts on the audit committee has a direct and indirect positive impact on Non-GAAP earnings comparability. This may be due to the scope of peers that the audit committee pays attention to is only part of the industry. 2. When the number of audit committee members is eight (or more), it will negatively impact GAAP earnings comparability and negatively indirect impact Non-GAAP earnings comparability, indicating that too many members will lead to dispersion of responsibility and the process that does not flow smoothly. 3. After splitting the sub-sample periods, the characteristics of the audit committee still have no total or direct effect on Non-GAAP earnings comparability measured by industry median, indicating that the concerns and recommendations expressed by the SEC and CAQ have not yet aroused the attention of audit committees to Non-GAAP earnings comparability. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-19T16:35:16Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-19T16:35:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究貢獻 5 第三節 研究架構 6 第二章 審計委員會規範、文獻回顧與假說發展 7 第一節 審計委員會規範 7 第二節 文獻回顧與假說發展 10 第三章 研究設計 17 第一節 樣本選取與資料處理 17 第二節 變數衡量 19 第三節 實證模型 22 第四章 實證結果與分析 23 第一節 敘述性統計 23 第二節 實證結果 28 第三節 額外測試 31 第五章 結論與建議 44 第一節 結論 44 第二節 研究限制 46 第三節 研究建議 47 參考文獻 48 附錄 54 附錄一、變數名稱彙總表 54 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 審計委員會特質對GAAP盈餘可比較性、Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on GAAP Earnings Comparability and Non-GAAP Earnings Comparability | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 尤琳蕙 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Lin-Hui Yu | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅勝議;李政勳;張窈菱;林純央 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Sheng-Yi Lo;Cheng-Hsun Lee;Yao-Lin Chang;Chun-Yang Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | GAAP盈餘,Non-GAAP盈餘,可比較性,審計委員會,審計委員會人數,審計委員會財務專家, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | GAAP earnings,Non-GAAP earnings,Comparability,Audit committee,Audit committee size,Audit committee financial expert, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300811 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-05-16 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.65 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。