Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85754
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳虹如(Hung-Ju Chen)
dc.contributor.authorMing-Ju Hsiehen
dc.contributor.author謝明儒zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:23:22Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-05-20
dc.identifier.citationBakkeli, Nan Zou (2021). “Health, work, and contributing factors on life satisfaction: A study in Norway before and during the COVID-19 pandemic”. SSM-Population Health 14, 100804. Blanchflower, David G and Andrew J Oswald (2004). “Well-being over time in Britain and the USA”. Journal of public economics 88(7-8), 1359–1386. Carbonell, Ada Ferrer-i and John M Gowdy (2007). “Environmental degradation and happiness”. Ecological economics 60(3), 509–516. Chen, Wan-chi (2012). “How education enhances happiness: Comparison of mediating factors in four East Asian countries”. Social indicators research 106(1), 117–131. DeLeire, Thomas and Ariel Kalil (2010). “Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States”. International Review of Economics 57(2), 163–176. Di Tella, Rafael, Robert J MacCulloch, and Andrew J Oswald (2001). “Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness”. American economic review 91(1), 335–341. Easterlin, Richard A (1995). “Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 27(1), 35–47. Gerdtham, Ulf-G and Magnus Johannesson (2001). “The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: results based on Swedish microdata”. The Journal of Socio-Economics 30(6), 553–557. Helliwell, John F (2003). “How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being”. Economic modelling 20(2), 331–360. Layard, Richard (2006). “Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession”. The Economic Journal 116(510), C24–C33. Oishi, Shigehiro, Jesse Graham, Selin Kesebir, and Iolanda Costa Galinha (2013). 'Concepts of happiness across time and cultures”. Personality and social psychology bulletin 39(5), 559–577. Orden, Susan R and Norman M Bradburn (1968). “Dimensions of marriage happiness”. American Journal of Sociology 73(6), 715–731. Steptoe, Andrew (2019). “Happiness and health”. Annual review of public health 40, 339–359. Tsou, Meng-Wen and Jin-Tan Liu (2001). “Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan”. Journal of Happiness Studies 2(3), 269–288. Welsch, Heinz (2007). “Macroeconomics and life satisfaction: Revisiting the “Misery Index””. Journal of Applied economics 10(2), 237–251. Xiao, Jing Jian, Chengyang Yan, Piotr Bialowolski, and Nilton Porto (2021). “Consumer debt holding, income and happiness: evidence from China”. International Journal of Bank Marketing 39(5), 789–809. 傅仰止 (2021). 台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫 2019 第七期第五次:社會不平等組(C00351_1)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00351_1-2. 朱信翰 (2010). “幸福程度之影響因子分析:以台灣地區為例。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文,台北市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s76ua6”. 黃有光 (1999). “金錢能買快樂嗎?-為何應該增加公共支出?”. 經濟論文叢刊 27(3), 269–284.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85754-
dc.description.abstract「快樂」是一種主觀感受,可能來自於生活中的好事發生,或是也有好運降臨帶來的感覺。基於文明社會帶來的社會衝擊,所影響我們的情緒問題,本文欲透過問卷調查之數據,使用排序性常態機率模型(ordered probit model)實證,以達成以下三大目的:首先探討影響台灣人民的快樂之因素,以增進人民福祉;第二,因過去台灣文獻中並沒有針對價值觀部分作為被解釋變數來實證,因此本文一併拿來作為被解釋變數,考慮是否主觀變數的影響因素是否類似,為進一步探討之重點;第三,過去在台灣的快樂探討文獻較少,企盼本文對於台灣的研究有新的貢獻,也和過去的Tsou and Liu (2001)做對照。 實證結果發現:年齡對快樂的影響呈現U-shape函數,若是一個人為已婚女性、有高中學歷,無工作之但收入會比較高機率感到快樂。而健康狀況、個人習慣、工作狀況等對快樂的影響則是不顯著。在不同主觀之被解釋變數的延伸結果下,發現所得分配之判斷並不會被個人特質所影響,與快樂之結果大相逕庭,而家庭支出狀況則是在大學學歷以上為正相關,與快樂指數不同,而工作時數與抽菸習慣都有負向影響,影響家庭支出狀況選擇結果。可以看出雖然都是主觀價值觀變數,但影響之變數情形是不相同的。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract'Happiness' is a subjective feeling, which may come from the occurrence of good things in life or the feeling of good luck. Based on the social impact of civilization and the emotional problems that affect us, this paper aims to use the ordered probit model to verify the data from the questionnaire survey to achieve the following three objectives: First, to explore the factors that affect the happiness of Taiwanese people to enhance their well-being. Second, since there is no empirical support for the value component as the explained variable in previous Taiwanese literature, this paper adopts it as the explained variable and investigates whether the influencing elements of the subjective variables are comparable. Thirdly, there is very little research on the study of happiness in Taiwan, and I hope that this paper will provide a new contribution to the study of Taiwan, as well as a comparison to the previous literature. The empirical findings indicate that age has a U-shaped function on happiness. A married woman with a high school degree who is unemployed is more likely to be happy. The effect of health, personal habits, and employment level on happiness is insignificant. According to the extended results of various subjective explanatory variables, the judgement of income distribution was unaffected by individual characteristics and differed significantly from the happiness results, whereas household expenditure status was positively correlated with college education and above, in contrast to the happiness index, and working hours and smoking habits had a negative effect on the selection of household expenditure status. Even though they are both subjective value variables, it can be observed that the causes that influence them are different.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:23:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2005202202111500.pdf: 5851334 bytes, checksum: 5ed0e31884d1a3287bb47b5f56d80eb9 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 資料與變數 6 2.1 資料來源 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 變數定義與說明 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3 樣本敘述性統計 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 第三章 主要估計方法與實證結果 20 3.1 研究方法與結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.2 延伸討論與建議 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 第四章 結論 27 參考文獻 29
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject快樂zh_TW
dc.subject價值觀zh_TW
dc.subject個人特質zh_TW
dc.subject滿意度zh_TW
dc.subject幸福感zh_TW
dc.subjectindividual characteristicsen
dc.subjecthappinessen
dc.subjectwellnessen
dc.subjectdomain satisfactionen
dc.subjectvaluesen
dc.title以台灣資料探討快樂因素zh_TW
dc.titleThe Discussion of Happiness Factors: Evidence From Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳儀(I Chen),朱建達(Jian-Da Zhu)
dc.subject.keyword快樂,幸福感,滿意度,價值觀,個人特質,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordhappiness,wellness,domain satisfaction,values,individual characteristics,en
dc.relation.page30
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200784
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-05-20
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept經濟學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-07-05-
顯示於系所單位:經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2005202202111500.pdf5.71 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved