請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8609
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Nien-Chen Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭年真 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T19:58:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-13 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T19:58:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-09-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1 .Aguado, A., Guino, E., Mukherjee, B., Sicras, A., Serrat, J., Acedo, M., et al. (2008). Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: A cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care. [Article]. Bmc Health Services Research, 8.
2 .Allgood, P. C., & Bachmann, M. O. (2006). Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. [Article]. British Journal of Cancer, 94(1), 36-42. 3 .Asch, Steven M., Rand Corporation., & United States. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2000). Quality of care for oncologic conditions and HIV : a review of the literature and quality indicators. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Health. 4 .Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F., & Strauss, R. P. (1986). A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods - an Illustrative Study of Hospital Production. Management Science, 32(1), 30-44. 5 .Banker, R. D., & Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 56(1), 48-58. 6 .Begg, C. B., Cramer, L. D., Hoskins, W. J., & Brennan, M. F. (1998). Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. [Article]. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(20), 1747-1751. 7 .Bergman, L., Dekker, G., Vankerkhoff, E. H. M., Peterse, H. L., Vandongen, J. A., & Vanleeuwen, F. E. (1991). Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Treatment Choice and Survival in Elderly Patients with Breast-Cancer. [Article]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 18(3), 189-198. 8 .Bickell, N. A., & Chassin, M. R. (2000). Determining the quality of breast cancer care: Do tumor registries measure up? [Article]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132(9), 705-+. 9 .Binder, Leah F., & Barbara Rudolph (2009). Commentary: A Systematic Review of Health Care Efficiency Measures. Health Services Research, 44(3), 806-811. 10 .Birkmeyer, J. D., Finlayson, E. V. A., & Birkmeyer, C. M. (2001). Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery, 130(3), 415-422. 11 .Boffetta, P., Merletti, F., Winkelmann, R., Magnani, C., Cappa, A. P. M., & Terracini, B. (1993). Survival of Breast-Cancer Patients from Piedmont, Italy. [Article]. Cancer Causes & Control, 4(3), 209-215. 12 .Bonett, A., Roder, D., & Esterman, A. (1991). Case-Survival Rates for Infiltrating Ductal Carcinomas by Category of Hospital at Diagnosis in South-Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 154(10), 695-697. 13 .Boudourakis, L. D., Wang, T. S., Roman, S. A., Desai, R., & Sosa, J. A. (2009). Evolution of the Surgeon-Volume, Patient-Outcome Relationship. [Article]. Annals of Surgery, 250(1), 159-165. 14 .Brown, H. S. (2003). Managed care and technical efficiency. Health Economics, 12(2), 149-158. 15 .Brown, M. L., Hankey, B. F., & Ballard-Barbash, R. (2000). Measuring the quality of breast cancer care. [Letter]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(11), 920-920. 16 .Brown, M. M., Brown, G. C., Sharma, S., & Landy, J. (2003). Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine. [Review]. Survey of Ophthalmology, 48(2), 204-223. 17 .Burgess, J. F., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Variation in inefficiency among US hospitals. Infor, 36(3), 84-102. 18 .Campbell, S. M., Roland, M. O., & Buetow, S. A. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 51(11), 1611-1625. 19 .Carey, K., & Burgess, J. F. (1999). On measuring the hospital cost/quality trade-off. Health Economics, 8(6), 509-520. 20 .Carlsson, L., Borjesson, U., & Edgren, L. (2002). Patient based 'burden-of-illness' in Swedish Primary Health Care. Applying the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-mix System in a retrospective study of electronic patient records. [Article]. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 17(3), 269-282. 21 .Cebul, R. D., Snow, R. J., Pine, R., Hertzer, N. R., & Norris, D. G. (1998). Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(16), 1282-1287. 22 .Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2007a). Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Plan Development: Issues Paper: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,. 23 .Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2007b). REPORT TO CONGRESS: Plan to Implement a Medicare Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program ( Report): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,. 