請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87432
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林照真 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chao-Chen Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李宜萱 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Xuan Li | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-01T16:06:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-15 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 天下雜誌數位轉型報告(2018)。《天下雜誌》。取自:https://topic.cw.com.tw/media-digital-transformation/2018/decision.html
王思澄(2016)。〈讓大船轉彎:傳統雜誌發展新平台-以《天下雜誌》「獨立評論@天下」為例〉。《傳播、文化與政治》,3:95-130。 王郁倫、陳君毅(2019年7月17日)。〈開訂閱制第一槍,《蘋果日報》10天付費會員衝10萬人算成功嗎?〉,《數位時代》。取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/54041/appledaily-subscription-effect-media-future 左軒霆(2018)。《訂閱經濟:如何用最強商業模式,開啟全新服務商機》。臺北:天下雜誌。 臺灣媒體白皮書(2021)。《台北市媒體服務代理商協會》。取自 https://maataipei.org/download/2020%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8-2-2/ 李郁青(2009)。〈《壹週刊》外部性問題初探 -以司法院「法學資料檢索系統」中的案例看起〉。《新聞學研究》,98:193-244。 周佑政(2022年8月5日)。〈裴洛西訪台/藍綠現在才開始「抗中保台」選舉攻防 行得通嗎?〉,《聯合報數位版》。取自:https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/121160/6512400 林則宏(2022年8月4日)。〈兩棲登陸前奏!專家:共軍此次演練全面攻台 但國軍不是塑膠〉,《聯合新聞網》。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/10930/6513096 林照真(2009)。《收視率新聞學:臺灣電視新聞商品化》。臺北:聯經。 林照真(2015)。〈分析與批判傳統報紙在聚合現象中的角色:以臺灣四大報紙集團為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》,28:3-34。 林照真(2017)。《新聞,在轉捩點上:數位時代的新聞轉型與聚合》。臺北:聯經。 胡幼慧(1996)。《質性研究》。臺北:巨流。 洪哲政、蔡晉宇、侯俐安和陳政錄(2022年8月5日)。〈陸射11枚東風我戒備 日公布4枚飛越臺灣上空 一圖看飛彈落在哪〉,《聯合新聞網》。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/10930/6513787 夏春祥(1997)。〈質化內容分析與傳播研究〉,《新聞學研究》,54:141-166。 徐國淦、于俊傑、余鑑(2015)。〈變革之舞:傳統媒體《聯合報》導入關鍵績效考核的危機與轉機〉。《中華傳播學刊》,28:35-78。 徐豫(2020)。〈蘋果全面訂閱失敗後,平面媒體訂閱制何去何從?〉,《Medium》。取自:https://anitahsu-14600.medium.com/%E8%98%8B%E6%9E%9C%E5%85%A8%E9%9D%A2%E8%A8%82%E9%96%B1%E5%A4%B1%E6%95%97%E5%BE%8C-%E5%B9%B3%E9%9D%A2%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E8%A8%82%E9%96%B1%E5%88%B6%E4%BD%95%E5%8E%BB%E4%BD%95%E5%BE%9E-c704b0427d3d 陳信宏(2016)。《媒體失效的年代》。臺北:天下文化。(原書Jeff Jarvis. [2014] Geeks Bearing Gifts: Imagining New Futures for News. New York: Cuny Journalism Press.) 陳舜協(2022年8月4日)。〈裴洛西自遠方來 挑動美中台敏感神經 誰不亦樂乎? 〉,《聯合報數位版》。取自:https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/122367/6511234 區塊勢(無日期)。〈區塊勢-說人話的區塊鏈圖文〉。取自:https://blocktrend.substack.com/about。 張宏業(2020年10月4日)。〈黑道告別式處處眉角 誰先上香代表江湖地位高低〉,《聯合報數位版》。取自:https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/122876/4908788?from=vipudn__newest_cate 游美惠(2000)。〈內容分析、質化內容分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉,《調查研究》,8:5-42。 馮建三(1994)。《媒介經濟學》。臺北市:遠流。(原書Picard R. G. [1989] Media Economics: Concepts and Issues. London: SAGE Publications) 黃哲斌(2019)。《新聞不死。只是很喘:媒體數位轉型的中年危機》。臺北市:天下。 黃哲斌(2020)。〈《蘋果》收費為何失敗?〉,《Medium》。取自:https://puppydad.medium.com/%E8%98%8B%E6%9E%9C-%E6%94%B6%E8%B2%BB%E7%82%BA%E4%BD%95%E5%A4%B1%E6%95%97-ce743f74a51 黃哲斌(2020年12月3日)。〈微媒體崛起,你聽過「新聞直客潮」嗎?〉。《獨立評論@天下》。取自:https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/51/article/10212 程嘉文(2022年8月4日)。〈共軍射飛彈是傳說中的航母殺手?從這點分析「戰果」〉,《聯合報數位版》。取自:https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/122367/6513005 程嘉文(2022年8月5日)。〈兩岸避免擦槍走火 關鍵在第一線幹部能否自制〉,《聯合報數位版》。取自:https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/122367/6512897 辜樹仁(2022年8月3日)。〈第四次臺海危機,美國製造!裴洛西訪臺如何影響美中臺?〉,《天下雜誌》。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122236?from=search 報導者文化基金會(2018年8月1日)。〈關於《報導者》理念與價值〉。取自:https://www.twreporter.org/a/about-us-questions 新聞民主與平台議價論壇(2021)。〈Google、Facebook不公平競爭 學者呼籲政府立法課稅 要求合理賠償〉,《新聞民主與平台議價論壇》。取自:https://www.twjour.org/post/google%E3%80%81facebook%E4%B8%8D%E5%85%AC%E5%B9%B3%E7%AB%B6%E7%88%AD-%E5%AD%B8%E8%80%85%E5%91%BC%E7%B1%B2%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E7%AB%8B%E6%B3%95%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%85-%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E8%B3%A0%E5%84%9F 端傳媒(無日期)。〈用你選擇的媒體,決定你看見的世界。加入會員,支持獨立報導〉。取自:https://theinitium.com/subscription/offers/ 樂羽嘉(2022年8月3日)。〈裴洛西來臺 會影響股市多久?〉,《天下雜誌》。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122241?from=search 劉盈玓(2022年8月3日)。〈裴洛西訪臺,背後的「她」引起討論 口譯的工作是什麼?〉,《天下雜誌》。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122242?from=search 劉盈玓(2022年8月5日)。〈裴洛西訪臺行程結束,經濟學人:真正的危機可能正要開始〉,《天下雜誌》。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122276?from=search 戴伊筠(2010)。〈全球報業營運趨勢與產業現況〉,羅世宏、羅文輝編《新聞業的危機與重建:全球經驗與臺灣省思》,頁16-43。臺北市:允晨文化。 聯合新聞網(2022年8月4日)。〈【重磅快評】裴洛西替中俄打開機會之窗 臺灣麻煩大了〉,《聯合報新聞網》。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/122944/6511149 聯合新聞網(2022年8月6日)。〈整理包/陸出動哪些戰備武器?美日有來救嗎?中共軍演8大問一次解答〉,《聯合新聞網》。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/10930/6514292 關鍵評論網(2020年8月24日)。〈關鍵評論網訂閱制正式上線!有你的支持,我們可以一起走得更遠〉。取自:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/139756 羅彥傑(2018)。〈競爭或合作?:聚合服務使用新聞媒體內容的法律與實務分析〉。《資訊社會研究》,34:1-31。 鏡週刊(2021年10月11日)。〈【鐵粉召集令速報】1元就能訂閱!鏡週刊會員制10/5起啟動 年費會員再抽萬元大獎〉。取自:https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20211011mkt002/ 羅璿(2022年8月5日)。〈愈愛愈痛 中國網友怎麼看裴洛西訪臺?〉,《天下雜誌》。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122274?from=search 蘋果新聞網(2019年4月29日)。〈【訂閱新趨勢】守護《蘋果》靠你支持!CEO:我們會守住核心價值〉,《蘋果新聞網》。取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/international/20190429/46YCL6SQDDFPTZYKL7WL5XCETY/ 蘋果新聞網(2020年6月22日)。〈壹傳媒上年度虧16.1億 線上訂閱收入10.7億〉,《蘋果新聞網》。取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/property/20200622/4AOFNUSY5TM5ZH7GDQEUIAJI74/ 蘋果新聞網(2020年8月1日)。〈免費的《蘋果新聞網》回來了 即點即看即分享〉,《蘋果新聞網》。取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/international/20200801/LFCQVDMBKJWP3XHJD7PHLNKFYE/?utm_campaign=twad_social_appledaily.tw&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_content=link_post&fbclid=IwAR37CEQCIppxLd8WxlCB29n1e6qUVbAephOYfUIm6UBe1dHpbJ2Qad3WNDQ 蘋果新聞網(2021年5月17日)。〈再會 告別《蘋果日報》紙本 《蘋果新聞網》相見〉,《蘋果新聞網》。取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20210517/STWCJTZKXFCNZOGUJA4BEXUSJY/ 鐘維軒(2022年8月4日)。〈選戰打「抗中保台」牌? 陳時中:保護臺灣天經地義〉,《聯合報新聞網》。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/122682/6511195 蕭瑞麟、歐素華(2017)。〈資源流:聯合報系複合商業模式的形成〉。《組織與管理》,10(1):1-55。 Barthe, R. (1980). From work to text. In J. V. Harari (Eds.), Textual strategies: Perspectives in post-structuralist criticism (pp. 73-81). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bell, E.J., Owen, T., Brown, P.D., Hauka, C., & Rashidian, N. (2017). The platform press: how Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. New York, NY: Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Beller, J. (2006). The cinematic mode of production: Attention economy and the society of the spectacle. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press. Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, NY: Allyn and Bacon. Bueno, C. C. (2017). The attention economy: Labour, time and power in cognitive capitalism. New York, NY; Rowman & Littlefield International. Casero-Ripollés, A. & Izquierdo-Castillo, J. (2013). Between decline and a new online business model: The case of the Spanish newspaper industry. Journal of Media Business Studies. 10:63-78. Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (2002). The business of media: corporate media and the public interest. California, CA: Pine Forge Press. Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding media economics. London, UK: SAGE Publications. Fletcher, R. (2020). How and why people are paying for online news. Reuters Institute digital news report 2020. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/how-and-why-people-are-paying-for-online-news/ Forman, C. (2021, October 12). Solutions to America’s local journalism crisis: Consolidated literature review. The Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School. Retrieved from https://shorensteincenter.org/solutions-americas-local-journalism-crisis-consolidated-literature-review/ Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research. 24 (4): 343–373. Freedman, D. (2010). The political economy of the ‘new’ news environment. In Fenton, N. (Eds.), New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age (pp. 35-50). London, UK: SAGE Publications. Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society. social theory in the information age. New York, NY: Routledge. Fuchs, C. (2009). Information and communication technologies and society: a contribution to the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 69-87. Fuchs, C. (2015). Dallas Smythe and digital labor. In Routledge companion to labor and media. (pp. 51-62). New York, NY: Routledge. Hirsch, L., Draper, K. & Rosman, K. (2022.1.6). New York Times Co. to buy the Athletic for $550 million in cash. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/06/business/new-york-times-the-athletic.html Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. Huey, J., Nisenholtz, M., Sagan, P. (2013). What really happened to the news business: an oral history of the epic collision between journalism and digital technology, 1980 to the present, the Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved from https://www.digitalriptide.org/chapter-4-the-original-sin/ Jhally, S. & Livant, B. (1986). Watching as working: the valorization of audience consciousness. Journal of Communication, 36, 124-143. Levine, R. (2011.8.4). How the internet has all but destroyed the market for films, music and newspapers. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/aug/14/robert-levine-digital-free-ride Martin, M. & Dwyer, T. (2019). Sharing news online: Commendary cultures and social media news ecologies. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Media's risky paywall experiment: A timeline. (2015.1.12). The Week. Retrieved from https://theweek.com/articles/492336/medias-risky-paywall-experiment-timeline Murdock, G. (1978). Blindspots about western marxism: A reply to Dallas Smythe. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(2), 109-119. Napoli, P.M. (2003). Audience economics: media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Napoli, P. M. (2010). Audience evolution: new technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Newman, N. Fletcher, R Schulz, A, Andi S Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021.Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Nielsen, R. k., Gorwa, R., & de Cock Buning, M. (2019). Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Ovide, S. (2016.8.12). Google and Facebook killed free media with ad domination. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/201608-09/google-and-facebook-killed-free-media-with-ad-domination Peters, J. (2011.3.17). The Times announces digital subscription plan. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/business/media/18times.html Picard, R.G. (2014). New approaches to paid digital content. Digital News Report. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/essays/2014/new-approaches-to-paid-digital-content/ Picard R. G. & Lowe G. F. (2016). Questioning media management scholarship: four parables about how to better develop the field. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13(2):1-12. Pickard, V. & Williams, A. T. (2014). Salvation or folly? The promises and perils of digital paywalls. Digital Journalism. 2 (2): 195–213. Rapley, T. (2004). Interviews. In Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., Silverman, D. (Eds), Qualitative Research Practice. London, UK: Sage Publications. Rockwell, N. (2020.4.5). Looking back on four years at the Times. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/swlh/looking-back-on-four-years-at-the-times-e158ec3a5936 Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London, UK: Sage. Sjøvaag, H. (2015). Introducing the paywall: A case study of content changes in three online newspapers. Journalism Practice. Smythe, D. (1977). Communications: blindspot of western marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3), 1-27. Subscription performance benchmark report. (2021, spring). Piano. Retrieved from https://marketing.piano.io/l/897611/2021-04-15/42hsj#Conclusion Substack. (No date). A guide to paid subscriptions. Substack. Retrieved from https://substack.com/going-paid-guide?fbclid=IwAR3jqmfaOrfNUueEzzJmPdQsHQEnUmR0epiF9_QLSASSwbh9GnAXQ1kFxBQ#grow-paid-list Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy – promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Thompson, M. (2016). The challenging new economics of journalism, Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2016, 108-109. Terranova, T. (2012). Attention, Economy and the Brain. Culture Machine, 13. Turvill, W. (2021.4.9). US newspaper circulations: How Covid-19 hit sales of America's largest daily print titles. Press Gazette. Retrieved from https://pressgazette.co.uk/us-newspaper-circulations-covid-19/ Turvill, W. (2021.4.15). 100k club: Digital news subscriptions top 23m. Press Gazette. Retrieved from https://pressgazette.co.uk/digital-news-subscriptions-ranking-100k-club/ USA Today. (No date). Our reporting.Your stories. USA Today. Retrieved from https://cm.usatoday.com/specialoffer?gps-source=CPINTRSM&itm_medium=onsite&itm_campaign=2022LABORDAY&itm_source=digital&itm_term=outmark Webster, J.G. & Phalen, P.F. (1994). Victim, consumer, or commodity? Audience models in communication policy. In Ettema, J. S. & Whitney, D. C. (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. California, CA: Sage Publications. Webster, J. & Phalen, P. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Williams, A. T. (2016.2.29). Early digital subscription models. American Press Institute. Retrieved from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/early-digital-subscription-models/ Zhang, Y. & Wildemuth, B.M. (2005). Qualitative analysis of content. Human Brain Mapping, 30(7), 2197-2206. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87432 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 新聞媒體紙本收入下滑,加上跨國科技平台壟斷數位廣告市場,讓媒體必須尋求彌補營收缺口的收入來源,數位付費訂閱制成為媒體採行的新商業模式。
本論文以《天下雜誌》和《聯合報》為研究對象,以質化內容分析法比較兩間媒體付費和免費內容產品的差異,再透過深度訪談法,進一步理解媒體採用數位訂閱制的內容產品設計、數據應用和組織轉型,以釐清媒體如何在臺灣順利推動數位訂閱制。 本論文發現,《天下雜誌》採行軟付費牆類型中的計次付費牆,限制讀者免費閱讀的篇數,確保廣告和訂閱收入並存。《聯合報》則另設數位訂閱制專屬品牌《聯合報數位版》,並採取硬付費牆,讀者必須付費才能解鎖文章。其中,兩間媒體皆強調數位內容產品具「深度」的特性,且數據作為驅動產品的核心,可以協助內容產製、洞悉讀者、會員經營、檢視成效、以及廣告加值。 本論文指出,媒體發展數位訂閱制,須選擇適合的商業策略,包含付費牆的類型,並增設因應的數位職能和完善數位工程。媒體在設計數位訂閱制內容產品時,須理解目標讀者的需求,產製具差異性的內容。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Legacy news media have been struggling to make up for their revenue gaps since the decline in print revenue and the technology platforms have monopoly controls of the digital advertising market, forcing them to seek new business models like the digital subscription. Based on qualitative content analysis and in-depth interview, this thesis takes “Common Wealth Magazine” and “United Daily News” as the research subjects to analyze media's products designing, business decisions, data applications and organizational transformations to clarify how the digital subscription of media can thrive in Taiwan.
This thesis finds that Common Wealth Magazine adopts a kind of soft paywalls called the metered paywall which allows readers’ access to a set number of articles per month and ensures the co-existence of both advertising and subscriptive revenue. The United Daily News establishes an exclusive brand for digital subscription and adopts the hard paywall which requires a paid subscription to get access to articles. Both media emphasis that the content should be “in-depth”. Besides, the data plays an important role in digital subscription which helps the media to improve content production, customer relationship management, performance reviews, and value-added advertising. This thesis also argues that it is necessary for news media to choose suitable business strategies, building strong technology teams and cultivating digital mindsets. When it comes to designing content products, the media must understand the needs of their target readers and produce distinguished contents. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-06-01T16:06:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-06-01T16:06:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識:從蘋果新聞網說起 1 第二節 國外數位媒體付費訂閱現況 3 第三節 媒體數位轉型與平台 7 第四節 研究目的與研究問題 9 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 媒體的雙元產品市場 11 第二節 閱聽人商品 13 第三節 數位平台與注意力經濟 18 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 案例選擇 24 第二節 質化內容分析法 25 第三節 深度訪談法 26 第四章 研究發現 29 第一節 數位付費內容產品強調深度,類型多元 29 第二節 數位廣告遭大型科技公司壟斷,媒體嘗試數位訂閱制 36 第三節 《天下雜誌》推行計次付費牆,廣告和訂閱收入並存 40 第四節 《聯合報數位版》實施硬付費牆,鎖定品牌愛好者 44 第五節 數位付費訂閱制大量依賴讀者數據 48 第六節 數位訂閱制仰賴數位職能,說服記者成最大考驗 58 第五章 結論與建議 63 第一節 研究結論 64 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 68 參考資料 71 附錄 78 圖目錄 圖1、媒體雙元產品市場示意圖 12 圖2、《天下雜誌》數位內容產品 30 圖3、《聯合報數位版》數位內容產品 33 圖4、《天下雜誌》內容分層 41 圖5、《天下雜誌》以差別取價區分讀者類型 43 圖6、數位訂閱制的數據應用 49 表目錄 表 1、臺灣數位付費訂閱內容媒體 3 表 2、全球前10名數位訂閱戶媒體排名(單位:美金) 7 表 3、受訪者資料 27 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 數位媒體付費訂閱制初探— 以《天下雜誌》和《聯合報》為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Digital Media Subscriptions - The Cases of Common Wealth Magazine and United Daily News | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃靜蓉;陳炳宏 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jing-Rong Huang;Ping-Hung Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 數位訂閱制,天下雜誌,聯合報,雙元產品市場,付費牆, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | the digital subscription,Common Wealth Magazine,United Daily News,dual product market,paywall, | en |
dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300558 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-16 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf | 2.99 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。