Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 牙醫專業學院
  4. 臨床牙醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84385
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭彥彬(Yen-Ping Kuo)
dc.contributor.authorI-Ping Linen
dc.contributor.author林意萍zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:09:59Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-03-24
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-03-18
dc.identifier.citationAbrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. (1997). The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of clinical periodontology.1997;24(8):568-572. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J: The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:568-572. Adibrad M, Shahabuei M, Sahabi M. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:232-237. Agudio G, Cortellini P, Buti J, Pini Prato G. Periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival augmentation surgery compared with untreated contralateral homologous sites: an 18- to 35-year long-term study. J Periodontol 2016;87:1371-1378. Akcan SK, Güler B, Hatipoğlu H. The effect of different gingival phenotypes on dimensional stability of free gingival graft: A comparative 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol. 2019;90:709–717. Allen AL. Use of the supraperiosteal envelop in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. I. Rationale and Technique. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994;14:217-227. Anderegg CR, Metzler DG, Nicoll BK. Gingival thickness in guided tissue regeneration and associated recession at furcation defects. J Periodontol 1995;66:197-402. Araújo JO, Bergamaschi CC, Lopes LC, Guimarães CC, de Andrade NK, Ramacciato JC, Motta RHL. Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021;11(1):e043363. Arzouman A, Deas DE, Mills MP, Huynh-Ba G, Prihoda TJ, Mealey BL. Impact of different surgical protocols on dimensional changes of free soft tissue autografts. A randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2020;1–9. Avila‐Ortiz G, Gonzalez‐Martin O, Couso‐Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 2020;91(3):283-288. Bahammam MA. Effect of platelet-rich fibrin palatal bandage on pain scores and wound healing after free gingival graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(9):3179-3188. Baldi C, Pini-Prato G, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series. J Periodontol. 1999;77:1077–1084. Barbosa FI, Corr.a DS, Zen.bio EG, Costa FO, Shibli JA. Dimensional changes between free gingival grafts fixed with ethyl cyanoacrylate and silk sutures. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2009;11(2):170-176. Basegmez C, Ersanli S, Demirel K, B.lükbasi N, Yalcin S. The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of periimplant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5:139-145. Basegmez C, Karabuda ZC, Demirel K, Yalcin S. The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of peri-implant attached mucosa: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6(2):145-152. Becker K, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Schwarz F. Impact of abutment material and dis-/re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 774–780. Bittencourt S, Del Peloso Ribeiro E, Sallum EA, et al. Comparative 6- month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2006;77:174-181. Blanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Nóvoa L, Batalla P, Martín‐Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2018;29(1);108-117. Bosch JA, Engeland CG, Cacioppo JT, Marucha PT. Depressive symptoms predict mucosal wound healing. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(7):597-605. Bouri AJ, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:323-326. Bowers GM. A study of the width of attached gingiva. J Periodonto.l 1963;34:201-209. Boynueğri D, Nemli S K, Kasko YA, Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2013;24:928–933.Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02475.x Breivik T, Opstad PK, Gjermo P, Thrane PS. Effects of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity on periodontal tissue destruction in rats. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108(2):115-122. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(3):287-293. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Fundamental principles in periodontal plastic surgery and mucosal augmentation - a narrative review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(Suppl. 15):S98–S107. Buyukozdemir Askin S, Berker E, Akincibay H, et al. Necessity of keratinized tissues for dental implants: a clinical, immunological, and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:1-12. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(suppl):136-162. Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. The influence of implant‐abutment connection to peri‐implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2018;20(4):653-664. Carranza FA, Carroro JJ, Albano E. Mukogingival surgery. Stahl, S. S. (ed), Periodontal Surgery. Biologic Basis and Technique. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, III, 1976. Canullo, L., Pe.arrocha‐Oltra, D., Covani, U., Botticelli, D., Serino, G., & Penarrocha, M. Clinical and microbiological findings in patients with peri‐implantitis: A cross‐sectional study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;27(3):376–382. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 suppl):S8-51. Chambrone L, Tatakis D. Long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87:796-808. Chou YH, Tsai CC, Wang JC, et al. New classification of crown forms and gingival characteristics in Taiwanese. Open Dent J. 2008;28(2):114-119. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1410-1420. Corcuera-Flores JR, Silvestre-Rangil J, Cutando-Soriano A, López-Jiménez J. Current methods of sedation in dental patients - a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(5):e579-586. Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S204–S213. Cutando A, Galindo P, Gómez-Moreno G, Arana C, Bolaños J, Acuña-Castroviejo D, Wang HL. Relationship between salivary melatonin and severity of periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2006;77(9):1533-1538. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, et al. The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:428-433. Doshi A, McAuley JW, Tatakis DN. Topical phenytoin effects on palatal wound healing. Journal of Periodontology. 2021;92:409-418. Ebrecht M, Hextall J, Kirtley LG, Taylor A, Dyson M, Weinman J. Perceived stress and cortisol levels predict speed of wound healing in healthy male adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(6):798-809. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23:839–845. Esposito E, Cuzzocrea S. Antiinflammatory activity of melatonin in central nervous system. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2010;8(3):228-242. Fisher KR. Künzlberger A, Donos N, et al. Gingival biotype revisited- novel classification and assessment tool. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):443-448. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Vach K, Ratka-Kruger P. The effect of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant outcome under supportive postimplant therapy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 1):e236-e244. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, et al. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol. 2010;81:569–574. Galindo‐Moreno P, León‐Cano A, Monje A, Ortega‐Oller I, O Valle F, Catena A. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri‐implant marginal bone loss. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2016;27(2):167-173. Genco RJ, Ho AW, Kopman J, Grossi SG, Dunford RG, Tedesco LA. Models to evaluate the role of stress in periodontal disease. Ann Periodontol. 1998;3(1):288-302. Gendy MN, Lagzdins D, Schaman J, Foll BL. Melatonin for treatment-seeking alcohol use disorder patients with sleeping problems: a randomized clinical pilot trial. Sci Rep. 2020;26:10(1):8739. Giannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F, Groups of the 2nd Osteology Foundation Consensus Meeting. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 15):7-10. Goaslind GD, Robertson PB, Mahan CJ, et al. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol. 1977;48:768-771. Goldman HM, Isenberg G, Shuman. The gingival autograft and gingivectomy. J Periodontol. 1976; 47: 586. Graziano TS, Closs P, Poppi T, Franco GC, Cortelli JR, Groppo FC, Cogo K. Catecholamines promote the expression of virulence and oxidative stress genes in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(5):660-669. Grischke J, Karch A, Wenzlaff A, Foitzik MM, Stiesch M, Eberhard J. Keratinized mucosa width is associated with severity of peri‐implant mucositis. A cross‐sectional study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:457–465. Gumus P, Buduneli E. Graft stabilization with cyanoacrylate decreases shrinkage of free gingival grafts. Aust Dent J. 2014;59:57–64. Güncü GN, Keçeli HG, Ercan E, Hatipoğlu H, İlhan D, T.züm TF. Vertical and horizontal dimensional evaluation of sutureless free gingival grafts. Clin Dentistry Res. 2012;36:29–35. Gupta A, Jain GK, Raghubir R. A time course study for the development of an immunocompromised wound model, using hydrocortisone. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1999;41(4):183-187. Hatipoglu H, Keceli HG, Guncu GN, Sengun D, Tozum TF. Vertical and horizontal dimensional evaluation of free gingival grafts in the anterior mandible: a case report series. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:107–113. Hilgert JB, Hugo FN, Bandeira DR, Bozzetti MC. Stress, cortisol, and periodontitis in a population aged 50 years and over. J Dent Res. 2006;85(4):324-328. Hirschtritt ME, Olfson M, Kroenke K. Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines. JAMA. 2021;325(4):347-348. Hoim-Pedersen P. & Loe H. Wound healing in the gingiva of young and old individuals. Scandinavian. J Dent Res. 1971;79:40-53. Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1625-1634. James WC, McFall WT, Jr. Placement of free gingival grafts on denuded alveolar bone. Part I: clinical evaluations. J Periodontol. 1978;49:283–290 Johnson BD, Engel D. Acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis. A review of diagnosis, etiology and treatment. J Periodontol. 1986;57(3):141-150. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(suppl 1):S237-S248. Jung R, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, et al. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(3):251-257. Kabir L, Stiesch M, Grischke J. The effect of keratinized mucosa on the severity of peri-implant mucositis differs between periodontally healthy subjects and the general population: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Invest. 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03422-1 Kahn S, Almeida Rocha RA, Dias AT, et al. Clinical considerations on the root coverage of gingival recessions in thin or thick biotype. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36:409-415. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:237-243. Kao RT, Curtis DA, Kim DM, et al. American Academy of Periodontology best evidence consensus statement on modifying periodontal phenotype in preparation for orthodontic and restorative treatment. J Periodontol. 2020;91:289–298. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick versus thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002;30(7):521-526. Katafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, Chen, YW, Daubert DM. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri‐implantitis: A cross‐sectional radiographic analysis. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2018;45(2):225-232. Kloukos D, Koukos G, Doulis I, et al. Gingival thickness assessment at the mandibular incisors with four methods: A cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2018;89:1300–1309. Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020;91:311–338. Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:e24-e28. Kim DM, Neiva R. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86:S56-S72. Kim JJ, Lee JH, Kim JC, Lee JB, Yeo ISL. Biological responses to the transitional area of dental implants: Material-and structure-dependent responses of peri-implant tissue to abutments. Materials. 2020;13(1):72. Lafzi A, Kadkhodazadeh M, Mojahedi SM, Amid R, Shidfar S, Baghani MT. The Clinical Evaluation of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Donor and Recipient Sites of the Free Gingival Graft: A Case Series. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019;10(4):355-360. Lang NP, Loe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972; 43:623–627. [PubMed: 4507712] Lee KA, Stotts NA. Support of the growth hormone-somatomedin system to facilitate healing. Heart Lung. 1990;19(2):157-162. Lee SA, Kim AC, Prusa LA, Jr., Kao RT. Characterization of dental anatomy and gingival biotype in Asian populations. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013;41:36-39. Lee WZ, Ong MMA, Yeo AB. Gingival profiles in a select Asian cohort: a pilot study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):e12269. LeResche L, Dworkin SF. The role of stress in inflammatory disease, including periodontal disease: review of concepts and current findings. Periodontol 2000 2002;30:91-103. Lindhe J, Socransky S, Nyman S, Westfelt E, Haffajee A. Effect of age on healing following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1985;12:774–787. Lin GH, Curtis DA, Kapila Y, et al. The significance of surgically modifying soft tissue phenotype around fixed dental prostheses: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020;91:339–351. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2009;24(4). Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Gineviciute E, Linkeviciene L. The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2‐year randomized clinical trial. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2020;22(4):497-506. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17(6):1228-1236. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Svediene O, Linkevicius R, Linkeviciene L. Radiological comparison of laser‐microtextured and platform‐switched implants in thin mucosal biotype. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26(5):599-605. Manani G, Paniz P, Beltrame A, Brunelli GF, Zanardi L, Piranese A. Analisi in doppio cieco delle possibilità di impiego del trazodone nella sedazione del paziente odontoiatrico ambulatoriale [Double-blind analysis of the possibilities of the use of trazodone in sedation of ambulatory dental patients]. Minerva Stomatol. 