請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85885
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃心怡(Hsini Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chin-Huai Shih | en |
dc.contributor.author | 施沁懷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:27:40Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-09-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王立恒,2017,〈【e政府創新應用】警察執勤全面行動化,手機成敏捷辦案必需品〉,iThome,取自:https://www.ithome.com.tw/article/117303,檢閱日期:2021/7/31。 王光旭,2015,〈社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用〉,《調查研究—方法與應用》,34: 67-134。 王捷,2020,〈從超商到賴神的家 台南警巡邏簽到仍用紙本〉,自由時報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/3090342,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 朱宣怡,2019,〈2019智慧城市展─智慧警政是未來城市安全的關鍵〉,《警光》,755: 54-63。 呂妍庭,2020,〈巡邏箱智慧化 也有城鄉差距〉,中時電子報,取自:https://reurl.cc/RbM4Q9,檢閱日期,2021/12/4。 李仲彬,2010,〈影響全球電子治理發展的因素:以政策擴散理論爲基礎的分析〉,《公共行政學報》,36: 39-89。 李仲彬,2016,〈從哪來的創新想法?地方政府創新來源與創新政策特質的分析〉,《公共行政學報》,50: 1-42。 李擷瓔,2020,〈嘉市「嘉e巡簽–智慧巡邏箱」2.0升級版3/18全面啟用〉,大紀元新聞網,取自:https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/20/3/17/n11947082.htm。 阮孝齊、王麗雲,2017,〈縣市教育資源對學習共同體擴散影響之研究〉,《教育研究集刊》,63(1): 69-107。 孟繁勳、王俊元、詹永茂,2020,〈影響政策學習效果因素之研究:臺灣地方政府成立騎警隊之分析,《東吳政治學報》,38(1): 57-112。 林奐均,2013,〈基於近場通訊之行動校園巡邏與安全通報系統〉,國立臺灣師範大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。 林悅,2017,〈區域聯防緝毒會議 雲嘉南檢警調、海巡海關齊聚南檢〉ETtoday新聞雲,取自:https://www.ettoday.net/news/20170608/941088.htm,檢閱日期:2021/6/20。 林逸新,2012,〈透過RFID系統修正警察巡邏勤務模式及員警接受程度之探討〉,國立臺南大學經營與管理學系科技管理碩士班碩士論文。 林毅,2020,〈游錫堃恐嚇案警署定調「處理不周」 網:這人完蛋了〉,中時新聞網,取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20200306000038-260405?chdtv,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 洪世章、曾詠青、賴俊彥,2018,〈質量融合:基於複雜科學觀點下的探索〉,《中山管理評論》,26(2),331-360。 柯于璋,2012,〈政策移植與移植政策評估指標之建立—結合政策過程與知識應用之雙元演化觀點〉,《公共行政學報》,43: 63-90。 柯于璋,2016,〈我國「閱讀起步走」政策創新與擴散之研究 -政策知識管理的研究途徑〉,《公共行政學報》,51: 35-67。 凌國硯,2012,〈我國警察組織文化之研究—以後現代論述探討〉,中央警察大學行政管理學系碩士論文。 桃園市議會,2020,〈桃園市議會第2屆第3次定期會及第7-9次臨時會議事錄〉,取自:https://www.tycc.gov.tw/attach/202010/20201027153451.pdf,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 翁順裕,2010,〈從網絡的結構分析探討「技術位置」與「技術角色」- 以保險商業方法專利為例〉,《管理學報》,27(2): 97-122。 翁伊森,2021,〈雲嘉南「區域聯防」 逮酒駕5件3人法辦〉,ETtoday新聞雲,取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20210501/1971925.htm#ixzz6ytM0L0xN,檢閱日期:2021/6/20。 高雄市議會,2020,〈警消衛環部門業務質詢及答復─第3屆第4次定期大會第12次會議〉,取自:https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/System/Bulletin/View.aspx?scan=1&BulletinSN=239271&pages=7321,7322#pdfStart,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 張志盛、陳少文、呂正國、陳炯志,2012,〈E化電子巡邏〉,臺北市創意提案會報提案成效表,取自:https://wwwws.gov.taipei/001/Upload/public/Attachment/312281633847.pdf,檢閱日期:2021/7/28。 張書誠,2013,〈基於NFC、iBeacon之智慧型安全校園巡邏通報系統〉,國立師範大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。 張高禎,2019,〈警政創新 全國首創—臺北市政府警察局「巡邏箱電子化」專案經驗分享〉,《警光》,751: 78-86。 陳文嬋,2011,〈e化電子巡邏箱 高市首創〉,自由時報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/index.php/news/local/paper/506072,檢閱日期,2021/7/22。 陳序廷、黃東益,2011,〈為什麼創新先驅成為後進者?臺北市政府的行車倒數計時顯示器政策學習過程〉,《公共行政學報》,40: 77-110。 陳明傳,2021,〈訪查勤務之新發展〉,《警光》,774: 35-41。 陳俊安,2012,〈日治時期臺灣總督府新竹地區的客家社會統治:以《警友》雜誌為例〉,國立中央大學客家社會文化研究所碩士論文。 陳鈞瑋,2019,〈使用生物識別技術於行動裝置巡邏簽章〉,國立臺北教育大學資訊科學系碩士論文。 陳鴻偉,2018,〈電子巡簽防懶 員警被迫站壁〉,中時新聞網,取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20181104000583-260106?chdtv,檢閱日期:2021/7/30。 許政智,2016,〈以近場通訊為基礎的警察巡邏勤務系統〉,中央警察大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 黃立翔、邱俊福,2005,〈勒頸砍刺 2匪奪槍 警1死1傷〉,自由時報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/10601,檢閱日期:2021/10/05。 黃東益,2004,〈全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向:府際政策學習〉,《國家政策季刊》,3(1): 135-154。 湯道舜,2019,〈汐止殺警奪槍案 兄弟檔雙煞膽大妄為〉,TvBS新聞網,取自:https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/1185525,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 曾紀秀,2020,〈全國首創IoT智慧巡邏箱 物聯網創新應用抵嘉〉,《警光》,766: 46-51。 程炳璋,2021,〈簽巡邏箱改電子化 警員:手機老舊無法感應〉,中時新聞網,取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20210423004253-260402?chdtv,檢閱日期2021/7/30。 楊金城、王涵平,2021,〈南市警電子巡簽5月底上路 巡邏「摸魚」此情可待成追憶〉,自由時報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3502518,檢閱日期:2021/7/29。 詹智涵、王宏文,2014,〈基層警察跨區域犯罪偵查合作之困境〉,《法政學報》,26:82-116。 嘉義市政府,2019,〈雲嘉嘉南四縣市智慧資安區域聯防啟動 黃市長:把該做的事情做的更好更對〉,取自:https://www.chiayi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=455&s=369729,檢閱日期:2021/6/20。 廖俊松、曾憲華,2006,〈全球化下地方警政跨域治理之初探〉,《中國地方自治》,《中國地方自治》,59(2): 3-18。 熊瑞梅、王光旭,2012,〈政策網絡中的對偶互動及其解釋因素:以台中市都市發展政策的菁英網絡為例,1986-1992〉,《政治科學論叢》,51: 1-50。 臺南市議會,2021,〈議員林美燕-台南市推電⼦巡簽要求設備⼀次到位〉,取自:https://www.tncc.gov.tw/page.asp?mainid=C035E7AA-4AC8-41F9-93B7-0646770C8A5D,檢閱日期:2021/7/30。 劉文淵,2020,〈警方巡邏箱電子化成趨勢 全台4縣市試辦〉,蘋果新聞網,取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/local/20200305/YOM2UZBZKDPAKBO6TDRVNJN7ZE/,檢閱日期:2021/1/2。 劉亮文,2008,〈RFID 結合 GPS 應用於電子巡檢系統之研究:以「校園電子巡檢系統」為例〉,義守大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 鄧邦群,2010,〈勤務創新加用心 民眾居住更放心〉,《警光》,649: 16-21。 Abrahamson, E. & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289-309. Bala, V. & Goyal, S. (1998). Learning from Neighbors. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 595-621. Bailey, A. & Rom, M. (2004). A Wider Race: Interstate Competition Across Health and Welfare Programs. Journal of Politics, 66, 326-347. Becker, M. (1970). Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267-282. Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. G., & Voorberg, W. H. (2013). From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector: A literature review of relevant drivers and barriers. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Berry, F. S. & Berry, W. D. (1990). State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis, The American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415. Berry, F. S. & Berry, W. D. (2018). Innovation and Difiusion Models in Policy Research. In Christopher, M. W.& Sabatier, P. A. (Ed)., Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 253-297). New York: Routledge. Berry, W. D. & Baybeck, B. (2005). Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition. The American Political Science Review, 99(4), 505-519. Blatter, J., Portmann, L. & Rausis, F. (2022). Theorizing Policy Diffusion: From a Patchy Set of Mechanisms to a Paradigmatic Typology. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(6), 805-825. Boehmke, F. (2009). Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1125-1140. Braun, D. & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298-322. Burkhardt, M. & Brass, D. (1990). Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, Pennsylvania, 35, 104-127. Burt, R. (1987). Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287-1335. Burt, R. (2000). Decay functions. Social Networks, 22, 1-28. Cao, X. (2010). Networks as Channels of Policy Diffusion: Explaining Worldwide Changes in Capital Taxation, 1998–2006. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 823-854. Cao, X. & Prakash, A. (2010). Growing Exports by Signaling Product Quality: Trade Competition and the Cross-National Diffusion of ISO 9000 Quality Standards. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 111-135. Ceci, F. & Iubatti, D. (2012). Personal relationships and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach. Research Policy, 41, 565-579. Chandler, D. & Hwang, H. (2015). Learning From Learning Theory: A Model of Organizational Adoption Strategies at the Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1446-1476. Coleman, J., Katz, E. & Menzal, H. (1957). The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253-270. Cranmer, S. & Desmarais, B. (2016). A Critique of Dyadic Design. International Studies Quarter, 60, 355-362. Cranmer, S., Desmarais, B. & Campell, B. (2020). The contagion of democracy through international networks. Social Network, 61, 87-98. De Vire, H., Bekkers, V. & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: a Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration Review, 94(1), 146-166. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Garlick, A. (2022). Laboratories of Politics: There is Bottom-up Diffusion of Policy Attention in the American Federal System. Political Research Quarterly, Early Review. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185。 Gerring, J. (2007). The Mechanismic Worldview: Thinking Inside the Box. British Journal of Political Science, 38 (1), 161-179. Gilardi, F. (2010). Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650-666. Gilardi, F. & Füglister, K. (2008). Empirical modeling of policy diffusion in federal states: the dyadic approach. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3), 413-450. Goyal, N. (2021). Policy Diffusion Through Multiple Streams: The (Non-) Adoption of Energy Conservation Building Code in India. Policy Studies Journal, Early Review. Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. & Volden, C. (2013). The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317. Jacobson, D. (2016). How and Why Network Governance Evolves: Evidence from a Public Safety Network. Electron Markets, 26, 43-54. Jokisaari, M.& Vuori, J. (2009). The Role of Reference Groups and Network Position in the Timing of Employment Service Adoption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 137-156. Kammerer, M.& Namhata, C. (2018). What Drives the Adoption of Climate Change Mitigation Policy? A Dynamic Network Approach to Policy Diffusion. Policy Sciences, 51, 477-513. Karch, A. & Craven, M. (2014). Rapid Diffusion and Policy Reform: The Adoption and Modification of Three Strikes Laws. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14(4), 461-491. Kim, T. & Rhee, M. (2017). Structural and Behavioral Antecedents of Change: Status, Distinctiveness, and Relative Performance. Journal of Management, 43(2), 716-741. King, G. & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137-63. Kuhlmann, J., De Reufels, D., Schlichte, K. & Nullmeier, F. How Social Policy Travels: A Refined Model of Diffusion. Global Social Policy, 20(1), 80-96. Lee, C. K. & Strang, D. (2006). The International Diffusion of Public Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning. International Organization, 60 (4), 883-909. Lee, I., Lee, Y. & Feiock, R. (2011). Competitors and Cooperators: A Micro-Level Analysis of Regional Economic Development Collaboration Networks. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 253-262. Li, J. & Chung, K. (2020). Decomposing Isomorphism: What Drives Similarity in the Adoption of New Public Management? Administration & Society, 52(3), 375–404. Liu, W. & Yi, H. (2021). Policy diffusion through leadership transfer networks: Direct or indirect connections? Governance, 1-20. Lingiardi, V., Holmqvist, R. & Safran, J. (2016). Relational Turn and Psychotherapy Research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 52(2), 275-312. Lorrain, F. & White, H. (1971). Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 49-80. Lubell, M., Scholz, J., Berardo, R. & Robins, G. (2012). Testing Policy Theory with Statistical Models of Networks. The Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 351-374. Maggetti, M. & Gilardi, F. (2016). Problems (and Solutions) in the Measurement of Policy Diffusion Mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1), 87-107. Mallison, D. J. (2020). Policy Innovation Adoption Across the Diffusion Life Course. Policy Studies Journal, Early Review. Marsh, D.& Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269-288. McCord, E. (1980). Structural-functionalism and the Network Idea: Towards an Integrated Methodology, Social Networks, 2(4), 371-383. Meseguer, C. (2006). Rational Learning and Bounded Learning in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. Rationality and Society, 18(1): 35-66. Minkman, E., van Buuren, M. W.& Bekkers, J. J. M. (2018). Policy Transfer Routes: An Evidence-Based Conceptual Model to Explain Policy Adoption. Policy Studies, 39(2), 222-250. Mintrom, M.& Vergari, S. (1998). Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148. Mitchell, J. L. (2018). Does Policy Diffusion Need Space? Spatializing the Dynamics of Policy Diffusion. The Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 424-451. Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of Innovation in Organizations. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 111-126. Morris, M. G. & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions: Implications for a Changing Work Force. Personnel Psychology, 53, 375-403. Mossberger, K. (1999). State-Federal Diffusion and Policy Learning: From Enterprise Zones to Empowerment Zones. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 29(3), 31-50. Motta, M. (2018). Policy Diffusion and Directionality: Tracing Early Adoption of Offshore Wind Policy. Review of Policy Research, 35(3), 398-421. Nie, K., Lin, S., Ma, T. & Nakamori, Y. (2010). Connecting Informal Networks to Management of Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(2), 237-253. O’Toole, L. (2014). Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 361-371. Prandini, R. (2015). Relational Sociology: A Well-defined Sociological Paradigm or a Challenging ‘Relational Turn’ in Sociology? International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 1-14. Porfiri, M. & Marín, M. (2018). Information Flow in a Model of Policy Diffusion: An Analytical Study. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 5(1), 42-54. Rodrigue, J. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems (5th ed). New York: Routledge. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed). New York: Free Press. Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press. Sailer, L. (1978). Structural Equivalence: Meaning and Definition, Computation and Application. Social Networks, 1, 73-90. Selg, P. (2016). Two Faces of the “Relational Turn”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(1), 27-31. Shipan, C. R. & Volden, C. (2006). Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States. American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 825-843. Shipan, C. R. & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840-857. Shipan, C. R. & Volden, C. (2012). Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788-¬796. Starke, P. (2013). Qualitative Methods for the Study of Policy Diffusion: Challenges and Available Solutions. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 561-582. Su, C., Chang, C., Chen, C.& Tu, C. (2014). QR Codes & Gps Functions - New Applications in Taiwan. Paper presented at 2014 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13-16 July 2014, Lanchou, China. Thisted, E. & Thisted, R. (2020). The Diffusion of Carbon Taxes and Emission Trading Schemes: The Emerging Norm of Carbon Pricing. Environmental Politics, 29(5), 804-824. Tyran, J. & Sausgruber, R. (2005). The diffusion of policy innovations – an experimental investigation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 423-442. Van der Heijden, M. & Schalk, J. (2020). Network Relationships and Standard Adoption: Diffusion Effects in Transnational Regulatory Networks. Public Administration, 98: 768-784. Villadsen, A. (2011). Structural Embeddedness of Political Top Executives as Explanation of Policy Isomorphism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 573-599. Volden, C. (2006). States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 294-312. Walker, J. L. (1969). The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899. Walker,R. M., Avellaneda, C. & Berry, F. (2011). Exploring the Diffusion of Innovation Among High and Low Innovative Localities, Public Management Review, 13:1, 95-125. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press Ward, H. & John, P. (2013). Competitive Learning in Yardstick Competition: Testing Models of Policy Diffusion with Performance Data. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(1), 3-25. Yi, H., Berry, F. S.& Chen, W. (2018). Management Innovation and Policy Diffusion through Leadership Transfer Networks: An Agent Network Diffusion Model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 457-474. Yi, H.& Chen, W. (2019). Portable Innovation, Policy Wormholes, and Innovation Diffusion. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 737-748. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85885 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文以政策擴散之相關理論作為理論根基,探究於2019年年底至2021年5月期間,在警政署沒有給予任何誘因、要求與協助之情況下,仍有部分地方縣市警察局決定自主建置電子巡邏簽章(電子巡簽)系統的現象成因,並且特別關注縣市間的採用決策,是否與為何存在彼此相互連動與影響之關係。 在研究設計上,本文嘗試結合社會網絡之學說與分析技術,運用地理距離、跨縣市案件合作與警官人事調動等次級資料,建構與學習、仿效與競爭之政策擴散機制具有緊密理論關聯性的網絡連帶與結構變數,並使用對偶分析(Dyadic Analysis)驗證這些變數對於各縣市電子巡簽採用決策的影響。此外,本文更進一步藉由訪談資料強化各項網絡變數與特定擴散機制之連結,並就量化分析無法解釋的問題提供進一步的回應。 主要發現如下:(1) 網絡變數大幅提升分析模型的預測準確性,顯示存在明顯的擴散現象;(2) 各縣市在創新上的競爭意識與相對剝奪感,是電子巡簽系統最重要的擴散動力來源,其主要體現在先後採用系統之縣市在協力網絡中的高結構對等(structural equivalence)關係,以及異黨籍縣市首長間的政治競爭壓力;(3) 地理鄰近性仍是影響跨縣市觀摩學習便利性的重要擴散因素,合作頻率與人事往來等社會鄰近指標則不然;(4) 網絡中心領先縣市的政策採用行為,未引致所有邊陲縣市的仿效,前者的示範效果受到地理鄰近性所調節,蓋決策者傾向認定鄰近縣市的政策具備更高的複製可能性。 本文的研究價值在於跳脫我國政策擴散文獻對於「政策學習」的長期關注,闡述如何藉助社會網絡分析以區辨學習、仿效與競爭之不同擴散機制在擴散過程中的作用與相對重要性。上述成果亦可作為警政署未來推動地方警政創新的參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis studies the policy diffusion of the adoption of the electronic patrol signature systems by several local cities in Taiwan between late 2019 and May 2021. As those local police departments voluntarily adopted the new digital tools without receiving any requests, incentives, or assistance from the National Police Agency, it is worthwhile focusing on the interdependent relations of the adoption decisions among local city departments. As for the research design, this research tests policy diffusion theory and social network theories by collecting secondary data to construct a dataset of the policy diffusion for the electronic patrol signature systems. Measures include geographical distance, cross-jurisdiction case cooperation, and personnel transfer records to construct relational and structural network variables that have close theoretical linkages to the policy diffusion mechanisms of learning, imitation, and competition. The Dyadic Analysis is performed to test these variables' influence on each city's adoption decisions. Additionally, interview data were collected to reinforce the understanding of the relation between network measures and different diffusion mechanisms derived from the quantitative findings. Major findings are listed below: (1) Network measures greatly improve the predictability of the analytical models, suggesting a strong link between network relations and policy diffusion. (2) The sense of competition and relative deprivation between cities are the main driving forces in the diffusion process of the system. City departments with high structural equivalence in the collaborative network and with political competition between mayors from different parties are more likely to follow adoptions. (3) Geographical proximity is still an important factor that affects the convenience of observation and learning across cities, while social proximity indicators, such as collaboration frequency and personnel exchanges, are not significant factors. (4) The adoption decisions of leading cities in the center of the network don't have a direct effect on all the marginal cities. The former's demonstration effect is moderated by geographical proximity because decision-makers tend to assume the policy of a nearby jurisdiction has a higher duplicability in their own jurisdiction. The contribution of this article is that it moves from the traditional accentuation of the local policy diffusion research community on 'policy learning', but illustrates how to separate or discern the functions and relative importance of learning, imitation, and competition mechanisms in the diffusion process with the aid of social network analysis. The research could also serve as a reference for the National Police Department to promote policing innovations among local police departments in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:27:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2109202216073400.pdf: 3260801 bytes, checksum: 299e3bc5cd8c9f9c9761744614f3a090 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究問題與各章節安排 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 政策擴散之基本概念 7 第二節 政策的擴散機制 9 第三節 以網絡鑲嵌理論構築政策擴散之路徑 15 第三章 研究設計與架構 24 第一節 電子巡邏簽章之個案介紹 24 第二節 量化模型 34 第三節 質性方法之融合與設計 50 第四章 資料分析 53 第一節 量化分析結果 53 第二節 量化分析帶來的新疑問 69 第三節 質性資料之分析 70 第五章 研究結論與建議 85 第一節 研究發現與討論 85 第二節 政策建議:警政署在創新擴散中的角色定位 92 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 94 參考文獻 99 附件一:加入直線距離之政策趨同基準模型 112 附件二:各縣市在警政機關協力網絡中的中心性分數 113 圖目錄 圖1:本文之政策擴散概念結構 14 圖2:結構對等示意圖 22 圖3:各縣市路線規劃示意圖 41 圖4:我國地方警政機關之協力網絡 43 圖5:(a)交通距離ij與結構差異ij之調節作用;(b)交通距離ij之分布圖 64 圖6:最適模型統計顯著變數之預期趨同機率 65 表目錄 表 1:結合網絡鑲嵌概念之政策擴散自變數與假設架構 23 表2:各縣市針對電子巡羅簽章系統從事公開招標之時間點 30 表3:我國警政機關曾使用過之電子巡簽技術彙總 31 表4:對偶篩選與政策趨同之依變數設定 38 表5:各縣市治安分區劃分 39 表6:本文量化部份與主要研究設計之彙整 49 表7:受訪者列表 52 表8:訪談大綱 52 表9:政策趨同模型之變數描述性統計 53 表10:變數相關性矩陣 54 表11:分別加入擴散變數之政策趨同模型 57 表12:政策趨同模型的穩健性檢驗 60 表13:網絡擴散變數調節作用之檢驗 62 表14:模型18各變數之平均邊際效果 68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 警察巡邏勤務科技創新之政策趨同與擴散:結合社會網絡分析與質化途徑 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Policy Convergence and Diffusion of Police Patrol Technology Innovation: A Combination of Social Network Analysis and Qualitative Approaches | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳齊殷(Chyi-In Wu),王俊元(Chun-Yuan Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 巡邏勤務,政策創新,政策擴散,對偶分析,社會網絡分析,混合研究法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | patrol duty,policy innovation,policy diffusion,dyadic analysis,social network analysis,mixed-methods research, | en |
dc.relation.page | 113 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203742 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-27 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2109202216073400.pdf | 3.18 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。