請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84359完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 董鈺琪(Yu-Chi Tung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Ting Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳春廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:09:22Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-05-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-05-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report. Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports 2.Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 04 11 2020;395(10231):1225-1228. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9 3.Meares HD, Jones MP. When a system breaks: queueing theory model of intensive care bed needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med J Aust. 06 2020;212(10):470-471. doi:10.5694/mja2.50605 4.Schull MJ, Guttmann A, Leaver CA, et al. Prioritizing performance measurement for emergency department care: consensus on evidence-based quality of care indicators. CJEM. Sep 2011;13(5):300-9, E28-43. doi:10.2310/8000.2011.110334 5.Lindsay P, Schull M, Bronskill S, Anderson G. The development of indicators to measure the quality of clinical care in emergency departments following a modified-delphi approach. Acad Emerg Med. Nov 2002;9(11):1131-9. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01567.x 6.Cheng SY, Wang HT, Lee CW, Tsai TC, Hung CW, Wu KH. The characteristics and prognostic predictors of unplanned hospital admission within 72 hours after ED discharge. Am J Emerg Med. Oct 2013;31(10):1490-4. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.004 7.Nuñez S, Hexdall A, Aguirre-Jaime A. Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: an outcome of medical errors? Qual Saf Health Care. Apr 2006;15(2):102-8. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016618 8.Rising KL, Padrez KA, O'Brien M, Hollander JE, Carr BG, Shea JA. Return visits to the emergency department: the patient perspective. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2015;65(4):377-386.e3. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.015 9.Horney C, Schmader K, Sanders LL, et al. Health care utilization before and after an outpatient ED visit in older people. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2012;30(1):135-42. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.036 10.Chen CT, Lin JW, Wu CH, et al. A Simple Risk Score for Predicting Neurologic Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients After Targeted Temperature Management. Crit Care Med. Sep 08 2021;doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005266 11.Mantica G, Riccardi N, Terrone C, Gratarola A. Non-COVID-19 visits to emergency departments during the pandemic: the impact of fear. Public Health. 06 2020;183:40-41. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.046 12.Boscarino J, Steiber SR. Hospital shopping and consumer choice. J Health Care Mark. 1982;2(2):15-23. 13.Gwin M, Saleki M, Lampert H, Meo N, Bann M. Emergency department visits and readmissions after COVID-19 hospitalization: a cross-sectional analysis. Intern Emerg Med. 09 2021;16(6):1715-1718. doi:10.1007/s11739-021-02644-9 14.Venkat A, Asher SL, Wolf L, et al. Ethical issues in the response to Ebola virus disease in United States emergency departments: a position paper of the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Emergency Nurses Association, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. May 2015;22(5):605-15. doi:10.1111/acem.12642 15.Garcia-Castrillo L, Petrino R, Leach R, et al. European Society For Emergency Medicine position paper on emergency medical systems' response to COVID-19. Eur J Emerg Med. Jun 2020;27(3):174-177. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000701 16.Freund Y. The challenge of emergency medicine facing the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Emerg Med. 06 2020;27(3):155. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000699 17.Mustard CA, Kozyrskyj AL, Barer ML, Sheps S. Emergency department use as a component of total ambulatory care: a population perspective. CMAJ. Jan 13 1998;158(1):49-55. 18.莊逸洲、黃崇哲，醫院功能與管理-門診、急診、住院，華杏出版社，台北，民國九十四年。 19.胡勝川，「急診醫學今日與未來」，台灣醫界，第四十卷第一期，57-58頁，民國八十六年。 20.丁修文，「急診醫療結果面品質影響因素之探討-以某區域教學醫院兒科氣喘病患為例」，國立中山大學，碩士論文，民國九十三年。 21.Kazandjian VA, Lawthers J, Cernak CM, Pipesh FC. Relating outcomes to processes of care: the Maryland Hospital Association's Quality Indicator Project (QI Project). Jt Comm J Qual Improv. Nov 1993;19(11):530-8. doi:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30034-7 22.財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會-簡介。 Available at https://www.jct.org.tw/cp-21-1155-4a85d-1.html 23.Safwenberg U, Terént A, Lind L. Increased long-term mortality in patients with repeated visits to the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. Oct 2010;17(5):274-9. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283104106 24.Keith KD, Bocka JJ, Kobernick MS, Krome RL, Ross MA. Emergency department revisits. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 1989;18(9):964-8. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80461-5 25.Abualenain J, Frohna WJ, Smith M, et al. The prevalence of quality issues and adverse outcomes among 72-hour return admissions in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. Aug 2013;45(2):281-8. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.012 26.Lerman B, Kobernick MS. Return visits to the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1987 Sep-Oct 1987;5(5):359-62. doi:10.1016/0736-4679(87)90138-7 27.Hayward J, Hagtvedt R, Ma W, Gauri A, Vester M, Holroyd BR. Predictors of Admission in Adult Unscheduled Return Visits to the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 11 2018;19(6):912-918. doi:10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38225 28.Sabbatini AK, Kocher KE, Basu A, Hsia RY. In-Hospital Outcomes and Costs Among Patients Hospitalized During a Return Visit to the Emergency Department. JAMA. Feb 16 2016;315(7):663-71. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0649 29.Sung CW, Lu TC, Fang CC, et al. Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study. Eur J Emerg Med. Oct 01 2021;28(5):394-401. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000851 30.Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi:10.1001/jama.260.12.1743 31.Sheikh S. Risk Factors Associated with Emergency Department Recidivism in the Older Adult. West J Emerg Med. Oct 14 2019;20(6):931-938. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.7.43073 32.Tangkulpanich P, Yuksen C, Kongchok W, Jenpanitpong C. Clinical Predictors of Emergency Department Revisits within 48 Hours of Discharge; a Case Control Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e1. 33.Montoy JCC, Tamayo-Sarver J, Miller GA, Baer AE, Peabody CR. Predicting Emergency Department 'Bouncebacks': A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. West J Emerg Med. Oct 16 2019;20(6):865-874. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.8.43221 34.Graff L, Mucci D, Radford MJ. Decision to hospitalize: objective diagnosis-related group criteria versus clinical judgment. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 1988;17(9):943-52. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80677-2 35.Rusnak RA, Stair TO, Hansen K, Fastow JS. Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. Oct 1989;18(10):1029-34. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80924-2 36.Goleman D. The emotionally competent leader. Healthc Forum J. 1998 Mar-Apr 1998;41(2):36, 38, 76. 37.Hu SC. Analysis of patient revisits to the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. Jul 1992;10(4):366-70. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(92)90022-p 38.Kelly AM, Chirnside AM, Curry CH. An analysis of unscheduled return visits to an urban emergency department. N Z Med J. Aug 11 1993;106(961):334-6. 39.Pierce JM, Kellerman AL, Oster C. 'Bounces': an analysis of short-term return visits to a public hospital emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. Jul 1990;19(7):752-7. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81698-1 40.Aaronson E, Borczuk P, Benzer T, Mort E, Temin E. 72h returns: A trigger tool for diagnostic error. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 2018;36(3):359-361. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.019 41.Rising KL, Victor TW, Hollander JE, Carr BG. Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve. Acad Emerg Med. Aug 2014;21(8):864-71. doi:10.1111/acem.12442 42.Pham JC, Kirsch TD, Hill PM, DeRuggerio K, Hoffmann B. Seventy-two-hour returns may not be a good indicator of safety in the emergency department: a national study. Acad Emerg Med. Apr 2011;18(4):390-7. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01042.x 43.Jeffery MM, D'Onofrio G, Paek H, et al. Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Admissions in Health Care Systems in 5 States in the First Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 10 01 2020;180(10):1328-1333. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3288 44.Lucero AD, Lee A, Hyun J, et al. Underutilization of the Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic. West J Emerg Med. Sep 24 2020;21(6):15-23. doi:10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48632 45.Wongtanasarasin W, Srisawang T, Yothiya W, Phinyo P. Impact of national lockdown towards emergency department visits and admission rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: A hospital-based study. Emerg Med Australas. 04 2021;33(2):316-323. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.13666 46.Wai AKC, Wong CKH, Wong JYH, et al. Changes in Emergency Department Visits, Diagnostic Groups, and 28-Day Mortality Associated With the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Territory-Wide, Retrospective, Cohort Study. Ann Emerg Med. Sep 24 2021;doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.424 47.Wu J, Mamas M, Rashid M, et al. Patient response, treatments, and mortality for acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 05 03 2021;7(3):238-246. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa062 48.de Havenon A, Ney JP, Callaghan B, Yaghi S, Majersik JJ. Excess neurological death in New York City after the emergence of COVID-19. J Neurol. Jun 2021;268(6):2026-2028. doi:10.1007/s00415-020-10084-2 49.Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, DeVies J, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jun 12 2020;69(23):699-704. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1 50.Powell ES, Khare RK, Courtney DM, Feinglass J. Volume of emergency department admissions for sepsis is related to inpatient mortality: results of a nationwide cross-sectional analysis. Crit Care Med. Nov 2010;38(11):2161-8. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f3e09c 51.Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. Apr 11 2002;346(15):1128-37. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa012337 52.Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. Jun 1987;22(2):157-82. 53.Wu CL, Wang FT, Chiang YC, et al. Unplanned emergency department revisits within 72 hours to a secondary teaching referral hospital in Taiwan. J Emerg Med. May 2010;38(4):512-7. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.039 54.Liaw SJ, Bullard MJ, Hu PM, Chen JC, Liao HC. Rates and causes of emergency department revisits within 72 hours. J Formos Med Assoc. Jun 1999;98(6):422-5. 55.Hsia RY, Asch SM, Weiss RE, et al. Is emergency department crowding associated with increased 'bounceback' admissions? Med Care. Nov 2013;51(11):1008-14. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a98310 56.Sanchez M, Smally AJ, Grant RJ, Jacobs LM. Effects of a fast-track area on emergency department performance. J Emerg Med. Jul 2006;31(1):117-20. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.08.019 57.Sri-On J, Nithimathachoke A, Tirrell GP, Surawongwattana S, Liu SW. Revisits within 48 Hours to a Thai Emergency Department. Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:8983573. doi:10.1155/2016/8983573 58.Stella F, Alexopoulos C, Scquizzato T, Zorzi A. Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on emergency medical system missions and emergency department visits in the Venice area. Eur J Emerg Med. 08 2020;27(4):298-300. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000724 59.Austad SN. Why women live longer than men: sex differences in longevity. Gend Med. Jun 2006;3(2):79-92. doi:10.1016/s1550-8579(06)80198-1 60.Tung YC, Chang GM, Cheng SH. Long-term effect of fee-for-service-based reimbursement cuts on processes and outcomes of care for stroke: interrupted time-series study from Taiwan. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Jan 2015;8(1):30-7. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001086 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84359 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景：急診病患的近期返診一直以來都被視為維持急診醫療服務質量、工作效率和確保患者安全的一項基準。然而，自從2019年年底新冠病毒 (COVID-19)爆發以來，疫情不但肆虐著了全球的衛生系統，更是對各地急診的服務品質產生了前所未有的衝擊。 研究目的：我們試圖調查COVID-19疫情前後急診返診的病患是否存在特性與樣態上的差異。此外，我們也想進一步檢視COVID-19 疫情的流行是否會是導致急診返診病患預後不佳的決定因素。 研究方法：本研究為一項回溯性研究，我們比較COVID-19疫情前後的72小時急診返診病患的特性與樣態。我們以2020年2月至2020年6月COVID-19疫情流行後急診72小時返診的患者作為我們的研究組，而對照組則為2019年2月至2019年6月急診72小時返診的患者。關於患者的預後，我們分析了包含返診住院、返診入住加護病房、到院前心臟驟停返診以及住院後的院內死亡率等。我們使用單變項和多變項羅吉斯迴歸模型來檢定急診72小時返診病患預後的獨立預測因子。 研究結果：本研究共收案1786例急診就醫人次，其中研究組765例，對照組1021例。結果發現：研究組的患者較為年輕（53.9±22.5 vs 56.1±28.0，p=0.002），女性比例較高（66.1% vs. 47.3%，p<0.001），返診時檢傷級別升級的比例較少（11.6% vs. 15.0%，p=0.041）。兩組在返診後住院需求、入住加護病房需求或到院前心臟驟停返診這幾項預後上沒有顯著差異，但研究組的住院死亡率上升已接近統計學上臨界值差異。在羅吉斯迴歸模型中，COVID-19疫情流行與院內死亡率存在顯著相關（調整後的優勢比為2.289，95%信賴區間1.059–4.948，p=0.035）。 結論：我們發現72小時急診返診病患於COVID-19疫情流行前後，確實存在人口統計學上的特性差異，以及有臨床就醫樣態上的不同。更重要的是， COVID-19疫情的流行是急診72小時返診病患的後續住院死亡的獨立預測因子。未來在急診的醫療服務上，應考慮將大規模的傳染病流行，視為急診72小時返診病患預後不佳的危險因素之一。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Emergency department (ED) short-term revisit has been used as a benchmark to improve the health care quality of services, work efficiency, and to ensure patient safety. However, the outbreak of COVID-19 challenges the global health system and specifically impacts the EDs. Objective: We sought to investigate whether discrepancy existed among ED revisiting cases before-and-after COVID-19 epidemic and also determine whether COVID-19 epidemic was a predictor for poor outcomes of ED revisits. Methods: This was a retrospective study comparing the subjects with 72-hour ED revisit before-and-after COVID-19 epidemic. Patients with 72-hour ED revisit after COVID-19 epidemic were collected from February 2020 through June 2020 as our study group, while control group from February 2019 through June 2019. The investigated outcomes included hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and subsequent in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors for outcomes of 72-hour ED revisit. Results: A total of 1786 patients were enrolled in our study, with 765 in study group and 1021 in control group. Patients in study group were younger (53.9±22.5 vs 56.1±28.0, p=0.002), more likely to be female (66.1% vs. 47.3%, p<0.001), and less escalation of triage level when revisiting (11.6% vs 15.0%, p=0.041). There was no significant difference in outcomes of hospital admission, ICU admission or revisit with OHCA between the two groups but borderline higher in-hospital mortality in study group. In logistic regression model, COVID-19 epidemic was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.289, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.059–4.948, p=0.035). Conclusions: Distinct demographic and clinical patterns of 72-hour ED revisits existed before-and-after COVID-19 epidemic and COVID-19 epidemic was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality of 72-hour ED revisits. Large-scale contagious disease should be taken into consideration as one of the risk factors for poor outcome of 72-hour ED revisits. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:09:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1105202213350000.pdf: 1361307 bytes, checksum: 30672eb3f2e5db3d57622a3fdafb9ec7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 I ABSTRACT III 目 錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第貳章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 新冠病毒疫情影響下的醫療服務 4 第二節 急診醫學與品質指標 5 第三節 急診近期返診指標 7 第四節 急診返診病患預後的重要性 8 第五節 急診返診病患預後的影響因素 9 第參章 研究設計與方法 12 第一節 研究設計與架構 12 第二節 研究假說 18 第三節 研究對象 18 第四節 資料來源與處理流程 18 第五節 研究變項與操作型定義 21 第六節 統計分析方法 25 第肆章 研究結果 26 第一節 研究組與對照組之基本特性與樣態比較 26 第二節 研究組與對照組之預後分析比較 32 第三節 急診返診病患預後之影響因子（多變量分析） 34 第四節 研究結果小節 41 第伍章 討論 42 第一節 新冠病毒疫情下的急診照護品質 42 第二節 新冠病毒疫情對急診返診病患預後的影響 43 第三節 新冠病毒疫情影響下急診返診病患特性的變化 45 第四節 影響急診返診病患的預後的相關決定因素 45 第五節 研究限制 47 第陸章 結論與建議 48 第一節 結論 48 第二節 建議 49 參考文獻 52 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 急診返診預後 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新型冠狀病毒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 急診近期返診 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 急診醫療品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | healthcare quality | en |
| dc.subject | quality measure | en |
| dc.subject | metrics | en |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | emergency department revisit | en |
| dc.subject | epidemic | en |
| dc.title | 新冠病毒疫情對急診近期返診患者預後的影響-以台北市某醫學中心為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of COVID-19 on the Outcomes of Patients with Short-Term Emergency Department Revisit | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭年真(Nien-Chen Kuo),顏鴻章(David Hung-Tsang Yen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 新型冠狀病毒,急診近期返診,急診醫療品質,急診返診預後, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | COVID-19,emergency department revisit,epidemic,healthcare quality,metrics,quality measure, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 57 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200760 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-05-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-05-26 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1105202213350000.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。