24 .Chang, H. H., Cheng, M. A., & Das, S. (2004). Hospital ownership and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan. [Article]. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 513-527. 25 .Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(5), 373-383. 26 .Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. 27 .Chen, C. S., Liu, T. C., Lin, H. C., & Lien, Y. C. (2008). Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. [Article]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 110(2), 349-356. 28 .Cheng, S. H., Wang, C. J., Lin, J. L., Horng, C. F., Lu, M. C., Asch, S. M., et al. (2009). Adherence to Quality Indicators and Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer. Medical Care, 47(2), 217-225. 29 .Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007). A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. [Review]. British Journal of Surgery, 94(2), 145-161. 30 .Chung, K. P., Lai, M. S., Cheng, S. H., Tang, S. T., Huang, C. C., Cheng, A. L., et al. (2008). Organization-based performance measures of cancer care quality: core measure development for breast cancer in Taiwan. [Article]. European Journal of Cancer Care, 17(1), 5-18. 31 .Clement, Jan, Valdmanis, Vivian, Bazzoli, Gloria, Zhao, Mei, & Chukmaitov, Askar (2008). Is more better? An analysis of hospital outcomes and efficiency with a DEA model of output congestion. Health Care Management Science, 11(1), 67-77. 32 .Cronin-Fenton, D. P., Norgaard, M., Jacobsen, J., Garne, J. P., Ewertz, M., Lash, T. L., et al. (2007). Comorbidity and survival of Danish breast cancer patients from 1995 to 2005. [Article]. British Journal of Cancer, 96(9), 1462-1468. 33 .Culver, C. M., & Gert, B. (1980). Regionalization of Surgical Services. New England Journal of Medicine, 302(18), 1034-1035. 34 .Deily, M. E., & McKay, N. L. (2006). Cost inefficiency and mortality rates in Florida hospitals. Health Economics, 15(4), 419-431. 35 .Deyo, R. A., Cherkin, D. C., & Ciol, M. A. (1992). Adapting a Clinical Comorbidity Index for Use with Icd-9-Cm Administrative Databases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45(6), 613-619. 36 .Diez-Roux, A. V. (1998). Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. [Article]. American Journal of Public Health, 88(2), 216-222. 37 .Diez-Roux, A. V. (2000). Multilevel analysis in public health research. [Review]. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 171-192. 38 .Donegan, W. L. (1997). Tumor-related prognostic factors for breast cancer. [Review]. Ca-a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 47(1), 28-51. 39 .Douek, M., & Taylor, I. (2003). Good practice and quality assurance in surgical oncology. [Review]. Lancet Oncology, 4(10), 626-630. 40 .du Bois, A., Rochon, J., Lamparter, C., & Pfisterer, J. (2005). Pattern of care and impact of participation in clinical studies on the outcome in ovarian cancer. [Review]. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 15(2), 183-191. 41 .Dudley, R. A., Johansen, K. L., Brand, R., Rennie, D. J., & Milstein, A. (2000). Selective referral to high-volume hospitals - Estimating potentially avoidable deaths. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(9), 1159-1166. 42 .Enthoven, A. C., & Tollen, L. A. (2005). Competition in health care: It takes systems to pursue quality and efficiency. [Article]. Health Affairs, 24(5), W5420-W5433. 43 .Farley, D. E., & Ozminkowski, R. J. (1992). Volume-Outcome Relationships and Inhospital Mortality - the Effect of Changes in Volume over Time. Medical Care, 30(1), 77-94. 44 .Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a-General, 120(3), 253-290. 45 .Fendrick, A. M., & Shapiro, N. L. (2008). A commentary on the potential of value-based insurance design (VBID) to contain costs and preserve quality. [Article]. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 14(6), S11-S15. 46 .Fleming, S. T., Rastogi, A., Dmitrienko, A., & Johnson, K. D. (1999). A comprehensive prognostic index to predict survival based on multiple comorbidities - A focus on breast cancer. [Article]. Medical Care, 37(6), 601-614. 47 .Fleming, Steven T. (1990). The Relationship between the Cost and Quality of Hospital Care: A Review of the Literature. Med Care Res Rev, 47(4), 487-502. 48 .Giuffrida, A., & Gravelle, H. (2001). Measuring performance in primary care: econometric analysis and DEA. Applied Economics, 33(2), 163-175. 49 .Goldstein, H. (1986). Multilevel Mixed Linear-Model Analysis Using Iterative Generalized Least-Squares. [Article]. Biometrika, 73(1), 43-56. 50 .Gordon, T. A., Burleyson, G. P., Tielsch, J. M., & Cameron, J. L. (1995). The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High-Risk Surgical-Procedure. [Article]. Annals of Surgery, 221(1), 43-49. 51 .Goy, J. C., Dobbs, H. J., Henderson, S., Humphreys, S., & Michell, M. J. (1998). Variations in referral pattern for postoperative radiotherapy of patients with screen-detected breast cancer in the south Thames (east) region. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 10(1), 24-29. 52 .Grilli, R., Mainini, F., Penna, A., Bertolini, G., Scorpiglione, N., Torri, V., et al. (1993). Inappropriate Halsted Mastectomy and Patient Volume in Italian Hospitals. [Article]. American Journal of Public Health, 83(12), 1762-1764. 53 .Grosskopf, S., & Valdmanis, V. (1987). Measuring Hospital Performance - a Nonparametric Approach. Journal of Health Economics, 6(2), 89-107. 54 .Grumbach, K., Anderson, G. M., Luft, H. S., Roos, L. L., & Brook, R. (1995). Regionalization of Cardiac-Surgery in the United-States and Canada - Geographic Access, Choice, and Outcomes. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(16), 1282-1288. 55 .Guller, U., Safford, S., Pietrobon, R., Heberer, M., Oertli, D., & Jain, N. B. (2005). High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: Analysis of 233,247 patients. [Article]. World Journal of Surgery, 29(8), 994-1000. 56 .Halling, A., Fridh, G., & Ovhed, I. (2006). Validating the Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system of the elderly in Swedish primary health care. [Article]. Bmc Public Health, 6. 57 .Halm, E. A., Lee, C., & Chassin, M. R. (2002). Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. [Review]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(6), 511-520. 58 .Hannan, E. L., Kilburn, H., Bernard, H., Odonnell, J. F., Lukacik, G., & Shields, E. P. (1991). Coronary-Artery Bypass-Surgery - the Relationship between Inhospital Mortality-Rate and Surgical Volume after Controlling for Clinical Risk-Factors. Medical Care, 29(11), 1094-1107. 59 .Hannan, E. L., Kilburn, H., Odonnell, J. F., Bernard, H. R., Shields, E. P., Lindsey, M. L., et al. (1992). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship between in-Hospital Mortality in New-York-State and the Volume of Abdominal Aortic-Aneurysm Surgeries Performed. Health Services Research, 27(4), 517-542. 60 .Hannan, E. L., Odonnell, J. F., Kilburn, H., Bernard, H. R., & Yazici, A. (1989). Investigation of the Relationship between Volume and Mortality for Surgical-Procedures Performed in New-York State Hospitals. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 262(4), 503-510. 61 .Hannan, E. L., Wu, C. T., DeLong, E. R., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Predicting risk-adjusted mortality for CABG surgery - Logistic versus hierarchical logistic models. [Article]. Medical Care, 43(7), 726-735. 62 .Harcourt, K. F., & Hicks, K. L. (2003). Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer? [Proceedings Paper]. American Journal of Surgery, 185(5), 407-410. 63 .Hassett, M. J., Hughes, M. E., Niland, J. C., Ottesen, R., Edge, S. B., Bookman, M. A., et al. (2008). Selecting high priority quality measures for breast cancer quality improvement. [Proceedings Paper]. Medical Care, 46(8), 762-770. 64 .Hebert-Croteau, N., Brisson, J., Lemaire, J., Latreille, J., & Pineault, R. (2005). Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. [Proceedings Paper]. Cancer, 104(7), 1343-1348. 65 .Hebert-Croteau, N., Roberge, D., & Brisson, J. (2007). Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment. [Review]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 105(2), 117-132. 66 .Henderson, I. C., & Patek, A. J. (1998). The relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer. [Review]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 52(1-3), 261-288. 67 .Henebiens, M., van den Broek, T. A. A., Vahl, A. C., & Koelemay, M. J. W. (2007). Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review. [Review]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 33(3), 285-292. 68 .Hewitt, Maria Elizabeth, Petitti, Diana B., National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.), & National Research Council (U.S.). Division on Earth and Life Studies. (2001). Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of cancer care. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 69 .Hewitt, Maria Elizabeth, Simone, Joseph V., & National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.) (1999). Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 70 .Hillner, B. E., Smith, T. J., & Desch, C. E. (2000). Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: Importance in quality of cancer care. [Review]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(11), 2327-2340. 71 .Hiotis, K., Ye, W., Sposto, R., & Skinner, K. A. (2005). Predictors of breast conservation therapy - Size is not all that matters. [Article]. Cancer, 103(5), 892-899. 72 .Hodgson, D. C., Fuchs, C. S., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2001). Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. [Review]. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93(7), 501-515. 73 .Hoff, A. (2007). Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 425-435. 74 .Hogan, A. M., & Winter, D. C. (2008). Does practice make perfect? [Article]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 15(5), 1267-1270. 75 .Hollingsworth, B. (2008). The Measurement of Efficiency and Productivity of Health Care Delivery. [Proceedings Paper]. Health Economics, 17(10), 1107-1128. 76 .Hollingsworth, Bruce, & Peacock, Stuart (2008). Efficiency measurement in health and healthcare. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge. 77 .Holt, P. J. E., Poloniecki, J. D., Loftus, I. M., & Thompson, M. M. (2007). Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. [Review]. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 33(6), 645-651. 78 .Houghton, A. (1994). Variation in Outcome of Surgical-Procedures. [Review]. British Journal of Surgery, 81(5), 653-660. 79 .Houterman, S., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G., Verheij, Cdgw, Louwman, W. J., Vreugdenhil, G., van der Sangen, M. J. C., et al. (2004). Comorbidity has negligible impact on treatment and complications but influences survival in breast cancer patients. [Article]. British Journal of Cancer, 90(12), 2332-2337. 80 .Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1994). Multilevel Analysis-Methods. [Article]. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 283-299. 81 .Hynes, D. M., Weaver, F., Morrow, M., Folk, F., Winchester, D. J., Mallard, M., et al. (2004). Breast cancer surgery trends and outcomes: Results from a National Department of Veterans Affairs study. [Article]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 198(5), 707-716. 82 .Ingram, D. M., McEvoy, S. P., Byrne, M. J., Fritschi, L., Joseph, D. J., & Jamrozik, K. (2005). Surgical caseload and outcomes for women with invasive breast cancer treated in Western Australia. [Article]. Breast, 14(1), 11-17. 83 .Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Performance Measures Payment and Performance Improvement Programs. (2007). Rewarding provider performance : aligning incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 84 .Isaacs, C., Stearns, V., & Hayes, D. F. (2001). New prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence. [Review]. Seminars in Oncology, 28(1), 53-67. 85 .Jacobs, Rowena, Smith, Peter, & Street, Andrew (2006). Measuring efficiency in health care : analytic techniques and health policy. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. 86 .Jha, Ashish K., Orav, E. John, Dobson, Allen, Book, Robert A., & Epstein, Arnold M. (2009). Measuring Efficiency: The Association Of Hospital Costs And Quality Of Care. Health Aff, 28(3), 897-906. 87 .Johns Hopkins University (2008). ACG- International Retrieved Aug. 18, 2008, from http://www.acg.jhsph.edu/html/International.htm 88 .Joseph, Bellal, Morton, John M., Hernandez-Boussard, Tina, Rubinfeld, Ilan, Faraj, Chadi, & Velanovich, Vic (2009). Relationship Between Hospital Volume, System Clinical Resources, and Mortality in Pancreatic Resection. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 208(4), 520-527. 89 .Kajander, J. (1997). Ensuring health care quality: A purchaser's perspective - An employer. [Proceedings Paper]. Clinical Therapeutics, 19(6), 1555-1563. 90 .Kautter, J., Pope, G. C., Trisolini, M., & Grund, S. (2007). Medicare Physician Group Practice demonstration design: Quality and efficiency pay-for-performance. [Article]. Health Care Financing Review, 29(1), 15-29. 91 .Kenagy, J. W., McCarthy, S. M., Young, D. W., Barrett, D., & Pinakiewicz, D. C. (2001). Toward a value-based health care system. [Article]. American Journal of Medicine, 110(2), 158-163. 92 .Kizer, K. W., & Pane, G. A. (1997). The 'new VA': Delivering health care value through integrated service networks. [Article]. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 30(6), 804-807. 93 .Klabunde, C. N., Harlan, L. C., & Warren, J. L. (2006). Data sources for measuring comorbidity - A comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients. [Article]. Medical Care, 44(10), 921-928. 94 .Klabunde, C. N., Legler, J. M., Warren, J. L., Laura-Mae, B., & Schrag, D. (2007). A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. [Article]. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(8), 584-590. 95 .Klabunde, C. N., Potosky, A. L., Legler, J. M., & Warren, J. L. (2000). Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(12), 1258-1267. 96 .Kraus, T. W., Buchler, M. W., & Herfarth, C. (2005). Relationships between volume, efficiency, and quality in surgery - A delicate balance from managerial perspectives. [Article]. World Journal of Surgery, 29(10), 1234-1240. 97 .Krumholz, H. M., Keenan, P. S., Brush, J. E., Bufalino, V. J., Chernew, M. E., Epstein, A. J., et al. (2008). Standards for Measures Used for Public Reporting of Efficiency in Health Care A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. [Article]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52(18), 1518-1526. 98 .Kuo, Raymond, & Lai, Mei-Shu (2010). Comparison of Rx-defined morbidity groups and diagnosis- based risk adjusters for predicting healthcare costs in Taiwan. Bmc Health Services Research, 10(1), 126. 99 .Laine, J., Linna, M., Hakkinen, U., & Noro, A. (2005). Measuring the productive efficiency and clinical quality of institutional long-term care for the elderly. [Article]. Health Economics, 14(3), 245-256. 100 .Lash, T. L., Thwin, S. S., Horton, N. J., Guadagnoli, E., & Silliman, R. A. (2003). Multiple informants: A new method to assess breast cancer patients' comorbidity. [Article]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(3), 249-257. 101 .Lee, W. C. (2008). Quantifying morbidities by Adjusted Clinical Group system for a Taiwan population: A nationwide analysis. [Article]. Bmc Health Services Research, 8. 102 .Lee, W. C., & Huang, T. P. (2008). Explanatory ability of the ACG system regarding the utilization and expenditure of the National Health Insurance population in Taiwan - A 5-year analysis. [Article]. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 71(4), 191-199. 103 .Leefeldstein, A., Antonculver, H., & Feldstein, P. J. (1994). Treatment Differences and Other Prognostic Factors Related to Breast-Cancer Survival - Delivery Systems and Medical Outcomes. [Article]. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(15), 1163-1168. 104 .Leyland, A. H., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2003). Multilevel modelling and public health policy. [Article]. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 31(4), 267-274. 105 .Linna, M. (1998). Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models. [Proceedings Paper]. Health Economics, 7(5), 415-427. 106 .Louwman, W. J., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G., Houterman, S., Voogd, A. C., van der Sangen, M. J. C., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., et al. (2005). Less extensive treatment and inferior prognosis for breast cancer patient with comorbidity: A population-based study. [Article]. European Journal of Cancer, 41(5), 779-785. 107 .Ludwig, M., Van Merode, F., & Groot, W. (2010). Principal agent relationships and the efficiency of hospitals. [Article]. European Journal of Health Economics, 11(3), 291-304. 108 .Luft, H. S. (1980). The Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality - an Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative Models. Medical Care, 18(9), 940-959. 109 .Luft, H. S., Bunker, J. P., & Enthoven, A. C. (1979). Should Operations Be Regionalized - Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality. New England Journal of Medicine, 301(25), 1364-1369. 110 .Luft, H. S., Hunt, S. S., & Maerki, S. C. (1987). The Volume-Outcome Relationship - Practice-Makes-Perfect or Selective-Referral Patterns. Health Services Research, 22(2), 157-182. 111 .Ma, M., Bell, J., Campbell, S., Basnett, I., Pollock, A., & Taylor, I. (1997). Breast cancer management: Is volume related to quality? [Article]. British Journal of Cancer, 75(11), 1652-1659. 112 .Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58(2), 127-137. 113 .Maas, Cora J. M., & Hox, Joop J. (2005). Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 85-91. 114 .Magnussen, J. (1996). Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production. [Article]. Health Services Research, 31(1), 21-37. 115 .Malin, J. L., Kahn, K. L., Adams, J., Kwan, L., Laouri, M., & Ganz, P. A. (2002). Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. [Article]. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(11), 835-844. 116 .Marcin, J. P., Li, Z. M., Kravitz, R. L., Dai, J. J., Rocke, D. M., & Romano, P. S. (2008). The CABG surgery volume-outcome relationship: Temporal trends and selection effects in California, 1998-2004. [Article]. Health Services Research, 43(1), 174-192. 117 .Maxwell, J., Briscoe, F., Davidson, S., Eisen, L., Robbins, M., Temin, P., et al. (1998). Managed competition in practice: 'Value purchasing' by fourteen employers. Health Affairs, 17(3), 216-226. 118 .McAlearney, A. S. (2008). Using leadership development programs to improve quality and efficiency in healthcare. [Article]. Journal of Healthcare Management, 53(5), 319-331. 119 .McDonald, John Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, In Press, Corrected Proof. 120 .McGuire, A. (1987). The Measurement of Hospital Efficiency. [Article]. Social Science & Medicine, 24(9), 719-724. 121 .McKay, N. L., & Deily, M. E. (2008). Cost inefficiency and hospital health outcomes. [Article]. Health Economics, 17(7), 833-848. 122 .McKee, M. D., Cropp, M. D., Hyland, A., Watroba, N., McKinley, B., & Edge, S. B. (2002). Provider case volume and outcome in the evaluation and treatment of patients with mammogram-detected breast carcinoma. [Article]. Cancer, 95(4), 704-712. 123 .Mikeljevic, J. S., Haward, R. A., Johnston, C., Sainsbury, R., & Forman, D. (2003). Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. [Article]. British Journal of Cancer, 89(3), 487-491. 124 .Milstein, A., Galvin, R. S., Delbanco, S. F., Salber, P., & Buck, C. R., Jr. (2000). Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract, 3(6), 313-316. 125 .Mirza, A. N., Mirza, N. Q., Vlastos, G., & Singletary, S. E. (2002). Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer - A review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years. [Review]. Annals of Surgery, 235(1), 10-26. 126 .Moerbeek, M., van Breukelen, G. J. P., & Berger, M. P. (2003). A comparison between traditional methods and multilevel regression for the analysis of multicenter intervention studies. [Article]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(4), 341-350. 127 .Morey, R. C., Fine, D. J., Loree, S. W., Retzlaffroberts, D. L., & Tsubakitani, S. (1992). The Trade-Off between Hospital Cost and Quality of Care - an Exploratory Empirical-Analysis. Medical Care, 30(8), 677-698. 128 .Mori, I., Yang, Q. F., & Kakudo, K. (2002). Predictive and prognostic markers for invasive breast cancer. [Review]. Pathology International, 52(3), 186-194. 129 .Naeim, A., Sawhney, R., MacLean, C. H., & Sanati, H. (2007). Quality indicators for the care of breast cancer in vulnerable elders. [Review]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, S258-S269. 130 .Nagel, G., Wedding, U., Hoyer, H., Rohrig, B., & Katenkamp, D. (2004). The impact of comorbidity on the survival of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. [Article]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 130(11), 664-670. 131 .Nayar, P., & Ozcan, Y. A. (2008). Data Envelopment Analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. [Article]. Journal of Medical Systems, 32(3), 193-199. 132 .Neuner, J. M., Gilligan, M. A., Sparapani, R., Laud, P. W., Haggstrom, D., & Nattinger, A. B. (2004). Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States. [Proceedings Paper]. Cancer, 101(6), 1323-1329. 133 .Newhouse, Joseph P. (1970). Toward a Theory of Nonprofit Institutions: An Economic Model of a Hospital. The American Economic Review, 60(1), 64-74. 134 .Panageas, K. S., Schrag, D., Localio, A. R., Venkatraman, E. S., & Begg, C. B. (2007). Properties of analysis methods that account for clustering in volume-outcome studies when the primary predictor is cluster size. [Article]. Statistics in Medicine, 26(9), 2017-2035. 135 .Parkin, D., & Hollingsworth, B. (1997). Measuring production efficiency of acute hospitals in Scotland, 1991-94: validity issues in data envelopment analysis. [Article]. Applied Economics, 29(11), 1425-1433. 136 .Parkin, D.M., Whelan, S.L., Ferlay, J., and Storm, H., & International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2005). Cancer Incidence in Five Continents- Volume VIII WHO Press 137 .Perlin, J. B., Kolodner, R. M., & Roswell, R. H. (2004). The Veterans Health Administration: Quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. [Editorial Material]. American Journal of Managed Care, 10(11), 828-836. 138 .Peter S. Hussey, Han de Vries, John Romley, Margaret C. Wang, Susan S. Chen, Paul G. Shekelle, Elizabeth A. McGlynn, (2009). A Systematic Review of Health Care Efficiency Measures. Health Services Research, 44(3), 784-805. 139 .Peterson, O. L., & Bloom, B. S. (1983). Regionalization of Surgical Services. American Journal of Public Health, 73(2), 179-183. 140 .Piccirillo, J. F., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). Clinical symptoms and comorbidity: Significance for the prognostic classification of cancer. [Article]. Cancer, 77(5), 834-842. 141 .Porter, M. E. (2008). Value-Based Health Care Delivery. [Editorial Material]. Annals of Surgery, 248(4), 503-509. 142 .Porter, M. E., & Teisberg, E. O. (2007). How physicians can change the future of health care. [Article]. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(10), 1103-1111. 143 .Porter, Michael E., & Teisberg, Elizabeth Olmsted (2006). Redefining health care : creating value-based competition on results. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press. 144 .Rampaul, R. S., Pinder, S. E., Elston, C. W., & Ellis, I. O. (2001). Prognostic and predictive factors in primary breast cancer and their role in patient management: The Nottingham Breast Team. [Review]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 27(3), 229-238. 145 .Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN (Version 2.10): Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol,. 146 .Rathore, S. S., Epstein, A. J., Vopp, K. G. M., & Krumholz, H. M. (2004). Hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery volume and patient mortality, 1998-2000. [Article]. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 110-117. 147 .Raudenbush, Stephen W., Bryk, Anthony S., & Congdon, Richard T. (2008). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling Scientific Software International Inc. 148 .Reid, R. J., MacWilliam, L., Verhulst, L., Roos, N., & Atkinson, M. (2001). Performance of the ACG case-mix system in two Canadian provinces. [Article]. Medical Care, 39(1), 86-99. 149 .Reid, R. J., Roos, N. P., MacWilliam, L., Frohlich, N., & Black, C. (2002). Assessing population health care need using a claims-based ACG morbidity measure: A validation analysis in the province of Manitoba. [Article]. Health Services Research, 37(5), 1345-1364. 150 .Roland, M. (1999). Quality and efficiency: enemies or partners? [Proceedings Paper]. British Journal of General Practice, 49(439), 140-143. 151 .Roohan, P. J., Bickell, N. A., Baptiste, M. S., Therriault, G. D., Ferrara, E. P., & Siu, A. L. (1998). Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health, 88(3), 454-457. 152 .Rosko, Michael D., & Mutter, Ryan L. (2010). What Have We Learned From the Application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis to U.S. Hospitals? Med Care Res Rev, 1077558710370686. 153 .Sainsbury, R., Haward, B., Rider, L., Johnston, C., & Round, C. (1995). Influence of Clinician Workload and Patterns of Treatment on Survival from Breast-Cancer. Lancet, 345(8960), 1265-1270. 154 .Satariano, W. A., & Ragland, D. R. (1994). The Effect of Comorbidity on 3-Year Survival of Women with Primary Breast-Cancer. [Article]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120(2), 104-110. 155 .Schachter, H. M., Mamaladze, V., Lewin, G., Graham, I. D., Brouwers, M., Sampson, M., et al. (2006). Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: A systematic review. [Review]. Bmc Cancer, 6. 156 .Schachter, H.M., Mamaladze, V. , Lewin, G., Paszat, L. , Verma, S., DeGrasse, C. , et al. (2004). Measuring the Quality of | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8609 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景: 醫療照護服務量與照護結果的關係研究在過去數十年間被廣泛的探討,儘管多數的研究支持服務量大的醫院或醫師其照護結果較佳,但仍有研究者獲得不一致的結果並且質疑以服務量多寡用於預測照護的結果是否可靠。相較於服務量,測量醫療服務提供者的效率不僅關注提供醫療照護的多寡,而且也考慮到提供相關照護所耗用的資源。近期美國衛生部醫療服務中心(CMS)執行的「價值基礎的醫療服務購買計畫」(Value-Based PurchasingPlan)亦即是同時注重改善醫療照護提供者的效率與品質。因此,在抑制醫療照護成本與提升照護品質並重的趨勢下,如何將過去探討醫療服務量與照護結果的關係擴展到評估醫療服務供給者的效率、過程面品質對照護結果的影響,對於醫療保險機構、雇主、被保險人,乃至於醫療照護提供者皆是很重要的議題。材料與方法:本研究將採用多層次的Cox's 風險比例迴歸模型,探討醫療服務提供者的過程面品質與效率對乳癌病患存活情形的影響。資料來源為合併台灣癌症資料庫、健保資料庫、死亡登記等次級資料,選取2003 及2004 年首次診斷且接受手術治療的乳癌患者進行研究。過程面品質的測量將採用文獻發展的乳癌核心測量指標,而醫療服務提供者的效率則以資料包絡分析法(DEA)進行分析。統計分析過程中亦同時控制病患的共病狀態與疾病嚴重度。結果:由26 家醫院治療的6,396 位女性乳癌患者被納入此研究。統計分析結果發現,在控制病患、醫院及醫師的基本特性後,醫院或醫師的手術量及醫院的效率與乳癌患者的復發或存活無關。過程面品質測量得分較高的患者,其存活較佳且有較低的復發率。多層次分析結果顯示,在醫院-病患的巢狀樣本結構中存在變動效果(random effect),但是這樣的效果在醫師-病患的樣本結構中並不明顯。本研究並發現醫院或醫師層級的過程面品質,對於病患層次的過程面品質具有調節效果(moderating effect)。
結論:醫院或醫師手術量與乳癌的復發或存活無關,服務量對於過程面品質亦無存在調節效應。探討服務量及照護結果的研究應該將巢狀樣本結果的特性納入考量,並應用多層次的分析方法。未來相關研究應嘗試以縱貫性研究探討,是否可以藉由改變醫療服務提供者的效率來影響醫療照護的結果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The volume-outcome relationship has been widely discussed over past decades. Although previous studies examined the volume-outcome relationship show that the majority of these works support the reverse relationship of volume and outcome on varied procedures, but other studiess reported inconsistent results and raised arguments if volume is robust enough to predict outcome. Comparing to volume, efficiency not only emphasizes on the quantity of service provided by organizations, but also focus on the resources consumed to generate services. The Value-Based Purchasing Plan carried out by CMS recently also emphasizing on improving efficiency as well as clinical quality. Therefore, extending volume-outcome association to measuring efficiency as well as process quality of care, and linking the performance with outcome have been important issues to not only health purchasers, but also providers and consumers when pursuing cost containment and quality improvement in health care. Material and method: This study is going to explore the relationship between process quality, efficiency and survival as well as recurrence in breast cancer care by Cox’s regression and multilevel modeling, with using Taiwan Cancer Database combined with Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (NHID) and death registry. Breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2003 to 2004 and received surgical treatment will be included in this study. Process quality will be measured by a set of core measure indicators, and constant returns to scale (CRS) input oriented data envelope analysis (DEA) method will be used for measuring efficiency of individual hospital. Comorbidity and severity of illness will also be controlled in analysis. Result: 6,396 female breast cancer patients, reported by 26 hospitals, were included in this study. After controlled for patient and provider characteristics, hospital and physician’s surgical volume for breast cancer as well as hospital efficiency are not associated with the patient survival or recurrence. Patients received care with high process quality is associated with better survival and lower recurrence. The multilevel analyses found random effect for the hospital-patients clustered sample, but the effect for physician-patient clusters is not as significant. This study also found the provider’s process quality also has the moderating effect for patient-level process quality. Conclusion: Volume is not associated with breast cancer recurrence or survival, nor it has moderating effect on process quality. The clustered feature of data should be considered for volume-outcome related studies. Future researches should apply a longitudinal design to explore how quality related health outcomes can be affected by a change in provider efficiency. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T19:58:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-D93843004-1.pdf: 1789952 bytes, checksum: 2d2c2e65a6cdd57f3342d77b09b516ae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 ......................................................... 3
List of Figures............................................... II Abstract....................................................... V 摘要 ......................................................... VI Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................... 1 1.2 Research Objectives ...................................... 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review ................................. 5 2.1 Surgery Volume and Outcome ............................... 5 2.2 Efficiency in health care ............................... 13 2.3 Measure quality of breast cancer care ................... 20 2.4 Measure comorbidity in breast cancer .................... 23 2.5 Multilevel analysis in health care research ............. 27 2.6 Summary ................................................. 29 Chapter 3: Material and Methods ............................. 42 3.1 Conceptual Framework .................................... 42 3.2 Hypotheses .............................................. 43 3.3 Data Sources ............................................ 44 3.4 Patient Selection and Data Linkage ...................... 46 3.5 Measures ................................................ 47 3.6 Statistical Analysis .................................... 50 Chapter 4: Result ........................................... 56 4.1 Descriptive analysis..................................... 56 4.2 Result of Cox’s proportional hazard models.............. 59 4.3 Result of multilevel mixed effect models ................ 62 Chapter 5: Discussion ....................................... 92 5.1 Discussion for result ................................... 92 5.2 Limitation .............................................. 98 5.3 Contributions of this study ..............................100 Chapter 6: Conclusion and suggestion .........................102 6.1 Conclusion .............................................. 102 6.2 Suggestion .............................................. 102 Reference ................................................... 105 Appendix .................................................... 116 Model specification of multilevel mixed effect models ....... 116 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 是否醫療服務量之大小確實會影響患者之照護結果?
- 以台灣乳癌醫療照護為例,探討醫療服務提供者之技術效率、過程面品質與服務量對於病患復發與存活狀態之相關性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Does service volume really matter to outcome?
Examining the association of process quality, technical efficiency, and surgical volume to breast cancer recurrence and survival | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 賴美淑(Mei-Shu Lai) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳肖琪(Shiao-Chi Wu),林寬佳(Kuan-Chia Lin),鄭鴻鈞(Skye Hung-Chun Cheng),楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 乳癌,醫療品質,手術量,效率,多層次分析,存活分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | breast cancer,quality of care,efficiency,volume-outcome relationship,multilevel analysis,survival analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.75 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。