請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86722完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃芳玫(Fung-Mey Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Nan Zhu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 朱一南 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-20T00:13:31Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-10 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 于若蓉,羅淇 (2003),「補習與升學機率:臺灣的實證分析」,臺灣經濟學會研討會。 中央研究院 (2018),「臺灣青少年成長歷程研究」。取自人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。(https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/browsingbydatatype_result.php?category=surveymethodandtype=2andcsid=1) 行政院主計總處 (2016),工業及服務業普查-105年普查結果統計表。(https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/dgbas04/bc2/105census/X00/P2.pdf) 行政院主計總處(2021),行業統計分類。(https://mobile.stat.gov.tw/StandardIndustrialClassification.aspx) 李敦義 (2006),「補習有助於升學嗎?—分析補習、多元入學與教育取得間的關係」,《教育與心理研究》,29(3),489–516。 林大森 (2001),「家庭教育資源對教育分流、教育取得之影響」,《國立政治大學社會學報》,31,45-75。 林大森,陳憶芬 (2006),「台灣高中生參加補習之效益分析」,《教育研究集刊》,52(4),35–70。 孫清山,黃毅志 (1996),「補習教育、文化資本與教育取得」,《台灣社會學刊》,19, 95–139。 陳怡靖 (2001),「台灣地區高中/技職分流與教育機會不均等性之變遷」,《教育研究集刊》,47,253–282。 陳怡靖,鄭燿男 (2000),「台灣地區教育階層化之變遷—檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在台灣的適用性」,《國科會研究刊:人文及社會科學》,10(3),416–434。 銀慶貞,陶宏麟,洪嘉瑜 (2012),「補習對考大學真的有用嗎?」,《經濟論文叢刊》, 40(1),73–118。 黃健倫 (2008),「國中生補習的決定因素與補習對成績的影響」,碩士論文,台北: 國立台灣大學經濟學研究所。 黃毅志,陳俊瑋 (2008),「學科補習、 成績表現與升學結果—以學測成績與上公立大學為例」,《教育研究集刊》,54(1),117–149。 劉正 (2006),「補習在台灣的變遷、效能與階層化」,《教育研究集刊》,52(4),1–33。 關秉寅,李敦義 (2008),「補習數學有用嗎?一個 「反事實」 的分析」,《台灣社會學刊》,41,97–148。 Addi‐Raccah, Audrey (2019), “Private Tutoring in a High Socio‐economic Secondary School in Israel and Pupils’ Attitudes Towards School Learning: A Double‐edged Sword Phenomenon.” British Educational Research Journal, 45(5): 938-960. Alexander, Karl L., Doris R. Entwisle, and Linda Steffel Olson (2007), “Lasting Consequences of the Summer Learning Gap.” American Sociological Review, 72(2): 167-180. Banerjee, Abhijit, Esther Duflo, and Garima Sharma (2021), “Long-Term Effects of the Targeting the Ultra Poor Program.” American Economic Review, 3(4): 471-486 Buchmann, Claudia (2002), “Getting Ahead in Kenya: Social Capital, Shadow Education, and Achievement.” Schooling and Social Capital in Diverse Cultures. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Buchmann, Claudia, Dennis J. Condron, and Vincent J. Roscigno (2010), “Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment.” Social Forces, 89(2): 435-461. Baker, David P., Motoko Akiba, Gerald K. LeTendre, and Alexander W. Wiseman (2001), “Worldwide Shadow Education: Outside-school Learning, Institutional Quality of Schooling, and Cross-national Mathematics Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1): 1-17. Bray, Mark, and Percy Kwok (2003), “Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-economic Patterns in Hong Kong.” Economics of Education Review, 22(6): 611-620. Byun, Soo-yong (2014), “Shadow Education and Academic Success in Republic of Korea.” Korean Education in Changing Economic and Demographic Contexts, 23: 39-58. Byun, Soo-yong, and Hyunjoon Park (2012), “The Academic Success of East Asian American Youth: The Role of Shadow Education.” Sociology of Education, 85(1): 40-60. Cheo, Roland, and Euston Quah (2005), “Mothers, Maids and Tutors: An Empirical Evaluation of Their Effect on Children's Academic Grades in Singapore.” Education Economics, 13(3): 269-285. Choi, Yool, and Hyunjoon Park (2016), “Shadow Education and Educational Inequality in South Korea: Examining Effect Heterogeneity of Shadow Education on Middle School Seniors’ Achievement Test Scores.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44: 22-32. Dang, Hai-Anh (2007), “The Determinants and Impact of Private Tutoring Classes in Vietnam.” Economics of Education Review, 26(6): 683-698. Galindo-Rueda, Fernando and Anna Vignoles (2005), “The Declining Relative Importance of Ability in Predicting Educational Attainment.” The Journal of Human Resources, 40(2): 335-353. Ishida, Hiroshi, Seymour Spilerman, and Kuo-Hsien Su (1997), “Educational Credentials and Promotion Chances in Japanese and American Organizations.” American Sociological Review, 62: 866-882. Jarvis, Jonathan A., Amy R. Read, Mikaela J. Dufur, and Shana Pribesh (2022), “Impacts of Family Structure on Shadow Education and Educational Achievement Among South Korean Youth.” International Journal of Educational Development, 89: 102-159. Jung, Jin Hwa and Kyung Hee Lee (2010), “The Determinants of Private Tutoring Participation and Attendant Expenditures in Korea.” Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2): 159-168. Lin, Eric S. and Yu-Lung Lu (2010), “The Causal Effect of the Cram Schooling Timing Decision on Math Scores.” Economics Bulletin, 30(3): 2330-2345. Lee, Jong-Tae, Yang-Boon Kim, and Cho-Hee Yoon (2004), “The Effects of Pre-class Tutoring on Student Achievement: Challenges and Implications for Public Education in Korea.” KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 1(1): 25-42. Lee, Soojeong and Roger C. Shouse (2011), “The Impact of Prestige Orientation on Shadow Education in South Korea.” Sociology of Education, 84(3): 212-224. Matsuoka, Ryoji (2015), “School Socioeconomic Compositional Effect on Shadow Education Participation: Evidence from Japan.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2): 270-290. Matsuoka, Ryoji (2018), “Inequality in Shadow Education Participation in an Egalitarian Compulsory Education System.” Comparative Education Review, 62(4): 565-586. Sakamoto, Arthur and Daniel A. Powers (1995), “Education and the Dual Labor Market for Japanese Men.” American Sociological Review, 60(2): 222-246. Stevenson, David Lee and David P. Baker (1992), “Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan.” American Journal of Sociology, 97(6): 1639-1657. Steiger, Douglas and James H. Stock (1997), “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica, 65(3): 557-586. Stock, James H. and Francesco Trebbi (2003), “Retrospectives: Who Invented Instrumental Variable Regression?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3): 177-194. Stock, James H. and Motohiro Yogo (2002), “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” Tsai, Chin-Chung and Pi-Chu Kuo (2008), “Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan.” International Journal of Science Education, 30(3): 353-375. Ünal, Hasan, E. Mehmet Özkan, Sande Milton, Kacey Price, and Fely Curva (2010), “The Effect of Private Tutoring on Performance in Mathematics in Turkey: A Comparison Across Occupational Types.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2): 5512-5517. Zhang, Yu (2013), “Does Private Tutoring Improve Students’ National College Entrance Exam Performance?—A Case Study from Jinan, China.” Economics of Education Review, 32: 1-28. Zhang, Yue-Yun and Yu Xie (2016), “Family Background, Private Tutoring, and Children’s Educational Performance in Contemporary China.” Chinese Sociological Review, 48(1): 64-82. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86722 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 補習是存在於正規教育體系之外的一種特殊教育活動。在過往對補習活動的實證研究中,主要圍繞補習在世界及各區域的普遍性、影響參與補習的因素和補習的效能三個方面進行討論。大部分的文獻呈現出補習的短期效能,也有文獻呈現了一定的長期效能。然而,尤其是在研究臺灣的文獻中,對於補習長期效能之討論甚為缺乏;且在現有之討論長期效能的文獻中,其「長期」的時間跨度並未很大。為探究更長時間跨度下的補習效能,本研究採用中央研究院社會所主導的「臺灣青少年成長歷程研究」之問卷內容作為數據資料,以2000年時臺北市、臺北縣和宜蘭縣市三個地區的國中生為研究樣本,並使用加入工具變數的兩階段最小平方法為模型來探討國中時期補習對學生未來的教育成就之影響為何。從實證結果可以得出,國中補習對學生未來教育成就確實存在長期效益。除了補習的直接效果,學生的家庭收入會透過補習活動對其教育成就產生間接效益。同時,進入一般高中 (相較技職高中)、自己對自己的教育期望越高、家長對自己的教育期望越高、國小的成績越好、國三的成績越好、母親的教育程度越高以及父母的婚姻狀況越穩定的臺灣國中生,其擁有更高的未來教育成就。其中,家長對自己的教育期望、國三成績是除補習變數外對教育成就增益效果最強的變數。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The cram school, or shadow education, includes a group of special education activities rendered outside the formal education system of a society. In the past literature, there are three main topics: how popular is the cram school/shadow education in this world, or a specific region? What are the considerations or determinants of attending the cram school/shadow education? Are cram school/shadow education activities really effective or beneficial? Most of the past literature has presented the short-term effect; some present the relative long-term effect. However, researches on the long-term effect are actually not in high quantity, especially for those studying Taiwan. Furthermore, the result will be much more solid if the study timeline length of current papers can be extended. In order to study the effectiveness of cram school in a longer timeline, this research use the questionnaire data of “Taiwan Youth Project” established by the Sociology Department, Academia Sinica, which encompasses junior high school student samples from Taipei City, New Taipei City and Yilan County in 2000. With the utilization of instrumental variable and two-stage least square regression model, this research aims at studying how the junior high cram school attendance will affect students’ education attainment in the future. By this research, the attendance of junior high cram school activities have significant positive long-term effects on student’s education attainment. Furthermore, family income improves student’s education attainment indirectly by supporting the attendance of junior high cram school activities. As for other factors, students who own general senior high school appearance (compared to vocational senior high school), higher self-expectation of education, higher parents-expectation of education, higher elementary school scores, higher senior high school scores (in the third year), higher mother-education attainment and more stable family, tend to have higher education attainment. Among those factors, the parents-expectation of education and senior high school scores (in the third year) are the most effective factors on education attainment, in addition to the cram school factors. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-20T00:13:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2607202218292800.pdf: 3664705 bytes, checksum: 9e04d573c6b62a22bd0a7e516e696993 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 11 第三節 研究流程 11 第二章 文獻回顧 13 第一節 補習文化的普遍性 13 一、在世界的普遍性 13 二、在區域的普遍性 14 第二節 影響參與補習的因素 17 一、國家因素 17 二、社會、家庭和個人因素 19 第三節 補習的效能 23 第三章 資料介紹 28 第一節 資料來源 28 第二節 變數定義與資料處理 30 一、教育成就變數 31 二、補習變數 33 三、控制變數 35 第三節 變數敘述統計 39 一、教育成就變數 39 二、補習變數 41 三、控制變數 44 第四章 實證模型與研究方法 47 第一節 工具變數 47 第二節 線性工具變數模型 49 第三節 二元工具變數模型 50 第五章 實證結果 52 一、自變數-補習 52 二、自變數-家庭收入 60 三、自變數-其他 61 第六章 結論與討論 64 第一節 結論 64 第二節 未來研究方向 66 參考文獻 67 附錄 71 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 教育成就 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 補習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 長期效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兩階段最小平方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 補習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 教育成就 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 長期效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兩階段最小平方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Long-Term Effects | en |
| dc.subject | Cram School/Shadow Education | en |
| dc.subject | Cram School/Shadow Education | en |
| dc.subject | Education Attainment | en |
| dc.subject | Long-Term Effects | en |
| dc.subject | Two-Stage Least Square | en |
| dc.subject | Education Attainment | en |
| dc.subject | Two-Stage Least Square | en |
| dc.title | 國中時期補習對教育成就之長期影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Long-Term Effects of Junior High Cram School Activities on Education Attainment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉家樺(Chia-Hua Liu),黃麗璇(Li-Hsuan Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 補習,教育成就,長期效能,兩階段最小平方法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cram School/Shadow Education,Education Attainment,Long-Term Effects,Two-Stage Least Square, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201747 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-10 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2607202218292800.pdf | 3.58 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
