請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86106
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張文貞 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Wen-Chen Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐瀅珊 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Stephanie Y.S. Hsu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:37:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abi-saab, Georges (2006). Conclusions, in Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 470
Accinelli, Robert (1996). Crisis and commitment: United States policy toward Taiwan, 1950-1955 162,174. Adams, Willi Paul (1980). The First American Constitutions: Republican Ideology and the Making of the State Constitutions in the Revolutionary Era 137. Aikman, C.C. (1967). Parliament in J.L. Robson (eds.), New Zealand: The Development of its Laws and its Constitution, 40- 55 (2nd ed.). Allott, A.N. (1969). Boundaries and the Law in Africa, in African Boundary Problems, 15 (C.G. Widstrand eds.). Anderson, Benedict (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Anderson, Ronald Stone (1946). Formosa under the Japanese: A Record of Fifty Years’Occupation 63. Andrade, Tonio (2006), The Rise and Fall of Dutch Taiwan, 1624-1662: Cooperative Colonization and the Statist Model of European Expansion, Journal of World History, 17(4), 429- 30. -(2008). How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han Colonization in the Seventeenth Century 41. -(2011). Lost Colony: The Untold Story of China’s First Great Victory over the West 202. Andrews, Robert & Chabot, Steve (2004). Two Congressmen Look at “One China”, Heritage Foundation Lecture No.821, https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/two-congressmen-look-one-china Ansong, Alex (2012). The Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law, 20. Araujo, Father Robert (2000). Sovereignty, Human Rights, and Self-Determination: The Meaning of International Law, Fordham International Law Journal, 24, 1477-92. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144222315.pdf Atwell, William (1998). Ming China and the Emerging World Economy, c. 1470-1650, in The Cambridge History of China, 8, 376-416 (Denis Twitchett and Frederick W. Mote ed.). Barclay, Paul D. (2017). Outcasts of Empire: Japan’s Rule on the “Savage Border,” 1874–1945 114–61. Baty, T. (1921). Sovereign colonies, 34 (8), 837- 43. Beck, L. Doswald (1985). The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government, British Year Book of International Law, 56, 197 Best, Antony (2011). On the Fringes of Diplomacy: Influences on British Foreign Policy, 1800-1945 185. Bhandari, Surendra (2014). Self-Determination & Constitution Making in Nepal 135. Blackwill, Robert D. & Zelikow, Philip (2021). The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War, Council on Foreign Relations Special Report No. 90, 29. Blum, Yehuda Z. (1975). Reflections on the Changing Concept of Self-Determination, Israel law Review, 10, 509-11. Blussé, Leonard (1996), No Boats to China: The Dutch East India Company and the Changing Pattern of the China Sea Trade, 1635–1690, Modern Asian Studies, 30 (1) , 51, 71. Bluth, Christoph (2008). Korea 12. Bodin,Jean(1967). Six Books of the Commonwealth. https://www.yorku.ca/comninel/courses/3020pdf/six_books.pdf Boxer, C.R. (1959). The Great Ship from Amacon: Annals of Macao and the old Japan Trade, 1555-1640 44. Brierly, J. L. (1963). Law of Nations 139 (6th ed.). Brown, Mellisa J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities, 211. Brown, P. (1942). The Effects of Recognition, American Journal of International Law, 36, 107. Brownlie, Ian (1963).The relations of nationality in public international law, British Year Book of International Law, 39, 284, 320. - (1963). International Law and the Use of Force by State 349, 379–83 - (1973). Principles of Public International Law 76 (2nd ed.). - (1998). Principles of international law 599 (5th ed.). - (2003). Principles of Public International Law 77 (6th ed.). Bühler, Konrad (2001). State Succession and Membership in International Organizations: Legal Theories versus Political Pragmatism 10-15. Burant, Stephen R. (1988). East Germany: A Country Study 38. Burr, William (1999). Kissinger Transcripts: The Top-Secret Talks with Beijing And Moscow, Baltic Yearbook of International Law, 167, 171–6. Bush, Richard & Hass, Ryan (2018). Taiwan’s democracy and the China Challenge, Brookings,https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/FP_20190226_taiwan_bush_hass.pdf Busquets, Anne (2016). Nine Dreams in the Chinese Periphery: Victorio Riccio and Zheng Chenggong’s Regime, in Sea Rovers, Silver, and Samurai: Maritime East Asia in Global History, 1550–1700, 202- 5 (Andrade et al ed.). Braune, Andreas (2020). Authoritative Constitution-Making in the Name of Democracy? In Richard Albert & Yaniv Roznai(eds), Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions Law, Emergency, Exception: Law, Emergency, Exception, 323-4. Breuilly, John (2016). Benedict Anderson’s imagined communities: a symposium. Nations and Nationalism 17. Brink, T. Ten (2011). Institutional Change in Market-Liberal State Capitalism: An Integrative Perspective on the Development of the Private Business Sector in China, file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Institutional_Change_in_Market-Liberal_State_Capit.pdf Burr, William (1999). Kissinger Transcripts: The Top Secret Talks with Beijing And Moscow 464. Buzo, Adrian (2002). The Making of Modern Korea (Asia’s Transformations) 59 (1sted.). Cabestan, Jean-Pierre (2001). France’s Taiwan Policy: A case of shopkeeper diplomacy. Paper presented at The Role of France and Germany in Sino-European Relations, Hong Kong Baptist University, June 22-23, at 14-5. https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/sites/sciencespo.fr.ceri/files/jpcabest.pdf Capoccia, Giovanni (2005). Defending democracy: Reactions to extremism in interwar Europe, 180 Garver, John W. (1997). Face Off; China, the United States and Taiwan’s Democratization 79. Chabot, Steve (2004). Confronting reality: There are Two Chinas, in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China”, 11-5. Campbell, William (1903). Formosa under the Dutch: described from contemporary records, with explanatory notes and a bibliography of the island 6–7. -(1967). Formosa under the Dutch 318-328, 383-492. Cassese, Antonio (1981), The Self-Determination of Peoples, in Louis Henkin (ed.), The International Bill of Rights. - (1988), Violence and Law in the Modern Age. - (1995). Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal, 120. Cats-Baril, Amanda (2018), Self-determination, https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/self-determination-constitution-brief.pdf Conkin, Paul K. (1974). Self-Evident Truths: Being a Discourse on the Origins & Development of the First Principles of American Government—Popular Sovereignty, Natural Rights, and Balance & Separation of Powers 52. Chang, Carsun (1952). The third force in China 236. Chang, David W. (1965). US Aid and Economic Progress in Taiwan, Asian Survey, 5 (3), 152-3. Chang, Jaw-ling Joanne (1986). United State–-China Normalization: An Evaluation of Foreign Policy Decision Making 121-30. Chen, Ketty W. (2008). Disciplining Taiwan: The Kuomintang’s Methods of Control during the White Terror Era (1947-1987), Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 4(4), 185, and 205. Cheng, Weichung (2013) .War, Trade, and Piracy in the China Seas, 1622–1683, 241. -(2016). Thirteen Admiral Shi Lang’s Secret Proposal to Return Taiwan to the VOC, in Sea Rovers, Silver, and Samurai: Maritime East Asia in Global History, 1550–1700, 290, 298 (Andrade et al ed.). Chiang, Frank (2017). The One-China Policy: State, Sovereignty, and Taiwan’s International Legal Status. Ching, Leo (2000). Globalizing the regional, regionalizing the global: mass culture and Arianism in the age of late capital, Public Culture, 12(1), 233, 252. Christensen, Thomas J. (1996). Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization and Sino-American Conflict, 1947-1958 chapter 6. Christakis, Theodore (2006). The State as a “primary fact”: some thoughts on the principle of effectiveness, in Secession: International Law Perspectives, 137 (Marcelo G. Kohen ed.). Clough, Ralph (1978). Island China 23-4. Craven, M.C.R. (1998). The problem of state succession and the identity of states under international law, European Journal of International Law, 9(1), 142,160. Crawford, James R. (1976). The Criteria for Statehood in International Law, British Year Book of International Law, 48 (1), 95-6. - (1979). The Creation of States in International Law, 105–6. -(1996). The General Assembly, the International Court and Self-determination, in Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice 585,601 (Lowe and Fitzmaurice eds.). - (2007). The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed.). Christie, Clive J. (1998). A Modern History of Southeast Asia: Decolonization, Nationalism and Separatism 225. Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History 281-2. Chang, Lung-chih (2003). From Frontier Island to Imperial Colony: Qing and Japanese Sovereignty Debates and Territorial Projects, 1874–1906, PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 62-9. Chang, Wen-Chen (2009). East Asian Foundations for Constitutionalism: Three Models Reconstructed, National Taiwan University Law Review, 3, 111, 121 – 23. -(2011). Public-Interest Litigation in Taiwan: Strategy for Law and Policy Reforms in Course of Democratization, in P. J. Yap and H. Lau (eds.), Public Interest Litigation in Asia,136-9 Chikamatsu, Monzaemon, Van Doren, Mark and Keene, Donald (1951). The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu’s Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance 45. Ching, Leo (2001). Becoming Japanese: Colonial Taiwan and the Politics of Identity Formation 211. Chu, Y-H (2004). Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations, Asian Survey, 44(4), 497. Cullather, Nick (1996). Fuel for the Good Dragon: The United States and Industrial Policy in Taiwan, 1950–1965, Diplomatic History, 20, 1, 6. Charney, J. I. & Prescott, J. R. V. (2000). Resolving Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan, American Journal of International Law, 94,453. Chen, Edward –te (1970). Japanese Colonialism in Korea and Formosa: A Comparison of the Systems of Political Control, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 30, 132,137. Chen, Lung-chu & Reisman, W.M. (1972). Who owns Taiwan: a search for international title, 81Yale Law Journal, 599, 611, https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1867&context=fac_articles_chapters Chen, Lung-chu (2016). The US-Taiwan-China Relationship in International Law and Policy. Chiu, Hung & Fa, Jyh-pin (1998). Law and Justice Since 1966, in James C. Hsiung &James Chieh Hsiung (eds.), The Taiwan experience, 1950-1980: Contemporary Republic of China 315-6. Chou, Wan-yao (1996). The Kominka Movement in Taiwan and Korea: Comparisons and Interpretations, in Peter Duus, Ramon H. Myers, and Mark R. Peattie ( eds.), The Japanese Wartime Empire, 1931-1945, 40-2. Colvin, E. (1982). Constitutional Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court Law Review, 4, 3, 7. Corwin, David. M. (1987). China's Choices: The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Its Aftermath, Law& Policy in International Business, 19(1), 505, 510 Dagati, Patricia A. (1992). Hong Kong’s lost right to self-determination: A denial of due process in the United Nations, New York Law School Journal of International and comparative law, 13 (1), 153-79. Daly, Tom Gerald (2020). Introduction: constitution-making and constitutional change, in Richard Albert & Yaniv Roznai(eds), Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions Law, Emergency, Exception: Law, Emergency, Exception, 315-8. Darwin, John (1999). A Third British Empire? The Dominion Idea in Imperial Politics, in Judith M. Brown & William Roger Louis (eds.), The Oxford History of the British Empire: The Twentieth Century, 85. -(2009). The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World-System, 1830–1970 407,561. Davidson, James Wheeler (1903). The Island of Formosa, Past and Present: History, People, Resources, and Commercial Prospects 67. Dawisha, Karen & Parrott, Bruce (1994). Russia, the New States of Eurasia: The Politics of Upheaval 85 (1st ed.). De la Cuba, Pablo Moscoso (2011). The Statehood of “Collapsed” States in Public International Law, Agenda International, 18(29), 121. Dicey, A.V. (1959). An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 41 (10th ed.). Driest, van den (2013). Remedial Secession: A right to external self-determination as a remedy to serious injustices 14-32. - (2015). Crimea’s Separation from Ukraine: An Analysis of the Right to Self-Determination and (Remedial) Secession in International Law, Netherlands International Law Review ,62, 329, 351 Dinstein, Yoram (1994). War, Aggression and Self-Defence (2nd ed.) Distefano, Giovanni (2009). Theories on Territorial Sovereignty: A Reappraisal, Journal of Sharia and Law, 41, 25-47 Distefano, Giovanni (2019). Fundamentals of Public International Law: a Sketch of the International Legal Order 137. Donnelly, Thomas (2004). Cognitive dissonance: China and the Bush Doctrine, in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China”, 49-57. Dube, Brian, Manatsa, Proceed and Dziva, Cowen (2013). Failed State Discourse under International Law: the Place, Attributes and Implications, International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 4(4.4), 12. http://www.onlineresearchjournals.com/ijopagg/art/141.pdf Dugard, J. (1987). Recognition and the United Nations 97–8. Dugard, John & Raic, David (2006). The role of recognition in the law and practice of secession, in Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 94,109, 135-6 Dumberry, Patrick (2006). Lessons learned from the Quebec Secession Reference before the Supreme Court of Canada, in Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 416,440. Eagleton, Clyde (1957). International Government 82–3 (3rd ed). Elias, T.O. (1980). The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law, American International Law Journal, 74(2), 285, 291. Elliott, Mark C. (2011). Review of Pei Huang Reorienting the Manchus: A Study of Sinicization, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 54, 584- 5. Elliott, William Y. (1938). The Constitution as the American Social Myth, in Conyers Read (ed.), The Constitution Reconsidered, 209. Elster, Jon (1995). Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process, Duke Law Journal, 45, 364–96. -(2000). Ulysess Unbound 89. Espinosa, J.F.E. (2017). Self-Determination and Humanitarian Secession in International Law of a Globalized World 14. Evans, G. (1977). Changing the System, in S. Encel, D. Horne and E. Thompson (eds.), Changing the Rules: Towards a Democratic Constitution, 158 . Ermakoff, Ivan (2008). Ruling Oneself Out. A Theory of Collective Abdications, Chap. 6 -(2018). Frail democracy, in Afshin Ellian & Bastiaan Rijpkema (eds.), Militant Democracy – Political Science, Law and Philosophy, 51-7. Fawcett, J. E. S. (1965–1966). Security Council Resolutions on Rhodesia, British Yearbook of International Law, 41,103, 112-3. Feis, Herbert (1953). China Tangle: The American Effort in China from Pearl Harbor to the Marshall Mission 274. Feng-Fu Tsao (2000). Language Policy and Language Education in Taiwan, in Wo Wah Kam & Ruth L. Wong(eds.), Language Policy and Language Education in East Asia, 285, 288 Flynn, Dennis O. & Giraldez, Arturo (1995). Arbitrage, China, and World Trade in the Early Modern Period, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 38(4), 429 Franck, T.M. &Hoffman, P. (1976). The Right of Self-Determination in Very Small Places, New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, 8, 331. Franck,Thomas M., Higgins,Rosalyn, Pellet,Alain, Shaw,Malcolm N., and Tomuschat,Christian (2000). The Territorial Integrity of Québec in the Event of the Attainment of Sovereignty – Experts Report. In A.F. Bayefski (eds.), Self-Determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned, 248. Garver, John W. (1997). The Sino-American Alliance: Nationalist China and American Cold War Strategy in Asia 24-31. Georges abi-saab (2006). Conclusions, in Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, 470. Ge´rin-Lajoie, Paul (1950). Constitutional Amendment in Canada, Chap1. Gevorgyan, Karen A. (2014). Concept of State Sovereignty: Modern Attitudes 445. https://www.ysu.am/files/Karen_Gevorgyan.pdf Grant, Thomas D. (1999).The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution 103. Grant, Tom (2015), How to recognize state (and not): some practical considerations, in Christine Chinkin &Freya Baetens (eds), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford, 192. Goddard, William G. (1966). Formosa: A study in Chinese history 129. Gould, James Warren (1969). The United States and Malaysia 106. Grad, Andrew Jonah (1942). Formosa Today: An Analysis of the Economic Development and Strategic Importance of Japan's Tropical Colony 16. Gold, Tomas B. (1986). State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle 65. Goldstein, Steven M. (2000), The United States and the Republic of China, 1949–1978: Suspicious Allies . Gordon, Leonard (1968). American planning for Taiwan, 1942-1945, Pacific Historical Review, 37. Green, Thomas Hill (1999). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation 84. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/green/obligation.pdf Grimm, Dieter (2016). Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future. Habermas, J. (2001). Constitutional democracy: a paradoxical union of contradictory principles? Political Theory, 29, 766–81. Hagström, Linus (2008). Sino-Japanese Relations: The ice that won’t melt, International Journal, 64(1), 225. Halbeisen, Hermann (1991). Taiwanese Consciousness (T’ai-wan I-Shih): Facets of a continuing Debate, in E. K. Y. Chen et al (eds.), Taiwan: Economy, Society and History, 235-50. Hales, James C. (1937). Some Legal Aspects of the Mandate System: Sovereignty: Nationality: Termination and Transfer, Transactions of the Grotius Society, 23, 85-110. Hall, H. Duncan (1948). Mandates, Dependences and Trusteeship 265–6. Hang, Xing (2008). A Question of Hairdos and Fashion, 246-280. -(2010). The Zheng “state” on Taiwan: Between Trade and Legitimacy, Maritime and Continent: The Zheng Organization in Seventeenth-Century East Asia, 209. - (2015). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620–1720. - (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia. - (2016). Eleven Bridging the Bipolar: Zheng Jing’s Decade on Taiwan, 1663–1673, in Andrade et al (eds.), Sea Rovers, Silver, and Samurai: Maritime East Asia in Global History, 1550–1700 238, 239. Hampton, J. (1997). Political Philosophy 97. Hannum, Hurst (1990). Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights 30. -(1993). Rethinking Self-Determination, Virginia Journal of International Law, 34, 35. -(2011). The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: An Opportunity Lost, or Poisoned Chalice Refused? Leiden Journal of International Law, 24, 157,161. Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law 103, 245 (2nd ed.) Hauptman, M. Laurence & Knapp, Ronald G. (1977). Dutch-aboriginal interaction in New Netherlands and Formosa: An historical geography of empire, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 121(2), 166, 175. Henkin, L.(1986), The Human Rights Idea in China, in R.R. Edwards, L. Henkin and A.J. Nathan (eds.), Human Rights in Contemporary China, 26-7. Heylen, Ann (2010).The Transnational in Taiwan History: A Preliminary Exploration, Literary and Cultural Studies 36(1), 9, 26, https://www.concentric-literature.url.tw/issues/Transnational%20Taiwan/2.pdf Higgins, R. (1963). The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the UN 110–8. Hirano, Katsuya, Veracini, Lorenzo and Roy, Toulouse-Antonin (2008). Vanishing natives and Taiwan’s settler-colonial unconsciousness, Critical Asian Studies, 50(2). Ho, Dahpon David (2011). Sealords Live in Vain: Fujian and the Making of a Maritime Frontier in Seventeenth-Century China, PhD dissertation, University of California–San Diego. Ho, Samuel P.S. (1979). Decentralized industrialization and rural development: Evidence from Taiwan, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 28(1), 77-96. Hogg, P.W. (1982–3). Patriation of the Canadian Constitution: Has It Been Achieved? Queen’s Law Journal, 8(1&2),123,128. Holmes, Stephen (1995). Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy 235. Hsiau, A-chin (2000). Contemporary Taiwanese culture nationalism 30-4. Hsiao, Frank S. T. & Sullivan, Lawrence R. (1983). A political history of the Taiwanese Communist Party, 1928-1931, Journal of Asian Studies, 4(2), 269-289. Hsieh, Pasha L. (2009).The Taiwan Question and the One-China Policy: Legal Challenges with Renewed Momentum, Die Friedens-Warte, 84(3), 59, 63. Hsu, Wen-Hsiung (1975). The Chinese Colonization of Taiwan, PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, 223-5. -(1980). From aboriginal island to Chinese frontier: the development of Taiwan before 1683, in Ronald G. Knapp (eds.), China’s Island Frontier: Studies in the Historical Geography of Taiwan, 1, 21. Huan, Guo-Cang (1985). Taiwan, A View from Beijing, Foreign Affairs, 63, 1064-6, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/1985-06-01/taiwan-view-Beijing Huang, Jaw-Nian (2017). The China Factor in Taiwan’s Media: Outsourcing Chinese Censorship Abroad, China Perspectives 3, 27-36. Huntington, Samuel P. (1981). American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony 30. -(1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Irving, H. (1999). To Constitute a Nation: A Cultural History of Australia’s Constitution 14. Ismail, F.(1973).The making of the treaty of Bucharest, 1811-1812, Middle Eastern Studies, 15(2),163-192. Jaber, T. (2011). A Case for Kosovo? Self-determination and Secession in the 21st Century, The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(6), 926, 930. Jackson, John H. (1998). Global Economics and International Economic Law, Journal of International Economic Law, 1(1), 15-8. Jackson, R.H. (1990). Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World 15–6. Jau-Yuan Huang, Fort Fu-Te Liao, and Wen-Chen Chang (2003). Development of Constitution Law and Human Rights in Taiwan Facing the New Century. https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Reports/Als/pdf/24.pdf Jennings, Robert (2002). Sovereignty and International Law, in Gerard Kreijen et al (eds.), State, Sovereignty, and International Governance, 27, 29. Joseph, P.A. (1993). Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand 398 (1st, ed.) -(2001). Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand 105 (2nd ed.). Juan Francisco, Escudero Espinosa (2017). Self-Determination and Humanitarian Secession in International Law of a Globalized World: Kosovo v. Crimea 14. Ka, Chih-ming (1995). Japanese colonialism in Taiwan: land tenure, development, and dependency, 1895-1945 61. Kalyvas, Andreas (2005). Popular sovereignty, democracy, and the constituent power, Constellations, 12(2), 223, 237. K. C. Wu, Your Money Has Built a Police State in Formosa, Look, 18, 39-45. Kelsen, H. (1941), Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations, American Journal of International Law, 35, 605. -(1944). The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as a Basis for International Organization, Yale Law Journal, 53, 207-20. Kennedy, W.P.M. (1932). Some Aspects of the Theories and Workings of Constitutional Law 59. Kerr, George H. (1965). Formosa Betrayed. -(1974). Formosa: Licensed Revolution and the Home Rule Movement, 1895-1945, 119-125. Kim, S.S. (1978), People’s Republic of China and the Charter-based international legal order, American Journal of International Law, 72 , 317, 347. Klintworth, Gary (1995). New Taiwan, New China: Taiwan’s Changing Role in the Asia-Pacific Region 81-91. Kobayashi, Y. (2013), “Creative Compliance?” China’s Compliance with the WTO - a Case Study of Telecommunications Services, In K. Zeng and L. Wei (eds.), China and Global Trade Governance. Kohen, Marcelo G. (2006). Introduction, in Marcelo G. Kohen (eds.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 1, 10. Kohn, Hans (1957). American Nationalism. Koskenniemi, M. (1996).The Present State of Research Carried Out by the English-speaking Section of the Centre for Studies and Research of the Hague Academy of International Law, in Kaskenniemi (ed.), La succession d’états: la codofication à l’Épreuve des faits, 89,101 Koskenmäki, R. (2004). Legal Implications Resulting from State Failure in Light of the Case of Somalia, Nordic Journal of International Law, 73, 1, 16. Krieger, Heike & Rauschning, Dietrich (1997). East Timor and the International Community 44–52 Kristol, Willian (2004). The Taiwan Relations Act: the next 25 years, in John Tkacik (ed.), Rethinking “One China”, 15-6. Krasner, Stephen D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy 3. Kunz, Josef L. (1950). Critical Remarks on Lauterpacht’s “Recognition in International Law”, American Journal of International Law, 44, 713-9. Kuo, Su-Chiu (2019). From the Rover Incident to the Nanjia Treaty―Whose Conflict? Whose Treaty? Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies, 7(12). Lai, Tse-han Ramon Myers and Wei Wou (1991). A Tragic Beginning: The Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947. Lamley, Harry J. (1970). Assimilation efforts in colonial Taiwan: the fate of the 1914 movement, Monumenta Serica ,29, 496-503. -(1999). Taiwan under Japanese rule, 1895-1945: the vicissitudes of colonism, in Murray A. Rubinstein (eds.), Taiwan: a new history, 241-2. Lauterpacht, H. (1944). Recognition of States in International Law, Yale Law Journal, 53, 385- 90. - (1947). Recognition in International Law 98. Lauwers, G. & Smis, S. (2000). New Dimensions of the Right to Self-determination: A Study of the International Response to the Kosovo Crisis, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 6(2), 43, 57. Lee, Daniel (2016). Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Lee, James Chun-I et al (2002). Population study of polymorphic microsatellite DNA in Taiwan, Forensic Science Journal, 1(1), 31. Lee, Jongsoo James (2006). The Partition of Korea after World War II: A Global History 5-7. Leffler, Melvyn P. (1996). The Struggle for Germany and the Origins of the Cold War. https://www.ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/publications/Occasional_Papers/The_Struggle_for_Germany.pdf Lerhe, Eric (2018). Rethinking the Taiwan Question: How Canada Can Update Its Rigid "One-China" Policy for the 21st Century. Lerner, Hanna (2011). Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. Li, C. (2016). Chinese Politics, Economy, and Rule of Law, Brookings, at https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/chinese-politics-economy-and-rule-of-law/. Lin, Catherine Kai-Ping (2008). Nationalism in international politics: the Republic of China’s sports foreign policy-making and diplomacy from1972 to1981, Dissertation of Georgetown University https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/ORIG/2/HTqLK?_s=CZl6hfCy75PlZcNmZVr6%2FS5P%2BLc%3D Lindell, G. (1986). Why is Australia’s Constitution Binding?—the reasons in 1900 and Now and the Effect of Independence, Federal Law Review, 16, 29- 39. -(2003). Further reflections on the date of the acquisition of Australia’s independence, in G. Lindell, C. Saunders & R. French (eds.), Reflections on the Australian Constitution, 51-5. Lindley, M.F. (1926). Acquisition and Government of Backward Territory in International Law 22–3. Lo, Sonny Shiu-Hing et al (2019). China’s New United Front Work in Hong Kong: Penetrative Politics and Its Implications (1st ed.). Loughlin, M. (1992). Public Law and Political Theory 148 - (2003). The Idea of Public Law 67. Longrigg, S.H. (1958). Syria and Lebanon under French Mandate 362. Lumb, R.D. (1978). Fundamental Law and the Processes of Constitutional Change in Australia, Fedral Law Review, 9, 148-57. Lutz, Donald S. (1980). Popular Consent and Popular Control: Whig Political Theory in the Early State Constitutions 38. MacCormick, N. (1999). Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Practical Reason, 85. Ma, Herbert H. (1981). Adoption of the ROC Constitution of 1946, in James C. Hsiung et. al. (eds.), The Taiwan Experience, 1950-1980: Contemporary Republic of China, 298-301 Mahmoud, Manar (2020). Constitution-Making, Political Transition and Reconciliation in Tunisia and Egypt: A Comparative Perspective, in Richard Albert & Yaniv Roznai(eds), Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions Law, Emergency, Exception: Law, Emergency, Exception, 379-83. Malagodi, Mara, McDonagh, Luke, and Poole, Thomas (2019). The Dominion model of transitional constitutionalism, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17, 1283-8. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam and Stokes, Susan C. (1999). Introduction, In Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes and Bernard Manin (eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation 13. Manthorpe, Jonathan (2002). Forbidden Nation: A history of Taiwan 255. Marek, Krystyna (1954). Identity and continuity of states in public international law 4-5, 15-24,149-155 (1st ed.). Marek, Krystyna (1968). Identity and continuity of States in Public International Law 4 (2nd ed.). Marshall, G. (1984). Constitutional Conventions 188. Marston, Geoffrey (1991). United Kingdom Materials on International Law, British Yearbook of International Law 6, 535, 559. Martin, Fulda Andreas (2002). Reevaluating the Taiwanese democracy movement: A comparative analysis of opposition organizations under Japanese and KMT rule, Critical Asian Studies, 34(3), 357- 66. Martin, Harris Inwood (1949).The Japanese Demand for Formosa in the Treaty of Shimonoseki, 1895 23. McBeath, Jerry (2004). Democratization and Taiwan’s Constitutional Court, American Journal of Chinese Study, 11, 51. McHugh, P.G. (1991). The Maori Magna Carta: New Zealand Law and the Treaty of Waitangi 59. Mc Gechan, R. O. (1944). Status and Legislative Inability in J. C. Beaglehole (eds.), New Zealand and the Statute of Westminster, 65, 98. Mcintyre, David (2001). A Guide to the Contemporary Commonwealth 69-77. McNair, Lord (1961). The Law of Treaties 206-11. Mendel, Douglas (1970). The Politics of Formosan Nationalism 120. Mendel, F. Fraser (1993). Judicial Power and Illusion: The Republic of China’s Council of Grand Justices and Constitutional Interpretation, Pacific Rim law & Policy Journal, 2,172. Menon, P. (1994). The Law of Recognition in International Law 18. Mitchell, Timothy (1988). Colonizing Egypt 35. Morgan, Edmund S. (1977). “The Problem of Popular Sovereignty”, Aspects of American Liberty: Philosophical, Historical and Political 101. Morgenstern, Felice (1986). Legal Problems of International organizations 50. Morris, Andrew D. (2004). Taiwan’s history: an introduction, in David K Jordan, Andrew D Morris and Marc L Moskowitz (eds.), the Minor Arts of Daily life : Popular Culture in Taiwan,1-29. Muller, W. (2013).China’s sovereignty in international law: from historical grievance to pragmatic Tool, China-EU Law Journal, 1(3-4), 35–59. Murphy, Philip (2013). Monarchy and the End of Empire: The House of Windsor, the British Government, and the Postwar Commonwealth 17. Murray, G. (1922). Self-Determination of Nationalities, Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs, 1, 6. Myers, Ramon H. (1996). A New Chinese Civilization: The Evolution of the Republic of China on Taiwan, The China Quarterly, 148, 1072, 1078-9. Nolte, Georg (2006). Secession and external intervention, in Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, 65, 79. Northey, J.F. (1965).The New Zealand Constitution, in J.F. Northey (eds.), The A.G. Davis Essays in Law, 179 Rigger, Shelley (1999).Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. Robinson, Michael E. (2007). Korea's Twentieth-Century Odyssey: A Short History, 108–9. Roy, Denny (2003). Taiwan: A Political History 42. Schilcher, Manuel (2017). Dress up the Nation: Taiwan under Japanese Rule, https://www.academia.edu/33693607/Dress_up_the_Nation_Taiwan_under_Japanese_Rule Schubert, Gunter (2001), the European Dimension of German-Taiwanese Relations, conference paper, The Role of France and Germany in Sino-European Relations, Hong Kong, Jun. 22-23, https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/sites/sciencespo.fr.ceri/files/schubert.pdf. Scruton, Roger (1990). The Philosopher on Dover Beach 301. Schwartz, B. & Whyte, J.D. (1982–3). The Patriation Reference and the Idea of Canada, Queen’s Law Journal, 8, 158, 166. Shapiro, Scott J. (2009). What is the Rule of Recognition (and Does it Exist)? In Matthew Adler, Kenneth Himma (eds.),The Rule of Recognition and the US Constitution, Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 184, at 10-11, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1304645 Shaw, M. N (1996). The Heritage of States: The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today, British Yearbook of International Law, 67, 95-153. https://academic.oup.com/bybil/article/67/1/75/281947 -(1997). Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries, European Journal of International Law, 8, 478-500. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/8/3/1457.pdf - (2008). International Law 460-2. (6th ed.) Shen, J. (2000). Sovereignty, Statehood, Self-Determination and the Issue of Taiwan, American University International Law Review, 15(5), 1101. Slattery, Brian (1983). The Independence of Canada, Supreme Court Law Review, 5, 391. Slyke, Van & Lyman, P (1967). The China White Paper: August 1949, 308-9. Snyder, Glenn H. (1997). Alliance Politics 12. So, Kwan-wai (1975). Japanese Piracy in Ming China during the 16th Century. Storey, Ian (2012). China's Bilateral and Multilateral Diplomacy in the South China Sea, Asia Security, 8(3), 287. O’Connell, D. P. (1956). The Law of State Succession, 8. -(1956). The Status of Formosa and the Chinese Recognition Problem, American Journal of International Law, 50, 405-15. -(1960). International Law and Boundary Disputes, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921-1969), 54, 77-81. -(1967). State Succession in Municipal and International Law, 17. O’Donnell, G.A. (1994). Delegative Democracy, 5 Journal of Democracy 55-69. Oeter, S. (2012). Secession, Territorial Integrity and the Role of the Security Council. In P. Hilpold (eds.), Kosovo and International Law: The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010, 109-15. Ogden, S. P. (1975), Chinese Concepts of the Nation, State, and Sovereignty, PhD dissertation, Brown University. Oh, Seung-Youn (2015). Convenient Compliance. China's Industrial Policy Staying One Step Ahead of WTO Enforcement. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/191745/13.05.2015.pdf Ojielo, O. (2013). Justice versus reconciliation: the dilemmas of transitional justice in Kenya, in K. Omeje K &T. Redeker Hepner (eds.),Conflict and peacebuilding in the African great lakes region, 111. O’Keefe, Roger (2001). The Admission to the United Nations of the Ex-Soviet and Ex-Yugoslav States, Baltic Yearbook of International Law, 1, 167–89. Oliver, Peter C. (2003). Sovereignty in the Twenty-First Century, King's Law Journal, 14, 137. -(2005). The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. -(2010), “Dominion status”: History, framework and context, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), 1173-88. Olsen, Edward A. (2005). Korea, the Divided Nation 62. Österud, O. (1997). The Narrow Gate: Entry to the Club of Sovereign States, Review of International Studies, 23, 167- 75. Patberg, M. (2016). Constituent power: a discourse-theoretical solution to the conflict between openness and containment. Pazartzis, Photini (2006). Secession and international law: the European Dimension in Marcelo G. Kohen (eds.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, 355, 372. Pegg, S. (1998). International Society and the De Facto State 26. Pekinensia, Acta (2013). Western Historical Sources for the Kangxi Reign 294. Pemberton, Jo-Anne (2009). Sovereignty: interpretations 18-20, 98-105. Pembroke, Michael (2018). Korea: Where the American Century Began 47. Peng, Mingmin (1972). A Taste of Freedom: Memoirs of a Formosan Independence Leader 49. Peters, A. (2011). Does Kosovo Lie in the Lotus-Land of Freedom? Leiden Journal of International Law, 24, 95, 99-106. Peterson, M. J. (1997), Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice, 1815-1995, 36-42, 123. Phillips, Steven (1999). Between assimilation and independence: Taiwanese political aspirations under Nationalist Chinese rule 1945-1948, In Murray A. Rubinstein (eds.), Taiwan: A new History, 275, 282. Philpott, D. (2003). Sovereignty, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sovereignty/#DefiSove Pi, Hsiao-hua (1996). Taiwan minjian jiaoyu gaige yundong: guojia yu shehui de fenxi (Taiwan’s Civil Movement for Education Reform: Analysis of State and Society), 128-98. Post, Gaines (1946). A Romano-Canonical Maxim, “quod omnes tangit”, in Bracton, Traditio, 4, 197–251. Peattie, Mark R. (1984), Japanese Attitudes toward Colonialism, 1895-1945, in Ramon H. Myers and Mark R. Peattie( eds.), The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945 102, 109-114 Post, Gaines (1946), A Romano-Canonical Maxim, “quod omnes tangit,” in Bracton, 4 Traditio 197–251. Quick, R. & Garran, R. (reprint of 1901 edition, 1976). The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth 144. Raic, David (2002). Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination151–8, 171,262, 418–26(1st ed.) Raz, Joseph (1980). The Concept of a Legal System 88 (2nd ed.). -(1992). Practical Reasons and Norms 49-58 (2nd ed.). Requejo, Ferran & Sanjaume, Marc (2015). Recognition and Political Accommodation: from Regionalism to Secessionism-The Catalan Case, in Grégoire, J.-F. and Jewkes, M. (eds.), Recognition and Redistribution in Multinational Federations, 107,132 Reid, Anthony (1988). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450-1680, chap3. -(1990). An “Age of Commerce” in Southeast Asian History, Modern Asian Studies, 24(1), 1-30. Renaud, Anne-Gaëlle (2008). Comparative study of Japanese colonialism in Taiwan and Hokkaido. https://www.soas.ac.uk/taiwanstudies/eats/eats2008/file43183.pdf Rosas, A. (1993). Internal Self-Determination, in C. Tomuschat (eds.), Modern Law of Self-Determination, 225. Roth, B. (2000). Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law 124. Rühlig, Tim (2018). How China approaches international law: Implications for Europe, EU-Asia at a Glance https://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/EU_Asia_at_a_Glance_Ruhlig_2018_China_International_Law.pdf Ryngaert C., & Griffioen, C. (2009). The Relevance of the Right to Self-Determination in the Kosovo Matter: In Partial Response to the Agora Papers, Chicago journal of International Law, 8, 573-5. Russell, Ruth B. & Muther, Jeannette E. (1958), A History of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States, 1940-1945 813-24. Said, Edward W. (1994). Culture and Imperialism 9. Samuels, Kirsti (2006). Post-Conflict Peace-Building and Constitution-Making, Chicago Journal of International Law, 6 (2), 663–8. Schafferer, Christian (2003). The Power of the Ballot Box: Political Development and Election Campaigning in Taiwan 5. Setzekorn, Eric (2014). Military reform in Taiwan: the Lafayette scandal, National Defense Law and All-Volunteer Force, American Journal of Chinese Studies, 21(1), 7-19. Shepherd, John Robert (1993), Statecraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier 1600–1800 47-91. Skoggard, Ian A. (1996). The Indigenous Dynamic in Taiwan's Postwar Development: The Religious and Historical Roots of Entrepreneurship 10. Smyser, W. R. (2000). From Yalta to Berlin: From Yalta to Berlin: The Cold War Struggle Over Germany 295-396. Speidel, William Miller (1967). Liu Min Chu’an in Taiwan, 1884–1891, PhD dissertation, Yale University, 281. Stainton, Michael (2007). The Politics of Taiwan Aboriginal Origins, in Murray A. Rubinstein (eds.), Taiwan: a new history 27, 29-41. Ster Radan, P. (2001), Secession and Constitutional Law in the Former Yugoslavia, University of Tasmania Law Review, 20, 201. Sterio, Milena (2013). The Right to Self-determination under International Law 11. Stueck, William W. (2002). Rethinking the Korean War: A New Diplomatic and Strategic History 55–7. Sureda, A.R. (1973). The Evolution of the Right of Self-determination 353. Takekoshi, Yosaburō (2010). Japanese Rule in Formosa 68 (George Braithwaite trans.). https://archive.org/details/japaneseruleinf00takegoog/page/n50/mode/2up?view=theater Tai, Pao-tsun (2007). The Concise History of Taiwan 52. Talmon, Stefan (1992). Recognition of Governments: An Analysis of the New British Policy and Practice, British Year Book of International Law, 63, 163, 253. -(1998). Recognition of Governments in International Law; with Particular Reference to Governments in Exile, 88, 105. -(2011), Recognition of the Libyan National Transitional Council, American Society of International Law, 15(16). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1868032. Tancredi, Antonello (2006). A normative “due process” in the creation of States through secession, in Secession: International Law Perspectives 171,194, 206 (Marcelo G. Kohen ed.). -(2012). Some Remarks on the Relationship between Secession and General International Law in the Light of the ICJs Kosovo Advisory Opinion. In P. Hilpold (ed.), Kosovo and International Law: The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 79, 91. Takayanagi, Kenzo (1963). A Century of Innovation: The Development of Japanese Law, 1868-1961, in Arthur von Mehren (eds.), Law in Japan: the legal order in a changing society, 6-13. Tavares, A. (2004). Crystals from the savage forest: Imperialism and Capitalism in the Taiwan camphor industry, 1800–1945, Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University. Taylor, Jay (2000). The Generalissimo’s son: Chiang Ching-kuo and revolutions in China and Taiwan 357-86. Teubner, G. (1993). Law as an Autopoietic System 19-24. Thio, li-annm (2006). International law and secession in the Asia and Pacific regions, in (Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 297,300. Thompson, Laurence G. (1963). The Earliest Chinese Accounts of the Formosan Aborigines, Monumenta Serica, 23, 163-204. Thürer, Daniel (1999). The “Failed State” and International Law, International Review of the Red Cross, https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/article/other/57jq6u.htm Tkacik,Jr. John J.(2004). Introduction: Rethinking “One China”, in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China”, 5-6. - (2004). Humoring Chinese Irridentism: Invitation to disaster? in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China” 37, 47. - (2004). Understanding and Misunderstanding China Policy: A Primer, in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China” , 182,191-2. Tomuschat, Christian (2006). Secession and self-determination, in Marcelo G. Kohen (eds.), Secession: International Law Perspectives 23, 42. Tsang, Steve & Tien, Hung-mao (1999). Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China 123. Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf (1994). Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States 1945-1992 28. Urrutia, Iñigo (2012). Territorial Integrity and Self-Determination: The Approach of the International Court of Justice in the Advisory Opinion on Kosovo, Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, 16. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2365511 Van den Driest, S.F. (2015). Crimea’s Separation from Ukraine: An Analysis of the Right to Self-Determination and (Remedial) Secession in International Law, Netherland International Law Review, 62, 329, 353. Van Essen, Jonte (2012). De Facto Regimes in International Law. Merkourios, 28(74), 31-49. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2017736 Van Veen, Ernst (1996). How the Dutch ran a seventeenth-century colony: the occupation and loss of Formosa, 1624-1662, Itinerario, 20, 59, 65-67. Vecchione, Judith (1998). Tug of war: The story of Taiwan. Vermeule, A. (2001). Veil of ignorance rules in constitutional law, Yale Law Journal, 111, 399–433. Vidmar, J. (2011). The Kosovo Advisory Opinion Scrutinized, Leiden International Law Journal, 24, 355, 364. Wade, H.W.R. (1955). The Basis of Legal Sovereignty, Cambridge Law Journal, 13, 172-91. Wade, H.W.R. (1996). Sovereignty—Revolution or Evolution? Law Quarterly Review, 112, 568-74. Wade, Robert (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization 82-4. Walker, Richard L. (1959). Taiwan’s Development as Free China, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 321(1), 122, 130. Wallace, Rebecca M. M. (1986). International Law: A Student Introduction 240. Wang, Ching-Feng & Chian, Mei-fen (1997). The Japanese government’s legal liability to Comfort Women: A note for Taiwanese Comfort Women’s request of restitution to Japan, https://taiwan.yam.org.tw/womenweb/conf_women/conf_japan2e.htm Waltermann, Antonia M. (2019). Reconstructing sovereignty, 27-8, 60-87,157. Waldron, Arthur (2004). American diplomacy, and the origins of cross-strait tensions, in John Tkacik (eds.), Rethinking “One China”, 23. Waldron, J. (1998). Precommitment and disagreement, In L. Alexander (eds.).Constitutionalism: Philosophical foundations, 271–99. Wang, I-Shou (1980). Cultural Contact and the Migration of Taiwan’s Aborigines: A Historical Perspective, in Ronald G. Knapp (eds.), China’s Island Frontier: Studies in the Historical Geography of Taiwan, 31, 35-6. Wang, Peter Chen-main (1999). A bastion created, a regime reformed, an economy reengineered, 1949-1970, in Murray A. Rubinstein (eds.), Taiwan: A New History, 320, 324. Wang, Tay-sheng (2000). Legal Reform in Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule (1895 – 1945): The Reception of Western Law. -(2002). The Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20th Century: Toward a Liberal and Democratic Country, Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 11, 531-40. -(2013). The Modernization of Civil Justice in Colonial Taiwan, 1895–1945, Journal of Japanese Law, 36, 95-6 -(2016). Translation, Codification, and Translation, Codification, and Transplantation of Foreign Laws in Taiwan, Washington International Law Journal, 25, 307, 315. Warbrick, Colin (1992). Recognition of states, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 41, 473-7. Webster, T. (2014). Paper Compliance: How China Implements WTO Decisions, Michigan Journal of International Law, 35 (3), 525. Weingast, Barry (1997). The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law, American Political Science Review, 91, 245-9. Weingast, B.R. (2006). Designing constitutional stability, In R.D. Congleton and B Swedenborg (eds.), Democratic constitutional design and public policy. Analysis and evidence, 343-66. Wesley-Smith (1987), Settlement of the Question of Hong Kong, California Western International Law Journal, 17(1), 116,117. Weng, Yueh-sheng (2014). Interpretations of the Constitutional Court and the Developments of Rule of Law and Democratic Constitutionalism in Taiwan, in Kittisak Prokati, Henning Glaser and Kittisak Prokati (eds.), Constitutionalism and Good Governance, 321 – 60. Whelan, Anthony (1994). Wilsonian Self-Determnination and the Versailles Settlement, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43, 99. Wills Jr., John E. Pepper (1974). Guns, and Parleys: The Dutch East India Company and China, 1662–1681 29-100. Wills, Jr., John E. (1979). Maritime China from Wang Chih to Shih Lang: Themes in Peripheral History, in Jonathan D. Spence & John Elliot Wills(eds.), From Ming to Ch’ing: Conquest, Region, and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century China, 229–30. Wills, Jr., John E. (1984). Embassies and Illusions: Dutch and Portuguese Envoys to K’ang-hsi, 1666-1687 148-51. Wills, Jr., John E. (1999). The Seventeenth-Century Transformations: Taiwan Under the Dutch and the Cheng regime, in Murray A. Rubinstein (eds.), Taiwan: A new history. Winterton, G. (1998).Popular sovereignty and constitutional continuity, Federal Law Review, 26, 1–14 Winterton, G. (2003). The Acquisition of Independence, in G.J. Lindell, C. Saunders and R.S. French (eds.), Reflections on the Australian Constitution, 31. Wong, Young-tsu (1981). Security and Warfare on the China Coast, Monumenta Serica, 35, 111, 149–153 Wright, Quincy (1955). The Chinese Recognition Problem, American Journal of International Law, 49 (3), 332 Wright, Q. (1962), The Goa Incident, American Journal of International Law, 56, 617. Wu, Der-yuan (2001). Institutional Development and Adaptability: Canada, Taiwan and the Social construction of “One China”, PhD Dissertation, University of Carleton, https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/e4ac546a-7d13-4852-be2b-3e7db839f89c/etd_pdf/76b564d7c2ffffd7b6462ce7324629cd/wu-institutionaldevelopmentandadaptabilitycanada.pdf Wu, G. (2007). Identity, sovereignty, and economic penetration: Beijing’s responses to off shore Chinese democracies, Journal of Contemporary China, 16 (51), 195, 298. Wu, Wenxing (1987). Riju shiqi Taiwan zongdufu tuiguang Riyu yundong chutan (An investigation into the Taiwan colonial administration’s Japanese language promotion campaigns during the Japanese occupation), Taiwan fenwu (Taiwan folkways), 37(14), 69. Wu, Xiaohui (2002), Human Rights: China’s Historical Perspectives in Context, Journal of the History of International Law, 4, 335–73. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1716779 Wynes, W. Anstey (1936). Legislative and Executive Powers in Australia 74 (1st ed.). Yack, Bernard (2001), Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism, Political Theory, 29, 517-20. Yack, Bernard (2003). Nationalism, popular sovereignty and the liberal democratic state, in S T. V. Paul, G. John Ikenberry and John A. Hall (eds.), The Nation-State in Question, 37. Yang, Martin M.C. (1970). Socio-Economic Results of Land Reform in Taiwan 82. Yoshida, Katutugu (2009). Taiwan’s Long Road to Democracy: Bitter Taste of Freedom (Toshie Hwabu &Peter Hayes ed. and trans.) Ye, Ruiping (2019). The Colonisation and Settlement of Taiwan, 1684–1945: Land Tenure, Law and Qing and Japanese Policies. Yeh, Jiunn-rong (1997). The Cult of Fatung, Representative Manipulation and Reconstruction in Taiwan in Graham Hassall & Cheryl Saunders (eds.), The People Representatives: Electoral Systems in the Asia-Pacific Region, 23-37. - (2002), Constitutional Reform and Democratization in Taiwan, 1945 – 2000, in PCY Chow (eds.), Taiwan’s Modernization in Global Perspective, 35-6. - (2016), The Constitution of Taiwan: A Contextual Analysis. Yeh, J-r& Chang, W-C (2009). The Changing Landscape of Modern Constitutionalism: Transitional Perspective, National Taiwan University Law Review 4, 145, 156 – 57. -(2014). A Decade of Changing Constitutionalism in Taiwan: Transitional and Transnational Perspectives in AHY Chen (eds.), Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-first Century, 141,150 – 2. Zelikow, Philip D. & Rice, Condoleezza (1997). Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft 63–101. Zines, L. (1997). The Sovereignty of the People” in M. Cooper & G. Williams (eds.), Power, Parliament and the people. Østrup, Anne (2016). Conceptions of State Identity and Continuity in Contemporary International Legal Scholarship, European Society of International Law (ESIL) 2015 Research Forum (Florence), University of Copenhagen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016-15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2715701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2715701 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86106 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 1949年以來,台灣不是被界定為中國的一個省,就是被拿來和中華民國混爲一談。「台灣」, 這個國際社會對這個島嶼公認的稱呼,至今無法作爲台灣的官方名稱出現在國内外各種場合。1950-60年代,全世界殖民地自決權運動風起雲湧之際,流亡到台灣的蔣氏政權宣稱中華民國流亡政府仍是全中國的合法政府,這個宣稱受到了冷戰時期大國對聯合國政治操控的助紂爲虐,而被犧牲掉的是台灣人的自決權和主體意識。在1990年代的台灣民主化運動中,台灣人仍然無法擺脫統獨問題的桎梏,學界和政界在内國法層面確立了「中華民國在台灣」的理論基礎,導致「中華民國」在國際法上不被承認,卻在内國法上繼續存在的荒謬現象。台灣民主改革之後的30多年裏,在國内政治上,圍繞統獨問題不斷内耗,導致發展的停滯;在對外關係上,因爲受制於「一個中國」原則而寸步難行。事實證明,「中華民國在台灣」的理論無法經受起時間和實踐的檢驗。
「中華民國在台灣」之所以無法被國際社會所接受,究其原因,是因爲學術界一直把國際法和内國憲法分開討論和研究,而沒有意識到這兩者之間的連動關係。本文回顧台灣歷史,探究導致台灣今天法律地位困境的歷史原因,將國際法的國家理論和實踐涵攝到中華民國和台灣的國家地位認定。本文首先論證中華民國和台灣在國際法上是兩個不同的主體,進一步將國際上自決權運動和台灣民主轉型與憲法的發展演變相結合,以實質憲法理論的主權在民内涵,説明台灣在憲政改革過程中如何有效的行使了自決權。本文主張,在中華民國憲法框架下的内國憲法詮釋上,必須將國際法上的自決權和内國法上的人民主權相結合,才能合理的解釋台灣的法律地位。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since 1949, Taiwan was either be designated as a province of China or be confused with the Republic of China, and its current constitution name “Republic of China” (ROC) Constitution, has led to confusion about Taiwan’s legal status and its relations with China. The confusing identity of Taiwan is due to complex historical factors, international power plays and political calculus. For a long time, the legal status of Taiwan has been considered as a legal limbo, due to the traditional, separatist understanding of international laws and constitutions. Under that understanding, a declaration of invalidity in international law does not necessarily bear legal consequences in the domestic national system. On the other hand, legal status of a territorial unit is not solely determined by the municipal law of that state.
This thesis argues that the legal status of Taiwan cannot be well explained by closely looking into the interfaces between international law and constitution. As a matter of fact, international laws and constitutions have much more complex interfaces than one would have expected. An independent sovereign state cannot obtain its full sovereignty until its constitutional independence is attained. The concept of self-determination in international law is also closely associated with the concept of popular sovereignty in constitutional law; the central tenet of both is that the legitimacy of law is based on the consent of the governed. Centering on the concept of human subjectivity, this Thesis looks back into the history of Taiwan and the historical background that put Taiwan at today’s dilemma, providing a critical reappraisal of each relevant party’s positions, and exploring the legal status of Taiwan from an interactive perspective of international law and constitution. By examining the interfaces of international laws and constitutions, this Paper has found that the legal status of Taiwan as an independent sovereign state has already been attained in the eyes of both international law and constitutional law, and suggests that the confusing identity of Taiwan should be rectified to consolidate this status. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:37:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0909202215474300.pdf: 5096607 bytes, checksum: 4806fd0971a13c995eb6fefc3c0558dd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Master Thesis Acceptance Certificate……………………………………………...ii
Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………….iii Abstract & Keywords (English)………………………………………………….... iv Abstract & Keywords (Chinese)…………………………………………………...vi List of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………viii Chapter I: Introduction 1 Chapter II: Important Concepts about Statehood 5 1. Sovereignty 5 1.1 Territorial Sovereignty 8 1.2 Independence 10 1.3 Popular Sovereignty 12 1.4 Sovereignty Equality 15 2. Statehood 17 2.1 Recognition 21 2.2 Self-determination 24 2.3 Secession 31 3. State Continuity/identity 45 3.1 Failed State 45 3.2 Theories and International Practice of State Continuity/Identity 48 4. Territorial Disposition 56 4.1 Peace Treaty 56 4.2 Transitional Arrangements 59 4.21 Mandate and Trusteeship 59 4.22 Non-self-government Territories 63 4.3 Principal of Intertemporal Law 67 5. Divided Nation 72 5.1 Two Germanys 72 5.2 Two Koreas 79 5.3 Characteristics of the Divided Nations 86 6. Applying the Statehood Theories to Taiwan 88 Chapter III: Historical Analysis of Taiwan’s Statehood 90 1. Dutch (1624-1662) 93 2. Cheng regime (1662-1683) 106 3. Chinese Qing Dynasty (1683-1895) 120 4. Japan (1895-1945) 130 5. China (1945-1949) 146 6. ROC Government in Exile (1949-1991) 159 7. Self-government (1991-Present) 182 Chapter IV: Statehood Evolvement of Taiwan 185 1. Background Review 185 1.1 1941-1951 (World War II and Postwar Period) 185 1.2 1951-1979 (Cold War Period) 200 1.3 1979-Now (Post General De- recognition of ROC) 207 2. Relationship between ROC and Taiwan 217 2.1 Implications of the UN Resolution 2758 217 2.2 Entangled State Name Issue 233 2.3 Taiwan’s Legal Status as a Self-determination Unit 238 2.3.1 Limitations on the Right of Self-determination 246 2.3.2 Legitimacy of the “ROC on Taiwan” 248 2.3.3 National Unity V.S. Self-determination 255 2.3.4 Sub Conclusion 258 3. Sovereignty of Taiwan after 1949 259 3.1 Nature of the 1954 US-Sino Defense Treaty 264 3.2 Recognition under the “One China Policy” 267 3.2.1 Positions of the Western Powers 268 3.2.1.1 Sub Conclusion 277 3.3 State Practices after the De-recognition of ROC 277 3.4 Independence of Taiwan 282 4. Critical Reappraisals of the Positions of Relevant Parties 290 4.1 Positions of China 290 4.2 Positions of the ROC Government in Exile 306 4.3 Positions of the US 323 5. Statehood Attained and Obstacles to a Full-functioning state 335 5.1 Achieving Self-determination 335 5.2 Problematic International Identity of Taiwan 347 5.3 Critical appraisals of James Crawford’s viewpoints 355 Chapter V: Constitutional Independence 369 1. Constitutional Independence of the Dominions 370 1.1 Canada 383 1.2 Australia 393 1.3 New Zealand 402 1.4 Sub Conclusion 406 2. Constitutional Development of Taiwan 412 2.1 Under Japan (1895-1945) 416 2.1.1 Governmental System 416 2.1.2 Human Rights 418 2.1.3 Autonomy 421 2.2 Under China (1945-1949) 426 2.2.1 Governmental system 426 2.2.2 Human Rights 436 2.2.3 Autonomy 438 2.3 Under the ROC Government in Exile (1949-1987) 440 2.3.1 Governmental System 440 2.3.2 Human Rights 447 2.3.3 Autonomy 452 2.4 Indigenization of KMT 455 2.5 Disguised Revolution (1987-2005) 461 3. Precarious Sovereignty of Taiwan 473 4. Conclusion 481 Chapter VI: Prospectus of the Legal Status of Taiwan 488 1. Taiwan’s Relationship with China 488 1.1 China’s Attitude toward International law 488 1.2 Legitimacy of China’s Claim of “Reunification” with Taiwan 499 2. Fatal Defects of the Constitution of Taiwan 516 2.1 Unsustainable Democracy 516 2.2 Deadlock of the Constitution 518 2.3 Fundamental Incompatibility of the Two Constitutions 523 3. Taiwan’s Relationship with the Free World 528 3.1 Importance of a Democratic Taiwan in Asia 528 3.2 US Role in Shaping the Democracy of Taiwan 532 4. Consolidating the Sovereignty of Taiwan 560 Chapter VII: Conclusion 566 Bibliography 570 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 民主台灣的國家形成和鞏固:以國際法及憲法的連動發展為視角 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Formation and Consolidation of the Democratic State of Taiwan: Interrelations of International Law and Constitution | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉俊榮;姜皇池;黃居正 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jiunn-Rong Yeh;Huang-Chih Chiang;Chu-Cheng Huang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 台灣國際地位,自決權,一個中國,中華民國憲法,人民主權, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan,legal status of Taiwan,constitution of Taiwan,self-determination,one China policy,Taiwan China relations,US Taiwan relations, | en |
dc.relation.page | 611 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203264 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-12 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 科際整合法律學研究所 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-14 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 科際整合法律學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-110-2.pdf | 2.92 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。