請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87261
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪廣冀 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Kuang-Chi Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳怡君 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Chun Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:41:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-19 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 2014臺北雙年展——劇烈加速度,https://www.taipeibiennial.org/2014/tw/index.html。
2018臺北雙年展——後自然,https://www.taipeibiennial.org/2018/。 2020臺北雙年展——你我不住在同ㄧ星球上,https://www.taipeibiennial.org/2020?ddlLang=zh-tw。 臺北市立美術館 2015。2014臺北雙年展——劇烈加速度。臺北:臺北市立美術館。 臺北市立美術館 2019。2018臺北雙年展——後自然。臺北:臺北市立美術館。 臺北市立美術館 2021。2020臺北雙年展——你我不住在同ㄧ星球上。臺北:臺北市立美術館。 網路文章 吳樹安 2014。人類世與其不滿 2014年台北雙年展:劇烈加速度。 https://artemperor.tw/focus/604 (擷取日期:2023年1月10日) 溫佩珍 2018。2018年「島航計畫」塑膠微粒成果分析。https://www.kuroshio.org.tw/newsite/article02.php?info_id=517 (擷取日期:2022年12月20日) 李娉婷 2014。展示象龜惹爭議 北美館:早已改善。https://www.apatw.org/project-article/2641 (擷取日期:2023年1月10日) 蔡蘊明 2017。【1995諾貝爾化學獎】臭氧層—生物層的致命弱點。https://teaching.ch.ntu.edu.tw/nobel/?p=12 (擷取日期:2023年1月20日) 高森信男 2018。追尋另一種自然的可能及困境:評2018台北雙年展。https://artouch.com/art-views/art-exhibition/content-5625.html (擷取日期:2023年1月20日) 楊成瀚 2020。人類世在台發展的三個區段。https://artouch.com/art-views/content-28923.html (擷取日期:2023年1月15日) 楊成瀚 2020。生命威脅的解消與生命價值的尋覓:人類世時代的藝術與科學。https://www.digiarts.org.tw/DigiArts/DataBasePage/4_168251347276027/Chi (擷取日期:2023年1月15日) 張耀仁 2021。欠缺模式下的科普出版「傳奇」:析論1980年代台灣科普套書之傳播策略及其知識觀。新聞學研究,149: 155-196。DOI: 10.30386/MCR.202108.0018 藝術家網站 Artist Rachel Sussman’s website, http://www.rachelsussman.com . Artist Rachel Sussman’s another website, The Oldest Living Things in the World, http://oltw.blogspot.com Artist Femke Herregraven’s website, http://femkeherregraven.net . Artist CHANG Yung-Ta’s website, https://www.changyungta.com . Artist Nicholas Mangan’s website, https://www.nicholasmangan.com . Artist Marlie Mul’s website, http://marliemul.com . 影像 Moving Earths A Lecture Performance, https://media.medfarm.uu.se/play/video/9878 Nicholas Mangan - Termite Economies: Neural Nodes and Root Causes | Sutton Gallery, https://vimeo.com/418302253 . 外文文獻 Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (F. Bradley & T. J. Trenn, Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Bryant W. & Lewis C.S. (1995) The Re-vision of Planet Earth: Space Flight and Environmentalism in Postmodern America. American Studies, 36-2, 43-63. Elkins, J. (1995) Art History and Images That Are Not Art, The Art Bulletin, 77:4, 553-571, DOI: 10.1080/00043079.1995.10786656 Crutzen, P.J. & Stoermer, E.F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17. Crutzen, P. (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415, 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a Steffen, W.; Sanderson, A.; Tyson, P.D.; Jäger, J.; Matson, P.A.; Moore III, B.; Oldfield, F.; Richardson, K.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; Turner II, B.L.; Wasson, R.J. (2004). Global Change and the Earth System. A planet under Pressure. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Dolye, J. (2007) Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. Science as Culture 16, no.2:129-150. Law, J. (2009) Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Benschop, R. (2009) STS on Art and The Art of STS: An Introduction. Krisis, Issue 1. Lorimer, J. (2012) Aesthetics for post-human worlds: Difference, expertise and ethics. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2-3, 284-287. Ellis, E.C.; Kaplan, J.O.; Fuller, D.Q.; Vavrus, S.; Goldewijk, K.K.; Verburg, P.H. (2013). Used Planet: A Global History. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 7978–7985. Möllers, N. (2013) Cur(at)ing the Planet-How to Exhibit the Anthropocene and why. RCC Perspectives, No.3, Anthropocene: Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans, 57-66. Lekan, T. M. (2014) Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, vol.5, 171-201. Mirzoeff, N. (2014) Visualizing the Anthropocene. Public Culture. 26:2, doi: 10.1215/08992363-2392039 Skillington, T. (2015) Theorizing the Anthropocene, European Journal of Social Theory, 18-3, 229-235. Clark, T. (2015) Ecocriticism on the edge: The Anthropocene as a threshold concept. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Davis, H. & Turpin, E. (2015) Art & Death: Lives Between the Fifth Assessment & the Sixth Extinction. Art in the Anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press. Emmelhainz, I. (2015) Images Do Not Show: The Desire to See in the Anthropocene. Art in the Anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press. Streitmatter-Tran, R. & Le, V. (2015) The Cerumen Strata: From Figures to Configurations. Art in the Anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press. Carey, J. (2016). Core concept: Are we in the “Anthropocene”?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113: 3908-3909. Danielewitz, C. & Pedersen P.O. (2016) Documenting the Invisible. Ekfrase. Vol6. 10-20. Haraway, D.; Ishikawa, N.; Gilbert, S. F.; Olwig, K.; Tsing, A.; Bubandt, N. (2016) Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene, Ethnos, 81:3, 535-564, DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838 Svenning, J.-C.; Pedersen, P.B.M.; Donlan, C.J.; Ejrnæs, R.; Faurby, S.; Galetti, M.; Hansen, D.M.; Sandel, B.; Sandom, C.J.; Terborgh, J.W.; et al. (2016) Science for a Wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and Future Directions for Trophic Rewilding Research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 113, 898–906. Lorimer, J. (2017) The Anthropo-scene: Aguide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science, vol47-1, 117-142. Malhi, Y. (2017). The Concept of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42:1, 77-104. Last, A. (2017) We Are the World? Anthropocene Cultural Production between geopolitics and geopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society. 34:2-3, 147-168. Demos, T.J. (2017) Against the Anthropcoene. Visual Culture and Environment Today. Cambridge: MIT Press. Oppermann, S. (2018) The Scale of the Anthropocene. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, Special Issue: Scale, 51-3, 1-17. Davis, J.; Moulton, A. A.; Sant, L. V.; Williams, B. (2018) Anthropocene, Capitalocene,… Plantationocene?: A Manifesto for Ecological Justice in an Age of Global Crises. Geography Compass. 13:e12438. Ballard, S. & Linden, L. (2019) Spiral Jetty, geoaesthetics, and art: Writing the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review. Vol6, 1-2, 142-161. Farrier, D. (2019) Anthropocene Poetics: Deep Time, Sacrifice Zones, and Extinction. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. Luciano, E. (2019). The Anthropocene in its Early Scientific Phase (2000-2009): Objects and Objectives. Paper presented at 10th Biennial European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) Conference ‘Boundaries in/of Environmental History’At: Tallinn, Estonia. Chakrabarty, D. (2019) Museums Between Globalisation and the Anthropocene, Museum International, 71:1-2, 12-19, DOI: 10.1080/13500775.2019.1638022 Blok, A & Jensen, C.B. (2019) The Anthropocene event in social theory: On ways of problematizing nonhuman materiality differently. The Sociological Review, 67-7, 1195-1211. Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Opha Pauline Dube, et al.. (2020). The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, Nature, 1 (1), 54-63. Šikanja, S. (2020) A Vision of the Planet of the Earth in the Next 300 - 500 Years under Climate Change with Proposed Measures to Mitigate the Effects of Climate Change. Open Journal of Forestry, 10, 155-171. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2020.101011. Borgdorff, H. A., Peters, P., & Pinch, T. (2020). Dialogues between artistic research and science and technology studies: an introduction. In Dialogues between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429438875-1 Spiegel, S. J. (2020) Visual Storytelling and Socioenvironmental Change: Images, Photographic Encounters, and Knowledge Construction in Resource Frontiers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110:1, 120-144, DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1613953 Mathews, A. S. (2020) Anthropology and the Anthropocene: Criticism, Experiments, and Collaborations. The Annual Review of Anthropology. 49, 67-82. Page, J. (2020) Planetary art beyond the human: Rethinking agency in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review. Vol7-3, 273-294. Page, J. (2021) Decolonizing Science in Latin American Art. London: University College London. Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Ellis, E. C., Head, M. J., Vidas, D., Steffen, W., et al. (2021). The Anthropocene: Comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines. Earth's Future, 9, e2020EF001896. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001896 Perrin Selcer, (2021) Anthropocene, Encyclopedia of the History of Science, accessed 20 January 2023. https://doi.org/10.34758/zr3n-jj68. Isager, L., Vestergaard K., Theilade, I. (2021) A New Keyword in the Museum: Exhibiting the Anthropocene. Museum & Society, March 2021. 19(1) 88-107. Rogers, H.S., Halpern, M.K., Hannah, D., Ridder-Vignone, K. (2021) Routledge Handbook of Art, Science, and Technology Studies. Abingdon: Routledge Limited. Bu ̈scher, B. (2022) The nonhuman turn: Critical reflections on alienation, entanglement and nature under capitalism. Dialogues in Human Geography. 12:1, 54-73. Rogers, H. S. (2022) Art, Science, and The Politics of Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87261 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 人類世是熱門的關鍵字,未來幾年有望成為正式的地質學專有名詞。它是個定義不精確的詞彙,不只如此,它還是個非具象的概念,仰賴視覺的呈現。想要具體呈現人類世,多方行動者必須用視覺的表現手法,方能展開氣候變遷政治與地球系統科學的論述。乍看之下,當代藝術只是舉辦許多同名主題展覽,無意介入政治跟科學。然而,本研究指出,當代藝術造就的視覺驚奇,正是出於人類世的不可見特質。本研究以「當代藝術如何使人類世得以可見?」為核心發問,質疑科學主義造成的隱蔽效應以及科學把藝術視為傳播工具兩點,主張展開藝術與科學的對稱性思考,探討台北雙年展近年來三屆以人類世為主題的展覽。
本研究按展覽時序來安排章節,2014年「劇烈加速度」在當時搶先以人類世為題,可是它並不像環境議題的展覽,也較少受到討論,但值得注意的是,人類世反過來改變了關係藝術;2018年「後自然」,舉辦時正逢當代藝術的人類世熱潮,主張環境危機既是科學問題,也是文化問題,並且提倡藝術的介入;2020年「你我不在同一星球上」,乃是由法國知名學者Bruno Latour與策展人搭檔合作,儘管引起科學展非藝術展之爭議,但他其實藉著展覽表達質疑,即科學視覺技術限制了人類「看見」地球的途徑。 本研究的貢獻在於從人類世可見與不可見的雙重屬性重新思考當代藝術對科學文化的回響,複雜化藝術與科學的互動,揭露科學對視覺媒介的依賴,以及藝術其實並非不介入,反而是在重置該觀看經驗。另一貢獻則是指出當代藝術展覽的公共性應納入藝術與科技社會研究(ASTS),也應更加重視藝術對科學與政治關係的批評。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Anthropocene is an influential keyword. It is an unofficial geological term, also a non-figurative concept that relies on visual presentation. To present the Anthropocene concretely, multi-actors must use visual representations to discuss climate change politics and Earth system science. At first glance, contemporary art just holds many exhibitions with the same name and has no intention of getting involved in politics and science. However, this study points out that the visual wonder produced by contemporary art is precisely due to the invisible quality of the Anthropocene. This research focuses on "How can contemporary art make the Anthropocene visible?", questioning the concealment effect caused by scientism and science's view of art as a communication tool, advocating symmetrical thinking between art and science, and discussing the Taipei Biennale The exhibition has held three exhibitions with the theme of the Anthropocene in recent years.
This study arranges the chapters according to the chronological order of the exhibitions. In 2014, "Vigorous Acceleration" was the first to focus on the Anthropocene, but it was not like an exhibition on environmental issues, and it was less discussed. However, it is worth noting that the Anthropocene is the opposite. Changed the relational art; "Post-Nature" in 2018 was held at the time of the Anthropocene boom in contemporary art, advocating that the environmental crisis is not only a scientific issue, but also a cultural issue, and advocated the intervention of art; "You and I are not on the same planet" in 2020, is a cooperation between the well-known French scholar Bruno Latour and the curator partner. Although it caused controversy that the science exhibition is not an art exhibition, he expressed doubts through the exhibition that scientific visual technology limits the way humans "see" the earth. The contribution of this study lies in rethinking contemporary art’s response to scientific culture from the perspective of the visible and invisible dual attributes of the Anthropocene, complicating the interaction between art and science, exposing the dependence of science on visual media, and the fact that art is not non-intervention, but rather This viewing experience is being reset. Another contribution is to point out that the public nature of contemporary art exhibitions should be included in the study of art and technology society (ASTS), and more attention should be paid to art's criticism of the relationship between science and politics. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:41:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:41:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 iv Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 不可見的人類世 1 第二節 科學與藝術的交會:使人類世變得可見 2 第三節 對稱性思考:藝術對科學的揭露 18 第四節 研究方法 21 第五節 章節安排 24 第二章 「在人類、動物、植物與物之間」:人類世對關係藝術的影響 25 第一節 搶先策展人類世?普及跟探索未知的兩難 25 第二節 Bourriaud的反駁 28 第三節 注意原本不具存在感的物 31 第四節 當物超出控制 34 第三章 「重新思考自然」:藝術對當下所處世界的介入 38 第一節 既是科學問題,也是文化問題 38 第二節 展示「科學」 42 第三節 感知人類以外的時間 49 第四節 與非人打交道 54 第四章 把地球看成蓋婭 58 第一節 隱蔽的「我們只有一個地球」敘事 58 第二節 觀看「地球」? 62 第五章 結論 69 引用文獻 73 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 想像人類世:臺北雙年展中的科學及其再現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Envisaging the Anthropocene: The Use and the Representation of Science in the Taipei Biennial | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉巧楣;楊子樵 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chiao-mei LIU ;Zi-Qiao Yang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 人類世,科學想像,台北雙年展,當代藝術, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | the Anthropocene,Scientific Imagination,Taipei Biennale,Contemporary Art, | en |
dc.relation.page | 78 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300616 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-20 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 20.24 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。