請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8670完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張文亮 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tah-Ken Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃大肯 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T19:59:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-19 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T19:59:33Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.呂秀惠，2001。「頭前溪流域植生覆蓋變遷之研究」。碩士論文，交通大學土木工程研究所。
2.台北縣政府環境保護局，2005，『台北縣淡水河系主要支流排水水質淨化計畫-新海橋自然淨化系統工程建置計畫（第二期）及新海橋人工溼地取水擴增計畫』。台北：台北縣政府環保局 3.李琇玉，2006。「分層隨機抽樣下母體平均數推論之研究」。博士論文， 交通大學經營管理研究所。 4.姚銘輝、H陳守泓H、H陳述H。「台灣水稻田溫室氣體排放之估算研究」，『H臺灣農業研究H』。H55卷，6期H，280 -293。 5.陳江河，2010。「臺北縣現地處理水質淨化系統經營管理與功能效益分析計畫後續擴充」。台北縣政府環保局補助研究計畫。瑞昶科技股份有限公司。 6.張文亮，2007。「建立河川水質淨化工法指導原則暨評鑑計畫」。行政院環保署補助研究計畫。EPA-96-U1GI-0II-101。臺灣大學生態工程研究中心。 7.Brix, H.,B. K. Sorrell, B. Lorenzen.2001,“Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases?,” Aquatic Botany. 69, 313-324. 8.Bano, N., M. A. Moran, R.E. Hodson. 1997, “Bacterial utilization of dissolved humic substances from a freshwater swamp,’’Aquatic Microbial Ecology 12 : 233-238 9.Cochran, W. G., 1977 Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 10.Fagbenro, J. A. and B.Oyeleye,1999.“Relationships between four methods of organic carbon determination in leaves of nitrogen-fixing trees and lignite-based organic fertilizers,” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 30(17) : 2345-2362 11.Gholz, H. L.,1982, “Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest,” Ecology. 63(2) : 469-481. 12.Richards, J. A. and X. Jia, 2006. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 13.Rothman, E. and V. Bouchard, “Regulation of carbon processes by macrophyte species in a Great Lakes coastal wetland,” Wetlands. 27(4) 1134-1143 14.Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., and Hedmark, A., 2010“Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review,’’ Wetlands. 30:11I-124. 15.Kadlec R.H., and R. L. Knight,1996. Treatment wetlands. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. 16.Machate T, H. Noll, H.Behrens and A. Kettrup,1997. “Degradation of phenanthrene and hydraulic characteristics in a constructed wetland,” Water Research. 31:554–560. 17.Lillesand T. M. and Kiefer R. W.2000, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 4rd eddition, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000 18.Mander, U, K. Lohmus, S. Teiter, T. Mauring, K.Nurk and J. Augustin, 2008. “Gaseous fluxes in the nitrogen and carbon budgets of subsurface flow constructed wetlands,” Science of the Total Environment 404:343-353. 19.Miller. R. L. and R. Fujii, 2010. “ Plant community, primary productivity, and environmental conditions following wetland re-establishment in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California,” Wetlands Ecology and Management, 18:1–16. 20.Whalen S.C. 2005. “ Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands and the atmosphere,” Environmental Engineering Science, 22:73-94. 21.Zweifel, U. L. 1999. “Factors controlling accumulation of labile dissolved organic carbon in the Gulf of Riga. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 48:357–370 1.行政院主計處，2010。『綠色國民所得帳編製報告』。台北：行政院主計處。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs7/greengnp/4-II-5.pdf 2.林英傑，2002。「關渡自然公園水稻田生態經營之環境與教育經濟效益分析」。碩士論文，臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所。 3.林俊成、陳麗琴、薛怡珍、王培蓉，2008。「遊客對福山植物園解說需求與解說效果之研究」。『臺灣林業科學』，23卷，S37-S50。 4.林國詮、董世良、唐盛林、陳昭明，2001。「福山植物園解說效果之評估」。『中華林學季刊』，34卷，3期，323-330。 5.徐崇堯，2008。「博物館遊憩效益與遊客評價之研究-以國立自然科學博物館為例」。碩士論文，中興大學應用經濟學系研究所。 6.陳江河，2010。「臺北縣現地處理水質淨化系統經營管理與功能效益分析計畫後續擴充」。台北縣政府環保局補助研究計畫。瑞昶科技股份有限公司。 7.張文亮，2007。「建立河川水質淨化工法指導原則暨評鑑計畫」。行政院環保署補助研究計畫。EPA-96-U1GI-0II-101。臺灣大學生態工程研究中心。 8.吳珮瑛、曾筱芬、傅祖壇，2009。「心臟血管疾病門診醫療需求及其預 防效益之評估—納入異質性病患與就醫相關時間成本」，『應用經濟論叢』， 85 期，155-193。 9.吳珮瑛、蘇明達，2003。「生物多樣性資源價值之哲學觀與總價值內涵－抽象的規範或行動的基石」，『經社法治論叢』，31期，209-242 10.鄭蕙燕、張偉祐、林政德，2000。「四草野生動物保護區之遊憩效益與時間成本：截斷式波爾生模型之應用」。『農業經濟半年刊』。67期，16I-179。 11.簡婉莉，2007。「解說人員特性差異對解說服務與解說效益影響之研究」。碩士論文，銘傳大學觀光研究所。 12.蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪，2002。『環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用』，台北：俊傑書局。 13.Arrow, K. J. and A. C. Fisher, 1974. “Environmental preservation,uncertainty, and irreversibility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 88 : 31II-319 14.Cesario F. J., 1976 .“Value of time in recreation benefit studies,” Land Economics, 52(1) : 3II-41. 15.Creel, M. D. and J. B. Loomis, 1990. “Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 : 434-441. 16.Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer, 1980. Economics and Consumer Behavior Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press. 17.Engilin J. and J.S. Shonkwiler, 1995. “Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics.77(1) : 104-112. 18.Englin, J. and T. A. Cameron, 1996. “Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 7 : 133-147. 19.Freeman, A. M., 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Value: Theory and Methods. Second Edition. Washington, D. C. : Resources for the Future. 20.Grogger, J. T. and R. T. Carson,1991. “Models for truncated counts,” Journal Of Applied Econometrics, 6 : 225-238. 21.Haab, T. C. and K.E. McConnell, 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources : the econometrics of non-market valuation. Cheltenham, U. K.; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar. 22.Hellerstein, D. M. , 1991. “Using count data models in travel cost analysis with aggregate data.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(3) : 860-866 23.Machate, T., H. Noll, H. Behrens and A. Kettrup,1997. “Degradation of phenanthrene and hydraulic characteristics in a constructed wetland,” Water Research. 31:554–560. 24.McConell, K. E., 1975. “Some problems in estimating the demand for outdoor recreation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2) : 330-334 25.Smith, V. K., W. H. Desvousges, M. P. McGivney, 1983.“The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models,” Land Economics, 59(3) : 259-278. 26.Shaw, D. , 1988. “On-site samples' regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification,’’ Journal of Econometrics, 37:21I-223 27.Shrestha, R. K.,A.F. Seidl, Andrew S. Moraes.2002, “Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models,” Ecological Economics. 42 : 289-299. 28.Trice, A.H. and S. E. Wood, 1958. “Measurement of recreation benefits” Land Economics, 34 : 195-207 29.Tubb, K. N.,2003, “An evaluation of the effectiveness of interpretation within Dartmoor national park in reaching the goals of sustainable tourism development,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 11(6) : 476-498 30.Ward, F. A. and D. Beal, 2000. Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models : a Manual. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, 31.Yang W., J. Chang , B. Xu, C. Peng, and Y. Ge, 2008.“Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands:A case study in Hangzhou, China ,”Eclogical Economics. 68 : 116-125 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8670 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以新海二期人工溼地為實驗場址，透過現地分層隨機抽樣與植生影像辨識估算水生植物分布面積與單位面積生長數量，並以高溫灰化法求得植生中有機質含量，並估算水生植物碳吸存量。
研究結果發現，新海二期溼地五種優勢水生植物碳儲存量為：蘆葦(Phragmites australis) 501.7 gC m-2 yr-1、長苞香蒲(Typha angustata) 135.6 gC m-2 yr-1、蕹菜(Ipomoea aquatica ) 82.3 gC m-2 yr-1、巴拉草(Brachiaria mutica) 26.8 gC m-2 yr-1、臺灣水龍(Ludwigia x taiwanensis Peng) 17.5 gC m-2 yr-1，水生植物碳吸存量與植生葉面積指數、植生葉片面積成正相關。新海二期溼地優勢水生植物碳吸存量為211.0 gC m-2 yr-1。透過植生影像辨識求得新海二期人工溼地植生面積為35,652 gC m-2 yr-1，推估新海二期溼地水生植物碳儲存量為7.5 ton yr-1。 本研究以新海二期人工溼地為研究場址，探討人工溼地的生態效益。本研究透過市價法與旅行成本法評估人工溼地碳吸存效益、遊憩效益與環境解說效益，並探討環境解說對於遊憩需求的影響。 研究結果發現，人工溼地水生植物碳吸存效益為8,929元/年。對現地參訪遊客進行問卷調查，在假設時間成本為工資率的1/5~1/2下，新海二期人工溼地的遊憩效益為每位遊客741.9元/兩年∼687.0元/兩年。而在經過環境解說後，以旅行成本法評估新海二期人工溼地遊憩效益為每位遊客1890.3元/年∼2471.8元/年。人工溼地環境解說可增加遊客的重遊意願。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this research is to estimate carbon fixation of five dominate aquatic plants in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland in New Taipei City.Concering the analysis method, we used image based event identification and on site stratified random sampling to calculate area and density of aquatic plants in artificial wetland, and used high temperature combustion method to estimate organic matter content in aquatic plants.
The results showed that carbon fixation of five dominate aquatic plants in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland is : Phragmites communis 501.7 gC m-2 yr-1 , Typha angustata 135.6 gC m-2 yr-1 , Ipomoea reptans 82.3 gC m-2 yr-1, Brachiaria mutica 26.8 gC m-2 yr-1, Colocasia esculenta 22.2 gC m-2 yr-1 , Ludwigia x taiwanensis Peng 17.5 gC m-2 yr-1. Also, we found that aquatic plants carbon fixation are positive relative with leaf area index(LAI) and leaf area.Totally, carbon fixation of five dominate aquatic plants in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland is 211.0 gC m-2 yr-1. By means of image based event identification,We obtained the area of aquatic plants in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland is 35,652 m2, and that we can estimate the carbon fixation of aquatic plants in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland is 7.5 ton yr-1. The objective of this research is to estimate ecological benefit in Sinhai second phase artificial wetland in New Taipei City. We use substitute market method to estimate benefit of aquatic plant carbon fixation. We also use travel cost method to estimate recreation economic value. Also, We analyze the influence of environment interpretation to recreation demand. We found that the benefit of aquatic plant carbon fixation is 8,928 NTD/ yr. According to results of questionnaire survey, we found that environmental interpretation can increase the visitor’s revisit intention. There fore, by using wage rate 1/2 – 1/5 to estimate time cost, we can obtained the recreation benefit is per visitor 687.0 - 741.9 NTD/2 yr before environmental interpretation, and per visitor 1890.3 – 2471.8 NTD/yr after environmental interpretation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T19:59:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98622039-1.pdf: 1269019 bytes, checksum: c7be3f4957df8d2d96a85841784add88 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄I
圖目錄IV 表目錄V 第一章 新海人工溼地水生植物碳吸存量之評估 ESTIMATION OF CARBON FIXATION OF AQUATIC PLANTS IN SHINHAI ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS 摘要1 ABSTRCT1 ㄧ、緒論3 1.1 前言3 1.2 文獻回顧4 1.2.1 人工溼地碳循環4 1.2.2 水生植物與碳吸存5 1.3 研究目的6 二、理論分析7 2.1 研究架構7 2.2 分層隨機抽樣法8 2.3 植生影像辨識10 2.3.1 監督式分類11 2.3.2 貝氏分類法11 2.3.3 最大相似法決策原則11 2.3.4 多維常態分布模型12 2.3.5 誤差矩陣13 三、材料與方法15 3.1 新海二期溼地簡介15 3.2 調查植生選擇16 3.3 植體碳吸存量分析16 3.4 溼地單位面積植生數量調查17 3.5 植株葉面積指數調查19 3.6 植生影像辨識19 四、結果與討論23 4.1 人工溼地單位面積植物生長數量23 4.2 溼地植生碳吸存量24 4.3 植株葉面積與碳吸存量26 4.4 各區植生碳吸存量估計27 4.5 植生影像辨識31 4.5.1 植生影像辨識31 4.5.2植生影像辨識正確率評估32 4.6新海二期人工溼地碳吸存量之估算33 五、結論與建議34 5.1 結論 34 5.2 建議 35 六、參考文獻36 符號說明39 第二章 新海人工溼地水生植物碳吸存效益與環境解說效益之評估 BENEFIT EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND AQUATIC PLANTS CARBON IN SHINHAI ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS 摘要41 ABSTRCT41 一、緒論43 1.1前言 43 1.2文獻回顧 43 1.2.1 人工溼地生態系統服務經濟價值44 1.2.2 旅行成本法44 1.2.3 環境解說45 1.3研究目的 45 二、理論分析46 2.1 碳吸存效益46 2.2 旅行成本 46 2.3 旅行需求函數 47 2.4 旅行需求曲線計量模型 48 2.5 遊憩效益評估指標 49 三、研究場址與調查方法52 3.1新海二期人工溼地簡介 52 3.2 問卷資料蒐集 52 3.3環境解說滿意度評估53 四、結果與討論54 4.1碳吸存效益54 4.2遊憩效益評估55 五、結論與建議62 5.1結論62 5.2建議63 六、參考文獻64 符號說明67 附錄A.植生碳吸存量實驗數據69 附錄B.植生葉面積測量實驗數據72 附錄C. 溼地碳儲存量計算說明77 附錄D.本研究使用之問卷79 附錄E.遊客資料敘述統計表82 附錄F.遊客拜訪次數與交通成本關係圖83 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 新海人工溼地水生植物碳吸存量及效益與環境解說效益之評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Benefit Evaluation of Environmental Interpretation and Aquatic Plants Carbon Fixation in Sinhai Artificial Wetlands | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張尊國,吳珮瑛,游進裕,謝正義 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 碳吸存量,人工溼地,水生植物,植生影像辨釋,分層隨機抽樣法,生態效益,遊憩效益,環境解說,旅行成本法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | carbon fixation,artificial wetland,aquatic plants,image based event identification,stratified random sampling,ecological benefit,recreation benefit,environment interpretation,travel cost method, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 83 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.24 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。