請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85776完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉浩(Hao Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Han Yen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 嚴博瀚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:24:01Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-05-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 漢娜．鄂蘭的著作： 《共和危機》，1996，蔡佩君譯，台北：時報文化。 《馬克思與西方政治思想傳統》，2006，孫傳釗譯，南京：江蘇人民出版社。 《黑暗時代群像》，2006，鄧伯宸譯，台北：立緒文化。 《心智生命》，2007，蘇友貞譯，台北：立緒文化。 《責任與判斷》，2008，蔡佩君譯，台北：左岸文化。 《人的境況》，2009，王寅麗 譯，上海：上海人民出版社。 《政治的承諾》，2010，蔡佩君譯，台北：左岸文化。 《過去與未來之間》，2011，王寅麗 張立立譯，南京：譯林出版。 《康德政治哲學講稿》，2013，曹明 蘇婉兒譯，上海：上海人民出版社。 《平凡的邪惡：艾希曼耶路撒冷大審紀實》，2013，施奕如 譯，台北：玉山社。 The Human Condition. 1958. London: University of Chicago Press. Crisis of the Republic. 1972. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. The Life of the Mind: Thinking. 1977. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. 1982. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Philosophy and Politics. 1990. In Social Research, Vol.57(no.1): 73-103. Essays in Understanding: 1930-1954. 1994. ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Men in Dark Times. 1995. San Diego; New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Responsibility and Judgement. 2003. New York: Schocken Books. The Promise of Politics. 2005. ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Schocken Books. Between Past and Future. 2006. New York: Penguin Books. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. 2006. New York: Penguin Books. 貳、 中文部分 Anders, Gunther著，范捷平譯，2010，《過時的人：論第二次工業革命時期人的靈魂》，上海：上海譯文出版社。譯自Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. München: C.H. Beck. 2002. Benjamin, Walter著，Hannah Arendt編，張旭東、王斑譯，2012，《啟迪：本雅明文選》，香港：牛津大學出版社。譯自Illustrations: Essays and Reflections. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China). 1998 Kant, Immanuel著，何兆武譯，2012，《論優美感和崇高感》，北京：商務印書館。譯自Kants Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. von der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd II, S. 205-256. Kant, Immanuel著，鄧曉芒譯，2020，《判斷力批判》，新北市：聯經出版。譯自Kritik der Urteilskraft, in Philosophische Bibliothek, Band 39a. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. 1974. 沈青松，2019，《形上學：存有、人性與終極真實之探究》，臺北：國立臺灣大學出版中心。 陳朝政、曾志隆，2012，〈論穆芙對審議式民主的批判〉，《東吳政治學報》，30(1)：81-134。 童涵浦，2001，《從意識形態批判有效性的建立：Hannah Arendt 論「判斷」的政治意義》，臺北：國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 葉浩，2020，〈社群共感、政治共時性，以及鄂蘭的政治本體論：從時間向度重新詮釋共和主義的一種嘗試〉，《民主與現代性的政治反思：蔡英文教授紀念研討會論文集》，157-188。 蔡英文，2002，《政治實踐與公共空間：漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想》，臺北：聯經。 蕭高彥，2013，《西方共和主義思想史論》，臺北：聯經。 參、 西文部分 Abensour, Miguel. 2007. “Against the Sovereignty of Philosophy over Politics: Arendt’s Reading of Plato’s Cave Allegory.” Social Research, vol.74(no.4): 955-982. Bernstein, Richard. 1986. “Judging- the Actor and the Spectator.” in Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode. Cambridge: Polity Press. Beiner, Ronald. 1980. “Judging in a World of Appearances: A Commentary on Hannah Arendt's Unwritten Finale.” History of Political Thought, vol.1(no.1): 117-135. Beiner, Ronald. 1982. “Hannah Arendt on Judging.” in Lectures on Kant’s Political Thought, ed. Ronald Beiner. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Beiner, Ronald. 2008. “Rereading ‘Truth and Politics’.” Philosophy Social Criticism, vol.34(no. 1-2): 123-136. Benhabib, Seyla. 2003. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Borren, Marieke. 2013. “A Sense of the World: Hannah Arendt’s Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Common Sense.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol.21(no.2): 225-255. Canovan, Margaret. 1983. “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics.” The Journal of Politics, vol. 45(no.2): 286-302. Canovan, Margaret. 1990. “Socrates or Heidegger? Hannah Arendt’s Reflections on Philosophy and Politcs.” Social Research, vol.57(no.1): 135-166. Canovan, Margaret. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge, England; New York, NY ,USA: Cambridge University Press. Cavarero, Adriana. 2005. For More Than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Denneny, Michael. 1979. “The Privilege of Ourselves: Hannah Arendt on Judgement.” in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, ed. Melvyn A. Hill. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 245-274. Deveaux, Monique. 1999. “Agonism and Pluralism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 25(no.2): 1-22. Flathman, Richard E. 2005. Pluralism and Liberal Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Honig, Bonnie. 1988. “Arendt, Identity, and Difference.” Political Theory, vol. 16(no.1): 77-98. Honig, Bonnie. 1993. “The Politics of Agonism: A Critical Response to ‘Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche and Aestheticization of Political Aciton’ by Dana R. Villa.” Political Theory, vol. 21(no.3): 528-533. Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. New York: Cornell University Press. Jacobitti, Suzanne. 1988. “Hannah Arendt and the Will.” Political Theory, vol. 16(no. 1): 53-76. Jaspers, Karl. 1953. The Origin and Goal of History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Kateb, George. 1994. “Arendt and Individualism.” Social Research, vol. 61(no.4): 765-794. Kattago, Siobhan. 2010. “Memory, Pluralism and the Agony of Politics.” Journal of Baltic Studies, vol.41(no. 3): 383-394 Kattago, Siobhan. 2014. “Hannah Arendt on the World.” in Hannah Arendt: Key Concepts, ed. Patrick Hayden. London and New York: Routledge, 52-65. Lloyd, Margie. 1995. “In Tocqueville’s Shadow: Hannah Arendt’s Liberal Republicanism.” The Review of Politics, vol. 57(no.1): 31-58. Loidolt, Sophie. 2015. “Hannah Arendt’s Conception of Actualized Plurality.” In Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We’, ed. Thomas Szanto, Dermot Moran. New York: Routledge, 42-55. Loidolt, Sophie. 2018. Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity. New York: Routledge. Parekh, Bhikhu C. 1981. Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy. London: Macmillan. P. Hinchman, Lewis and K. Hinchman, Sandra. 1984. “In Heidegger’s Shadow: Hannah Arendt’s Phenomenological Humanism.” The Review of Politics, vol.46(no.2): 183-211. Rescher, Nicholas. 1987. “Aporetic Method in Philosophy.” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 41(no.2): 283-297. Villa, Dana. 1992. “Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of Political Action.” Political Theory, vol. 20(no.2): 274-308. Villa, Dana. 1996. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Villa, Dana. 1998. “The Philosopher Versus the Citizen: Arendt, Strauss, and Socrates.” Political Theory, vol.26(no.2): 147-172. Villa, Dana. 2007. “Arendt, Heidegger, and the Tradition.” Social Research, vol.74(no.4): 983-1003. Zerilli, Linda. 2012. “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgement: Farewell to Public Reason.” Political Theory, vol. 40(no.1): 6-31. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85776 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 漢娜鄂蘭的複數性概念，是一個在她的著作與論述中反覆出現卻從未被她詳細闡述的概念，而這也是各種詮釋途徑的差異所在，也就是她的詮釋者們確實各自針對了鄂蘭著述中豐富的元素與主題加以探究，卻忽視了複數性作為一個根本公約數的重要性。 本文主張應該將複數性視為鄂蘭的政治本體論的切入點，並認為應注意的是鄂蘭在闡述她不同的理論主題時，如行動、思考、判斷、真理等等，與複數性之間的關聯何在，並且複數性並非僅只作為一種基礎存有上的意義，更需經過行動的實現意義才能被完整。 對於複數性的處理，本文將從三個部分來開展，首先是鄂蘭從哪一個端點思考複數性，這部分的主要關懷是鄂蘭認為應該對政治與哲學嚴格區分的主張；其次是複數性的意義與輪廓，這部分處理的是她在《人的境況》之中關於政治的本質與積極生活內涵的系統性論述；最後是複數性的現實化，這部分要處理的是看似存於內省的心靈活動如何能夠成為複數性在實踐層次上的意義。在結論的部分，在重述與整理主要論點之外，將會簡要地觸及鄂蘭對於自由與時間兩個重要的論題的理解，試圖再更加延伸對於複數性的思索。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The plurality, which Hannah Arendt presents repeatedly in her works, yet never been elaborated in detail. Since Arendt’s implicit definition of plurality, it makes later scholars hard to find a common ground when studying Arendt. Different interpretative approach may find different dimensions to support their argumentations from her diverse works. The research argues that the plurality may be the hub of Arendt’s political thought. The research suggests that we have better consider plurality as a key concept of Arendt’s political ontology. What we could notice is how Arendt use plurality and how she connects plurality with other concepts when she expounds different topics such as action, thinking, judgement or truth. Furthermore, plurality should not be conceived only in a sense of fundamental ontology but also needs to be actualized through action to be fully recognized. The research will expand in three sections. In the first section, on what position Arendt ponders the concept of plurality, this part will focus on Arendt’s proposition of strictly distinguishing between politics and philosophy. Secondly, the meaning and figure of plurality, this section will explore the essence of politics and the connotation of ‘vita activa’ in her most well-organized book, The Human Condition. Moreover, the actualization of plurality, this part will discuss how the activity of mind which, though seemed a meditation activity, actually can make plurality into a more pragmatic meaning. In conclusion, based on restating and organizing basic arguments of this thesis, I will briefly mention two important issues discussed by Arendt, freedom and time, trying to extend the thinking about plurality. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:24:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2403202200115000.pdf: 4513192 bytes, checksum: 2af6dcbfa12dd8874f1133c90b08b676 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 前言…………………………………………………………………1 第二節 問題意識、文獻回顧與本文論旨…………………………………7 第三節 章節安排……………………………………………………………14 第二章 何謂政治？從何謂真理談起……………………………………………17 第一節 柏拉圖的哲學改造工程……………………………………………18 壹、 智慧・真理・善…………………………………………………19 貳、 意見・對話・友誼………………………………………………20 參、 洞穴寓言…………………………………………………………22 第二節 哪一種真理？………………………………………………………23 壹、 理性真理與事實真理……………………………………………24 貳、 真理的有效性………………………………………………………27 參、 無效的真理與謊言…………………………………………………29 第三節 小結…………………………………………………………………31 第三章 複數性與人類活動的本質………………………………………………35 第一節 複數性作為公共領域與世界之基礎………………………………36 壹、 功能化了的政治領域………………………………………………36 貳、 公共領域的顯像本質………………………………………………39 第二節 勞動與製作，及其無世界性與無意義性的循環…………………42 壹、 勞動與循環的無世界性……………………………………………43 貳、 製作與手段－目的中的無意義性…………………………………45 第三節 複數性與行動………………………………………………………48 壹、 身份與彰顯…………………………………………………………49 貳、 顯像・權力・網絡…………………………………………………51 參、 維繫世界的方式……………………………………………………54 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………56 第四章 朝向實現的思考與判斷…………………………………………………61 第一節 複數性與思考範型…………………………………………………62 壹、 從康德到艾希曼…………………………………………………62 貳、 思考的範型………………………………………………………65 參、 複數性作為思考的原貌…………………………………………68 肆、 思考能夠成為行動嗎？…………………………………………70 第二節 判斷力與複數性…………………………………………………72 壹、 解讀《判斷力批判》的一些前提………………………………74 貳、 社會之中的他者…………………………………………………77 參、 審美判斷…………………………………………………………79 肆、 從共感到共體感…………………………………………………82 第三節 小結………………………………………………………………85 第五章 結論………………………………………………………………………89 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………101 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 判斷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 思考 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 複數性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 漢娜鄂蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 本體論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | thinking | en |
| dc.subject | judgement | en |
| dc.subject | ontology | en |
| dc.subject | Hannah Arendt | en |
| dc.subject | action | en |
| dc.subject | plurality | en |
| dc.title | 漢娜鄂蘭的政治本體論：一個複數性概念的重新詮釋 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Political Ontology of Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation through the Concept of Plurality | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳嘉銘(Chia-Ming Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳豐維(Feng-Wei Wu),劉佳昊(Jia-Hau Liu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 複數性,行動,思考,判斷,漢娜鄂蘭,本體論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | plurality,action,thinking,judgement,Hannah Arendt,ontology, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 105 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200659 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-05-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2403202200115000.pdf | 4.41 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。