請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84311完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖咸興(Hsien-Hsing Liao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Ju Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林宛儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:08:18Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-06-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | (一)中文參考資料 王韻怡、池祥萱、周冠男(2016)。行為財務學文獻回顧與展望:臺灣市場之研究。經濟論文叢刊,44(1),1-55。 江彥節(2005)。股價波動與股東結構關係之探討-臺灣50指數成份股的實證研究。世新大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,1-68。 李昌峻、葉昶辰(2019)。再探臺灣市場之規模溢酬實證研究。貨幣觀測與信用評等,140,56-67。 (2007)。股市之價值溢酬及多因子模型之探討-以臺灣股票市場為例。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所學位論文,1-47。 林煜恩、池祥萱(2013)。媒體曝光度、前期績效對基金投資人決策的影響。管理學報,30(2),147-168。 許光華、林秉瑋(2005)。散戶投資人處分效果之研究-考量公司市場價值下之實證結果。管理學報,22(1),85–107。 許哲瑋(2010)。Fama and French三因子模型與財務指標對股票報酬之影響---以臺灣上市電子公司為例。臺北大學企業管理學系學位論文,1-60。 許致德(2012)。簡介認購(售)權證流動量提供者機制。證券暨期貨月刊,30(1),5-16。 鄧學修(2010)。股票面額制度問題之探討。經濟研究年刊,10,143-161。 劉憶如(2004)。外資在臺灣證券交易市場角色之研究。臺灣證券交易所委託之研究。台北:臺灣證券交易所。 劉永欽、洪榮華(2006)。過度自信與股市交易行爲關聯性之實證研究-以國內證券商爲例。中山管理評論,14(3),569 – 603。 劉程睿(2008)。週轉率、成交量波動率和股價波動率之關聯性分析。淡江大學管理科學研究所學位論文,1-61。 蔡清慧(2019)。效率與股票報酬關聯-Fama and French多因子模型應用。國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所學位論文,1-32。 謝金山、陳維新(2016)。臺灣證交所個股成交量與價格波動性、報酬率關係之實證研究。管理資訊計算,5(1),169-180。 (二)英文參考資料 Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J.T. & Nikolaev, V.(2016). Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(1), 28-45. Banz, R. W.(1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18. Barber, B. M., Odean, T.(2000). Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773-806. Chan, L. K. C., Karceski, J. & Lakonishok, J.(2003). The Level and Persistence of Growth Rates. The Journal of Finance, 58(2), 643-684. Dang, C., Li, Z.(Frank)& Yang, C.(2018). Measuring Firm Size in Empirical Corporate Finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86(C), 169-176. Fama, E. F.(1970). Efficient Capital Markets:A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465. Fama, E. F. & French, K.R.(1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. Foucault, T., Sraer, D. & Thesmar, D. J.(2011). Individual Investors and Volatility. The Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1369-1406. Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data.:Cambridge University Press. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-292. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W.(1994). Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578. La Porta, R.(1996). Expectations and the Cross-Section of Stock Return. The Journal of Finance,51(5), 1715-1742. La Porta, R., Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.(1997). Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 859-887. Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. J.(1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk &Uncertainty,1(1), 7-59. Shefrin, H. & Statman, M.(1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence, The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790. Shefrin, H. & Thaler, R. H.(1988). The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609-643. Shefrin, H.(2002). Beyond Greed and Fear:Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing.:Oxford University Press. Shleifer, A.(2000). Inefficient Markets:An Introduction to Behavioral Finance.:Oxford University Press. Shue, K. & Townsend, R.(2021). Can the Market Multiply and Divide? Non-Proportional Thinking in Financial Markets. The Journal of Finance, 76(5), 2307-2357. Siegel, J. J. (1998). Stocks for the Long Run. United States:McGraw-Hill. Simon, H. A.(1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review 63(2), 129-138. Simon, H. A.(1987). Rationality as Process and Product of Thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), 1-16. Simon, H. A.(1990). A Mechanism for Social Selection and Successful Altruism. Science, 250 (4988), 1665-1668. Subrahmanyam, A.(2008). Behavioural Finance:A Review and Synthesis. European Financial Management, 14(1), 12-29. (三)網路參考資料 沈盈妤、黃勢璋(2021)。當沖交易減半課稅對股票市場影響之初探。台灣新社會智庫政策報告網頁(2021年12月6日)。檢自:http://www.taiwansig.tw/index.php/%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F/8827-%E7%95%B6%E6%B2%96%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E6%B8%9B%E5%8D%8A%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%85%E5%B0%8D%E8%82%A1%E7%A5%A8%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E4%B9%8B%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2#:~:text=%E7%95%B6%E6%97%A5%E6%B2%96%E9%8A%B7%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E6%B8%9B%E5%8D%8A,%E6%9C%89%E5%BE%85%E9%80%B2%E4%B8%80%E6%AD%A5%E9%A9%97%E8%AD%89%E8%88%87%E8%A8%8E%E8%AB%96%E3%80%82 (May 20, 2022) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84311 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 投資人若非完全理性,可能因採用捷思法簡化消息面對股價衝擊之評估流程,以絕對金額衡量衝擊程度,而未考慮應依照股價對絕對金額進行等比例調整,產生「非比例性思考」之現象。因此,將產生低價股之股票報酬波動率較高價股大之現象,亦即股價對股票報酬波動率產生非比例性之影響。 本文採用臺股集中市場自1971年1月5日至2021年12月30日的日交易資料進行分析,在控制公司規模之代理變數後,發現股價與股票報酬波動率間確實存在前述非比例性影響之關係。本文亦加入公司內部人及外部大股東持股比進行分析,發現該變數確實可降低股票報酬波動度,顯示前述投資人之交易行為可穩定股價;但即使將該變數納入控制,股價與股票報酬率呈反比之關係仍舊顯著,顯示公司內部人及外部大股東仍受非比例性思考之影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Under the assumption that investors are not fully rational, when investors are aware of the news that would cause stock price to change, they would apply heuristics to the evaluation of stock price. Therefore, they evaluate the stock price shock in dollar instead of percentage units. The phenomenon is call “non-proportional thinking” since the investors fail to adjust the price shock in proportion to the price level. Therefore, the return volatilities of stocks of lower price level would tend to be larger than that of higher price level; in other words, stock prices would cause non-proportional relationship between the stock prices and the stock return volatilities. The study uses the stock daily trading data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation from Jan.5, 1971 to Dec.30, 2021 as research sample. Evidence shows that after controlling the proxies of firm size, stock prices and stock return volatilities are in negative correlation, which proves that the non-proportional thinking exists in Taiwan stock market. The ownership of the insiders and external major stockholders are in negative correlation with stock return volatilities, which shows that the above investors serve as price stabilizers in the market. However, after controlling the ownership of the insiders and external major stockholders, stock prices and stock return volatilities are still in negative correlation, showing that above investors are still prone to non-proportional thinking. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:08:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0606202211351900.pdf: 2306766 bytes, checksum: a9f6df878aa83c5a1130324fc2173f77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 第一章:前言與概述 1 第二章、文獻回顧 4 第三章、研究假說 7 第四章、研究樣本與研究方法 9 第五章、實證結果 14 六、研究結果之啟發 25 七、結論與建議 29 八、參考資料 30 (一)中文參考資料 30 (二)英文參考資料 31 (三)網路參考資料 33 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 捷思法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非比例性思考 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股價 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股票報酬波動度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股票分割 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | stock spilt | en |
| dc.subject | heuristics | en |
| dc.subject | non-proportional thinking | en |
| dc.subject | stock price | en |
| dc.subject | stock return volatility | en |
| dc.title | 股價對股票報酬波動率之非比例性影響–以臺灣市場為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Non-proportional Relationship between the Stock Prices and the Stock Return Volatilities-Evidence from Taiwan Stock Market | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳宗岡(Tsung-Kang Chen),郭慧如(Hui-Ju Kuo) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 捷思法,非比例性思考,股價,股票報酬波動度,股票分割, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | heuristics,non-proportional thinking,stock price,stock return volatility,stock spilt, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 33 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202200869 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-06-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0606202211351900.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
