請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85526完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳政衛(Cheng-Wei Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Chun Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張喜鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:17:59Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2020年企業社會責任報告書(2020)。環球晶圓股份有限公司。 2020年企業社會責任報告書(2020)。中美矽晶製品股份有限公司。 日本臺商投資環境報告(2021)。台北駐日經濟文化代表處。 王孝君(2014)。半導體 IC 代工產品製程技術之碳足跡分析。交通大學工學院永續環境科技學程學位論文。 池祥麟(2019)。企業社會責任—行為財務學的觀點。證券市場發展季刊。第29卷4期,頁63-104。 吳易樺(2013)。日本碳稅制度介紹。工業技術研究院 綠能與環境研究所。 呂錫民(2013)。工業部門節能技術與潛力分析:以半導體產業為例。 冷凍空調與能源科技雜誌。79期,頁56 – 66。 李永正(2011)。韓國新世代 綠色成長策略。台灣經濟研究月刊。第34卷第5期,頁90-100。 林祥輝(2016)。日本再生能源特別措施(FIT)法修正案。工業技術研究院 綠能與環境研究所。 林茂文(2018)。推進碳排:油氣產業變革的挑戰。石油季刊,第54卷第3期,頁1-22。 林茂文(2020)。COVID-19 疫情對碳排展望之研析。石油季刊。第56卷第4期,頁1-30。 林茂文(2021)。推動增氣減煤碳排的關鍵與抉擇。石油季刊,第57卷第2期,頁1-33。 洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青(2007)。企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變。中山管理評論。第15卷第1期,頁11-35。 洪英修(2021)。2022半導體矽晶圓產業展望。第一金投顧。 能源轉型白皮書109年度執行報告(2020)。台灣經濟部能源局。 陳詠萱(2021)。以台積電與三星電子探究企業減碳策略。國立臺灣大學管理學院國際企業研究所。 許進發(2005)。台灣矽晶圓產業材料分析與競爭策略之研究。國立交通大學科技管理研究所。 莊朝榮(2011)。中國綠色成長策略之探討。台灣經濟研究月刊。第34卷第11期,頁96-100。 溫麗琪(2021)。國際碳邊境調整機制與國內碳定價風險因應。中華經濟研究院綠色經濟研究中心。 2021年サステナビリティ(2021)。信越ポリマーグループ 2050年カーボンニュートラルに伴う グリーン成長戦略(2021)。日本経済産業省。 TCFDを活用した経営戦略立案のススメ(2021)。日本環境省。 デジタル産業政策の新機軸(2021)。日本経済産業省。 ゼロエミッション東京戦略(2019)。東京都環境局。 サプライチェーン排出量の算定と削減に向けて(2022)。日本環境省。 エネルギーに関する年次報告(2019)。日本経済産業省 資源エネルギー庁。 エネルギーに関する年次報告(2020)。日本経済産業省 資源エネルギー庁。 エネルギー白書2022について(2022)。日本経済産業省。 令和3年版 環境・循環型社会・生物多様性白書(2020)。日本環境省。 半導体戦略(2021)。日本経済産業省。檢自: 半導体戦略の進捗と今後(2021)。日本経済産業省。 信越化学グループ CSR調達ガイドライン(2017)。信越化学工業株式会社。 信越化学グループのサステナビリティレポート(2021)。信越化学工業株式会社。 信越化学グループのSBT成果報告(2020)。日本環境省。 Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2015). Solar energy in sub-Saharan Africa: The challenges and opportunities of technological leapfrog- ging. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(1): 15–31. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Chen, X., Wang, X., Khan, Z., & Chen, J. (2019). Overcoming institutional voids as a pathway to becoming ambidextrous: The case of China’s Sichuan Tele- com. Long Range Planning, 52(4): 101871. Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. (2017). Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9): 1045–1064. Bellini, E. (2019). Offshore PV system goes online in North Sea. PV Magazine. https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/12/12/ offshore-pv-system-goes-online-in-north-sea/. Erin Bass, A. & Grøgaard, B., (2021). The Long-term Energy Transition: Drivers, Outcomes, and the role of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 52: 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00432-3 EnkvistT, P.-A. & Nauclér, T & Oppenheim, J.M. (2008). Business strategies for climate change. 24-33. Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1): 1–23. Flammer, C. & Toffel, M.W. & Viswanathan, K. (2021). Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks, 42: 1850-1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3313 Georgallis, P., Dowell, G., & Durand, R. (2019). Shine on me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(3): 503–541. GlobalWafers Co. Ltd CDP Report (2021). CDP Worldwide. Hallba ̈ck, J., & Gabrielsson, P. (2013). Entrepreneurial marketing strategies during the growth of international new ventures originating in small and open economies. International Business Review, 22(6): 1008–1020. IEEFA. 2019. Facebook makes first direct investment in renewable energy project. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. https://ieefa.org/facebook-makes-first-direct- investment-in-renewable-energy-project/. Kaenzig, J., Heinzle, S. L., & Wu ̈stenhagen, R. (2013). Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany. Energy Policy, 53: 311–322. Kelly-Detwiler, P. (2019). Solar technology will just keep getting better: Here’s why. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ peterdetwiler/2019/09/26/solar-technology-will-just-keep- getting-better-heres-why/?sh=40fbf16d7c6b. London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 350–370. Lee (2012). Corporate Carbon Strategy in Response to Climate Change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21: 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.711 Meyer, K. E. (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4): 259–276. Miller, C. A., Iles, A., & Jones, C. F. (2013). The social dimensions of energy transitions. Science as Culture, 22(2): 135–148. Nippa, M. & Patnaik, S. & Taussig, M. (2021). MNE responses to carbon pricing regulations: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 52: 904–929. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00403-8 Plumlee, M. & Brown, D. & M. Hayes, R. & Marshall, R.S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34: 336-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). CO2 Emissions. OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions. Ratinen, M., & Lund, P. (2015). Policy inclusiveness and niche development: Examples from wind energy and photovoltaics in Denmark, Germany, Finland, and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 136–145. Sovacool, B. K. (2016). How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 202–215. Sovacool, B. K., & Drupady, I. M. (2016). Energy access, poverty, and development: The governance of small-scale renewable energy in developing Asia. Abingdon: Routledge. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. CDP Report (2021). CDP Worldwide. Verbeke, A., Osiyevskyy, O., & Backman, C. A. (2017). Strategic responses to imposed innovation projects: The case of carbon capture and storage in the Alberta oil sands industry. Long Range Planning, 50(5): 684–698. Weinhofer, G. & Busch, T. (2012). Corporate Strategies for Managing Climate Risks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22: 121-144.https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1744 Yuan,W. & Bao, Y. & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR Initiatives in Business: An Organizing Framework. Journal of Business Ethics volume, 101: 75–92. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85526 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來全球氣候變遷引發極端天氣事件,導致人類死傷無數,也蒙受巨大經濟損失。即使國際上的減碳協議持續不斷,但是全球碳排量不減反增,由此可知全球需要更有效與更有影響力的減碳策略來解決氣候變遷問題,並兼顧環境、經濟與社會的各項發展。隨著半導體製程與科技進步,產品規格不斷微縮,使得生產設備所需能源量預計將大幅上升。因此,半導體產業不僅要擁有創新思維,投入新技術研發更高效能的產品,更必須協同整體半導體供應鏈全面參與減碳計畫,全球才能邁向淨零排放的目標。 本研究欲探討半導體上游的矽晶圓製造廠環球晶與信越的減碳行動,探討其內部資源如何部署於減碳活動,並進行外部環境分析如何與企業相互影響,達到永續經營目的。研究結果顯示,環球晶因台灣社會及法規較國際緩慢,產業地位又稍落於信越,因而致力於訂定明確減碳與再生能源目標,並由內組織參與落實碳排目標,再向外改善產業鏈,其減碳策略為全方位增強者。相對而言,信越集團因日本社會及法規都為國際領導者,因而運用自身產業優勢跟隨日本社會進程,在第三代半導體的新市場和其他產業發展皆為龍頭,在其他減碳活動上的得分也相對高,仍投入大量資源在優化現有業務或改善現有製程,屬於由外而內推進減碳行動,其減碳策略為全方位探索者。 本研究分析全球環境、台日社會與法規對矽晶圓產業產生的碳排壓力,並分析矽晶圓產業的壓力來源,最後探討環球晶與信越內部資源部署,提供未來相關產業評估碳排計劃之參考。由於個案的碳排計劃,短期無法明確呈現對企業的營運與財務的影響,未來研究方向可納入碳排成本與財務分析,比較不同減碳策略對企業的營運影響及減碳有效性與達成率。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, global climate change has triggered extreme weather, resulting in countless casualties and huge economic losses. Even though the international carbon reduction agreement continues, the global carbon emissions is still increasing. For that reason, we need more effective and influential strategies to solve the problem of climate change, and consider the various environmental, economic and social issues. With the advancement of semiconductor process and technology, product specifications continue to shrink, and the energy consumption for equipment is expected to increase significantly. Therefore, the semiconductor industry must not only have innovative thinking and invest in new technologies to develop higher-efficiency products, but also must cooperate with the entire semiconductor supply chain to fully participate in the carbon reduction activity, so