請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87099完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 柯冠州 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuan-Chou Ko | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂蕙安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Huei-An Lu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-05T17:30:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abt, C. C. (1970). Serious games. University press of America.
Allal-Chérif, O., & Bidan, M. (2017). Collaborative open training with serious games: Relations, culture, knowledge, innovation, and desire. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 31-38. Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 295-315. Barbara, J. (2017). Measuring User Experience in Multiplayer Board Games. Games and Culture, 12(7-8), 623-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015593419 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 Batson, C. D. (1987b). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). Elsevier. Batson, C. D. (1991b). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Psychology Press. Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press, USA. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Griffitt, C. A., Barrientos, S., Brandt, J. R., Sprengelmeyer, P., & Bayly, M. J. (1989). Negative-state relief and the empathy—altruism hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(6), 922. Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991a). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol, 61(3), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.413 Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of personality and social psychology, 40(2), 290. Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(1), 65. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987a). Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. J Pers, 55(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x Batson, C. D., Oquin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. M. (1983). Influence of Self-Reported Distress and Empathy on Egoistic Versus Altruistic Motivation to Help. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(3), 706-718. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1037//0022-3514.45.3.706 Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(1), 105. Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991c). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 87-98. BNPParibas. (2009, March 2nd.). BNP Paribas launches “Starbank” a game which allows employees to learn about banking activities. https://group.bnpparibas/en/press-release/bnp-paribas-launches-starbank-game-employees-learn-banking-activities Boltz, L. O., Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: Empathy through gaming-perspective taking in a complex world. TechTrends, 59(6), 3-8. Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003 Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance Buckley, K. E., & Anderson, C. A. (2012). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In Playing video games (pp. 427-446). Routledge. Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of consumer research, 27(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1086/314309 Castronova, E., & Knowles, I. (2015). Modding board games into serious games: The case of Climate Policy. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(3), 41-62. Clore, G. L., & Jeffery, K. M. (1972). Emotional role playing, attitude change, and attraction toward a disabled person. J Pers Soc Psychol, 23(1), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032867 Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: a two-stage model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36(7), 752. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 Corti, K. (2006). Games-based Learning; a serious business application. Informe de PixelLearning, 34(6), 1-20. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Davis, M. H. (1983a). Measuring Individual-Differences in Empathy - Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 Davis, M. H. (1983b). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of personality, 51(2), 167-184. Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996a). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: a merging of self and other. J Pers Soc Psychol, 70(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.713 Davis, M. H., & Empathy 2nd, A. (1996b). A social psychological approach. In: Westview Press Boulder. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 Donovan, L., & Lead, P. (2012). The use of serious games in the corporate sector. A State of the Art Report. Learnovate Centre (December 2012). Eisenack, K. (2013). A climate change board game for interdisciplinary communication and education. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2-3), 328-348. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychol Bull, 101(1), 91-119. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3562705 Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press. Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. M. V., Paiva, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Ferreira, A., & Santos, F. (2021). Exploring empathy in cyberbullying with serious games. Computers & Education, 166, 104155. Feshbach, N. D. (1975). Empathy in Children - Some Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 25-30. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1177/001100007500500207 Finlay, K. A., & Stephan, W. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1720-1737. Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological bulletin, 137(4), 517. Franklin, S., & Peat, M. (2005). Virtual versus real: an argument for maintaining diversity in the learning environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 15(1-2), 67-78. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2017). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. In Simulation in Aviation Training (pp. 475-501). Routledge. Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., Bushman, B. J., Rowell Huesmann, L., & Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 35(6), 752-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045 Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179-187. Greitemeyer, T., & Osswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol, 98(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016997 Grund, C. K., & Meier, M. C. (2016). Towards game-based management decision support: Using serious games to improve the decision process. Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), 155-166. Guillén-Nieto, V., & Aleson-Carbonell, M. (2012). Serious games and learning effectiveness: The case of It’sa Deal! Computers & Education, 58(1), 435-448. Hackler, D., & Saxton, G. D. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public administration review, 67(3), 474-487. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in human behavior, 54, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045 Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. Nebraska symposium on motivation, Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in science education, 40(5), 743-757. IBM. (2010, March 3th). IBM Unveils New 'Serious Game' To Tackle Urban Challenges https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ibm-unveils-new-serious-game-to-tackle-urban-challenges-92688214.html Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations. Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification cases in STEM education. In Gamification in Learning and Education (pp. 125-139). Springer. Kineo. (2014). A till-training game for McDonald's. https://kineo.com/case-studies/mcdonalds-till-training-game Krath, J., Schurmann, L., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning*. Computers in human behavior, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963 L'Oréal. (2010, March 31th). L'Oréal launches a revolutionary concept - Reveal by L'Oréal - First multi-vocation business game to unveil hidden talents https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/loreal-launches-a-revolutionary-concept---reveal-by-loreal---firstmulti-vocation-business-game-to-unveil-hidden-talents-539672661.html Larson, K. (2020). Serious games and gamification in the corporate training environment: A literature review. TechTrends, 64(2), 319-328. Lavender, T. J. (2008). Homeless: It’s no game-measuring the effectiveness of a persuasive videogame School of Interactive Arts & Technology-Simon Fraser University]. Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychol Med, 34(5), 911-919. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703001624 Liket, K. C., Rey-Garcia, M., & Maas, K. E. H. (2014). Why Aren't Evaluations Working and What to Do About It A Framework for Negotiating Meaningful Evaluation in Nonprofits. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013517736 Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625-648. Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of consumer research, 35(3), 543-557. Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. R. (2014). Lessons from Resource Dependence Theory for Contemporary Public and Nonprofit Management. Public administration review, 74(1), 14-+. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12181 Mayo, M. J. (2007). Games for science and engineering education. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 30-35. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1145/1272516.1272536 Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1 Middleton, J. A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach. Journal for research in mathematics education, 26(3), 254-279. Nieh, H. P., & Wu, W. C. (2018). Effects of a Collaborative Board Game on Bullying Intervention: A Group-Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sch Health, 88(10), 725-733. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12675 Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). When the black box springs open: practical work in schools and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 807-818. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2014). How much is it going to cost me? Bidirectional relations between adolescents' moral personality and prosocial behavior. Journal of adolescence, 37(7), 993-1001. Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1085-1100. https://doi.org/Doi 10.2307/3069390 Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter, C. (2010). The Effects of a Serious Game on Role-Taking and Willingness to Help. Journal of communication, 60(4), 723-U356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01511.x Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu Rev Psychol, 56, 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141 Phan, M. H., Keebler, J. R., & Chaparro, B. S. (2016). The Development and Validation of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS). Hum Factors, 58(8), 1217-1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816669646 Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.10.003 Ratan, R. A., & Ritterfeld, U. (2009). Classifying serious games. In Serious games (pp. 32-46). Routledge. Riedel, J. C., Feng, Y., Azadegan, A., Romero, M., Usart, M., & Baalsrud Hauge, J. (2014). Measuring the commercial outcomes of serious games in companies–a review. International conference on serious games development and applications, Rogerson, M. J., & Gibbs, M. (2018). Finding Time for Tabletop: Board Game Play and Parenting. Games and Culture, 13(3), 280-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016656324 Roussos, G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Playing below the poverty line: Investigating an online game as a way to reduce prejudice toward the poor. Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(2). https://doi.org/Artn 3 10.5817/Cp2016-2-3 Sabourin, J. L., & Lester, J. C. (2013). Affect and engagement in Game-BasedLearning environments. IEEE transactions on affective computing, 5(1), 45-56. Sagarin, B. J., Cialdini, R. B., Rice, W. E., & Serna, S. B. (2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: the motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol, 83(3), 526-541. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.526 Siemens. (2011). Siemens Launches Plantville — An Innovative Gaming Platform to Showcase Products and Solutions for Industry and Infrastructure. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/siemens-launches-plantville--an-innovative-gaming-platform-to-showcase-products-and-solutions-for-industry-and-infrastructure-118571809.html Skinner, B. F. (2019). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. BF Skinner Foundation. Sousa, M. (2020). Modern Serious Board Games: modding games to teach and train civil engineering students. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Sterkenburg, P. S., & Vacaru, V. S. (2018). The effectiveness of a serious game to enhance empathy for care workers for people with disabilities: A parallel randomized controlled trial. Disabil Health J, 11(4), 576-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.03.003 Susi, T. J., M.; Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games: An overview. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=-9909&pid=diva2%3A2416 Sze, J. A., Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion, 12(5), 1129-1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025011 Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(1), 56. Uskov, A., & Sekar, B. (2014). Serious games, gamification and game engines to support framework activities in engineering: Case studies, analysis, classifications and outcomes. IEEE international conference on electro/information technology, Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243. Watt, D. F. (2005). Social bonds and the nature of empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8-9), 185-209. Wei, M. L., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J. (2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1509/jppm.27.1.34 Whitton, N. (2012). The place of game‑based learning in an age of austerity. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(2), pp249‑256-pp249‑256. Xu, Y., Barba, E., Radu, I., Gandy, M., & MacIntyre, B. (2011). Chores Are Fun: Understanding Social Play in Board Games for Digital Tabletop Game Design. DiGRA Conference, Zagal, J. P., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24-40. Zahorik, J. A. (1996). Elementary and secondary teachers' reports of how they make learning interesting. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 551-564. Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat Neurosci, 15(5), 675-680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87099 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | none | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Serious games are designed for purposes beyond pure entertainment, increasingly applied to a broad spectrum of fields in recent years. Notably, much of the research has focused on the effectiveness of serious games in for-profit organizations to engage stakeholders for specific purposes; however, the effects of serious games in the nonprofit sector to engage supporters for prosocial purposes is understudied. Besides, only some studies have empirically tested the effects of serious games on prosocial behavior and attitude changes. Nevertheless, the results were inconsistent, and the knowledge of the underlying mechanism is scant. The present study aimed to understand serious games' effects on low-cost and high-cost prosocial intentions toward people with disabilities and the psychological process that mediates their relationship. Findings from a one-factor (serious board game vs. online text-reading) between-subjects experiment among 101 undergraduate participants revealed that game players expressed significantly greater low-cost prosocial intentions than text readers, and the effect was partially mediated by empathy. On the contrary, serious games had no effect on and even decreased high-cost prosocial intentions since the perceived costs of helping are relatively high, which directed people’s concern for others in need toward self-focused concern. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-05T17:30:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-05T17:30:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment……………………………………………………………………....…....i
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………..………....ii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………..……....iii List of Figures……………………………………………………………………...……….v List of Tables……………………………………………………………….….….…....…..vi Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………….…...1 1.1 Background and Motivation……………………………………...…….…………..1 1.2 Research Problem……………………………………………...……….…………..1 1.3 Research Objectives……………………………………………...……………..…..3 1.4 Structure of The Research………………………………………...……...……..…..3 Chapter 2: Literature Review…………………………………………...……..……...….4 2.1 Design of Serious Game……………………………………………………….....…4 2.2 Adoption of Serious Game………………………………………………...…..…....5 2.3 Serious Game and Learning………………………………………...………..……..7 2.4 The Different Learning Objectives Between For-Profit Organizations and NPOs….8 2.5 The Potential of The Game Environment…………………………………..……….9 Chapter 3: Hypotheses………..………………………………...…………………….…..12 3.1 Empathy and Prosocial Behavior………………..……………...……………..…..12 3.2 Serious Game and Prosocial Behavior………….……………………………..…..13 3.3 The Mediating Role of Empathy……………………………………...……..…….15 Chapter 4: Empirical Study………………………………………...……………..……...17 4.1 Participants……………………………………………...………………….…..…17 4.2 Board Game The Journey……………………………………………….…....……17 4.3 Procedure………………………………………………...……………….……….20 4.4 Measures……………………………………………………………….………….22 4.5 Analyses and Results…………………………………………………….………..25 4.6 Discussion……………………………...……………………………….………...31 Chapter 5: General Discussion………………………………………………….………..32 5.1 Summary of Findings…………………………………...………………….….…..32 5.2 Theoretical Contribution…………………………………………...……..…….…35 5.3 Implication for Practices……………………………………………...……..…….35 5.4 Limitations and Future Directions……………………………………….....…..…36 References………………………………………………...………………………....….…39 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………...52 Appendix 1: Text-Reading Material Appendix 2: Post-questionnaire of the Experimental Group Appendix 3: Post-questionnaire of the Control Group | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | none | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | reinforcement | en |
| dc.subject | serious games | en |
| dc.subject | empathy | en |
| dc.subject | prosocial intentions | en |
| dc.subject | cost of helping | en |
| dc.title | 桌遊作為嚴肅遊戲的媒介對助人意向的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Board Game as a Medium to Initiate a Serious Game Will Be Effective for Prosocial Intentions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林嘉薇;林日璇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chia-Wei Lin;Jih-Hsuan Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | none, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | serious games,empathy,prosocial intentions,cost of helping,reinforcement, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300170 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-13 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 7.12 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。