Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84306
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor廖珮真(Pei-Cheng Liao)
dc.contributor.authorHau Yangen
dc.contributor.author楊浩zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:08:12Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-05
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-06-09
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻 方螢基,1990,企業合併策略對營運及績效影響之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 毛郁芬,2010,企業併購消息宣告與股價累積平均異常報酬率之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 王祝三、周德瑋、陳弘榮,2006,企業併購支付方式決定因素與股價反應之探討,證券市場發展季刊,18(3),1-45。 王朝義,2017,影響併購後股市異常報酬因素之研究:以台灣上市、上櫃公司為例,企業管理學報,112,99-116。 古永嘉、胡珮高,2008,台灣企業併購付款方式之選擇,輔仁管理評論,15(3), 97-126。 吳安妮,1992,台灣企業併購動機之實證研究,管理評論 11 卷,1-27。 吳美瑢,2015,合併商譽與支付方式對併購後股東財富之影響,成功大學財務金融研究所碩士在職專班學位論文。 吳茵,2009,溢價與支付方式對併購後績效之影響,臺灣大學會計學研究所學位論文。 呂佳玲、林基煌,2008,家族企業公司治理、併購策略與績效之探討,太經濟管理評論,11(2),107-134。 林淑禎,2007,企業併購支付方式的影響因素-從併購法令變更後探討,淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士在職專班學位論文。 林嬋娟、吳安妮,1992,台灣企業併購綜效及績效之實證研究,會計評論,26,1-23。 林聰哲,1989,財務績效對企業合併經營決策影響之研究,私立東吳大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 倪鈺茹,2007,企業併購與經營績效之研究:以EVA與FCF為衡量指標,私立中原大學會計學系碩士論文。 孫梅瑞、陳隆麒,2002,國內上市公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究,中山管理評論,10(1),155-184。 張紹基、楊勝淵,2001,台灣企業購併實質效益之研究,管理學報,18(1),1-20。 張齡文,2015,企業合併綜效與影響因素之研究-以每股自由現金流量為衡量指標,私立文化大學會計學系碩士論文。 陳聖謙,2009,併購宣告及支付工具對主併公司股東財富之影響,國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。 黃開元,2014,併購認列商譽與併購公司長期績效關聯性之研究,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。 黃馨瑩,2014,企業併購之經營績效研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 楊維君,1993,臺灣企業購併支付方式與財務特質關係之實證研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 歐陽豪、許溪南、廖瑞芹、曹惠婷,2004,股權結構、獨立董事與公司價值創造之實証分析-以台灣上市電子業為例,科技整合管理國際研討會,748-762。 潘隆政,1997,企業購併支付方式影響因素之研究-台灣上市主併公司實證,私立淡江大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文。 顏秀玲,1991,企業合併與財務績效關係間之研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 Amihud, Y., Lev, B., and Travlos, N. G. ,1990, “Corporate Control and the Choice of Investment Financing: The Case of Corporate Acquisitions,” The Journal of Finance, 45(2), 603-616. Andrade, Gregor, Mark Mitchell, and Erik Stafford, 2001, 'New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers,' Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2): 103-120. Asquith, Paul, 1948- and Bruner, Robert F., 1949- and Mullins, David W., 1990, 'Merger returns and the form of financing,' Working papers 3203-90., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management. Beatty, Carol A., 1994, “Wanted: the Perfect Tiny Acquisition” , Business Quarterly, 58, 50-59. Chang, S., and Mais, E., 2000, “Managerial Motives and Merger Financing,” Financial Review, 35(4), 139-152. Clifford W. Smith Jr. & Ross L. Watts, 1982. 'Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation Plans,' Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, 7(2), 139-157. Emery, G. W., and Switzer, J. A., 1999, “Expected Market Reaction and the Choice of Method of Payment for Acquistions,” Financial Management, 28(4), 73-86. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. 'Agency Problems and Residual Claims,' Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), 327-349. Ghosh, A., and Ruland, W., 1998, “Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention,” The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 785-798. Ghosh, A., 2001, “Does Operating Performance Really Improve Following Corporate Acquisitions?,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 151-178. Hansen, R. G., 1987, “A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions,” The Journal of Business, 60(1), 75-95. Hasan M M, Ibrahim M, Uddin M M, 2016, ”Institutional Distance Factors Influencing Firm Performance: A Hypothetical Framework from Cross - Border Mergers and Acquisitions,” The Journal of Developing Areas, 50( 6) : 377-386. Healy, Paul M., Palepu, Krishna G. and Ruback, Richard S., 1992. 'Does corporate performance improve after mergers?,' Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, 31(2), pages 135-175. Healy, Paul M., Krishna G. Palepu, and Richard S. Ruback.,1997, 'Which Takeovers are Profitable: Strategic or Financial?' MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 45–57. Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L., 2001, “Integrating Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Actions to Create Firm Wealth,” The Academy of Management Executive, 15, 49-63. Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. Jensen, M., and Ruback, R. S., 1983, “The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50. Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H., 1976, 'Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,' Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, 3(4), 305-360. Lau, B., A. Proimos and S. Wright, 2008, 'Accounting Measures of Operating Performance Outcomes for Australian Mergers', Journal of Applied Accounting 9(3), 168-180. Lewellen, Wilbur G, 1971, 'A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger,' Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 26(2), 521-537. Loughran, T., and A. M. Vijh., 1997, “Do long-term shareholders benefit from coporate acquisitions?,” Journal of Finance 52, 1765-1790. Manson, S., Powell, R., Stark, A.W. and Thomas, H.M., 2000, “Identifying the Sources of Gains from Takeovers,” Accounting Forum, 24, 319-343. Mara Faccio and Ronald W. Masulis, 2005, 'The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions,' Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, 60(3), 1345-1388. Martin, K. J., 1996, “The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership,” The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1227-1246. Mayer, W., and Walker, M., 1996, “An empirical analysis of the choice of payment method in corporate acquisitions during 1980 to 1990,” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35, 48–65. Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N. S., 1984, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221. Myers, S. C., 1984, “The Capital Structure Puzzle,” The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592. Parrino, J. D., Harris, R. S., 1999, “Takeovers, management replacement, and postacquisition operating performance: Some evidence from the 1980s,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 11(4), 88-97. Paul Asquith, Robert F. Bruner and David Mullins, 1986, “The gains to bidding firms from merger,”Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 121-139. Porter, M.E., 1989, “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,” In: Asch, D., Bowman, C. (eds) Readings in Strategic Management. Pound, J., 1988, “Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20(Supplement C), 237-265. Rahman, A.R. and Limmack, R.J., 2004, “Corporate Acquisitions and the Operating Performance of Malaysian Companies,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31, 359-400. Ramaswamy, K.P. and Waegelein, J.F., 2003, “Firm Financial Performance Following Mergers,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20, 115-126. Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin, 1983, “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41-55. Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin, 1985, “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity,” American Statistician, 39, 33-38. Rosett, 1990, “Do Union Wealth Concessions Explain Takeover Premiums?: The Evidence on Contract Wages,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 263-282. S. Linn and J. Switzer, 2001, “Are Cash Acquisitions Associated with Better Post-Combination Operating Performance than Stock Acquisitions,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(6), 1113-1138. Shleifer, Andrei, and Lawrence H Summers., 1988, “Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers.” Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences., edited by Alan J Auerbach, 33-56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Singh, H. and C. Montgomery, 1987, “Corporate Acquisition Strategies and Economic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 8, 377–86. Switzer, J.A., 1996, “Evidence on Real Gains in Corporate Acquisitiions,” Journal of Economics and Business, 48, 443-460. Tehranian, Hassan, Nickolaos Travlos, and James Waegelein, 1987, “The effect of long-term performance plans on corporate sell-off induced abnormal returns,” Journal of Finance, 42, 933-942. Travlos, N. G., 1987, Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns,” The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 943-963. Yook, K. C., Gangopadhyay, P., and McCabe, G. M., 1999, “Information Asymmetry, Management Control, And Method Of Payment In Acquisitions,” Journal of Financial Research, 22(4), 413-427. Zhang, P., 2001, “What Really Determines the Payment Methods in M&A Deals,” Working paper no.0103. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester (UK), 1-25.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84306-
