Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85580
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor劉啟群(Chi-Chun Liu)
dc.contributor.authorKuan-Wei Taoen
dc.contributor.author陶冠瑋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:19:00Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-26
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-07-01
dc.identifier.citation1. Adams, R., Mehran, H. (2003). “Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies?” Economic Policy Review 9, 123–142. 2. Adams, R., Mehran, H. (2011). “Bank board structure and performance: evidence for large bank holding companies.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 21, 243–267. 3. Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management journal, 21(3), 479-486. 4. Andrea Beltratti, René M. Stulz. (2012). “The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better?”. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 105, Issue 1, July 2012, Pages 1-17. 5. Barnea A, Rubin A (2010) Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. J Bus Ethics 97:71–86. 6. Basu, S., Vitanza, J., Wang, W., & Zhu, X. R. (2022). “Walking the walk? bank esg disclosures and home mortgage lending. Bank ESG Disclosures and Home Mortgage Lending (February 21, 2022).” Fox School of Business Research Paper Forthcoming. 7. Berger, A., Udell, G. (2004). “The institutional memory hypothesis and the procyclicality of bank lending behavior”. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13, 458–495. 8. Bikker, J., Metzemakers, P. (2005). “Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality”. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 15, 141–157. 9. Bolton, B. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and bank performance.IMD Business School Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277912. 10. Bongiovanni, A., Reghezza, A., Santamaria, R., & Williams, J. (2021). Do negative interest rates affect bank risk-taking ?. Journal of Empirical Finance, 63, 350-364. 11. Booth, J.R., Cornett, M.M., Tehranian, H. (2002). “Boards of directors, ownerships, and regulation.” Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1973–1996. 12. Brunnermeier, Markus K., Gary Gorton & Arvind Krishnamurthy.(2012) “Risk Topography,” NBER Macro Annual 2011, 2012. 13. Coles, J.L., Naveen, D.D., Naveen, L. (2008). “Boards: does one size fit all.” Journal of Financial Economics 87, 329–356. 14. Dane M. Christensen, George Serafeim Anywhere Sikochi (2022). “Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings” THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW Vol. 97, No. 1 January 2022 ,pp. 147–175. 15. Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D., Laeven, L., 2008. Credit booms and lending standards:Evidence from the subprime mortgage market. 16. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2010). “Are banks too big to fail or too big to save? International evidence from equity prices and CDS spreads.” European Banking Center Discussion Paper, (2010-15). 17. Di Tommaso C, Thornton J. (2020).Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020;27: 2286–2298. 18. Drago, D., Carnevale, C., & Gallo, R. (2019). Do corporate social responsibility ratings effect credit default swap spreads? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 644–652. 19. Elyas Elyasiani, Ling Zhang (2015).” Bank holding company performance, risk, and ‘‘busy” board of directors”. Journal of Banking & Finance 60 (2015) 239–251. 20. Fahlenbrach, R., Prilmeier, R., & Stulz, R. M. (2018). “Why does fast loan growth predict poor performance for banks?.” The Review of Financial Studies, 31(3), 1014-1063. 21. Festić, M., Kavkler, A., Repina, S., 2011. The macroeconomic sources of systemic risk in the banking sectors of five new EU member states. Journal of Banking and Finance 35, 310-322 22. Fich, E.M., Shivdasani, A. (2006). “Are busy boards effective monitors?” Journal of Finance 61, 689–724. 23. Foos, D., Norden, L., & Weber, M. (2010). “Loan growth and riskiness of banks.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940. 24. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing. 25. Gangi, F., Meles, A., D'Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699. 26. Hess, K., Grimes, A., Holmes, M., 2009. Credit losses in Australasian banking.Economic Record 85, 331–343. 27. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13. 28. Kraft, E., Jankov, L., 2005. Does speed kill? Lending booms and their consequences in Croatia. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 105–121. 29. Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of financial economics, 93(2), 259-275. 30. Laeven, L., Majnoni, G. (2003). “Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: Too much, too late”. Journal of Financial Intermediation 12, 178–197. 31. Laeven, M. L., Ratnovski, M. L., & Tong, M. H. (2014). Bank size and systemic risk. International Monetary Fund. 32. Lang, W. W., & Jagtiani, J. A. (2010). “The mortgage and financial crises: The role of credit risk management and corporate governance.” Atlantic Economic Journal, 38(2), 123-144. 33. Oikonomou I, Brooks C, Pavelin S (2012) The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: a longitudinal analysis. Financ Manage 41:483–515. 34. Paul Calem,Rafael Rob.(1999).” The Impact of Capital-Based Regulation on Bank Risk-Taking”. Journal of Financial Intermediation Volume 8, Issue 4, October 1999, Pages 317-352. 35. Salas, V., Saurina, J. (2002). “Credit risk in two institutional regimes: Spanish commercial and savings banks”. Journal of Financial Services Research 22, 203–224. 36. Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). “Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe.” Journal of business economics, 86(8), 867-904. 37. Shen, C.-H., Wu, M.-W., Chen, T.-H., & Fang, H. (2016). To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from global banking sector. Economic Modelling, 55, 207–225. 38. Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101308252 39. Soana, M. G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 133–148. 40. Soedarmono, Wahyoe & Sitorus, Djauhari & Tarazi, Amine (2017). 'Abnormal loan growth, credit information sharing and systemic risk in Asian banks,' Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1208-1218. 41. Srivastav, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). “Corporate governance and bank risk-taking.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24,334–345.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85580-
dc.description.abstract本研究以2016年至2018年與2005年至2018年兩段期間之美國銀行控股公司(Bank Holding Company , BHCs)為樣本,利用其主要儲貸機構向美國聯準會申報之HMDA房屋抵押貸款資料及銀行監管資料庫中的銀行財務資料,並結合路孚特 (Refinitiv) ESG資料庫,探討ESG與高價抵押貸款對於銀行市場基礎風險的影響。根據實證結果,投入ESG整體活動與風險兩者之間,雖然係數並不顯著,但皆為負向關係,大致符合利害關係者理論,顯示銀行將ESG因素納入決策過程當中,某一程度上可以降低風險。其中,投入社會方面的ESG活動可以對於銀行的整體風險及獨特性風險具有統計上顯著的下降效果,然而由於係數太小,實際上能影響風險的程度有限;而銀行若投入環境方面的ESG活動,則會造成系統性風險的上升;投入治理方面的ESG活動則對於風險無影響。最後,銀行高價抵押貸款金額比例的上升,與整體風險及獨特性風險均為顯著正相關,且增額的解釋力強於ESG變數。代表銀行若是增加高價抵押貸款金額的比例,會導致銀行風險上升。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the impact of ESG factor and high-priced mortgage ratio on bank market-based risk. Using bank financial data of Bank Regulatory database and HMDA mortgage loan data, which Bank Holding Company (BHCs) reported to the Federal Reserve from 2016 to 2018 and 2005 to 2018 by their major savings and loan institutions, and Refinitiv ESG database as samples. According to the empirical results, although the coefficients between the overall ESG investment activities and bank risks are not significant, they are all negative, which is roughly in line with the stakeholder theory. It shows banks can reduce risks to a certain extent if ESG factors were considered in the decision-making process. First, investing in social aspects of ESG activities can have a statistically significant reduction effect on the total risk and idiosyncratic risk of the bank, since the coefficient is too small, it can only affect the risk to a limited extent. Secondly, if a bank invests in environmental aspects of ESG activities, it will lead to an increase in systemic risk. In addition, ESG activities invested in governance have no significant impact on bank risk. Finally, the increase in the ratio of high-priced mortgage loans is significant and is positively correlated with both total risk and idiosyncratic risk, which means if the bank increases the proportion of high-priced mortgage loans, it will lead to an increase in bank risk, and the increase R-squared of high-priced mortgage loans is stronger than that of ESG variables.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:19:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2906202213350600.pdf: 2483514 bytes, checksum: 8c580c292931c0dcc1fd9b3bdf6159f9 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目 錄 iv 圖 目 錄 v 表 目 錄 v 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 背景架構、文獻探討與假說發展 3 第一節 背景架構 3 第二節 文獻回顧 12 第三節 假說發展 18 第三章 樣本與研究設計 24 第一節 樣本與資料來源 24 第二節 實證模型 26 第四章 研究結果與分析 28 第一節 敘述性統計 28 第二節 實證結果 31 第五章 研究結論、限制 36 參考文獻 39 附錄 74 附錄一:變數定義 74 附錄二:額外補充之迴歸實證結果 76
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject高價抵押貸款比例zh_TW
dc.subject銀行風險zh_TW
dc.subjectESGzh_TW
dc.subject房屋抵押貸款揭露法案zh_TW
dc.subjectHMDA(Home Mortgage Disclosure Act)en
dc.subjectBank Market-based Risken
dc.subjectESGen
dc.subjectHigh-priced mortgage loan ratioen
dc.titleESG與高價抵押貸款比例對於銀行風險之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of ESG Factor and High-Priced Mortgage Loan Ratio on Bank Risken
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor尤琳蕙(Lin-Hui Yu)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張窈菱(Yao-Lin Chang),林純央(Chun-Yang Lin),吳思蓉(Szu-Jung Wu)
dc.subject.keyword銀行風險,ESG,高價抵押貸款比例,房屋抵押貸款揭露法案,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordBank Market-based Risk,ESG,High-priced mortgage loan ratio,HMDA(Home Mortgage Disclosure Act),en
dc.relation.page84
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201197
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-07-04
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-07-26-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2906202213350600.pdf2.43 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved