請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84824完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 邱俊翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jiunn-Shyang Chiou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李以雯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Wun Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:27:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 李奕霆 (2018),「離心機振動台試驗樁土互制行為之數值分析」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文。
2. 傅有為 (2021),「發展考量慣性力及地盤運動效應之樁基礎擬靜力分析方法」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 3. Aastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Drosos V., Georgarakos, T., and Kourkoulis R. (2008). “Design of bridges against large tectonic deformation.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(4), 345-368. 4. Agalianos, A., Coquereaumont, O.C., and Anastasopoulos, I. (2020). “Rigid slab foundation subjected to strike–slip faulting: mechanisms and insights.” Geotechnique 70(4), 354-373. 5. Ahmed, H.H., and Al-Zaidee, S.R. (2020). “Three-dimensional explicit finite element simulation of piled-raft foundation.” Journal of Engineering, 26(3), 127-144. 6. Anandarajah, A., Zhang, J., and Ealy, C. (2005). “Calibration of dynamic analysis methods from field test data.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(7-10), 763-772. 7. Anastasopoulos, I., Kourkoulis, R., Gazetas, G., and Tsatsis, A. (2013). “Interaction of piled foundation with a rupturing normal fault.” Geotechnique 63(12), 1042-1059. 8. Basile, F. (2012). “Pile-group response under seismic loading.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 28-30. 9. Boulanger, R.W., Curras, C.J., Kutter, B.L., Wilson, D.W., and Abghari, A. (1999). “Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysis.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(9), 750-759. 10. Bransby, M.F., Davies, M.C.R., EI Nahas, A., and Nagaoka, S. (2008). “Centrifuge modelling of reverse fault-foundation interaction.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6, 607-628. 11. Broms, B.B. (1964). “Lateral resistance of piles in cohesionless soils.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 90(3), 123-156. 12. Castelli, F., Maugeri, M., and Mylonakis, G. (2008). “Numerical analysis of kinematic soil-pile interaction.” AIP Conference Proceedings, 1020 (1),618-625. 13. Chiou, J.S., Yang, H.H., and Chen, C.H. (2009). “Use of plastic hinge model in nonlinear pushover analysis of a pile.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(9), 1341-1346. 14. Dezi, F., Carbonari, S., and Leoni, G. (2010). “Static equivalent method for the kinematic interaction analysis of single piles.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(8), 679-690. 15. Fukushima, S., and Tatsuoka, F. (1984). “Strength and deformation characteristics of saturated sand at extremely low pressures.” Soils and Foundations, 24(4), 30-48. 16. Hardin, B.O., and Drnevich, V.P. (1972a). “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Measurement and parameter effects.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98(6), 603-624. 17. Hardin, B.O., and Drnevich, V.P. (1972b). “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98(7), 667-692. 18. Hussien, M.N., Karray, M., Tobita, T., and Iai, S. (2015). “Kinematic and inertial forces in pile foundations under seismic loading.” Computers and Geotechnics, 69, 166-181. 19. Kondner, R.L. (1963). “Hyperbolic stress-strain response: Cohesive soils.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 89(1), 115-143. 20. Li, C.H., Lin, M.L., and Huang, W.C. (2019). “Interaction between pile groups and thrust faults in a physical sandbox and numerical analysis.” Engineering Geology, 252, 65-77. 21. Liyanapathirana, D.S., and Poulos, H.G. (2005). “Pseudostatic approach for seismic analysis of piles in liquefying soil.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(12), 1480-1487. 22. Luo, X., Murono, Y., and Nishimura, A. (2002). “Verifying adequacy of the seismic deformation method by using real examples of earthquake damage.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1), 17-28. 23. NAVFAC, DM 7.2 (1982). “Foundations and earth structures.” Design Manual, Department of the Navy Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria. 24. Oettle, N.K., and Bray, J.D. (2013). “Geotechnical mitigation strategies for earthquake surface fault rupture.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(11), 1864-1874. 25. Rasouli, H., and Fatahi, B. (2021a). “Effect of strike-slip fault rupture on piled raft foundation.” International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, 653-660. 26. Rasouli, H., and Fatahi, B. (2021b). “Geosynthetics reinforced interposed layer to protect structures on deep foundations against strike-slip fault rupture.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes 70, 722-736. 27. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (1970). “Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis.” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report no. EERC-70-10. 28. Tokimatsu, K., Hiroko, S., and Masayoshi, S. (2005). “Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(7-10), 753-762. 29. Toyooka, A., Murono, Y., Nogami, Y., and Nishimura, T. (2012). “Effect of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of various types of structures.” Quarterly Report of RTRI, 53(2), 93-101. 30. Wang, S., Kutter, B.L., Chacko, M.J., Wilson, D.W., Boulanger, R.W., and Abghari, A. (1998). “Nonlinear seismic soil-pile structure interaction.” Earthquake Spectra, 14(2), 377-396. 31. Yao, C., and Takemura, J. (2020). “Centrifuge modeling of single piles in sand subjected to dip-slip faulting.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 146(3), 04020001. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84824 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 樁基礎深埋於土層中常會受到地盤變位作用而造成損壞。地盤變位可能由地震或斷層錯動等因素所造成,然而,目前針對樁基礎受地震作用下之反應,大多關注上部結構慣性力作用之影響,而地盤變位對基礎之影響常被忽視,且在基礎受斷層作用下之反應亦較少以地盤變位的角度來探討。本研究主要分為兩個部分:第一部分探討樁基礎受地震作用下之反應,並針對其所引致之地盤位移剖面,發展出一擬靜力分析模式,以地盤位移側推分析之方式來預估基礎之受震反應;第二部分探討樁基礎受斷層作用下之反應,歸納出反應機制,並以此為基礎,發展一擬靜力分析模式來推估基礎受斷層作用下之反應。
在地震動引致地盤變位方面,本研究以傅有為(2021)之動態模型為基礎,透過數值分析軟體SAP2000進行基礎受震動態分析,並進一步發展擬靜力側推分析模式,探討基礎受地震動所引致之地盤位移剖面作用下反應,針對不同土壤條件及輸入運動,歸納出一組能有效預估基礎動態反應之特徵位移剖面。研究結果顯示:透過地盤最大位移剖面進行側推分析能掌握基礎受震下之樁身位移反應包絡線,且地表最大位移及加速度位移剖面能大致掌握基礎受震下之樁身內力反應包絡線。 為了探討基礎受斷層作用下之反應,本研究透過三維有限元素分析,針對斷層種類、錯動量及基礎與斷層錯動間之相對距離進行參數分析,並依基礎與土壤間相互作用關係,歸納出其反應機制。正斷層依照基礎與上盤土壤是否接觸,共區分為兩種機制,逆斷層則根據其引致之應變集中區及斷層破裂帶作用於基礎位置,區分為五種機制。 基於上述分析結果,本研究進一步以溫克基礎為架構,發展分析基礎受斷層所引致之地盤位移剖面作用下反應之擬靜力模式,並以三維有限元素分析結果進行驗證。依照各機制之作用原則,分別以不同側推分析方式進行擬靜力分析,此分析模式能大致上掌握基礎受斷層作用下之反應。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Pile is a deep foundation and is often damaged by ground displacement. Ground displacement may be caused by factors such as earthquake excitation and fault dislocation. However, if there is a superstructure, the response of the pile is mainly contributed by the inertial force under an earthquake, while the influence of ground displacement is often neglected. Moreover, the response of the pile under the fault dislocation is less discussed.
This study has two parts. (1) Discusses the response of the pile under the earthquake. This study uses SAP2000 to conduct the dynamic analysis and develops the pseudostatic analysis model to decide the characteristic ground displacement. The results show that the maximum ground displacement profile can predict the response envelope of the pile displacement under the earthquake, and the ground displacement profiles of the time that the displacement and acceleration occur at the ground surface can predict the response envelope of the pile internal force under the earthquake. (2) Discusses the response of the pile under the fault dislocation. This study uses 3D-ABAQUS to conduct a series of parameter analyses carried out on the types of faults, fault offset, and the distance between the foundation and the fault dislocation. The mechanism of the pile response was summarized according to the interaction between the foundation and the soil. Normal faults can be divided into two mechanisms according to whether the foundation and the hanging wall are in contact, and reverse faults can be divided into five mechanisms according to the pile position of the strain concentration zone and fault rupture zone caused by the fault. Next, based on the results, develop a pseudostatic analysis model by SAP2000 to predict the response of the pile under the fault. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:27:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-3008202212073200.pdf: 10449265 bytes, checksum: e8c0949dc627a9fd5a7d34b91d3fe3e8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 xiv 第一章 緒論 1-1 1.1研究背景與目的 1-1 1.2 研究方法 1-2 1.3 研究內容 1-2 第二章 文獻回顧 2-1 2.1 地震動引致之地盤位移對基礎之影響 2-1 2.1.1 地震動引致之地盤位移 2-2 2.1.2 地震動引致之地盤位移對基礎之影響 2-3 2.2 斷層引致之地盤位移對基礎之影響 2-5 2.2.1 斷層引致之地盤位移 2-5 2.2.2 斷層引致之地盤位移對基礎之影響 2-6 2.3 基礎受地震動及斷層作用下之分析模式 2-9 2.3.1 溫克基礎模型 2-9 2.3.2 三維有限元素模型 (3D FEM model) 2-12 2.4 地盤變位作用下之基礎設計考量 2-13 2.4.1 考量地震動下之基礎設計 2-13 2.4.2 考量斷層作用下之基礎設計 2-14 2.5 綜合評述 2-14 第三章 樁基礎受地震動引致地盤變位作用反應之擬靜力分析模式 3-1 3.1 動態反應分析 3-1 3.1.1 動態分析模式 3-2 3.1.2 動態反應之參數分析 3-5 3.2 擬靜力分析模式之發展 3-8 3.2.1 擬靜力分析模式 3-8 3.2.2 特徵位移剖面之決定 3-8 3.3 擬靜力分析方法驗證 3-11 3.4地盤位移剖面作用下基礎反應之參數分析 3-13 3.4.1 地盤位移剖面形狀之影響 3-14 3.4.2 樁頭束制情況之影響 3-15 3.5 小結 3-16 第四章 樁基礎受斷層作用下反應之三維有限元素分析 4-1 4.1 三維有限元素分析模式建立與驗證 4-1 4.1.1 材料組成模式及參數設定 4-1 4.1.2 三軸試驗模擬對象介紹及參數決定 4-4 4.1.3 三軸試驗之三維有限元素模型 4-6 4.1.4 三軸試驗擬合結果 4-7 4.1.5 斷層試驗模擬之參數設定及三維有限元素模型 4-8 4.1.6 分析與試驗結果比較 4-10 4.2 斷層錯動引致破裂面對基礎影響之參數分析 4-13 4.2.1 斷層種類對地盤位移剖面型態之影響 4-13 4.2.2斷層種類對樁基礎反應之影響 4-15 4.3 樁基礎受斷層作用下之反應機制及發展歷程 4-17 4.3.1 樁基礎受正斷層作用下之反應機制分類 4-18 4.3.2 樁基礎受正斷層作用下反應機制之發展歷程 4-18 4.3.3 樁基礎受逆斷層作用下之反應機制 4-19 4.3.4 樁基礎受逆斷層作用下反應機制之發展歷程 4-20 4.4 小結 4-21 第五章 樁受斷層引致之地盤位移作用下反應之溫克基礎模式 5-1 5.1 斷層引致變位之側推分析模式 5-1 5.1.1 分析模型 5-2 5.1.2 特徵位移剖面之決定及側推方式 5-2 5.2 驗證分析 5-3 5.2.1 分析案例介紹 5-4 5.2.2 擬靜力分析模型 5-5 5.2.3 側向反應比較 5-6 5.3 小結 5-10 第六章 結論與建議 6-1 6.1結論 6-1 6.2 建議 6-2 參考文獻 R-1 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 地震動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 樁基礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 擬靜力分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地盤變位 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 斷層作用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | pseudostatic analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Fault dislocation | en |
| dc.subject | Earthquake excitation | en |
| dc.subject | Pile foundations | en |
| dc.subject | Ground displacement | en |
| dc.title | 單樁受地震動與斷層錯動引致地盤變位作用下反應之擬靜力分析模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Pseudostatic Analysis Models of Single Pile Response under Ground Displacement Caused by Earthquake Excitation and Fault Dislocation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡祁欽;柯永彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chi-Chin Tsai;Yung-Yen Ko | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 樁基礎,地震動,斷層作用,地盤變位,擬靜力分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pile foundations,Earthquake excitation,Fault dislocation,Ground displacement,pseudostatic analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 168 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202962 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-30 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-08-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-110-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 10.2 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
