Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87167Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王俊豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jiun-Hao Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張麗卿 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Ching Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:08:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-01-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中央畜產會（2016）。友善生產標章。取自https://www.naif.org.tw/main.aspx
中華民國乳業協會（1955）。中華民國乳業協會。取自https://www.dat.org.tw/ 台灣動物社會研究會（2022）。畜禽水產品動物福利標章。取自https://www.east.org.tw/sites/east/files/content/file/AWC/east_certified.pdf 全國法規資料庫（2013）。臺紐經濟合作協定ANZTEC液態乳配額量。取自法務部全國法規資料庫https://law.moj.gov.tw/ 行政院農委會（2022）。生乳產量表；進口乳量表；乳牛飼養資料表。取自行政院農委會農業統計資料庫https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/InquireAdvance.aspx 行政院農業委員會（2019）。動物福利白皮書。臺灣：陳吉仲。 吳宗憲（2014）。當政治遇上動物──多元政治意識形態下的動物保護觀點。應用倫理評論（56），頁23-43。 吳明哲、黃鈺嘉、張菊犁、李素珍、施意敏、王政騰、陳榮泰、丁進來、王忠恕（2009）。娟姍牛在台灣夏季的乳量與乳質表現。中國畜牧學會會誌。 吳明隆、涂金堂（2016）。SPSS與統計應用分析(二版十九刷).台北:五南。 李佳蓉（2019）。經濟動物福祉認知與支持之關係-以雞蛋和鮮奶為例。國立金門大學企業管理學系碩士班，金門縣。 李政忠（2003）。從抽樣與統計方法探討網路問卷調查的可行性:比較電話訪談與網路問卷樣本的實質差異性。廣播與電視（21），頁55-94。 李若威（2022）。走過三次乳業危機、2025年將再遭逢挑戰！臺灣乳業越挫越勇一甲子。食力foodNEXT，26。 李國華、陳志毅、張菊犁（2013）。DHI牛群生產年限風險因子之探討(SRPD)。載於陳志毅（主編） 周孟萱（2009）。消費者對雞蛋偏好與對動物福利願付價格之研究-聯合分析法之應用。 林書帆、林君翰、何嘉浩、康椒媛、邱柏綱、李朝全（2019）。圖解三大經濟動物友善飼養指南-飼養密度平衡,環境豐富化為重點。豐年雜誌，69（2），頁24-25。 林書帆、邱宜君、林慧貞（2019）。打通動物福利市場，消費者認知為火車頭－官方建立標示制度，優先提升辨識度。豐年雜誌，69（2），頁46-52。doi:10.6708/harvest.201902_69(2).0009 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論,技術與應用。：Shuangyeshulangyouxiangongsi。 陳裕哲（2016）。在「通權達變」與「一體適用」之間-我國經濟動物福利政策執行之研究。國立臺南大學行政管理學系碩士班，台南市。 陸昱宇（2021）。消費者對於動物福利雞蛋之購買行為分析。國立高雄科技大學運籌管理系，高雄市。 費昌勇（2002）。動物倫理與公共政策。臺灣商務印書館。 楊雋珩、田育志（2021）。讓臺灣酪農業站穩國際賽舞臺－打不了價格戰，就靠高品質、差異化突圍。豐年雜誌，71（10），頁18-25。doi:10.6708/harvest.202110_71(10).0005 臺灣動物社會研究會（2018）。友善雞蛋聯盟。取自https://www.east.org.tw/ 臺灣動物社會研究會（2021）。動物福利標章。取自https://www.east.org.tw/ 臺灣農業標準協會（2012）。友善畜產。取自http://www.tsas.tw/ 臺灣農業標準協會（2014）。人道監控。取自http://www.tsas.tw/ 羅璿（2022a）。【島國悲歌】台灣狹長地小、氣候高溫多濕！先天條件不利發展乳業。食力fooddNEXT，26。 羅璿（2022b）。【紐乳侵入】2025年紐西蘭進口液態乳全面零關稅！台灣牧場成長受限、價格戰迫在眉睫。食力fooddNEXT，26。 關懷生命協會（2020）。台灣動保青年論壇，2020動保政策分析及倡議策略營。 Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. Bmj, 314(7080), 572. Boogaard, B. K., Bock, B. B., Oosting, S. J., Wiskerke, J. S. C., & van der Zijpp, A. J. (2011). Social acceptance of dairy farming: The ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(3), 259–282. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. Busch, G., & Spiller, A. (2018). Consumer acceptance of livestock farming around the globe (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 1–3). Oxford University Press US. CIWF. (2018). CIWF. https://www.ciwf.org.uk DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Applied social research methods series. L, Brickman., & DJ Rog.(Eds), Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ellis, K. A., Billington, K., McNeil, B., & McKeegan, D. E. F. (2009a). Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare, 18(3), 267–282. European Commission. (2016). Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare. Brussels: EU publications. Farm Animal Welfare Council. (1979). FAWC. https://fawc.org/ Farm Animal Welfare Council. (1992). FAWC updates the five freedoms. Vet. Rec., 131, 357. Fraser, A. F., & Broom, D. M. (1997). Farm animal behaviour and welfare (Issue Ed. 3). CAB international. Gassler, B., Xiao, Q., Kühl, S., & Spiller, A. (2018). Keep on grazing: Factors driving the pasture-raised milk market in Germany. British Food Journal. Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management. Macmillan Coll Division. Getter, K. L., Behe, B. K., Conner, D. S., & Howard, P. H. (2014). Pasture-raised milk: the market for a differentiated product. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20(2), 146–161. Goldstein, J., & Martin, L. L. (2000). Legalization, trade liberalization, and domestic politics: a cautionary note. International Organization, 54(3), 603–632. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis macmillan. New York, 47, 82. Harison, R. (1964). Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. London: Vincent Stuart Publishers. Horowitz, A., C., & Bekoff, M.(2007). Naturalizing Anthropomorphism: Behavioral Prompts to Our Humanizing of Animals. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 20(1), 23–35. Hawkins, D. I., & Tull, D. S. (1993). Marketing research: Measurement & method. New York. Hewson, C. J. (2003). What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. The Canadian Veterinary Journal= La Revue Veterinaire Canadienne, 44(6), 496–499. James, M., & Krecek, R. C. (2000). Management of draught animals: a welfare and health perspective in South Africa. Kaumbutho PG, Pearson RA and Simalenga TE (Editors). Lord, F. M. (1968). Some test theory for tailored testing. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1968(2), i–62. Malhotra, N., Hall, J., Shaw, M., & Oppenheim, P. (2006). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Pearson Education Australia. María, G. A. (2006). Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livestock Science, 103(3), 250–256. McInerney, J. (2004). Animal welfare, economics and policy. Report on a Study Undertaken for the Farm & Animal Health Economics Division of Defra, 68. Napolitano, F., Braghieri, A., Piasentier, E., Favotto, S., Naspetti, S., & Zanoli, R. (2010). Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay. Food Quality and Preference, 21(2), 207–212. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, 97–146. Polsky, L., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2017). Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(11), 8645–8657. Rondoni, A., Asioli, D., & Millan, E. (2020). Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106, 391–401. Schröder, M. J. A., & McEachern, M. G. (2004). Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(2), 168–177. Singer, P. (1973). Animal liberation. In Animal rights (pp. 7–18). Springer. Stampa, E., Schipmann-Schwarze, C., & Hamm, U. (2020). Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 82, 103872. Tomasevic, I., Bahelka, I., Čítek, J., Čandek-Potokar, M., Djekić, I., Getya, A., Guerrero, L., Ivanova, S., Kušec, G., & Nakov, D. (2020). Attitudes and beliefs of eastern european consumers towards animal welfare. Animals, 10(7), 1220. Trent, N., Ormel, P., de Siles, J. L. G., Heinz, G., & James, M. (2003). The state of meat production in developing countries: 2002. Umberger, W. J., Boxall, P. C., & Lacy, R. C. (2009). Role of credence and health information in determining US consumers’ willingness‐to‐pay for grass‐finished beef. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53(4), 603–623. Universal Declaration on animal Welfare (2001). Universal Declaration on animal Welfare. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87167 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 動物福利在處理經濟動物的相關議題時，僅僅著重在動物的生活環境與飼養的身心狀態。然而，經濟動物的畜養，在產業內，需要留意成本與效益的比例，同時也需要應付自由貿易條約下，與國外畜養產業的競爭。臺灣處於亞熱帶，氣候長年濕熱，並不利於畜產業的發展，因此，要留意牛隻畜養的環境與健康，符合動物福利的規範，其成本必然上漲。然而，消費者在食安問題日益嚴重的狀況下，越發重視畜產品本身的安全與可靠程度，因為這與健康有關。連帶，也更加關注動物福利議題。本研究欲了解消費者對動物福利與標章的認知和態度，是否會影響到畜產品的消費行為。研究者以動物福利標章認證的鮮乳為研究範圍，於2022年7-8月在10個和動物福利相關的Facebook粉絲頁和社團發放線上問卷網址，有效回收問卷共310份，有效回收率為62%；接著，使用統計軟體SPSS與AMOS進行資料分析。
結果發現消費者的動物福利認知對於福利標章、態度及購買福利認證鮮乳有顯著影響；標章認知對於動物福利態度及購買福利認證鮮乳時也會有顯著影響；鮮乳的消費習慣及對於動物福利的態度都會影響認證鮮乳的購買意願。建議酪農業者與相關動物福利團體可以更強化於增加消費者對動物福利認證鮮乳的正向評價。農委會相關單位可以透過更多元的管道，傳達動物福利認證鮮乳對於環境的友善，對整體環境優化的影響與動福認證鮮乳和一般集約式餵養乳製品的優勢，增強消費者對動物福利認證鮮乳的正向評價，當整個市場上對於動福製品的接受度提高後，即有機會將提升國內的酪農產業與動物福利的發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | When dealing with issues related to economic animal welfare, people usually focus their living environment, physical and mental well-beings. In recent decades, the raising of economic animals needs not only to concern the cost-benefit ratio, but also to compete with foreign livestock industries under free trade agreements. Taiwan is located in the subtropical zone. The climate is hot and humid all the year round, and is not conducive to the development of the livestock industry. Therefore, it will increase the cost when it is necessary to monitor the raising environment and health of cattle, and to meet the animal welfare regulations. However, consumers pay more attention to the safety and reliability of animal products due to food safety problems and animal welfare issues. The purpose of this study is to understand whether consumers' cognition and attitude towards animal welfare and labels would affect the consuming behavior of livestock products. Using fresh milk certified by animal welfare labels as an example, an online questionnaire survey was conducted on 10 animal welfare related Facebook fan pages and communities in July and August 2022. As of September 3, 2022, a total of 342 questionnaires were collected, excluding 32 missing answers and incorrect answers, and 310 valid questionnaires were collected, with a valid collection rate of 62%.
A total of 310 valid questionnaires were assayed, and it was found that consumers’ animal welfare awareness had a significant impact on welfare labels, attitudes, and consumption of welfare-certified fresh milk. Also, label awareness had a significant impact on animal welfare attitudes and consumption of welfare-certified fresh milk. The consumption habits and the attitudes regarding animal welfare will affect the willingness to purchase certified fresh milk. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:08:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:08:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究流程 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 臺灣酪農業的發展歷史 7 第二節 貿易自由化對臺灣酪農業之衝擊 10 第三節 動物福利的理念與法規 12 第四節 乳牛之動物福利與驗證制度 15 第五節 消費者對動物福利的認知與態度 23 第六節 消費者對動物福利驗證產品的消費行為 25 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究架構 27 第二節 研究工具 29 第三節 資料收集與分析方法 33 第四章 資料分析結果 39 第一節 樣本與量表的描述統計 39 第二節 差異分析 46 第三節 結構方程模式 56 第五章 結論與建議 61 第一節 研究結論 61 第二節 研究建議 64 中文參考書目 67 外文參考書目 69 附錄一、問卷 73 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 動物福利驗證標章 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 動物福利 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 購買意願 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 酪農業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | fresh milk | en |
| dc.subject | animal welfare | en |
| dc.subject | animal welfare label | en |
| dc.subject | attitude | en |
| dc.subject | purchase intention | en |
| dc.title | 消費者對動物福利標章驗證制度之研究 -以酪農業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Consumers' Attitudes toward Animal Welfare Label Certification System: A Case Study of Dairy Farming | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃秋蓮;王思永 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chiou-Lian Huang;Sai-Yung Wang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 動物福利,動物福利驗證標章,態度,購買意願,酪農業, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | animal welfare,animal welfare label,attitude,purchase intention,fresh milk, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 77 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300024 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-01-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-01-01 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 2.56 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.