請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86468完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許正熙(Cheng-Shi Shiu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mi-Chi Hsiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭米棋 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:57:35Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分 王文志、張自強、文榮光（2005）。〈精神科病患於日間病房之預後分析〉。《臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌》，(1)，36-43。 中華民國社會工作師公會全國聯合會（2019）。〈社會工作師倫理守則〉，取自：https://nusw.org.tw/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E5%80%AB%E7%90%86/。 李政賢（譯）（2016）。《社會工作研究方法》（原作者：Rubin & Babbie）。台北：五南。 何偉聖（2014）。《嚴重慢性精神障礙者其手足照顧經驗之探究》，中山醫學大學醫學社會暨社會工作學系碩士班學位論文。 余漢儀（2001）。〈精障病友家屬團體與專業之權力互動—兼論社工之介入策略〉。《臺大社會工作學刊》，5，1-51。 周月清、張恒豪（2017）。〈新制身心障礙鑑定與需求評估（ICF）執行之探討：身心障礙服務使用者觀點〉，《東吳社會工作學報》，第32期，1-34。 周月清、陳伯偉、張家寧（2019）。〈「個人助理是居服的補充包」？地方政府執行身心障礙者自立生活支持／個助服務的迷思與困境〉，《臺灣社會福利學刊》，15(2)，1-56。 周宇翔、李淑貞、謝東儒、陳政智、張聿淳（2015）。〈從服務使用者觀點探討身心障礙者鑑定與需求評估制度流程之研究〉，《身心障礙研究季刊，13(2)，86-106。 林昭吟（2008）。〈身心障礙者老化現象之概念探討與初探性實證研究〉，《東吳社會工作學報》，第19期，37-80。 沈詩涵、林萬億（2012）。〈精神障礙者在就業服務中的復原與復健〉，《東吳社會工作學報》，第24期，79-115。 胡海國（2003）。《台灣精神障礙者照護發展研討會彙編》。台北：財團法人國家衛生研究院。 梁美榮、姚奮志（2019）。〈身心障礙法定需求評估與個案管理服務整合之研究〉。《台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊》，9(2)，113-160。 郭惠雯（2013）。《精神分裂症病人出院後一年內再住院及其影響因子之研究》。國立臺北護理健康大學健康事業管理系碩士論文。 游淑真（2019）。《台灣都會地區精神障礙者健康服務的使用型態與影響因素》。東海大學社會工作學系博士論文。 張恒豪、顏詩耕（2011）。〈從慈善邁向權利：臺灣身心障礙福利的發展與挑戰〉，《社區發展季刊》第133期，402-416。 曹寶玉、余漢儀（2015）。〈重返社區之路：會所模式中的過渡性就業〉，《臺灣社會工作學刊》，第15期，1-50。 莊麗玉、黃美智（2014）。〈為何回家是條漫漫長路？談思覺失調症病人出院的自主權〉，《護理雜誌》，61(5)，85-90。 勞動力發展署（2015）。《協助精障者參加職業訓練作業手冊（完整版）》，取自https://vrrc.heart.net.tw/redirect_download.php?dod_no=1435033346&file_num=1&action=view_file 童伊廸（2013）。〈誰的正義？從精神障礙者案主自決省思專業價值的實踐〉，《台灣醫學人文學刊》，14(1&2)，65-83。 湯茹雲（2018）。《充權團體工作應用於精神科日間病房之成效評估》。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 監察院（2020）。《監察院糾正案文》，取自https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=134&s=6957 衛生福利部（2017）。〈身心障礙者權利公約法規概要〉，取自https://crpd.sfaa.gov.tw/BulletinCtrl?func=getBulletin&p=b_2&c=F&bulletinId=121 衛生福利部（2018）。《身心障礙者生活狀況及需求調查報告》。台北：衛生福利部。 衛生福利部（2020a）。〈社會福利統計—身心障礙者福利〉，取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2976-113.html 衛生福利部（2021）。〈全民健康保險重大傷病各疾病別有效領證統計表〉，取自https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=D529CAC4D8F8E77B&topn=23C660CAACAA159D 衛生福利部（2022a）。〈精神復健機構資源〉，取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/domhaoh/cp-402-61862-107.html 衛生福利部（2022b）。〈精神醫療機構資源〉，取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/domhaoh/cp-401-61846-107.html 劉素芬（2011）。〈社會功能與社區慢性精神病人復元之相關性研究－以社區復健中心與康復之家為例〉，《台大社會工作學刊》，23，137-180。 潘佩君、嚴嘉楓（2011）。〈老年身心障礙者的福利資源配置及服務輸送：以台灣與英國為例〉。《身心障礙研究季刊》，9（2），111-122。 潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北：心理。 潘盈儒（2019）。〈成年心智障礙者社區居住與生活服務方案服務輸送之檢視〉，《社區發展季刊》，168期，130-139。 謝佳蓉、蕭淑貞（2006）。〈台灣社區精神復健機構的服務現況與展望〉，《精神衛生護理雜誌》，1(2)，41-50。 蔡依潔（2019）。《社區復健中心學員用藥經驗與支持決定之探討》。暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系學位論文。 鍾沛妏（2020）。《成為照顧者：慢性精神病患之手足照顧者的決定與因應》。政治大學社會工作研究所學位論文。 二、西文部分 Adams, J. R., Drake, R. E., & Wolford, G. L. (2007). Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58(9), 1219-1221. Anderson, R. (2007). Thematic content analysis (TCA). Descriptive presentation of qualitative data, 1-4. Anderson, K. K., Fuhrer, R., Wynant, W., Abrahamowicz, M., Buckeridge, D. L., & Malla, A. (2013). Patterns of health services use prior to a first diagnosis of psychosis: the importance of primary care. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 48(9), 1389-1398. Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial rehabilitation journal, 16(4), 11. Anthony, W. A., Cohen, M. R., Farkas, M. D., & Gagne, C. (2002). Psychiatric rehabilitation. 2nd. Boston, MA: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Sargent College of Allied Health Professions. Bellack, A. S. (2006). Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(3), 432–442. Bijl, R. V., & Ravelli, A. (2000). Psychiatric morbidity, service use, and need for care in the general population: results of The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study. American journal of public health, 90(4), 602. Birchwood, M., & Macmillan, F. (1993). Early intervention in schizophrenia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 27(3), 374-378. Birchwood, M., Todd, P., & Jackson, C. (1998). Early intervention in psychosis. The British journal of psychiatry, 172(S33), 53-59. Carr, V. J., Johnston, P. J., Lewin, T. J., Rajkumar, S., Carter, G. L., & Issakidis, C. (2003). Patterns of service use among persons with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Psychiatric Services, 54(2), 226-235. Chadwick, A., Street, C., McAndrew, S., & Deacon, M. (2012). Minding our own bodies: Reviewing the literature regarding the perceptions of service users diagnosed with serious mental illness on barriers to accessing physical health care. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(3), 211-219. Cardol, M., Jong, B. D., & Ward, C. D. (2002). On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disability and rehabilitation, 24(18), 970-974. Chang, G., Weiss, A. P., Orav, E. J., & Rauch, S. L. (2014). Predictors of frequent emergency department use among patients with psychiatric illness. General hospital psychiatry, 36(6), 716-720. Chang, C. K., Hayes, R. D., Perera, G., Broadbent, M. T., Fernandes, A. C., Lee, W. E., … & Stewart, R. (2011). Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PloS one, 6(5), e19590. Chen, F. P., & Greenberg, J. S. (2004). A positive aspect of caregiving: The influence of social support on caregiving gains for family members of relatives with schizophrenia. Community mental health journal, 40(5), 423-435. Corsentino, E. A., Molinari, V., Gum, A. M., Roscoe, L. A., & Mills, W. L. (2008). Family caregivers' future planning for younger and older adults with serious mental illness (SMI). Journal of applied Gerontology, 27(4), 466-485. Coverdale, J. H., Bayer, T. L., McCullough, L. B., & Chervenak, F. A. (1993). Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Psychiatric Services, 44(7), 671-674. Coverdale, J. H., McCullough, L. B., & Chervenak, F. A. (2004). Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin, 30(3), 659-664. Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial rehabilitation journal, 11(4), 11. Delman, J., Clark, J. A., Eisen, S. V., & Parker, V. A. (2015). Facilitators and barriers to the active participation of clients with serious mental illnesses in medication decision making: The perceptions of young adult clients. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 42(2), 238-253. Eisikovits, Z., & Koren, C. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1642-1655. Fan, R. (1997). Self‐determination vs. family‐determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy. Bioethics, 11(3‐4), 309-322. George, L. K. (2007). Life course perspectives on social factors and mental illness. In Mental health, social mirror (pp. 191-218). Springer, Boston, MA. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. Guess, D., Benson, H. A., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10(2), 79-86. Gupta, S., Isherwood, G., Jones, K., & Van Impe, K. (2015). Assessing health status in informal schizophrenia caregivers compared with health status in non-caregivers and caregivers of other conditions. Bmc Psychiatry, 15(1), 1-11. Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading ethnographic research. London: Longman. Hatfield, A. B., & Lefley, H. P. (2005). Future involvement of siblings in the lives of persons with mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 41(3), 327-338. Hayes, L., Hawthorne, G., Farhall, J., O’Hanlon, B., & Harvey, C. (2015). Quality of life and social isolation among caregivers of adults with schizophrenia: Policy and outcomes. Community mental health journal, 51(5), 591-597. Holroyd, J. (2012). Clarifying capacity: value and reasons. In Radoilska, L. (Ed.), Autonomy and mental disorder. (pp. 145-169). Oxford University Press. Huxley, P., & Thornicroft, G. (2003). Social inclusion, social quality and mental illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(4), 289-290. Kate, N., Grover, S., Kulhara, P., & Nehra, R. (2013). Relationship of caregiver burden with coping strategies, social support, psychological morbidity, and quality of life in the caregivers of schizophrenia. Asian journal of psychiatry, 6(5), 380-388. King, G., Cathers, T., Brown, E., Specht, J. A., Willoughby, C., Polgar, J. M., … & Havens, L. (2003). Turning points and protective processes in the lives of people with chronic disabilities. Qualitative health research, 13(2), 184-206. King, R., Waghorn, G., Lloyd, C., McLeod, P., McMah, T., & Leong, C. (2006). Enhancing employment services for people with severe mental illness: the challenge of the Australian service environment. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(5), 471-477. Kohn, M. L., & Clausen, J. A. (1955). Social isolation and schizophrenia. American Sociological Review, 20(3), 265-273. Lakeman, R. (2010). Mental health recovery competencies for mental health workers: A Delphi study. Journal of Mental Health, 19(1), 62-74. Lêng, C. H., Chou, M. H., Lin, S. H., Yang, Y. K., & Wang, J. D. (2016). Estimation of life expectancy, loss-of-life expectancy, and lifetime healthcare expenditures for schizophrenia in Taiwan. Schizophrenia research, 171(1-3), 97-102. Lillehammer, H. (2012). Autonomy, value and the first person. In Radoilska, L. (Ed.), Autonomy and mental disorder. (pp. 145-169). Oxford University Press. Lowton, K. (2018). He said, she said, we said: ethical issues in conducting dyadic interviews. In Iphofen, R., & Tolich, M., Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics, 133-147.SAGE. Magliano, L., Fiorillo, A., De Rosa, C., Maj, M., & National Mental Health Project Working Group. (2006). Family burden and social network in schizophrenia vs. physical diseases: preliminary results from an Italian national study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113, 60-63. Marrone, J., & Golowka, E. (1999). If work makes people with mental illness sick, what do unemployment, poverty, and social isolation cause?. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23(2), 187. McCullough, L. B., Coverdale, J. H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2002). Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 187(3), 696-702. McDermott, F. E. (1975). Self-Determination in Social Work, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Mitsonis, C., Voussoura, E., Dimopoulos, N., Psarra, V., Kararizou, E., Latzouraki, E., … & Katsanou, M. N. (2012). Factors associated with caregiver psychological distress in chronic schizophrenia. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 47(2), 331-337. Morgan, D. L. (2016). Essentials of dyadic interviewing (Vol. 13). Routledge. Morgan, D. L., Ataie, J., Carder, P., & Hoffman, K. (2013). Introducing dyadic interviews as a method for collecting qualitative data. Qualitative health research, 23(9), 1276-1284. Munson, M. R., Jaccard, J., Smalling, S. E., Kim, H., Werner, J. J., & Scott Jr, L. D. (2012). Static, dynamic, integrated, and contextualized: A framework for understanding mental health service utilization among young adults. Social Science & Medicine, 75(8), 1441-1449. Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Appelbaum, P. S., & Jeste, D. V. (2004). Correlates of treatment-related decision-making capacity among middle-agedand older patients with schizophrenia. Archives of general psychiatry, 61(3), 230-236. Pathare, S., & Shields, L. S. (2012). Supported decision-making for persons with mental illness: A review. Public Health Reviews, 34(2), 15. Patja, K., Iivanainen, M., Vesala, H., Oksanen, H., & Ruoppila, I. (2000). Life expectancy of people with intellectual disability: a 35‐year follow‐up study. Journal of intellectual disability research, 44(5), 591-599. Perese, E. F. (2007). Stigma, poverty, and victimization: Roadblocks to recovery for individuals with severe mental illness. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13(5), 285-295. Pescosolido, B. A., Gardner, C. B., & Lubell, K. M. (1998). How people get into mental health services: Stories of choice, coercion and “muddling through” from “first-timers”. Social science & medicine, 46(2), 275-286. Pescosolido, B. A., & Boyer, C. A. (1999). How do people come to use mental health services? Current knowledge and changing perspectives. In Horwitz, A. V., & Scheid, T. L. (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. (pp. 392-411). Cambridge University Press. PRA. About PRA. Retrieved from https://www.psychrehabassociation.org/about/who-we-are/about-pra Qualls, S. H. (1997). Transitions in autonomy: The essential caregiving challenge an essay for practitioners. Family Relations, 46(1), 41-45. Radoilska, L. (2012) Introduction: personal autonomy, decisional capacity, and mental disorder. In Radoilska, L. (Ed.), Autonomy and mental disorder. (pp. ix-xli). Oxford University Press. Roick, C., Heider, D., Kilian, R., Matschinger, H., Toumi, M., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2004). Factors contributing to frequent use of psychiatric inpatient services by schizophrenia patients. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(9), 744-751. SAMHSA (2022). Recovery and Recovery Support. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help/recovery Saraceno, B., & Barbui, C. (1997). Poverty and mental illness. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(3), 285-290. Smith, G. C. (2003). Patterns and predictors of service use and unmet needs among aging families of adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 54(6), 871-877. Stroup, S., Appelbaum, P., Swartz, M., Patel, M., Davis, S., Jeste, D., ... & Lieberman, J. (2005). Decision-making capacity for research participation among individuals in the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophrenia research, 80(1), 1-8. Tkachuk, M., Russell-Mayhew, S., Kassan, A., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2019). Adapting descriptive psychological phenomenology to include dyadic interviews: Practical considerations for data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 24(2), 352-370. Wakabayashi, C., & Donato, K. M. (2006). Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(3), 258-274. Wasserman, J. A., & Navin, M. C. (2018). Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision‐Making. Hastings Center Report, 48(3), 31-39. Widdershoven, G. A., & Abma, T. A. (2012). Autonomy, dialogue, and practical rationality. Autonomy and mental disorder, 217-232. Wilkniss, S., & Zipple, A. (2009). Evidence-based practices and recovery at thresholds: Transformation of a community psychiatric rehabilitation center. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 12(2), 161-171. Woltmann, E. M., & Whitley, R. (2010). Shared decision making in public mental health care: Perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 34(1), 29. Woodrow, A., Sparks, S., Bobrovskaia, V., Paterson, C., Murphy, P., & Hutton, P. (2019). Decision-making ability in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the magnitude, specificity and correlates of impaired performance on the Iowa and Cambridge Gambling Tasks. Psychological medicine, 49(1), 32-48. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86468 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 精神疾病患者照顧是近年來受到社會福利界注意的服務議題之一，「老人照顧精神障礙老人」之壓力與風險更是受到社政單位重視。本研究以思覺失調症病人及其家屬陪伴者為訪談對象，了解雙方在最近一次的服務選擇經驗中，其復健目標、雙方對此次服務決策的看法，及思覺失調症病人自主決定的看法，進行訪談。此研究希望能啟發福利服務輸送或政策制定者，注重思覺失調症病人的意見和自主決定的觀點。 本研究以質性研究之對偶訪談法為資料蒐集方法，訪談6位35至45歲思覺失調症病人及4位家屬陪伴者（4對成對，共計10位受訪者），了解雙方在最近一次的服務決定經驗及各自的看法。研究者針對思覺失調症病人及其家屬雙方個別聯合進行1~2次訪談，訪談經研究對象同意後錄音、撰打逐字稿，及確保資料保密，並遵守我國社會工作研究倫理守則等相關倫理規範。研究分析以復元成果、自我期待和他人期待之落差、自主性為分析主題，兼討論其他影響決策之因素。研究結果發現思覺失調症病人個人的復元成果，的確影響個人行使其自主決定。研究分析結果也看見思覺失調症病人和其家屬陪伴者對可自主決定範圍的差異，也在服務決定上有不同的看法。 本研究建議如下：1. 無論是精神醫療專業人員、社區復健服務、個案管理服務，甚至非正式支持系統，對於思覺失調症病人的服務，長期陪伴與支持仍是較好的策略，較能看見其復元成果。2. 個人達到的復元成果有助於思覺失調症病人社群的自我充權，而自控感、獨立自主、自主／自助進而助人等價值便是復元成果呈現的面向之一。3. 旁人應該給思覺失調症病人在生活中多做決策的機會。專業人員在復健計畫或治療計畫的協商上，應保持一定的開放性與緊密溝通，以兼顧思覺失調症病人自主性和其健康福祉。4. 政策制定上應以精神疾病去污名為目標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Social and rehabilitation services for patients with mental illness has gained increasing attentions in social work literature over the past decade, with “aging of family caregivers and patients with mental illness” emerging as one of the pressing topics that concern both social work practitioners and policy makers alike. This study aims to investigate the perspectives about the decision-making on service use between mid-aged individuals with schizophrenia (MIS) and their aging family caregivers. More specifically, this study addresses the decision-making on the most recent service use, their rehabilitation goals, and MIS’s involvement in decision-making in the relational context with their aging family caregivers. This research hopes to provide additional information to service providers or policy makers, so that they can better appreciate the voices of MIS and their autonomy in making decisions. This study adopted a qualitative research approach, and conducted semi-structured, dyadic interviews with 6 MIS and 4 family caregivers (including 4 MIS-family caregiver dyads), using snowball sampling methods. The 6 participating MIS, aged between 35-45 years old, and 4 main family caregivers who were all 60 year-old and above, shared their latest experiences of service use/transitions and their opinions. The researcher first conducted joint dyadic interviews with MIS and their family caregivers, and then conducted 1-2 additional interviews separately with MIS and family caregivers. The researcher fully complied with the social work research ethics: the researcher obtained full informed consents before conducting interviews and recording during interviews, and ensured confidentiality of the interviews and participants. The researcher then applied thematic analysis on the transcriptions of the interviews. The analysis yielded several themes, including recovery outcomes, the differences in recovery expectations between MIS and their family caregivers, autonomy, and factors that influenced decision-making on services use. This study found that recovery outcomes can impact MIS on exercising their autonomy in making decisions. Additionally, differences between MIS and their family caregivers in the degrees of self-determination MIS can enjoy lead to different opinions over decision-making on services use. The implications of this study include: First, for medical professionals, rehabilitation workers, mental health case managers, and informal supporters, provide longer support to MIS may result in better recovery outcomes. Second, MIS’s recovery outcomes can in turn help MIS further achieve self-empowerment, and value their self-control, autonomy, self-help, and mutual help, which are also integral components of recovery outcomes. Third, MIS should receive more opportunities to make decisions autonomically. Open and efficient communications are good strategies to ensure autonomy and wellness among MIS. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:57:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1608202220394500.pdf: 1888186 bytes, checksum: d040d450347c73727a2fab41e268df1f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究問題 3 第四節 研究目的與貢獻 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 思覺失調症家庭現況與需求 6 第二節 精神病人復健與照顧服務介紹 9 第三節 思覺失調症病人復元成果之衡量 13 第四節 思覺失調症病人的自主性與決策能力 15 第五節 思覺失調症家庭與健康服務體系的互動 17 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究方法說明 22 第二節 研究對象及選樣方法 23 第三節 資料蒐集方法 25 第四節 資料分析方法 26 第五節 資料蒐集與分析之品質 27 第四章 研究倫理 29 第一節 研究倫理基本準則 29 第二節 研究倫理實踐準則 29 第三節 研究者文化能力 31 第五章 分析與發現 32 第一節 復元成果 33 第二節 自我期待與旁人期待 38 第三節 自主性 45 第四節 病人和家屬陪伴者的其他考量因素 54 第六章 研究討論與結論 59 第一節 研究結果總結 59 第二節 研究討論 60 第三節 研究建議與限制 62 第四節 研究者反身性 63 參考文獻 65 附錄一 訪談大綱 76 附錄二 研究參與者知情同意書 78 表目錄 表1 台灣思覺失調症病人可用之社區復健或支持服務 9 表2 受訪者列表與基本資料 23 表3 分析結果摘要 32 圖目錄 圖1 文獻概念關係圖 21 圖2 研究分析圖 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 服務選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 思覺失調症 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 服務選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙老家庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 思覺失調症 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對偶訪談 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對偶訪談 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙老家庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | schizophrenia | en |
| dc.subject | service use | en |
| dc.subject | decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | aging caregivers of adult with schizophrenia | en |
| dc.subject | dyadic interviewing | en |
| dc.subject | schizophrenia | en |
| dc.subject | autonomy | en |
| dc.subject | service use | en |
| dc.subject | decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | aging caregivers of adult with schizophrenia | en |
| dc.subject | dyadic interviewing | en |
| dc.title | 思覺失調症患者的復健服務決策：患者與家屬陪伴者的觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Decision-making of service use among individuals with schizophrenia and their family members. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳芳珮(Fang-Pei Chen),熊秉荃(Ping-Chuan Hsiung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 思覺失調症,自主,服務選擇,決策,雙老家庭,對偶訪談, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | schizophrenia,autonomy,service use,decision-making,aging caregivers of adult with schizophrenia,dyadic interviewing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202471 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1608202220394500.pdf | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。