dc.description.abstract併購支付方式的選擇為公司營運之重大決策,而併購後績效是否產生亦為眾所關心的焦點,但國內針對雙方整合性的討論相對較少,因此本研究試圖建立起併購績效與併購支付方式的關係。我們蒐集2001年至2015年間台灣公開發行以上之公司為樣本,計算主併公司與被併公司的產業調整後營運現金流量報酬率,並採用t檢定並以差異中差異法捕捉併購前後績效的變化。研究結果顯示,內部人持股比、市價帳面比對併購支付方式的選擇皆呈顯著,而外部法人的監督效果,則對於該決策不具顯著的影響;而在證實併購活動確實會造成營運績效上之改變後,本研究進一步發現併購支付方式對於併購績效的產生兩者間存有關聯性。本研究的主要實證模型中係採用產業調整後營運現金流量報酬率為指標,我們發現併購績效與併購支付方式呈現正向顯著關聯;在穩健性測試中則採用每股自由現金流量以及資產報酬率為指標,結果則分別呈現負向顯著以及負向不顯著。雖然在併購績效與併購支付方式的關聯性上,原實證模型與穩健性測試有所不同,此情況係因前者在衡量方式上將被併公司與主併公司一同納入考慮,並非如後者純就主併公司觀點進行評估,展現了於一樁併購事件以及一個主併公司不同視角下的結果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractM&A payment methods and synergy creation are both material topics in corporate strategy. However, only a few research have been brought forward to discuss the integration for both issues, and few efforts were made to draw attention to the domestic cases. In the article, we try to establish the empirical study on the association between M&A payment methods and synergy creation. We collect samples from the domestic publicly listed company, dated from 2001 to 2015. We apply t-test and the difference-in-difference approach on these samples with the usage of industry-adjusted operating cash flow return on book value of assets, supplement information from TWSE MOPS to find more about what factor influences the choice of M&A payments and what affects incremental financial performance after M&A. Our study shows that insider’s shareholding percentage and market to book ratio influence payment method selection, while the strength of outside monitor tends to be insignificant. As we conclude that M&A has more negative effects on synergy creation, our findings also reveal the relationship between payment method and financial performance. Results show significant and positive relation between the two while we discovered opposite outcome from the robustness tests, which use free cash flow per share and return on asset as their evaluation metrics. Although, there are conflicts in the robustness tests, it still provides valuable insights from a sole corporate perspective other from our original view of a M&A event, taking the two parties involved in the transaction into consideration.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:08:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0906202201253200.pdf: 2293886 bytes, checksum: 7a074217811810649e89721037bbae6e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝................................................................i 中文摘要...........................................................ii ABSTRACT..........................................................iii 第一章 緒論........................................................ 1 第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 .......................................... 4 第一節 文獻回顧 ................................................... 4 第二節 假說建立 .................................................. 20 第三章 研究設計 ................................................... 23 第一節 樣本資料來源與選取 ........................................ 23 第二節 實證方法與模型 ............................................ 28 第三節 變數衡量 .................................................. 33 第四章 研究結果 ................................................... 41 第一節 敘述統計 .................................................. 41 第二節 實證結果 .................................................. 49 第五章 研究結論、限制與建議 ....................................... 65 第一節 研究結論 .................................................. 65 第二節 研究限制與建議 ............................................ 68 參考文獻 .......................................................... 69
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject併購後績效衡量zh_TW
dc.subject員工zh_TW
dc.subject併購支付方式zh_TW
dc.subject薪酬zh_TW
dc.subject現金流量zh_TW
dc.subject企業併購zh_TW
dc.subjectCompensationen
dc.subjectFinancial Performanceen
dc.subjectM&A Payment Methoden
dc.subjectCorporate Financeen
dc.subjectEmployeeen
dc.subjectCash Flowen
dc.title併購支付方式與併購後績效之整合性研究: 以差異中差異法之觀點zh_TW
dc.titleA Comprehensive Study on the Relationships between M&A Payments and Post M&A Operating Performance: A Difference in Difference Approachen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳坤志(Kun-Chin Chen),顏如君(Ju-Chun Yen)
dc.subject.keyword企業併購,現金流量,薪酬,併購支付方式,併購後績效衡量,員工,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Finance,M&A Payment Method,Financial Performance,Cash Flow,Employee,Compensation,en
dc.relation.page75
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202200894
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-06-10
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-06-30-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0906202201253200.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
2.24 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved