請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8602
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思寬(Shi-Kuan Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Heng Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡仲恆 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T19:58:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-12 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T19:58:50Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1.沈中華(1992),「用無拋補利率平價說解釋臺灣利率與美元匯率的變動」,企銀季刊,第十六卷,第一期,第1–13頁。 2.萬哲鈺(1995),「匯率動態之非線性分析」,企銀季刊,第十八卷,第三期,第98–105頁。 3.黃德芬(1997),「台灣地區風險利率平價說之驗證-解除外匯管制前後之比較」,台灣銀行台灣經濟金融月刊,第三十三卷,第一期,第14–27頁。 4.黎明淵、紀燕翎(2002),「購買力平價說對匯率動態有解釋能力嗎?–台幣與美元匯率實證結果」,亞太經濟合作評論,第九期,第50–71頁。 5.楊奕農、楊明憲(2003),「生產效率估計之非線性考量:平滑轉換迴歸在台灣農業部門生產效率估計之應用」,農業經濟半年刊,第七十四期,第1–21頁。 6.曹清宗(2005),「拋補利率平價說之實證研究–以台灣與美國為例」,台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 7.張玉芹、林桂軍、汪壽陽(2006),「東盟五國匯率序列的非線性檢驗」,系統工程理論與實踐,第十一期。 8.李建強、張佩鈴、陳珮芬(2006),「台灣毛豬市場批發價格的非線性模型分析」,農業經濟半年刊,第80期,第59–95頁。 9.陳仕偉、陳秀香(2007),「貨幣模型能否解釋匯率的波動行為–臺灣與韓國的實證研究」,臺灣銀行季刊,第五十八卷,第四期,第160–182頁。 10.寶華綜合研究院(2007),「利差交易與近期全球金融市場走勢」。 11.吳博欽、申志偉、潘聖潔(2009),「匯率的非線性調整,套利與經濟價值可預測性」,人文及社會科學集刊,第二十一卷,第一期,第101–142頁。 二、英文部分 1.Akaike, H.(1974), “A new look at the statistical model identification”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), pp.716-723. 2.Carvalho, J.V., Sachsida, A., Loureiro, P.R.A., and Moreira, T.B.S.(2005), “Uncovered Interest Parity in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico: A Unit Root Test Application with Panel Data”, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 16, pp.263-269. 3.Chen S.L., and Wu J.L.(2000), “A re-examination of purchasing power parity in Japan and Taiwan”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), pp.271-284. 4.Cumby, R.E., and Obstfeld, M.(1981), “A Note on Exchange-Rate Expectations and Nominal Interest Differentials”, Journal of Finance, 36, pp.697-704. 5.Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A.(1979), “Distribution of the Estimation for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, pp.427-31. 6.Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A.(1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, pp. 1057-72. 7.Fama, E.(1984), “Forward and Spot Exchange Rates”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 14, pp.319-338. 8.Gagnon, J.E., and Chaboud, A.P.(2007), “What can the data tell us about carry trades in Japanese yen?”, International Finance Discussion Papers, Board of 47 Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 9.Gyntelberg, J., and Remolona, E.M.(2007), “Risk in carry trades: a look at target currencies in Asia and the Pacific”, BIS Quarterly Review. 10.Hansen, L.P., and Hodrick, R.J.(1980), “Forward Exchange Rates as Optimal Predictors of Future Spot Rates: An Econometric Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 88(5), pp.829-853. 11.Hurvich, C.M., and Tsai, C.L.(1989), “Regression and time series model selection in small samples”, Biometrika, 76(2), pp.297-307. 12.Ito, T.(1988), “Use of (time-domain) vector autoregressions to test uncovered interest parity”, The review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2), pp.296-305. 13.Jones, S.(2009), “Deviations from covered interest parity during the credit crisis”, NYU Stern Business School working paper. 14.Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., and Snell, A.(2003), “Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework”, Journal of Econometrics, 112, pp.359-379. 15.Lee, B.J.(2007), “Uncovered Interest Parity:Cross-sectionalEvidence”, MPRA Paper. 16.MacDonald, R., and Torrance, T.S. (1989), “Some survey-based tests of uncovered interest parity”, In Exchange Rates and Open Economy Macroeconomics, eds. R. MacDonald and M.P. Taylor, Mass.: Blackwell, pp.239-248. 17.MacDonald, R., and Taylor, M.P.,(1993), “The monetary approach to the exchange rate: rational expectations, long-run equilibrium, and forecasting”, IMF Staff Papers, 40, pp.89-107. 18.Mehl, A., and Cappiello, L.(2009), “Uncovered Interest Parity at Long Horizons: Evidence on Emerging Economies”, Review of International Economics, 17(5), pp.1019-1037. 19.Michael, P., Nobay, A.R., and Peel, D.A.(1997), “Transactions Cost and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates:an Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Political Economy, 105, pp.862-879. 20.Nishigaki, H.(2007), “Relationship between the yen carry trade and the related financial variables”, Economics Bulletin. 21.Peter, E.E.(1994), “Fractal Market Analysis:Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Econometrics”, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 22.Said, S., and Dickey, D.(1984), “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Model of Unknown Order”, Biometrica, 71, pp.599-607. 23.Sarantis, N.(1999), ”Modeling non-linearities in real effective exchange rates”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, pp.27-45. 24.Schwarz, G.(1978), “Estimating the dimension of a model”, Annals of Statistics, 6, pp.461-464. 25.Schwert, G.W.(1987), “Effects of model specification on tests for unit roots in macroeconomic data”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 20(1), pp.73-103. 26.Taylor, M.P.(1987), “Risk premia and foreign Exchange: a multiple time series approach to testing uncovered interest-rate parity”, Review of World Economics, 123, pp.579-591. 27.Taylor, M.P., and Allen, H.(1992), “The use of technical analysis in the foreign exchange market”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 11, pp.304-314. 28.Teräsvirta, T.(1994), “Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), pp.208-218. 29.Teräsvirta, T., and Anderson, H.M.(1992), “Characterizing Nonlinearities in Business Cycles using Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, pp.S119-S139. 30.Teräsvirta, T. , and Granger, C.W.J.(1993), “Modeling Nonlinear Economic Relationships”, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 31.Thornton, D.L.(1989), “Tests of Covered Interest Rate Parity”, Federal Reserve Bank of ST. Louis, July/August, pp.55-66. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8602 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以非線性平滑轉換自我迴歸(STAR)模型,針對日本、美國、澳洲、英國、歐元區等國進行已拋補利率平價說之實證研究。當已拋補利率平價說成立時,代表該國間的利差交易,無法獲得額外利益;反之,當已拋補利率平價說不成立時,代表資金持有者可藉由利差交易,獲得額外利益。
研究結果發現歐元區對日本之兩國利差與遠期匯率折、溢價幅度的差值(D)存在線性關係。澳洲對日本、英國對日本可用STAR模型描述D值之偏離調整過程,而美國對日本,由於調整速度(γ)過大,使STAR模型退化為非線性TAR模型。但根據均方根差判斷,三組非線性模型均具有良好之預測能力。 在預測結果方面,美國對日本、英國對日本在預測期間內已拋補利率平價說大致成立,也隱含金融市場及外匯市場為有效率,因此無法藉利差交易獲取額外利益。而澳洲對日本,已拋補利率平價說僅在預測初期有成立,長期下逐漸偏離已拋補利率平價說均衡,金融市場及外匯市場不具效率,因此對於此國家組合,資金持有者將可藉利差交易獲取額外利益。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This empirical study of Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP) is conducted on the basis of non-linear Smooth Transition Autoregressive Model, focusing on five areas including Japan, the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the Euro zone. When CIRP holds, no abnormal gain can be derived from carry trade; in contrast, when CIRP cannot be supported, capital holders can obtain abnormal profit from carry trade.
The result demonstrates that a linear relationship exists in the difference (D) between interest spread and forward exchange rate discount (or premium) of the Euro zone and Japan. In the cases of Australia against Japan and the UK against Japan, STAR model can be used to describe the process of adjustment for D`s deviation. While the high speed of transition (γ) of the United States against Japan causes STAR model to recede to TAR model. These three non-linear models possess excellent predictive power, according to the root mean square error. In the forecasted periods, CIRPs of the United States against Japan and the UK against Japan sustain in nearly all periods, suggesting the financial markets and the foreign exchange markets are efficient. Therefore, capital holders cannot obtain abnormal profit from carry trade. In the case of Australia against Japan, CIRP can be supported only in the initial periods. Then it gradually deviates from CIPR equilibrium in the long term, causing inefficiency of the financial markets and the foreign exchange markets. Hence, investors can obtain abnormal profit from carry trade. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T19:58:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97724022-1.pdf: 793710 bytes, checksum: 7c45d76ffd0fb1550c81b7a51d350c94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第四節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 利率平價說 6 第二節 利差交易(CARRY TRADE) 8 第三節 匯率之非線性波動 9 第四節 平滑轉換自我迴歸模型 10 第三章 理論模型與研究方法 12 第一節 利率平價說 12 第二節 單根檢定 16 第三節 平滑轉換自我迴歸模型 23 第四章 實證結果分析 30 第一節 資料來源與前置處理 30 第二節 實證結果 33 第五章 結論與建議 49 第一節 結論 49 第二節 未來建議 50 參考文獻 51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探討利差交易可行性-以平滑轉換自我迴歸模型驗證利率平價說 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on feasibility of carry trade - Validation of interest rate parity based on the smooth transition autoregressive model | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 萬哲鈺(Jer-Yuh Wan),張銘仁(Ming-Jen Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 非線性,平滑轉換自我迴歸模型,利差交易,利率平價說, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | nonlinearity,smooth transition autoregressive,carry trade,covered interest parity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 775.11 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。