1979;28(3):193-200. Marrone A, Lasserre J, Bercy P, Brecx MC. Prevalence and risk factors for peri-implant disease in Belgian adults. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:934–940. Marucha PT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Favagehi M. Mucosal wound healing is impaired by examination stress. Psychosom Med. 1998; 60(3):362-365. Maynard JG Jr., Ochsenbein C. Mucogingival problems, prevalence and therapy in children. J Periodontol. 1975;46:543-552. McHugh RK, Peckham AD, Björgvinsson T, Korte FM, Beard C. Benzodiazepine misuse among adults receiving psychiatric treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;128:33-37. Monje A, Blasi G. Significance of keratinized mucosa/gingiva on peri-implant and adjacent periodontal conditions in erratic maintenance compliers. J Periodontol. 2019;90:445–453. Monje A, Pons R, Insua A, Nart J, Wang HL, Schwarz F. Morphology and severity of peri‐implantitis bone defects. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2019;21(4):635-643. Mörmann W, Schaer F, Firestone AR. The relationship between success of free gingival grafts and transplant thickness – Revascularization and shrinkage – A one year clinical study. J Periodontol. 1981;52:74-80. Motta SHG, Camacho MPF, Quintela DC, Santana RB. Relationship between clinical and histologic periodontal biotypes in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37:737-741. Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:65-71. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:621-626. Nunes, O.D.S.; Pereira, R.D.S. Regression of herpes viral infection symptoms using melatonin and SB-73: Comparison with Acyclovir. J Pineal Res. 2008;44:373–378. Oh SL, Ji C, Azad S. Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:777–785 Oh S-L, Masri RM, Williams DA, Ji C, Romberg E. Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting lack of keratinized mucosa: a prospective controlled randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44: 195–203. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18:78-82. Parvini P, Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Obreja K, Magini RdS, Sader R, Schwarz F. A prospective study assessing three-dimensional changes of mucosal healing following soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts. J Periodontol. 2020;1–9. Permuy M, López-Peña M, González-Cantalapiedra A and Muñoz F. Melatonin: a review of its potential functions and effects on dental diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18: 865 Perussolo J, Souza AB, Matarazzo F, Oliveira RP, Araujo MG. Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort: a 4-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:1177-1185 Peruzzo DC, Benatti BB, Ambrosano GM, Nogueira-Filho GR, Sallum EA, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr. A systematic review of stress and psychological factors as possible risk factors for periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2007;78(8):1491-1504. Pourhanifeh MH, Hosseinzadeh A, Dehdashtian E, Hemati K, Mehrzadi S. Melatonin: new insights on its therapeutic properties in diabetic complications. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12:30. Pugazhenthi K, Kapoor M, Clarkson AN, Hall I, Appleton I. Melatonin accelerates the process of wound repair in full-thickness incisional wounds. J Pineal Res. 2008;44(4):387-396. Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone‐level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26(2):123-129. Rasperini G, Acunza R, Cannalire P, Farronato G. Influence of periodontal biotype on root surface exposure during orthodontic treatment: a preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015;35(5):665-675. Ravidà A, Saleh I, Siqueira R, et al. Influence of keratinized mucosa on the surgical therapeutical outcomes of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:529–539. Rose M, Sanford A, Thomas C, Opp MR. Factors altering the sleep of burned children. Sleep 2001;24(1):45-51. Rozlog LA, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Marucha PT, Sheridan JF, Glaser R. Stress and immunity: implications for viral disease and wound healing. J Periodontol 1999;70(7):786-792. Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:491-496. Rokn, A., Aslroosta, H., Akbari, S., Najafi, H., Zayeri, F., & Hashemi, K. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis in patients not participating in well‐designed supportive periodontal treatments: A cross‐sectional study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2016; 28(3): 314–319. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(1):55-89. Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, Agaimy A, Schlegel KA. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013; 84:914-923. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1170-1177. Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. Journal of clinical periodontology.2014;41:S6-22. Sculean A, Romanos G, Schwarz F, Ramanauskaite A, Keeve PL, Khoury F, Koo KT, Cosgarea R. Soft-tissue management as part of the surgical treatment of periimplantitis: a narrative review. Implant Dent. 2019;28(2):210-216. Serio FG, Hawley C. Manual of Clinical Periodontics. Hudson, OH:Lexi-Comp;2009. Shimomoto T, Nakano T, Shintani A, Ono S, Inoue M, Yatani H. Evaluation of the effect of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant tissue health using a multivariate analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2020. doi.org/10.2186/jpr. JPOR_2019_391. Shivananda H, Raghava KV, Sudhakar SK, Thomas B, Dayakar MM. Comparative evaluation of oxygen saturation during periodontal surgery with or without oral conscious sedation in anxious patients. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18(6):718-722. Silva CO, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum AW, Tatakis DN. Free gingival grafts: graft shrinkage and donor-site healing in smokers and nonsmokers. J Periodontol. 2010;81:692–701. Stellini E, Comuzzi L, Mazzocco F, et al. Relationships between different tooth shapes and patient’s periodontal phenotype. J Periodont Res. 2013;48:657–662. Souza AB, Tormena M, Matarazzo F, Araujo MG. The influence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa on brushing discomfort and periimplant tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:650-655 Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful grafting. Periodontics. 1968;6:5-13. Tan DX, Manchester LC, Reiter RJ, Plummer BF, Limson J, Weintraub ST, Qi W. Melatonin directly scavenges hydrogen peroxide: a potentially new metabolic pathway of melatonin biotransformation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29(11):1177-1185. Tao J, Wu Y, Chen J, Su J. A follow-up study of up to 5 years of metal-ceramic crowns in maxillary central incisors for different gingival biotypes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:e85-e92. Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, et al. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: A consensus report from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl): S52-55. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2021;92:21-44. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):68–81. Thoma DS, Buranawat B, Hammerle CH, Held U, Jung RE. Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(Suppl 15):S77-S91. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E,et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(suppl 15):32–49. Tiihonen J, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Torniainen M, Alexanderson K, Tanskanen A. Mortality and Cumulative Exposure to Antipsychotics, Antidepressants, and Benzodiazepines in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Observational Follow-Up Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(6):600-606. Toubasi AA, Khraisat BR, AbuAnzeh RB, Kalbouneh HM. A cross sectional study: The association between sleeping quality and stress among second and third medical students at the University of Jordan. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2021:912174211011287. Vettore MV, Leão AT, Monteiro Da Silva AM, Quintanilha RS, Lamarca GA. The relationship of stress and anxiety with chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(5):394-402. Wang CW, Yu SH, Mandelaris GA, Wang HL. Is periodontal phenotype modification therapy beneficial for patients receiving orthodontic treatment? An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020;91:299–310. Wang Q, Tang Z, Han J, Meng H. The width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants and its influencing factors. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22:359–365. Wennström JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:1-8. Wikesjö UME., Selvig KA. Periodontal wound healing and regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 1999;19:21–39. Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:9-19. Wilson TD, McNeil DW, Kyle BN, Weaver BD, Graves RW. Effects of conscious sedation on patient recall of anxiety and pain after oral surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(3):277-282. Wimmer G, Köhldorfer G, Mischak I, Lorenzoni M, Kallus KW. Coping with stress: its influence on periodontal therapy. J Periodontol. 2005;76(1):90-98. Yaghobee S, Rouzmeh N, Aslroosta H, Mahmoodi S, Khorsand A, Kharrazifard MJ. Effect of Topical Erythropoietin (EPO) on palatal wound healing subsequent to Free Gingival Grafting (FGG). Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e55. Yi Y, Koo KT, Schwarz F, Ben Amara H, Heo SJ. Association of prosthetic features and peri‐implantitis: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2020;47(3):392-403. Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:387-392. Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41 (Suppl.15): S123-S142.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84385-
dc.description.abstract背景: 軟組織移植手術(Phenotype modification therapy, PMT) 的重要性,在近年來重新受到重視。在自然牙上,有足夠厚度的牙齦,可以幫助病患維持好的口腔衛生,降低發炎指數,更可以避免未來出現牙齦退縮、刷牙磨耗、敏感、不美觀等問題,在人工植體上,好的植體周圍軟組織除了是重建美觀的關鍵因素之一,更是和植體周圍的骨脊穩定度與降低植體周圍炎發生率有相關。此外,過往多篇研究指出,亞洲族群的牙齦形態比西方白人薄,薄的牙齦形態使牙周、假牙、矯正與植體相關治療都變的更加困難,然而,雖然軟組織移植有其重要性,但供給區的併發症像是流血、疼痛等問題,也讓很多病患不願意接受治療,某些病患會選擇服用安眠鎮靜藥物,降低壓力以接受治療。最常使用且被認為效果最佳的軟組織移植手術包含皮下結締組織(Connective tissue graft, CTG)和游離牙齦移植(Free gingival graft, FGG),因兩者有不同的優缺點與組織特性,前者多用於前牙區,後者多用於後牙區。由於自然牙和人工植體周圍的組織形態特性也不相同,因此,本研究針對亞洲族群,觀察與比較有作過皮下結締組織(CTG)與沒有作過CTG的自然牙以及有作過游離牙齦移植(Free gingival graft, FGG)人工植體上,在術後的追蹤時,牙齦厚度、軟組織收縮率、供給區傷口癒合狀況以及植體周圍軟組織立體形態等變化,並且探討可能的影響因子。 材料及方法: 本研究分四部份作資料收集與分析。第一部分為觀察自然牙上接受過皮下結締組織移植後的牙齦厚度變化,實驗總共納入111皮下結締組織移植過的自然牙,與相鄰57個沒有接受移植的自然牙做比較,以牙周探針在牙齦邊緣下方2 mm 的位置,垂直牙齒長軸作量測,並與相關因子如牙齒位置與時間作分析。第二部分為觀察人工植體上進行游離牙齦移植(Free gingival graft, FGG)時,游離牙齦的收縮率以及分析對術後植體周圍角化黏膜的影響,實驗總共納入77隻接受過游離牙齦移植的人工植體,量測手術時游離牙齦的表面積與術後新形成植體周圍角化黏膜的表面積,利用立體數位科技技術作計算,並與相關因子如游離牙齦的大小、植體位置、性別與年紀作分析。第三部分為觀察人工植體上進行游離牙齦移植時,比較有服用與沒有服用安眠鎮靜藥物 (5 mg diazepam)的病患,供給區的傷口癒合狀況,實驗總共納入34位病患,23位術前決定服用藥物,11位則否,以過氧化氫與臨床觀察評估供給區在術後14天的傷口癒合狀況,並使用試管(Salivette)收集手術當天與術後第7天9:00 am 的口水,以酵素免疫分析法分析體內褪黑激素的變化,並且以問卷紀錄病患術前與術後服藥狀況、感受壓力與睡眠品質狀況。第四部分為觀察人工植體在進行游離牙齦移植以及裝置假牙後,植體周圍軟組織的形態與假牙外形間的關係,實驗總共納入53隻植體,在回診時,利用口腔掃描儀(3Shape) 紀錄出3度空間中的植體位置、組織形態與假牙外形,並用數位軟體,測量數值並作統計分析。 結果: 第一部分的實驗顯示亞洲族群的自然牙,平均牙齦厚度為0.96 ± 0.40 mm,經過皮下結締組織移植後,平均牙齦厚度增加為1.99 ± 0.62 mm,此部分有統計上顯著的差異性。在所有有接受皮下結締組織移植的牙齒中,上顎小臼齒的比例最高,接受手術的原因為牙齒高度敏感,希望手術能達到牙根覆蓋以及牙齦組織增厚,降低敏感與未來牙齦退縮的機會。此外,平均牙齦厚度在下顎大臼齒最厚,在下顎前牙最薄,在追蹤的各時期間,平均牙齦厚度沒有統計上的差異性。第二部分的實驗顯示後牙區域的人工植體,在術後平均12.45 ±7.73個月的追蹤,平均游離牙齦的收縮率為24.76 ±14.77 %,平均的植體周圍角化黏膜寬度為4.16 ±1.77 mm。統計分析顯示游離牙齦的面積大小越大,平均收縮率就越高。相關因子如植體位置、性別、年紀則沒有統計上顯著的差異性。第三部分的實驗發現,接受游離牙齦組之移植的病患,在第14天回診時,服用安眠鎮靜藥物的病患中,65.2% 在供給區的傷口已達到完全癒合的狀態,無服用安眠鎮靜藥物的病患中,只有35.7% 在供給區的傷口有達到完全癒合的狀態。有服用藥物的病患,術後褪黑激素相較於無服藥者高。此外,分析在第14天回診時,供給區的傷口就達到完全癒合情況的病患,這些病患術前的褪黑激素相較於無完全癒合的病患高。第四部分的實驗顯示人工植體在進行游離牙齦移植以及裝置假牙後,植體周圍垂直軟組織的高度在頰側為2.65 ± 0.75 mm、在近心側為3.74 ± 1.22 mm,在遠心側為3.16 ± 1.08 mm,在舌側為2.53 ± 0.92 mm。植體周圍水平軟組織的厚度在頰側為1.45 ± 0.53 mm,在舌側為1.05 ± 0.43 mm (P= 0.008)。在頰側的假牙萌出角度(emergence angle, EA)為EA>30時,相較於為EA30的假牙,植體周圍垂直軟組織的高度較小且水平軟組織的厚度較大。在鄰接面的假牙萌出角度為EA30時,相較於為EA30的假牙,有較多的骨脊喪失。平均的植體周圍角化黏膜寬度為4.08 ±1.10 mm。 結論: 本研究發現皮下結締組織移植手術是一個有效調整軟組織形態的治療方式,在亞洲族群中,接受移植後,平均可達將近2 mm 的牙齦厚度,並且在近3年的追蹤期間,表現都很穩定。研究中的量化數值可以提醒臨床醫師有時需要將軟組織移植手術納入假牙與矯正的治療中,以達到最佳的整體治療效果。此外,本實驗也發現游離牙齦移植手術也是一個有效調整軟組織形態的治療方式,只要有移植足夠大小的游離牙齦,後牙的人工植體在假牙裝置後,仍是有理想的角化黏膜寬度與立體空間上的軟組織形態。同時,我們也發現給予病患短期服用安眠鎮靜藥物,可以維持術後褪黑激素的濃度,促進供給區的傷口癒合,以及可以鼓勵病患接受軟組織移植手術。最後,建議人工植體的假牙製作,萌出角度應30,可以保留最多垂直軟組織厚度與維持骨脊的穩定度。綜合以上結果,軟組織移植手術(PMT)包含皮下結締組織移植(CTG)與游離牙齦移植(FGG)皆可以成功改變自然牙與植體周圍的組織形態,增進牙周組織的健康與穩定性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground/Purpose: The importance of phenotype modification therapy (PMT) around teeth and implants has been emphasized recently. It has been reported that a thick gingival phenotype has less gingival recession and better surgical and restorative treatment outcomes than a thin phenotype. Similarly, it has been noted that a thick peri-implant phenotype has crestal bone stability and better esthetics compared with a thin one. However, most Asian people display a thin gingival phenotype and literature regarding the amount of achieved gingival thickness after PMT is scarce, especially for the Asian population. Moreover, data on the shrinkage of soft tissue grafts vary in the literature and there has been little discussion about the influence of restorative treatments on keratinized mucosa width (KMW). In addition, donor site morbidity has always been a concern for patients and clinicians. Therefore, the objectives of this research are as follows: to analyze post-surgical gingival thickness around natural teeth after receiving a connective tissue graft (CTG) in the Asian population; to assess its tissue stability; to assess the dimensional changes of a free gingival graft (FGG) in posterior implants and their influencing factors; to analyze the rate of palatal wound healing following FGG procedures in patients taking a sedative medicine for 8 days; to analyze the tissue morphology around implant-supported prostheses by digital technology; and to evaluate the effect of prosthetic contours on the changes in tissue following FGG procedures.  Materials and methods: This research consists of 4 parts. In the first part of this study, 28 Asian patients who had undergone CTG surgery were recruited. In total, 111 grafted teeth and 57 nearby nongrafted teeth were selected. Gingival thickness was measured by transgingival probing, at the level of 2 mm below the mid-buccal gingival margin. The mean tissue thickness of the grafted teeth was compared to adjacent nongrafted teeth in the same individuals and the thickness in different tooth types was calculated. The gingival thickness of the grafted teeth was statistically analyzed after various time intervals. In the second part of the study, a total of 77 implants in 40 patients who had undergone FGG procedures were examined. Graft sizes during surgery and the surface areas of keratinized mucosa in the follow-up visit after restorations were compared by digital analysis, and verified by clinical measurement and photographs. The association between shrinkage and its related factors, such as graft sizes, implant location, sex and the age of the patients was evaluated. The influence of the shrinkage of FGG on the KMW following restorations was analyzed and discussed. In the third part of the study, a total of 40 FGG procedures on 58 implants and 6 teeth in 34 patients were included. Twenty-three patients decided to take a sedative medication and the rest served as a control group. The only difference between the two groups is the sedative medication, 5 mg diazepam, starting from the night before surgery. Direct examination, photographs and H2O2 were used to evaluate the healing rate by assessing the amount of wound epithelialization on day 14. Saliva samples were collected around 9:00 am on Day 0 and Day 7 to assess the melatonin level. Self-report questionnaires were filled in to record the times of taking the medicine. In the fourth part of the study, a total of 53 implants which had previously presented insufficient KMW and received FGGs were selected. At the follow-up visits, the implant position and tissue condition were documented with an oral scanner. The VT, HT and emergence angle (EA) of the prostheses were assessed by 3Shape analyzing software. The final KMW was measured by clinical assessment. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was calculated in the follow-up bitewing radiographs. Results: In the first part, the average gingival thickness after a CTG is 1.99 ± 0.62 mm compared to 0.96 ± 0.40 mm with nongrafted teeth, regardless of tooth type. A statistically significant difference was seen in gingival thickness between grafted and nongrafted teeth. The maxillary premolar is the tooth type that underwent CTG surgery most frequently in our study. The main reasons for this procedure were to obtain root coverage to reduce hypersensitivity and gingival augmentation to prevent future recession. Following connective tissue grafting for various clinical scenarios, mandibular molars showed the thickest gingival tissues whereas mandibular incisors presented the thinnest tissues. No statistically significant difference in the mean tissue thickness at different time intervals was observed. In the second part, the overall shrinkage of FGG around implants in posterior regions was 24.76 ± 14.77% and the average KMW was 4.16 ± 1.77 mm in the follow-up visit. Statistical analysis showed that the larger the graft, the higher the shrinkage ratio. No statistically significant difference regarding the effect of implant location, sex and age on the shrinkage of FGG and final KMW was found. The mean follow-up period after restorations was 12.45 ± 7.73 months. In the third part, 65.2% of the patients with diazepam demonstrated complete epithelialization on palatal wounds on Day 14, whereas only 35.7% in the control group presented complete wound healing. Individuals with diazepam had higher levels of post-operative melatonin in comparison with subjects who did not. Groups with complete epithelialization by Day 14 tended to present higher levels of pre-operative melatonin than those without. In the fourth part, the mean VT was 2.65 ± 0.75 mm at the mid-buccal sites, 3.74 ± 1.22 mm at the mesial, 3.16 ± 1.08 mm at the distal, and 2.53 ± 0.92 at the mid-lingual aspects. The mid-buccal HT was 1.45 ± 0.53 mm while the mid-lingual was 1.05 ± 0.43 mm (P= 0.008). Interestingly, prostheses with mid-buccal EA30 exhibited slightly lower VT, but higher HT, than the ones with EA 30. Prostheses with proximal EA30 displayed slightly more MBL, compared to prostheses with EA 30. The mean KMW was 4.08 ± 1.10 mm. Conclusion Firstly, CTG surgery is a predictable treatment modality around natural teeth, even in Asians, achieving nearly 2 mm of gingival thickness on average, post-operation. Tissue stability after CTG has been presented in our study in the follow-up visit up to 3.5 years. This quantitative assessment of the gingival thickness in Asians may encourage clinicians to deal with soft tissue architecture ahead of main surgical, restorative and orthodontic treatments in order to achieve the best overall treatment outcomes. Secondly, FGG surgery is a predictable treatment approach around dental implants because ideal KMW and 3-dimensional soft tissues in the posterior regions can be augmented after the fabrication of prostheses, as long as a sufficient amount of grafts is utilized. Thirdly, short-term sedative medications may encourage patients to receive the required soft tissue grafting and facilitate wound healing by means of maintaining postoperative melatonin levels. Lastly, prostheses with EA 30 were preferable for preserving the maximal VT and maintaining crestal bone stability. Overall, phenotype modification therapy including CTG and FGG can successfully convert the thin into thick phenotypes 3-dimensionally around natural teeth and implants for their long-term health and stability.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:09:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1703202220314300.pdf: 3245782 bytes, checksum: e2ce3031889cbde0d45c8a69a5904b81 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………………... i 謝誌………………………………………………………………………………….. ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. iii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………… .viii Table Index xvii Figure Index xviii I. Introduction 1 1.1 Significance of soft tissues around natural teeth 1 1.2 Significance of soft tissues around dental implants 3 1.3 Differences between natural teeth and dental implants 5 1.4 Phenotype modification therapy 8 1.5 Current unsolved issues and research goals 9 II. Materials and methods 11 Part I: Tissue thickness after connective tissue grafting around natural teeth 11 2.1.1 Patient population and study design 11 2.1.2 Clinical measurements 12 2.1.3 Data analysis 13 Part II: Graft shrinkage after free gingival grafting around dental implants 13 2.2.1 Patient population and study design 13 2.2.2 Surgical procedures 14 2.2.3 Data collection 16 2.2.4 Statistical analysis 17 Part III: Wound healing at palatal donor sites 19 2.3.1 Patient population and study design 19 2.3.2 Preoperative protocol and surgical procedures 20 2.3.3 Postoperative protocol and clinical assessments 22 2.3.4 Measurement of salivary melatonin levels 25 2.3.5 Data analysis 25 Part IV: Tissue morphology after free gingival grafting around dental implants 26 2.4.1 Participants and study design 26 2.4.2 Surgical and restorative procedures 27 2.4.3 Data collection and assessment method 28 2.4.4 Statistical analysis 30 III. Results 30 Part I: Tissue thickness after connective tissue grafting around natural teeth 30 Part II: Graft shrinkage after free gingival grafting around dental implants 31 Part III: Wound healing at palatal donor sites 32 3.3.1 Patient-centered outcomes 33 3.3.2 Clinical outcomes 34 3.3.3 Laboratory outcomes 34 Part IV: Tissue morphology after free gingival grafting around dental implants 35 IV. Discussion 36 Part I: Tissue thickness after connective tissue grafting around natural teeth 36 4.1.1 Methods of assessing periodontal phenotype 36 4.1.2 Significance of thick phenotype 37 4.1.4 Differences between Asians and Caucasians 39 4.1.5 Clinical application of CTG 41 4.1.6 Limitations 42 Part II: Graft shrinkage after free gingival grafting around dental implants 43 4.2.2 The effect of implant location on graft shrinkage 44 4.2.3 The effect of graft size on graft shrinkage 45 4.2.4 The effect of age on graft shrinkage 46 Part III: Wound healing at palatal donor sites 48 4.3.1 Relationships between stress and periodontal diseases 48 4.3.2 Relationships between stress and wound healing 49 4.3.3 Strategies to facilitate palatal wound healing 51 4.3.4 Faster wound healing in medication groups 53 4.3.5 Relationships between melatonin and wound healing 55 4.3.6 Potentials of sedative medications in dentistry 56 4.3.7 Limitations 57 Part IV: Tissue morphology after free gingival grafting around dental implants 59 4.4.1 The effect of prostheses on tissue morphology after grafting 59 4.4.2 Ideal and resulting 3D soft tissue architecture 61 4.4.2 Relationships between emergence angle (EA) and tissue morphology 63 4.4.2 Limitations 66 V. Conclusion 67 VI. Tables 69 VII. Figures 78 VIII. References 86 IX. Appendix 103 A: Curriculum Vitae 103 B1: Publication in Dissertation 105 B2: Other Publication related to Dissertation 105 B3: Publication (2016- 2022) 105
dc.language.isoen
dc.title亞洲族群中的自然牙和人工植牙在軟組織移植後的組織形態變化zh_TW
dc.titleChanges in soft tissues around natural teeth and dental implants following phenotype modification therapies in an Asian populationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.author-orcid0000-0001-7856-8585
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee呂炫堃(Hsein-Kun Lu),傅明仁(Martin Fu),張瑞青(Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang),陳漪紋(Yi-Wen Chen)
dc.subject.keyword軟組織移植,皮下結締組織移植,游離牙齦移植,牙齦厚度,收縮率,傷口癒合,褪黑激素,角化黏膜寬度,垂直軟組織厚度,骨脊穩定度,萌出角度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSoft tissue graft,connective tissue graft,free gingival graft,gingival thickness,shrinkage,wound healing,melatonin,keratinized mucosa width,vertical soft tissue thickness,crestal bone stability,emergence angle,en
dc.relation.page106
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200640
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-03-21
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床牙醫學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-03-24-
顯示於系所單位:臨床牙醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1703202220314300.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
3.17 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved