請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87331完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王俊傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chun-Chieh Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 姚昕盈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Ying Yao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T17:06:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-06-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文
Gao Pei-Fang（2017年5月5日）。英、美、法、德、日五國如何發展智慧農產業。國立屏東科技大學智慧農產業中心。未來農產業4.0。取自：https://foa.npust.edu.tw/2017/05/05/ 日本特許廳（2014）。農產業関連技術の特許動向調查。 日本農林水產省（2016年11月）。智能實現農產業研究組第五次會議議事資料（スマート農產業の将来像）。取自：https://www.maff.go.jp/j/kanbo/smart/g_smart_nougyo/kenkyu_kai05.html。 行政院主計總處（2015）。農林漁牧普查。取自：https://www.stat.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=555&CtUnit=389&BaseDSD=7&mp=4 行政院主計總處（2022）。人力資源調查統計。取自：https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=17166&ctNode=517&mp=4 行政院主計總處（2013）。以農業普查探討全球化下我國農業生產力。取自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/31128153028USMXSNUA.pdf 行政院農委會（2017）。智慧農產業。取自：https://www.intelligentagri.com.tw/ 行政院農委會（2020）。推動改善農產業缺工。取自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=10429 行政院農委會。糧食自給率。取自：https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/indicator/Indicator.aspx 吳惠卿（2015）。現行農產業科技管理人才培育問題之我見。農產業試驗所技術服務季刊，104。 呂秀英（2005年12月）。臺灣農產業發展之展望。行政院農委會。取自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=10429 洪煥周（2019年12月19日）。英國新創SRC開發農產業即服務解決方案 導入機器人減輕農作負擔。DIGITIMES電子時報。取自：https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&id=0000574405_VN85524NLGM7EF6AXHYSC 程晏鈴（2018年5月23日）。90%農校生不從農？三方聯手要讓農校起死回生。天下雜誌。取自：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5090112 黃孝怡（2018）。策略性專利布局：從企業專利策略到專利布局。智慧財權月刊，236。 黃彥慈、楊雅婷、謝毅安、劉婕柔、劉育姍（2022）。臺灣農產業人力團政策研析。臺中區農產業改良場特刊，145，47–70。 楊智凱、楊舒涵、施瑩艷（2016年7月）。以智慧科技邁向臺灣農產業4.0時代。行政院農委會。取自：https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=%202505139 經濟部（2015）。美國專利須知。取自：file:///Users/yaohsinying/Desktop/%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E9%A0%88%E7%9F%A5.pdf 農傳媒（2018年4月18日）。《Young農通訊》調查：高職農校產學落差嚴重？如何解？。取自：https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/21081 劉育姍、楊雅婷（2020年7月16日）。全球迎戰農產業缺工！智慧農機、共享模式成主流。豐年雜誌。https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/41862 劉宥杉（2019年1月9日）。走在農產業智慧化的路上，美日先進國家之發展構想與期望達到之效益。行政院農產業委員會農產業試驗所。https://www.intelligentagri.com.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J142604730042131234&sid=0J177573429900195561 蔡清池、戴逢均（2019年8月8日） 。智慧農產業機器人的技術現況與展望。農產業科技資訊決策平台。取自：https://agritech-foresight.atri.org.tw/article/contents/1840 豐年社（2017年11月2日）。超過6成願務農，卻只有2成4畢業後願選擇農林漁牧業，高職農校生想什麼？農傳媒。取自：https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/18756 貳、英文 Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3-13. Abraham, B.-P., & Moitra, S.-D. (2001). Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 21(4), 245-252. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230. Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 811-829. Arditoa, L., D'Adda, D. & Petruzzellia, A.-M. (2018). Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 317-330. Ayaz, M., Ammad-Uddin, M., Sharif, Z., Mansour, A. & Aggoune, E.-H. M. (2019) Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based smart agriculture: Toward making the fields talk. IEEE Access, 7, 129551-129583. Bansler, J.P., & Havn, E. (2006).Sensemaking in technology-use mediation: adapting groupware technology in organizations. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15 (1), 55-91. Barcellini, F., Détienne, F. , & Burkhardt, J.-M. (2008). User and developer mediation in an open source software community: Boundary spanning through cross participation in online discussions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(7), 558-570. Barney, J., & Wright, P.-M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37, 31-46. Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2011). Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation. European Management Journal, 29(5), 362-367. Beugelsdijk, S., & Mudambi, R. (2013). MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 413-26. Birkinshaw, J., & Ambos, T.-C., & Bouquet, C.(2017). Boundary spanning activities of corporate HQ executives insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 422-454. Bonino, D., Ciaramella, A., & Corno, F. (2010). Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics. World Patent Information, 32(1), 30-38. Chuang, J.-H., Wang, J.-H., & Liou, Y.-C. (2020). Farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and adoption of smart agriculture technology in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19). Duan, K., Zhang, C., Li, J., Zhang, R., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Boundary-spanning search for knowledge, knowledge reconstruction and the sustainable innovation ability of agricultural enterprises: A Chinese perspective. Agriculture, 10(2), 39. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25 (3) , 233-242. Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195-218. Flor, M.-L., Cooper, S.-Y., & Oltra, M.-J. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36(2). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2021). Strategic Framework 2022-2031. Friha, O., Ferrag, M.-A., Shu, L., Maglaras, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Internet of things for the future of smart agriculture: A comprehensive survey of emerging technologies, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(4), 718-752. Goel, R.-K., Yadav, C.-S., Vishnoi, S., & Rastogi, R. (2021). Smart agriculture: Urgent need of the day in developing countries. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 30. Grant, R.-M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122. Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 395-414. Han, S., Datta, A., Joshi, K. D., & Chi, L. (2017). Innovation through boundary spanning: The role of IT in enabling knowledge flows across technological and geographical boundaries. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4). Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 511-515. Harvey, S., Peterson, R.-S., & Anand, N. (2014). The process of team boundary spanning in multi-organizational contexts. Small Group Research, 45, 506 - 538. Hatch, N.-W., & Dyer, J. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178. Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Moll, C.-B. (2021). Zooming into firms’ location, capabilities and innovation performance: Does agglomeration foster incremental or radical innovation?. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2). Hess, A., ＆ Rothaermel, F. T. (2011). When are assets complementary? star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 895-909. Hohberger, J. (2016). Does it pay to stand on the shoulders of giants? An analysis of the inventions of star inventors in the biotechnology sector. Research Policy, 45(3), 682-698. Imran, M.-A., Ali, A., Ashfaq, M., Hassan, S., Culas, R., & Ma, C. (2018). Impact of climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices on cotton production and livelihood of farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. Sustainability, 10(6). Katz, D., & Kahn, R.-L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York. Kim H.-U., & Bae T.-S. (2017). Preliminary study of deep learning-based precipitation prediction. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 35 (5), 423-429. Kristjanson, P., Reid, R.-S., Dickson, N., Clark, W.-C., Romney, D., Puskur, R., MacMillan, S., & Grace, D. (2009). Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13), 5047-5052. Lakhwani, K., Gianey, H., Agarwal, N., & Gupta, S. (2019). Development of IoT for smart agriculture a review. In: Rathore, V., Worring, M., Mishra, D., Joshi, A., Maheshwari, S. emerging trends in expert applications and security. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 841. Lanjouw, J. a& M. Schankerman. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129–151. Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335-363. Liu, K. (2014). Human capital, social collaboration, and patent renewal within U.S. pharmaceutical firms. Journal of Management, 40(2), 616-636. Liu,T., Mao, Y., & Xuan, T.(2017). The role of human capital: Evidence from patent generation. Cornell University. Maddikunta, P.-K. R., Hakak, S., Alazab, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Unmanned aerial vehicles in smart agriculture: Applications, requirements, and challenges. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(16), 17608-17619. Mekala, M.-S., & Viswanathan, P. (2017). A survey: smart agriculture IoT with cloud computing. 2017 International conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems, 1-7. Menon, C. (2009). Stars and comets: an exploration of the patent universe. Spatial Economics Research Centre Discussion Papers. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, U.K. Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4), 634-659. Mwongera, C., Shikuku, K.-M., Twyman, J., Läderach, P., Ampaire, E., Asten, P.-V., Twomlow, S., & Winowiecki, L.-A. (2017). Climate smart agriculture rapid appraisal (CSA-RA): A tool for prioritizing context-specific climate smart agriculture technologies, Agricultural Systems, 151, 192-203. Oettl, A. (2012). Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Science, 58(6), 1122–1140. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ratcheva, V. (2009). Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes: The case of multidisciplinary project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 206-215. Ratnaparkhi, S., Khan, S., Arya, C., Khapre, S., Singh, P., Diwakar, M., & Shankar, A. (2020). Smart agriculture sensors in IOT: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. Rehman, A., Saba, T., Kashif, M., Fati, S.-M., Bahaj, S.-A., & Chaudhry, H. (2022). A revisit of Internet of things technologies for monitoring and control strategies in smart agriculture. Agronomy, 12(1), 127. Reiche, B.-S. (2011). Knowledge transfer in multinationals: The role of inpatriates' boundary spanning. Human Resource Management, 50(3), 365-389. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306. Rothaermel, F.-T., & Hess, A.-M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18, 898-921. Sambamurthy, V., & Subramani, M. (2005). Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 1-7. Schmoch, U., H. Grupp, W., & Mannsbart, B. Schwitalla. (1988). Technikprognosen mit Patentindikatoren. Verlag TÜVRheinland, Köln. Shin, J., & Jalajas, D. (2010). Technological relatedness, boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 21(2), 87-96. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1996). Communication role that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, 277-301. Su, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Innovation of agricultural economic management in the process of constructing smart agriculture by big data. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 31, 100579. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450-463. Sutter, M., & Kochner, M.-G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics Scientometrics, 51, 405-414. Tao, W., Zhao, L., Wang, G., & Liang, R. (2021). Review of the internet of things communication technologies in smart agriculture and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 189. Termeer, C.-JAM, & Bruinsma, A. (2016). ICT-enabled boundary spanning arrangements in collaborative sustainability governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 91-98. The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017). The World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Tushman, M.-L. & Scanlan, T.-J. (2017). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2). UK IP Office (2014). The Internet of Things: A patent overview, UK Intellectual Property (IP) Office. van Zeebroeck, N. (2007). The puzzle of patent value indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 20. World Bank Group (2021) Climate-Smart Agriculture. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climate-smart-agriculture Yang, J., Sharma, A., & Kumar, R. (2021). IoT-based framework for smart agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 12(2). Zanella, A.-R., Silva, E., & Albini, L.-C. P. (2020). Security challenges to smart agriculture: Current state, key issues, and future directions, Array, 8. Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Armstrong, J. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), v-170. Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290-306. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87331 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 因應人口糧食需求及農產業勞動力問題，各國紛紛投入農產業科技創新技術的發展行列，然其所需技術內容，已超出傳統農產業的範疇。因此好奇新興的農產業科技創新技術其人才來源。本研究目的試圖回應：（一）2001年至2021年間，人才投入農產業科技創新技術領域的分布趨勢。（二）不同農產業科技創新技術領域，其跨界人才類型的績效差異。（三）探究非明星人才與明星人才合作對非明星人才的績效影響。本研究透過JPO機構的農產業科技創新技術檢索條件，於USPTO進行檢索，梳理出農產業科技創新技術領域專利共7900筆，農產業科技創新技術人才所屬專利16861筆。並依照人才過往的發明性質，劃分為六種類型：農技術應用人才、農技術創新人才、非農技術延伸應用人才、非農技術激發創新人才、A01新進者，與非A01新進者。進一步探討不同人才類型，在農產業科技創新領域的影響。根據研究結果，可知自2013年後，人才投入農產業科技創新技術領域分布，皆呈現正成長，以非農技術激發創新人才為主要的投入類型。此外，本研究發現當人才自身技術與農產業關聯性越弱，人才在農產業科技創新技術領域會有更佳的表現，以及當非明星人才與明星人才合作時，會提升非明星人才在領域的績效表現。建議未來的農產業科技創新技術發展，從與農產業差異較大的技術領域，尋找人才投入，或領域人才與明星人才合作，以擴大明星人才的影響效益，進而協助農產業科技創新技術發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Nations have incorporated innovative agri-technologies in response to population food demand and workforce issues in the agricultural industry. However, many advanced techniques have exceeded the scope of the traditional agricultural sector. So, where do the talents that support agri-tech's development come from? The current thesis aims to undercover (1) The distribution of talents in innovative agri-tech fields from 2001 to 2021 (2) The performance of various talent types in different agri-tech fields; (3) Whether non-star talents cooperating with star talents can improve non-star talent performance. We used JPO documents to define innovative agri-technologies and search for USPTO patent documents. 7,900 patents and 16,861 inventors from innovative agri-tech fields are sorted. Furthermore, the inventors can be divided into six types based on their past inventions: agri-application talents, agri-innovation talents, non-agricultural extended application talents, non-agricultural radical innovation talents, A01 new entrants, and non-A01 new entrants. We explored the impact of different talent types in seven innovative agri-tech fields. According to the results, since 2013, the distribution of talents has shown positive growth, with non-agricultural radical innovation talents as the primary input type. Furthermore, the talent performs better when the correlation between the talent's techniques and the agricultural industry is weaker. Besides, as non-star talents cooperate with star talents, their performances will be enhanced. As a result, those developing innovative agri-technologies should look for talents in industries other than agriculture, and non-star talents cooperating with star talents could expand the influence of star talents to benefit the development of innovative agri-technologies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T17:06:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T17:06:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目錄 iii
表目錄 iv 口試委員會審定書 v 誌謝 vi 中文摘要 vii 英文摘要 viii 第壹章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 一、農產業與科技產業結合應用的發展趨勢 1 二、我國農產業在人力資源的發展挑戰 3 三、人才流動在技術發展具關鍵作用 4 第二節 研究動機 6 第三節 研究目的 7 第四節 名詞定義 8 一、農產業科技創新技術概念 8 二、農產業科技創新技術領域專利檢索範圍界定 9 三、農產業科技創新技術人才類型 10 四、明星人才概念界定 11 第貳章 文獻探討 12 第一節 農產業科技創新技術領域 12 一、農產業科技創新技術的重要性 12 二、農產業科技創新技術的概念應用與實踐 14 第二節 科技發展下人才的跨界溝通 19 一、人才在空間位置的跨界溝通 19 二、人才在組織層級的跨界溝通 20 三、人才在領域間的跨界溝通 22 第三節 技術發展與專利文獻分析 24 一、專利文獻衡量技術創新 24 二、專利文獻探討人才的跨界溝通 26 三、專利文獻分析人才表現 27 第參章 研究方法 29 第一節 資料搜集 29 一、研究資料來源 29 二、研究樣本 30 第二節 專利計量 33 一、農產業科技創新技術人才類型 33 二、專利品質分數及人才品質分數計算 37 第三節 明星人才應用分析 39 第肆章 研究結果 41 第一節 人才投入農產業科技創新技術領域分布趨勢 41 一、農產業科技創新技術專利在領域分布概況 41 二、農產業科技創新技術人才於領域分布概況 44 三、農產業科技創新技術人才類型的分布概況 46 第二節 人才投入農產業科技創新技術領域表現 49 ㄧ、領域人才類型分布 49 二、領域人才類型績效 51 三、人才類型投入領域的績效綜整 58 第三節 明星人才在農產業科技創新技術領域之影響 59 一、明星人才在感測器領域 60 二、明星人才在自動裝置領域 61 三、明星人才在基因技術應用領域 62 第伍章 研究結論與建議 64 第一節 研究結論 64 第二節 研究建議 66 第三節 研究限制 68 參考文獻 69 壹、中文 69 貳、英文 71 附錄一：日本JPO農產業技術創新分類 78 附錄二：本研究與JPO報告農產業科技創新技術人才檢索條件對照 81 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 明星人才 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研發人才 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 跨界溝通 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農產業科技 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | agri-technologies | en |
| dc.subject | boundary spanning | en |
| dc.subject | star talents | en |
| dc.subject | R&D talents | en |
| dc.title | 農產業科技創新技術的研發人才類型與績效表現分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Analysis of R&D Talents’ Types and Performance in Innovative Agri-Technologies | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 薛招治;董蕙茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chao-Chih Hsueh;Huei-Ru Dong | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 跨界溝通,農產業科技,研發人才,明星人才, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | boundary spanning,agri-technologies,R&D talents,star talents, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 94 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300557 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。