that we can move towards the goal of net zero emissions. This thesis focuses on the carbon reduction actions of Globalwafers and Shin-Etsu, the upstream silicon wafer companies, to explore how their internal resources are deployed, and how the external environment interacts with the companies to achieve sustainability. The research findings show that Globalwafers’s strategy is an all‐round enhancer. Because Taiwan’s regulations are slower than international ones, and its industrial status is lower than Shin-Etsu, Globalwafers is committed to setting carbon reduction and renewable energy goals, and enhance internal organizations participation, and then focus on supply chain. Relatively speaking, Shin-Etsu is an all‐round explorer. As Japan is an international leader in carbon reduction actions, Shin-Etsu tries to follow this progress. Shin-Etsu is a leader in the third-generation semiconductors market and other industries, and their score is relatively high in other carbon reduction actions, and a lot of resources are still invested in optimizing the existing business or improving the existing process, which belongs to outside-in strategy. This thesis analyzes the carbon emission pressure on the silicon wafer industry caused by the global environment, Taiwan and Japan society and regulations. And then, it discusses the internal resource deployment of Globalwafers and Shin-Etsu. Finally, it provides suggestions for the relevant industrial companies to evaluate carbon emission activities in the future. Due to the time limit, it is impossible to clearly show the immediate impact of the companies' carbon strategies on their respective operational and financial performance. Future research could further explore the relevant cost and financial impact of different carbon strategies, and also compare the effectiveness of different carbon strategies in reaching carbon reduction goals. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:17:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0507202222334300.pdf: 5291407 bytes, checksum: 9ee096bb1558376d05e40e4271a15f87 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 謝辭 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 五力分析 4 第二節 長期能源轉型架構 6 第三節 企業減碳策略 10 第三章 碳排外部環境分析 16 第一節 經濟 16 第二節 社會 17 第三節 科技 21 第四節 法規 22 第五節 結論 25 第四章 矽晶圓產業環境分析 27 第一節 半導體產業現況 27 第二節 矽晶圓產業競爭廠商 30 第三節 矽晶圓產業五力分析 34 第四節 結論 37 第五章 台灣環球晶碳排策略 39 第一節 環球晶介紹 39 第二節 減碳目標 40 第三節 製程及供應鏈改善 42 第四節 產品設計 45 第五節 新市場與業務開發 46 第六節 組織參與 47 第七節 對外關係 50 第八節 結論 52 第六章 日本信越集團碳排策略 53 第一節 信越集團介紹 53 第二節 減碳目標 53 第三節 製程及供應鏈改善 55 第四節 產品設計 57 第五節 新市場與業務開發 58 第六節 組織參與 59 第七節 對外關係 60 第八節 結論 61 第七章 結論與建議 63 參考文獻 69 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 矽晶圓廠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 碳排策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淨零排放 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 再生能源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 半導體產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Net Zero Emissions | en |
| dc.subject | Carbon Emissions Strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Semiconductor Industry | en |
| dc.subject | Silicon wafer company | en |
| dc.subject | Renewable Energy | en |
| dc.title | 以環球晶與信越探討矽晶圓供應商的碳排策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Exploratory Analysis of Wafer Manufacturers' Carbon Strategy: Examples from GlobalWafers and Shin-Etsu | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林舒柔,蘇威傑 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 碳排策略,半導體產業,矽晶圓廠,再生能源,淨零排放, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Carbon Emissions Strategy,Semiconductor Industry,Silicon wafer company,Renewable Energy,Net Zero Emissions, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201296 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-12 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0507202222334300.pdf | 5.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
