請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86431
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 袁孝維(Hsiao-Wei Yuan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yun-Xuan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林昀萱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:55:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王力平。(2003)。金門島栗喉蜂虎(Meropsphilipennus)營巢地選擇與繁殖生物學研究。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 王元均。(2006)。金門島栗喉蜂虎單獨與集體營巢之生殖策略分析。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 王怡平。(2005)。金門栗喉蜂虎營巢棲地復育效應與棲地選擇模式。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 交通部中央氣象局觀測資料查詢網站。https://e-service.cwb.gov.tw/HistoryDataQuery/ 李豪。(2009)。群集大小對棕沙燕繁殖之影響。(碩士)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。 金門縣港務處網站。https://harbor.kinmen.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=3123F82CF85F354C 徐爾烈,吳尹文,楊鈞任,王敦濤與方尚仁。(2002)。金門及馬祖地區鼠形動物之種類,分佈及密度調查。植物保護學會會刊,44(2),67-74。 袁孝維。(2002)。栗喉蜂虎營巢地環境因子研究報告。內政部營建署金門國家公園管理處委託研究報告。 袁孝維,王力平,& 丁宗蘇。(2003)。金門島栗喉蜂虎 (Merops philipennus) 繁殖生物學研究。國家公園學報,13(2),71-84。 袁孝維。(2015)。金門栗喉蜂虎遷徙生態調查(1/2)。內政部營建署金門國家公園管理處委託研究報告。 袁孝維。(2016)。金門栗喉蜂虎遷徙生態調查(2/2)。內政部營建署金門國家公園管理處委託研究報告。 張瀚柏。(2020)。金門栗喉蜂虎種內托卵寄生與棄蛋行為。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市. 陳映嵐。(2010)。舊巢洞使用與否對栗喉蜂虎繁殖成功的影響。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 陳鋒蔚。(2010)。栗喉蜂虎幫手對親鳥在餵食幼鳥時期之影響。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 劉奇璋。(2020)。建立棄蛋孵化之栗喉蜂虎族群及探討域內營巢坡面整理面積之影響與保育教育推廣。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 劉奇璋。(2021)。建立棄蛋孵化之栗喉蜂虎族群及測試人工巢箱使用成效。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 蔡佩妤。(2007)。金門島栗喉蜂虎生殖經驗對於繁殖棲地忠實性之影響。(碩士)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。 蕭木吉、李政霖。(2015)。台灣野鳥手繪圖鑑(二版)。台灣:行政院農業委員會林務局、社團法人台北市野鳥學會。 Alerstam, T. (2003). Bird migration speed. In Avian migration (pp. 253-267): Springer. Arroyo, B., Mougeot, F., & Bretagnolle, V. (2001). Colonial breeding and nest defence in Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(2), 109-115. Barbosa, A., Moreno, J., Potti, J., & Merino, S. (1997). Breeding group size, nest position and breeding success in the chinstrap penguin. Polar Biology, 18(6), 410-414. Beehler, B. M., & Foster, M. S. (1988). Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. The American Naturalist, 131(2), 203-219. Beletsky, L. D., & Orians, G. H. (1987). Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20(1), 21-34. Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (1996). Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior: University of Chicago Press. Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (2001). Avian coloniality. In Current ornithology (pp. 1-82): Springer. Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (2004). Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival probability in a colonial bird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56(5), 498-511. Brown, C. R., Stutchbury, B. J., & Walsh, P. D. (1990). Choice of colony size in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 5(12), 398-403. Brunton, D. (1999). “Optimal” colony size for Least Terns: An inter-colony study of opposing selective pressures by predators. The Condor, 101(3), 607-615. Brunton, D. H. (1997). Impacts of predators: center nests are less successful than edge nests in a large nesting colony of Least Terns. The Condor, 99(2), 372-380. Burt, D. B. (2002). Social and breeding biology of bee-eaters in Thailand. The Wilson Bulletin, 114(2), 275-279. Chan, K. M., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological economics, 74, 8-18. Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, S. M. Billerman, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. (2021). The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2021. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ Costa, J. S., Rocha, A. D., Correia, R. A., & Alves, J. A. (2020). Developing and validating a nestling photographic aging guide for cavity-nesting birds: an example with the European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster). Avian Research, 11(1), 1-8. Coulson, J. (1968). Differences in the quality of birds nesting in the centre and on the edges of a colony. Nature, 217(5127), 478-479. Coulson, J. (2002). Colonial breeding in seabirds. Biology of marine birds, 87-113. Danchin, E., Boulinier, T., & Massot, M. (1998). Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology, 79(7), 2415-2428. Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J., & Wagner, R. H. (2004). Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science, 305(5683), 487-491. Danchin, E., & Wagner, R. H. (1997). The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12(9), 342-347. Draulans, D. (1988). The importance of heronries for mate attraction. Ardea, 76(187), e192. Emslie, S. D., Karnovsky, N., & Trivelpiece, W. (1995). Avian predation at penguin colonies on King George Island, Antarctica. The Wilson Bulletin, 317-327. Götmark, F., & Andersson, M. (1984). Colonial breeding reduces nest predation in the Common Gull (Larus canus). Animal Behaviour, 32(2), 485-492. Hoi, H., Darolova, A., König, C., & Kristofík, J. (1998). The relation between colony size, breeding density and ectoparasite loads of adult European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). Écoscience, 5(2), 156-163. Hoi, H., & Hoi-Leitner, M. (1997). An alternative route to coloniality in the bearded tit: females pursue extra-pair fertilizations. Behavioral Ecology, 8(2), 113-119. Hoi, H., Krištofík, J., Darolová, A., & Hoi, C. (2010). Are parasite intensity and related costs of the milichiid fly Carnus hemapterus related to host sociality? Journal of Ornithology, 151(4), 907-913. Hoi, H., Krištofík, J., Darolová, A., & Hoi, C. (2012). Experimental evidence for costs due to chewing lice in the European bee-eater (Merops apiaster). Parasitology, 139(1), 53-59. Johnson, M. D. (2007). Measuring habitat quality: a review. The Condor, 109(3), 489-504. Lack, D. L. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 963-974. Legge, S. (2000). Helper contributions in the cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburra: feeding young is no laughing matter. Animal Behaviour, 59(5), 1009-1018. Lewis, S., Sherratt, T., Hamer, K., & Wanless, S. (2001). Evidence of intra-specific competition for food in a pelagic seabird. Nature, 412(6849), 816-819. Lopez-Barrera, F., Manson, R. H., González-Espinosa, M., & Newton, A. C. (2007). Effects of varying forest edge permeability on seed dispersal in a neotropical montane forest. Landscape Ecology, 22(2), 189-203. Møller, A. P. (1987). Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the swallow, Hirundo rustica. Animal Behaviour, 35(3), 819-832. Minias, P., Gach, K., Włodarczyk, R., Bartos, M., Drzewińska-Chańko, J., Rembowski, M., . . . Janiszewski, T. (2020). Colony size as a predictor of breeding behaviour in a common waterbird. Plos one, 15(11), e0241602. Mougeot, F., & Bretagnolle, V. (2000). Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals. Animal Behaviour, 60(5), 647-656. Ottvall, R., Larsson, K., & Smith, H. G. (2005). Nesting success in Redshank Tringa totanus breeding on coastal meadows and the importance of habitat features used as perches by avian predators. Bird Study, 52(3), 289-296. Parker, M. W., Kress, S. W., Golightly, R. T., Carter, H. R., Parsons, E. B., Schubel, S. E., . . . Wisely, S. M. (2007). Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds, 30(1), 17-28. Peron, G., Lebreton, J. D., & Crochet, P. A. (2010). Costs and benefits of colony size vary during the breeding cycle in Black-headed Gulls Chroicocephalus ridibundus. Journal of Ornithology, 151(4), 881-888. Portillo, J. T. d. M., Barbo, F. E., & Sawaya, R. J. (2021). Climatic niche breadths of the Atlantic Forest snakes do not increase with increasing latitude. Current Zoology. Ramesh, T., Hussain, K. J., Satpathy, K., & Selvanayagam, M. (2013). Community composition and distribution of herpetofauna at Kalpakkam Nuclear campus, Southern India. Herpetology Notes, 6, 343-351. Roberts, G. (1995). A real-time response of vigilance behaviour to changes in group size. Animal Behaviour, 50(5), 1371-1374. Rolland, C., Danchin, E., & Fraipont, M. d. (1998). The evolution of coloniality in birds in relation to food, habitat, predation, and life-history traits: a comparative analysis. The American Naturalist, 151(6), 514-529. Santema, P., Griffith, S. C., Langmore, N. E., Komdeur, J., & Magrath, M. J. L. (2009). Does foraging efficiency vary with colony size in the fairy martin Petrochelidon ariel? Journal of Avian Biology, 40(1), 57-66. Santema, P., Schlicht, L., Beck, K. B., Sheldon, B. C., & Kempenaers, B. (2021). Why do nestling birds fledge early in the day? Animal Behaviour, 174, 79-86. Saunders, S. P., Roche, E. A., Arnold, T. W., & Cuthbert, F. J. (2012). Female Site Familiarity Increases Fledging Success in Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus). The Auk, 129(2), 329-337. Serrano, D., Forero, M. G., Donázar, J. A., & Tella, J. L. (2004). Dispersal and social attraction affect colony selection and dynamics of lesser kestrels. Ecology, 85(12), 3438-3447. Switzer, P. V. (1993). Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evolutionary Ecology, 7(6), 533-555. Switzer, P. V. (1997). Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40(5), 307-312. Szép, T., & Møller, A. (2000). Exposure to ectoparasites increases within-brood variability in size and body mass in the sand martin. Oecologia, 125(2), 201-207. Tella, J. (1996). Ecological constraints, costs and benefits of coloniality in the lesser kestrel. PhD diss. University of Barcelona. Tella, J. L. (2002). The evolutionary transition to coloniality promotes higher blood parasitism in birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15(1), 32-41. Thorup, K., Alerstam, T., Hake, M., & Kjellén, N. (2003). Bird orientation: compensation for wind drift in migrating raptors is age dependent. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(suppl_1), S8-S11. VanderWerf, E. A., Young, L. C., Kohley, C. R., Dalton, M. E., Fisher, R., Fowlke, L., . . . Dittmar, E. (2019). Establishing Laysan and black-footed albatross breeding colonies using translocation and social attraction. Global Ecology and Conservation, 19, e00667. Wang, Y. P., Siefferman, L., Wang, Y. J., Ding, T. S., Chiou, C. R., Shieh, B. S., . . . Yuan, H. W. (2009). Nest site restoration increases the breeding density of blue-tailed bee-eaters. Biological Conservation, 142(8), 1748-1753. Ward, P., & Zahavi, A. (1973). The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information‐centres” for food‐finding. Ibis, 115(4), 517-534. Weaver, H. B., & Brown, C. R. (2005). Colony size, reproductive success, and colony choice in Cave Swallows Petrochelidon fulva. Ibis, 147(2), 381-390. Wiklund, C. G., & Andersson, M. (1994). Natural selection of colony size in a passerine bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 765-774. Yousefi, M., Kafash, A., Khani, A., & Nabati, N. (2020). Applying species distribution models in public health research by predicting snakebite risk using venomous snakes’ habitat suitability as an indicating factor. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-11. Zeger, S. L., & Karim, M. R. (1991). Generalized linear models with random effects; a Gibbs sampling approach. Journal of the American statistical association, 86(413), 79-86. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86431 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 栗喉蜂虎(Merops philippinus)是金門的夏候鳥,由於金門為牠們在台灣唯一的繁殖地,金門國家公園管理處於2002年開始為牠們營造人工生殖坡面。本研究欲了解生殖群規模不同,是否會對天敵有不同的吸引力,進而對栗喉蜂虎的生殖表現造成影響;此外也探討人工坡面的形質如何影響栗喉蜂虎的生殖表現。本研究於2016、2020及2021年6-7月,量測慈湖三角堡、青年農莊和青青農場裡各人工坡面的形質(巢間距離、坡面高度、裸露帶寬度與最近高點距離),共調查21個栗喉蜂虎生殖群的生殖成功、個體產出子代數與個體離巢時間;另於2020和2021年6-7月,監測天敵(鼠與蛇類、鳥類)在各坡面出現的頻率。 21個生殖群規模在2-560巢之間,我發現12個生殖群整體生殖成功高於90%,顯示在調查期間生殖成功和生殖群規模無顯著關係(r2 = 0.0721,p = 0.239)。然而生殖群規模增加,個體平均產出子代數減少(p = 0.011),且有較早離巢的趨勢(p = 0.032)。在天敵監測結果,鼠與蛇天敵出現頻率極低(0-0.08隻次/天),鳥類天敵出現頻率則與生殖群規模呈顯著正相關(r2 = 0.4266,p = 0.0213)。在坡面形質部分,產出子代數與坡面高度(1.7-4m)呈顯著正相關(p = 0.008),離巢時間則與最近高點距離(0.5-31m)呈現顯著負相關(p = 0.011)。鼠與蛇類天敵為主要影響栗喉蜂虎生殖成功的因子,本研究推測鼠與蛇出現與否和周遭環境有關,而與生殖群規模無關。分析結果與野外觀察經驗皆顯示,栗喉蜂虎優先選擇高度高或面積大的坡面,一方面是大坡面有較多棲地忠實性個體而產生較強的社會性吸引,另一方面是由於大坡面及大生殖群較能減少天敵威脅,使栗喉蜂虎容忍生殖群規模大帶來的缺點,如體外寄生蟲與疾病。藉由了解生殖群規模對栗喉蜂虎生殖表現的影響,除了提供坡面營造建議,更期望運用於其他集體營巢鳥種的棲地經營管理。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Blue-tailed Bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) are summer migrant birds on Kinmen island. Since Kinmen is their only breeding area in Taiwan, Kinmen National Park has been building artificial sand slopes to facilitate the burrow for breeding since 2002. The purposes of this research are to understand the relationship between the colony size and breeding performance of Blue-tailed Bee-eater whether predators are likely to appear more in bigger colonies, and to comprehend how artificial slope characteristics influence their breeding performance. Data was collected from 21 breeding colonies, located in Triangle Fort, Qingnian Farm, and Qingqing Farm during June to July of 2016, 2020, and 2021. Breeding success, fledging number, fledging date, and morphology parameters were included. Frequency of predators (rodents, snakes, and predatory birds) appearance was monitored in years 2020 and 2021. The range of colony size in this study was 2-560 nests per colony. There was no statistically significant correlation between colony size and breeding success since the success rates of 12 colonies were higher than 90% (r2 = 0.0721,p = 0.239). In contrast with an increasing colony size, the average fledging number decreased (p = 0.011), and fledging date became earlier (p = 0.032). Rodent and snake predators were remarkably low in terms of appearance frequency (0-0.08 individual per day). Nonetheless, avian predator appearance frequency had positive correlation to the colony size (r2 = 0.4266,p = 0.0213). Fledging number was positively correlated with slope height (1.7-4m) (p = 0.008) and fledging date was negatively correlated with the distance to the nearest tree (0.5-31 m) (p = 0.011). Predators, such as rats and snakes, was the main factor affecting reproductive success of Blue-tailed Bee-eater. Their presence was considered to be related to the surrounding environment rather than colony size. Both analysis results and field observations suggested that Blue-tailed Bee-eaters preferred taller and larger slopes. Majority of the bee-eaters are more attracted to the larger and taller slopes due to site fidelity and social attraction characteristic. Furthermore, predator avoidance allows them to tolerate the disadvantages caused by larger colony size, such as ectoparasites and disease. By understanding the effects of colony size on the reproductive performance of Blue-tailed Bee-eater, this research not only provides advice on slope building, but also could be applied to habitat management of other colonial breeding birds. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:55:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1808202217225200.pdf: 2576025 bytes, checksum: 8f29b7b828c99ac9574992868f03ec21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I 摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 前言 1 研究方法 7 一、研究物種 7 二、研究樣區 7 三、生殖監測 8 四、天敵監測 10 五、坡面形質量測 10 六、統計方法 11 研究結果 13 一、生殖群規模與坡面形質 13 二、生殖表現 13 三、天敵出現頻率 14 討論 15 一、生殖群規模與坡面形質 15 二、天敵影響 16 三、生殖群規模的負面影響 17 四、經營管理 19 結論 21 引用文獻 22 圖 29 表 36 附錄 43 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 金門栗喉蜂虎生殖群規模對生殖成功之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Colony Size on Breeding Success of Blue-tailed Bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) in Kinmen | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王穎(Ying Wang),丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su Ding),蔡若詩(Jo-Szu Tsai) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 集體營巢,天敵,子代數,棲地經營管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | colonial breeding,predator,fledging number,fledging number, | en |
dc.relation.page | 45 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202555 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-30 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1808202217225200.pdf | 2.52 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。