Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85674
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor梁朝雲(Chao-yun Liang)
dc.contributor.authorChia-Wei Wangen
dc.contributor.author王嘉偉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:21:12Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-10-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-21
dc.identifier.citation中文參考書目 王若馨、黃郁青、夏媺婷、李怡芳(2007)。研究方法的基礎(Matthew David, Carole D. Sutton原作)。臺北:韋伯。 中央社(2020.06.08)。只差1份文件!臺灣豬重返國際。檢自https://buzzorange.com/2020/06/08/taiwan-pigs-come-back/。 中華民國養豬協會(2010)。養豬產業政策。檢自http://swineroc.com.tw/Industrial/Industrial.aspx。 史瑞暘、徐永億、李世昌(2016)。商店印象與購買意願影響之研究:以烘焙產品為例。農業暨休閒產業研究,6(1),1-15。 古源光、廖遠東、劉展冏(2009)。農產品產銷履歷制度。科學發展,441,42-47。 行政院農委會(2019)。糧食供需年報108年。檢自https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx。 行政院農委會(2021)。美豬美牛進口議題專區。檢自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2511296。 呂秀英(2010)。影響傳統市場消費者購買黑豬肉之因素分析與相關性檢定。臺灣銀行季刊,61(3),137-159。 呂佩佩、丁興祥、陳美伶、唐婉如(2005)。學術洪流中護理研究的定位:從質性研究與量化研究之源流談起。護理雜誌,52(6),76-81。 李長群、陳玫瑾(2017)。農產品生產追溯系統對購買意願之影響。觀光與休閒管理,5(2),128-138。 余泰魁、吳桂森、楊淑斐(2003)。線上學習市場行銷組合驗證性因素分析之研究。中華管理評論國際學報,6(4),50-65。 宋華聰(2000)。因應加入WTO我國動物疫病防疫檢疫工作之策略。農政與農情,97,檢自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2395。 宋曜廷(2011)。調查研究法在數位學習的應用。宋曜廷主編,數位學習研究方法(頁73-108)。臺北:高等教育出版。 林仁豪(2014)。以ZARA為例探討企業行銷策略與核心競爭力分析。絲織園地,88,53-61。 林素吟(2007)。影響消費者購買意願的外部線索策略之研究。行銷評論,4(1),103-216。 林惠玲、陳正倉(2009)。統計學:方法與應用(四版)(pp. 391-393)。臺北:雙葉。 邱光輝、孫珮珊、陳明怡(2005)。知覺產品品質、顧客滿意與顧客忠誠關係之研究:以上海地區東南汽車為例。行銷評論,2(2),219-238。 周榮華(2003)。臺灣養豬現況與收益分析。農政與農情,128,檢自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=4352。 胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。 徐榮彬(引自中央社,2020)。揮別口蹄疫。檢自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202006160348.aspx。 黃美華、黃鵬飛、魏嘉慧(2015)。企業綠色行銷對消費者態度、企業形象認知與購買意願之影響。行銷評論,12(4),431-454。 黃秋霞 (2016)。 淺談量化與質性研究的反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(9),149-154。 黃素玫(2012)。西點烘焙業的知覺品質對消費者購買意願之影響。臺北城市大學學報,35,195-208。 黃靖嵐、郭永興(2015)。日本對美貿易戰略與農業政策調整:以豬肉產業為例。遠景基金會季刊,16(4),115-164。 陳秀惠、王淑美、梁朝雲(2021)。遊客對生態旅遊認知的評估與其願付價格之關聯研究。國家公園學報,31(1),9-22。 陳冠仰、陳柏元、戴有德、巫立宇(2016)。知覺品質、知覺價值與行為意圖關係之研究:交易成本觀點。臺大管理論叢,27(1),191-224。 陳俐伶(2015)。試析我國在口蹄疫影響下以SPS協定第6條「區域性條件之適應」解決我國豬肉產品出口之問題。經貿法訊,184,18-27。 陳韻竹(2014)。試析美日TPP豬肉市場准入議題談判達成共識之可能性。經貿法訊,167,7-12。 葉哲愷、梁朝雲、林玉偉(2020)。產品屬性與購買動機對水產品消費意願的影響。農民組織學刊,22,111-136。 曾柏興、徐敦玲(2018)。綠色港口行銷組合因素之探討。航運季刊,27(2),21-46。 曾庭筠、梁朝雲(2021)。原鄉部落茶葉品牌形象與行銷組合對購買意願與文化認同之影響。農民組織學刊,23,1-38。 董時叡、廖苑君、蔡嫦娟(2016)。消費者對在地有機農產品願付溢價之研究。農業推廣文彙,61,129-139。 農傳媒(2021)。日本2019年綜合糧食自給率統計 豬肉睽違6年首度上漲。檢自:https://www.agriharvest.tw/archives/51237 廖珮妏(2015)。從量化與質性研究信效度探討社會科學領域的研究品質。中華科技大學學報,62,69-88。 劉志偉(2009)。國際農糧體制與臺灣的糧食依賴:戰後臺灣養豬業的歷史考察。農政與農情,16(2),105-160。 劉添仁、鄧意滿、徐薇婷(2012)。國人對於國產豬肉消費行為與影響因素之研究。臺北城市大學學報,35,263-282。 蔡靜瑩(2007)。毛豬價格變動因素及穩定價格策略分析。農政與農情,181。檢自:https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=12994&print=Y 鄭閔聲(2019)。將「國產」與高檔畫等號 日本靠三招翻轉食肉文化。今周刊,1170。檢自:https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80393/post/201905220020/%E5%B0%87%E3%80%8C%E5%9C%8B%E7%94%A2%E3%80%8D%E8%88%87%E9%AB%98%E6%AA%94%E7%95%AB%E7%AD%89%E8%99%9F%20%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E9%9D%A0%E4%B8%89%E6%8B%9B%E7%BF%BB%E8%BD%89%E9%A3%9F%E8%82%89%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96 鄭惠如、梁朝雲(2020)。消費者倫理與豬肉產銷履歷衍生之信任感和知覺品質對消費意願與願付價格之影響。台灣農學會報,21(2),91-117。 釋知賢(沈昭吟)、邱聖真(2011)。行銷組合策略與品牌聯想對購買意願之影響關係:以傢俱業為例。經營管理論叢,7(2),1-12。 羅玲玲、楊弘任、楊璻菁、林觀靖(2005)。大都會地區消費者肉類購買及消費行為之分析。中華農學會報,6(2),129-141。 蘇雅琴、梁朝雲、王淑美(2020)。甘藷消費者之產品知識、知覺價值與消費者倫理對其購買意願的影響。傳播與發展學報,35,69-88。 LIVE JAPAN(2021)。愛吃豬肉的老饕必看!日本國產豬基本知識&推薦必吃日本品牌豬10選。檢自:https://travel.yahoo.com.tw/%E6%84%9B%E5%90%83%E8%B1%AC%E8%82%89%E7%9A%84%E8%80%81%E9%A5%95%E5%BF%85%E7%9C%8B-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%9C%8B%E7%94%A2%E8%B1%AC%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E7%9F%A5%E8%AD%98-%E6%8E%A8%E8%96%A6%E5%BF%85%E5%90%83%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E8%B1%AC10%E9%81%B8-053000643.html   外文參考書目 Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brand. New York, NY: Free Press. Abdurrahaman, D. T., Owusu, A., Soladoye, B. A., & Kalimuthu, K. R. (2018). Celebrity-brand endorsement: A study on its impacts on generation y-ers in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 11(3), 415-427. American Marketing Association (2021). Definition of marketing. Retrieved from: https://www.ama.org/listings/2013/01/17/definition-of-marketing/ Bagozzi, R. P., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37(6), 913-929. Bellhouse, A., Malcolm, B., Griffith, G. R., & Dunshea, F. (2010). Australian consumers’ willingness to pay and willingness to purchase a hypothetical lower cholesterol pork product. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18, 161-192. Beriain, M. J., Sánchez, M., & Carr, T. R. (2009). A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios. Journal of Animal Science, 87(10), 3392-3402. Bjørner, T. B., Hansen, L. G., & Russell, C. S. (2004). Environmental labeling and consumers choice: An empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordie Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3), 411-434. Booms, B., & Bitner, M. J. (1981). Marketing strategies and organizational structures for service firms. In Donnelly, J. H., & W. R. George (Eds.), Marketing of services (pp. 47-51). Chicago: American Marketing Association. Chen, H. J. (2018). What drives consumers’ mobile shopping? 4Ps or shopping preferences? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(4), 797-815. Congguo, M., Deshen, Z., Lianghai, C., & Lan, Y. (2010). The research of tracking and traceability system on pork quality. 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (pp. 926-929). Changsha, China. Cronin, J., Brady, M., & Hult, G. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2. Damico, A. B., Aulicino, J. M., & Di Pasquale, J. (2020). Perceptions and preconceptions about chicken and pork meat: A qualitative exploratory study of argentine consumers in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires. Sustainability, 12, article 2769. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior (8th ed.). Chicago, Il: Dryden Press. Fisk, R., Brown, S. W., & Bitner, M. J. (1993). Tracking the evolution of the services marketing literature. Journal of Retailing, 69(1), 61-103. Garvin, D. A. (1983). Quality on the line. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 65-75. Grunert, K. G., Bredahl, L., & Brunsø, K. (2004). Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector: A review. Meat Science, 66(2), 259-272. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00130-X Hasa, N., Limyothin, P., Jankingthong, W., & Wangbenmad, C. (2019). Marketing mix of Thai Halal food products instant in Indonesia. In Hassan, F., I. Osman, E. S. Kassim, B. Haris, & Hassan, R. (Eds.). Contemporary management and science issues in the Halal industry (pp. 111-120). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2677-6_10 Hemmerling, S., Hamm, U., & Spiller, A. (2015). Consumption behaviour regarding organic food from a marketing perspective: A literature review. Organic Agriculture, 5(4), 277-313. Holbrook, M. B., & Corfmen, K. P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience: Phaedrus rides again. In Jacoby, J., & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality (pp. 31-57). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2005). Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 84-96. Jonker, T., Ito, H., & Fujishima, H. (2005). Food safety and quality standards in Japan: Compliance of suppliers from developing countries. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank. Kamath, R. (2018). Food traceability on blockchain: Walmart’s pork and mango pilots with IBM. The Journal of British Blockchain Association, 1(1), 1-12. Khuong, M. N., & Tram, V. N. B. (2015). The effects of emotional marketing on consumer product perception, brand awareness and purchase decision: A study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(5), 524-530. Kim, R. B. (2010). Value innovation in export marketing strategy: The case of a Canadian firm in Japan. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 16, 361-372. Knight, D. K., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Japanese consumers' need for uniqueness: Effects on brand perceptions and purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 270-280. doi: 10.1108/13612020710751428 Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kung, M.-L., Wang, J.-H., & Liang, C. (2021). Impact of purchase preference, perceived value, and marketing mix on purchase intention and willingness to pay for pork. Foods, 10(10), 2396. doi: 10.3390/foods10102396 Liebe, U., Preisendörfer, P., & Meyerhoff, J. (2010). To pay or not to pay: Competing theories to explain individuals’ willingness to pay for public environmental goods. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 106-130. Lim, K. H., Hu, W., Maynard, L. J., & Goddard, E. (2013). US consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for country of origin labeled beef steak and food safety enhancements. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, 61(1), 93-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01260.x Lubinga, M. H., Ngqangweni, S., Mazibuko, N., Balarane, A., & Nyhodo, B. (2017). How has consumer education influenced pork consumption in South Africa? Instrumental variable regression analysis. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(20), 551-561. Lusk, J. L. Tonsor, G. T. & Schulz, L. L. (2021). Beef and pork marketing margins and price spreads during COVID-19. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 4-23. Mann, A. (2014). ‘Rich people don’t know how to cook,’ says new report. 12 September 2014, The Huffington Post UK. McCarthy, E. J., (1981). Basic marketing: A managerial approach (9th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin. Mennecke, B. E., Townsend, A. M., Hayes, D. J., & Lonergan, S. M. (2007). A study of the factors that influence consumer attitudes toward beef products using the conjoint market analysis tool. Journal of Animal Science, 85(10), 2639-2659. Meyerhoff, J. (2006). Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: Can attitudes tell us more? Journal of Environmental Planning Management, 49(2), 209-226. Meyerson, B. (2021). Consumers – especially wealthy ones – are ready to pay higher prices as the economy reopens. Retrieved from: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/consumers-higher-prices-economy-reopens Miller, R. L. & Brewer, J. D. (2003). The A-Z of social research: A dictionary of key social science research concepts. London, England: SAGE Publications Mitra, D., & Golder, P. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science, 25(3), 230-247. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0175. Moeller, S. et al. (2010). Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature. Meat Science, 84(1), 14-22. Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. T. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. In Jacoby, J., & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality (pp. 209-232). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Monteleone, E., Spinelli, S., Dinnella, C., Endrizzi, I., Laureati, M., Pagliarini, E., … & Tesini, F. (2017). Exploring influences on food choice in a large population sample: The Italian Taste project. Food Quality and Preference, 59, 123-140. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.013 Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “intenders” actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405. Ndwandwe, S. B., & Weng, R.-C. (2017). Pork consumer preferences in Swaziland. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 6(8), 545-560. Ngapo, T. M., Dransfield, E., Martin, J. F., Magnusson, M., Bredahl, L., & Nute, G. R. (2004). Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark. Meat Science, 66(1), 125-134. Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., & Dransfield, E. (2007). International preferences for pork appearance: I. Consumer choices. Food Quality and Preference, 18(1), 26-36. Ngarava, S., & Mushunje, A. (2019). Marketing mix strategy determinants in pork-based agri-businesses: Experiences from Zimbabwe. Acta Commercii, 19(2), Article a600. Nguyen-Viet, H. et al. (2019). Rapid integrated assessment of food safety and nutrition related to pork consumption of regular consumers and mothers with young children in Vietnam. Global Food Security, 20, 37-44. Oh, S.-H., & See, M. T. (2012). Pork preference for consumers in China, Japan and South Korea. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25(1), 143-150. Oh, S.-H., & Whitley, N. C. (2011). Pork production in China, Japan and South Korea. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(11), 1629-1636. Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retail setting. Journal of Retailing, 57, 25-48 Olshavsky, R. W. (1985). Perceived quality in consumer decision making: An integrated theoretical perspective. In Jacoby, J., & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality (pp. 3-29). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Outhwaite, W. & Turner, S. (2007). The SAGE handbook of social science methodology. London, England: SAGE Publications. Papanagiotou, P., Tzimitra-Kalogianni, I., & Melfou, K. (2013). Consumers’ expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat. Meat Science, 93(3), 449-454. Peng, Y., Adhiputra, K., Padayachee, A., Channon, H., Ha, M., & Warner, R. D. (2019). High oxygen modified atmosphere packaging negatively influences consumer acceptability traits of pork. Foods, 8(11), 567. Perry, R. H., Charlotte, B., Isabella, M., & Bob, C. (2014). SPSS explained (p. 231). London, England: Routledge. Peterson, H. H., Bernard, J. C., Fox, J. A., & Peterson, J. M. (2012). Japanese consumers’ valuation of rice and pork from domestic, U.S., and other origins. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(1), 93-106. Philcox, N. (2007). Literature review and framework analysis of non-market goods and services provided by British Columbia’s ocean and marine coastal resources (p. 15). Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection. Ryan, A. M., & Spash, C. L. (2011). Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 674-687. Saitarli, V. (2019). Emotion: The super weapon of marketing and advertising. Forbes, Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2019/11/04/emotion-the-super-weapon-of-marketing-and-advertising/?sh=4316223e4df0 Samudro, A., Sumarwan, U., Simanjuntak, M., & Yusuf, E. (2020). Assessing the effects of perceived quality and perceived value on customer satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 1077-1084. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.001. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer behavior (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International, Inc. Steenkamp, J. B. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309-333. Strak, J. (2016). Japan’s market for imported pork is large. Retrieved from: https://www.pigprogress.net/Finishers/Articles/2016/11/Japans-market-for-imported-pork-is-large-2909811W/ Susanti, V., Sumarwan, U., Simanjuntak, M., & Yusuf, E. Z. (2020). Rational antecedent framework of brand satisfaction in the industrial market: Assessing rational perceived quality and rational perceived value roles. International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, 10(1), 19-26. Thabit, T., & Raewf, M. (2018). The evaluation of marketing mix elements: A case study. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(4), 101-109. U.S. Meat Export Federation staff (2021). Japan, Southeast Asia and South Korea all present potential for export growth. Retrieved from: https://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/news/pork-production-asia-reveals-opportunities-export-growth Van Kempen, L. (2004). Are the poor willing to pay a premium for designer labels? A field experiment in Bolivia. Oxford Development Studies, 32(2), 205-224. Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd Ed.) (pp. 244-248). New York, NY: Norton. Vasylieva, N., & Harvey, J. (2020). Application of the marketing mix to the world export of animal products. Innovative Marketing, 16(1), 79-88. Wang, J., Ge, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Urban Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for pork with certified labels: A discrete choice experiment. Sustainability, 10(3), 603. doi: 10.3390/su10030603 Washburn, J. H., & Plank, R. E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(1), 46-62. doi: 10.1080/10696679.2002.11501909 Wongprawmas, R., & Canavari, M. (2017). Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for food safety labels in an emerging market: The case of fresh produce in Thailand. Food Policy, 69, 25-34. Wu, L., Gong, X., Qin, S., Chen, X., Zhu, D., Hu, W., & Li, Q. (2017). Consumer preferences for pork attributes related to traceability, information certification, and origin labeling: Based on China's Jiangsu Province. Agribusiness, 33(3), 424-442. Yin, S., Hu, W., Chen, Y., Han, F., Wang, Y., & Chen, M. (2019). Chinese consumer preferences for fresh produce: Interaction between food safety labels and brands. Agribusiness, 35(1), 53-68. doi: 10.1002/agr.21585 Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. Zeithaml, V. A., & Kirmani, A. (1993). Advertising, perceived quality, and brand image. In Aaker, D. A., & A. L. Biel. (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising: Advertising’s role in building strong brand (pp.143-161). Iowa, IA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85674-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在理解臺、日兩國消費者對豬肉知覺品質和行銷組合的感知,並分析知覺品質與行銷組合對豬肉購買意願及願付價格的影響。研究者透過網路和實體問卷向有購買豬肉經驗的消費者進行調查,在臺灣收集到526份份有效樣本,在日本收集到608份有效樣本。分析結果顯示:知覺品質可分為內在品質與外在品質;行銷組合可分為:實體設施、推廣、價格、通路和產品等五類行銷方式。 對於臺灣消費者來說,實體設施行銷、價格行銷、內在品質與外在品質是影響豬肉購買意願的四大正向因素。對日本消費者而言,價格行銷、推廣行銷,以及內在品質是影響其購買臺產豬肉意願的正向因素,而實體行銷和通路行銷會抑制日人購買臺產豬肉的意願。此外,對臺灣消費者而言,每月可彈性應用的平均金額與價格行銷是影響國產豬肉願付價格的正向因素,而推廣行銷和產品行銷會壓抑臺人購買國產豬肉的願付價格。對日本消費者而言,價格行銷、內在品質,以及通路行銷會影響臺產豬肉願付價格的正向因素,而產品行銷和外在品質會抑制日人購買臺產豬肉的願付價格。 本研究另發現:臺灣30歲以上消費者的豬肉購買意願較高,學生身分者購買意願偏低;另具有碩博士學位者和每月可支配金額達五萬以上的消費者,會願意支付較高的經費來購買豬肉產品。相對之下,日本男性比女性消費者更有意願購買臺產豬肉;30~49歲的民眾對於臺產豬肉的購買意願會高於30歲以下的民眾;同一年齡層對於臺產豬肉的願付價格也會高於50歲以上的消費者;另具碩博士學歷者和每月可支配金額偏高者,都會對臺產豬肉的願付價格也會較高。整體來說,臺灣消費者普遍都比日本消費者更偏好臺灣國產豬肉。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to understand the perceptual quality and marketing mix of pork products recognized by Taiwanese and Japanese consumers, and to analyze the impact of perceptual quality and marketing mix on pork purchase intention and willingness to pay. The researcher conducted a survey which targeted on consumers with experience in buying pork through the Internet and physical questionnaires. A total of 526 valid samples from Taiwan and 608 valid samples from Japan were collected for further statistical analysis. The results reveal that perceptual quality can be divided into internal quality and external quality; and marketing portfolio can be divided into five categories, namely physical facility, promotion, price, place, and product marketing. For Taiwanese sample, physical facility marketing, price marketing, internal quality and external quality are the four positive factors affecting pork purchase intention. For Japanese sample, price marketing, promotion marketing, and internal quality are the three positive factors affecting Taiwan-produced pork purchase intention, whereas physical facility marketing and place marketing are negative factors. In addition, for Taiwanese sample, monthly amount of flexible expense and price marketing are the positive factors influencing pork consumers’ willingness to pay. However, promotion marketing and product marketing could reduce their willingness to pay a premium. For Japanese sample, price marketing, internal quality, and place marketing are the positive factors influencing Taiwan-produced pork consumers’ willingness to pay, whereas product marketing and external quality could reduce their willingness to pay a premium. This study also found that Taiwanese consumers over 30 years of age are more intended to buy pork, while those with student status possess less intention to purchase pork. In addition, consumers who have a high educational level, and who monthly amount of flexible expense over 50,000 would be willing to pay more for pork products. By contrast, Japanese men are more willing to buy Taiwan-produced pork than female consumers. People aged 30-49 are more willing to buy Taiwan-produced pork than those under 30. The willingness to pay for Taiwan-produced pork in the same age group is also higher than that of consumers over 50 years old. Those with advanced degrees and those with a high monthly amount of flexible expense will also be willing to pay a higher price for Taiwan-produced pork. Overall, Taiwanese consumers generally prefer Taiwanese domestic pork than Japanese consumers.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:21:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1006202218563000.pdf: 4258217 bytes, checksum: 11800c60fd644601d7456181520fe1f1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定 i 謝誌 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 5 第四節 研究貢獻 6 第五節 操作型定義 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 臺灣與日本豬肉市場概述 9 第二節 豬肉之購買意願和願付價格 14 第三節 臺灣與日本豬肉之知覺品質 17 第四節 臺灣與日本豬肉之行銷組合 20 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 量化研究與問卷調查 23 第二節 研究架構與假設 26 第三節 問卷調查對象 27 第四節 研究工具 28 第五節 調查過程與分析方法 30 第四章 資料分析 31 第一節 敘述性統計 31 第二節 項目分析 34 第三節 因素分析 43 第四節 迴歸分析 58 第五節 差異分析 64 第六節 分析結果摘要 75 第五章 討論 77 第一節 臺灣與日本之豬肉消費比較 77 第二節 臺灣樣本之豬肉消費 79 一 豬肉知覺品質與行銷組合對購買意願的影響 79 二 豬肉知覺品質與行銷組合對願付價格的影響 80 三 不同消費者人口變項在豬肉購買意願和願付價格上的差異 81 第三節 日本樣本之豬肉消費 83 一 豬肉知覺品質與行銷組合對購買意願的影響 83 二 豬肉知覺品質與行銷組合對願付價格的影響 84 三 不同消費者人口變項在豬肉購買意願和願付價格上的差異 85 第六章 結論與建議 87 第一節 研究結論 87 第二節 實務建議 89 第三節 研究限制 90 第四節 未來研究 91 中文參考書目 93 外文參考書目 98 附錄一:中文版調查問卷 107 附錄二:日本版調查問卷 113 學術履歷 121
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject願付價格zh_TW
dc.subject日本zh_TW
dc.subject行銷組合zh_TW
dc.subject知覺品質zh_TW
dc.subject臺灣zh_TW
dc.subject豬肉zh_TW
dc.subject購買意願zh_TW
dc.subjectJapanen
dc.subjectwillingness to payen
dc.subjectconsumption intentionen
dc.subjectporken
dc.subjectTaiwanen
dc.subjectperceived qualityen
dc.subjectmarketing mixen
dc.title豬肉知覺品質與行銷組合對購買意願和願付價格的影響:臺灣與日本消費者的比較zh_TW
dc.titleInfluence of perceived quality and marketing mix on the consumption intention and willingness to pay for pork: A comparison study between Taiwanese and Japanese consumersen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee彭立沛(Li-Pei Peng),陳炤堅(Chao-Chien Chen)
dc.subject.keyword日本,行銷組合,知覺品質,臺灣,豬肉,購買意願,願付價格,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordJapan,marketing mix,perceived quality,Taiwan,pork,consumption intention,willingness to pay,en
dc.relation.page121
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200911
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-06-23
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-10-05-
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1006202218563000.pdf4.16 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved