Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
  • 幫助
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 護理學系所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84722
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳佳儀(Chia-Yi Wu)
dc.contributor.authorJing-Rong Chengen
dc.contributor.author程靖容zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:22:18Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-10-04
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-09-06
dc.identifier.citation衛生福利部(2020),109年抗憂鬱藥物使用人數,2022年3月10日取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-1720-9734-113.html衛生福利部統計處(2020),109年度全民健康保險醫療統計年報,2022年3月10日取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-4648-113.html李麗紅、楊政議(2020)‧質性研究訪談個案數之判定:資料飽和概念之使用‧澄清醫護管理雜誌,16(1),47-52。DOI: 10.30156/CCMJ.201001.0007吳佳儀、李明濱、陳錫中(2016)‧情緒障礙症個案復元歷程中之社區再融入‧臺灣醫學,20(6),642-651。DOI: 10.6320/FJM.2016.20(6).11郭建成、鍾明勳、杜家興、李書棻、吳秀琴、張達人(2007)‧憂鬱症患者在團體治療中之人際互動模式 ‧中華團體心理治療,13(1),4-13。DOI: 10.30060/CGP.200703.0002張家銘(2009) ‧BSRS-5 相關論文整理‧自殺防治網通訊,,4(3),8-10。DOI: 10.30126/NSPN.200908.0005 程靖容、柯又予、李明濱、陳錫中、陳俊鶯、李明宗、吳佳儀 (2020) ‧難治型憂鬱症患者認知行為團體治療成效之前趨研究‧中華團體心理治療,26(3),15-31。DOI: 10.30060/CGP.200912.0001蔣欣欣(1987)‧促成團體心理治療中早退行為之脈絡因素‧醫學研究雜誌, 8(3),169-179。DOI: 10.30060/CGP.201003.0001鍾明勳、郭珀如、杜家興、林姵瑩、郭建成、張達人(2011)‧中文版雅樂姆療效因素量表之信效度‧中華團體心理治療,17(3),5-19。DOI: 10.30060/CGP.201109.0002鍾明勳、郭建成、杜家興、吳秀琴、林姵瑩、柯華寧、張達人(2008) ‧憂鬱症動力取向人際關係團體心理治療之氣氛變化及療效因素‧中華團體心理治療,14(4),5-23。DOI: 10.30060/CGP.200812.0002Beck, A. T. (1989). Psychiatry: cognitive therapy for depression and panic disorder. The Western Journal of Medicine, 151(3), 311. DOI:10.4103/0019-5545.49450Chiang, K. J., Chen, T. H., Hsieh, H. T., Tsai, J. C., Ou, K. L., & Chou, K. R. (2015). One-year follow-up of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for patients’ depression: A randomized, single-blinded, controlled study. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2015/373149Chen, H. C., Wu, C. H., Lee, Y. J., Liao, S. C., & Lee, M. B. (2005). Validity of the five-item Brief Symptom Rating Scale among subjects admitted for general health screening. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 104(11), 824-829. DOI: 10.29828/JFMA.200511.0008Cusin C., Peyda S. (2019). Treatment-Resistant Depression. In The Massachusetts General Hospital Guide to Depression, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97241-1_1Ekers, D., Murphy, R., Archer, J., Ebenezer, C., Kemp, D., Gilbody, S. (2013). Nurse-delivered collaborative care for depression and long-term physical conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 149 (1–3), 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.032Feng, C. Y., Chu, H., Chen, C. H., Chang, Y. S., Chen, T. H., Chou, Y. H., ... & Chou, K. R. (2012). The effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression: A meta‐analysis 2000–2010. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 9(1), 2-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00229.xFife, D., Feng, Y., Wang, M. Y. H., Chang, C. J., Liu, C. Y., Juang, H. T., ... & Wang, B. (2017). Epidemiology of pharmaceutically treated depression and treatment resistant depression in Taiwan. Psychiatry Research, 252, 277-283. DOI:10.1016/ j.psychres.2017.03.006 Gale, N. K., Health, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. Medical Research Methodology , 13, 117. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 Gaynes, B. (2016). Assessing the Risk Factors for Difficult-to-Treat Depression and Treatment-Resistant Depression. J Clin Psychiatry, 77, 4–8. DOI:10.4088/J CP. 14077cc2c Hauber, K., Boon, A. E., & Vermeiren, R. (2019). Therapeutic factors that promote recovery in high-risk adolescents intensive group psychotherapeutic MBT programme. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 13(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s13034-019-0263-6 Huong, P. T. T., Wu, C. Y., Lee, M. B., & Chen, I. M. (2022). Associations of Suicide Risk and Community Integration Among Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. Frontiers in psychiatry, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.806291Huong, P. T. T., Wu, C. Y., Lee, M. B., Hung, W. C., Chen, I. M., & Chen, H. C. (2022). The Influence of Research Follow-Up during COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Distress and Resilience: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Treatment-Resistant Depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3738. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063738 Salazar-Fraile, J., Sempere-Verdú, E., Pérez-Hoyos, S., Tabarés-Seisdedos, R., & Gómez-Beneyto, M. (2018). Five interpersonal factors are predictive of the response to treatment of major depression with antidepressants in primary care. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 416. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00416 Sheets, E. S., & Armey, M. F. (2020). Daily Interpersonal and Noninterpersonal Stress Reactivity in Current and Remitted Depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-020-10096-2 Kasper, S., & Montgomery, S. (2013). Treatment-resistant depression, John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118556719 Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2004). The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(4), 631-636. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.631 Li, J. M., Zhang, Y., Su, W. J., Liu, L. L., Gong, H., Peng, W., & Jiang, C.L. (2018). Cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 268, 243-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018. 07.020 Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/97814129862681.n232 Lopez, M. A., & Basco, M. A. (2015). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in public mental health: Comparison to treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(1), 87-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-014-0546-4 Malhi, G. S., & Mann, J. J. (2018). Seminar Depression. Lancet, 392: 2299–2312. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31948-2 Matsunaga, M., Okamoto, Y., Suzuki, S. I., Kinoshita, A., Yoshimura, S., Yoshino, A., ... & Yamawaki, S. (2010). Psychosocial functioning in patients with treatment-resistant depression after group cognitive behavioral therapy. BMC Psychiatry, 10(1), 22. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-22Mohd, T. A. M. T., Yunus, R. M., Hairi, F., Hairi, N. N., & Choo, W. Y. (2019). Social support and depression among community dwelling older adults in Asia: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 9(7), 1-12. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026667Molenaar, P. J., Boom, Y., Peen, J., Schoevers, R. A., Van, R., & Dekker, J. J. (2011). Is there a dose–effect relationship between the number of psychotherapy sessions and improvement of social functioning?. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 268-282. DOI: 10.1348/014466510X516975Murphy, J. A., Sarris, J., & Byrne, G. J. (2017). A review of the conceptualisation and risk factors associated with treatment-resistant depression. Depression Research and Treatment, 2017, 1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4176825Nance, D. C. (2012). Pains, joys, and secrets: nurse-led group therapy for older adults with depression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 33(2): 89-95. DOI:10.3109/01612840.2011.624258Ng, C., Kato, T., Han, C., Wang, G., Trivedi, M., Ramesh, V., Shao, D., Gala, S., Narayanan, S., Tan, W., Feng, Y., & Kasper, S. (2019). Definition of treatment-resistant depression – Asia Pacific perspectives. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 626–636. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.038 Okumura, Y., & Ichikura, K. (2014). Efficacy and acceptability of group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 164, 155-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.023 Pandarakalam, J. P. (2018). Challenges of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatria Danubina, 30(3), 273-284. DOI: 10.24869/psyd.2018.273 Parikh, S. V., Quilty, L. C., Ravitz, P., Rosenbluth, M., Pavlova, B., Grigoriadis, S., ... & CANMAT Depression Work Group. (2016). Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 2. Psychological treatments. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(9), 524-539. DOI: 10.1177/0706743716659418 Petersen, I., Bhana, A., & Baillie, K. (2012). The Feasibility of Adapted Group-Based Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) for the Treatment of Depression by Community Health Workers Within the Context of Task Shifting in South Africa. Community Mental Health Journal ,48 (3), 336-341. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-011-9429-2 Savikko, N., Routasalo, P., Tilvis, R., & Pitkälä, K. (2010). Psychosocial group rehabilitation for lonely older people: favourable processes and mediating factors of the intervention leading to alleviated loneliness. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 5(1), 16-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00191.x Schaub, A., Goldmann, U., Mueser, T. K., Goerigk, S., Hautzinger, M., Roth, E., ... & Möller, H. J. (2018). Efficacy of extended clinical management, group CBT, and group plus individual CBT for major depression: results of a two-year follow-up study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 238, 570-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.081 Thimm, J. C., & Antonsen, L. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression in routine practice. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-014-0292-x Voineskos, D., Daskalakis, Z., & Blumberger, D. (2020). Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 16, 221–234. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S198774 Wiles, N., Thomas, L., Abel, A., Ridgway, N., Turner, N., Campbell, J., ... & Kuyken, W. (2013). Cognitive behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for primary care based patients with treatment resistant depression: results of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 381(9864), 375-384. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61552-9 World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders. Retrieved May 15, 2022 from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates. Yalom, ID, Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy, New York, NY: Basic Books. DOI: 10.1017/S0141347300007254 Zhang, B., Ding, X., Lu, W., Zhao, J., Lv, Q., Yi, Z., Zhang, S., & Chen, Y. (2016). Effect of group cognitive-behavioral therapy on the quality of life and social functioning of patients with mild depression. Shanghai Archive of Psychiatry, 28(1), 18–27. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00047 Zimmermann, T., Puschmann, E., van den Bussche, H., Wiese, B., Ernst, A., Porzelt, S., Daubmann, A., Scherer, M. (2016). Collaborative nurse-led self-management support for primary care patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (findings of the SMADS study). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63, 101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84722-
dc.description.abstract研究背景:憂鬱症(depressive disorders)是一個常見的精神疾病,盛行率為4.4%,現階段憂鬱症治療以藥物處置為主,然而臨床上有近三分之一的個案服藥治療後仍無法痊癒,被稱之為難治型憂鬱症(treatment-resistant depression, TRD)。已有許多針對憂鬱症與TRD個案的認知行為團體研究證實認知行為治療與藥物治療併行可有效減少憂鬱症狀,但關於認知行為治療合併以團體做為介入的方式,應用於難治型憂鬱症個案的研究卻付之闕如,質性相關的內容探討更是未見。研究目的:本研究目的在探討運用認知行為治療技巧於支持性團體中,幫助TRD個案穩定病情之可行性與成效,研究者同時分析影響個案復元的社會心理因素、觀察TRD個案的人際關係與互動特色,並運用亞隆團體概念分析TRD團體產生的團體療效因子。研究方法:本研究採質性研究法,研究者參與指導教授研究團隊已發展之八週認知行為治療為基礎的TRD團體架構,每周進行兩小時的團體討論及一小時會後會討論,同時取得個案同意於現場錄音錄影,作為逐字稿資料分析來源,並輔以簡式健康量表(即心情溫度計, Brief Symptom Rating Scale, BSRS-5) 監測個案的心理困擾程度、並以亞隆(Yalom)中文版療效因素量表追蹤團員對團體療效因子之感受。研究結果:共有23位個案參與認知行為團體治療,經過三梯次的八週團體分析,共得出22個次主題,歸納整理後得出五大主題,分別是團體互動特色與歷程、疾病因應與治療經驗、心理社會行為表現、壓力感受暨管理技巧及社區再融入等五項,團體互動特色與歷程,指在團體進行時,團體成員於此時此刻所發生的人際互動,以及亞隆團體療效因子的分析;疾病因應與治療經驗,主要了解成員的疾病治療過程與就醫經驗,自覺服藥遵從性的狀況,遇到不適症狀與疾病污名時如何自我因應面對;心理社會行為表現,涵蓋了自我反思、孤獨、自殺議題、酒精物質等社會心理議題;壓力感受暨管理技巧,包含回家作業實作討論與成員主觀對於壓力事件的感受分享;支持來源與社區生活規劃,涵蓋成員的社區支持系統來源以及種類。研究者分別於團體第三週、第八週及團體結束後一個月進行亞隆中文版療效因素量表追蹤分析,三梯次團體追蹤分數皆顯示,在團體第三週成員們對療效因子的感受性最低,而在團體結束後一個月成員們對療效因子的感受性最強,但三個時間點的追蹤分數並未達顯著差異,並發現情緒宣洩、資訊傳遞、普同感為最常出現之團體療效因子,另外,BSRS-5分數曲線顯示認知行為團體互動過程可維持成員的情緒狀態在穩定的水平,不至於因議論負面議題而導致顯著的負向心理困擾,三梯次的團體成員們於參加八週團體期間,每週心情溫度曲線圖皆未有明顯下降。結論與建議:團體治療能穩定TRD個案之憂鬱症狀及心理困擾,社區再融入之生活規劃搭配壓力管理技巧、心理社會議題因應與提升治療遵從等.有助於復元,未來可針對TRD團體進行更多研究與實務經驗之累積,以提供政策及學術未來之參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: Depression disorder is a common mental disorder with a prevalence rate of 4.4% in general population. At present, the treatment of depression is mainly medication treatment, but nearly one-third of clinical cases are still difficult to treat and therefore known as treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The efficacy of combining gCBT and medication on TRD and depression patients is confirmed by previous studies. However, research on TRD patients is lacking especially the qualitative research.Purposes: The purpose of this research is to explore the feasibility of using gCBT in TRD by analyzing the social and psychological factors that affect the recovery and observe the interpersonal、interactive characteristics of TRD. The concept of Yalom group was applicated to analyze the group therapeutic factors in this study.Methods: The qualitative research method was used in this study. The researchers participated in an eight-week cognitive-behavioral therapy-based TRD group structure developed by the supervisory research team. Two hours of group discussions and one-hour post-meeting discussions were held each week. After the consents of the participants were obtained. Video and verbatim transcripts were recorded as the source of data analysis. The BSRS-5 scale was to monitor the psychological distress, the Yalom Chinese version of the therapeutic factor scale was to track the group members' response to the group therapeutic factors.Results: A total of 23 clients participated in the gCBT. After three stages of eight-week group analysis, a total of 22 sub-themes were obtained. Five major themes were summarized as: group interaction characteristics and process, disease coping and treatment experience, psychosocial behavioral performance, stress perception and management skills, and community reintegration. The follow-up analysis of the Chinese version of the therapeutic factor scale of Yalom was carried out in the third week, eighth week and one month after the group, respectively. The results of follow up scores showed that, the sensitivity to the therapeutic factor were lowest in the third week otherwise showed highest on one month after the end of the group. The tracking scores at the three time points did not reach a significant difference. Catharsis, imparting of information, and universality were the most frequently group therapeutic factors. The BSRS-5 score curve shows that the cognitive behavioral group interaction process can maintain the emotional state of members at a stable level, without causing significant negative psychological distress. The weekly score curve did not show a significant decrease during the study period.Conclusion and implications: gCBT can stabilize depressive symptoms and psychological distress in TRD. It is helpful for recovery, such as life planning for community reintegration, stress management skills, coping with psychosocial issues and improving treatment compliance. For research and practical experience is needed in gCBT for the TRD patients to provide a reference for policy and academic future.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:22:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0509202218512400.pdf: 3033016 bytes, checksum: f64237cabd413569185add19c313cb0d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………………I 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………V ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………VII 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………… IX 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………… XI 表目錄………………………………………………………………………………… XI 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………………4 第三節 研究問題……………………………………………………………………5 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………6 第一節 難治型憂鬱症………………………………………………………………6 第二節 認知行為團體治療………………………………………………………8 第三節 憂鬱症患者之人際關係…………………………………………………11 第四節 亞隆療效因子…………………………………………………………12 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………14 第一節 研究設計……………………………………………………………14 第二節 研究工具……………………………………………………………15 第三節 收案流程與資料搜集過程…………………………………………16 第四節 資料分析過程………………………………………………………16 第五節 研究嚴謹度…………………………………………………………17 第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………………19 第一節 個案基本屬性與量表資料分析…………………………………19 第二節 團體主題分析………………………………………………………22 第三節 三梯次團體過程分析與亞隆療效因子……………………………49 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………72 第五章 討論……………………………………………………………78 第一節 團體結構與流失率…………………………………………………78 第二節 團體動力與人際間之互動與改變…………………………………80 第三節 成員特質與人際互動………………………………………………81 第四節 團體介入對TRD病患心理困擾的影響……………………………84 第五節 研究限制……………………………………………………………85 第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………86 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………86 第二節 實務應用與建議……………………………………………………86 參考資料…………………………………………………………………88 圖目錄 圖一、三梯次團體成員對團體療效因子感受性變化 (N=19)…………………20 圖二、第一梯次團體成員BSRS總分變化 (N=7)…………………………………21 圖三、第二梯次團體成員BSRS總分變化 (N=9)………………………………21 圖四、第三梯次團體成員BSRS總分變化 (N=4)…………………………………21 圖五、難治型憂鬱症團體主題分析圖………………………………………………23 圖六、第一梯次團體座位圖…………………………………………………………49 圖七、第二梯次團體座位圖………………………………………………………56 圖八、第三梯次團體座位圖…………………………………………………………65 圖九、第三梯次團體自第五週起座位圖……………………………………………65 表目錄 表一、Thase和Rush TRD分級…………………………………………………6 表二、憂鬱症認知行為團體治療文獻整理………………………………………10 表三、難治型憂鬱症患者團體介入之主題與內容………………………………14 表四、三梯次團體基本資料表 (N=23) …………………………………………20 表五、團體成員代號說明…………………………………………………………24 表六、第一梯次團體療效因子與當週議題之週間變動與更迭…………………50 表七、第二梯次團體療效因子與當週議題之週間變動與更迭…………………58 表八、第三梯次團體療效因子與當週議題之週間變動與更迭…………………66 表九、亞隆療效因子分析表(N=23)………………………………………………74 表十、第一梯次團體主體週次與療效因子對照表…………………………………75 表十一、第二梯次團體主體週次與療效因子對照表………………………………76 表十二、第三梯次團體主體週次與療效因子對照表………………………………77 表十三、對照Yalom與本研究個案流失原因………………………………………79
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title難治型憂鬱症患者接受認知行為團體治療之歷程分析zh_TW
dc.titleA process analysis of the group-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with treatment-resistant depressionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李明濱(Ming-Been Lee),林梅鳳(Mei-Feng Lin),鍾明勳(Ming-Shun Chung)
dc.subject.keyword難治型憂鬱症,認知行為團體,歷程分析,亞隆療效因子,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordtreatment-resistant depression,cognitive-behavioral therapy group,process analysis,therapeutic factors,en
dc.relation.page92
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202203171
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-09-07
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept護理學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-10-04-
顯示於系所單位:護理學系所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0509202218512400.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
2.96 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved