請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86261完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭舒婷(Su-Ting Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rui-Qi Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳睿騏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:45:28Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王壽兵。(2003)。對傳統生物多樣性指數的質疑。復旦學報 (自然科學版)，42(6)，867-868。 邱清安, 林鴻志, 廖敏君, 曾彥學, 歐辰雄, 呂金誠, & 曾喜育。(2008)。臺灣潛在植群形相分類方案。林業研究季刊, 30(4), 89-111。 黃煦雰, & 盧光輝。(2012)。台灣都市生態化程度之研究。海峡两岸环境与资源学术研讨会暨中国环境资源与生态保育学会会员代表大会，254-271。 葛兆年, 李培芬, & 邱祈榮。(2008)。破碎棲地之面積, 孤離度與棲地異質度對都市地景之鳥類群聚組成之影響-以台北市公園綠地為例。都市與計劃, 35(2), 141-154。 臺北市動物保護處。(2006)。台北市生物多樣性資料庫。民 109 年 11 月 19 日，取自：https://biodiv.gov.taipei/BiodivIntro/TaipeiBiodiv 臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處（民 107 年 10 月 31 日）。公園情報統計資料。民 110 年 1 月 3 日，取自：https://parks.taipei/parks/ Almeida‐Gomes, M., Gotelli, N. J., Frederico Duarte Rocha, C., Vinícius Vieira, M., & Augusto Prevedello, J. (2022). Random placement models explain species richness and dissimilarity of frog assemblages within Atlantic Forest fragments. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13660 Almeida‐Neto, M., Guimaraes, P., Guimaraes Jr, P. R., Loyola, R. D., & Ulrich, W. (2008). A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos, 117(8), 1227-1239. Almeida-Neto, M., & Ulrich, W. (2011). A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.003 Apfelbeck, B., Snep, R. P., Hauck, T. E., Ferguson, J., Holy, M., Jakoby, C., ... & Weisser, W. W. (2020). Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support humananimal co-existence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, 103817. Atmar, W., & Patterson, B. D. (1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia, 96(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317508 Axelsson, E. P., & Andersson, J. (2012). A case study of termite mound occurrence in relation to forest edges and canopy cover within the Barandabhar forest corridor in Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 4(15), 633-641. Badamasi, M. M., Yelwa, S. A., AbdulRahim, M. A., & Noma, S. S. (2010). NDVI threshold classification and change detection of vegetation cover at the Falgore Game Reserve in Kano State, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of the social sciences, 2(2), 174-194. Berry, B. J. (2008). Urbanization. In Urban ecology (pp. 25-48). Springer, Boston, MA. Carlson, T. N., & Ripley, D. A. (1997). On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote sensing of Environment, 62(3), 241-252. Chen, R. Q., & Cheng, S. T. (in press). Detecting Nestedness in City Parks for Urban Biodiversity Conservation. Urban Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01272-1 Coleman, B. D., Mares, M. A., Willig, M. R., & Hsieh, Y. H. (1982). Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecology, 63(4), 1121-1133. Cook, R. R., & Quinn, J. F. (1995). The influence of colonization in nested species subsets. Oecologia, 102(4), 413-424. Curran, P. A. (2014). Monte Carlo error analyses of Spearman's rank test. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.3816. Cutler, A. H. (1994). Nested biotas and biological conservation: Metrics, mechanisms, and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90045-0 Dennis, R. L. H., & Eales, H. T. (1997). Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018455714879 Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., ... & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46. Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (1964). Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 586-608. Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2002). Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a “black box” can lead to false conclusions. Oikos, 99(1), 193-199. Fleishman, E., Betrus, C. J., Blair, R. B., Mac Nally, R., & Murphy, D. D. (2002). Nestedness analysis and conservation planning: the importance of place, environment, and life history across taxonomic groups. Oecologia, 133(1), 78-89. Gamon, J. A., Field, C. B., Goulden, M. L., Griffin, K. L., Hartley, A. E., Joel, G., ... & Valentini, R. (1995). Relationships between NDVI, canopy structure, and photosynthesis in three Californian vegetation types. Ecological Applications, 5(1), 28-41. González-Oreja, J. A., De La Fuente-Díaz-Ordaz, A. A., Hernández-Santín, L., Bonache-Regidor, C., & Buzo-Franco, D. (2012). Can human disturbance promote nestedness? Songbirds and noise in urban parks as a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.001 González-Oreja, J. A., Zuria, I., Carbó-Ramírez, P., & Charre, G. M. (2018). Using variation partitioning techniques to quantify the effects of invasive alien species on native urban bird assemblages. Biological Invasions, 20(10), 2861-2874. Habel, J. C., Samways, M. J., & Schmitt, T. (2019). Mitigating the precipitous decline of terrestrial European insects: Requirements for a new strategy. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(6), 1343-1360. Hecnar, S. J., Casper, G. S., Russell, R. W., Hecnar, D. R., & Robinson, J. N. (2002). Nested species assemblages of amphibians and reptiles on islands in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Biogeography, 29(4), 475-489. Huang, C., Wylie, B., Yang, L., Homer, C., & Zylstra, G. (2002). Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. International journal of remote sensing, 23(8), 1741-1748. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 112, p. 59-127). New York: springer. Keten, A., Eroglu, E., Kaya, S., & Anderson, J. T. (2020). Bird diversity along a riparian corridor in a moderate urban landscape. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106751 Kohsaka, R., Pereira, H. M., Elmqvist, T., Chan, L., Moreno-Peñaranda, R., Morimoto, Y., ... & Pearsell, G. (2013). Indicators for management of urban biodiversity and ecosystem services: City Biodiversity Index. In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities (pp. 699-718). Springer, Dordrecht. Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., & MacIvor, J. S. (2017). Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 67(9), 799-807.Li, C. F., Chytrý, M., Zelený, D., Chen, M. Y., Chen, T. Y., Chiou, C. R., ... & Hsieh, C.F. (2013). Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science, 16(4), 698-719. Manville, R. H., & Darlington, P. J. (1958). Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. Journal of Mammalogy, 39(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.2307/1376223 Martensen, A. C., Pimentel, R. G., & Metzger, J. P. (2008). Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 141(9), 2184–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.008 McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann‐Whitney U Test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-1. Oliveira, B. F., & Scheffers, B. R. (2019). Vertical stratification influences global patterns of biodiversity. Ecography, 42(2), 249-249. Pagel, J., Martínez-Abraín, A., Gómez, J. A., Jiménez, J., & Oro, D. (2014). A long-termmacroecological analysis of the recovery of a waterbird metacommunity after site protection. PLOS ONE, 9(8), e105202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105202 Patterson, B. D., & Atmar, W. (1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological journal of the Linnean society, 28(1-2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1986.tb01749.x Patterson, B. D., & Brown, J. H. (1991). Regionally nested patterns of species composition in granivorous rodent assemblages. Journal of Biogeography, 395-402. Pinheiro, R. B., Felix, G. M., Dormann, C. F., & Mello, M. A. (2019). A new model explaining the origin of different topologies in interaction networks. Ecology, 100(9), e02796. Pinheiro, R. B. P., Dormann, C. F., Felix, G. M., & Mello, M. A. (2021). A novel perspective on the meaning of nestedness with conceptual and methodological solutions. bioRxiv. Platt, A., & Lill, A. (2006). Composition and conservation value of bird assemblages ofurban ‘habitat islands’: Do pedestrian traffic and landscape variables exert an influence?. Urban Ecosystems, 9(2), 83-97. Qian, H., Wang, X., Wang, S., & Li, Y. (2007). Environmental determinants of amphibian and reptile species richness in China. Ecography, 30(4), 471-482. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Redlands, C. E. S. R. I. (2019). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.7. Rouse Jr, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation (No. NASA-CR-132982). Schouten, M. A., Verweij, P. A., Barendregt, A., Kleukers, R. J. M., & De Ruiter, P. C.(2007). Nested assemblages of Orthoptera species in the Netherlands: the importance of habitat features and life‐history traits. Journal of Biogeography, 34(11), 1938-1946. Shanahan, D. F., Miller, C., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2011). The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biological Conservation, 144(2), 722–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.014 Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423. Simberloff, D., & Cox, J. (1987). Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation biology, 1(1), 63-71. Simberloff, D., & Gotelli, N. (1984). Effects of insularisation on plant species richness in the prairie-forest ecotone. Biological Conservation, 29(1), 27-46. Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. nature, 163(4148), 688-688. Ulrich, W., & Gotelli, N. J. (2007). Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology, 88(7), 1824-1831. Ulrich, W., Almeida‐Neto, M., & Gotelli, N. J. (2009). A consumer's guide to nestednessanalysis. Oikos, 118(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17053.x Ulrich, W. (2009). Nestedness analysis as a tool to identify ecological gradients. Ecological Questions, 11, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.12775/v10090-009-0015-y United Nations. (2018). World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. U.S. Geological Survey, 2021, EarthExplorer, accessed September 17, 2021 at URL https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ Vázquez, D. P., Melián, C. J., Williams, N. M., Blüthgen, N., Krasnov, B. R., & Poulin, R. (2007). Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos, 116(7), 1120-1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15828.x Wang, X., Wang, Y. P., & Ding, P. (2012). Nested species subsets of amphibians and reptiles in Thousand Island Lake. Wilson, E. O., & MacArthur, R. H. (1967). The theory of island biogeography (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86261 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 都市化常造成自然環境改變，影響原先物種的組成與生存，導致多樣性降低。在維護生態上，都市綠地扮演至關重要的角色。本研究為探討都市綠地對於動物群集的影響，選取於台北市公園自2008年至2020年鳥類、蝴蝶、爬蟲類、蛙類群集生態調查資料有交集之 16 處公園，進行嵌套結構分析，以瞭解臺北市各公園綠地群集的相互隸屬程度，並利用斯皮爾曼相關性分析與雙樣本中位數差異檢定，檢視都市綠地對於嵌套結構及物種組成的影響性。研究結果顯示臺北市公園中的鳥類、蝴蝶、爬蟲類、蛙類均具有顯著的嵌套結構，儘管少部分物種有獨特的棲息偏好，但整體而言公園綠地可幫助整體群集存續，而棲地破碎化引起之邊緣效應則出現負相關。此外，移動能力較低的爬蟲類與蛙類有較強的嵌套結構，需更加審慎考量開發與棲地破碎化對群集造成的影響。根據此研究結果，建議保存或營造可供生物利用之水域及面積大、邊緣比例小的綠地，並營造多層林相結構、廣為種植原生樹木與蜜源植物，增進公園內現存植被的綠地品質，增強公園綠地在都市中維護生物多樣性的潛力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Urbanization often causes changes in the natural environments, affects species composition and survival, and results in biodiversity reduction. Urban green space plays a critical role in biodiversity conservation. To investigate the influence of urban green space on community ecology, this study applied the nestedness analysis using the ecological survey data of birds, butterflies, reptiles, and frogs across 16 parks in the Taipei city from 2008 to 2020, to understand the affiliation of the inhabitant metacommunities in these parks. Then, I performed the Spearman’s rank correlation test and Mann-Whitney U test to investigate influence of urban green space on nestedness and species composition. Results found that birds, butterflies, reptiles, and frogs have significant nestedness among these parks. Although few species appeared unique habitat preferences, in general, parks and green spaces possessed a positive influence on the incidence of the community, while the fragmentation-induced edge effects showed a negative correlation. Besides, groups with lower mobility showed stronger nestedness, such like reptiles and frogs. This calls for careful consideration of urban development and habitat fragmentation on their impacts to these communities. Based on the results, during park planning and design, I suggest preserving or creating water zones and green space with large areas and low boundary proportion, improving the quality of the existing vegetation within parks by creating multilayer forest forms and planting native vegetation or nectariferous plants. These applications can help enhance the potential of parks in conserving biodiversity in urban areas. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:45:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2708202223534700.pdf: 3060041 bytes, checksum: 0d7aa9e6df95ee54aa780f0ae7700df1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I 摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第壹章 前言 1 第貳章 材料與方法 5 第一節 樣區介紹 5 第二節 物種組成資料與物種棲地矩陣構成 7 第三節 生物多樣性指數 (biodiversity index) 9 第四節 隨機配置檢定(random placement) 11 第五節 嵌套結構分析(nestedness analysis) 13 一、 NODF (Nestedness metric based on overlap and decreasing fill) 13 二、 WNODA (Weighted nestedness based on overlap and decreasing abundance) 14 三、 隨機模擬(permutation) 15 第六節 環境因子選定 (selection of environmental factors) 16 第七節 斯皮爾曼相關性分析(Spearman’s rank correlation test) 18 第八節 雙樣本中位數差異檢定(Mann-Whitney U test) 19 第參章 結果 20 第一節 物種組成及環境因子概況 20 第二節 隨機配置檢定結果 23 第三節 生物多樣性指數變化趨勢 24 一、 Shannon’s diversity index 24 二、 Simpson’s diversity index 25 第四節 嵌套結構指數變化趨勢 26 一、 NODF 26 二、 WNODA 28 第五節 斯皮爾曼相關性分析結果 30 第六節 雙樣本中位數差異檢定(Mann-Whitney U test)結果 31 一、 鳥類 31 二、 蝴蝶 34 三、 爬蟲類 36 四、 蛙類 37 第肆章 討論 38 第一節 臺北市都市綠地群集間是否具有顯著嵌套結構 38 第二節 原生物種在臺北市都市綠地間的群集隸屬程度與多樣性變化 39 第三節 影響嵌套結構及物種存續狀況之環境因子 40 第四節 都市規劃與綠地營造相關建議 44 第伍章 結論與建議 45 引用文獻 46 附錄一 嵌套圖 54 附錄二 完整篩選物種存續狀況受環境因子的影響情形 56 附錄三 臺北市生物多樣性物種調查名錄資訊 62 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 都市化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 嵌套結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 棲地破碎化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 群集生態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公園綠地 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | habitat fragmentation | en |
| dc.subject | nestedness | en |
| dc.subject | green space | en |
| dc.subject | urbanization | en |
| dc.subject | community ecology | en |
| dc.title | 以嵌套結構檢視都市綠地對群集生態的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigating the Influence of Urban Green Space on Community Ecology by Nestedness Analysis | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳子英(Tze-Ying Chen),楊嘉棟(Jia-Dong Yang),葛兆年(Chao-Nien Koh),許立達(Li-Ta Hsu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 嵌套結構,公園綠地,都市化,群集生態,棲地破碎化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | nestedness,green space,urbanization,community ecology,habitat fragmentation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202888 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-02 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2708202223534700.pdf | 2.99 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。