Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84729
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor賴勇成zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYung-Cheng Laien
dc.contributor.author薛功囷zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKung-Chun Hsuehen
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:22:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-26-
dc.date.copyright2022-09-12-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2002-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationAllotta, B., D'Adamio, P., Innocenti, A., Meli, E., & Pugi, L. (2015, May). An innovative algorithm for train detection. In 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings (pp. 1057-1062). IEEE.
Castillo, M. R. M., London, J. B. A., & Bretas, N. G. (2009, June). Network branch parameter validation based on a decoupled state/parameter estimator and historical data. In 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Chandra, V., & Kumar, K. V. (1997). Reliability and safety analysis of fault tolerant and fail safe node for use in a railway signalling system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 57(2), 177-183.
Chen, S. K., Ho, T. K., & Mao, B. H. (2007). Reliability evaluations of railway power supplies by fault-tree analysis. IET Electric Power Applications, 1(2), 161-172.
De Bruin, T., Verbert, K., & Babuška, R. (2016). Railway track circuit fault diagnosis using recurrent neural networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 28(3), 523-533.
Ebeling, C. E. (2004). An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Filograno, M. L., Guillén, P. C., Rodríguez-Barrios, A., Martín-López, S., Rodríguez-Plaza, M., Andrés-Alguacil, Á., & González-Herráez, M. (2011). Real-time monitoring of railway traffic using fiber Bragg grating sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 12(1), 85-92.
Grzechca, D., & Szczeponik, A. (2020). Comparison of filtering methods for enhanced reliability of a train axle counter system. Sensors, 20(10), 2754.
Hwang, J. G., Jo, H. J., & Kim, D. H. (2010, October). Hazard analysis of train control system using HAZOP-KR methods. In 2010 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (pp. 1971-1975). IEEE.
Jiang, L., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2016, October). Reliability assessment of ZPW-2000A track circuit using bayesian network. In 2016 11th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety (ICRMS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Lee, K. Y., Lee, K. K., & Ho, S. L. (2004). Exploration of using FBG sensor for axle counter in railway engineering. WSEAS Trans. on Sys, 6, 2440-2447.
Lin, J., Wang, X., & Dang, J. (2014). Reliability and safety verification of the new collision avoidance strategy for Chinese train control system. Computer Modelling and New Technologies, 18(9), 415-422.
Liu, Y., Wu, Y., & Kalbarczyk, Z. (2017, June). Smart maintenance via dynamic fault tree analysis: A case study on Singapore MRT system. In 2017 47th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN) (pp. 511-518). IEEE.
Lucic, I. (2005, October). Holistic safety performance forecasting for train detection system. In 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Vol. 3, pp. 2973-2978). IEEE.
Macciotta, R., Martin, C. D., Morgenstern, N. R., & Cruden, D. M. (2016). Quantitative risk assessment of slope hazards along a section of railway in the Canadian Cordillera—a methodology considering the uncertainty in the results. Landslides, 13(1), 115-127.
Moumin, M. A. (2017). Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa).
Mulazzani, M. (1985). Reliability versus safety. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 18(12), 141-146.
Namaki-Shoushtari, O., & Huang, B. (2014). Bayesian control loop diagnosis by combining historical data and process knowledge of fault signatures. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(6), 3696-3704.
National Transportation Safety Board. (2009). Collision of Two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metrorail Trains Near Fort Totten Station Washington, D.C., Publication PB2010-916302
Nishibori, N., Sasaki, T., Kawai, O., Ogushi, H., Kasai, T., & Toyoda, A. (2001, April). Development of tracking train detection device (COMBAT) by using wireless communication. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37235) (pp. 161-170). IEEE.
Nikolić, M. V., Kosić, B. D., Milanović, M. D., Antonić, N. M., Stojković, Ž. M., & Kokić, I. Z. (2014, November). Railway axle counter prototype. In 2014 22nd Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR) (pp. 694-697). IEEE.
Palmer, J. W. (2010, June). The need for train detection. In IET Professional Development Course on Railway Signalling and Control Systems (RSCS 2010) (pp. 52-64). IET.
Pasquale, T., Rosaria, E., Pietro, M., Antonio, O., & Ferroviario, A. S. (2003, October). Hazard analysis of complex distributed railway systems. In 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2003. Proceedings. (pp. 283-292). IEEE.
Paté‐Cornell, M. E. (1984). Fault trees vs. event trees in reliability analysis. Risk Analysis, 4(3), 177-186.
Railway Bureau. (2020). Ministry of Transportation and Communications. The South-Link Line Railway Electrification Project – The Turnkey Project of Mechanical and Electrical Systems – System Assurance Documents, Publication K001-0CR-RAM-0001-0, 2020
Sandidzadeh, M. A., & Dehghani, M. (2013). Intelligent condition monitoring of railway signaling in train detection subsystems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 24(4), 859-869.
Su, H., Dou, X., Shen, Z., & Su, L. (2018). Risk assessment approach for ZPW-2000A track circuit based on fuzzy grey theory. Intelligent Decision Technologies, 12(3), 381-388.
Su, H., & Wang, W. (2013). Analysis on reliability and security of ZPW-2000A track circuit system based on FMEDA and FTA. Sensors & Transducers, 25, 161.
Sun, S., Huang, D., & Gong, Y. (2011). Gross error detection and data reconciliation using historical data. Procedia Engineering, 15, 55-59.
Taiwan Railway Administration. (2009). Field Trip about the Reliability and Related Techniques of Railway Signaling Systems in Japan Publication C09704213.
Taiwan Transportation Safety Board. (2021). The Investigation Report of TRA’s Train Number 3501 and 333 Coexisted at the Same Signal Block, Publication TTSB-ROR-21-02-001.
Thorat, S. B., Jagtap, S., Murthy, R., Pal, S., & Kalyankar, N. V. (2011, November). Intelligent computing in railway signal engineering. In 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 12-17). IEEE.
Thurston, D., & Kozol, B. (2010, August). Axle counters vs. track circuits—Safety in track vacancy detection and broken rail detection. In Proc. Annu. Conf. Expo. American Railway Maintenance-of-Way Association (pp. 2-6).
Wang, C., Wang, L., Chen, H., Yang, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Fault Diagnosis of Train Network Control Management System Based on Dynamic Fault Tree and Bayesian Network. IEEE Access, 9, 2618-2632.
Wang, X., Guo, J., Jiang, L., Fu, J., & Li, B. (2016, August). Intelligent fault diagnosis and prediction technologies for condition based maintenance of track circuit. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT) (pp. 276-283). IEEE.
Wei, C. L., Lai, C. C., Liu, S. Y., Chung, W. H., Ho, T. K., Tam, H. Y., ... & Lee, K. Y. (2010). A fiber Bragg grating sensor system for train axle counting. IEEE Sensors Journal, 10(12), 1905-1912.
Wu, S., Ye, Q., Chen, C., & Gu, X. (2016). Research on data reconciliation based on generalized T distribution with historical data. Neurocomputing, 175, 808-815.
Xue, F. E. N. G., & Fuxi, W. (2011). Analysis on reliability and performance of computer-based interlocking system with the dynamic fault tree method. Journal of the China Railway Society, 33(12), 78-82.
Yasukawa, S., Takagi, N., Dong, G., Wakao, S., Takahashi, M., Yagi, M., & Okutani, T. (2015). Design optimization of magnetic sensor for train detection. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 51(3), 1-4.
Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Zhou, G., & Quan, H. (2014). Safety Analysis of ZPW-2000A/K Track Circuit System Based on Risk Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation (EITRT2013)-Volume I (pp. 383-392). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Zhang, S. Q., Lee, W. K., & Pong, P. W. (2013). Train detection by magnetic field measurement with giant magnetoresistive sensors for high-speed railway. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 284, pp. 2102-2114). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
Zhou, G., Zhao, H., & Guo, W. (2013, June). Safety requirements analysis and performance verification of hot standby system using colored Petri-net. In 2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) (pp. 656-661). IEEE.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84729-
dc.description.abstract列車位置偵測系統是鐵路號誌控制的基礎,為了提升可靠度與安全性,近年來鐵路系統開始採用多組偵測系統同時偵測。考慮到採用不同設計邏輯同時使用多組偵測系統時,可能造成可靠度與安全性的變化,本研究先提出一有效率的分析平台。理想的偵測系統分析架構應考慮股道配置、偵測區間分佈、邏輯設計、通過列車特性(長度、開通進路)等,來決定系統的可靠度與安全性,現今的分析方式大多仰賴人工步驟與判斷,效率較低且較為主觀,因此,本研究的第一個目標是開發一個分析平台,可以自動化產生所有失效情境、計算失效仍然安全 (fail safe) 與會造成危險 (wrong-side failure) 的機率、最終得出該系統設計下的可靠度與安全性指標。除此之外,本研究亦提出一高可靠度與安全性之創新偵測邏輯設計—基於模擬資料之投票邏輯。此邏輯先模擬所有可能情境,產生模擬資料庫,接著當列車進入該站區後,此邏輯隨即開始比對當下列車佔用狀況,與所建立的模擬資料庫是否相符。當系統有可被偵測的錯誤發生時,此邏輯能參考資料庫及自動修正錯誤。由案例分析結果得知,所提出之分析平台能應用於實際之路段,產生之可靠度與安全性指標可用來選擇路段中最佳的偵測設計邏輯。除此之外,將第二部分創新邏輯納入分析平台時,可以發現此邏輯設計,無論是在複雜股道,或是在多樣的車種狀況下,基於模擬資料之投票邏輯都有相當高的可靠度與安全性,應用此邏輯設計能顯著提升偵測系統的可靠度與安全性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractA train detection system is the basis of signaling and control in railway transportation, and there is a trend to adopt multiple train detection systems simultaneously to improve reliability and safety. Considering the change of the reliability and safety performance when adopting different design and logic of multiple train detection systems, this research first proposes an efficient evaluation framework. The ideal evaluation process for train detection systems should be able to determine their reliability and safety by considering the track layout, detection block, design logic, and train characteristics (length, routing). Existing methods still require a few manual interactions and human judgment, which could be inefficient and subjective. Consequently, this research develops a automatic framework to generate all failure scenarios, calculate the probability of fail-safe conditions and wrong-side failures, and finally determine the reliability and safety improvement index of the corresponding logic. In addition, this research also proposes an innovative design logic specially for dual train detection systems, namely, simulated data-based voting (SDBV) logic, in order to improve reliability and safety. The process first generates and stores all possible train detection data in a database, and then executes the standard or special process to trace the passing trains and correct possible detection errors on the basis of the simulated data. Results of case studies demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework to actual cases. The use of this framework can assist railways in identifying the appropriate design and logic of multiple train detection systems. As to the SDBV logic, it is proved to outperform other existing logics in terms of integrated performance in reliability and safety. Thus, applying this logic can substantially improve the reliability and safety of the dual train detection system.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:22:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0509202216222100.pdf: 8585271 bytes, checksum: c95297821691ddafefeca050a609e403 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
CONTENT v
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF TABLES x
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Research Objective 2
1.3 Contribution Summary 4
1.4 Thesis Organization 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Reliability and Safety Analysis 7
2.2 Improvement Strategies for Reliability and Safety of Train Detection Systems 13
2.2.1 Hardware Improvement 13
2.2.2 Software Improvement 14
2.3 Summary of Literature Review 17
CHAPTER 3 AUTOMATIC EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR RELIABILITY AND SAFETY OF MULTIPLE TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEMS 18
3.1 Train Detection System in TRA 18
3.1.1 Introduction of Track Circuit and Axle Counter 19
3.1.2 The Evolution of TRA Detection System 20
3.1.3 Introduction of Jiadong Accident 22
3.2 Overview of the Automatic Evaluation Framework 24
3.3 Automatic Scenario Enumeration Module 26
3.3.1 Track Layout Storage Process 26
3.3.2 Failure Mode Generation Process 27
3.3.3 Train Detection Data Enumeration Process 29
3.3.3.1 Failure Scenario Enumeration 29
3.3.3.2 Train Detection Data Generation 30
3.4 Reliability and Safety Evaluation Module 36
3.4.1 System Output Data Generation 37
3.4.2 Reliability and Safety Improvement Index Generation 38
3.4.2.1 Probability Calculation of Scenarios with Both Fail-Safe Conditions and Wrong-Side Failures 38
3.4.2.2 Reliability and Safety Improvement Index 39
3.5 Case Study 41
3.5.1 Case I—Fangshan Station Area 42
3.5.2 Case II—Jiadong Station Area 45
3.5.3 Discussion 47
CHAPTER 4 SIMULATED DATA BASED VOTING LOGIC IN DUAL TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEMS 49
4.1 Background of the Innovative Logic 49
4.2 The Framework of the Simulated Data Based Voting Logic in Dual Train Detection System 51
4.3 The Simulated Database Generation Module 53
4.4 The Standard Process for Identified Trains 54
4.5 The Special Process for Unidentified Trains 59
4.6 Case Study 64
4.6.1 Case I—Fangshan Station Area 65
4.6.2 Case II—Linbian Station Area with Complex Track Layout 66
4.6.3 Sensitivity Analysis under Conditions with Different No. of Types of Passing Trains 69
4.6.4 Discussion 72
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 74
5.1 Conclusion 74
5.2 Future Work 75
REFERENCE 77
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject列車位置偵測系統zh_TW
dc.subject鐵路運輸zh_TW
dc.subject可靠度zh_TW
dc.subject安全性zh_TW
dc.subject鐵路運輸zh_TW
dc.subject列車位置偵測系統zh_TW
dc.subject可靠度zh_TW
dc.subject安全性zh_TW
dc.subjectTrain Detection Systemen
dc.subjectRail Transportationen
dc.subjectSafetyen
dc.subjectReliabilityen
dc.subjectTrain Detection Systemen
dc.subjectRail Transportationen
dc.subjectSafetyen
dc.subjectReliabilityen
dc.title列車位置偵測邏輯之安全性與可靠度評估研究zh_TW
dc.titleEvaluation of Reliability and Safety for Multiple Train Detection Systems with Different Design Logicsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear110-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee廖慶隆;鍾志成;王翊倫zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChing-Lung Liao;Jyh-Cherng Jong;Yi-Lun Wangen
dc.subject.keyword鐵路運輸,列車位置偵測系統,可靠度,安全性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordRail Transportation,Train Detection System,Reliability,Safety,en
dc.relation.page82-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202203156-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2022-09-06-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2027-09-06-
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-110-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
8.38 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved